基于激光雷达的北京市主要林分因子联立模型构建与应用

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20250309

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective: The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility of establishing models for major stand characteristics based on LiDAR data to estimate the factors of forest patches, providing a demonstration for promoting the application of LiDAR technology in integrated monitoring of the national forest and grassland. Method: Based on the LiDAR point cloud metrics and ground measured data of 1 966 forest plots in Beijing, the error-in-variable simultaneous equations were used to construct 8 forest factor estimation models for 13 forest types, including mean diameter at breast height (DBH), mean height, dominant height, stem number, basal area, stock volume, biomass and carbon storage. Additionally, based on the LiDAR point cloud metrics extracted from the 25 m×25 m grid cells within the forest patches in Beijing, the eight prediction models were used to estimate major stand characteristics of all forest patches. Result: 1) The LiDAR point cloud metrics that contributed the most to the estimation of major stand characteristics were 80% quantile of cumulative height and median point cloud height, followed by leaf area index. 2) The mean prediction errors (MPEs) of eight major stand characteristics models for 13 forest types were less than 15% in either self-validation or cross-validation. 3) Taking the forest as a whole, the determination coefficient (R²) of all eight prediction models were all above 0.7 (excluding the stem number per hectare), the MPEs were less than 3%, and the mean percentage standard errors (MPSEs) were less than 40%, among which the MPSEs of the mean DBH, mean height and dominant height models were about 15%. 4) According to the model inversion, the cumulative value of stock volume in all forest patches estimated by the volume model differed only by ?1.79% from that obtained by the integrated monitoring of the municipality. The differences between the stock volume of forest patches and the integrated monitoring results in the three sub-populations were only 1.04%, ?3.91% and ?5.44%, respectively, which were all within the allowable error range of sampling survey. Conclusion: 1) The LiDAR point cloud metrics that contribute the most to estimating the major stand characteristics are percentile 80 of heights distribution and median height, followed by leaf area index. However, the point cloud intensity and density metrics have no significant effect. 2) The method of error-in-variable simultaneous equations can be applied to construct the simultaneous models of major stand characteristics, which is able to solve both compatibility of different model parameters and error propagation of different stand characteristic estimates. 3) The eight prediction models for 13 forest types can be used to estimate the major stand characteristics of forest patches in Beijing. 4) The prediction accuracy of the major stand characteristics models based on LiDAR point cloud metrics can meet the technical requirements of forest resource inventory and monitoring, and the models can be applied in practice.

Key words: LiDAR data, major stand characteristics, error-in-variable, simultaneous models, Beijing

CLC Number:

S757

Weisheng Zeng,Xuexiang Wen,Han Fu,Xiangnan Sun,Kangmei Lü,Qiangyi Liu,Tian Wang. Establishment and Application of Simultaneous Models for Estimating Major Stand Characteristics in Beijing Based on LiDAR Data[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2026, 62(4): 68-80.

Figures/Tables 7

Fig.1

Table 1

Table 2

Parameter estimates of simultaneous models for 13 forest types"

森林类型 Forest type	林分因子 Stand factor	解释变量 Explanatory variable	参数估计值Parameter estimates
森林类型 Forest type	林分因子 Stand factor	解释变量 Explanatory variable	a₀~g₀	a₁~f₁	a₂~c₂	a₃~c₃	a₄~c₄
油松林 Pinus tabuliformis forest (n=200)	D	X₁、X₃、X₅	10.213 0	0.202 2	0.187 6	0.037 8
	H_d	X₁、X₃	2.238 1	?0.099 2	0.795 9
	G	X₄、X₅	2.433 3	0.586 0	0.663 5
	V	X₁、X₃、X₅	11.427 0	0.690 2	0.364 9	0.682 1
	H		0.031 7	0.836 1
	B		0.474 7	0.988 2
	C		0.509 3
侧柏林 Platycladus orientalis forest (n=100)	D	X₁、X₃、X₅	4.912 8	0.679 5	0.271 0	?0.097 9
	H_d	X₁、X₃	4.914 1	0.441 9	0.230 5
	G	X₄、X₅	0.684 0	1.470 0	0.473 1
	V	X₄、X₅	1.612 7	1.864 2	0.438 7
	H		?0.149 7	0.861 4
	B		0.981 3	1.329 7
	C		0.484 3
针叶混交林 Coniferous mixed forest (n=100)	D	X₁、X₂、X₅	4.100 4	0.396 0	0.313 4	?0.104 4
	H	X₂、X₄	2.874 4	0.111 6	0.444 2
	G	X₁、X₅	2.128 2	1.039 6	0.472 6
	V	X₁、X₅	5.514 7	1.444 9	0.507 1
	H_d		0.290 5	1.244 1
	B		2.441 4	1.180 1
	C		0.489 9
栎树林 Quercus spp. forest (n=200)	D	X₂、X₅	4.273 6	0.561 0	?0.124 6
	H_d	X₂、X₄	2.878 6	0.895 1	?0.346 7
	G	X₃、X₅	8.005 4	1.120 4	0.081 3
	V	X₃、X₄	22.55 7	1.185 6	0.305 7
	H		0.345 2	0.767 9
	B		3.072 4	1.350 2
	C		0.480 3
桦木林 Betula spp. forest (n=88)	D	X₁、X₂	1.307 4	?0.229 7	1.121 6
	H_d	X₂	2.197 8	0.707 4
	G	X₃、X₄	1.013 2	0.121 3	1.253 8
	V	X₃、X₄	3.389 6	0.380 7	1.376 5
	H		0.058 6	0.817 9
	B		3.776 8	1.098 0
	C		0.484 1
杨树林 Populus spp. forest (n=200)	D	X₁、X₂	3.925 5	0.110 7	0.572 5
	H_d	X₂	5.228 9	0.446 9
	G	X₂	0.558 3	1.198 6
	V	X₂	2.066 6	1.495 0
	H		?0.582 8	0.926 8
	B		1.304 9	0.802 5
	C		0.472 5
榆树林 Ulmus spp. forest (n=100)	D	X₂、X₅	2.488 9	0.806 9	?0.031 4
	H_d	X₂	2.129 4	0.744 5
	G	X₄、X₅	0.446 3	1.428 0	0.161 8
	V	X₄、X₅	1.055 4	1.778 8	0.153 7
	H		?0.133 1	0.871 9
	B		0.895 1	1.100 1
	C		0.449 4
刺槐林 Robinia pseudoacacia forest (n=100)	D	X₂、X₅	2.774 1	0.762 0	?0.033 7
	H	X₂	2.952 8	0.566 8
	G	X₂	0.222 2	1.625 1
	V	X₂	0.772 8	1.838 0
	H_d		0.125 2	1.144 2
	B		1.434 7	1.341 0
	C		0.482 9
柳树林 Salix spp. forest (n=88)	D	X₁、X₂	1.296 6	?0.198 0	1.103 0
	H	X₂	1.775 8	0.713 7
	G	X₃、X₄	1.159 0	0.262 9	1.144 8
	V	X₃、X₄	4.007 4	0.501 8	1.259 7
	H_d		0.027 6	1.216 7
	B		2.998 3	1.107 9
	C		0.484 2
乔木经济林 Economic forest of trees (n=90)	D	X₃、X₅	13.525 0	0.561 5	?0.105 3
	H_d	X₃	8.457 3	0.369 2
	G	X₃	6.283 6	1.003 0
	V	X₃	24.672 0	1.225 4
	H		0.941 4	0.739 9
	B		2.849 4	1.782 5
	C		0.483 7
其他硬阔林 Other hard broad-leaved forest (n=300)	D	X₂、X₅	3.595 5	0.695 9	?0.010 3
	H_d	X₂	2.870 8	0.594 4
	G	X₂、X₄	0.389 2	0.323 5	1.297 2
	V	X₂、X₄	0.857 8	0.542 9	1.434 9
	H		0.116 4	0.878 1
	B		2.198 5	1.512 5
	C		0.483 5
其他软阔林 Other soft broad-leaved forest (n=100)	D	X₁、X₂、X₄、X₅	2.268 1	0.644 6	1.380 1	?1.149 3	?0.106 3
	H_d	X₂、X₅	1.885 4	0.774 4	?0.071 5
	G	X₂	0.102 6	2.060 6
	V	X₂	0.202 3	2.436 3
	H		0.460 6	0.796 8
	B		1.944 9	1.259 6
	C		0.480 8
阔叶混交林 Broad-leaved mixed forest (n=300)	D	X₁、X₂、X₄、X₅	2.860 9	0.242 6	1.044 8	?0.583 1	?0.131 5
	H	X₂、X₅	2.487 6	0.593 4	?0.037 7
	G	X₁、X₃、X₅	2.400 7	0.722 5	0.676 3	0.225 8
	V	X₁、X₃、X₅	7.772 3	0.923 4	0.899 9	0.206 3
	H_d		?0.520 6	1.286 7
	B		4.350 3	1.181 6
	C		0.478 8

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

References 0

	曹　林, 代劲松, 徐建新, 等. 基于机载小光斑LiDAR技术的亚热带森林参数信息优化提取. 北京林业大学学报, 2014, 36 (5): 13- 21.
	Cao L, Dai J S, Xu J X, et al. Optimized extraction of forest parameters in subtropical forests based on airborne small footprint LiDAR technology. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2014, 36 (5): 13- 21.
	代华兵, 李春干, 庞　勇, 等. 基于天空地一体化森林资源调查的小班因子设置与信息获取方法. 林业资源管理, 2021, (1): 180- 188. doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2021.01.023
	Dai H B, Li C G, Pang Y, et al. Method for sub-compartment investigation factors setting and information acquisition based on integrated aerial-space-ground forest inventory system. Forest Resources Management, 2021, (1): 180- 188. doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2021.01.023
	丁志文, 邢艳秋, 尹伯卿, 等. 融合无人机和地基激光雷达点云数据估测单木结构参数. 森林工程, 2024, 40 (1): 142- 151. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8023.2024.01.017
	Ding Z W, Xing Y Q, Yin B Q, et al. Fusion of UAV and TLS LiDAR point cloud data for estimating individual tree structure parameters. Forest Engineering, 2024, 40 (1): 142- 151. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8023.2024.01.017
	范凤云. 2010,. 基于机载LiDAR和极化SAR数据的山区森林蓄积量估测方法研究. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院.
	Fan F Y. 2010,. Study on the estimation method of forest volume using airbrone LiDAR and polarimetric SAR over hilly region. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry. ［in Chinese］
	付　甜. 2010,. 基于机载激光雷达的亚热带森林参数估测. 合肥: 安徽农业大学.
	Fu T. 2010,. Estimation of forest parameters based on airborne laser scanning in subtropical zone. Hefei: Anhui Agricultural University. ［in Chinese］
	雷宇宙, 毛学刚. 结合UAV-LiDAR和Sentinel-2的森林蓄积量估测. 森林工程, 2023, 39 (6): 46- 54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8023.2023.06.001
	Lei Y Z, Mao X G. Integrating UAV-LiDAR and Sentinel-2 for growing stock volume estimation. Forest Engineering, 2023, 39 (6): 46- 54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8023.2023.06.001
	李春干, 李　振. 机载激光雷达大区域亚热带森林参数估测的普适性模型式. 林业科学, 2021, 57 (10): 23- 35.
	Li C G, Li Z. Generalizing predictive models of sub-tropical forest inventory attributes using an area-based approach with airborne LiDAR data. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57 (10): 23- 35.
	李苑鑫, 吴楚航, 邢艳秋. 基于地基激光雷达人工蒙古栎削度−二元材积方程的构建. 森林工程, 2025, 41 (1): 162- 173.
	Li Y X, Wu C H, Xing Y Q. Construction of a taper-binary volume equation for plantation Mongolian oak based on TLS data. Forest Engineering, 2025, 41 (1): 162- 173.
	李增元, 刘清旺, 庞　勇. 激光雷达森林参数反演研究进展. 遥感学报, 2016, 20 (5): 1138- 1150. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2024.11.07
	Li Z Y, Liu Q W, Pang Y. Review on forest parameters inversion using LiDAR. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2016, 20 (5): 1138- 1150. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2024.11.07
	刘鲁霞, 庞　勇. 机载激光雷达和地基激光雷达林业应用现状. 世界林业研究, 2014, 27 (1): 49- 56. doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2014.01.009
	Liu L X, Pang Y. Applications of airborne laser scanning and terrestrial laser scanning to forestry. World Forestry Research, 2014, 27 (1): 49- 56. doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2014.01.009
	刘清旺, 谭炳香, 胡凯龙, 等. 机载激光雷达和高光谱组合系统的亚热带森林估测遥感试验. 高技术通讯, 2016, 26 (3): 264- 274.
	Liu Q W, Tan B X, Hu K L, et al. The remote sensing experiment on airborne LiDAR and hyperspectral integrated system for subtropical forest estimation. Chinese High Technology Letters, 2016, 26 (3): 264- 274.
	庞　勇, 李增元. 基于机载激光雷达的小兴安岭温带森林组分生物量反演. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36 (10): 1095- 1105.
	Pang Y, Li Z Y. Inversion of biomass components of the temperate forest using airborne LiDAR technology in Xiaoxing’an Mountains, northeastern of China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36 (10): 1095- 1105.
	庞　勇, 李增元, 陈博伟, 等. 星载激光雷达森林探测进展及趋势. 上海航天, 2019, 36 (3): 20- 28. doi: 10.19328/j.cnki.1006-1630.2019.03.003
	Pang Y, Li Z Y, Chen B W, et al. Status and development of spaceborne LiDAR applications in forestry. Aerospace Shanghai, 2019, 36 (3): 20- 28. doi: 10.19328/j.cnki.1006-1630.2019.03.003
	薛春泉, 陈振雄, 杨加志, 等. 省市县一体化森林碳储量估测技术体系: 以广东省为例. 林业资源管理, 2022, (4): 157- 163.
	Xue C Q, Chen Z X, Yang J Z, et al. A provincial-municipal-county integrated forest carbon storage estimating technology system: take Guangdong Province as an example. Forest Resources Management, 2022, (4): 157- 163.
	杨明星, 徐天蜀, 牛晓花, 等. 基于Sentinel-1A雷达影像的思茅松林蓄积量估测. 西部林业科学, 2019, 48 (2): 52- 58.
	Yang M X, Xu T S, Niu X H, et al. Estimation of Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis forest stock volume based on Sentinel-1A SAR image. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2019, 48 (2): 52- 58.
	袁钰娜, 彭道黎, 王　威, 等. 利用机载激光雷达技术估测东北林区典型针叶林的蓄积量. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32 (3): 836- 844. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202103.001
	Yuan Y N, Peng D L, Wang W, et al. Estimating standing stocks of the typical conifer stands in northeast China based on airborne LiDAR data. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32 (3): 836- 844. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202103.001
	曾伟生, 孙乡楠, 王六如, 等. 基于机载激光雷达数据估计林分蓄积量及平均高和断面积. 林业资源管理, 2020, (2): 79- 86. doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2020.02.013
	Zeng W S, Sun X N, Wang L R, et al. Estimating forest volume, mean height and basal area based on airborne laser scanning data. Forest Resources Management, 2020, (2): 79- 86. doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2020.02.013
	曾伟生, 孙乡楠, 王六如, 等. 基于激光雷达数据的东北林区航空林分材积表编制. 林业资源管理, 2021a, (1): 147- 155. doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2021.01.019
	Zeng W S, Sun X N, Wang L R, et al. Developing aerial stand volume tables based on laser scanning data for forest region of northeast China. Forest Resources Management, 2021a, (1): 147- 155. doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2021.01.019
	曾伟生, 孙乡楠, 王六如, 等. 基于机载激光雷达数据的森林蓄积量模型研建. 林业科学, 2021b, 57 (2): 31- 38.
	Zeng W S, Sun X N, Wang L R, et al. Development of forest stand volume models based on airborne laser scanning data. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021b, 57 (2): 31- 38.
	曾伟生, 孙乡楠, 王六如, 等. 东北林区10种主要森林类型的蓄积量、生物量和碳储量模型研建. 北京林业大学学报, 2021c, 43 (3): 1- 8. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200058
	Zeng W S, Sun X N, Wang L R, et al. Developing stand volume, biomass and carbon stock models for ten major forest types in forest region of northeastern China. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021c, 43 (3): 1- 8. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200058
	曾伟生, 唐守正. 立木生物量方程的优度评价和精度分析. 林业科学, 2011a, 47 (11): 106- 113.
	Zeng W S, Tang S Z. Goodness evaluation and precision analysis of tree biomass equations. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011a, 47 (11): 106- 113.
	曾伟生, 唐守正. 2011b. 非线性模型对数回归的偏差校正及与加权回归的对比分析. 林业科学研究, 24(2): 137-143.
	Zeng W S, Tang S Z. 2011b. Bias correction in logarithmic regression and comparison with weighted regression for non-linear models. Forest Research, 24(2): 137-143. ［in Chinese］
	曾伟生, 杨学云, 孙乡楠, 等. 森林资源调查监测中各级储量数据的一体化方法研究. 林业资源管理, 2022, (4): 13- 19.
	Zeng W S, Yang X Y, Sun X N, et al. A study on integration of forest stock data at different levels in forest inventory and monitoring. Forest Resources Management, 2022, (4): 13- 19.
	周相贝, 李春干, 代华兵, 等. 点云密度对机载激光雷达大区域亚热带森林参数估测精度的影响. 林业科学, 2023, 59 (9): 23- 33.
	Zhou X B, Li C G, Dai H B, et al. Effects of point cloud density on the estimation accuracy of large-area subtropical forest inventory attributes using airborne LiDAR data. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59 (9): 23- 33.
	赵　峰, 李增元, 王韵晟, 等. 机载激光雷达(LiDAR)数据在森林资源调查中的应用综述. 遥感信息, 2008, 23 (1): 106- 110, 53.
	Zhao F, Li Z Y, Wang Y S, et al. The application of LiDAR data in forest. Remote Sensing Information, 2008, 23 (1): 106- 110, 53.
	邹文涛, 曾伟生, 孙乡楠. 基于机载激光雷达数据估计主要森林参数联立模型. 中南林业调查规划, 2024, 43 (4): 32- 38. doi: 10.16166/j.cnki.cn43-1095.2024.04.007
	Zou W T, Zeng W S, Sun X N. Joint modeling for estimating major forest parameters based on airborne laser scanning data. Central South Forest Inventory and Planning, 2024, 43 (4): 32- 38. doi: 10.16166/j.cnki.cn43-1095.2024.04.007
	Bottalico F, Chirici G, Giannini R, et al. Modeling Mediterranean forest structure using airborne laser scanning data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2017, 57, 145- 153. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2016.12.013
	Bouvier M, Durrieu S, Fournier R A, et al. Generalizing predictive models of forest inventory attributes using an area-based approach with airborne LiDAR data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2015, 156 (1): 322- 334.
	González-Ferreiro E, Diéguez-Aranda U, Miranda D. Estimation of stand variables in Pinus radiata D. Don plantations using different LiDAR pulse densities. Forestry, 2012, 85 (2): 281- 292. doi: 10.1093/forestry/cps002
	Hollaus M, Dorigo W, Wagner W, et al. Operational wide-area stem volume estimation based on airborne laser scanning and national forest inventory data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2009, 30 (19): 5159- 5175. doi: 10.1080/01431160903022894
	Holmgren J. Prediction of tree height, basal area and stem volume in forest stands using airborne laser scanning. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2004, 19 (6): 543- 553. doi: 10.1080/02827580410019472
	Holmgren J, Nilsson M, Olsson H. Estimation of tree height and stem volume on plots using airborne laser scanning. Forest Science, 2003, 49 (3): 419- 428. doi: 10.1093/forestscience/49.3.419
	Hyyppä J, Yu X W, Hyyppä H, et al. Advances in forest inventory using airborne laser scanning. Remote Sensing, 2012, 4 (5): 1190- 1207. doi: 10.3390/rs4051190
	MacLean G A, Krabill W B. Gross-merchantable timber volume estimation using an airborne LiDAR system. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 1986, 12 (1): 7- 18. doi: 10.1080/07038992.1986.10855092
	Næsset E. Estimating timber volume of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1997, 61 (2): 246- 253. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00041-2
	Penner M, Pitt D, Woods M. Parametric vs. nonparametric LiDAR models for operational forest inventory in boreal Ontario. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 2013, 39 (5): 426- 443.
	White J C, Coops N C, Wulder M A, et al. Remote sensing technologies for enhancing forest inventories: a review. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 2016, 42 (5): 619- 641. doi: 10.1080/07038992.2016.1207484
	Zhang Z N, Wang T J, Skidmore A K, et al. An improved area-based approach for estimating plot-level tree DBH from airborne LiDAR data. Forest Ecosystems, 2023, 10 (1): 100089.
	Zörner J, Dymond J R, Shepherd J D, et al. LiDAR-based regional inventory of tall trees: Wellington, New Zealand. Forests, 2018, 9 (11): 702. doi: 10.3390/f9110702
	Zou W T, Zeng W S, Sun X N. Simultaneous models for the estimation of main forest parameters based on airborne LiDAR data. Forests, 2024, 15 (5): 775. doi: 10.3390/f15050775

特征数 Statistics	平均胸径 Mean diameter at breast height (D)/cm	平均高 Mean height (H)/m	优势高 Dominant height (H_d)/m	株数 Stem number (N)/ (tree·hm^?2)	断面积 Basal area (G)/(m²·hm^?2)	蓄积量 Stock volume (V)/(m³·hm^?2)	生物量 Biomass (B)/(t·hm^?2)	碳储量 Carbon storage (C)/ (t·hm^?2)
平均数Mean	14.0	8.8	10.3	771	10.8	59.0	68.8	33.2
最小值Min.	5.0	1.9	2.0	15	0.1	0.1	0.1	0.1
最大值Max.	44.8	27.4	28.1	4110	43.9	435.4	338.6	163.7
标准差Standard deviation （SD）	6.1	3.9	4.4	598	7.8	57.5	54.9	26.5
变动系数Coefficient of variation （CV）（%）	43.6	44.2	42.4	77.6	72.8	97.4	79.7	79.7

森林类型 Forest type	林分因子 Stand factor	自检结果Self-validation results						交叉检验结果Cross-validation results
森林类型 Forest type	林分因子 Stand factor	R²	SEE	TRE	ASE	MPE	MPSE	R²	SEE	TRE	ASE	MPE	MPSE
森林 Forest	D	0.731	3.20	1.97	1.75	1.01	15.52	0.715	3.27	2.05	2.05	1.03	15.88
	H	0.773	1.87	0.13	?0.71	0.94	15.27	0.760	1.91	0.13	?0.52	0.96	15.58
	H_d	0.766	2.14	0.08	?0.88	0.92	15.79	0.755	2.18	0.18	?0.60	0.93	15.94
	G	0.726	4.14	0.40	0.47	1.70	31.50	0.708	4.30	1.10	1.94	1.73	31.64
	N	0.536	416	3.55	3.70	2.39	38.73	0.517	430	4.48	5.11	2.42	39.38
	V	0.767	28.0	1.22	?2.43	2.10	34.28	0.752	28.9	1.61	?0.93	2.12	34.29
	B	0.703	30.4	?0.30	0.90	1.95	34.38	0.684	31.7	0.28	2.38	1.99	34.49
	C	0.701	14.7	?0.35	0.98	1.96	34.42	0.682	15.4	0.23	2.46	2.00	34.53
针叶林 Coniferous forest	D	0.683	2.15	1.06	1.33	1.74	13.35	0.662	2.22	1.00	1.35	1.80	13.81
	H	0.752	1.44	?0.31	?1.55	2.01	14.19	0.733	1.49	?0.16	?1.32	2.08	14.55
	H_d	0.723	1.84	?0.37	?1.81	2.12	15.80	0.705	1.89	?0.23	?1.58	2.18	16.10
	G	0.839	3.22	?0.98	1.05	2.79	21.42	0.832	3.29	?1.13	0.99	2.84	21.58
	N	0.538	368	2.85	4.45	3.83	31.05	0.511	379	2.83	4.81	3.95	31.83
	V	0.837	23.6	1.49	?1.43	4.06	23.59	0.829	24.1	1.32	?1.36	4.16	23.88
	B	0.806	22.4	?2.77	1.23	3.61	24.62	0.792	23.2	?3.01	1.25	3.73	25.05
	C	0.808	11.2	?2.81	1.20	3.61	24.40	0.794	11.6	?3.05	1.22	3.74	24.82
阔叶林 Broadleaved forest	D	0.727	3.41	2.17	1.85	1.17	16.07	0.712	3.49	2.28	2.23	1.19	16.41
	H	0.762	1.96	0.21	?0.50	1.06	15.55	0.748	2.01	0.18	?0.32	1.07	15.84
	H_d	0.761	2.21	0.17	?0.64	1.01	15.79	0.749	2.24	0.26	?0.35	1.02	15.90
	G	0.696	4.34	0.78	0.33	2.03	34.07	0.676	4.52	1.71	2.18	2.05	34.21
	N	0.524	427	3.79	3.50	2.92	40.69	0.508	442	5.02	5.18	2.94	41.31
	V	0.749	29.0	1.16	?2.68	2.42	37.01	0.732	30.0	1.68	?0.82	2.44	36.95
	B	0.680	32.1	0.26	0.82	2.25	36.87	0.659	33.5	1.01	2.67	2.27	36.91
	C	0.677	15.5	0.24	0.92	2.27	36.98	0.656	16.2	0.99	2.78	2.29	37.02

[1]	Qingcheng Fu,Erfa Qiu,Yuan Zhang,Huichao Wang,Lanhong Huang. Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Heart Rot of Ancient Ginkgo biloba Trees in Beijing [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(6): 130-140.
[2]	Kuanbiao Qiu,Xiaoting Li,Junfeng Cheng,Baoquan Jia. Dynamics of Urban Tree Canopy Patches within the 6^th Ring Road in Beijing Based on Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis (MSPA) Method [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(5): 11-20.
[3]	Zexin Guo,Zhongyue Hu,Cong Cao,Ping Liu. Stand-Level Models of Biomass and Carbon Stock for Major Forest Types in Guangdong [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(12): 37-50.
[4]	Zanqing Zeng,Hanqing Song,Junhong Gao,Miaomiao Wang,Yaoxing Wu,Lianghua Qi. Spatial and Temporal Change and Potential Prediction of Carbon Sequestrating and Energy Carbon Emissing of Forest Vegetation in Beijing [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(12): 51-60.
[5]	Zihe Liu,Guodong Jia,Ziqiang Liu,Wenping Deng. Water Source Change of Platycladus orientalis under Different Water Regimes in Beijing Mountainous Area: a Multi-timescale Study [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(3): 40-47.
[6]	Xiaoting Li,Tong Li,Kuanbiao Qiu,Shasha Jiang,Baoquan Jia. Relationship between Patterns of Urban Forest Patches and Their Cooling Effects——A Case Study of Beijing Urban Area [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(4): 32-42.
[7]	Zhiyi Zhang,Lin Xin,Erfa Qiu,Xiaoyang Xie,Xinyu Wang,Zhenkai Sun,Shasha Jiang,Jiao Zhao. Scenic Beauty Estimation in Four Seasons of the Forest Belt along the Winter Olympics Expressway [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(12): 43-56.
[8]	Shaofeng Niu,Erfa Qiu,Zhiyi Zhang,Lu Xi. Changes of Diversity Gradient of Woody Plants Populations in Urban Riparian Forests of Beijing [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(11): 198-206.
[9]	Majie, Jia Baoquan. Diversity and Structural Characteristics of Woody Plants in the Greenbelt Attached to Urban Roads in the Sixth Ring Road of Beijing [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(4): 13-21.
[10]	Jia Baoquan, Qiu Kuanbiao. Urban Tree Canopy(UTC)Dynamics and Changes of Landscape Patterns in the Second Green Belt in Beijing from 2002 to 2013 [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(2): 13-21.
[11]	Zeng Weisheng, He Dongbei, Pu Ying, Xiao Qianhui. Individual Tree Biomass and Volume Equation System with Region and Origin in Variables for Pinus massoniana in China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(2): 75-86.
[12]	Zhang Yuanchen, Su Shanyu, Liu Ping, Zhang Yuxiao, Zhang Kunpeng, Wang Jingshun. Survey of Natural Enemies in Gall of Trichagalma acutissimae (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) and Biological of Its Predominant Parasitoids [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(2): 137-142.
[13]	Xiuping Liu,Baoquan Jia. Characterization of Tree Canopy in Urban Residential Areas of Beijing [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(12): 12-20.
[14]	Weisheng Zeng,Xinyun Chen,Xueyun Yang. Biomass Modeling and Productivity Analysis of Planted Populus spp. in China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(11): 1-8.
[15]	Liu Ziqiang, Yu Xinxiao, Jia Guodong, Li Hanzhi, Lu Weiwei, Hou Guirong. Response to Precipitation in Water Sources for Platycladus orientalis in Beijing Mountain Area [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(7): 16-23.

Establishment and Application of Simultaneous Models for Estimating Major Stand Characteristics in Beijing Based on LiDAR Data

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 0

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments