林业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (11): 75-83.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20230483
李建伟,覃万玲,辉朝茂,陈倩,王雨濛,朱书红,赵秀婷*,刘蔚漪
收稿日期:
2023-10-11
出版日期:
2024-11-25
发布日期:
2024-11-30
通讯作者:
赵秀婷
基金资助:
Jianwei Li,Wanling Qin,Chaomao Hui,Qian Chen,Yumeng Wang,Shuhong Zhu,Xiuting Zhao*,Weiyi Liu
Received:
2023-10-11
Online:
2024-11-25
Published:
2024-11-30
Contact:
Xiuting Zhao
摘要:
目的: 研究甜龙竹笋品质的地理变异及其与立地环境的关系,为甜龙竹的经营管理及竹笋品质的提高提供科学依据和理论支持。方法: 以云南省7个不同种植区(芒市、思茅区、石屏县、新平县、昌宁县、临翔区和沧源县)的甜龙竹为研究对象,对其外观形态和营养成分进行测定,采用方差、相关性和冗余等分析方法对竹笋品质指标与土壤化学性质、气候和海拔等环境因子进行分析。结果: 1)不同地区甜龙竹笋外观形态存在显著差异,昌宁县竹笋的基径、笋长指标最高,沧源县竹笋质量指标最高,芒市竹笋可食量指标最高,可食率以石屏县最高。2)在营养成分方面,昌宁县竹笋单宁含量显著高于其他地区;芒市竹笋可溶性糖含量显著高于其他地区;临翔区竹笋粗脂肪含量显著高于其他地区;思茅区竹笋木质素、灰分和蛋白质含量显著高于其他地区;新平县竹笋纤维素含量显著高于其他地区。3)相关性分析表明,竹笋基径与8月低温呈极显著负相关,脯氨酸与8月降水量呈显著正相关,精氨酸与速效钾呈显著正相关,精氨酸与空气相对湿度和8月平均温呈显著正相关。4)冗余分析结果表明,粗脂肪、精氨酸、组氨酸、丝氨酸、苏氨酸、蛋白质等竹笋营养成分对土壤速效磷和全磷含量表现为正响应,笋长、质量和可食量等外观形态表现出负响应;笋长、质量和可食量以及含水率与空气相对湿度和8月平均温呈正相关;脯氨酸、丙氨酸、单宁、谷氨酸和蛋氨酸等营养指标与8月降水量呈正响应,与土壤有机质呈负响应;天冬氨酸、可溶性糖和可食率与土壤有机质呈正响应,与8月降水量呈负相关。结论: 7个地区中昌宁县甜龙竹笋品质最优;8月低温是影响甜龙竹笋外观形态的主要环境因子,空气相对湿度和8月平均温是影响竹笋基本营养成分的主要环境因子,甜龙竹笋氨基酸含量主要受速效钾和8月降水量的影响;竹笋外观形态与土壤有机碳、空气相对湿度和8月平均温呈正响应关系,竹笋营养成分与土壤速效磷、全磷和8月降水量呈正响应关系。
中图分类号:
李建伟,覃万玲,辉朝茂,陈倩,王雨濛,朱书红,赵秀婷,刘蔚漪. 甜龙竹笋品质的地理变异及其与立地环境的关系[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(11): 75-83.
Jianwei Li,Wanling Qin,Chaomao Hui,Qian Chen,Yumeng Wang,Shuhong Zhu,Xiuting Zhao,Weiyi Liu. Geographical Variation in Quality of Dendrocalamus brandisii Bamboo Shoots and Its Relationship with Site Conditions[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2024, 60(11): 75-83.
表1
采样点基本概况"
采样点 Sampling site | 缩写 Abbreviation | 经度 Longitude (E) | 纬度 Latitude (N) | 海拔 Altitude/m | 坡度 Slope(°) | 坡向 Aspet |
芒市Mangshi | MS | 98°23′17″ | 24°26′37″ | 1 022 | 13 | 西坡Western slope |
石屏Shiping | SP | 102°26′49″ | 23°44′22″ | 1 457 | 10 | 西南坡Southwest slope |
新平Xinping | XP | 101°35′21″ | 24°0′28″ | 1 226 | 11 | 南坡South slope |
昌宁Changning | CN | 99°39′48″ | 24°31′32″ | 1 229 | 10 | 西坡Western slope |
临翔Linxiang | LX | 100°16′35″ | 23°45′57″ | 1 051 | 15 | 西南坡Southwest slope |
思茅Simao | SM | 101°8′5″ | 22°44′17″ | 1 236 | 17 | 西坡Western slope |
沧源Cangyuan | CY | 99°14′43″ | 23°11′47″ | 1 425 | 13 | 西南坡Southwest slope |
表2
甜龙竹笋外观形态指标①"
采样点 Sampling site | 质量 Weight/kg | 笋长 Shoot length/cm | 基径 Basal diameter/cm | 可食量 Edible intake/kg | 可食率 Edible rate(%) |
昌宁Changning | 1.960±0.295a | 38.000±1.000a | 13.667±1.155a | 1.080±0.192abc | 54.964±1.576c |
芒市Mangshi | 2.043±0.386a | 35.000±2.000a | 5.067±0.551b | 1.403±0.337a | 68.243±4.258ab |
沧源Cangyuan | 2.270±0.598a | 34.633±1.106a | 13.400±5.074a | 1.327±0.497ab | 57.192±10.149c |
临翔Linxiang | 1.133±0.669b | 28.700±3.509b | 10.400±1.082a | 0.717±0.422bc | 63.263±0.182bc |
思茅Simao | 1.047±0.258b | 27.567±2.183b | 10.750±1.048a | 0.583±0.158c | 55.459±1.942c |
石屏Shiping | 1.457±0.437ab | 28.533±1.762b | 12.600±0.854a | 1.063±0.360abc | 72.255±4.046a |
新平Xinping | 1.110±0.125b | 26.667±1.528b | 10.167±1.041a | 0.607±0.064c | 54.823±4.609c |
均值Mean | 1.57 | 31.30 | 10.86 | 0.97 | 60.89 |
CV(%) | 38.36 | 14.57 | 30.38 | 43.28 | 12.94 |
表3
不同地区甜龙竹笋基本营养成分①"
采样点 Sampling site | Tan (%) | SS (%) | Lig/ (mg·100 g?1) | Ash/ (mg·100 g?1) | EE/ (mg·100 g?1) | Cel/ (mg·100 g?1) | Pr/ (mg·100 g?1) | AW (%) |
昌宁Changning | 0.43±0.06a | 3.25±0.77c | 9.87±1.16ab | 9.37±1.17b | 0.93±0.06ab | 18.87±3.79a | 20.63±1.27ab | 92.49±0.30a |
芒市Mangshi | 0.17±0.12bc | 5.95±0.73a | 5.33±2.00c | 6.48±1.64c | 0.93±0.32ab | 12.37±0.38b | 13.37±2.31c | 92.29±0.57a |
沧源Cangyuan | 0.27±0.15abc | 4.07±1.12bc | 8.00±2.21bc | 8.05±1.37bc | 0.87±0.21ab | 16.73±1.61ab | 16.77±2.41bc | 92.50±0.39a |
临翔Linxiang | 0.13±0.06c | 3.57±1.12bc | 7.67±1.82bc | 10.12±0.80b | 1.33±0.42a | 17.77±5.49ab | 22.87±3.55a | 92.63±0.43a |
思茅Simao | 0.20±0.10bc | 1.39±0.55d | 11.80±1.38a | 12.11±0.57a | 0.77±0.21b | 18.73±2.37a | 24.47±4.71a | 92.31±0.33a |
石屏Shiping | 0.17±0.12bc | 4.95±0.54ab | 6.30±2.72c | 9.28±0.55b | 1.13±0.21ab | 16.83±4.01ab | 22.73±3.42a | 89.10±2.73b |
新平Xinping | 0.37±0.15b | 3.67±0.52bc | 7.53±0.74bc | 9.19±0.94b | 0.83±0.12b | 19.07±1.15a | 23.03±3.33a | 86.73±2.36b |
均值 Mean | 0.25 | 3.84 | 8.07 | 9.23 | 0.97 | 17.2 | 20.55 | 91.15 |
CV(%) | 57.60 | 39.32 | 31.76 | 20.33 | 28.66 | 20.07 | 22.65 | 2.73 |
表4
不同地区甜龙竹笋氨基酸含量①"
成分 Content | 昌宁Changning | 芒市Mangshi | 沧源Cangyuan | 临翔Linxiang | 思茅Simao | 石屏Shiping | 新平Xinping | 均值 Mean | CV(%) |
Asp | 272.38±46.84c | 251.08±178.84c | 663.12±239.71bc | 300.85±74.67c | 784.36±112.53b | 690.51 | 72.71 | ||
Glu | 412.01±103.89a | 60.89±54.02d | 375.19±106.85ab | 115.04±54.18cd | 217.23±32.13cd | 227.21±144.98bc | 62.46±28.33d | 210 | 72.70 |
Ser | 331.66±169.22c | 733.49±688.34bc | 62.11 | ||||||
His | 239.98±46.59ab | 32.69±18.92b | 150.99±108.14ab | 395.80±205.78a | 352.99±212.39a | 216.10±124.92ab | 238.09±103.96ab | 232.38 | 69.42 |
Gly | 306.31±43.13a | 54.67±17.34d | 119.39±55.18cd | 186.96±64.10bc | 233.67±96.88ab | 146.24±33.72bcd | 121.63±60.82cd | 166.98 | 55.53 |
Thr | 440.78±83.94a | 129.99±77.01b | 256.70±177.92ab | 539.93±150.08a | 442.91±190.83a | 354.89±146.52ab | 475.59±194.15a | 377.25 | 49.14 |
Arg | 567.16±156.03b | 90.98±41.92b | 370.00±283.73b | 786.27±374.05ab | 834.22±620.21ab | 754.80±229.80ab | 712.61 | 81.51 | |
Ala | 41.78 | ||||||||
Val | 568.64±65.79a | 66.06±44.59c | 146.59±58.99bc | 281.96±72.41b | 303.06±99.10b | 217.24±136.41bc | 248.06±92.13b | 261.66 | 63.61 |
Met | 191.99±98.21ab | 52.94±15.15c | 194.10±36.79ab | 112.05±21.18bc | 280.12±73.29a | 114.50±35.93bc | 89.07±5.09c | 147.82 | 57.81 |
Lys | 557.47±141.06a | 75.74±32.76c | 150.75±93.73c | 288.47±111.91bc | 479.46±268.26ab | 108.71±25.17c | 214.40±149.14c | 267.85 | 79.10 |
Pro | 442.56±227.32a | 127.77±19.40b | 103.21±44.68b | 92.98±34.68b | 174.01±61.21b | 178.83±63.07b | 175.98±42.65b | 185.05 | 74.94 |
图1
环境因子与竹笋品质相关关系分析 *:P≤0.05,**:P≤0.01。pH:土壤酸碱度Soil pH;OM:土壤有机质Soil organic matter;AP:速效磷Available phosphorus;AK:速效钾Available potassium;TN:全氮Total nitrogen;TP:全磷Total phosphorus;TK:全钾Total potassium;Lux:光照强度Illuminance;Alt:海拔Altitude;RH:空气相对湿度Relative humidity;MAT:年均温Mean annual temperature;AAR:年均降水量:Average annual rainfall;AAT:8月均温August average temperature;ATmin:8月低温August minimum temperature;ATmax:8月高温August maximum temperature;APr:8月降水量:August precipitation;Tan:单宁 Tannin;SS:可溶性糖 Soluble sugar;Lig:木质素 Lignin ;Ash:灰分 Ash;EE:粗脂肪;Crude fat;Cel:纤维素 Cellulose;AW:含水率 Moisture content;Pr:蛋白质 Protein;Asp:天冬氨酸 Aspartate; Glu:谷氨酸 Glutamic acid;Ser:丝氨酸 Serine; Histidine;His:组氨酸;Gly:甘氨酸 Glycine;Thr:苏氨酸 Threonine;Arg:精氨酸 Arginine;Ala:丙氨酸 Alanine;Val:缬氨酸 Valine;Met:蛋氨酸 Methionine;Lys:赖氨酸 Lysine;Pro:脯氨酸 Proline;WT:竹笋重量Weight;L:笋长Length;BD:基径Basal diameter;EP:可食量Edible portion;EPR:可食率Edible portion rate."
图2
环境因子与竹笋品质的RDA分析 Tan:单宁 Tannin;SS:可溶性糖 Toluble sugar;Lig:木质素 Lignin;Ash:灰分 Ash;EE:粗脂肪 Crude fat;Cel:纤维素 Cellulose;AW:含水率 Moisture content;Pr:蛋白质 Protein;Asp:天冬氨酸 Aspartate;Glu:谷氨酸 Glutamic acid;Ser:丝氨酸 Serine;His:组氨酸 Histidine;Gly:甘氨酸 Glycine;Thr:苏氨酸 Threonine;Arg:精氨酸 Arginine;Ala:丙氨酸 Alanine;Val:缬氨酸 Valine;Met:蛋氨酸 Methionine;Lys:赖氨酸 Lysine;Pro:脯氨酸 Proline;OM:土壤有机质Soil organic matter;AP:速效磷Available phosphorus;TP:全磷Total phosphorus;RH:空气相对湿度Relative humidity;AAT:8月均温August average temperature;APr:8月降水量:August precipitation;WT:竹笋重量Weight;L:笋长Length;BD:基径Basal diameter;EP:可食量Edible portion;EPR:可食率Edible portion rate."
白瑞华, 丁兴萃, 杜旭华, 等. 套袋栽培对高节竹笋品质的影响. 浙江林业科技, 2011, 31 (1): 64- 67.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2011.01.013 |
|
Bai R H, Ding X C, Du X H, et al. Influence of covering black film-bags on quality of Phyllostachys prominens Shoot. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2011, 31 (1): 64- 67.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2011.01.013 |
|
陈建华, 曹 炜. 稻草覆盖对毛竹笋用林增产效益的影响. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2010, 30 (5): 57- 60.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2010.05.011 |
|
Chen J H, Cao W. Effects of bamboo shoot stand by straw mulching on the yield. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2010, 30 (5): 57- 60.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2010.05.011 |
|
陈中爱, 耿阳阳, 黄 珊, 等. 不同品种竹笋营养品质分析与综合评价. 食品工业科技, 2023, 44 (3): 262- 268. | |
Chen Z A, Geng Y Y, Huang S, et al. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of nutritional quality of bamboo shoots from different cultivars. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44 (3): 262- 268. | |
董春凤, 赵一鹤. 储藏时间和温度对甜龙竹笋采后品质的影响. 竹子学报, 2021, 40 (4): 80- 86.
doi: 10.12390/jbr2022040 |
|
Dong C F, Zhao Y H. Effects of storage time and temperature on postharvest quality of Dendrocalamus brandisii shoots. Journal of Bamboo Research, 2021, 40 (4): 80- 86.
doi: 10.12390/jbr2022040 |
|
高永茜, 蔡婷婷, 杨跃仙, 等. 不同覆盖物对勃氏甜龙竹笋生长与品质的影响. 世界竹藤通讯, 2023, 21 (2): 45- 49. | |
Gao Y Q, Cai T T, Yang Y X, et al. Effects of different types of mulch on growth and quality of Dendrocalamus brandisii shoots. World Bamboo and Rattan, 2023, 21 (2): 45- 49. | |
郭子武, 江志标, 陈双林, 等. 高节竹与毛竹鞭笋品质和适口性比较. 林业科学研究, 2015, 28 (3): 447- 450.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1498.2015.03.024 |
|
Guo Z W, Jiang Z B, Chen S L, et al. Comparative study on quality and palatability of rhizome shoot of Phyllostachys prominens and Phyllostachys edulis. Forest Research, 2015, 28 (3): 447- 450.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1498.2015.03.024 |
|
郭子武, 杨丽婷, 林 华, 等. 沙县苦竹笋外观、营养和食味品质变异的海拔效应. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38 (1): 83- 88. | |
Guo Z W, Yang L T, Lin H, et al. Effects of altitude on the variation of appearance, nutrition, and taste for bamboo shoots of Pleioblastus amarus in Shaxian, Fujian Province. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2019, 38 (1): 83- 88. | |
雷璐嘉. 2023. 土壤通气对雷竹养分吸收和笋产量及品质的影响. 杭州: 浙江农林大学. | |
Lei L J. 2023. Effects of soil aeration on nutrient absorption, shoot yield and quality of Phyllostachys violascens. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A&F University.[in Chinese] | |
李 彬, 曾清苹, 曾小英, 等. 重庆7种笋用竹竹笋的食味品质与营养成分比较. 世界竹藤通讯, 2023, 21 (6): 31- 35. | |
Li B, Zeng QP, Zeng XY, et al. Taste quality and nutrient contents of shoots from seven bamboo speciesin Chongqing: comparative study. World Bamboo and Rattan, 2023, 21 (6): 31- 35. | |
李 荣, 何明霞, 刀定伟, 等. 版纳甜龙竹发笋及幼竹高生长规律. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2010, 29 (4): 735- 739. | |
Li R, He M X, Dao D W, et al. The Bamboo shooting and young bamboo growth rhythm of Dendrocalamus hamiltonii. Genomics and Applied Biology, 2010, 29 (4): 735- 739. | |
李雪蕾, 丁兴萃, 张闪闪, 等. 不同光强下麻竹笋不同部位苦涩味物质含量的变化. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39 (3): 161- 166. | |
Li X L, Ding X C, Zhang S S, et al. The distributions of bitter and astringent taste compounds in the bamboo shoot of Dendrocalamus latiflorus under different light intensities. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2015, 39 (3): 161- 166. | |
李 苑, 张 令, 黎祖尧, 等. 不同产地厚竹笋的营养成分及其对土壤养分的响应特征. 经济林研究, 2017, 35 (4): 147- 154. | |
Li Y, Zhang L, Li Z M, et al. Nutrition components and soil nutrients response characterisitcs of Phyllostachys edulis ‘Pachyloen’ shoots from different habitats. Nonwood Forest Research, 2017, 35 (4): 147- 154. | |
李 苑, 张艳华, 黎祖尧, 等. 厚竹笋营养的地域变异及对生长环境的响应. 安徽农业大学学报, 2018, 45 (1): 64- 69. | |
Li Y, Zhang YH, Li ZR, et al. Regional variations of nutrition in Phyllostachys edulis ‘Pachyloen’ bamboo shoots and its response to environmental factors. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2018, 45 (1): 64- 69. | |
鲁如坤. 2000. 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社. | |
Lu R K. 2000. Analytical methods for soil and agro-chemistry. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press.[in Chinese] | |
裴佳龙, 李鹏程, 王 茜, 等. 云南不同地理种源勃氏甜龙竹笋营养成分比较. 西北林学院学报, 2018, 33 (1): 156- 161.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2018.01.25 |
|
Fei J L, Li P C, Wang Q, et al. Comparison of bamboo shoot nutrients of Dendrolamus brandisii among different provenances. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2018, 33 (1): 156- 161.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2018.01.25 |
|
邱盛媛, 陈 豪, 申 展, 等. 覆盖发热物质对雷竹林土壤化学性质和竹笋营养成分的影响. 经济林研究, 2023, 41 (2): 234- 241. | |
Qiu S Y, Chen H, Shen Z, et al. Effects of mulching heat-generating substances on soil chemical properties and nutrient components of bamboo shoots in Phyllostachys violascens forest. Non-Wood Forest Research, 2023, 41 (2): 234- 241. | |
任青吉, 李宏林, 卜海燕. 玛曲高寒沼泽化草甸51种植物光合生理和叶片形态特征的比较. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39 (06): 593- 603.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0057 |
|
Ren Q J, Li H L, Pu H Y. Comparison of physiological and leaf morphological traits for photosynthesis of the 51 plant species in the Maqu alpine swamp meadow. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 39 (06): 593- 603.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0057 |
|
时俊帅. 2019. 高节竹笋品质形成的环境效应与改良初步研究. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院. | |
Shi J S. 2020. Preliminary study on the environmental effect and improvement of Phyllostachys Prominens bamboo shoot quality formation. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry.[in Chinese] | |
沈学桂. 2022. 雷竹林地覆盖对竹笋萌发和品质及土壤化学性质的影响. 南昌: 江西农业大学. | |
Shen X G. 2022. Effects of bamboo shoot germination, quality and soil chemical properties on covered Phyllostachys violascens forest. Nanchang: Jiangxi Agricultural University.[in Chinese] | |
王春燕, 燕 霞, 顾梦鹤. 黄土高原弃耕地植被演替及其对土壤养分动态的影响. 草业学报, 2018, 27 (11): 26- 35.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2017507 |
|
Wang C Y, Yan X, Gu M H. The interaction effects of vegetation and soil nutrients on vegetation succession in abandoned farmland on the Loess Plateau. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27 (11): 26- 35.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2017507 |
|
王 茜, 王曙光, 邓 琳, 等. 不同种源版纳甜龙竹笋营养成分分析. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2017, 37 (5): 188- 193. | |
Wang Q, Wang S G, Deng L, et al. Nutrient Analysis of Dendrocalamus hamiltonii Shoots from Different Provenances. Journal of Southwest Forestry University (Natural Science), 2017, 37 (5): 188- 193. | |
王曙光, 普晓兰, 丁雨龙, 等. 云南箭竹不同地理种源竹笋营养成分之比较. 竹子研究汇刊, 2009, 28 (1): 35- 38. | |
Wang S G, Pu X L, DingY L, et al. Comparison of bamboo shoot nutrients of Fargesia yunnanensis among different provenances. Journal of Bamboo Research, 2009, 28 (1): 35- 38. | |
吴 鹏, 崔迎春, 赵文君, 等. 茂兰喀斯特区68种典型植物叶片化学计量特征. 生态学报, 2020, 40 (14): 5063- 5080. | |
Wu P, Cui Y C, Zhao W J, et al. Leaf stoichiometric characteristics of 68 typical plant species in Maolan National Nature Reserve, Guizhou, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40 (14): 5063- 5080. | |
徐 森, 董亚文, 陈双林, 等. 6属22竹种箨叶养分与竹笋食味品质的关系. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42 (6): 1373- 1380. | |
Xu S, Dong Y W, Chen S L, et al. Relationship between nutrients of sheath blades and taste quality of bamboo shoots across 22 bamboo species from 6 genera. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2023, 42 (6): 1373- 1380. | |
徐 森, 谷 瑞, 陈双林, 等. 覆盖下雷竹笋箨叶性状和食味品质的变化及其相关性. 林业科学, 2021, 57 (9): 34- 41.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210904 |
|
Xu S, Gu R, Chen S L, et al. Changes and correlation of sheath leaf traits and taste quality of Phyllostachys violascens ‘Prevernalis’ shoots under mulching. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57 (9): 34- 41.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210904 |
|
徐 森, 谷 瑞, 陈双林, 等. 竹子箨叶形态性状的种间差异及其与竹笋食味品质指标的关系. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41 (2): 270- 277. | |
Chen S, Gu R, Chen S L, et al. Interspecific differences in morphological traits of sheath leaves and their relationships with taste quality indices of bamboo shoots. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2022, 41 (2): 270- 277. | |
徐世琴, 吉喜斌, 金博文. 典型固沙植物梭梭生长季蒸腾变化及其对环境因子的响应. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39 (9): 890- 900.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0085 |
|
Xu S Q, Ji X B, Jin B W. Dynamics and responses of sap flow of typical sand binding plants Haloxylon ammodendron to environmental variables. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 39 (9): 890- 900.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0085 |
|
薛纪如, 杨宇明, 辉朝茂, 等. 1995. 云南竹类资源及其开发利用. 昆明: 云南科技出版社. | |
Xun J R, Yang Y M, Hui C M, et al. 1995. Yunnan bamboo resources and their development and utilisation. Kunming: Yunnan Science and Technology Press.[in Chinese] | |
于增金, 殷 彪, 赵 婷, 等. 不同地类对麻竹笋品质的影响. 安徽农业大学学报, 2020, 47 (1): 76- 81. | |
Yu Z J, Yin B, Zhao T, et al. Effect of different land types on the quality of Dendrocalamus latiflorus shoots. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2020, 47 (1): 76- 81. | |
张雄峰, 赵一鹤, 李 沁. 茶多酚处理对采后勃氏甜龙竹笋木质化的影响. 西部林业科学, 2022a, 51 (1): 118- 124. | |
Zhang X F, Zhao Y H, Li Q. Effects of tea polyphenol treatment on lignification process of postharvest Dendrocalamus brandisii bamboo shoot. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2022a, 51 (1): 118- 124. | |
张雄峰, 赵一鹤, 李 沁. 三种生物保鲜剂处理对采后勃氏甜龙竹笋木质化的影响. 西部林业科学, 2022b, 51 (5): 43- 49. | |
Zhang X F, Zhao Y H, Li Q. Effects of Three Biological Preservatives on the Lignification of Postharvest Dendrocalamus brandisii Bamboo Shoots. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2022b, 51 (5): 43- 49. | |
郑 蓉, 郑维鹏, 方 伟, 等. 绿竹笋形态性状与营养成分的产地差异分析. 浙江林学院学报, 2010, 27 (6): 845- 850. | |
Zheng R, Zheng W P, Fang W, et al. Shapes and nutrients of Dendrocalamopsis oldhami bamboo shoots in 12 production areas. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2010, 27 (6): 845- 850. | |
中国科学院昆明植物研究所. 2003. 云南植物志. 第九卷. 北京: 科学出版社, 52-53. | |
Institutum Botanicum Kunmingense Academiae Sinicea. 2003. Flora of Yunnanica. Tomus 9. Beijing: Science Press, 52-53.[in Chinese] | |
朱元洪, 孙 羲, 洪顺山. 施肥和土壤养分对毛竹笋营养成分的影响. 土壤学报, 1991, 28 (1): 40- 49.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.1991.01.010 |
|
Zhu Y H, Sun X, Hong S S. The effect of fertilization and soil fertility on the nutritive composition of bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescence) shoot. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 1991, 28 (1): 40- 49.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.1991.01.010 |
|
朱 勇. 气象因子与绿竹笋产量和质量的相关分析. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 35 (2): 79- 83. | |
Zhu Y. The Effects of Meteorological factor on the Productivity and Quality of Bambusa oldhamii Bamboo Shoot. Journal of Southwest Forestry University(Natural Sciences), 2015, 35 (2): 79- 83. | |
Baraloto C, Paine C E T, Poorter L, et al. Decoupled leaf and stem economics in rain forest trees. Ecology Letters, 2010, 13 (11): 1338- 1347.
doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01517.x |
|
Bhatt B P, Singh K, Singh A. Nutritional values of some commercial edible bamboo species of the North Eastern Himalayan region, India. Journal of Bamboo and Rattan, 2005, 4 (2): 111- 124.
doi: 10.1163/1569159054699317 |
|
Chongtham N, Bisht M S, Premlata T, et al. Quality improvement of bamboo shoots by removal of antinutrients using different processing techniques: A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2022, 59 (1): 1- 11.
doi: 10.1007/s13197-021-04987-9 |
|
Choudhury D, Sahu J K, Sharma G D. Value addition to bamboo shoots: a review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2012, 49 (4): 407- 414.
doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0379-z |
|
Ding Y L, Shi Y T, Yang S H. Molecular regulation of plant responses to environmental temperatures. Molecular Plant, 2020, 13 (4): 544- 564. | |
Dong Y F, Li Q, Guo Y H, et al. Comparison of physicochemical and in vitro hypoglycemic activity of bamboo shoot dietary fibers from different regions of Yunnan. Frontiers in Nutrition, 2023, 9, 1102671.
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1102671 |
|
Fan L, Zhao T, Tarin M W K, et al. Effect of various mulch materials on chemical properties of soil, leaves and shoot characteristics in Dendrocalamus Latiflorus munro forests. Plants, 2021, 10 (11): 2302.
doi: 10.3390/plants10112302 |
|
Feleke S. Site factor on nutritional content of Arundinaria alpina and Oxytenanthera abyssinica bamboo shoots in Ethiopia. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry, 2013, 5 (8): 115- 121. | |
Jiang J T, Zhang Z Y, Bai Y C, et al. Chromosomal-level genome and metabolome analyses of highly heterozygous allohexaploid Dendrocalamus brandisii elucidate shoot quality and developmental characteristics. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2023, 66 (6): 1- 20. | |
Lee X, Wu H J, Sigler J, et al. Rapid and transient response of soil respiration to rain. Global Change Biology, 2004, 10 (6): 1017- 1026.
doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00787.x |
|
Li Y, Li S, Lu X H, et al. Leaf phenotypic variation of endangered plant Tetracentron sinense Oliv. and influence of geographical and climatic factors. Journal of Forestry Research, 2021, 32 (2): 623- 636.
doi: 10.1007/s11676-020-01124-8 |
|
Liu W Y, Wang F, Sun Y M, et al. Influence of dragon bamboo with different planting patterns on microbial community and physicochemical property of soil on sunny and shady slopes. Journal of Microbiology, 2020, 58 (11): 906- 914.
doi: 10.1007/s12275-020-0082-8 |
|
Luo Z, Feng S, Pang J, et al. Effect of heat treatment on lignification of postharvest bamboo shoots (Phyllostachys praecox f. prevernalis. ). Food Chemistry, 2012, 135 (4): 2182- 2187.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.07.087 |
|
Mcallister C H, Beatty P H, Good AG. Engineering nitrogen use efficient crop plants: the current status. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2012, 10 (9): 1011- 1025. | |
Mooney K A, Halitschke R, Kessler A, et al. Evolutionary trade-offs in plants mediate the strength of trophic cascades. Science, 2010, 327 (5973): 1642- 1644.
doi: 10.1126/science.1184814 |
|
Nasholm T, Kielland K, Ganeteg U. Uptake of organic nitrogen by plants. New Phytologist, 2009, 182 (1): 31- 48.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02751.x |
|
Nongdam P, Tikendra L. The nutritional facts of bamboo shoots and their usage as important traditional foods of northeast India. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2014, 2014 (1): 1- 17. | |
Raiesi F. Soil properties and C dynamics in abandoned and cultivated farmlands in a semi-arid ecosystem: Land abandonment and C dynamics. Plant and Soil, 2012, 351 (1): 161- 175.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-0941-5 |
|
Smith E C, Griffiths H, Wood L, et al. Intra-specific variation in the photosynthetic responses of cyanobiont lichens from contrasting habitats. New Phytologist, 1998, 138 (2): 213- 223. | |
Wright I J, Reich P B, Westoby M, et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 2004, 42 (6985): 821- 827. |
[1] | 郑亚雄,范少辉,张璇,周潇,官凤英. 带状采伐毛竹林生产力变化规律[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(2): 22-29. |
[2] | 李庆鹏,李洋,霍若冰,徐曈晖,李馨男. 冰温状态下蓝莓质量损失率与质构参数变化规律及相关分析[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(8): 117-125. |
[3] | 曹德美,张亚红,成星奇,项晓冬,张磊,胡建军. 青杨不同种群叶片表型性状的遗传变异[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(8): 56-67. |
[4] | 陆海飞,刘望舒,徐建民,李光友,范春节,梁国坚,张磊. 广西中南部尾巨桉人工林立地类型划分及立地质量评价[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(5): 13-24. |
[5] | 马凡强,郭泉水,秦爱丽,简尊吉,黄吉勇,王中兵,杨泉,张世强. 濒危植物崖柏回归苗木存活和生长与环境因子的关联性[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(11): 1-12. |
[6] | 任玉连,陆梅,曹乾斌,李聪,冯峻,王志胜. 南滚河自然保护区森林土壤酶活性对海拔升高的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(4): 22-34. |
[7] | 何经纬,张伊莹,田呈明,熊典广,梁英梅. 区域景观格局对杨树锈病为害流行的影响——以北京延庆地区银白杨为例[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(4): 99-108. |
[8] | 王文杰, 杜红居, 肖路, 张建宇, 仲召亮, 周伟, 张波, 王洪元. 凉水自然保护区3种森林类型的植物组成和林分结构特征[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(9): 166-176. |
[9] | 杨玉萍, 潘存德, 余戈壁, 李贵华, 刘景, 崔倩, 刘博. 喀纳斯泰加林群落与环境和火干扰因子的关系[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(5): 114-124. |
[10] | 方加兴, 武承旭, 卢文娟, 刘福, 张苏芳, 张真, 孔祥波. 横坑切梢小蠹林间危害与诱捕量之间的相关性分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(4): 129-135. |
[11] | 梁森苗, 张淑文, 任海英, 郑锡良, 戚行江. 蜡杨梅与杨梅种间嫁接及亲缘关系分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(4): 171-177. |
[12] | 尹赛男, 舒立福, 张大明, 单延龙, 杜帅, 唐抒圆, 张鑫瑶, 张志文. 吉林省森林火灾火源数据特征分析[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(7): 165-172. |
[13] | 龚雪伟, 吕光辉, 马玉, 张雪妮, 何学敏, 郭振洁. 艾比湖流域2种典型荒漠盐生植物冠下土与叶片的生态化学计量特征[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(4): 28-36. |
[14] | 刘宇, 徐焕文, 尚福强, 焦宏, 张利民, 罗建新, 滕文华, 刘桂丰. 16年生白桦种源变异及区划[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(9): 48-56. |
[15] | 陈存, 丁昌俊, 苏晓华, 黄秦军. 欧美杨纤维含量构成因素的相关和通径分析[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(11): 124-133. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||