Objective: The study aims to determine how growth rate of middle-aged Chinese fir responds to understory management. Method: This study was conducted in the framework of an understory management experiment ofsubtropical middle-aged Chinese fir established in 2013. The plantation on the platform was established in 1998. Weset a paired-treatment experiment, with understory left intact in one treatment (CK) and understory removed for the other treatment(UR). By 2016, trees with DBH classes of 12-14 cm and 16-18 cm accounted for 42.6% in CK treatment and 77.1% in UR treatment. During 2016-2018, we studied the stoichiometry, resource acquisition and utilization efficiency, carbon allocation patterns (e.g., structural vs non-structural carbohydrates (NSC) allocations and NSC allocations among different organs) and relative growth rate (RGR) of trees withthese two DBHclasses. Result: The effects of understory removal on the RGR of middle-aged Chinese fir depended on DBH. The understory removal had no significant effect on the RGR of the Chinese fir with 12-14 cm DBH, however decreased the RGR of the Chinese fir with 16-18 cm DBH. For the Chinese fir of 12-14 cm and 16-18 cm DBH classes, the understory removal had no significant effect on the maximum photosynthetic rate, instantaneous water-use efficiency, instantaneous nitrogen-use efficiency, leaf total nitrogen (N) content, leaf total phosphorus (P) content, leaf N/P, leaf NSC(NSCleaf), branch NSC(NSCbranch), and trunk NSC(NSCtrunk). For the Chinese fir with16-18 cm DBH, understory removal significantly reduced the NSC of new leaves (especially soluble sugar, SS), increased NSCtrunk/RGR and NSCleaf/RGR (indicatinga priority of carbon storage over growth), and thus decreased the RGR. For the Chinese fir with 12-14 cm DBH, although the understory removal significantly increased the ratio of new leaf SS and old leaf SS, the NSCleaf/RGR was the main factor in regulating the RGR and the understory removal did not significantly affect NSCleaf/RGR of Chinese fir with this DBH class. Conclusion: The DBH-dependent effects of understory removal on the growth rate of middle-aged Chinese fir are mainly controlled by carbon allocation rather than by nutrient stoichiometry, resource acquisition efficiency, and utilization efficiency. Objective: The study aims to determine how growth rate of middle-aged Chinese fir responds to understory management. Method: This study was conducted in the framework of an understory management experiment ofsubtropical middle-aged Chinese fir established in 2013. The plantation on the platform was established in 1998. Weset a paired-treatment experiment, with understory left intact in one treatment (CK) and understory removed for the other treatment(UR). By 2016, trees with DBH classes of 12-14 cm and 16-18 cm accounted for 42.6% in CK treatment and 77.1% in UR treatment. During 2016-2018, we studied the stoichiometry, resource acquisition and utilization efficiency, carbon allocation patterns (e.g., structural vs non-structural carbohydrates (NSC) allocations and NSC allocations among different organs) and relative growth rate (RGR) of trees withthese two DBHclasses. Result: The effects of understory removal on the RGR of middle-aged Chinese fir depended on DBH. The understory removal had no significant effect on the RGR of the Chinese fir with 12-14 cm DBH, however decreased the RGR of the Chinese fir with 16-18 cm DBH. For the Chinese fir of 12-14 cm and 16-18 cm DBH classes, the understory removal had no significant effect on the maximum photosynthetic rate, instantaneous water-use efficiency, instantaneous nitrogen-use efficiency, leaf total nitrogen (N) content, leaf total phosphorus (P) content, leaf N/P, leaf NSC(NSCleaf), branch NSC(NSCbranch), and trunk NSC(NSCtrunk). For the Chinese fir with16-18 cm DBH, understory removal significantly reduced the NSC of new leaves (especially soluble sugar, SS), increased NSCtrunk/RGR and NSCleaf/RGR (indicatinga priority of carbon storage over growth), and thus decreased the RGR. For the Chinese fir with 12-14 cm DBH, although the understory removal significantly increased the ratio of new leaf SS and old leaf SS, the NSCleaf/RGR was the main factor in regulating the RGR and the understory removal did not significantly affect NSCleaf/RGR of Chinese fir with this DBH class. Conclusion: The DBH-dependent effects of understory removal on the growth rate of middle-aged Chinese fir are mainly controlled by carbon allocation rather than by nutrient stoichiometry, resource acquisition efficiency, and utilization efficiency.