不同种源油蒿形态与生理特征对干旱胁迫的响应

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20150205

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】了解干旱胁迫对不同种源油蒿的形态和生理特征的影响,同时比较不同种源油蒿的抗旱能力,为我国干旱、半干旱地区引种提供理论依据。【方法】以毛乌素沙地、库布齐沙漠、草原荒漠过渡带的3个种源油蒿为材料,进行不同水分处理,研究在适宜、轻度干旱、重度干旱情况下不同种源油蒿株高、基径、叶面积、比叶面积、叶绿素a(Chla)、叶绿素b(Chlb)、叶绿素(a+b) 、类胡萝卜素(Car)、叶绿素a/b(Chla/b)、类胡萝卜素/叶绿素(Car/Chl)、可溶性糖、淀粉、非结构性碳水化合物(NSC)的变化。【结果】 3个种源地油蒿形态特征、光合色素含量以及NSC对干旱胁迫响应趋势一致,表现为随着干旱胁迫加剧:1) 油蒿的株高、基径、叶面积和比叶面积呈现逐渐减小趋势,其中在重度干旱情况下,库布齐沙漠油蒿的株高、叶面积、基径大于毛乌素沙地和草原荒漠过渡带油蒿,而比叶面积小于毛乌素沙地和草原荒漠过渡带油蒿; 2) 油蒿叶片的Chla,Chlb,Chl(a+b),Car, Chla/b和Car/Chl呈现先增大后减小的趋势,其中在重度干旱情况下,库布齐沙漠油蒿叶片的Chla,Chlb,Chl(a+b) 大于毛乌素沙地和草原荒漠过渡带油蒿叶片,而3个种源地油蒿的Car含量以及Car/Chl相差不大,Chla/b表现为草原荒漠过渡带最大,毛乌素沙地其次,库布齐沙漠最小; 3)油蒿叶片可溶性糖、淀粉和NSC含量呈现先减小后增大的趋势,其中在重度干旱情况下,草原荒漠过渡带油蒿叶片的可溶性糖、淀粉和NSC含量均大于库布齐沙漠和毛乌素沙地油蒿叶片,而库布齐沙漠油蒿叶片的可溶性糖、淀粉和NSC含量又大于毛乌素沙地油蒿叶片; 在轻度干旱情况下,库布齐沙漠油蒿叶片的可溶性糖、淀粉和NSC含量大于草原荒漠过渡带和毛乌素沙地油蒿叶片。【结论】从3个种源地油蒿株高、基径、叶面积、比叶面积、Chla、Chlb、Chl(a+b)、Car、Chla/b、Car/Chl、可溶性糖、淀粉、NSC等指标比较中,推测来自库布齐沙漠的油蒿较毛乌素沙地、草原和荒漠过渡带油蒿具有更强的抗旱性。

关键词: 油蒿, 种源, 水分胁迫, 形态, 生理, 响应

Abstract:

【Objective】In this study, we investigated effects of drought stress on morphology and physiology characteristics of Artemisia ordosica and compare with the drought-resistant ability of three different provenances of A. ordosica, to provide a theoretical basis for the introduction of the species to China's arid and semi-arid area.【Method】Three different provenances of A. ordosica were collected from Mu Us Sandy land, Kubuqi desert, and Desert-steppe transitional zone, and subjected to different soil moisture to investigate the changes of plant height, stem size, leaf area, Sla, content of Chla, Chlb, Chl(a+b) and Car, Chla/b and Car/Chl and content of starch, soluble sugars and NSC.【Result】The response of morphology characteristics, photosynthetic pigment content, and contents of starch, soluble sugars and NSC of three different provenances of A. ordosica to drought stress was consistent. Namely, as the drought stress increased, 1)plant height, stem diameter, leaf area and SLA, showed a trend of gradual decrease. The plant height, stem size, and leaf area of A. ordosica from Kubuqi desert were greater than those from Mu Us Sandy land and Desert-steppe transitional zone under the severe drought stress. However Sla of the provenance from Kubuqi desert was less than that from Mu Us Sandy land and Desert-steppe transitional zone.2)Chla,Chlb,Chl(a+b),and Car contents、Chla/b and Car/Chl of A. ordosica leaves showed a trend of first increase and then decrease under drought stress. Contents of Chla,Chlb,Chl(a+b) of A. ordosica leaves from Kubuqi desert were higher than A. ordosica from Mu Us Sandy land and Desert-steppe transitional zone under the severe drought stress. However there were no significant differences in contents of Car and Car/Chl of the three different provenances. The Chla/b of A. ordosica from Desert-steppe transitional zone was greatest, followed by that from Mu Us Sandy land, and then by that from Kubuqi desert.3)Contents of starch, soluble sugars and NSC of three different provenances leaves showed a trend of first decrease and then increase. Contents of starch, soluble sugars and NSC of A. ordosica from Desert-steppe transitional zone were higher than A. ordosica from Kubuqi desert and Mu Us Sandy land under severe drought stress, and contents of starch, soluble sugars and NSC of A. ordosica from Kubuqi desert were higher than those of A. ordosica from Mu Us Sandy land. Contents of starch, soluble sugars and NSC of A. ordosica from Kubuqi desert were higher than those of A. ordosica from Mu Us Sandy land and Desert-steppe transitional zone under slight drought stress.【Conclusion】Through the comparison of morphology and physiology characteristics of three different provenances of A. ordosica, we find that the drought resistance of A. ordosica from Kubuqi desert is stronger than A. ordosica from Mu Us Sandy land and Desert-steppe transitional zone.

Key words: Artemisia ordosica, provenances, drought stress, morphology, physiology, response

中图分类号:

S718.43

王林龙, 李清河, 徐军, 薛海霞, 江泽平. 不同种源油蒿形态与生理特征对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(2): 37-43.

Wang Linlong, Li Qinghe, Xu Jun, Xue Haixia, Jiang Zeping. Morphology and Physiology Characteristic Responses of Different Provenances of Artemisia ordosica to Drought Stress[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(2): 37-43.

参考文献

陈建勋, 王晓峰. 2006. 植物生理学实验指导.2版.广州: 华南理工大学出版社.
(Chen J X, Wang X F. 2006. Experiment guidance of plant physiology(second edition).Guangzhou:South China University of Technology Press.)
井大炜, 邢尚军, 马海林, 等. 2014. I-107欧美杨对不同强度干旱胁迫的形态与生理响应.东北林业大学学报, 42 (1): 10-13.
(Jing D W, Xing S J, Ma H L, et al.2014. Morphological and physiological responses of Populus × euramericana cv. 'Neva ' to water stress. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 42(1):10-13.)
李芳兰, 包维楷, 吴宁. 2009. 白刺花幼苗对不同强度干旱胁迫的形态和生理响应.生态学报, 29 (10): 5406-5415.
(Li F L, Bao W K, Wu N. 2009. Morphological and physiological responses of current Sophora davidii seedlings to drought stress.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29(10):5406-5415.)
刘家琼, 曾泗弟.1988.我国沙漠中部地区主要不同生态类型植物脯氨酸的累积、光合、呼吸和叶绿素含量.植物学报, 30 (1): 85-93.
(Liu J Q, Zeng S D.1988. Comparative studies on relationships between proline accumulation and photosynthesis, respiration and chlorophyll content of some plant species in the middle part of the desert zone in china.Acta Botanica Sinica, 30(1):85-93.)
潘昕, 邱权, 李吉跃, 等. 2014. 干旱胁迫对青藏高原6种植物生理指标的影响.生态学报, 34 (13): 3558-3567.
(Pan X, Qiu Q, Li J Y, et al.2014. Physiological indexes of six plant species from the Tibetan Plateau under drought stress. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34(13):3558-3567.)
孙景宽, 李田, 夏江宝, 等. 2011. 干旱胁迫对沙枣幼苗根茎叶生长及光合色素的影响.水土保持通报, 31 (1): 68-71.
(Sun J K, Li T, Xia J B, et al.2011. Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic pigment and on root, stem and leaf growth characteristics of Elaeagnus angustifolia seedlings. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 31(1):68-71.)
谢小玉, 马仲炼, 白鹏, 等. 2014. 辣椒开花结果期对干旱胁迫的形态与生理响应.生态学报, 34 (13): 3797-3805.
(Xie X Y, Ma Z L, Bai P, et al.2014. The morphological and physiological responses of hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) to drought stress with different intensity during blossom and fruit period. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34(13):3797-3805.)
肖春旺, 周广胜, 赵景柱. 2001. 不同水分条件对毛乌素沙地油蒿幼苗生长和形态的影响.生态学报, 21 (12): 2136-2140.
(Xiao C W, Zhou G S, Zhao J Z.2001. Effect of different water conditions on growth and morphology of Artemisia ordosica Krasch.seedlings in Maowusu sandland. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 21(12):2136-2140.)
张其德, 卢从明, 刘丽娜, 等. 1997. CO₂倍增对不同基因型大豆光合色素含量和荧光诱导动力学参数的影响.植物学报, 39 (10): 946-950.
(Zhang Q D, Lu C M, Liu L N, et al.1997.Effects of doubled CO₂on contents of photosynthetic and on kinetic parameters of fluorescence induction in different genotypes of soybean. Acta Botanica Sinica, 39(10): 946-950.)
郑云普, 王贺新, 娄鑫, 等. 2014. 木本植物非结构性碳水化合物变化及其影响因子研究进展.应用生态学报, 25 (4): 1188-1196.
(Zheng Y P, Wang H X, Lou X, et al. 2014. Changes of non-structural carbohydrates and its impact factors in trees: a review. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 25(4):1188-1196.)
Anjum S A, Xie X, Wang L C, et al. 2011. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(9): 2026- 2032.
Bradford K J, Hsiao T C. 1982. Physiological responses to moderate water stress. Physiological Plant Ecology II, 12/B: 263- 324.
Chaves M M, Pereira J S, Maroco J, et al.2002. How plants cope with water stress in the field.Photosynthesis and growth. Annals of Botany, 89(7): 907 - 916.
Demirevska K, Zasheva D, Dimitrov R, et al. 2009. Drought stress effects on Rubisco in wheat: changes in the Rubisco large subunit. Acta Physiol. Plant, 31(6): 1129 -1138.
Demmig-adams B. 1990.Carotenoids and photoprotection in plants: a role for the xanthophylls zeaxanthin. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1020(1): 1- 24.
Dutton H J. 1997. Carotenoid-sensitized photosynthesis:quantum efficiency, fluorescence and energy transfer. Photosynthesis Research, 52(2): 175- 185.
Guerfel M, Baccouri O, Boujnah D, et al. 2009. Impacts of water stress on gas exchange, water relations, chlorophyll content and leaf structure in the two main Tunisian olive (Oleaeuropaea L.) cultivars. Sci Horticult, 119(3): 257- 263.
Hsiao T C, Acevedo E, Fereres E, et al. 1976. Water stress, growth, and osmotic adjustment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences, 273(927): 479- 500.
Li C, Berninger F, Koskela J, et al. 2000. Drought response of Eucalyptus microtheca provenances depend on seasonality of rainfall in their place of origin.Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 27(3): 231- 238.
Liu F, Stützel H. 2004. Biomass partitioning, specific leaf area, and water use efficiency of vegetable amaranth(Amaranthus spp.) in response to drought stress. Scientia Horticulturae, 102(1): 15- 27.
Maes W H, Achten W M J, Reubens B, et al. 2009. Plant-water relationships and growth strategies of Jatropha curcas L. seedlings under different levels of drought stress.Journal of Arid Environments, 73(10): 877- 884.
Manivannan P, Jaleel C A, Kishorekumar A, et al. 2007a. Changes in antioxidant metabolism of Vigna unguiculata L. Walp. by propiconazole under water deficit stress. Colloids Surf B: Biointerf, 57(1): 69- 74.
Manivannan P, Jaleel C A, Sankar B, et al. 2007b. Growth, biochemical modifications and proline metabolism in Helianthus annuus L. as induced by drought stress. Colloids Surf B: Biointerf, 59(2): 141- 149.
McDonald A J S, Stadenberg I. 1993. Diurnal pattern of leaf extension in Salix viminalis relates to difference in leaf turgors before and after stress relaxation. Tree Physiol, 13(3): 311- 318.
Rucker K S, Kvien C K, Holbrook C C, et al. 1995. Identification of peanut genotypes with improved drought avoidance traits. Peanut Sci, 22(1): 14- 18.
Shao H B, Chu L Y, Jaleel C A, et al. 2009. Understanding water deficit stress-induced changes in the basic metabolism of higher plants-biotechnologically and sustainably improving agriculture and the ecoenvironment in arid regions of the globe. Crit Rev Biotechnol, 29(2): 131 - 151.
Siefernann-Harms D. 1985. Carotenoids in photosynthesis.I.Location in photosynthetic membranes and light-harvesting function.Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 811(4): 325- 355.
Siefernann-Harms D. 1987. The light-harvesting and protective function of the carotenoids in photosynthetic membranes.Physiologia Plantarum, 69(3): 561- 568.
Verslues P E, Agarwal M, Katiyar-Agarwal S, et al. 2006. Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. The Plant Journal, 45(4): 523-539.
Wassmann R, Jagadish S V K, Heuer S, et al. 2009. Climate change affecting rice production: the physiological and agronomic basis for possible adaptation strategies. Advances in Agronomy, 101: 59-122.
Walther G R, Post E, Convey P, et al. 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature, 416(6879): 389 - 395.
Wu F Z, Bao W K, Li F L, et al. 2008. Effects of drought stress and N supply on the growth, biomass partitioning and water-use efficiency of Sophora davidii seedlings.Environmental and Experimental Botany, 63(1): 248 - 255.
Wu Y, Cosgrove D J. 2000. Adaptation of roots to low water potentials by changes in cell wall extensibility and cell wall proteins. Journal of Experimental Botany, 51(350): 1543- 1553.
Young A J. 1991. The photoprotective role of carotenoids in higher plants.Physiologia Plantarum, 83(4): 702- 708.
Zhang J, Kirkham M B. 1996. Antioxidant responses to drought in sunflower and sorghum seedlings. New Phytologist, 132(3): 361-373.
Zhang X, Zang R, Li C. 2004. Population differences in physiological and morphological adaptations of Populus davidiana seedlings in response to progressive drought stress. Plant science, 166(3): 791- 797.

[1]	赵志江, 郭文霞, 康东伟, 崔莉, 赵联军, 李俊清. 川西亚高山岷江冷杉和紫果云杉径向生长对气候因子的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(7): 1-16.
[2]	王艺, 贾忠奎, 马履一, 邓世鑫, 朱仲龙, 桑子阳. 4种植物生长调节剂对红花玉兰嫩枝扦插生根的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(7): 35-45.
[3]	李丹, 张俊杰, 赵梦溪. 基于FCM和分水岭算法的无人机影像中林分因子提取[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(5): 180-187.
[4]	申静霞, 袁秀锦, 李迈和, 于飞海, 王雪, 刘录, 贺云龙, 雷静品. 土壤温度和水分变化对川西云杉幼苗氮和磷含量的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(4): 31-41.
[5]	王怡霖, 王卫锋, 张芸香, 常淑君, 郭晋平. 碧玉杨叶形态结构与生理特性对干旱的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(4): 42-50.
[6]	官纪元, 樊卫国. 不同磷水平下刺梨实生苗生长及根系形态特征与内源激素含量的关系[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(4): 51-61.
[7]	蔡小娜, 苏筱雨, 黄大庄, 沈佐锐. 基于几何形态测量学的天蛾科成虫数字化分类[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(1): 38-46.
[8]	曹丹丹, 魏建荣, 王伟超, 王丽平, 赵正萍, 刘曙雯, 嵇保中. 松材线虫病死木皮下的南京隐翅虫(鞘翅目:隐翅虫科)[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(1): 157-162.
[9]	秦媛, 潘雪玉, 靳微, 陈连庆, 袁志林. 杨树人工林土壤微生物群落4种提取方法比较[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(9): 169-176.
[10]	姚虹宇, 刘亚敏, 张盛楠, 刘玉民, 周文颖, 王针针. 外源柠檬酸对铝胁迫下马尾松生理特性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(7): 155-164.
[11]	李艳梅, 陈奇伯, 王邵军, 孙应都, 杨淏舟, 杨思莹. 昆明市主要绿化树种叶片滞尘能力的叶表微形态学解释[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(5): 18-29.
[12]	李永亮, 张怀清, 杨廷栋, 马载阳, 贺长平, 李思佳. 模糊逻辑与复合顺序形态学相结合的叶脉检测方法[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(5): 70-77.
[13]	成敏敏, 陈柯伊, 朱雪玉, 王凯利, 周明兵, 杨海芸. 花叶矢竹复绿期光合特性及叶绿体结构[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(4): 1-10.
[14]	王哲, 王喜明. 活立木生理干燥过程中水分传输和散失机制探讨[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(3): 123-133.
[15]	吴鞠, 陈瑜, 刘海轩, 许丽娟, 金桂香, 徐程扬. 林分密度及混交度对长白山天然风景林树木形态的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(12): 12-21.