浙江省山区26县森林生态产品价值实现对城乡收入差距的影响

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20220776

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 在推进全体人民共同富裕的宏伟目标背景下, 研究森林生态产品价值实现效率对浙江省山区26县城乡收入差距的影响机制, 以期为森林资源富集山区县建立生态产品价值实现机制以及促进共同富裕的规划和政策的制定提供科学依据。方法: 利用浙江省山区26县2001—2020年统计数据, 借助地理信息系统(ArcGIS)、InVEST模型以及Super-SBM模型对森林生态产品价值实现效率进行测算, 运用双向固定效应模型检验森林生态产品价值实现效率对城乡收入差距的影响, 明确影响的路径机制。结果: 1) 2001—2020年浙江省山区26县森林生态产品价值实现效率得到显著提高, 表现为中高效率县区数量的明显增加, 生态发展县的森林生态产品价值实现效率高于跨越发展县, 县(区)间空间分异特征随时间演变逐渐减小。2)森林生态产品价值实现效率提高对于缩小26县城乡收入差距具有积极作用, 且对于跨越发展县缩小城乡收入差距的边际效应更大。3)森林生态产品价值实现效率的提高缩小城乡收入差距主要是通过纯技术效率实现, 规模效率对于城乡收入差距的影响并不显著。结论: 浙江省山区26县森林生态产品价值实现效果实现大幅度提升, 在探索"两山"转化模式方面取得了显著成效; 山区26县应注意优化城乡资源配置, 提高对外开放程度, 保护林地资源, 抓好技术创新并加大林业科研投入, 继续利用好森林资源优势持续促进山区26县经济增长, 从而不断缩小城乡收入差距。

关键词: 森林生态产品, 价值实现, 效率, 收入差距

Abstract:

Objective: Within the context of common prosperity for all people, this paper studies the influencing mechanism of the value realization efficiency of forest ecological products on the income gap between urban and rural areas in 26 counties in mountainous areas of Zhejiang Province, in order to provide a scientific basis for the establishment of the value realization mechanism of ecological products and the planning and policy formulation for promoting common prosperity in mountainous counties with rich forest resources. Method: Based on the statistical data of 26 counties in mountainous areas of Zhejiang Province from 2001 to 2020, the value realization efficiency of forest ecological products was measured by means of geographic information system (ArcGIS), InVEST model and Super-SBM model.The two-way fixed effect model was used to test the impact of the value realization efficiency of forest ecological products on the urban-rural income gap, and the path mechanism of the impact was clarified. Result: 1) From 2001 to 2020, the value realization efficiency of forest ecological products in 26 counties in mountainous areas of Zhejiang Province has been significantly improved, which is manifested in the obvious increase of the number of the medium and high-efficiency areas.The value realization efficiency of forest ecological products in ecological development counties is higher than that in leap-forward development counties.2) The efficiency improvement of value realization of forest ecological products has a positive effect on narrowing the urban-rural income gap in 26 counties and has a greater marginal effect on narrowing the urban-rural income gap in leap-forward development counties.3) The improvement of value realization efficiency of forest ecological products narrowing urban-rural income gap is mainly achieved through pure technical efficiency, and the impact of scale efficiency on urban-rural income gap is not significant. Conclusion: The value realization effect of forest ecological products in 26 counties in mountainous areas of Zhejiang Province has been greatly improved, and remarkable achievements have been made in exploring the transformation mode of "two mountains".The 26 counties in the mountainous area should pay attention to optimizing the allocation of fiscal expenditure scale, improving the degree of opening to the outside world, grasping technological innovation and increasing investment in forestry scientific research, and continue to make good use of the advantages of forest resources to continuously promote the economic growth of 26 counties in mountainous areas, so as to continuously narrow the income gap between urban and rural areas.

Key words: forest ecological products, value realization, efficiency, income gap

中图分类号:

S757
F326.2

孔凡斌,王宁,徐彩瑶,陆雨,沈月琴. 浙江省山区26县森林生态产品价值实现对城乡收入差距的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(1): 44-58.

Fanbin Kong,Ning Wang,Caiyao Xu,Yu Lu,Yueqin Shen. Impact of Value Realization of Forest Ecological Products on Urban-Rural Income Gap in 26 Mountainous Counties of Zhejiang Province[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(1): 44-58.

图/表 10

表1

表2

表3

表4

表5

图1

表6

表7

表8

表9

参考文献 0

	陈志钢, 茅锐, 张云飞. 城乡融合发展与共同富裕: 内涵、国际经验与实现路径. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2022, 52 (7): 68- 78.
	Chen Z G , Mao R , Zhang Y F . Integrated urban-rural development and common prosperity: connotation, international experience and implementation path. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2022, 52 (7): 68- 78.
	程文杰, 孔凡斌, 徐彩瑶. 国家试点区森林调节类生态产品价值转化效率初探. 林业经济问题, 2022, 42 (4): 354- 362. doi: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.20220063
	Cheng W J , Kong F B , Xu C Y . Study on the conversion efficiency of forest regulating ecological products value in the national pilot areas. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2022, 42 (4): 354- 362. doi: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.20220063
	窦亚权, 杨琛, 赵晓迪, 等. 森林生态产品价值实现的理论与路径选择. 林业科学, 2022, 58 (7): 1- 11.
	Dou Y Q , Yang C , Zhao X D , et al. Theory of and approach to realizing the value of forest ecological products. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58 (7): 1- 11.
	冯菁, 程堂仁, 夏自谦. 森林覆盖率较高地区经济落后现象研究. 西北林学院学报, 2008, (1): 224- 228.
	Feng J , Cheng T R , Xia Z Q . Economic backwardness in the area rich in forest. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2008, (1): 224- 228.
	冯梦黎, 王军. 城镇化对城乡收入差距的影响. 城市问题, 2018, (1): 26- 33. doi: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.180104
	Feng M L , Wang J . The impact of urbanization on urban-rural income gap. Urban Problem, 2018, (1): 26- 33. doi: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.180104
	傅斌, 徐佩, 王玉宽, 等. 都江堰市水源涵养功能空间格局. 生态学报, 2013, 33 (3): 789- 797.
	Fu B , Xu P , Wang Y K , et al. Spatial pattern of water retention in Dujiangyan County. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33 (3): 0789- 0797.
	郭韦杉, 李国平. 欠发达地区实现共同富裕的主抓手: 生态产品价值实现机制. 上海经济研究, 2022, (2): 76- 84.
	Guo W S , Li G P . The key of realizing common prosperity in underdeveloped areas: The value realization mechanism of ecological goods. Shanghai Economic Review, 2022, (2): 76- 84.
	侯建坤, 陈建军, 张凯琪, 等. 基于InVEST和GeoSoS-FLUS模型的黄河源区碳储量时空变化特征及其对未来不同情景模式的响应. 环境科学, 2022, 43 (11): 1- 14.
	Hou J K , Chen J J , Zhang K Q , et al. Temporal and spatial variation characteristics of carbon storage in the source region of the Yellow River based on InVEST and GeoSoS-FLUS models and its response to different future scenarios. Environmental Science, 2022, 43 (11): 1- 14.
	侯孟阳, 邓元杰, 姚顺波, 等. 考虑空间溢出效应的森林质量与经济增长关系EKC检验. 林业科学, 2020, 56 (12): 145- 156.
	Hou M Y , Deng Y J , Yao S B , et al. EKC test of the relationship between forest quality and economic growth considering spatial spillover effects. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56 (12): 145- 156.
	胡晶晶. 中国城乡居民收入差距对经济效率影响的测度——基于1991—2010年省级面板数据的经验分析. 学习与探索, 2013, (7): 86- 89.
	Hu J J . The measurement of the impact of income gap between urban and rural residents on economic efficiency in China——empirical analysis based on provincial panel data from 1991 to 2010. Study & Exploration, 2013, (7): 86- 89.
	胡胜, 曹明明, 刘琪, 等. 不同视角下InVEST模型的土壤保持功能对比. 地理研究, 2014, 33 (12): 2393- 2406.
	Hu S , Cao M M , Liu Q , et al. Comparative study on the soil conservation function of InVEST model under different perspectives. Geographical Reasearch, 2014, 33 (12): 2393- 2406.
	孔凡斌, 王宁, 徐彩瑶. "两山"理念发源地森林生态产品价值实现效率. 林业科学, 2022a, 58 (7): 12- 22.
	Kong F B , Wang N , Xu C Y . Value realization efficiency of forest ecological products in the birthplace of "Two Mountains " idea. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58 (7): 12- 22.
	孔凡斌, 徐彩瑶, 陈胜东. 中国生态扶贫共建共享机制研究. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2022b: 184- 190.
	Kong F B , Xu C Y , Chen S D . Research on co-construction and sharing mechanism of ecological poverty alleviation in China. Beijiing: China Agricultural Publishing House, 2022b: 184- 190.
	雷明. 两山理论与绿色减贫. 经济研究参考, 2015, (64): 21- 22. 21-22, 28
	Lei M . The two mountains theory and green poverty reduction. Economic Research Reference, 2015, (64): 21- 22. 21-22, 28
	李子叶, 韩先锋, 冯根福. 中国城市化进程扩大了城乡收入差距吗——基于中国省级面板数据的经验分析. 经济学家, 2016, (2): 69- 74.
	Li Z Y , Han X F , Feng G F . Does China's urbanization expand urban-rural income gap — an empirical analysis based on China's provincial panel data. Economist, 2016, (2): 69- 74.
	刘刚, 衣保中. 城乡收入差距对区域全要素生产率的影响. 北方论丛, 2016, (3): 154- 160.
	Liu G , Yi B Z . The influence of urban-rural income gap on regional total factor productivity. Northern Forum, 2016, (3): 154- 160.
	刘业轩, 石晓丽, 史文娇. 福建省森林生态系统水源涵养服务评估: InVEST模型与meta分析对比. 生态学报, 2021, 41 (4): 1349- 1361.
	Liu Y X , Shi X L , Shi W J . Evaluation of water retention services of forest ecosystems in Fujian Province: comparison between results from the InVEST model and meta-analysis. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41 (4): 1349- 1361.
	刘宗飞, 姚顺波, 刘越. 基于空间面板模型的森林"资源诅咒"研究. 资源科学, 2015, 37 (2): 379- 390.
	Liu Z F , Yao S B , Liu Y . Forest 'resource curse' based on spatial panel modeling. Resources Science, 2015, 37 (2): 379- 390.
	刘宗飞, 赵伟峰. 森林资源异质性对收入不平等的影响——基于1986—2012年省际面板数据. 农林经济管理学报, 2018, 17 (4): 445- 454.
	Liu Z F , Zhao W F . Influence of forest resource heterogeneity on income inequality: based on provincial panel data from 1986 to 2012. Journal of Agro－Forestry Economics and Management, 2018, 17 (4): 445- 454.
	陆铭, 陈钊. 城市化、城市倾向的经济政策与城乡收入差距. 经济研究, 2004, (6): 50- 58.
	Lu M , Chen Z . Urbanization, urban-biased economic policies and urban-rural inequality. Economic Research Journal, 2004, (6): 50- 58.
	罗佳, 黎蕾, 姜芸, 等. 湖南省森林生态系统服务功能价值评估. 生态科学, 2022, 41 (4): 70- 77.
	Luo J , Li L , Jiang Y , et al. Evaluation of service function of forest ecosystem in Hunan province. Ecological Science, 2022, 41 (4): 70- 77.
	马国霞, 於方, 王金南, 等. 中国2015年陆地生态系统生产总值核算研究. 中国环境科学, 2017, 37 (4): 1474- 1482.
	Ma G X , Yu F , Wang J N. , et al. Measuring gross ecosystem product (GEP) of 2015 for terrestrial ecosystems in China. China Environmental Science, 2017, 37 (4): 1474- 1482.
	汝刚, 刘慧, 任志安. 资源禀赋对城乡收入差距的影响——来自中国主要能源生产省份的面板数据和经验. 金融与经济, 2016, (6): 4- 10. 4-10, 82
	Ru G , Liu H , Ren Z A . The impact of resource endowments on the urban-rural income gap — panel data and experience from China 's major energy producing provinces. Journal of Finance and Economicss, (6): 4- 10. 4-10, 82
	沈满洪. 生态经济学. 北京: 中国环境出版社, 2016.
	Shen M H . Ecological economics. Beijing: China Environment Press, 2016.
	宋红军. 对外贸易、全要素生产率与地区收入差距. 理论探索, 2011, (6): 70- 73.
	Song H J . Foreign trade, total factor productivity and regional income gap. Theoretical Exploration, 2011, (6): 70- 73.
	孙文浩, 卞建民, 李一涵, 等. 长白山北坡流域水资源涵养功能与矿泉水开发阈值研究. 水资源与水工程学报, 2022, 33 (3): 89- 97.
	Sun W H , Bian J M , Li Y H , et al. Study on the water conservation function and mineral water development threshold of northern slope watershed, Changbai Mountain. Journal of Water Resources &Water Engineering, 33 (3): 89- 97.
	王宾. 共同富裕视角下乡村生态产品价值实现: 基本逻辑与路径选择. 中国农村经济, 2022, (6): 129- 143.
	Wang B . The value realization of rural ecological products from the perspective of common prosperity: basic logic and value realization path choice. Chinese Rural Economy, 2022, (6): 129- 143.
	王兵, 任晓旭, 胡文. 中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评估. 林业科学, 2011, 47 (2): 145- 153.
	Wang B. , Ren X X , Hu W . Assessment of forest ecosystem services value in China. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47 (2): 145- 153.
	王莉雁, 肖燚, 欧阳志云, 等. 国家级重点生态功能区县生态系统生产总值核算研究——以阿尔山市为例. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27 (3): 146- 154.
	Wang L Y , Xiao Y , Ouyang Z Y , et al. Gross ecosystem product accounting in the national key ecological function area. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27 (3): 146.
	王亚男, 张明斗. 农业产业集聚与城乡收入差距——基于社会资本调节效应的再考察. 江汉论坛, 2022, (10): 27- 37.
	Wang Y N , Zhang M D . Agricultural industry agglomeration and urban-rural income gap - a re-examination based on the moderating effect of social capital. Jianghan Forum, 2022, (10): 27- 37.
	蔚芳, 詹小稳. 基于生境质量与碳储量的城市刚性开发边界划定. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2019, 53 (8): 1478- 1487.
	Wei F , Zhan X W . Delineation of rigid urban growth boundary based on habitat quality and carbon storage. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2019, 53 (8): 1478- 1487.
	吴之见, 杜思敏, 黄云, 等. 基于生态系统生产总值核算的生态保护成效评估——以赣南地区为例. 生态学报, 2022, 42 (16): 1- 14.
	Wu Z J , Du S M , Huang Y , et al. Assessment of ecological conservation effect in southern Jiangxi Province base on gross ecosystem product. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42 (16): 1- 14.
	许联芳, 张海波, 张明阳, 等. 南方丘陵山地带土壤保持功能及其经济价值时空变化特征. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24 (9): 1599- 1605.
	Xu L F , Zhang H B , Zhang M Y , et al. Spatial-temporal variation characteristics of the soil conservation function and its economic value in the southern hill and mountain area, China. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2015, 24 (9): 1599- 1605.
	徐伟, 李直儒, 施慧斌, 等. 基于Super-SBM模型和Malmquist指数的中国工业创新效率评价. 宏观经济研究, 2021, (5): 55- 68.
	Xu W , Li Z R , Shi H B , et al. Evaluation of China's industrial innovation efficiency based on Super-SBM model and Malmquist index. Macro Economic Study, 2021, (5): 55- 68.
	严立冬, 陈光炬, 刘加林, 等. 生态资本构成要素解析——基于生态经济学文献的综述. 中南财经政法大学学报, 2010, (5): 3- 9. 3-9, 142
	Yan L D , Chen G J , Liu J L , et al. On constituents of ecological capital: based on ecological economics literature. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 2010, (5): 3- 9. 3-9, 142
	杨守德, 杨倩. 农业生产性服务业对城乡收入差距的影响及路径研究——基于24个省份面板数据的中介效应检验. 林业经济, 2022, 44 (12): 1- 17.
	Yang S D , Yang Q . Impact and path research of agricultural productive services on urban-rural income gap——mediating effect model test based on 24 provincial panel data. Foresty Economics, 2022, 44 (12): 1- 17.
	于丽瑶, 石田, 郭静静. 森林生态产品价值实现机制构建. 林业资源管理, 2019, (6): 28- 31. 28-31, 61
	Yu L Y , Shi T , Guo J J . Developing mechanisms to realize the value of forest ecological products. Forest Resources Management, 2019, (6): 28- 31. 28-31, 61
	俞彤晖. 流通产业集聚、地区经济效率与城乡收入差距. 经济经纬, 2018, 35 (4): 94- 100.
	Yu T H . Circulation industry agglomeration, regional economic efficiency and urban-rural income gap. Economic Survey, 2018, 35 (4): 94- 100.
	张爱英, 孟维福. 普惠金融、农业全要素生产率和城乡收入差距. 东岳论丛, 2021, 42 (9): 63- 76. 63-76, 191
	Zhang A Y , Meng W F . Inclusive finance, agricultural total factor productivity and urban-rural income gap. Dongyue Tribune, 2021, 42 (9): 63- 76. 63-76, 191
	张玉昌, 陈保启. 产业结构、空间溢出与城乡收入差距——基于空间Durbin模型偏微分效应分解. 经济问题探索, 2018, (9): 62- 71.
	Zhang Y C , Chen B Q . Industrial structure, spatial spillover and urban-rural income gap-partial differential effect decomposition based on spatial Durbin model. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2018, (9): 62- 71.
	张子贤, 孙伯驰. 公共服务供给效率对城乡收入差距的影响及其提升路径. 求索, 2022, (1): 152- 164.
	Zhang Z X , Sun B C . The influence of public service supply efficiency on urban-rural income gap and its improving path. Seeker, 2022, (1): 152- 164.
	Canadell J , Jackson R B , Ehleringer J B , et al. Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Oecologia, 1996, 108 (4): 583- 595.
	Tone K . A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 143 (1): 32- 41.
	Wang N , Xu C Y , Kong F B . Value realization and optimization path of forest ecological products—case study from Zhejiang Province, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19 (12): 7538.
	Yang J , Huang X . The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019. Earth System Science Data, 2021, 13 (8): 3907- 3925.

类别 Category	一级指标 Primary index	二级指标 Secondary index	三级指标 Tertiary index	评估方法 Methods
投入指标 Input indicators	森林生态产品价值 The value of forest ecological products	物质产品价值 Material product value	林产品 Forest products	市场价值法 Market value method
		调节服务价值 Regulating service value	涵养水源 Conservation of water sources	市场价值法/替代成本法/影子工程法 Market value method/alternative costing/shadow engineering
			固碳释氧 Carbon fixation and oxygen release
			空气净化 Air purification
			土壤保持 Soil conservation
		文化服务价值 Cultural service value	森林休憩 Forest rest	旅行费用法 Travel expense law
	劳动力 Labor	林业从业人数 Number of forestry practitioners
	物质资本 Physical capital	林业固定资产投资完成额 Amount of forestry fixed assets investment
产出指标 Output indicators	林业产业产值 Output value of forestry industry	林业第一/二/三产业产值 Output value of primary/secondary/tertiary forestry industry

变量名称 Variable	观测值 Observed value	均值 Mean	标准误 Standard error	最小值 Minimum	最大值 Maximum
城乡收入差距 Urban-rural income gap	520	0.091	0.054	0	0.344
森林生态产品价值实现效率 Value realization efficiency of forest ecological products	520	0.766	1.217	0.044	21.139
经济发展水平 Economic development level	520	10.035	0.781	8.204	12.425
城镇化率 Urbanization rate	520	0.218	0.126	0.043	0.602
产业结构 Industrial structure	520	0.122	0.065	0.003	0.383
政府财政支出规模 Government expenditure scale	520	0.200	0.117	0	0.713
基础设施 Infrastructure	520	0.74	0.445	0.046	6.481
对外开放程度 Degree of opening to the outside world	520	0.164	0.140	0	0.894
林地面积 Forest area	520	7.260	0.516	5.579	8.378
纯技术效率 Pure technical efficiency	520	0.998	1.640	0.047	24.292
规模效率 Scale effiency	520	0.868	0.171	0.026	1.000

所属地市 City of location	26县 26 counties	2001	2005	2010	2015	2020
杭州 Hangzhou	淳安县Chun’an	14.125	3.946	3.262	2.218	1.950
台州 Taizhou	仙居县Xianju	0.239	0.191	1.352	0.415	0.248
	三门县Sanmen	1.390	0.367	2.184	1.252	1.063
	天台县Tiantai	0.754	0.188	1.433	0.576	0.628
丽水 Lishui	遂昌县Suichang	0.382	0.367	0.471	0.680	0.754
	青田县Qingtian	0.219	0.196	0.247	0.374	0.723
	云和县Yunhe	0.436	0.528	0.445	0.582	0.692
	缙云县Jinyun	0.444	0.339	0.407	0.647	0.893
	松阳县Songyang	0.542	0.486	0.742	1.000	0.857
	龙泉市Longquan	0.445	0.385	0.459	0.573	0.766
	庆元县Qingyuan	0.234	0.259	0.408	0.769	0.767
	莲都区Liandu	1.137	1.015	1.033	1.054	1.078
	景宁县Jingning	0.386	0.307	0.401	0.491	0.664
温州 Wenzhou	苍南县Cangnan	0.124	0.274	0.603	1.165	1.016
	平阳县Pingyang	0.162	0.283	0.458	0.747	0.985
	永嘉县Yongjia	0.091	0.136	0.323	1.069	0.742
	泰顺县Taishun	0.095	0.142	0.251	0.340	0.730
	文成县Wencheng	0.044	0.084	0.178	0.139	0.271
金华 Jinhua	磐安县Panan	1.020	0.890	0.369	1.040	1.000
金华 Jinhua	武义县Wuyi	0.579	1.173	1.045	1.042	1.000
衢州 Quzhou	龙游县Longyou	1.126	1.212	1.014	1.123	1.109
	柯城区Kecheng	0.142	1.019	1.111	1.104	0.736
	开化县Kaihua	0.586	0.375	0.243	0.430	0.404
	衢江区Qujiang	1.031	0.733	1.009	0.615	0.512
	常山县Changshan	0.637	0.628	0.205	1.018	0.744
	江山市Jiangshan	1.036	0.530	1.048	0.562	0.462
	均值Average	1.054	0.617	0.796	0.809	0.800

跨越发展县 Spanning development counties		生态发展县 Ecological development counties
县 County	森林生态产品价值实现效率 Value realization efficiency of forest ecological products	县 County	森林生态产品价值实现效率 Value realization efficiency of forest ecological products
平阳县Pingyang	0.552	遂昌县Suichang	0.487
龙游县Longyou	1.143	磐安县Panan	0.877
青田县Qingtian	0.382	云和县Yunhe	0.449
仙居县Xianju	0.467	开化县Kaihua	0.467
柯城区Kecheng	1.064	苍南县Cangnan	0.614
武义县Wuyi	0.953	常山县Changshan	0.728
缙云县Jinyun	0.513	龙泉市Longquan	0.501
松阳县Songyang	0.635	文成县Wencheng	0.120
衢江区Qujiang	0.775	淳安县Chuanan	4.206
永嘉县Yongjia	0.293	庆元县Qingyuan	0.472
江山市Jiangshan	0.772	泰顺县Taishun	0.274
三门县Sanmen	1.105	景宁县Jingning	0.395
天台县Tiantai	0.598	—	—
莲都区Liandu	1.065	—	—
平均值Average	0.737	平均值Average	0.799

年份Year	基于泰尔指数计算的结果 Results based on Theil index calculation			基于城乡收入比计算的结果 Results based on urban-rural income ratio
年份Year	26县 26 counties	跨越发展县 Spanning development counties	生态发展县 Ecological development counties	26县 26 counties	跨越发展县 Spanning development counties	生态发展县 Ecological development counties
2001	0.15	0.14	0.13	3.62	3.47	3.22
2002	0.15	0.12	0.14	3.51	3.29	3.14
2003	0.15	0.13	0.14	3.49	3.33	2.98
2004	0.13	0.12	0.12	3.29	3.14	2.91
2005	0.13	0.11	0.13	3.20	3.03	2.78
2006	0.12	0.11	0.12	3.08	2.93	2.67
2007	0.12	0.11	0.11	3.01	2.92	2.56
2008	0.11	0.10	0.11	2.87	2.77	2.35
2009	0.10	0.09	0.09	2.71	2.69	2.23
2010	0.08	0.08	0.08	2.56	2.52	2.14
2011	0.08	0.07	0.07	2.45	2.41	2.17
2012	0.08	0.07	0.07	2.39	2.28	2.07
2013	0.07	0.06	0.07	2.34	2.27	1.78
2014	0.05	0.04	0.04	2.06	2.04	1.76
2015	0.06	0.05	0.06	2.03	2.01	1.75
2016	0.06	0.05	0.06	2.03	2.01	1.74
2017	0.06	0.05	0.06	2.01	2.00	1.73
2018	0.06	0.05	0.05	2.00	1.98	1.71
2019	0.06	0.05	0.05	1.98	1.96	1.67
2020	0.05	0.04	0.05	1.92	1.90	3.22