东北沙地7种植物高温时段的生理适应对策

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20140610

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

测定我国东北松嫩沙地和呼伦贝尔沙地自然生境中不同科属7种沙生植物高温时段叶抗氧化酶活力、渗透调节物和丙二醛（MDA）含量的日变化。结果表明：1） 7种沙生植物所测定指标的日均最高和最低值，叶丙二醛含量相差2~3倍；超氧化物歧化酶（SOD）、过氧化物酶（POD）、过氧化氢酶（CAT）活力分别相差2.2，7.5，2.5倍；脯氨酸、可溶性蛋白质、可溶性糖含量分别相差35，1.0，2.0倍。2）猪毛菜和差不嘎蒿日均MDA含量较低，日均SOD，POD，CAT 活力和脯氨酸、可溶性蛋白质和糖含量也较低；扁蓿豆和小叶锦鸡儿日均MDA含量较高，日均POD和CAT活力、脯氨酸、可溶性蛋白含量也较高；叶细胞膜脂过氧化程度与抗氧化酶活力和渗透调节含量正相关。3）在渗透调节物种类上，豆科植物依靠脯氨酸，黄柳和冰草依靠可溶性糖；在抗氧化酶种类上，扁蓿豆、小叶锦鸡儿和冰草依靠POD和CAT，胡枝子和黄柳依靠SOD。可见，东北沙地7种植物通过维持高抗氧化酶活力和渗透调节物含量抑制膜脂过氧化以适应风沙环境。

关键词: 沙生植物, 生理调节, 抗氧化酶, 渗透调节

Abstract:

In this study, the daily changes of antioxidant enzyme activities,the contents of malondialdehyde (MDA) and osmoregulation substances were measured in leaves of Salix gordejevii, Artemisia halodendron, Melissitus ruthenicus, Salsola collina, Agropyron cristatum, Caragana microphylla, and Lespedeza bicolor in different family and genera grown respectively in natural habitats of Hulunbuir desert and Songnen desert. The results showed 1) Among 7 species of psammophytes, the maximum value of average daily MDA content was higher 2-3 times than the minimum one; the maximum value of average daily activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT) was respectively higher 2.2, 7.5 and 2.5 times than the minimum one; the maximum value of average daily contents of proline, soluble protein and soluble sugar was respectively 35 times, 1 times and 2 times than the minimum one. 2) S. collina and A. halodendron had not only lower average daily content of MDA, but also lower average daily activities of SOD, POD, and CAT, and lower average daily contents of proline, soluble protein and soluble sugar. While, M. ruthenicus and C. microphylla had higher average daily content of MDA and activities of POD and CAT, and higher average daily contents of proline, soluble protein, indicating that the degree of membrane lipid peroxidation was positively correlated with antioxidant enzyme activity and osmoregulation substance contents. 3) In terms of kinds of osmotic adjustment substances, leguminous plants depended on proline, while S. gordejevii and A. cristatum depended on soluble sugar. In terms of kinds of antioxidant enzymes, M. ruthenicus, C. microphylla and A. cristatum hinged on CAT and POD; while, S. gordejevii and L. bicolor required for SOD. This study suggests that 7 species of psammophytes would keep higher activities of antioxidant enzymes and contents of osmotic adjustment substances to inhibit lipid peroxidation and maintain cell oxygen free radical metabolism balance to adapt to desert environment.

Key words: psammophytes, strategy of physiological regulation, activities of antioxidant enzyme, osmoregulation substance

中图分类号:

S718.43

周瑞莲, 解卫海, 侯玉平, 王艳芳, 黄清荣. 东北沙地7种植物高温时段的生理适应对策[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(6): 74-81.

Zhou Ruilian, Xie Weihai, Hou Yuping, Wang Yanfang, Huang Qingrong. Analysis on the Differences in the Strategy of Physiological Regulation among Psammophytes with Different Family and Genera in Natural Habit of Desert[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(6): 74-81.

参考文献

崔秀萍. 2008. 浑善达克沙地黄柳生理生态适应性研究. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学博士学位论文.
(Cui X P. 2008. Physio-ecological adaptability of Salix gordejeviiin hunshandak sandland. Hollot: PhD thesis of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University. [in Chinese] )
高松,苏培玺,严巧娣,等. 2009. C4荒漠植物猪毛菜与木本猪毛菜的叶片解剖结构及光合生理特征. 植物生态学报,33 (2): 347-354.
(Gao S, Su P X, Yan Q D, et al. 2009. Leaf anatomical structure and photosynthetic physiological characteristics of C4 desert species Salsola collina and S. arbuscula. Journal Of Plant Ecology(Chinese Version), 33 (2): 347-354. [in Chinese] )
高天明,闫志坚, 高丽. 2008. 四种沙漠植物的抗旱研究. 中国农业科技导报, 10(2): 105-109.
(Gao T M, Yan Z J, Gao L. 2008. Studies on drought resistance of four plants grown in desert. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 10(2): 105-109. [in Chinese] )
石凤翎,郭晓霞,李红. 2005. 扁蓿豆抗旱形态解剖结构观察与分析. 干旱地区农业研究,23(2): 115-118.
(Shi F L, Guo X X, Li H. 2005. Examination and analysis of drought-resisting morphology and anatomy of Melilotoides ruthenica. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 23(2): 115-118. [in Chinese] )
王邦锡,黄久常,王辉. 1989. 不同植物在水分胁迫条件下脯氨酸的积累与抗旱性的关系. 植物生理学报,15(1): 46-51.
(Wang B X, Huang J C, Wang H. 1989. The correlation of proline accumulation and drought resistance in various plants under water stress condition. Plant Physiology Journal, 15(1): 46-51. [in Chinese] )
张志良,瞿伟菁. 2003. 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 高等教育出版社.
张治安,张美善,蔚荣海. 2004. 植物生理学实验指导. 北京:中国农业科学技术出版社.
赵哈林. 2012. 沙漠生态学. 北京:科学出版社.
周海燕,李胜功,李新荣,等. 2004. 科尔沁沙地两种沙生植物冷蒿和差不嘎蒿竞争策略的生理生态学依据. 植物学报, 46(3):284-293.
(Zhou H Y, Li S G, Li X R, et al. 2004. Ecophysiological evidence for the competition strategy of two psammophytes Artemisia halodendron and A.frigida in Horqin Sandy Land, Nei Mongol. Acta Botanica Sinica, 46(3):284-293. [in Chinese] )
周瑞莲, 王海鸥. 1999. 在干旱高温胁迫中沙生植物抗脱水性与膜脂过氧化关系的研究. 中国沙漠, 19 (supp1): 59-64.
(Zhou R L, Wang H O. 1999. Correlation between resistance to dehydration and lipid peroxidation of desert plants under atmosphere dehydration and high temperature stresses. Journal of Desert Research, 19 (supp1): 59-64. [in Chinese] )
朱志梅,杨持. 2004. 沙漠化过程中四个共有种的生长和抗氧化系统酶类变化. 应用生态学报,15(12): 2261-2266.
(Zhu Z M, Yang C. 2004. Changes of four common plant populations growth and their anti-oxidative enzymatic system in desertification process. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 15(12): 2261-2266. [in Chinese] )
Blokhina O, Virolainen E, Fagerstedt K V. 2003. Antioxidants, oxidative damage and oxygen deprivation stress: a Review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 91: 179-194.
Bor M, Ozdemit F, Turkan I. 2003. The effect of salt stress on lipid perioxidation and antioxidants in leaves of sugar beet Beta vulgaris L. and wild beet Beta maritima L. Plant Sci, 164:77-84.
Cavalcanti F R, Oliveira J T A, Martins-Miranda A S. 2004. Superoxide dismutase, catalase and peroxidase activities do not confer protection against oxidative damage in salt-stressed cowpea leaves. New Phytol, 163(3):563-571.
Delauney A J, Verma D P S, Krupa Z. 1993. Proline biosynthesis and osmoregulation in plants. Plant J, 4(2): 215-223.
Drazkiewicz M, Skórzyńska-Polit E, Krupa Z, et al. 2004. Copper-induced oxidative stress and antioxidant defence in Arabidopsis thaliana. BioMetals, 17(4): 379-387.
Lascano H R, Antonicelli G E, Luna C M, et al. 2001. Antioxidant system response of different wheat cultivars under drought:field and in vitro studies.Ause J Agric Res, 28(11):1095-1102.
Luna C M, Garcia-Seffino L, Arias C, et al. 2000. Oxidative stress indicators as selection tools for salt tolerance in Chloris gayana. Plang Breed, 119(4):341-345.
Luo Y Y,Zhao X Y,Zhou R L, et al. 2011. Physiological acclimation of two psammophytes to repeated soil drought and rewatering.Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 33: 79-91.
Mishra R K,Singhal G S. 1992. Function of photosynthesis apparatus of intact wheat leaves under high light and heat stress and its relationship with peroxidation of thylakoid lipids. Plant Physiol, 98:1-6.
Neill S O, Gould K S. 2003. Anthocyanins in leaves: Light attenuators or antioxidants Funct. Plant Biol, 30(8): 865-873.
Queiroz C G S, Alonso A, Mares G M, et al. 1998.Chilling-induced changes in membrance fluidity and antioxidant enyzyme activities in Coffea arabica L. roots. Bio Plant, 41(3):403-413.
Sairam R K,Srivastava G C, Saxena D C. 2000.Increased antioxidant activity under elevated temperatures: A mechanism of heat stress tolerance in wheat genotypes. Biol Plant,43(2):245-251.
Sairam R K, Veerabhadra R K,Srivastava G C, et al. 2002. Differential response of wheat genotypes to long term salinity stress in relation to oxidative stress, antioxidant acivity and osmolyte concentration. Plant Sci, 163(5):1037-1064.
Smirnoff N. 1993. The role of active oxygen in the response of plants to water deficit and desiccation. New Phytol, 125:27-58.
Sundar D, Perianayaguy B, Reddy A. 2004. Localization of antioxidant enzymes in the cellular compartments of sorghum leaves. Plant Growth Regulation, 44(2): 157-163.
Voznesenshaya E V, Gamaley Y V. 1986. The ultrastructural characteristics of leaf types with Kranz anatomy. Botanicheskii Zhurnal, 71: 1291-1307.
Zhang J, Kirkham M B. 1994. Drought-stress-induced changes in activites of superoxide dismutase, catalase and peroxidase in wheat species. Plant Cell Physoil, 35(5): 785-791.
Zhang J, Cui S, Li J, et al.Protoplasmic factors, antioxidant reponses, and chilling resistance in maize.Plant Physiol Bioche,33: 567-575.
Zhu J H, Dong C H H, Zhu J K. 2007. Interplay between cold-responsive gene regulation, metabolism and RNA processing during plant cold acclimation. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 10(3): 290-295.
Zhu J K. 2002. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plant.Ann Rev Plant Bol, 53:247-273.

[1]	于姣妲, 夏丽丹, 殷丹阳, 周垂帆. 磷素对杉木幼苗耐铝性的影响机制[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(5): 36-47.
[2]	许时星, 郜海燕, 陈杭君, 韩强. 振动胁迫对蓝莓果实品质和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(9): 26-34.
[3]	张鹏, 赵彤彤, 李明月, 吴灵东, 沈海龙. 氯化钙、ABA和蔗糖预处理对解除休眠水曲柳种子低温脱水萌发的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(7): 54-61.
[4]	曹瑞致, 张馨宇, 杨大伟, 夏广东, 董娟娥. 剥皮对杜仲次生代谢物含量及伤害修复能力的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(6): 151-158.
[5]	张鹏, 宋博洋, 吴灵东, 沈海龙. 解除休眠的水曲柳种子对不同脱水条件的萌发和生理响应[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(3): 60-67.
[6]	俞飞, 宋琦, 刘美华, 董莲春, 伊力塔. 模拟酸雨不同处理对秃瓣杜英幼苗生物量和生理的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(5): 92-100.
[7]	王艳芳, 潘凤兵, 张先富, 王鹏, 陈学森, 沈向, 毛志泉. 土壤中不同酚酸类物质对平邑甜茶幼苗光合及生理特性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(2): 52-59.
[8]	赵云龙, 陈训, 李朝婵. 糙叶杜鹃扦插生根过程中生理生化分析[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(6): 45-51.
[9]	周芙蓉, 王进鑫, 杨楠, 张青, 邹朋. 干旱和铅交互作用对侧柏幼苗生长及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(6): 172-177.
[10]	胡景江;张林森;刘建朝. 干旱及外源低聚壳聚糖对1年生苹果幼树渗透调节能力的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(9): 15-21.
[11]	崔凯;张建国;李昆;廖声熙;孙永玉. 山合欢种子超干燥贮藏的生理生化效应[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(3): 17-24.
[12]	徐华潮;骆有庆;张琴. 松材线虫自然侵染对黑松、马尾松针叶含水量、色素及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(11): 140-143.
[13]	魏晓雪;于景华;李德文;佟璐;庞海河;祖元刚. UV-B辐射增强对红松幼苗针叶脂质过氧化及抗氧化系统的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(5): 54-59.
[14]	徐洁;白坤栋;万贤崇;程国华;张存义;张兆欣. 欧美杨107杨抗硫无性系的变异及其抗氧化保护系统对SO₂响应[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(2): 66-71.
[15]	谢利娟;张华;崔士超. 月季切花品种间失水胁迫耐性与抗氧化酶和内肽酶之间的关联[J]. 林业科学, 2010, 46(7): 84-91.