林业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (6): 96-108.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20250292
熊世梅1,谭炳香1,*(
),许文强2,李骁尧1,庞丽峰1,胡冰2
收稿日期:2025-05-11
修回日期:2025-07-21
出版日期:2026-06-10
发布日期:2026-06-13
通讯作者:
谭炳香
E-mail:tan@ifrit.ac.cn
基金资助:
Shimei Xiong1,Bingxiang Tan1,*(
),Wenqiang Xu2,Xiaoyao Li1,Lifeng Pang1,Bing Hu2
Received:2025-05-11
Revised:2025-07-21
Online:2026-06-10
Published:2026-06-13
Contact:
Bingxiang Tan
E-mail:tan@ifrit.ac.cn
摘要:
目的: 针对荒漠梭梭稀疏矮小、结构复杂等导致的遥感估算难题,探索干旱区荒漠灌木林地上生物量(AGB)高精度估算方法,为碳储量核算提供技术支撑。方法: 以新疆古尔班通古特沙漠南缘梭梭林为研究对象,基于UAV-LiDAR点云数据进行单木分割,结合异速生长方程估算覆盖区AGB,并扩充样地数量。在此基础上,分别从UAV-MSI和UAV-LiDAR中提取光谱、纹理和结构特征,采用随机森林重要性排序法进行特征筛选。应用随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)和极端梯度提升(XGBoost) 3种机器学习算法构建AGB模型,利用留一交叉验证法(LOOCV)评估模型性能,对仅用UAV-MSI特征、仅用UAV-LiDAR特征以及二者联合特征的建模结果进行比较,选取最优模型绘制梭梭样区的AGB空间分布图。结果: 1) 特征筛选结果显示,归一化植被指数(NDVI)、比值植被指数(RVI)和点云高度最大值(Hmax)等变量在建模中贡献较高,联合MSI与LiDAR数据的特征重要性得分更为均衡,表现出良好的互补性;2) 在各建模方法中,基于UAV-MSI特征构建的AGB模型优于基于UAV-LiDAR特征的模型,其中RF模型R2为0.82、RMSE为0.66 t?hm–2,SVM模型R2为0.79、RMSE为0.75 t?hm–2,XGBoost模型表现更佳,R2为0.84、RMSE为0.63 t?hm–2,表明光谱特征贡献更为显著;3) 联合UAV-MSI与UAV-LiDAR特征后模型精度进一步提升,XGBoost模型精度更高,R2为0.89、RMSE为0.53 t?hm–2,验证了光谱与结构特征的互补优势,确定为本研究的最优模型;4) 样区1的单位面积平均AGB最高,为2.50 t?hm–2,样区2、3和4的单位面积平均AGB逐渐降低(分别为0.90、0.84、0.64 t?hm–2),且70%以上区域AGB低于1 t?hm–2,4个梭梭样区的AGB空间分布差异显著,呈现出随绿洲距离增加而降低的趋势。结论: 本研究建立面向干旱区荒漠灌木林的样区尺度AGB估算流程,验证UAV-MSI与UAV-LiDAR数据在荒漠灌木AGB估算中的协同优势。相较于传统调查方式,该方法具备非破坏、高分辨、低成本等优势,适用于干旱区荒漠灌木林生物量估算。
中图分类号:
熊世梅,谭炳香,许文强,李骁尧,庞丽峰,胡冰. 基于无人机多光谱和激光雷达数据的荒漠梭梭林地上生物量估算[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(6): 96-108.
Shimei Xiong,Bingxiang Tan,Wenqiang Xu,Xiaoyao Li,Lifeng Pang,Bing Hu. Estimation of Aboveground Biomass in Desert Haloxylon ammodendron Shrubland Based on UAV Multispectral and LiDAR Data[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2026, 62(6): 96-108.
表1
样地实测数据汇总"
| 样区 Site | 样地 Plot | 株数 Stem count | 树高Tree height/m | 冠幅面积Crown area/m2 | 单位面积地上生物量 AGB density/ (t?hm–2) | |||||
| 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 平均值 Mean | 最大值 Maximum | 最小值 Minimum | 平均值 Mean | |||||
| 1 | 1 | 54 | 3.78 | 0.51 | 2.34 | 15.37 | 0.11 | 4.22 | 2.46 | |
| 2 | 132 | 6.02 | 0.73 | 1.97 | 41.62 | 0.04 | 3.29 | 5.00 | ||
| 2 | 3 | 27 | 3.57 | 0.48 | 2.07 | 8.39 | 0.08 | 3.23 | 0.79 | |
| 4 | 35 | 3.44 | 0.29 | 1.82 | 18.71 | 0.08 | 2.70 | 0.84 | ||
| 3 | 5 | 121 | 3.77 | 0.44 | 1.53 | 10.31 | 0.03 | 1.13 | 1.11 | |
| 6 | 51 | 3.20 | 0.36 | 1.28 | 3.96 | 0.04 | 1.07 | 0.35 | ||
| 4 | 7 | 53 | 3.35 | 0.37 | 1.46 | 10.22 | 0.08 | 1.22 | 0.45 | |
| 8 | 135 | 3.49 | 0.43 | 1.57 | 7.24 | 0.22 | 1.23 | 1.28 | ||
表2
基于UAV-LiDAR数据提取的点云高度和密度特征"
| 特征类别 Category | 变量 Name | 描述 Description |
| 高度特征 Height metrics | Hmax、Hmin、Hmean、Hmadmedian、 Hstddev、Hvar、Hkurtosis、Hskewness | 最大值Maximum、最小值Minimum、平均值Mean、 中位数Median、标准差Standard deviation、方差Variance、峰度Kurtosis、偏斜度Skewness |
| Hcvz | 变异系数Coefficient of variation | |
| Hsqrt | 二次幂平均Quadratic mean | |
| Hcurt | 三次幂平均Cubic mean | |
| Haadz | 平均绝对偏差Mean absolute deviation | |
| Hmedianz | 中位数绝对偏差中位数 Median absolute deviation from the median | |
| Hcanopy | 冠层起伏率Canopy relief ratio | |
| 高度百分 位特征 Height percentile metrics | H1、H5、H10、H20、H25、H30、H40、H50、 H60、H70、H75、H80、H90、H95、H99 | 高度百分位数Height percentile |
| HIQ | 高度百分位数四分位数间距 Interquartile range of height percentiles | |
| AIH1、AIH5、AIH10、AIH20、AIH25、AIH30、AIH40、 AIH50、AIH60、AIH70、AIH75、AIH80、AIH90、AIH95、AIH99 | 累积高度百分位数 Accumulative height percentiles | |
| AIHIQ | 累积高度百分位数四分位数间距 Interquartile range of accumulative height percentiles | |
| 密度特征 Density metrics | d0、d1、d2、d3、d4、d5、d6、d7、d8、d9 | 密度变量Density variable |
图6
不同数据源和建模方法下AGB估算值与实测值的散点图 MSI表示模型的输入为筛选的无人机多光谱特征,LiDAR为筛选的无人机激光雷达特征,MSI+LiDAR为筛选的二者联合特征;RF表示使用的模型为随机森林,SVM为支持向量机,XGBoost为极端梯度提升。MSI indicates that the model inputs are the selected UAV multispectral features; LiDAR indicates the selected UAV LiDAR features; MSI+LiDAR represents the combined selected features from both sources. RF denotes the random forest model, SVM denotes the support vector machine, and XGBoost denotes the extreme gradient boosting model."
|
鲍莉莉, 李锦荣, 韩兆恩, 等. 基于无人机多源数据的梭梭(Holoxylon ammodendron)地上生物量估算. 中国沙漠, 2024, 44 (5): 50- 59.
doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2024.00032 |
|
|
Bao L L, Li J R, Han Z E, et al. Estimation of aboveground biomass of Haloxylon ammodendron based on UAV multi-source data. Journal of Desert Research, 2024, 44 (5): 50- 59.
doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2024.00032 |
|
| 杜 芳, 荣晓莹, 徐 鹏, 等. 降水对古尔班通古特沙漠细菌群落多样性和构建过程的影响. 生物多样性, 2023, 31 (2): 141- 154. | |
| Du F, Rong X Y, Xu P, et al. Bacterial diversity and community assembly responses to precipitation in the Gurbantunggut Desert. Biodiversity Science, 2023, 31 (2): 141- 154. | |
|
顾亭玉, 张定海, 单立山, 等. 古尔班通古特沙漠南缘半固定沙丘固沙灌木株高-冠幅的空间异质性. 植物科学学报, 2023, 41 (3): 312- 321.
doi: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.22264 |
|
|
Gu T Y, Zhang D H, Shan L S, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of plant height-crown width of sand-binding shrubs in semi-fixed dunes along the southern edge of the Gurbantünggüt Desert. Plant Science Journal, 2023, 41 (3): 312- 321.
doi: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.22264 |
|
|
简尊吉, 朱建华, 王小艺, 等. 我国陆地生态系统碳汇的研究进展和提升挑战与路径. 林业科学, 2023, 59 (3): 12- 20.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20220666 |
|
|
Jian Z J, Zhu J H, Wang X Y, et al. Research progress and the enhancement challenges and pathways of carbon sinks in China’s terrestrial ecosystems. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59 (3): 12- 20.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20220666 |
|
| 金 可, 卢 阳, 周火明, 等. 古尔班通古特沙漠水文研究进展. 水文, 2022, 42 (1): 1- 10. | |
| Jin K, Lu Y, Zhou H M, et al. Research progress on the hydrology in the Gurbantunggut Desert. Journal of China Hydrology, 2022, 42 (1): 1- 10. | |
|
刘清旺, 李世明, 李增元, 等. 无人机激光雷达与摄影测量林业应用研究进展. 林业科学, 2017, 53 (7): 134- 148.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20170714 |
|
|
Liu Q W, Li S M, Li Z Y, et al. Review on the applications of UAV-based LiDAR and photogrammetry in forestry. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53 (7): 134- 148.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20170714 |
|
|
刘世荣, 王 晖, 李海奎, 等. 碳中和目标下中国森林碳储量、碳汇变化预估与潜力提升途径. 林业科学, 2024, 60 (4): 157- 172.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20230206 |
|
|
Liu S R, Wang H, Li H K, et al. Projections of China’s forest carbon storage and sequestration and ways of their potential capacity enhancement. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2024, 60 (4): 157- 172.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20230206 |
|
| 石永磊, 王志慧, 李世明, 等. 基于光学遥感的稀疏乔灌木地上部分生物量反演方法. 林业科学, 2022, 58 (2): 13- 22. | |
| Shi Y L, Wang Z H, Li S M, et al. A method of estimation aboveground biomass of sparse tree-shrub using optical remote sensing. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58 (2): 13- 22. | |
|
陶 冶, 张元明. 荒漠灌木生物量多尺度估测: 以梭梭为例. 草业学报, 2013, 22 (6): 1- 10.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb20130601 |
|
|
Tao Y, Zhang Y M. Multi-scale biomass estimation of desert shrubs: a case study of Haloxylon ammodendron in the Gurbantunggut Desert, China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22 (6): 1- 10.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb20130601 |
|
| 熊晓燕, 李彩霞, 柴国奇, 等. 联合UAV-LiDAR和GEDI数据的区域森林地上生物量估算. 林业科学, 2025, 61 (8): 142- 153. | |
| Xiong X Y, Li C X, Chai G Q, et al. Estimation of aboveground biomass in regional forests by using integrating UAV-LiDAR and GEDI data. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61 (8): 142- 153. | |
| 徐先英, 严 平, 郭树江, 等. 干旱荒漠区绿洲边缘典型固沙灌木的降水截留特征. 中国沙漠, 2013, 33 (1): 141- 145. | |
| Xu X Y, Yan P, Guo S J, et al. The interception loss of rainfall by three sand-fixing shrubs at the fringe of Minqin oasis. Journal of Desert Research, 2013, 33 (1): 141- 145. | |
|
杨军刚, 张玲卫, 郭 星, 等. 古尔班通古特沙漠生物土壤结皮下土壤有机碳垂直分布特征及影响因素. 生态学报, 2024, 44 (7): 2946- 2954.
doi: 10.20103/j.stxb.202308101722 |
|
|
Yang J G, Zhang L W, Guo X, et al. Vertical distribution characteristics and influencing factors of soil organic carbon under biological soil crusts in the Gurbantunggut Desert. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44 (7): 2946- 2954.
doi: 10.20103/j.stxb.202308101722 |
|
| 叶静芸, 吴 波, 刘明虎, 等. 乌兰布和沙漠东北缘荒漠-绿洲过渡带植被地上生物量估算. 生态学报, 2018, 38 (4): 1216- 1225. | |
| Ye J Y, Wu B, Liu M H, et al. Estimation of aboveground biomass of vegetation in the desert-oasis ecotone on the northeastern edge of the Ulan Buh Desert. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38 (4): 1216- 1225. | |
| 邹晓君, 马运强, 李志忠, 等. 古尔班通古特沙漠南缘风沙沉积记录的中晚全新世气候变化. 中国沙漠, 2023, 43 (6): 98- 110. | |
| Zou X J, Ma Y Q, Li Z Z, et al. Mid-Late Holocene climate change recorded by eolian sand deposition in the southern margin of Gurbantunggut Desert. Journal of Desert Research, 2023, 43 (6): 98- 110. | |
|
Ahlström A, Raupach M R, Schurgers G, et al. Carbon cycle. The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO2 sink. Science, 2015, 348 (6237): 895- 899.
doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1668 |
|
|
Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning, 2001, 45 (1): 5- 32.
doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324 |
|
|
Cao L, Coops N C, Innes J L, et al. Estimation of forest biomass dynamics in subtropical forests using multi-temporal airborne LiDAR data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2016, 178, 158- 171.
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.03.012 |
|
|
Ding J, Li Z P, Zhang H Y, et al. Quantifying the aboveground biomass (AGB) of Gobi Desert shrub communities in northwestern China based on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) RGB images. Land, 2022, 11 (4): 543.
doi: 10.3390/land11040543 |
|
|
Forkuor G, Benewinde Zoungrana J B, Dimobe K, et al. Above-ground biomass mapping in west African dryland forest using Sentinel-1 and 2 datasets: a case study. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2020, 236, 111496.
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111496 |
|
|
Hao M Y, Zhao W L, Qin L J, et al. A methodology to determine the optimal quadrat size for desert vegetation surveying based on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) RGB photography. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2021, 42 (1): 84- 105.
doi: 10.1080/01431161.2020.1800123 |
|
| Haralick R M, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. 1973. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-3(6): 610–621. | |
|
John R, Chen J Q, Giannico V, et al. Grassland canopy cover and aboveground biomass in Mongolia and Inner Mongolia: Spatiotemporal estimates and controlling factors. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2018, 213, 34- 48.
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.05.002 |
|
|
Li W K, Guo Q H, Jakubowski M K, et al. A new method for segmenting individual trees from the lidar point cloud. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 2012, 78 (1): 75- 84.
doi: 10.14358/PERS.78.1.75 |
|
|
Li Z Q, Guo X L. Non-photosynthetic vegetation biomass estimation in semiarid Canadian mixed grasslands using ground hyperspectral data, Landsat 8 OLI, and Sentinel-2 images. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2018, 39 (20): 6893- 6913.
doi: 10.1080/01431161.2018.1468105 |
|
|
Lu D S, Chen Q, Wang G X, et al. A survey of remote sensing-based aboveground biomass estimation methods in forest ecosystems. International Journal of Digital Earth, 2016, 9 (1): 63- 105.
doi: 10.1080/17538947.2014.990526 |
|
|
Luo S Z, Wang C, Xi X H, et al. Fusion of airborne LiDAR data and hyperspectral imagery for aboveground and belowground forest biomass estimation. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 73, 378- 387.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.10.001 |
|
|
Lyu X, Li X B, Dang D L, et al. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing in grassland ecosystem monitoring: a systematic review. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14 (5): 1096.
doi: 10.3390/rs14051096 |
|
| Mao P, Ding J J, Jiang B Q, et al. 2022. How can UAV bridge the gap between ground and satellite observations for quantifying the biomass of desert shrub community? ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 192: 361–376. | |
|
Mao P, Qin L J, Hao M Y, et al. An improved approach to estimate above-ground volume and biomass of desert shrub communities based on UAV RGB images. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 125, 107494.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107494 |
|
| Rusu R B, Cousins S. 2011. 3D is here: point cloud library (PCL). 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, China, IEEE, 1–4. | |
| Sun B, Rong R, Cui H W, et al. 2024. How can integrated Space–Air–Ground observation contribute in aboveground biomass of shrub plants estimation in shrub-encroached Grasslands? International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 130: 103856. | |
|
Wang Y X, Peng Y N, Hu X D, et al. Fine-resolution forest height estimation by integrating ICESat-2 and landsat 8 OLI data with a spatial downscaling method for aboveground biomass quantification. Forests, 2023, 14 (7): 1414.
doi: 10.3390/f14071414 |
|
|
Xu J, Gu H B, Meng Q M, et al. Spatial pattern analysis of Haloxylon ammodendron using UAV imagery: a case study in the Gurbantunggut Desert. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2019, 83, 101891.
doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2019.06.001 |
|
|
Yin D M, Wang L. Individual mangrove tree measurement using UAV-based LiDAR data: Possibilities and challenges. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2019, 223, 34- 49.
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.12.034 |
|
|
Zandler H, Brenning A, Samimi C. Quantifying dwarf shrub biomass in an arid environment: comparing empirical methods in a high dimensional setting. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2015, 158, 140- 155.
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.11.007 |
|
|
Zhang W M, Qi J B, Wan P, et al. An easy-to-use airborne LiDAR data filtering method based on cloth simulation. Remote Sensing, 2016, 8 (6): 501.
doi: 10.3390/rs8060501 |
|
|
Zhao X Q, Guo Q H, Su Y J, et al. Improved progressive TIN densification filtering algorithm for airborne LiDAR data in forested areas. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2016, 117, 79- 91.
doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.03.016 |
|
|
Zhao Y J, Liu X L, Wang Y, et al. UAV-based individual shrub aboveground biomass estimation calibrated against terrestrial LiDAR in a shrub-encroached grassland. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2021, 101, 102358.
doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102358 |
|
|
Zhu J, Huang Z H, Sun H, et al. Mapping forest ecosystem biomass density for Xiangjiang River Basin by combining plot and remote sensing data and comparing spatial extrapolation methods. Remote Sensing, 2017, 9 (3): 241.
doi: 10.3390/rs9030241 |
| [1] | 高文强,雷相东,何潇,李玉堂. 东北温带森林类型和发育阶段的树种多样性−地上生物量关系分异性[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(4): 55-67. |
| [2] | 周晟,蒋馥根,陈帅,龙依,王彬彬,宋子戈,孙华. 联合星−空激光雷达和Sentinel-2数据的森林地上生物量估测方法[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(3): 74-87. |
| [3] | 黄柳源,郑炎,程欣杰,曾伟生,徐晴,侯正阳. 面向非全覆盖遥感辅助数据的森林地上生物量估算[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(9): 22-38. |
| [4] | 施正煌,侯方淼,张浩昆,黄国星. 新一轮集体林权制度改革对中国木质林产品出口边际增长的影响分析[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(9): 211-222. |
| [5] | 张宇娇,赵恒谦,付含聪,刘哿,皇甫霞丹,刘轩绮. 基于无人机遥感多特征的单木地上生物量反演模型[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(8): 129-141. |
| [6] | 熊晓燕,李彩霞,柴国奇,陈龙,贾翔,雷令婷,张晓丽. 联合UAV-LiDAR和GEDI数据的区域森林地上生物量估算[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(8): 142-153. |
| [7] | 袁泽雨,许行,任怡,许杨,庞建壮,吴小云,张翰遥,张志强. 2001—2021年“三北”工程区植被韧性分布特征及其驱动因素[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(7): 182-191. |
| [8] | 杨菲菲,张王菲,赵磊,赵含,姬永杰,王梦金. 基于GF-1数据的二阶段遥感特征优选与森林地上生物量反演模型[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(4): 9-19. |
| [9] | 葛晓宁,许新桥,张怀清,张京,杨杰,崔泽宇,傅汝饶,梁金洁,邹添华,王林龙,刘洋. 林木基因型-环境互作算法研究进展与思考[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(3): 1-15. |
| [10] | 李倩,张帆,孟祥雪,吴小云,庞建壮,许行,张志强. 基于分解重构与机器学习的华北平原杨树人工林净碳交换模拟[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(12): 72-82. |
| [11] | 潘丹,罗璐薏,季凯文,孔凡斌. 农村电子商务发展对林区内部收入差距与共同富裕的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(5): 35-50. |
| [12] | 沈琛琛,肖文发,朱建华,曾立雄,陈吉臻,黄志霖. 基于机器学习算法的华中天然林土壤有机碳特征与关键影响因子[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(3): 65-77. |
| [13] | 杨晓慧,吴金卓,刘浩然,钟浩,林文树. 基于UAV-LiDAR的人工林林分郁闭度估测[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(8): 12-21. |
| [14] | 焦强英,韩宗甫,王炜烨,刘迪,潘鹏旭,李博,张念慈,王萍,陶金花,范萌. 基于多源数据和机器学习方法的大兴安岭地区雷击火驱动因子及火险预测模型[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(6): 74-87. |
| [15] | 王薇,赵涵,黄欣,侯卓梁,姜在民,蔡靖. 白杨无性系叶片水力及经济性状与生物量的关系[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(10): 89-98. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||