欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2003, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 33-38.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20030206

• 论文及研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

应用PV技术对北方4种阔叶树抗旱性的研究

孙志虎 王庆成   

  1. 东北林业大学,哈尔滨150040
  • 收稿日期:2002-09-23 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2003-03-25 发布日期:2003-03-25

THE DROUGHT RESISTANCE OF FOUR BROAD-LEAVED SPECIES IN THE NORTH OF CHINA WITH PV TECHNIQUE

Sun Zhihu,Wang Qingcheng   

  1. Northeast Forestry University Harbin150040
  • Received:2002-09-23 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2003-03-25 Published:2003-03-25

摘要:

在温室内用盆栽法研究茶条槭(Acer ginnala)、山荆子(Malus baccata)、山桃(Prunus davidiana)和山梨(Pyrus ussuriensis)的抗旱能力。设置4种土壤水分处理(土壤相对含水量75%、61%、46%、35%)。应用压力室和PV技术测定4个树种多项水分参数,并对4树种耐旱能力进行综合评定。结果表明,在干旱胁迫条件下,山梨吸收水分能力最强;4树种均有一定的渗透调节和保持膨压能力,茶条槭、山梨、山桃能通过增加束缚水含量来实现渗透调节,但其依靠改变束缚水含量来实现渗透调节作用有限,山桃、茶条槭在土壤相对含水量降至61%时,山梨在土壤相对含水量降至46%时,由束缚水含量所引起的渗透调节作用消失;在干旱胁迫条件下,山桃、茶条槭通过改变细胞壁弹性来保持膨压,山梨、山荆子主要靠渗透调节来维持膨压。干旱胁迫能增强山桃、山荆子、茶条槭保持最大膨压的能力,而降低山梨维持最大膨压的能力;茶条槭能通过提高原生质忍耐脱水能力来适应干旱,山荆子、山桃原生质耐脱水能力对干旱胁迫的适应性差,在干旱胁迫条件下其耐脱水能力减弱。通过对4树种渗透调节和维持膨压能力进行综合比较,4树种抗旱能力由强至弱依次为山荆子、山梨、山桃和茶条槭。

关键词: 水分胁迫, 渗透调节, 保持膨压, 抗旱性, 阔叶树种

Abstract:

The ability of drought resistance of Acer ginnala,Malus baccata,Prunus davidiana and Pyrus ussuriensis was studied under four soil moisture treatments (relative soil moisture content 75%、61%、46%、35%, respectively) by planting seedling in pots in greenhouse. The water parameters were calculated by using Pressure-Volume technique,and the drought resistance of four species was comprehensively evaluated. The results showed, under drought conditions, P. ussuriensis was the best in terms of water absorbing;all of four species had some extent of osmotic adjustment and turgor maintenance abilities. A. ginnala, P. ussuriensis, and P. davidiana could adjust osmosis by improving the proportion of bound water to some extent, when the soil moisture content decreased to 61% (for P. davidiana,and A. ginnala) and 46%(for P. ussuriensis), their osmotic adjustment ability by improving the proportion of bound water disappeared. Under drought conditions, P. davidiana and A. ginnala could maintain turgor by improving elasticity of cell wall, while P. ussuriensis and M. baccata maintained turgor mainly by osmotic adjustment. Water stress could increase the abilities of maintaining maximum turgor of P. davidiana, M. baccata and A. ginnala, but decrease the abilities of maintaining maximum turgor of P. ussuriensis. A. ginnala could adapt drought stress by improving the ability of tolerating dehydration, but M. baccata and P. davidiana could not. We concluded that the ability of drought resistance of four species was M. baccata>P. ussuriensis>P. davidiana>A. ginnala by integrating their osmotic potential adjustment and turgor maintaining abilities.

Key words: Water stress, Osmotic adjustment, Turgor maintaining, Drought resistance, Broad-leaved tree species