|
孔祥培, 张蒙悦, 丁兆军. 柳暗花明: 胞外生长素信号感受的新突破. 植物学报, 2023, 58 (6): 861- 865.
|
|
Kong X P, Zhang M Y, Ding Z J. There is a way out-new breakthroughs in extracellular auxin sensing. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2023, 58 (6): 861- 865.
|
|
舒文波, 赵树堂, 章晶晶, 等. 超量表达FBL1对84K杨根系和生长量影响研究. 林业科学研究, 2015, 28 (6): 871- 876.
|
|
Shu W B, Zhao S T, Zhang J J, et al. Overexpressing FBL1 receptor led to root formation and growth of Populus alba × P. glandulosa cl. ‘84K’. Forest Research, 2015, 28 (6): 871- 876.
|
|
徐慧芳, 陈 栩. 生长素研究现状及其在大豆育种中的应用. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2024, 54 (2): 247- 259.
doi: 10.1360/SSV-2023-0069
|
|
Xu H F, Chen X. Current opinions on auxin research and its application in soybean breeding. Scientia Sinica Vitae, 2024, 54 (2): 247- 259.
doi: 10.1360/SSV-2023-0069
|
|
余浩森, 曾智新, 乔 静, 等. PagTMK10介导生长素信号途径影响84K杨高生长和径向生长. 林业科学, 2025, 61 (9): 113- 122.
|
|
Yu H S, Zeng Z X, Qiao J, et al. PagTMK10 mediates auxin signaling pathway affecting height and radial growth of Populus alba × P. glandulosa. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61 (9): 113- 122.
|
|
张琦琦. 2024. ‘84K’杨内生菌脱菌体系及PagTMK家族部分形成层高表达基因功能研究. 武汉: 华中农业大学.
|
|
Zhang Q Q. 2024. Endophytes debacterization system and functional studyofsomecambium high-expression genesin the PagTMK family of ‘84K’. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University. [in Chinese]
|
|
左雯腾, 孟佳慧, 卢孟柱, 等. 银腺杨生长素受体基因PagFBL3对茎生长发育的影响. 林业科学, 2023, 59 (11): 59- 67.
|
|
Zuo W T, Meng J H, Lu M Z, et al. Effects of PagFBL3 gene on stem growth and development of Populus alba × P. glandulosa. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59 (11): 59- 67.
|
|
Bjorklund S, Antti H, Uddestrand I, et al. Cross-talk between gibberellin and auxin in development of Populus wood: gibberellin stimulates polar auxin transport and has a common transcriptome with auxin. The Plant Journal, 2007, 52 (3): 499- 511.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03250.x
|
|
Cao M, Chen R, Li P, et al. TMK1-mediated auxin signalling regulates differential growth of the apical hook. Nature, 2019, 568 (7751): 240- 243.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1069-7
|
|
Dharmasiri N, Dharmasiri S, Estelle M. The F-box protein TIR1 is an auxin receptor. Nature, 2005, 435 (7041): 441- 445.
doi: 10.1038/nature03543
|
|
Friml J, Gallei M, Gelová Z, et al. ABP1-TMK auxin perception for global phosphorylation and auxin canalization. Nature, 2022, 609 (7927): 575- 581.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05187-x
|
|
Kepinski S, Leyser O. The Arabidopsis F-box protein TIR1 is an auxin receptor. Nature, 2005, 435 (7041): 446- 451.
doi: 10.1038/nature03542
|
|
Kubeš M, Napier R. Non-canonical auxin signalling: fast and curious. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2019, 70 (10): 2609- 2614.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz111
|
|
Leyser O. Auxin signaling. Plant Physiology, 2018, 176 (1): 465- 479.
doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00765
|
|
Nilsson J, Karlberg A, Antti H, et al. Dissecting the molecular basis of the regulation of wood formation by auxin in hybrid aspen. The Plant Cell, 2008, 20 (4): 843- 855.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.055798
|
|
Qiu D Y, Bai S L, Ma J C, et al. The genome of Populus alba × Populus tremula var. Glandulosa clone 84K. DNA Research, 2019, 26 (5): 423- 431.
doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsz020
|
|
Robert S, Kleine-Vehn J, Barbez E, et al. ABP1 mediates auxin inhibition of clathrin-dependent endocytosis in Arabidopsis. Cell, 2010, 143 (1): 111- 121.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.027
|
|
Shu W B, Zhou H J, Jiang C, et al. The auxin receptor TIR1 homolog (PagFBL1) regulates adventitious rooting through interactions with Aux/IAA28 in Populus. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2019, 17 (2): 338- 349.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.12980
|
|
Uggla C, Moritz T, Sandberg G, et al. Auxin as a positional signal in pattern formation in plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1996, 93 (17): 9282- 9286.
|
|
Xu T D, Dai N, Chen J S, et al. Cell surface ABP1-TMK auxin-sensing complex activates ROP GTPase signaling. Science, 2014, 343 (6174): 1025- 1028.
doi: 10.1126/science.1245125
|
|
Xu T D, Wen M Z, Nagawa S, et al. Cell surface- and rho GTPase-based auxin signaling controls cellular interdigitation in Arabidopsis. Cell, 2010, 143 (1): 99- 110.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.003
|