欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (5): 200-212.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20250615

• 综合评述 • 上一篇    下一篇

干旱半干旱区稀疏植被多维全过程防风机理研究进展和挑战

朱俊英,肖辉杰*()   

  1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院 北京?100083
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-12 修回日期:2026-02-10 出版日期:2026-05-10 发布日期:2026-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 肖辉杰 E-mail:herr_xiao@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家林业和草原局揭榜挂帅项目(202401–07);国家自然科学基金项目(32371961);国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFE0121800)。

Research Progress and Challenges of Multidimensional and Whole-Process Mechanisms of Wind Prevention by Sparse Vegetation in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions

Junying Zhu,Huijie Xiao*()   

  1. College of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University Beijing?100083
  • Received:2025-10-12 Revised:2026-02-10 Online:2026-05-10 Published:2026-05-12
  • Contact: Huijie Xiao E-mail:herr_xiao@hotmail.com

摘要:

荒漠化是制约全球可持续发展的重大生态环境问题,其有效防治的关键在于深入理解干旱半干旱区稀疏植被与风的相互作用机理。当前,稀疏植被防风机理研究尚未形成从静态形态特征、风致动态响应到流场调控的全过程系统性认知,难以实现多尺度互作机制的有机整合。本研究以“静态形态?动态响应?气动效应?防风机制”为主线,系统梳理稀疏植被的防风机理。在静态形态结构方面,植被防风效能主要受其孔隙度、几何形态、柔韧性及季相特征的结构性调控,最优孔隙度阈值因植被类型而异,植被几何形态结构通过改变气流路径、调节气流阻力和重新分配剪应力等机制调控流场,并通过其柔韧性优化防风功能,最终形成差异化的防风功能空间格局。在风致动态响应方面,植被主要通过摇摆和形态重构2种途径适应风场,其中植被摆动特征主要以形态结构为主导因素,固有频率和阻尼比是定量表征其动态响应的关键参数,而形态重构通过流线型效应和迎风面积减小效应实现动态减阻适应。在气动效应方面,气动效应是植被调控风场的关键环节,阻力系数是量化植被风阻效应的核心物理量,该参数可直接反映植被对气流动能的耗散能力。与刚性植被模型截然不同,柔性植被的阻力系数随风速增大呈递减趋势,同时阻力系数随孔隙度的非线性变化源于多物理过程的耦合作用。植被防风静态机制研究中,背风区气流恢复模型已由经验模型演进为机理?统计耦合模型,显著提升了预测精度和物理可解释性;防风动态机制主要包括形态重构?气动载荷调控与结构柔化?能量耗散两大路径。但现有动态机制研究多以乔木为研究对象,对干旱半干旱区广泛分布灌木的动态响应机制研究仍十分薄弱,亟待开展针对性研究以弥补研究短板。综上,稀疏植被的防风过程本质上是一个并发、多尺度和动态反馈的连续物理谱系。未来需开展“静态形态?力学特性?气动效应?流场调控?防风功能”多维耦合的系统性研究,构建适用于稀疏植被的全过程防风理论体系。研究需突破自然柔性植被流固耦合的数学表征瓶颈,深刻揭示自然植被与风的互作机理,推动多物理场耦合的理论发展,为干旱半干旱区的荒漠化防治、生态友好型防风工程优化及生态修复提供坚实的科学依据。

关键词: 荒漠化, 稀疏植被, 防风机理, 静态结构, 动态响应, 气动效应

Abstract:

Desertification is a major ecological and environmental trouble that constrains global sustainable development. Effective mitigation of desertification hinges upon a comprehensive understanding of the interactions between sparse vegetation and wind blow in arid and semi-arid regions. Current research on the windbreak mechanisms of sparse vegetation has not yet to establish a systematic framework of the entire process from static morphological traits, wind-induced dynamic responses to flow field modifications, thereby hindering the integration of multi-scale interactions. Therefore, this review takes the conceptual chain of “static morphology-dynamic response-aerodynamic effect-windbreak mechanism” as the main line, and systematically synthesizes the windbreak mechanisms of sparse vegetation. Regarding static morphological structure, the windbreak efficacy of vegetation is predominantly regulated by structural attributes such as porosity, geometry, flexibility, and phenophase characteristics. The optimal porosity threshold for wind protection varies with the vegetation type. Plant geometric architecture modulates the flow field by altering airflow pathways, regulating aerodynamic drag, and redistributing shear stress. Flexibility further optimizes windbreak function, collectively shaping the spatial heterogeneity of wind protection. In terms of wind-induced dynamic responses, vegetation adapts to wind loading primarily through two pathways: swaying and morphological reconfiguration. Swaying characteristics are predominantly governed by morphological structure, with natural frequency and damping ratio serving as key quantitative parameters for characterizing dynamic responses. Morphological reconfiguration achieves dynamic drag reduction adaptation through streamlining and a decrease in windward area. Regarding aerodynamic effects, these effects represent the pivotal link in wind flow modulation by vegetation. The drag coefficient is a core physical parameter for quantifying the wind resistance effect, directly reflecting the capacity of vegetation to dissipate airflow kinetic energy. In contrast to rigid vegetation models, the drag coefficient of flexible vegetation exhibits a decreasing trend with increasing wind speed. Furthermore, the nonlinear relationship between drag coefficient and porosity is due to the coupling effect of multiple physical processes. In studies of static windbreak mechanisms, models for flow recovery in the lee side have evolved from empirical formulations to coupled mechanistic-statistical models, significantly enhancing predictive accuracy and physical interpretability. Dynamic windbreak mechanisms primarily encompass two pathways: morphological reconfiguration coupled with aerodynamic load regulation, and structural flexibilization coupled with energy dissipation. However, existing research on dynamic mechanisms predominantly focuses on trees, whereas investigations into the dynamic responses of shrubs, which are widely distributed in arid and semi-arid regions, remain remarkably limited. Targeted studies are urgently needed to address this knowledge gap. In summary, the windbreak process of sparse vegetation fundamentally represents a concurrent, multi-scale, dynamically interactive physical continuum. In the future, it is necessary to conduct systematic research on the multidimensional coupling of “static morphology-mechanical properties-aerodynamic effects-flow field modulation-windbreak function”, aiming to construct a comprehensive theoretical framework describing the entire windbreak process for sparse vegetation. Critical challenges include overcoming the mathematical representation bottlenecks in fluid-structure interactions of natural flexible vegetation, deeply elucidating the mechanisms of vegetation-wind interactions, and advancing the theoretical development of multi-physics coupling. Addressing these challenges will provide a robust scientific foundation for desertification control, the optimization of eco-friendly windbreak engineering, and ecological restoration in arid and semi-arid regions.

Key words: desertification, sparse vegetation, windbreak mechanism, static structure, dynamic response, aerodynamic effect

中图分类号: