林业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (2): 75-84.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20240823
• 研究论文 • 上一篇
郑群芳1,2,庞建壮1,2,张祎帆1,2,吴小云1,2,张勤1,2,许行1,2,*(
),许杨1,2,张志强1,2
收稿日期:2024-12-31
修回日期:2025-05-16
出版日期:2026-02-25
发布日期:2026-03-04
通讯作者:
许行
E-mail:hangxu@bjfu.edu.cn
基金资助:
Qunfang Zheng1,2,Jianzhuang Pang1,2,Yifan Zhang1,2,Xiaoyun Wu1,2,Qin Zhang1,2,Hang Xu1,2,*(
),Yang Xu1,2,Zhiqiang Zhang1,2
Received:2024-12-31
Revised:2025-05-16
Online:2026-02-25
Published:2026-03-04
Contact:
Hang Xu
E-mail:hangxu@bjfu.edu.cn
摘要:
目的: 探究“三北”工程区植被水分利用效率(WUE)的时空变化特征及其对环境因素和干旱事件的响应,为区域生态系统的可持续管理和干旱应对策略提供科学依据。方法: 基于2001—2022年植被总初级生产力(GPP)和蒸散(ET)数据,结合气象观测数据,在500 m分辨率上计算逐像元的WUE(WUE=GPP/ET),分析研究区WUE和标准化降水蒸散指数(SPEI-12,指各年份1月至12月的累积干旱程度)的时空变化特征。通过偏相关分析,探讨WUE与主要环境因素(气温、降水)和干旱之间的关系,并进一步分析不同植被类型WUE对干旱强度的响应。结果: 1) 2001—2022年,“三北”工程区年平均WUE为(1.12±0.35)g·kg?1。从空间分布来看,西北荒漠大部分地区(新疆南部除外)、黄土高原丘陵沟壑区和东北华北平原农区中部的WUE显著上升;新疆南部、风沙区和东北华北平原农区北部的WUE显著下降(P < 0.05)。2) “三北”工程区植被WUE对降水和气温的响应存在显著空间差异,西北荒漠区、黄土高原丘陵沟壑区和风沙区大部分区域以及东北华北平原农区中部的WUE主要受降水变化的影响;新疆准噶尔盆地和塔里木盆地周边、黄土高原丘陵沟壑区中部、浑善达克和呼伦贝尔沙地以及东北华北平原农区南部的WUE主要受气温变化的影响。3) 湿润地区植被WUE随干旱加剧而增加,干旱地区则相反。不同植被类型WUE对干旱的响应也表现出明显差异,森林和草地WUE在轻度和中度干旱条件下显著增加,在重度和极端干旱条件下显著下降,且草地敏感性较低,灌木WUE在轻度干旱条件下显著增加,在中度和重度干旱条件下显著下降。结论: “三北”工程区植被WUE呈自东向西逐渐降低的空间分布特征。在湿润地区,植被WUE随干旱加剧而增加;不同植被类型WUE对环境变化和干旱的响应策略存在显著差异,草地对干旱尤为敏感。有必要根据不同区域特点的自然条件与植被特征,因地制宜地制定精准管理策略。
中图分类号:
郑群芳,庞建壮,张祎帆,吴小云,张勤,许行,许杨,张志强. “三北”工程区植被水分利用效率的时空变化特征[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(2): 75-84.
Qunfang Zheng,Jianzhuang Pang,Yifan Zhang,Xiaoyun Wu,Qin Zhang,Hang Xu,Yang Xu,Zhiqiang Zhang. Spatiotemporal Variation Characteristics of Vegetation Water Use Efficiency in the Three-North Shelterbelt Forest Program Region[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2026, 62(2): 75-84.
图1
2001—2022年“三北”工程区水分利用效率和标准化降水蒸散指数的时间变化趋势 图中呈现“三北”工程区区域尺度上每年水分利用效率和标准化降水蒸散指数变化趋势,数据反映区域整体情况。无色表示非干旱(SPEI-12>?0.5),浅灰色表示轻度干旱(−1.0<SPEI-12≤−0.5),深灰色表示中度干旱(−1.5<SPEI-12≤−1.0)。The figure presents the annual change trend of water use efficiency (WUE) and the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI-12) at the regional scale of the Three-North Shelterbelt Forest Program Region. The data reflect the overall situation of the region. Colorless indicates non drought (SPEI-12>?0.5), light gray represents the mild drought level (−1.0<SPEI-12≤−0.5) and dark gray indicates moderate drought (−1.5<SPEI-12≤−1.0)."
图3
2001—2022年“三北”工程区水分利用效率与气温、降水的偏相关关系 图中r为气温、降水与水分利用效率的偏相关系数,该系数通过逐年计算得出In the figure, r represents the partial correlation coefficient among temperature, precipitation, and water use efficiency, and this coefficient is calculated year by year. TNR表示“三北”工程区Three-North Shelterbelt Forest Program Region;Ⅰ表示东北华北平原农区Northeast and north China plain agricultural region;Ⅱ表示风沙区 Aeolan sand area;Ⅲ表示黄土高原丘陵沟壑区Hilly and gully region of the Loess Plateau;Ⅳ表示西北荒漠区Northwestern desert region."
| 常 娟, 张增信, 田佳西, 等. 西北地区草地水分利用效率时空特征及其对气候变化的响应. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44 (3): 119- 125. | |
| Chang J, Zhang Z X, Tian J X, et al. Spatio-temporal characteristics of grassland water use efficiency and its response to climate change in northwest China. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2020, 44 (3): 119- 125. | |
| 陈国龙, 杨瑞霞, 王 普, 等. 近20 a三北地区植被资源时空变化特征探究. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43 (5): 1028- 1037. | |
| Chen G L, Yang R X, Wang P, et al. Spatial and temporal variation characteristics of vegetation resourcesin Three North Regions in recent 20 years. Journal of Yunnan University: Natural Sciences Edition, 2021, 43 (5): 1028- 1037. | |
| 杜晓铮, 赵 祥, 王昊宇, 等. 陆地生态系统水分利用效率对气候变化的响应研究进展. 生态学报, 2018, 38 (23): 8296- 8305. | |
| Du X Z, Zhao X, Wang H Y, et al. Responses of terrestrial ecosystem water use efficiency to climate change: a review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38 (23): 8296- 8305. | |
| 郭 铌, 王小平. 遥感干旱应用技术进展及面临的技术问题与发展机遇. 干旱气象, 2015, 33 (1): 1−18. | |
| Guo N, Wang X P. Advances and developing opportunities in remote sensing of drought. Journal of Arid Meteorology, 2015, 33 (1): 1−18. | |
| 郝海超, 郝兴明, 花 顶, 等. 2000—2018年中亚五国水分利用效率对气候变化的响应. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44 (1): 1- 14. | |
| Hao H C, Hao X M, Hua D, et al. Response of water use efficiency to climate change in five central Asian countries from 2000 to 2018. Arid Land Geography, 2021, 44 (1): 1- 14. | |
| 黄 麟, 祝 萍, 肖 桐, 等. 近35年三北防护林体系建设工程的防风固沙效应. 地理科学, 2018, 38 (4): 600- 609. | |
| Huang L, Zhu P, Xiao T, et al. The sand fixation effects of Three-North Shelter Forest Program in recent 35 years. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38 (4): 600- 609. | |
| 纪 平, 邵全琴, 王 敏, 等. 中国三北防护林工程第二阶段生态效益综合评价. 林业科学, 2022, 58 (11): 31- 48. | |
| Ji P, Shao Q Q, Wang M, et al. Monitoring and assessment of ecological benefits of the Shelter Forest Program in the Three-North Region during 2001—2020. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58 (11): 31- 48. | |
| 刘 珂, 姜大膀. 基于两种潜在蒸散发算法的SPEI对中国干湿变化的分析. 大气科学, 2015, 39 (1): 23- 36. | |
| Liu K, Jiang D B. Analysis of dryness/wetness over China using standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index based on two evapotranspiration algorithms. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 2015, 39 (1): 23- 36. | |
| 刘 雨, 高光耀, 李宗善, 等. 内蒙古荒漠草原植物水分利用特征差异及对环境因子的响应. 生态学报, 2023, 43 (19): 7924- 7935. | |
| Liu Y, Gao G Y, Li Z S, et al. Differences in plant water use characteristics and responses to environmental factors in the desert grassland of the Inner Mongolia. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43 (19): 7924- 7935. | |
| 刘原峰, 朱国锋, 赵 军, 等. 黄土高原区不同降水相态的时空变化. 地理科学, 2016, 36 (8): 1227- 1233. | |
| Liu Y F, Zhu G F, Zhao J, et al. Spatial and temporal variation of different precipitation type in the Loess Plateau Area. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016, 36 (8): 1227- 1233. | |
| 石欣荣, 佘敦先, 夏 军, 等. 1960-2019年三北地区潜在蒸散发的变化及归因. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2022, 55 (10): 973- 984. | |
| Shi X R, She D X, Xia J, et al. Variation and attribution of potential evapotranspiration in the Three-Northern Regions, China during 1960−2019. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2022, 55 (10): 973- 984. | |
| 薛联青, 肖 颖, 刘远洪, 等. 黄河流域植被水分利用效率对干旱的时空累积响应. 水资源保护, 2023, 39 (4): 32- 41. | |
| Xue L Q, Xiao Y, Liu Y H, et al. Spatiotemporal accumulation response of vegetation water use efficiency to drought in the Yellow River Basin. Water Resources Protection, 2023, 39 (4): 32- 41. | |
| 杨思遥, 孟 丹, 李小娟, 等. 华北地区2001—2014年植被变化对SPEI气象干旱指数多尺度的响应. 生态学报, 2018, 38 (3): 1028- 1039. | |
| Yang S Y, Meng D, Li X J, et al. Multi-scale responses of vegetation changes relative to the SPEI meteorological drought index in North China in 2001—2014. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38 (3): 1028- 1039. | |
| 张宝庆, 邵 蕊, 赵西宁, 等. 大规模植被恢复对黄土高原生态水文过程的影响. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2020, 28 (3): 594- 606. | |
| Zhang B Q, Shao R, Zhao X N, et al. Effects of large-scale vegetation restoration on eco-hydrological processes over the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2020, 28 (3): 594- 606. | |
| 张含玉, 方怒放, 史志华. 黄土高原植被覆盖时空变化及其对气候因子的响应. 生态学报, 2016, 36 (13): 3960- 3968. | |
| Zhang H Y, Fang N F, Shi Z H. Spatio-temporal patterns for the NDVI and its responses to climatic factors in the Loess Plateau, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36 (13): 3960- 3968. | |
| 张辉辉, 师尚礼, 武 蓓, 等. 苜蓿与3种多年生禾草混播效应研究. 草业学报, 2022, 31 (2): 159- 170. | |
| Zhang H H, Shi S L, Wu B, et al. A study of yield interactions in mixed sowings of alfalfa and three perennial grasses. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31 (2): 159- 170. | |
| 朱教君, 郑 晓. 关于三北防护林体系建设的思考与展望: 基于40年建设综合评估结果. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38 (5): 1600- 1610. | |
| Zhu J J, Zheng X. The prospects of development of the Three-North Afforestation Program (TNAP) : on the basis of the results of the 40-year construction general assessment of the TNAP. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2019, 38 (5): 1600- 1610. | |
|
Deng C L, Zhang B Q, Cheng L Y, et al. Vegetation dynamics and their effects on surface water-energy balance over the Three-North Region of China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2019, 275, 79- 90.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.05.012 |
|
|
Fang L D, Ning Q R, Guo J J, et al. Hydraulic limitation underlies the dieback of Populus pseudo-simonii trees in water-limited areas of northern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, 483, 118764.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118764 |
|
| Feng L, Teng F, Li N, et al. A reference-grade genome of the xerophyte Ammopiptanthus mongolicus sheds light on its evolution history in legumes and drought-tolerance mechanisms. Plant Communications, 2024, 5 (7): 100891. | |
|
Guo L M, Shan N, Zhang Y G, et al. Separating the effects of climate change and human activity on water use efficiency over the Beijing-Tianjin Sand Source Region of China. Science of The Total Environment, 2019, 690, 584- 595.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.067 |
|
| Hao Y B, Zhang H, Biederman J A, et al. 2018. Seasonal timing regulates extreme drought impacts on CO2 and H2O exchanges over semiarid steppes in Inner Mongolia, China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 266: 153-166. | |
|
Hoover D L, Hajek O L, Smith M D, et al. Compound hydroclimatic extremes in a semi-arid grassland: drought, deluge, and the carbon cycle. Global Change Biology, 2022, 28 (8): 2611- 2621.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.16081 |
|
|
Hu Y G, Li H, Wu D, et al. LAI-indicated vegetation dynamic in ecologically fragile region: a case study in the Three-North Shelter Forest program region of China. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 120, 106932.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106932 |
|
| Hu Z Y, Dai Q H, Li H Y, et al. 2024. Response of ecosystem water-use efficiency to global vegetation greening. Catena, 239: 107952. | |
|
Hisano M, Ghazoul J, Chen X L, et al.. Functional diversity enhances dryland forest productivity under long-term climate change. Science Advances, 2024, 10 (17): eadn4152.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159546 |
|
|
Liu Y B, Xiao J F, Ju W M, et al. Water use efficiency of China’s terrestrial ecosystems and responses to drought. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5 (1): 13799.
doi: 10.1038/srep13799 |
|
|
Ma R X, Cui X M, Wang D C, et al. Spatial and temporal characteristics of water use efficiency in typical ecosystems on the Loess Plateau in the last 20 years, with drivers and implications for ecological restoration. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14 (22): 5632.
doi: 10.3390/rs14225632 |
|
|
Seleiman M F, Al-Suhaibani N, Ali N, et al. Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects. Plants, 2021, 10 (2): 259.
doi: 10.3390/plants10020259 |
|
|
Song B, Niu S L, Wan S Q. Precipitation regulates plant gas exchange and its long-term response to climate change in a temperate grassland. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2016, 9 (5): 531- 541.
doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtw010 |
|
|
Su J X, Fan L X, Yuan Z L, et al. Quantifying the drought sensitivity of grassland under different climate zones in northwest China. Science of The Total Environment, 2024a, 910, 168688.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168688 |
|
|
Su M L, Yan K, Wang X F, et al. Contrasting responses of water use efficiency to increasing aridity in alpine shrubs: a modelling perspective. Journal of Hydrology, 2024b, 639, 131595.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131595 |
|
|
Xi B Y, Di N, Cao Z G, et al. Characteristics and underlying mechanisms of plant deep soil water uptake and utilization: implication for the cultivation of plantation trees. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2018, 42 (9): 885- 905.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2018.0083 |
|
|
Xu H J, Wang X P, Zhao C Y, et al. Diverse responses of vegetation growth to meteorological drought across climate zones and land biomes in northern China from 1981 to 2014. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2018, 262, 1- 13.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.06.027 |
|
|
Xu H J, Wang X P, Zhao C Y, et al. Responses of ecosystem water use efficiency to meteorological drought under different biomes and drought magnitudes in northern China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2019, 278, 107660.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107660 |
|
|
Xu X J, Jiao F S, Gong H B, et al. Observed divergence in the trends of temperature controls on Chinese ecosystem water use efficiency. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 157, 111241.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111241 |
|
|
Yang L S, Feng Q, Lu T X, et al. The response of agroecosystem water use efficiency to cropland change in northwest China’s Hexi Corridor. Agricultural Water Management, 2023, 276, 108062.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108062 |
|
|
Yin Y H, Deng H Y, Ma D Y. Complex effects of moisture conditions and temperature enhanced vegetation growth in the arid/humid transition zone in northern China. Science of The Total Environment, 2022, 805, 150152.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150152 |
|
|
Yu Z, Wang J X, Liu S R, et al. Global gross primary productivity and water use efficiency changes under drought stress. Environmental Research Letters, 2017, 12 (1): 014016.
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa5258 |
|
|
Yuan X L, Bai J, Li L H, et al. The dominant role of climate change in determining changes in evapotranspiration in Xinjiang, China from 2001 to 2012. PLoS One, 2017, 12 (8): e0183071.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183071 |
|
|
Zhang L, Deng C Y, Kang R, et al. Assessing the responses of ecosystem patterns, structures and functions to drought under climate change in the Yellow River Basin, China. Science of The Total Environment, 2024a, 929, 172603.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172603 |
|
|
Zhang Q, Kong D D, Singh V P, et al. Response of vegetation to different time-scales drought across China: Spatiotemporal patterns, causes and implications. Global and Planetary Change, 2017, 152, 1- 11.
doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.02.008 |
|
|
Zhang T, Quan W J, Tian J Y, et al. Spatial and temporal variations of ecosystem water use efficiency and its response to soil moisture drought in a water-limited watershed of northern China. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024b, 355, 120251.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120251 |
|
|
Zheng L, Lu J Z, Chen X L. Drought offsets the vegetation greenness-induced gross primary productivity from 1982 to 2018 in China. Journal of Hydrology, 2024, 632, 130881.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130881 |
| [1] | 梁璇,王力. 毛乌素沙地地下水埋深驱动樟子松水分利用趋深适应与效率提升[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(2): 53-65. |
| [2] | 康敏敏,李平平,万艳芳,段文标,于澎涛,王彦辉,张小全,李未来,高原. 北京山区侧柏人工林液流密度对极端土壤干旱的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(9): 59-69. |
| [3] | 杨智慧,韦柳端,于淼,董天心,张星宇,张新娜,马冰倩,徐程扬. 4种树苗生长的干旱胁迫响应取决于低序级根性状[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(9): 81-89. |
| [4] | 李泽义,莫惟轶,王玉婷,张慧瑶,马博龙,黄欣,姜在民,蔡靖. 持续干旱胁迫及复水下红桦幼苗水力学性状与非结构性碳的动态响应[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(9): 90-100. |
| [5] | 曾岩,冒吉荣,陈相霖,徐馨妤,梁静,刘莹. 氮添加与干旱共同作用下的油松幼苗渗透调节机制[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(8): 70-79. |
| [6] | 张城伟,王兴,安可,吴子昊,张静宜,钟泽坤. 黄土丘陵区退耕植被叶片-土壤生态化学计量特征与植物内稳态差异[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(6): 61-74. |
| [7] | 李钦渊,周泽园,李廷山,于海群,赵洪贤,刘新月,高瑶,刘鹏,查天山. 北京百花山华北落叶松天然次生林的资源利用效率生长季动态变化及影响因素[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(4): 69-80. |
| [8] | 杨世纪,万艳芳,白雨诗,王冬梅,于澎涛,王彦辉,王巍樾,陈瑜佳. 六盘山不同坡向华北落叶松林分蒸腾对环境因子的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(3): 108-120. |
| [9] | 殷晓晴,马岚,牛凤娇. 模拟干旱条件下晋西黄土区刺槐林土壤水分运移特征[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(10): 49-59. |
| [10] | 谢静,张峰,周泽圆,于海群,韩艺,杨春欣,蒋薇,刘进祖,刘博恩,刘鹤. 北京城市公园人工林生态系统水分利用效率的季节变化[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(9): 12-17. |
| [11] | 竹万宽,王志超,杜阿朋,许宇星. 广东湛江桉树人工林碳水通量季节格局及其环境生物控制[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(9): 18-32. |
| [12] | 管崇帆,高翔,李志鹏,胡晓创,胡美均,张劲松,孟平,蔡金峰,孙守家. 辽西地区樟子松人工林生产力和水分利用效率对气候变化的响应及预测[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(7): 28-39. |
| [13] | 刘元玺,王丽娜,吴俊文,李世民. 云南松幼苗生物量和非结构性碳水化合物特征的干旱响应[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(6): 71-85. |
| [14] | 韩新生,许浩,蔡进军,董立国,郭永忠,王月玲,万海霞,安钰. 宁夏黄土区稀疏带状山杏人工林土壤湿度动态与影响因素[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(4): 79-90. |
| [15] | 周凡博,刘玉民,刘亚敏,代崇雯,高琦,张钰林,朱娅婷. 外源茉莉酸甲酯对红椿苗木干旱损伤的缓解作用及生理机制[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(12): 58-71. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||