Welcome to visit Scientia Silvae Sinicae,Today is

Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (3): 48-60.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20250478

• Research papers • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Biomass Allocation Trade-Offs and Traits of Temperate Forests in Northeast China on Seedling Growth

Min Deng1,Huaijiang He2,Xiangju Wu3,Xinna Zhang1,Chunyu Zhang1,Xiuhai Zhao1,*()   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Efficient Production of Forest Resources, Beijing Forestry University Beijing 100083
    2. Jilin Provincial Academy of Forestry Sciences Changchun 130013
    3. Jilin Provincial Forestry Experimental Zone State-Owned Forest Protection Center Jiaohe 132517
  • Received:2025-07-27 Revised:2026-01-15 Online:2026-03-15 Published:2026-03-12
  • Contact: Xiuhai Zhao E-mail:zhaoxh@bjfu.edu.cn

Abstract:

Objective: This study investigated the effects of seedling biomass allocation trade-offs on growth and their responses to neighborhood competition and environmental factors of temperate forests in northeast China. The correlations between biomass allocation traits and organ-level traits with seedling growth were compared. This study aims to deepen the understanding of seedling biomass allocation and provide theoretical foundations for community regulation mechanisms and dynamic patterns of temperate forests in northeast China. Method: Based on data of individual seedlings from 130 quadrats surveyed in a coniferous-broadleaved mixed forest in Jiaohe, Jilin Province, principal component analysis was used to determine the trade-offs in seedling biomass allocation. Linear mixed-effects models were employed to construct a biomass allocation trade-off model, a seedling growth model, and a comparison model for biomass allocation traits and organ-level traits, analyzing the impact of biomass allocation trade-offs as well as biomass allocation traits and organ-level traits on seedling growth. Result: 1) The biomass allocation trade-offs of temperate forest seedlings in northeast China were mainly manifested in two categories: one was the root biomass investment trade-off at the expense of leaf biomass, and the other was the stem biomass investment trade-off at the expense of both leaf and root biomass. Specifically, as soil organic matter content decreased, seedlings reduced biomass allocation to roots. As canopy openness declined, seedlings increased biomass allocation to leaves. Under the combined effects of conspecific and heterospecific competition, seedlings allocated more biomass to either roots or leaves. 2) The root biomass investment trade-off at the expense of leaf biomass promoted seedling growth, while canopy openness, soil total phosphorus content, and soil total potassium content had negative effects on seedling growth. 3) Compared with organ-level traits, biomass allocation traits were more correlated with seedling growth, but the seedling growth rate was negatively correlated with resource acquisition traits such as specific stem length, specific leaf area and specific root length. Conclusion: The trade-offs in seedling biomass allocation promote seedling growth. Compared with organ-level traits, biomass allocation traits show stronger correlations with seedling growth. These findings indicate that biomass allocation plays a crucial role in shaping plant community growth dynamics and resource acquisition strategies.

Key words: biomass allocation trade-offs, seedling growth, functional traits, temperate forests, neighbor competition

CLC Number: