林业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (6): 27-35.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20250771
收稿日期:2025-12-24
修回日期:2026-03-20
出版日期:2026-06-10
发布日期:2026-06-13
通讯作者:
崔丽娟
E-mail:wetlands108@126.com
基金资助:
Huajing Li1,2,3,Jing Li1,2,3,Lijuan Cui1,*(
)
Received:2025-12-24
Revised:2026-03-20
Online:2026-06-10
Published:2026-06-13
Contact:
Lijuan Cui
E-mail:wetlands108@126.com
摘要:
目的: 探究冬季低温胁迫下不同湿地植被类型土壤活性微生物群落的动态变化规律,以期阐明低温条件下湿地生态系统关键生态功能(纤维素降解)维持的微生物学机制。方法: 分别在冬、春季节期间的2021年11月(低温胁迫前)、2022年1月(低温胁迫期间)和2022年3月(低温胁迫缓解后)采集香蒲和鸢尾的土壤样品,提取RNA进行高通量测序,同时采用3,5-二硝基水杨酸(DNS)比色法测定纤维素酶活性,通过计算活性微生物群落对低温胁迫的抵抗力和恢复力,运用双因素方差分析、回归分析、网络分析、热图分析和随机森林模型,揭示温度和植被类型对活性微生物群落、纤维素酶活性的影响并鉴定对酶活性影响最大的微生物类群。结果: 1)温度极显著影响土壤活性微生物群落丰富度(P < 0.001),不同的优势微生物类群表现出不同的响应策略。变形菌门、拟杆菌门对低温胁迫表现出高抵抗力,而酸杆菌门、放线菌门、蓝藻门、厚壁菌门、硝化螺旋菌门和浮霉菌门对低温胁迫表现出低抵抗力。2)香蒲和鸢尾的土壤微生物群落丰富度无显著差异,但鸢尾的土壤活性微生物对低温胁迫的抵抗力和恢复力更高,其微生物共现网络也更复杂。3)土壤纤维素酶活性受土壤温度极显著影响(P < 0.01),但在不同植被类型间无显著差异。随机森林模型分析显示,酸杆菌门是影响纤维素酶活性最重要的微生物类群。结论: 低温胁迫是影响活性微生物群落的关键因子,植被可通过增强微生物群落的稳定性和种间互作,提高活性微生物对低温胁迫的适应能力,合理配置植被有利于在低温条件下维持湿地生态系统功能。
中图分类号:
李华靖,李晶,崔丽娟. 北方湿地土壤活性微生物对低温胁迫的响应机制[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(6): 27-35.
Huajing Li,Jing Li,Lijuan Cui. Response Mechanisms of Soil Active Microorganisms in Northern Wetlands to Low-Temperature Stress[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2026, 62(6): 27-35.
| 崔丽娟, 张曼胤, 张 岩, 等. 湿地恢复研究现状及前瞻. 世界林业研究, 2011, 24 (2): 5- 9. | |
| Cui L J, Zhang M Y, Zhang Y, et al. Status and outlook of wetland restoration research. World Forestry Research, 2011, 24 (2): 5- 9. | |
|
贺纪正, 李 晶, 郑袁明. 土壤生态系统微生物多样性−稳定性关系的思考. 生物多样性, 2013, 21 (4): 412- 421.
doi: 10.19392/j.cnki.1671-7341.201712208 |
|
|
He J Z, Li J, Zheng Y M. Thoughts on the microbial diversity-stability relationship in soil ecosystems. Biodiversity Science, 2013, 21 (4): 412- 421.
doi: 10.19392/j.cnki.1671-7341.201712208 |
|
| 黄松庆, 刘秀红, 曹馨月, 等. 城市污水处理厂A2O工艺N2O产生、关键影响因素与减排策略. 环境科学, 2025, 46 (1): 140- 147. | |
| Huang S Q, Liu X H, Cao X Y, et al. N2O generation, key influencing factors, and emission reduction strategies of A2O process in municipal wastewater treatment plant. Environmental Science, 2025, 46 (1): 140- 147. | |
| 李 晶, 刘玉荣, 贺纪正, 等. 土壤微生物对环境胁迫的响应机制. 环境科学学报, 2013, 33 (4): 959- 967. | |
| Li J, Liu Y R, He J Z, et al. Insights into the responses of soil microbial community to the environmental disturbances. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2013, 33 (4): 959- 967. | |
|
李 鑫, 李娅芸, 安韶山, 等. 宁南山区典型草本植物茎叶分解对土壤酶活性及微生物多样性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27 (10): 3182- 3188.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201610.016 |
|
|
Li X, Li Y Y, An S S, et al. Effects of stem and leaf decomposition in typical herbs on soil enzyme activity and microbial diversity in the south Ningxia loess hilly region of Northwest China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27 (10): 3182- 3188.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201610.016 |
|
|
申建波, 白 洋, 韦 中, 等. 根际生命共同体: 协调资源、环境和粮食安全的学术思路与交叉创新. 土壤学报, 2021, 58 (4): 805- 813.
doi: 10.11766/trxb202012310722 |
|
|
Shen J B, Bai Y, Wei Z, et al. Rhizobiont: an interdisciplinary innovation and perspective for harmonizing resources, environment, and food security. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2021, 58 (4): 805- 813.
doi: 10.11766/trxb202012310722 |
|
|
王光华, 刘俊杰, 于镇华, 等. 土壤酸杆菌门细菌生态学研究进展. 生物技术通报, 2016, 32 (2): 14- 20.
doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2016.02.002 |
|
|
Wang G H, Liu J J, Yu Z H, et al. Research progress of acidobacteria ecology in soils. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2016, 32 (2): 14- 20.
doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2016.02.002 |
|
|
Attia S, Russel J, Mortensen M S, et al. Unexpected diversity among small-scale sample replicates of defined plant root compartments. The ISME Journal, 2022, 16 (4): 997- 1003.
doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01094-7 |
|
|
Bhat N A, Riar A, Ramesh A, et al. Soil biological activity contributing to phosphorus availability in vertisols under long-term organic and conventional agricultural management. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8, 1523.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01523 |
|
|
Chen J H, Wu Q F, Li S H, et al. Diversity and function of soil bacterial communities in response to long-term intensive management in a subtropical bamboo forest. Geoderma, 2019, 354, 113894.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113894 |
|
|
Colombo F, MacDonald C A, Jeffries T C, et al. Impact of forest management practices on soil bacterial diversity and consequences for soil processes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2016, 94, 200- 210.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.11.029 |
|
|
Cui J, Zhao J, Wang Z, et al. Diversity of active root-associated methanotrophs of three emergent plants in a eutrophic wetland in northern China. AMB Express, 2020, 10 (1): 48.
doi: 10.1186/s13568-020-00984-x |
|
|
Delgado-Baquerizo M, Oliverio A M, Brewer T E, et al. A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil. Science, 2018, 359 (6373): 320- 325.
doi: 10.1126/science.aap9516 |
|
|
Edgar R C, Haas B J, Clemente J C, et al. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of Chimera detection. Bioinformatics, 2011, 27 (16): 2194- 2200.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 |
|
|
Feng J W, Cui B H, Yuan B X, et al. Purification mechanism of low-pollution water in three submerged plants and analysis of bacterial community structure in plant rhizospheres. Environmental Engineering Science, 2020, 37 (8): 560- 571.
doi: 10.1089/ees.2019.0459 |
|
|
Fierer N. Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2017, 15 (10): 579- 590.
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.87 |
|
|
Frank J A, Reich C I, Sharma S, et al. Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2008, 74 (8): 2461- 2470.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.02272-07 |
|
|
Gao C, Xu L, Montoya L, et al. Co-occurrence networks reveal more complexity than community composition in resistance and resilience of microbial communities. Nature Communications, 2022, 13, 3867.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31343-y |
|
| Gratz R, Brumbarova T, Ivanov R, et al. Phospho-mutant activity assays provide evidence for alternative phospho-regulation pathways of the transcription factor fer-like iron deficiency-induced transcription factor. The New Phytologist, 2020, 225 (1): 250- 267. | |
|
Guo X, Zhu L, Zhong H, et al. Response of antibiotic and heavy metal resistance genes to tetracyclines and copper in substrate-free hydroponic microcosms with Myriophyllum aquaticum. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 413, 125444.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125444 |
|
|
He S, Ding L L, Xu K, et al. Effect of low temperature on highly unsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis in activated sludge. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 211, 494- 501.
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.069 |
|
|
Hernandez D J, David A S, Menges E S, et al. Environmental stress destabilizes microbial networks. The ISME Journal, 2021, 15 (6): 1722- 1734.
doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-00882-x |
|
|
Huang L B, Bai J H, Wen X J, et al. Microbial resistance and resilience in response to environmental changes under the higher intensity of human activities than global average level. Global Change Biology, 2020, 26 (4): 2377- 2389.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.14995 |
|
|
Ji M D, Hu Z, Hou C L, et al. New insights for enhancing the performance of constructed wetlands at low temperatures. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 301, 122722.
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122722 |
|
|
Kajihara K T, Hynson N A. Networks as tools for defining emergent properties of microbiomes and their stability. Microbiome, 2024, 12 (1): 184.
doi: 10.1186/s40168-024-01868-z |
|
|
Kanokratana P, Uengwetwanit T, Rattanachomsri U, et al. Insights into the phylogeny and metabolic potential of a primary tropical peat swamp forest microbial community by metagenomic analysis. Microbial Ecology, 2011, 61 (3): 518- 528.
doi: 10.1007/s00248-010-9766-7 |
|
|
Kouba V, Vejmelkova D, Zwolsman E, et al. Adaptation of anammox bacteria to low temperature via gradual acclimation and cold shocks: Distinctions in protein expression, membrane composition and activities. Water Research, 2022, 209, 117822.
doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117822 |
|
|
Liu C C, Yu D S, Wang Y Y, et al. A novel control strategy for the partial nitrification and anammox process (PN/A) of immobilized particles: Using salinity as a factor. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 302, 122864.
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122864 |
|
|
Liu X, Wang M, Liu B, et al. Keystone taxa mediate the trade-off between microbial community stability and performance in activated sludges. Nature Water, 2025, 3, 723- 733.
doi: 10.1038/s44221-025-00451-6 |
|
|
Louca S, Jacques S M S, Pires A P F, et al. High taxonomic variability despite stable functional structure across microbial communities. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2017, 1, 15.
doi: 10.3410/f.728777529.793570413 |
|
|
Maisch M, Lueder U, Kappler A, et al. Iron lung: how rice roots induce iron redox changes in the rhizosphere and create niches for microaerophilic Fe(II)-oxidizing bacteria. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2019, 6 (10): 600- 605.
doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00403 |
|
|
Manasa S L, Panigrahy M, Panigrahi K C S, et al. Overview of cold stress regulation in plants. The Botanical Review, 2022, 88 (3): 359- 387.
doi: 10.1007/s12229-021-09267-x |
|
|
McAteer P G, Christine Trego A, Thorn C, et al. Reactor configuration influences microbial community structure during high-rate, low-temperature anaerobic treatment of dairy wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 307, 123221.
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123221 |
|
|
Orwin K H, Wardle D A. New indices for quantifying the resistance and resilience of soil biota to exogenous disturbances. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2004, 36 (11): 1907- 1912.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.04.036 |
|
|
Pankratov T A, Ivanova A O, Dedysh S N, et al. Bacterial populations and environmental factors controlling cellulose degradation in an acidic Sphagnum peat. Environmental Microbiology, 2011, 13 (7): 1800- 1814.
doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02491.x |
|
|
Personnic N, Striednig B, Hilbi H. Quorum sensing controls persistence, resuscitation, and virulence of Legionella subpopulations in biofilms. The ISME Journal, 2021, 15 (1): 196- 210.
doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-00774-0 |
|
|
Pimm S L. The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature, 1984, 307 (5949): 321- 326.
doi: 10.1038/307321a0 |
|
|
Sandra M, Fredrik D, Erland B. Antagonistic and synergistic effects of fungal and bacterial growth in soil after adding different carbon and nitrogen sources. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2008, 40 (9): 2334- 2343.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.011 |
|
|
Schnecker J, Wild B, Takriti M, et al. Microbial community composition shapes enzyme patterns in topsoil and subsoil horizons along a latitudinal transect in Western Siberia. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2015, 83, 106- 115.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.01.016 |
|
|
Shen C, Su L T, Zhao Y Q, et al. Plants boost pyrrhotite-driven nitrogen removal in constructed wetlands. Bioresource Technology, 2023, 367, 128240.
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128240 |
|
|
Stephen J R, McCaig A E, Smith Z, et al. Molecular diversity of soil and marine 16S rRNA gene sequences related to beta-subgroup ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1996, 62 (11): 4147- 4154.
doi: 10.1128/aem.62.11.4147-4154.1996 |
|
|
Tang S Y, Liao Y H, Xu Y C, et al. Microbial coupling mechanisms of nitrogen removal in constructed wetlands: a review. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 314, 123759.
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123759 |
|
|
Wang M X, Chen X L, Liu X N, et al. Even allocation of benefits stabilizes microbial community engaged in metabolic division of labor. Cell Reports, 2022, 40 (13): 111410.
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111410 |
|
|
Wang Y, Thompson K N, Yan Y, et al. RNA-based amplicon sequencing is ineffective in measuring metabolic activity in environmental microbial communities. Microbiome, 2023, 11 (1): 131.
doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01449-y |
|
|
Wilhelm R C, Singh R, Eltis L D, et al. Bacterial contributions to delignification and lignocellulose degradation in forest soils with metagenomic and quantitative stable isotope probing. The ISME Journal, 2019, 13 (2): 413- 429.
doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0279-6 |
|
|
Xiong C, Zhu Y G, Wang J T, et al. Host selection shapes crop microbiome assembly and network complexity. New Phytologist, 2021, 229 (2): 1091- 1104.
doi: 10.1111/nph.16890 |
|
|
Xu L, Shi Y J, Fang H Y, et al. Vegetation carbon stocks driven by canopy density and forest age in subtropical forest ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 631, 619- 626.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.080 |
|
|
Zhang A L, Yin J F, Zhang Y M, et al. Plants alter their aboveground and belowground biomass allocation and affect community-level resistance in response to snow cover change in Central Asia, Northwest China. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 902, 166059.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166059 |
|
|
Zhu Y N, Cui L J, Li J, et al. Long-term performance of nutrient removal in an integrated constructed wetland. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 779, 146268.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146268 |
| [1] | 朱俊英,肖辉杰. 干旱半干旱区稀疏植被多维全过程防风机理研究进展和挑战[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(5): 200-212. |
| [2] | 朱长轩,张金,李威,张玉珊,冯泳翰,蒋涛,贾国栋,余新晓. 坝上地区典型树种防护林带冬春季防风固沙效能[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(3): 25-35. |
| [3] | 郑群芳,庞建壮,张祎帆,吴小云,张勤,许行,许杨,张志强. “三北”工程区植被水分利用效率的时空变化特征[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(2): 75-84. |
| [4] | 于涛,何亮,杨文斌,程一本,冯伟,齐容镰,刘国华,宁岩岩,于远远,李卫. 科尔沁沙地典型乔灌植被的深层渗漏与土壤水分补给特征[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(1): 83-94. |
| [5] | 于晓燕,高雅娴,魏光普,张舒宇,张文君. 内蒙古自治区植被恢复力时空格局及其对极端气候的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(9): 48-58. |
| [6] | 袁泽雨,许行,任怡,许杨,庞建壮,吴小云,张翰遥,张志强. 2001—2021年“三北”工程区植被韧性分布特征及其驱动因素[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(7): 182-191. |
| [7] | 张城伟,王兴,安可,吴子昊,张静宜,钟泽坤. 黄土丘陵区退耕植被叶片-土壤生态化学计量特征与植物内稳态差异[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(6): 61-74. |
| [8] | 张君瑶,李晨亮,刘慧,段春明,曾海聪,王嘉楠. 合肥市城市绿色廊道中传粉昆虫多样性及其影响因素[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(6): 147-158. |
| [9] | 崔妞妞,庞建壮,张祎帆,许行,张勤,张志强. 海河典型流域气候变化和植被恢复对水文的影响——以张家口清水河流域为例[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(3): 38-49. |
| [10] | 黄云,徐黎亮,郑博福,宋旭,胡方清,朱锦奇,万炜. 亚热带典型森林生产力及碳利用率的气候变化响应[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(3): 121-134. |
| [11] | 魏光普,张文君,朱治衡,高雅娴,于晓燕. 基于kNDVI的内蒙古自治区2004—2023年植被覆盖度时空变化及气候驱动因子[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(11): 80-91. |
| [12] | 杨柳,闫峰,王艳姣. 科尔沁和浑善达克沙地植被覆盖度时空变化及驱动力[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(11): 70-79. |
| [13] | 刘鲁霞,胡波,桑国庆,刘玉玉. 激光雷达森林结构指标在森林植物多样性评估中的研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(1): 176-196. |
| [14] | 张雨田,石军南,张怀清,吴炳伦. 洞庭湖湿地植被时空动态及其驱动力分析[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(8): 1-13. |
| [15] | 李琪,孙睿,柏佳,张静宇,张赫林. 聚集指数和最大羧化速率对基于遥感产品的植被生产力估算的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(6): 25-36. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||