中亚热带天然林改造成人工林后土壤呼吸的变化特征

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190401

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的]研究中亚热带常绿阔叶林（天然林）改造成人工林后土壤碳排放量的变化及主要影响因子，为评估森林类型转换对土壤碳排放的影响提供科学依据。[方法]在福建农林大学西芹教学林场的常绿阔叶林及由其改造而来的38年生闽楠人工林与35年生杉木人工林中分别设置4块20 m×20 m样地，利用Li-8100土壤碳通量观测系统于2014年9月—2016年9月进行定点观测，并同期观测土壤温度、含水量、有机碳含量（SOC）、微生物生物量碳含量（MBC）、可溶性有机碳含量（DOC）、0~20 cm土层细根生物量和年凋落物量及凋落物碳氮比（C/N）。[结果]常绿阔叶林改造成闽楠（38年后）和杉木人工林（35年后），年均土壤碳排放通量由16.22显著降为12.71和4.83 tC·hm^-2a^-1，分别减少21.60%和70.20%；各林分类型的土壤呼吸温度敏感性Q₁₀值表现为常绿阔叶林（1.97） < 闽楠人工林（2.03） < 杉木人工林（2.91），转换为杉木人工林后，Q₁₀值显著升高（P<0.05）；土壤温度能分别解释常绿阔叶林、闽楠人工林与杉木人工林土壤呼吸速率变化的89.70%、88.50%和87.90%，土壤呼吸速率和土壤含水量相关不显著（P>0.05）；土壤呼吸速率和SOC、MBC、DOC、年凋落物量及0~20 cm土层细根生物量均极显著正相关（P<0.01）；土壤呼吸温度敏感性指数Q₁₀值和凋落物C/N极显著正相关（P<0.01），而与年均土壤呼吸速率及MBC极显著负相关（P<0.01）；进一步分析发现土壤MBC和SOC含量是影响土壤呼吸速率的2个最重要因子，而凋落物C/N在影响土壤呼吸温度敏感性中的贡献最大。[结论]中亚热带地区常绿阔叶林改造成闽楠（38年）或杉木（35年）人工林后，土壤碳排放通量显著降低。林分类型转换后树种组成和林分结构发生改变，凋落物数量、质量及细根生物量显著降低，土壤SOC和MBC含量显著下降可共同导致土壤呼吸通量的下降。土壤温度是3种林分类型土壤呼吸季节变化的主导因素，而土壤总有机碳库和土壤微生物量碳库的差异是不同林分之间土壤呼吸差异的主导因素，凋落物C/N对土壤呼吸的Q₁₀影响最大。为提高模型预测森林类型转换影响土壤碳排放的精度，应综合考虑土壤有机碳库、易变性有机碳库及底物质量的变化。

关键词: 林分类型转换, 常绿阔叶林, 人工林, 土壤呼吸速率, 土壤碳库, 温度敏感性

Abstract: [Objective]The aim of this study was to explore the changes in soil carbon (C) fluxes after conversion from evergreen broad-leaved forest (natural forest) to plantations for 35 and 38 years in central-subtropical areas, the results will provide a theoretical basis for assessing soil C emissions.[Method]An evergreen broad-leaved forest and two plantations converted from the natural forest, i.e., a Phoebe bournei stand and a Cunninghamia lanceolata stand in Xiqin Forest Farm of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University were monitored. Four plots (20 m×20 m) were established in each stand and soil carbon dioxide fluxes were measured using an Automated Soil CO₂ Flux System (Li-8100) over 25 months (from September 2014 to September 2016). Soil temperature, soil water content, organic C content, microbial biomass C content, soluble C content, annual litter biomass, fine root biomass (0-20 cm soil layer) and litter C/N were measured.[Results]Results showed that stand conversion significantly reduced soil C fluxes. The annual soil C fluxes decreased from 16.22 tC·hm^-2a^-1 in natural forest to 12.71 and 4.83 tC·hm^-2a^-1 in a Phoebe bournei stand and a Cunninghamia lanceolata stand, reduced by 21.6% and 70.2% respectively. Stand conversion resulted in increased temperature sensitivity of soil respiration. The Q₁₀ values were ordered as follows:evergreen broad-leaved forest (1.97) < P. bournei stand (2.03) < C. lanceolata stand (2.91). The Q₁₀ value of C.lanceolata stand was significantly higher than that of the evergreen broad-leaved forest(P<0.05). Soil temperature explained 89.70%, 88.50%, and 87.90% of the variation in soil respiration rate in the evergreen broad-leaved forest, P. bournei stand and C. lanceolata stand, respectively. There were no significant relationships between soil water content and soil respiration rate (P>0.05). Correlations showed highly significant positive relationships between soil respiration rate and soil organic C content, dissolved organic C, microbial biomass C, annual litter biomass, fine root biomass (0-20 cm soil layer) (P<0.01). Accordingly, the Q₁₀ values were significantly positively correlated with litter C/N ratios, whereas it significantly negatively correlated with annual C fluxes and microbial biomass C (P<0.01). Further analysis showed that soil organic C and microbial biomass C were two important factors for determining the changes in soil respiration rates. However, litter C/N ratios were the most important regulators of Q₁₀ values.[Conclusion]In central-subtropical area, stands conversion from evergreen broad-leaved forest to plantations for 35 and 38 years resulting in significant decreases in soil C fluxes, which were associated by shifts in tree species composition and structure, decreased quantity and quality of litters, fine root biomass, soil organic C and microbial biomass C. Soil temperature drove the seasonal changes in soil respiration, soil organic C and soil microbial biomass C were the key factors determine soil respiration rates, while litter C/N ratio was the most important factor of Q₁₀ values. Our study highlights that soil organic C, soluble C and substrate quality should be incorporated into future models when predicting stand conversion effect on accuracy of soil C emissions.

Key words: conversion of stand type, evergreen broad-leaved forest, plantation, soil respiration rate, soil carbon stock, temperature sensitivity

中图分类号:

S719

刘宝, 王民煌, 余再鹏, 林思祖, 林开敏. 中亚热带天然林改造成人工林后土壤呼吸的变化特征[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(4): 1-12.

Liu Bao, Wang Minhuang, Yu Zaipeng, Lin Sizu, Lin Kaimin. Characterization of Soil Respiration after Conversion from Natural Forest to Plantations in Central-Subtropical Area[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(4): 1-12.

参考文献

陈广生,田汉勤.2007.土地利用/覆盖变化对陆地生态系统碳循环的影响.植物生态学报,31(2):189-204.
(Chen G S,Tian H Q. 2007. Land use/cover change effects on carbon cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. Journal of Plant Ecology,31(2):189-204.[in Chinese])
陈光水,杨玉盛,吕萍萍,等.2008.中国森林土壤呼吸模式.生态学报,28(4):1748-1761.
(Chen G S, Yang Y S, Lü P P,et al. 2008. Regional patterns of soil respiration in China's forests. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28(4):1748-1761.[in Chinese])
陈光水,杨玉盛,王小国,等.2005.格氏栲天然林与人工林根系呼吸季节动态及影响因素.生态学报,25(8):1941-1947.
(Chen G S, Yang Y S, Wang X G, et al. 2005. Root respiration in a natural forest and two plantations in subtropical China:seasonal dynamics and controlling factors. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 25(8):1941-1947.[in Chinese])
郭培培,江洪,余树全,等.2009.亚热带6种针叶和阔叶树种凋落叶分解比较.应用与环境生物学报,15(5):655-659.
(Guo P P, Jiang H, Yu S Q, et al. 2009. Comparison of litter decomposition of six species of coniferous and broad-leaved trees in subtropical China. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 15(5):655-659.[in Chinese])
李永夫,姜培坤,刘娟,等.2010.施肥对毛竹林土壤水溶性有机碳氮与温室气体排放的影响.林业科学,46(12):165-170.
(Li Y H, Jiang P K, Liu J, et al. 2010. Effect of fertilization on water-soluble organic C, N, and emission of greenhouse gases in the soil of Phyllostachys edulis stands. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 46(12):165-170.[in Chinese])
柳思勉.2016.干扰强度对会同杉木林内环境特征的影响研究.长沙:湖南大学博士学位论文.
(Liu S M. 2016. Study on the effect of disturbance intensity on environmental characteristics of Chinese fir plantation in Huitong. Changsha:PhD thesis of Hunan University.[in Chinese])
罗雷.2012.林分结构对马尾松土壤呼吸的影响.武汉:华中农业大学硕士学位论文.
(Luo L. 2012. Effect of stand structure on soil respiration in Pinus massoniana forest. Wuhan:MS thesis of Huazhong Agriculture University.[in Chinese])
马和平,郭其强,李江荣,等.2016.色季拉山4种林型土壤呼吸及其影响因子.土壤学报,53(1):253-260.
(Ma H P, Guo Q Q, Li J R, et al.2016. Soil respiration and its affecting factors relative to type of forest in the Sygera Mountains of southeast Tibetan plateau.Acta Pedologica Sinica, 53(1):253-260.[in Chinese])
倪进治,徐建民,谢正苗.2003.土壤水溶性有机碳的研究进展.生态环境学报,12(1):71-75.
(Ni J Z, Xu J M, Xie Z M. 2003. Advances in soil water-soluble organic carbon research.Ecology and Environment, 12(1):71-75.[in Chinese])
彭信浩,韩海荣,徐小芳,等.2018.间伐和改变凋落物输入对华北落叶松人工林土壤呼吸的影响.生态学报, 38(15):5351-5361.
(Peng X H, Han H R, Xu X F, et al. 2018. Thinning treatment and litterfall changes influence soil respiration in a Larix principis-rupprechtii plantation. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(15):5351-5361.[in Chinese])
史宝库,金光泽,汪兆洋.2012.小兴安岭5种林型土壤呼吸时空变异.生态学报,32(17):5416-5428.
(Shi B K, Jin G Z, Wang Z Y. 2012. Temporal and spatial variability in soil respiration in five temperate forests in Xiaoxing'an Mountains, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32(17):5416-5428.[in Chinese])
孙红卫,王玖,罗文海.2012.线性回归模型中自变量相对重要性的衡量.中国卫生统计,29(6):900-902.
(Sun H W, Wang J, Luo W H. 2012. The relative importance of independent variables in linear regression model. Chinese Journal of Health Statistics, 29(6):900-902.[in Chinese])
万晓华,黄志群,何宗明,等.2013.阔叶和杉木人工林对土壤碳氮库的影响比较.应用生态学报,24(2):345-350.
(Wan X H, Huang Z Q, He Z M, et al.2013. Effects of broadleaf plantation and Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) plantation on soil carbon and nitrogen pools. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24(2):345-350.[in Chinese])
王超,杨智杰,陈光水,等.2011.万木林保护区毛竹林土壤呼吸特征及影响因素.应用生态学报,22(5):1212-1218.
(Wang C, Yang Z J, Chen G S, et al. 2011. Characteristics of soil respiration in Phyllostachys edulis forest in Wanmulin Natural Reserve and related affecting factors. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 22(5):1212-1218.[in Chinese])
吴君君,杨智杰,翁发进,等.2014.米槠天然林和人工林土壤呼吸的比较研究.环境科学,35(6):2426-2432.
(Wu J J, Yang Z J, Weng F J, et al. 2014. Comparison of soil respiration in natural Castanopsis carlesii forest and plantation forest. Environmental Science, 35(6):2426-2432.[in Chinese])
闫美芳,张新时,江源,等.2010.主要管理措施对人工林土壤碳的影响.生态学杂志,29(11):2265-2271.
(Yan M F, Zhang X S, Jiang Y, et al. 2010. Effects of management practices on forest plantation soil carbon. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 29(11):2265-2271.[in Chinese])
杨庆朋,徐明,刘洪升,等.2011.土壤呼吸温度敏感性的影响因素和不确定性.生态学报, 31(8):2301-2311.
(Yang Q P, Xu M, Liu H S, et al. 2011. Impact factors and uncertainties of the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31(8):2301-2311.[in Chinese])
杨玉盛,董彬,谢锦升,等.2004.森林土壤呼吸及其对全球变化的响应.生态学报,24(3):583-591.
(Yang Y S, Dong B, Xie J S, et al. 2004. Soil respiration of forest ecosystems and its respondence to global change. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 24(3):583-591.[in Chinese])
余再鹏,黄志群,王民煌,等.2014.亚热带米老排和杉木人工林土壤呼吸季节动态及其影响因子.林业科学,50(8):7-14.
(Yu Z P, Huang Z Q, Wang M H, et al. 2014. Seasonal dynamics of soil respiration and its affecting factors in subtropical Mytilaria laosensis and Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 50(8):7-14.[in Chinese])
张睿,白杨,刘娟,等.2015.亚热带天然阔叶林转换为杉木人工林对土壤呼吸的影响.应用生态学报,26(10):2946-2952.
(Zhang R, Bai Y, Liu J, et al. 2015. Effects of conversion of natural broad-leaved forest to Chinese fir plantation on soil respiration in subtropical China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 26(10):2946-2952.[in Chinese])
Bond-Lamberty B, Thomson A. 2010. Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record. Nature, 464(7288):579-582.
Boone R D, Nadelhoffer K J, Canary J D, et al. 1998. Roots exert a strong influence on the temperature sensitivityof soil respiration. Nature, 396(6711):570-572.
Chen C R, Xu Z H. 2008. Analysis and behavior of soluble organic nitrogen in forest soils. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 8(6):363-378.
Conant R T, Steinweg J M, Haddix M L, et al. 2008. Experimental warming shows that decomposition temperature sensitivity increases with soil organic matter recalcitrance. Ecology, 89(9):2384-2391.
Curtin D, Wright C E, Beare M H, et al. 2006. Hot water-extractable nitrogen as an indicator of soil nitrogen availability. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70(5):1512-1521.
Davidson E A, Janssens I A. 2006. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature, 440(7081):165-173.
Fierer N, Craine J M, Mclauchlan K, et al. 2005. Litter quality and the temperature sensitivity of decomposition. Ecology, 86(2):320-326.
Gaumont-Guay D, Black T A, Mccaughey H, et al. 2009. Soil CO₂ efflux in contrasting boreal deciduous and coniferous stands and its contribution to the ecosystem carbon balance. Global Change Biology, 15(5):1302-1319.
Gromping U. 2006. Relative importance for linear regression in R:the package relaimpo. Journal of Statistical Software, 17(1):925-933.
Hanson P J, Edwards N T, Garten C T, et al. 2000. Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration:a review of methods and observations. Biogeochemistry, 48(1):115-146.
IPCC. 2014. Climate change 2014 synthesis report. Environmental Policy Collection, 27(2):408.
Iqbal J, Hu R, Feng M, et al. 2010. Microbial biomass, and dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen strongly affect soil respiration in different land uses:a case study at three gorges reservoir area, South China. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 137(3):294-307.
Laganière J, Paré D, Bergeron Y, et al. 2012. The effect of boreal forest composition on soil respiration is mediated through variations in soil temperature and C quality. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 53(4):18-27.
Laik R, Koushlendra K, Das D K, et al. 2009. Labile soil organic matter pools in a calciorthent after 18 years of afforestation by different plantations. Applied Soil Ecology, 42(2):71-78.
Li J, Pei J, Cui J, et al. 2017. Carbon quality mediates the temperature sensitivity of soil organic carbon decomposition in managed ecosystems. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 250(6):44-50.
Lindeman R H, Merenda P F, Gold R Z, et al. 1980. Introduction to bivariate and multivariate analysis. New York:Scott, Foresman.
Liu J, Jiang P, Wang H, et al. 2011. Seasonal soil CO₂ efflux dynamics after land use change from a natural forest to moso bamboo plantations in subtropical China. Forest Ecology & Management, 262(6):1131-1137.
Luo Y, Zhou X. 2006. Soil respiration and the environment. London, UK:Academic Press.
Peng S S, Shilong P, Tao W, et al. 2009. Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration in different ecosystems in China. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 41(5):1008-1014.
Prather M, Ehhalt D, Dentener F, et al. 2001. Atmospheric chemistry and greenhouse gases//IPCC. In climate change 2001:the scientific basis (IPCC Third Assessment Report). New York, USA:Cambridge University Press.
Raich J W, Schlesinger W H. 1992. The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus, 44(2):81-99.
Richardt C, Rhaea D, Michellel H, et al. 2008. Sensitivity of organic matter decomposition to warming varies with its quality. Global Change Biology, 14(4):868-877.
Sayer E J, Tanner E V J. 2010. Experimental investigation of the importance of litterfall in lowland semi-evergreen tropical forest nutrient cycling. Journal of Ecology, 98(5):1052-1062.
Schlesinger W H, Andrews J A. 2000. Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle. Biogeochemistry, 48(4):7-20.
Sheng H, Yang Y, Yang Z, et al. 2010. The dynamic response of soil respiration to land-use changes in subtropical China. Global Change Biology, 16(3):1107-1121.
Shi B, Gao W, Jin G. 2015. Effects on rhizospheric and heterotrophic respiration of conversion from primary forest to secondary forest and plantations in northeast China. European Journal of Soil Biology, 66(1):11-18.
Shi W Y, Tateno R, Zhang J G, et al. 2011. Response of soil respiration to precipitation during the dry season in two typical forest stands in the forest-grassland transition zone of the loess plateau. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, 151(7):854-863.
Shi W Y, Zhang J G, Yan M J, et al. 2012. Seasonal and diurnal dynamics of soil respiration fluxes in two typical forests on the semiarid loess plateau of China:temperature sensitivities of autotrophs and heterotrophs and analyses of integrated driving factors. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 52(3):99-107.
Song X, Kimberley M O, Zhou G, et al. 2016.Soil carbon dynamics in successional and plantation forests in subtropical China. Journal of Soils & Sediments, 17(9):2250-2256.
Subke J A, Inglima I, Francesca Cotrufo M. 2006. Trends and methodological impacts in soil CO₂ efflux partitioning:a meta-analytical review. Global Change Biology, 12(6):921-943.
Tobón C, Sevink J, Verstraten J M. 2004. Litterflow chemistry and nutrient uptake from the forest floor in northwest Amazonian forest ecosystems. Biogeochemistry, 69(3):315-339.
Vance E D, Brooks P C, Jenkinson D S. 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 19(6):703-707.
Wang Q, Liu S, Tian P. 2018. Carbon quality and soil microbial property control the latitudinal pattern in temperature sensitivity of soil microbial respiration across Chinese forest ecosystems. Global Change Biology, 15(7):948-969.
Wetterstedt J Å M, Persson T, Ågren G I, et al. 2010. Temperature sensitivity and substrate quality in soil organic matter decomposition:results of an incubation study with three substrates. Global Change Biology, 16(6):1806-1819.
Wunderlich S, Schulz C, Grimmeisen W, et al. 2012. Carbon fluxes in coniferous and deciduous forest soils. Plant and Soil, 357(1):355-368.
Zeng X H, Song Y G, Zhang W J, et al. 2018. Spatio-temporal variation of soil respiration and its driving factors in semi-arid regions of north China. Chinese Geographical Science, 28(1):12-24.
Zheng Z M, Yu G R, Fu Y L, et al. 2009. Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration is affected by prevailing climatic conditions and soil organic carbon content:a trans-China based case study. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 41(7):1531-1540.

[1]	韩新生, 王彦辉, 李振华, 王艳兵, 于澎涛, 熊伟. 六盘山半干旱区华北落叶松人工林林下日蒸散特征及其影响因子[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(9): 11-21.
[2]	陈东升, 李凤日, 孙晓梅, 张守攻. 基于节子分析技术构建落叶松人工林树冠基部高动态模型[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(9): 103-110.
[3]	叶钰倩, 赵家豪, 刘畅, 关庆伟. 间伐强度对马尾松人工林根际与非根际土壤中性糖特征的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(8): 28-35.
[4]	陈秀波, 朱德全, 赵晨晨, 张路路, 陈立新, 段文标. 凉水国家自然保护区不同林型红松林土壤nosZ型反硝化微生物群落组成和多样性分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(8): 106-117.
[5]	胡华英, 张虹, 曹升, 殷丹阳, 周垂帆, 何宗明. 杉木人工林土壤施用生物炭对细菌群落结构及多样性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(8): 184-193.
[6]	肖静, 黄力, 杨超, 李笑寒, 吴小琪, 周礼华, 钱深华, 杨永川. 缙云山常绿阔叶林种子雨组成及其时空动态[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(7): 163-169.
[7]	李一凡, 王玉杰, 王彬, 李通. 西南酸雨区重庆缙云山常绿阔叶林土壤氮矿化特征[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(6): 1-12.
[8]	巫志龙, 周成军, 周新年, 刘富万, 朱奇雄, 黄金湧, 陈文. 不同强度采伐5年后杉阔混交人工林土壤呼吸速率差异[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(6): 142-149.
[9]	张茜茜, 杨庆朋, 刘亮, 王清涛, 李菲, 郭丽丽, 郝立华, 曹旭, 范晓懂, 梁伟佳, 郑云普. 环剥对毛白杨树干表面CO₂通量及其温度敏感性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(5): 1-10.
[10]	王超群, 焦如珍, 董玉红, 厚凌宇, 赵京京, 赵世荣. 不同林龄杉木人工林土壤微生物群落代谢功能差异[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(5): 36-45.
[11]	陈金磊, 方晰, 辜翔, 李雷达, 刘兆丹, 王留芳, 张仕吉. 中亚热带2种森林群落组成、结构及区系特征[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(2): 159-172.
[12]	黄力, 高祥阳, 齐猛, 周侠, 杨超, 李笑寒, 杨圣贺, 钱深华, 杨永川. 缙云山常绿阔叶林粗木质残体储量及特征[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(1): 103-109.
[13]	杨安娜, 陆云峰, 张俊红, 吴家森, 徐金良, 童再康. 杉木人工林土壤养分及酸杆菌群落结构变化[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(1): 119-127.
[14]	周贤武, 高玉磊, 苏明垒, 赵荣军, 吕建雄. 基因工程改良木材性质研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(3): 152-160.
[15]	高尚坤, 肖文发, 曾立雄, 雷蕾, 黄志霖, 王松. 马尾松人工林干扰对土壤微生物群落结构的短期影响[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(12): 92-101.