林业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (2): 101-112.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20240064
收稿日期:
2024-01-31
出版日期:
2025-02-25
发布日期:
2025-03-03
通讯作者:
陈艳梅
E-mail:heshulei1@163.com;chenyanmei@hebtu.edu.cn
基金资助:
Shulei He(),Yanmei Chen*(
),Qianyuan Liu,Wenfang Guo
Received:
2024-01-31
Online:
2025-02-25
Published:
2025-03-03
Contact:
Yanmei Chen
E-mail:heshulei1@163.com;chenyanmei@hebtu.edu.cn
摘要:
目的: 研究酸枣果实表型性状特征其环境驱动因子,筛选优良酸枣产地,为太行山东麓酸枣资源的开发利用提供参考。方法: 在太行山东麓设38个采样点共152个样方,调查各样点的海拔、土壤pH等立地条件,采集各样方内酸枣果实,测定其表型性状(果实、果核、果仁的纵径、横径、质量等)。结果: 1) 酸枣果实表型特征不同地区间存在极显著差异(P < 0.01),其中果仁质量(20.86%)、出仁率(19.63%)、果实质量(13.72%)、鲜果可食率(13.35%)地区间变异性显著。酸枣果实表型特征间存在相关性关系,其中出仁率主要与果实纵径、果实横径、果实质量呈极显著负相关关系(P < 0.01)。2) 环境因子对酸枣表型形状的总解释率为56.7%,海拔(14.2%)、纬度(11.8%)、土壤pH(4.2%)、土壤含水率(3.9%)、土壤密度(3.2%)等是影响酸枣果实表型性状的主要环境因子,其中出仁率与海拔呈极显著正相关(P < 0.01),与纬度、经度、土壤含水率呈极显著负相关(P < 0.01);鲜果可食率与纬度、海拔、经度、土壤砂粒含量呈极显著负相关(P < 0.01),与年均温、有效积温呈极显著正相关(P < 0.01)。3) 根据酸枣果实表型分布特征,筛选出博爱县、赞皇县等“果用型”酸枣产地,涉县、林州市等“仁用型”酸枣产地,邢台市信都区2、赞皇县等“果仁双用型”酸枣产地。结论: 酸枣果实性状间存在较强相关性,出仁率、鲜果可食率在品种选育、改良时可作为重要参考指标。酸枣出仁率、鲜果可食率等表型性状受环境因素影响较大,可将调控温度、土壤pH、含水率等环境因素作为提高酸枣果仁、果肉产量的方法之一。
中图分类号:
贺舒蕾,陈艳梅,刘倩愿,郭文芳. 太行山东麓酸枣果实表型性状特征及主要驱动因子[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(2): 101-112.
Shulei He,Yanmei Chen,Qianyuan Liu,Wenfang Guo. Phenotypic Characterizatics of Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa Fruit in the Eastern Taihang Mountains and the Main Driving Factors[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(2): 101-112.
表1
采样点地理环境"
代码 Code | 省 Province | 市 City | 县/区 County/District | 经度 Longitude (E) | 纬度 Latitude (N) | 代码 Code | 省 Province | 市 City | 县/区 County/District | 经度 Longitude (E) | 纬度 Latitude (N) | |
1 | 河南 Henan | 济源 Jiyuan | 112°33′2.44″ | 35°0′15.39″ | 20 | 河北 Hebei | 石家庄 Shijiazhuang | 赞皇1 Zanhuang | 114°27′36.87″ | 37°35′20.8″ | ||
2 | 焦作 Jiaozuo | 博爱 Boai | 113°4′29.4″ | 35°13′9.9″ | 21 | 赞皇2 Zanhuang | 114°15′43.97″ | 37°40′46.43″ | ||||
3 | 新乡 Xinxiang | 辉县 Huixian | 113°32′15.09″ | 35°30′15.09″ | 22 | 元氏 Yuanshi | 114°21′41.71″ | 37°49′6.47″ | ||||
4 | 鹤壁 Hebi | 淇县 Qixian | 114°08′53.42″ | 35°43′09.30″ | 23 | 井陉 Jingxing | 114°17′31.79″ | 37°56′45.02″ | ||||
5 | 安阳 Anyang | 林州1 Linzhou | 113°48′10.40″ | 35°45′29.97″ | 24 | 鹿泉 Luquan | 114°15′47.47″ | 38°8′38.78″ | ||||
6 | 安阳 Anyang | 114°03′23.05″ | 36°07′21.00″ | 25 | 平山 Pingshan | 114°10′59.48″ | 38°20′37.89″ | |||||
7 | 林州2 Linzhou | 113°52′51.55″ | 36°13′32.24″ | 26 | 灵寿 Lingshou | 114°11′54.71″ | 38°29′55.82″ | |||||
8 | 河北 Hebei | 邯郸 Handan | 磁县 Cixian | 114°05′07.84″ | 36°20′57.62″ | 27 | 行唐 Xingtang | 114°18′49.38″ | 38°34′56.36″ | |||
9 | 涉县 Shexian | 113°45′54.45″ | 36°41′54.45″ | 28 | 保定 Baoding | 曲阳 Quyang | 114°33′35.76″ | 38°41′37.46″ | ||||
10 | 武安1 Wu’an | 113°57′4.94″ | 36°43′28.89″ | 29 | 唐县 Tangxian | 114°41′47.86″ | 38°55′31.21″ | |||||
11 | 武安2 Wu’an | 113°58′23″ | 36°48′21.39″ | 30 | 顺平 Shunping | 114°53′38.15″ | 39°0′32.64″ | |||||
12 | 邢台 Xingtai | 沙河1 Shahe | 114°12′24.73″ | 36°52′28″ | 31 | 阜平 Fuping | 114°20′51.57″ | 39°1′55.51″ | ||||
13 | 沙河2 Shahe | 114°7′45.22″ | 36°57′42.64″ | 32 | 易县 Yixian | 115°7′12.96″ | 39°3′20.80″ | |||||
14 | 信都1 Xindu | 114°10′2.61″ | 37°4′41.49″ | 33 | 涞源 Laiyuan | 114°51′21.69″ | 39°11′33.69″ | |||||
15 | 信都2 Xindu | 114°19′51.94″ | 37°10′52.81″ | 34 | 涞水 Laishui | 115°38′7.59″ | 39°28′38″ | |||||
16 | 内丘1 Neiqiu | 114°03′23.05″ | 37°16′39.93″ | 35 | 北京 Beijing | 房山 Fangshan | 115°59′27.47″ | 39°46′38.74″ | ||||
17 | 内丘2 Neiqiu | 114°17′59.77″ | 37°19′36.11″ | 36 | 门头沟 Mentougou | 116°1′17.26″ | 39°52′41.4″ | |||||
18 | 临城1 Lincheng | 114°27′37.6″ | 37°27′24.02″ | 37 | 昌平 Changping | 115°58′15.84″ | 40°6′4.69″ | |||||
19 | 临城2 Lincheng | 114°25′31.05″ | 37°31′30.92″ | 38 | 延庆 Yanqing | 114°25′31.05″ | 37°31′30.92″ |
表2
38个产地酸枣性状变异特征"
性状 Traits | 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 平均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异系数 Coefficient of variation |
果实纵径Fruit vertical diameter/mm | 18.52 | 9.93 | 13.26 | 1.69 | 7.94 |
果实横径Fruit horizontal diameter/mm | 16.13 | 9.78 | 12.73 | 1.26 | 6.01 |
果核纵径Nutlet vertical diameter /mm | 13.62 | 7.48 | 10.07 | 1.26 | 8.11 |
果核横径Nutlet horizontal diameter/mm | 8.24 | 5.89 | 7.06 | 0.47 | 4.57 |
果仁纵径Kernel vertical diameter/mm | 8.30 | 4.55 | 6.30 | 0.62 | 6.10 |
果仁横径Kernel horizontal diameter/mm | 6.11 | 4.01 | 4.99 | 0.44 | 6.08 |
果实质量Fruit mass/g | 8.50 | 2.55 | 4.55 | 1.11 | 13.72 |
果核质量Nutlet mass/g | 4.25 | 1.26 | 2.44 | 0.57 | 12.50 |
果仁质量Kernel mass/g | 0.59 | 0.14 | 0.33 | 0.08 | 20.86 |
果形指数Fruit shape index (%) | 1.44 | 0.85 | 1.04 | 0.10 | 7.40 |
果核指数Nutlet index (%) | 2.13 | 1.17 | 1.43 | 0.17 | 8.50 |
鲜果含水率Fresh fruit moisture content (%) | 0.89 | 0.17 | 0.67 | 0.05 | 3.65 |
鲜果可食率Fresh fruit edible rate (%) | 0.66 | 0.20 | 0.45 | 0.10 | 13.35 |
果核占比Nutlet rate (%) | 0.67 | 0.28 | 0.47 | 0.10 | 11.50 |
出仁率Kernel rate (%) | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 19.63 |
图2
酸枣果实各表型性状间的相关性 FVD:果实纵径Fruit vertical diameter;FHD:果实横径Fruit horizontal diameter;NVD:果核纵径Nutlet vertical diameter;NHD果核横径Nutlet horizontal diameter;KVD:果仁纵径Kernel vertical diameter;KHD:果仁横径Kernel horizontal diameter;FM:干果质量Fruit mass;NM:干核质量Nutlet mass;KM:干仁质量Kernel mass;FFER:鲜果可食率Fresh fruit edible rate;NR:果核占比Kernel rate;KR:出仁率Kernel rate;FSI:果形指数Fruit shape index;NI:果核指数Nutlet index;KI:果仁指数Kernel Index;FFMC:鲜果含水率Fresh fruit moisture content.*在0.05级别(双尾),相关性显著。**在0.01级别(双尾),相关性极显著。* At the 0.05 level (double-tail), the correlation is significant. ** At level 0.01 (double tail), the correlation is very significant."
表3
环境因子分布特征①"
Code | A /m | AP/mm | AAT/ ℃ | EAT 2022/ ℃ | RDLS | EC/ (μs·cm?1) | SMC (%) | pH | SBD /(g·cm?3) | TP/ (g·kg?1) | SN /(g·kg?1) | TOC/ (g·kg?1) | C/N |
1 | 255 | 715.1 | 14.2 | 3 805.55 | 11 | 163.58±6.41ab | 10.55±0.4abcde | 8.48±0.06 | 0.94±0.04abc | 0.50±0.06bc | 0.58±0.11b | 9.30±1.29d | 16.17 |
2 | 207 | 588.7 | 15.2 | 3 909.25 | 11 | 192.75±12.61ab | 6.45±0.48bcdefg | 8.29±0.11 | 0.76±0.12c | 0.87±0.11bc | 1.35±0.32ab | 21.10±3.54d | 15.63 |
3 | 289 | 697.3 | 14.1 | 3 779.23 | 18 | 190.42±66.75ab | 5.76±0.77cdefg | 6.65±0.16 | 0.79±0.22bc | 0.92±0.16bc | 2.93±1.26a | 33.75±15cd | 11.54 |
4 | 189 | 586.7 | 15.3 | 3 934.80 | 12 | 161.42±8.42ab | 6.31±0.35bcdefg | 8.44±0.10 | 1.19±0.15abc | 0.33±0.10c | 0.95±0.16ab | 50.75±13.16bc | 53.42 |
5 | 519 | 728.7 | 13.5 | 3 424.14 | 6 | 184.50±26.67ab | 5.65±0.56cdefg | 8.07±0.15 | 0.88±0.05bc | 0.86±0.15bc | 2.68±0.58ab | 34.33±4.74cd | 12.83 |
6 | 262 | 560.6 | 15.0 | 3 938.13 | 18 | 254.00±20.60ab | 10.9±1.14abcd | 7.93±0.11 | 1.10±0.09abc | 0.53±0.11bc | 1.80±0.37ab | 60.93±7.31ab | 33.85 |
7 | 517 | 728.7 | 13.5 | 3 424.14 | 21 | 207.17±39.79ab | 8.53±0.45abcde | 8.01±0.06 | 0.92±0.09abc | 0.59±0.06bc | 1.23±0.39ab | 22.85±10.02cd | 18.65 |
8 | 188 | 577.4 | 14.5 | 3 882.14 | 8 | 225.25±55.73ab | 5.79±1.08cdefg | 8.23±0.02 | 0.98±0.1abc | 0.67±0.02bc | 0.73±0.24b | 14.45±3.95d | 19.93 |
9 | 683 | 685.7 | 12.0 | 3 271.58 | 13 | 141.25±12.93ab | 5.21±0.85cdefg | 8.12±0.28 | 1.24±0.09abc | 1.35±0.28abc | 1.18±0.28ab | 10.55±2.68d | 8.98 |
10 | 456 | 618.9 | 13.3 | 3 410.30 | 6 | 257.58±25.47ab | 7.35±0.79bcdefg | 8.37±0.32 | 0.98±0.13abc | 1.00±0.32bc | 1.53±0.6ab | 36.98±10.76cd | 24.25 |
11 | 507 | 618.9 | 13.3 | 3 410.30 | 27 | 190.83±19.11ab | 11.31±0.80abc | 7.92±0.21 | 0.98±0.1abc | 0.61±0.21bc | 2.00±0.27ab | 22.13±3.7cd | 11.06 |
12 | 282 | 602.1 | 13.8 | 3 526.89 | 7 | 153.08±3.98ab | 6.42±1.00bcdefg | 7.31±0.09 | 1.16±0.15abc | 0.40±0.09bc | 1.88±0.51ab | 27.03±6.29cd | 14.41 |
13 | 379 | 602.1 | 13.8 | 3 526.89 | 71 | 210.83±6.50ab | 10.90±0.90abcd | 7.95±0.25 | 0.99±0.1abc | 0.46±0.25bc | 0.93±0.06ab | 9.73±0.66d | 10.51 |
14 | 287 | 670.5 | 13.0 | 3 427.40 | 2 | 79.50±18.54b | 2.39±0.14g | 7.49±0.15 | 1.41±0.03a | 1.57±0.15abc | 0.63±0.06b | 5.78±0.36d | 9.24 |
15 | 165 | 670.5 | 13.0 | 3 427.40 | 7 | 270.50±17.16ab | 8.53±0.83abcdef | 8.03±0.13 | 1.00±0.10abc | 0.65±0.13bc | 0.95±0.1ab | 11.70±1.27d | 12.32 |
16 | 160 | 592.3 | 13.7 | 3 466.88 | 14 | 148.58±12.82ab | 4.55±1.27defg | 8.50±0.18 | 1.26±0.04abc | 0.66±0.18bc | 0.78±0.09b | 8.55±0.92d | 11.03 |
17 | 268 | 592.3 | 13.7 | 3 466.88 | 16 | 145.67±47.70ab | 4.93±1.64cdefg | 6.62±0.13 | 1.29±0.14ab | 0.55±0.13bc | 0.95±0.32ab | 10.53±3.76d | 11.08 |
18 | 97 | 611.8 | 13.5 | 3 526.47 | 5 | 192.33±10.13ab | 9.43±0.75abcdef | 8.09±0.42 | 1.31±0.04ab | 1.06±0.42bc | 0.88±0.09ab | 7.48±1.15d | 8.54 |
19 | 206 | 611.8 | 13.5 | 3 526.47 | 17 | 209.67±10.33ab | 10.38±0.45abcde | 8.33±0.12 | 1.19±0.03abc | 0.43±0.12bc | 0.65±0.09b | 3.55±0.48d | 5.46 |
20 | 155 | 669.4 | 13.2 | 3 451.27 | 3 | 227.08±18.58ab | 9.71±0.71abcdef | 8.23±0.03 | 1.11±0.07abc | 0.33±0.03c | 0.88±0.05ab | 17.75±6.12d | 20.29 |
21 | 202 | 628.5 | 13.9 | 3 451.27 | 11 | 233.33±43.85ab | 9.16±2.85abcdef | 7.74±0.09 | 1.41±0.07a | 0.45±0.09bc | 1.20±0.17ab | 10.25±1.92d | 8.54 |
22 | 145 | 703.7 | 12.6 | 3 560.03 | 3 | 200.58±9.64ab | 9.25±1.36abcdef | 8.01±0.07 | 1.02±0.08ab | 0.55±0.07bc | 1.03±0.13ab | 12.73±2.75d | 12.41 |
23 | 346 | 694.5 | 11.4 | 3 350.11 | 28 | 212.67±19.14ab | 9.38±2.12abcdef | 8.29±0.08 | 1.31±0.04abc | 0.66±0.08bc | 0.88±0.05ab | 15.43±2.07d | 17.63 |
24 | 273 | 610.6 | 13.8 | 3 555.35 | 9 | 211.00±12.27ab | 10.26±0.46abcdef | 7.74±0.03 | 1.20±0.10abc | 0.53±0.03bc | 0.98±0.14ab | 10.18±1.60d | 10.44 |
25 | 154 | 683.0 | 11.9 | 3 222.76 | 13 | 184.00±15.39ab | 9.35±0.98abcdef | 6.93±0.20 | 1.26±0.05abc | 0.87±0.20bc | 1.00±0.07ab | 11.08±0.91d | 11.08 |
26 | 216 | 575.3 | 13.2 | 3 356.99 | 3 | 158.67±37.65ab | 8.82±1.34abcdef | 8.17±0.03 | 1.25±0.07abc | 0.75±0.03bc | 0.58±0.03b | 6.85±0.55d | 11.91 |
27 | 229 | 578.7 | 12.9 | 3 521.48 | 6 | 176.83±26.12ab | 8.30±1.64abcdef | 8.20±0.28 | 1.25±0.08abc | 1.18±0.28bc | 0.55±0.12b | 8.50±2.13d | 15.45 |
28 | 116 | 611.7 | 12.4 | 3 531.80 | 16 | 207.50±31.30ab | 8.69±1.07abcdef | 8.41±0.55 | 1.17±0.03abc | 1.46±0.55abc | 1.38±0.55ab | 13.33±7.03d | 9.69 |
29 | 246 | 602.9 | 12.8 | 3 398.67 | 5 | 217.08±18.27ab | 10.22±0.38abcdef | 8.17±0.10 | 1.21±0.03abc | 0.69±0.10bc | 0.90±0.34ab | 18.33±8.75d | 20.36 |
30 | 242 | 740.6 | 10.4 | 3 481.77 | 38 | 232.83±25.33ab | 14.12±0.68a | 8.13±0.25 | 1.19±0.06abc | 1.28±0.25abc | 1.20±0.23ab | 11.30±1.07d | 9.42 |
31 | 684 | 637.2 | 11.5 | 3 113.26 | 11 | 215.08±31.85ab | 5.94±0.34cdefg | 7.37±0.33 | 1.20±0.07abc | 2.23±0.33a | 1.83±0.23ab | 23.58±3.54cd | 12.92 |
32 | 271 | 637.2 | 11.5 | 3 313.72 | 24 | 179.33±43.42ab | 11.05±1.63abcd | 6.84±0.19 | 0.99±0.07abc | 0.74±0.19bc | 1.58±0.31ab | 15.30±3.12d | 9.71 |
33 | 582 | 695.9 | 8.3 | 2 844.67 | 28 | 115.67±28.31ab | 4.24±2.25efg | 6.26±0.41 | 1.31±0.06ab | 2.25±0.41a | 1.20±0.23ab | 12.35±2.71d | 10.29 |
34 | 88 | 625.8 | 10.4 | 3 167.87 | 3 | 201.92±20.30ab | 9.75±0.17abcde | 7.96±0.09 | 1.12±0.07abc | 0.68±0.09bc | 0.90±0.13ab | 10.75±1.27d | 11.94 |
35 | 146 | 601.0 | 11.5 | 3 271.27 | 16 | 268.50±26.44ab | 9.88±0.94abcde | 8.17±0.02 | 0.97±0.07abc | 0.44±0.02bc | 1.90±0.18ab | 73.15±12.27a | 38.50 |
36 | 224 | 687.1 | 9.7 | 3 003.28 | 3 | 282.67±15.80a | 12.56±0.51ab | 7.95±0.03 | 0.97±0.10abc | 0.62±0.03bc | 1.50±0.23ab | 16.00±2.68d | 10.67 |
37 | 349 | 619.7 | 11.5 | 3 304.51 | 21 | 222.83±82.75ab | 3.70±2.35fg | 8.20±0.10 | 1.13±0.17abc | 1.28±0.1abc | 1.25±0.58ab | 22.43±10.78cd | 17.94 |
38 | 493 | 665.1 | 8.9 | 2 940.79 | 29 | 222.42±115.65ab | 7.06±1.63bcdefg | 7.74±0.70 | 1.10±0.12abc | 0.95±0.70ab | 2.00±1.02ab | 30.48±15.95cd | 15.24 |
表4
38个产地环境特征"
环境因素 Environmental factors | 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 平均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异系数 Coefficient of variation(%) |
经度 Longitude (E) | 116.04 | 112.55 | 114.40 | 0.75 | 0.66 |
纬度 Latitude (N) | 40.33 | 35.00 | 37.68 | 1.42 | 3.77 |
海拔 Altitude (m) | 684.00 | 88.00 | 291.03 | 157.06 | 53.96 |
年平均降水量Average annual precipitation /mm | 740.59 | 560.62 | 641.07 | 50.43 | 7.87 |
年平均温度Annual average temperature /℃ | 15.29 | 8.28 | 12.73 | 1.64 | 12.86 |
有效积温Effective accumulative temperature/℃ | 3 938.13 | 2 844.67 | 3 445.41 | 252.84 | 7.34 |
地形起伏度 Relief degree land surface | 71.00 | 2.00 | 14.74 | 12.89 | 87.45 |
土壤密度 Soil bulk density /(g·cm?3) | 1.41 | 0.76 | 1.12 | 0.16 | 14.47 |
土壤含水率 Soil moisture content (%) | 14.12 | 2.39 | 8.23 | 2.64 | 32.05 |
土壤电导率 Electrical conductivity/ (μs·cm?1) | 282.67 | 79.50 | 198.66 | 42.72 | 21.50 |
土壤pH Soil pH | 8.50 | 6.26 | 7.88 | 0.56 | 7.11 |
土壤总磷含量 Soil total phosphorus/ (g·kg?1) | 2.25 | 0.33 | 0.84 | 0.46 | 54.88 |
土壤氮含量 Soil nitrogen/ (g·kg?1) | 2.93 | 0.55 | 1.24 | 0.56 | 44.98 |
土壤有机碳含量 Soil organic carbon /(g·kg?1) | 73.15 | 3.55 | 19.50 | 15.18 | 77.85 |
土壤碳/氮 Soil C/N | 53.42 | 5.46 | 15.35 | 9.16 | 59.68 |
图4
酸枣果实表型性状与环境因子的冗余分析 E:经度Longitude;N:纬度Latitude;A:海拔Altitude;EAT:有效积温Effective accumulated temperature;RDLS:地形起伏度Relief degree of land surface;AP:年平均降水量Annual average precipitation;AAT:年平均气温Annual average temperature;SMC:土壤含水量Soil moisture content;EC:土壤电导率Electrical conductivity;pH:土壤pH soil pH;Clay:土壤黏粒含量 Clay content;Sand:土壤砂粒含量 Sand content;Slit:土壤粉粒含量 Slit Content;SBD:土壤密度Soil bulk density;TP:土壤全磷Soil total phosphorus;SN:土壤氮含量Represents soil nitrogen content;TOC:土壤有机碳Soil organic carbon;C/N:土壤C/N soil C/N;FVD:果实纵径Fruit vertical diameter;FHD:果实横径Fruit horizontal diameter;NVD:果核纵径Nutlet vertical diameter;NHD果核横径Nutlet horizontal diameter;KVD:果仁纵径Kernel vertical diameter;KHD:果仁横径Kernel horizontal diameter;FM:干果质量Fruit mass;NM:干核质量Nutlet mass;KM:干仁质量Kernel mass;FFER:鲜果可食率Fresh fruit edible rate;NR:果核占比Kernel rate;KR:出仁率Kernel rate;FSI:果形指数Fruit shape index;NI:果核指数Nutlet index;KI:果仁指数Kernel index;FFMC:鲜果含水率Fresh fruit moisture content."
图5
酸枣果实表型性状与环境因子的相关性分析 E:经度Longitude;N:纬度Latitude;A:海拔Altitude;EAT:有效积温Effective accumulated temperature;RDLS:地形起伏度Relief degree of land surface;AP:年平均降水量Annual average precipitation;AAT:年平均气温Annual average temperature;SMC:土壤含水量Soil moisture content;EC:土壤电导率Electrical conductivity;pH:土壤pH soil pH;Clay:土壤黏粒含量 Clay content;Sand:土壤砂粒含量 Sand content;Slit:土壤粉粒含量 Slit Content;SBD:土壤密度Soil bulk density;TP:土壤全磷Soil total phosphorus;SN:土壤氮含量Represents soil nitrogen content;TOC:土壤有机碳Soil organic carbon;C/N:土壤C/N soil C/N;FVD:果实纵径Fruit vertical diameter;FHD:果实横径Fruit horizontal diameter;NVD:果核纵径Nutlet vertical diameter;NHD果核横径Nutlet horizontal diameter;KVD:果仁纵径Kernel vertical diameter;KHD:果仁横径Kernel horizontal diameter;FM:干果质量Fruit mass;NM:干核质量Nutlet mass;KM:干仁质量Kernel mass;FFER:鲜果可食率Fresh fruit edible rate;NR:果核占比Kernel rate;KR:出仁率Kernel rate;FSI:果形指数Fruit shape index;NI:果核指数Nutlet index;KI:果仁指数Kernel index;FFMC:鲜果含水率Fresh fruit moisture content*在0.05级别(双尾),相关性显著。**在0.01级别(双尾),相关性极显著。* At the 0.05 level (double-tail), the correlation is significant. ** At level 0.01 (double tail), the correlation is very significant."
表6
38个产地5种酸枣表型性状的加权关联度及其排序"
采样地点 Sampling location | 加权关联度 Weighted grey correlation degree | 位次 Ranking | 采样地点 Sampling location | 加权关联度 Weighted grey correlation | 位次 Ranking | |
15 | 0.74 | 1 | 12 | 0.50 | 20 | |
20 | 0.67 | 2 | 11 | 0.50 | 21 | |
18 | 0.66 | 3 | 3 | 0.49 | 22 | |
2 | 0.64 | 4 | 14 | 0.48 | 23 | |
24 | 0.62 | 5 | 36 | 0.48 | 24 | |
9 | 0.60 | 6 | 7 | 0.48 | 25 | |
19 | 0.59 | 7 | 23 | 0.48 | 26 | |
35 | 0.59 | 8 | 5 | 0.47 | 27 | |
25 | 0.57 | 9 | 27 | 0.47 | 28 | |
1 | 0.56 | 10 | 32 | 0.46 | 29 | |
30 | 0.56 | 11 | 26 | 0.46 | 30 | |
22 | 0.54 | 12 | 17 | 0.45 | 31 | |
21 | 0.53 | 13 | 38 | 0.44 | 32 | |
16 | 0.52 | 14 | 28 | 0.44 | 33 | |
6 | 0.52 | 15 | 31 | 0.43 | 34 | |
33 | 0.51 | 16 | 34 | 0.41 | 35 | |
10 | 0.51 | 17 | 37 | 0.41 | 36 | |
8 | 0.50 | 18 | 29 | 0.41 | 37 | |
4 | 0.50 | 19 | 13 | 0.40 | 38 |
曹景权, 许向一. 野生酸枣的类型与利用. 河北果树, 2011, (1): 49- 50. | |
Cao J Q, Xu X Y. Types and utilization of Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa. Hebei Fruits, 2011, (1): 49- 50. | |
常 婧. 2018. 辽西朝阳地区酸枣种质资源遗传多样性研究. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学. | |
Chang J. 2018. Studies on enetic diversity of Ziziphus acidojujuba germplasm resources in Chaoyang Region of Western. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University. [in Chinese] | |
迟韵阳, 付宇新, 曹 冰, 等. 气象因子对油茶果实表型和经济性状及茶油品质的影响. 经济林研究, 2022, 40 (2): 267- 275. | |
Chi Y Y, Fu Y X, Cao B, et al. Influence of meteorological factors on the phenotypic and economic characters of fruit and oil quality of Camellia oleifera. Non-wood Forest Research, 2022, 40 (2): 267- 275. | |
崔向东. 野生酸枣资源选优与快速繁殖技术研究. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39 (8): 4464- 4466.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2011.08.023 |
|
Cui X D. Research on the fine individual selection and fast propagation technology of wild jujube resources. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 39 (8): 4464- 4466.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2011.08.023 |
|
段开行, 王晓玲, 毛永民, 等. 酸枣种质资源果实数量性状遗传多样性分析. 园艺学报, 2023, 50 (12): 2568- 2576. | |
Duan K H, Wang X L, Mao Y M, et al. Analysis of genetic diversity of wild jujube germplasm resources based on quantitative characters. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50 (12): 2568- 2576. | |
冯秋红, 史作民, 徐峥静茹, 等. 岷江柏天然种群种实表型变异特征. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28 (3): 748- 756. | |
Feng Q H, Shi Z M, Xu Z J R, et al. Phenotypic variations in cones and seeds of natural Cupressus chengiana populations in China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28 (3): 748- 756. | |
高林森, 郭 烨, 朱晴晴, 等. 河北省野生酸枣果实主要经济学性状分析评价. 果树资源学报, 2022, 3 (2): 13- 17. | |
Gao L S, Guo Y, Zhu Q Q, et al. Analysis and evaluation of main economic characters of wild jujube fruits in Hebei province. Journal of Fruir Resources, 2022, 3 (2): 13- 17. | |
郭 盛, 段金廒, 赵金龙, 等. 酸枣果肉资源化学成分研究. 中草药, 2012, 43 (10): 1905- 1909. | |
Guo S, Duan J A, Zhao J L, et al. Resource chemical constituents from sarcocarp of Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2012, 43 (10): 1905- 1909. | |
何庆海, 杨少宗, 李因刚, 等. 枫香树种群种子与果实表型性状变异分析. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42 (7): 752- 763.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2017.0229 |
|
He Q H, Yang S Z, Li Y G, et al. Phenotypic variations in seed and fruit traits of Liquidambar formosana populations. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2018, 42 (7): 752- 763.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2017.0229 |
|
贺一新, 赵素霞, 崔 瑛. 酸枣仁抗焦虑活性物质分析. 中药材, 2010, 33 (2): 229- 231. | |
He Y X, Zhao S X, Cui Y. Analysis of anti-anxiety active substances of Semen Ziziphi Spinosae. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials, 2010, 33 (2): 229- 231. | |
黄丽莉, 李万和, 龚 斌, 等. 不同产地南酸枣果实性状分析及评价. 食品研究与开发, 2016, 37 (2): 24- 27.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2016.02.006 |
|
Huang L L, Li W H, Gong B, et al. Analysis and evaluation on fruit traits of Choerospondias axillaries in twenty different habitats. Food Research and Development, 2016, 37 (2): 24- 27.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2016.02.006 |
|
康东东, 韩利慧, 马鹏飞, 等. 不同地理环境下酸枣叶的形态解剖特征. 林业科学, 2008, 44 (12): 135- 139,195. | |
Kang D D, Han L H, Ma P F, et al. Comparison on characters of leaf anatomy of Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa in different geography environments. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2008, 44 (12): 135- 139,195. | |
李洪果, 陈达镇, 许靖诗, 等. 濒危植物格木天然种群的表型多样性及变异. 林业科学, 2019, 55 (4): 69- 83.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190408 |
|
Li H G, Chen D Z, Xu J S, et al. Phenotypic diversity and variation in natural populations of Erythrophleum fordii, an endangered plant species. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55 (4): 69- 83.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190408 |
|
李 虹. 2021. 不同产地及炒制前后酸枣仁内在成分、滋味差异研究. 北京: 北京中医药大学. | |
Li H. 2021. Study on the differences of internal components and taste of Semen Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa before and after stir-frying in different producing areas. Beijing: Beijing University of Chinese Medicine. [in Chinese] | |
李晓兰, 丁 雯, 段慧竹, 等. 基于表型性状的酸枣种质资源表型多样性分析. 分子植物育种, 2023, 21 (2): 666- 672. | |
Li X L, Ding W, Duan H Z, et al. Genetic diversity of Ziziphus jujuba germplasm resources based on morphological traits. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2023, 21 (2): 666- 672. | |
梁 静, 魏学智. 酸枣叶对土壤水分的生理生化响应. 植物研究, 2010, 30 (5): 549- 555.
doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2010.05.006 |
|
Liang J, Wei X Z. Physiological and biochemical responses of leaves of Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa to soil moisture. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2010, 30 (5): 549- 555.
doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2010.05.006 |
|
刘爱朋. 2019. 河北省酸枣仁生态适宜性区划研究. 石家庄: 河北中医学院. | |
Liu A P. 2019. Suitable ecological regionalization of Ziziphi Spinosae Semen in the Hebei province. Shijiazhuang: Hebei University of Chinese Medicine. [in Chinese] | |
刘青柏, 刘明国, 肖德平, 等. 辽西朝阳地区酸枣种质果实主要性状特征. 林业科学, 2016, 52 (4): 38- 47. | |
Liu Q B, Liu M G, Xiao D P, et al. Main fruit characteristics of Ziziphus acidojujuba germplasm resources in Chaoyang, Western Liaoning Province. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52 (4): 38- 47. | |
刘淑怡, 毛永民, 王晓玲, 等. 酸枣种质资源性状调查. 北方园艺, 2023, (16): 34- 42. | |
Liu S Y, Mao Y M, Wang X L, et al. Investigation on germplasm resources of Zizyphus Jujube. Northern Horticulture, 2023, (16): 34- 42. | |
刘素花. 邢台酸枣产业发展现状. 产业创新研究, 2020, (24): 71- 72. | |
Liu S H. Xingtai Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa industry development present situation. Industrial Innovation, 2020, (24): 71- 72. | |
刘亚亚, 张秀丽, 秦一统, 等. 不同酸枣品种在庆阳市的引进表现及主要性状相关性分析. 现代农业科技, 2023, (11): 70- 74.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2023.11.020 |
|
Liu Y Y, Zhang X L, Qin Y T, et al. Introduction performance of different spine date varieties in Qingyang city and Correlation Analysis of main characters. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023, (11): 70- 74.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2023.11.020 |
|
刘新月, 王立平, 刘春和, 等. 2023. 北京百花山华北落叶松群落主要木本植物的叶性状变异及适应策略. 林业科学, 59(7): 12−23. | |
Liu X Y, Wang L P, Liu C H, et al. 2023. Variation and adaptation strategies in leaf traits of main woody plants in the Larix principisrupprechtii community in Baihua Mountain, Beijing, 59(7): 12−23. [in Chinese] | |
米娟娟, 赵娟红, 李治刚, 等. 2024. 宁夏枸杞果皮蜡质积累与气象因子的关系. 林业科学, 60(3): 22−34. | |
Mi J J, Zhao J H, Li Z G, et al. 2024. Relationship between Wax Accumulation in Lycium barbarum Peel and Meteorological Factors, 60(3): 22−34. [in Chinese] | |
欧汉彪, 董利军, 李 娟, 等. 闽楠种实性状表型多样性与环境地理因子的关系. 东北林业大学学报, 2021, 49 (8): 45- 50.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2021.08.009 |
|
Ou H B, Dong L J, Li J, et al. Relationship between phenotypic diversity of phoebe bournei deed traits and environmental geographical factors. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2021, 49 (8): 45- 50.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2021.08.009 |
|
齐国亮, 苏雪玲, 郑国琦, 等. 气象因子对宁夏枸杞果实生长及多糖含量的影响. 植物学报, 2016, 51 (3): 311- 321.
doi: 10.11983/CBB15041 |
|
Qi G L, Su X L, Zheng G Q, et al. Effect of meteorological factors on fruit growth and accumulation of polysaccharides in Lycium barbarum. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2016, 51 (3): 311- 321.
doi: 10.11983/CBB15041 |
|
阮凯华, 唐志书, 刘红波, 等. 不同产地酸枣果肉的品质评价研究. 中南药学, 2021, 19 (5): 896- 901. | |
Ruan K H, Tang Z S, Liu H B, et al. Quality evaluation of sour jujube pulp from different origins. Central South Pharmacy, 2021, 19 (5): 896- 901. | |
宋泽君, 李培培, 袁斓方, 等. 土壤含水率对蓝莓叶片生理及果实品质的影响. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47 (3): 147- 156. | |
Song Z J, Li P P, Yuan L F, et al. Effects of soil water content on leaf physiology and fruit quality of blueberry. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2023, 47 (3): 147- 156. | |
孙亚强. 2016. 酸枣种质资源遗传多样性分析及其核心种质的构建. 新疆: 塔里木大学. | |
Sun Y Q. 2016. Genetic diversity analysis and core collection construction of Ziziphus jujuba var. Spinosa (Bunge) Hu ex H. F. Chow. Xinjiang: Tarim University. [in Chinese] | |
田 野. 2013. 甘肃省沙拐枣天然群体果实表型性状遗传多样性研究. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学. | |
Tian Y. 2013. Study on fruit phenotypic diversity of natural population in Calligonum mongolicum in Gansu Province. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University. [in Chinese] | |
王 瑶, 申连英, 毛永民, 等. 枣自然实生后代酸枣类型主要性状调查. 北方园艺, 2016, (4): 28- 32. | |
Wang Y, Shen L Y, Mao Y M, et al. Investigation of main characters of wild jujube type hybrids from open-pollinated Chinese jujube (Zizyphus Jujuba Mill. ) progenies. Northern Horticulture, 2016, (4): 28- 32. | |
魏丽萍, 韩艳英, 大布穷, 等. 西藏光核桃果实表型性状变异分析与种质资源筛选. 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42 (7): 48- 57.
doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190422 |
|
Wei L P, Han Y Y, Da B Q, et al. Analysis on phenotypic variation and germplasm resource selection of wild Amygdalus mira in Tibet of southwestern China. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42 (7): 48- 57.
doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190422 |
|
吴 萌, 张玉玲, 程喜真, 等. 不同产地酸枣仁中有效成分与生态因子和土壤因子的相关性研究. 时珍国医国药, 2023, 34 (5): 1207- 1210.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0805.2023.05.51 |
|
Wu M, Zhang Y L, Cheng X Z, et al. Study on the correlation between effective components and ecological factors and soil factors in Semen Ziziphi spinosae from different producing areas. Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica Research, 2023, 34 (5): 1207- 1210.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0805.2023.05.51 |
|
武媛林. 2008. 酸枣种质资源的评价及选优. 保定: 河北农业大学. | |
Wu Y L. 2008. Evaluation and selecting of sour jujube (Ziziphus acidojujuba C. Y. Cheng et M. J. Liu) germplasms. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University. [in Chinese] | |
徐 颖, 刘 斌, 王 勇, 等. 野生酸枣的几种开发利用模式. 落叶果树, 2008, 40 (5): 50- 51.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2910.2008.05.019 |
|
Xu Y, Liu B, Wang Y, et al. Several development and utilization modes of Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa. Deciduous Fruits, 2008, 40 (5): 50- 51.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2910.2008.05.019 |
|
闫春梅, 申连英, 王晓玲, 等. 不同野生酸枣类型主要性状调查研究. 中国果树, 2018, (4): 42- 45, 55. | |
Yan C M, Shen L Y, Wang X L, et al. Investigation and study on main characters of different types of Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa. China Fruits, 2018, (4): 42- 45, 55. | |
杨 冲, 李宪松, 刘孟军. 酸枣的营养成分及开发利用研究进展. 北方园艺, 2017, (5): 184- 188. | |
Yang C, Li X S, Liu M J. Research progress on chemical constituents and utilization of Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa. North Horticulture, 2017, (5): 184- 188. | |
杨 雷, 周俊义, 刘 平, 等. 酸枣种质资源果实主要数量性状变异及概率分级. 河北农业大学学报, 2006, 29 (1): 34- 37.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1573.2006.01.010 |
|
Yang L, Zhou J Y, Liu P, et al. Variation and probability grading of main quantitative characters of wild jujube germplasm resource. Journal of Agricultural University of Hebei, 2006, 29 (1): 34- 37.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1573.2006.01.010 |
|
袁杨杨, 孙从永, 徐希明, 等. 酸枣仁活性成分药理作用机制的研究进展. 中国药师, 2017, 20 (9): 1622- 1627. | |
Yuan Y Y, Sun C Y, Xu X M, et al. Research progress in the pharmacological mechanism of active ingredients in Semen Ziziphi Spinosae. China Pharmacist, 2017, 20 (9): 1622- 1627. | |
张 玉, 刘 颖, 王玖瑞. 黄骅古贝壳堤酸枣种质果实性状变异. 北方园艺, 2020, (8): 24- 31. | |
Zang Y, Liu Y, Wang J R. Variation of fruit traits of Ziziphus acidojujuba germplasms at Huanghua ancient chenier. North Horticulture, 2020, (8): 24- 31. | |
张惠娟. 2012. 河南酸枣种质资源调查及其遗传多样性研究. 郑州: 河南农业大学. | |
Zhang H J. 2012. Investigation on germplasm resources and genetic diversity of Ziziphus spinosus Hu in Henan. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University. [in Chinese] | |
张建英, 毛向红, 黄 岩. 酸枣种质资源综合性状评价. 河北林业科技, 2010, (6): 10- 13.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3356.2010.06.003 |
|
Zhang J Y, Mao X H, Huang Y. Evaluation of comprehensive traits of Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa germplasm resources. Journal of Hebei Forestry Science and Technology, 2010, (6): 10- 13.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3356.2010.06.003 |
|
赵桂玲. 2003. 半干旱地区山杏种质资源调查及遗传特性的研究. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学. | |
Zhao G L. 2003. Study on Investigations and heredity characters of germplasm resource of Siberian Apricot in sub-arid area. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University. [in Chinese] | |
周小东, 常顺利, 王冠正, 等. 2024. 天山雪岭云杉径向生长响应气候变化的海拔分异. 林业科学, 60(3): 45−56. | |
Zhou X D, Chang S L, Wang G Z, et al. 2024. Altitude differentiation of radial growth of Picea schrenkiana in response to climate change in Tianshan Mountains, 60(3): 45−56. [in Chinese] | |
朱广龙. 2012. 酸枣生理生化特性及结构特征对梯度干旱的响应. 太原: 山西师范大学. | |
Zhu G L. 2012. The Characteristics of physio-biochemical and features of morphological structure of Zizyphus jujuba Mill. responsed to grads drought stress. Taiyuan: Shanxi Normal University. [in Chinese] | |
邹金拓, 王 鑫, 周 玮, 等. 构树不同种源种子性状地理变异及其趋势分析. 种子, 2020, 39 (3): 62- 67. | |
Zou J T, Wang X, Zhou W, et al. Analysis of geographical variation and variation trend of seed characters of different Broussonetia papyrifera provenance. Seed, 2020, 39 (3): 62- 67. | |
Blackman C J, Aspinwall M J, Tissue D T, et al. Genetic adaptation and phenotypic plasticity contribute to greater leaf hydraulic tolerance in response to drought in warmer climates. Tree Physiology, 2017, 37 (5): 583- 592.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx005 |
|
Costa J C, Fracetto G G M, Fracetto F J C, et al. Genetic diversity of Desmanthus sp accessions using ISSR markers and morphological traits. Genetics And Molecular Research, 2017, 16 (2): 16029667. | |
Najmeh N S, Ali M S, Mohsen B, et al. Quality characteristics, nutraceutical profile, and storage stability of functional beverage prepared from jujube (Ziziphus jujuba var. vulgaris) fruit. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 2021, 45 (4): 15201. | |
Zhang H C, Wang L, Jin X L, et al. High-throughput phenotyping of plant leaf morphological, physiological, and biochemical traits on multiple scales using optical sensing. The Crop Journal, 2023, 11 (5): 1303- 1318.
doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2023.04.014 |
[1] | 王巍樾,万艳芳,王冬梅,于澎涛,王彦辉,白雨诗. 六盘山华北落叶松优势木径向生长及主要环境因子的坡向差异[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(1): 26-36. |
[2] | 杨如梦,汪加魏,付丹,肖艺,吴南生,高岩,朱秋敏,曹嘉晟. 南酸枣花芽形态分化过程及叶片营养生理特性[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(8): 132-142. |
[3] | 葛婉婷,刘莹,赵智佳,张珅,李洁,杨桂娟,曲冠证,王军辉,麻文俊. 不同气候情景下黄心梓木在我国的潜在适生区预测[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(11): 63-74. |
[4] | 张欣, 张秋良, 孙守家, 王冰. 兴安落叶松生态系统CO2浓度及其δ13C动态对环境因子的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(9): 55-65. |
[5] | 张淑宁,陈俊兴,敖敦,红梅,张雅茜,包福海,王淋,乌云塔娜,白玉娥,包文泉. 气候变化背景下我国长柄扁桃潜在适生区预测[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(12): 25-36. |
[6] | 王东升,赵伟,程蓓蓓,张吉军. 基于MaxEnt模型的中国山楂潜在适生区[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(7): 43-50. |
[7] | 王立轩,杨光,高佳琪,郑鑫,李兆国,瓮岳太,邸雪颖,于宏洲. 兴安落叶松林火烧迹地地表枯落物燃烧性变化[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(6): 110-121. |
[8] | 赵鹏宇,白雪,燕平梅,赵晓东,武晓英,柴宝峰. 华北落叶松林土壤细菌群落结构与表型的环境异质性响应[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(7): 101-110. |
[9] | 白蕤,李宁,刘少军,陈小敏,邹海平,吕润. 未来气候变化背景下橡胶树白根病在中国的风险分析[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(6): 37-45. |
[10] | 赵光华,崔馨月,王智,荆红利,樊保国. 气候变化背景下我国酸枣潜在适生区预测[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(6): 158-168. |
[11] | 李文博,吕振刚,黄选瑞,张志东. 河北省北部华北落叶松人工林立地指数空间分布预测[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(3): 79-89. |
[12] | 董雪, 李永华, 辛智鸣, 段瑞兵, 姚斌, 包岩峰, 张正国, 刘源. 河西走廊西段荒漠戈壁灌木群落物种多样性的海拔格局[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(2): 168-178. |
[13] | 马凡强,郭泉水,秦爱丽,简尊吉,黄吉勇,王中兵,杨泉,张世强. 濒危植物崖柏回归苗木存活和生长与环境因子的关联性[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(11): 1-12. |
[14] | 陈模舜,金则新,柯世省,陈子林,潘德月. 极濒危物种天台鹅耳枥群落特征及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(9): 1-11. |
[15] | 任玉连,陆梅,曹乾斌,李聪,冯峻,王志胜. 南滚河自然保护区森林土壤酶活性对海拔升高的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(4): 22-34. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||