林业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (7): 45-53.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20220014
收稿日期:
2022-01-07
出版日期:
2023-07-25
发布日期:
2023-09-08
通讯作者:
时伟宇
E-mail:1490957274@qq.com
基金资助:
Yuejin Zhang(),Qinyi Li,Haocai Wang,Weiyu Shi*
Received:
2022-01-07
Online:
2023-07-25
Published:
2023-09-08
Contact:
Weiyu Shi
E-mail:1490957274@qq.com
摘要:
目的: 探究西南喀斯特地区植被自然恢复演替过程中典型群落的土壤碳氮储量变化特征,为该地区退化生态系统恢复与重建提供参考。方法: 采用空间代时间方法,在重庆市中梁山喀斯特槽谷选取弃耕地(弃耕半年)、草地(5~10年)、灌丛(15~25?年)、灌乔林(30~40年)和乔木林(50~60年)作为一个植被自然恢复演替序列,设置固定样地,采集0~10、10~30、30~50、50~70?cm土层土壤样品,测定有机碳(SOC)、全氮(TN)、全磷(TP)、全钾(TK)、铵态氮(NH4+-N)、硝态氮(NO3?-N)含量及碳氮比(C/N)和土壤pH,估算各演替序列下土壤碳氮储量,分析在自然恢复演替不同阶段的土壤碳氮含量与储量特征。结果: 植被自然恢复演替显著提高土壤SOC和TN含量与储量(P ?<?0.001),灌乔阶段的土壤SOC和TN含量与储量最高,含量分别为57.75和6.31?g·kg ?1,储量分别为87.71和10.06?t·hm?2,相比弃耕地阶段的碳氮储量分别增长51.88%和30.31%;各演替阶段0~30?cm土层SOC储量占0~70?cm土层的64.02%~73.68%,TN储量占64.73%~78.55%;0~70?cm土层C/N在自然恢复演替过程中呈先升后降的变化趋势,在灌丛阶段最高,为9.56;0~30?cm土层C/N在乔木阶段最高,为9.98,30~70?cm土层C/N相对较低;土壤NH4+-N储量以灌乔阶段最高(0.103?t·hm?2);土壤NO3?-N储量以弃耕地阶段最高(0.076?t·hm?2),其次为灌乔阶段(0.038?t·hm?2);土壤SOC和TN储量与土壤NH4+-N、NO3?-N和TP含量显著正相关(P<?0.05),此外,土壤SOC储量与土壤TN、TK含量显著正相关(P?<?0.05),土壤TN储量与土壤SOC含量显著正相关(P<?0.05);土壤C/N与土壤SOC、TN和NH4+-N含量极显著正相关(P?<0.01),与土壤TP含量显著正相关(P<?0.05),与土壤TK含量极显著负相关(P?<?0.01)。结论: 西南喀斯特地区植被自然恢复演替可显著提高土壤碳氮含量与储量(P?<?0.001),对0~30?cm土层的碳氮含量与储量、C/N的影响比在30~70?cm土层更明显。土壤碳氮储量与土壤养分循环存在一定关联。随植被自然恢复演替到灌乔阶段,土壤碳氮储量得到显著提升并达到峰值(P?<?0.001);植被自然恢复对土壤质量提升显著(P?<?0.001)。
中图分类号:
张跃进,李沁谊,王好才,时伟宇. 中国西南喀斯特地区植被自然恢复演替典型群落土壤碳氮储量特征[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(7): 45-53.
Yuejin Zhang,Qinyi Li,Haocai Wang,Weiyu Shi. Characteristics of Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Storage in Typical Communities of Natural Restoration and Succession of Vegetation in Karst Areas of Southwest China[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(7): 45-53.
表1
?采样点基本概况①"
植被恢复阶段 Vegetation restoration?stage | 经/纬度 Longitude/ latitude | 海拔 Altitude/m | 坡度 Slope/(°) | 植被盖度 Vegetation cover | 物种丰富度 Species? richness | 恢复年限 Restoration? years/a |
弃耕地 Abandoned?land | 106°26′35.16″E 29°47′15.72″N | 588 | 2 | 0.05±0.01 | — | 0.5 |
草地 Grassland | 106°26′34.80″E 29°47′15.72″N | 588 | 5 | 0.75±0.13 | 8±2 | 5?~?10 |
灌丛 Shrub | 106°26′41.28″E 29°47′4.56″N | 563 | 19 | 0.60±0.11 | 11±3 | 15~25 |
灌乔林 Shrub-forest | 106°26′28.68″E 29°46′48.36″N | 578 | 27 | 0.70±0.23 | 21±3 | 30~40 |
乔木林 Forest | 106°26′22.92″E 29°46′42.6″N | 574 | 23 | 0.80±0.17 | 23±3 | 50~60 |
表2
?植被恢复阶段和土层深度及其交互作用对土壤碳氮含量与储量、碳氮比的影响①"
因素 Factors | 土壤有机碳 Soil?organic? carbon(SOC) | 土壤全氮 Soil?total? nitrogen(TN) | 土壤碳氮比 Soil?carbon?to?nitrogen? ratio(C/N) | 土壤有机碳储量 Soil?organic?carbon? storage(Cs) | 土壤全氮储量 Soil?total?nitrogen? storage(Ns) |
恢复阶段 Restoration?stage | 118.546*** | 2000.404*** | 13.705*** | 119.422*** | 2038.402*** |
土层深度 Soil?depth | 1199.602*** | 10786.149*** | 69.966*** | 1190.698*** | 14972.842*** |
恢复阶段×土层深度 Restoration?stage?×?soil?depth | 62.459*** | 689.225*** | 6.450*** | 62.563*** | 697.308*** |
表3
?植被不同恢复阶段土壤碳氮储量与土壤化学性质的相关关系①"
组分 Items | pH | 土壤 有机碳 Soil?organic?carbon (SOC) | 土壤 全氮 Soil?total?nitrogen (TN) | 土壤 碳氮比 Soil?carbon?to?nitrogen?ratio (C/N) | 土壤 有机碳储量 Soil?organic? carbon?storage (Cs) | 土壤 全氮储量 Soil?total???????nitrogen?storage (Ns) | 土壤 全磷 Soil?total?phosphorus (TP) | 土壤 全钾 Soil?total?potassium (TK) | 土壤 铵态氮 Soil?ammonium?nitrogen (NH4+-N) | 土壤 硝态氮 Soil?nitrate?nitrogen (NO3?-N) |
pH | 1 | |||||||||
SOC | ?0.050 | 1 | ||||||||
TN | ?0.089 | 0.981** | 1 | |||||||
C/N | ?0.133 | 0.681** | 0.569** | 1 | ||||||
Cs Ns TP TK NH4+-N | ?0.045 ?0.082 ?0.554** 0.426** ?0.212 | 1.000** 0.983** 0.504** ?0.273** 0.948** | 0.982** 1.000** 0.589** ?0.192 0.960** | 0.686** 0.576** 0.271* ?0.583** 0.630** | 1 0.980** 0.498** ?0.278* 0.947** | ??????? 1 0.582** ?0.200 0.960** | 1 ?0.128 0.623** | 1 ?0.354** | 1 | |
NO3?-N | ?2.252 | 0.535** | 0.622** | 0.134 | 0.526** | 0.611** | 0.659** | 0.041 | 0.559** | 1 |
鲍士旦. 2000. 土壤农化分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社. | |
Bao S D. 2000. Soil agricultural chemical analysis. Beijing: China Agriculture Press.[in Chinese] | |
陈 静, 朱大运, 陈 浒, 等. 石漠化区生态治理措施对土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳的影响. 长江流域资源与环境, 2021, 30 (9): 2236- 2244. | |
Chen J, Zhu D Y, Chen H, et al. Effects of ecological management measures on soil aggregate stability and organic carbon in rocky desertification areas. Resources and Environment of the Yangtze River Basin, 2021, 30 (9): 2236- 2244. | |
陈为峰, 史衍玺, 田素锋, 等. 黄河口新生湿地土壤氮磷分布特征研究. 水土保持学报, 2008, 22 (1): 69- 73.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2008.01.015 |
|
Chen W F, Shi Y X, Tian S F, et al. Distribution characteristics of soil nitrogen and phosphorus in new wetland of Yellow River Estuary. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 22 (1): 69- 73.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2008.01.015 |
|
邸月宝, 王辉民, 马泽清, 等. 亚热带森林生态系统不同重建方式下碳储量及其分配格局. 科学通报, 2012, 57 (17): 1553- 1561. | |
Di Y B, Wang H M, Ma Z Q, et al. Carbon storages and its allocation pattern of forest ecosystems with different restoration methods in subtropical. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2012, 57 (17): 1553- 1561. | |
高艳丽, 杨智杰, 张 丽, 等. 不同更新方式对亚热带常绿阔叶林土壤氮矿化的影响. 林业科学, 2021, 57 (4): 24- 31. | |
Gao Y L, Yang Z J, Zhang L, et al. Effects of different regenerated models on soil nitrogen mineralization in subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57 (4): 24- 31. | |
辜 翔, 张仕吉, 刘兆丹, 等. 中亚热带植被恢复对土壤有机碳含量、碳密度的影响. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42 (5): 595- 608.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2018.0021 |
|
Gu X, Zhang S J, Liu Z D, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration on soil organic carbon concentration and density in the midsubtropical region of China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2018, 42 (5): 595- 608.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2018.0021 |
|
何高迅, 王 越, 彭淑娴, 等. 滇中退化山地不同植被恢复下土壤碳氮磷储量与生态化学计量特征. 生态学报, 2020, 40 (13): 4425- 4435. | |
He G X, Wang Y, Peng S X, et al. Soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus storages and ecological stoichiometry characteristics under different vegetation restoration in degraded mountainous areas of central Yunnan. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40 (13): 4425- 4435. | |
胡 宁, 马志敏, 蓝家程, 等. 石漠化山地植被恢复过程土壤团聚体氮分布及与氮素矿化关系研究. 环境科学, 2015, 36 (9): 3411- 3421.
doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2015.09.037 |
|
Hu N, Ma Z M, Lan J C, et al. Distribution of soil aggregate nitrogen and its relationship with nitrogen mineralization during vegetation restoration in rocky desertification mountainous areas. Environmental Science, 2015, 36 (9): 3411- 3421.
doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2015.09.037 |
|
李智超, 张勇强, 宋立国, 等. 江西大岗山不同林龄杉木人工林土壤碳氮储量. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39 (10): 116- 122.
doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2019.10.017 |
|
Li Z C, Zhang Y Q, Song L G, et al. Soil carbon and nitrogen reserves of Chinese fir plantations of different ages in Dagangshan, Jiangxi. Journal of Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 2019, 39 (10): 116- 122.
doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2019.10.017 |
|
刘玉林, 朱广宇, 邓 蕾, 等. 黄土高原植被自然恢复和人工造林对土壤碳氮储量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29 (7): 2163- 2172.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201807.005 |
|
Liu Y L, Zhu G Y, Deng L, et al. Effects of natural vegetation restoration and artificial afforestation on soil carbon and nitrogen storages in the Loess Plateau. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29 (7): 2163- 2172.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201807.005 |
|
罗 达, 冯秋红, 史作民, 等. 岷江干旱河谷区岷江柏人工林碳氮储量随林龄的动态. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26 (4): 1099- 1105.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.20150107.001 |
|
Luo D, Feng Q H, Shi Z M, et al. The dynamics of carbon and nitrogen storages of cypress plantation in arid valley of Minjiang River with forest age. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26 (4): 1099- 1105.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.20150107.001 |
|
吕 刚, 王 婷, 李叶鑫, 等. 樟子松固沙林更新迹地草本植物多样性及其对土壤理化性质的影响. 生态学报, 2017, 37 (24): 8294- 8303. | |
Lü G, Wang T, Li Y X, et al. Diversity of herbaceous plants and their effects on soil physicochemical properties in Pinus sylvestris sand-fixing forest regeneration site . Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37 (24): 8294- 8303. | |
史利江, 高 杉, 姚晓军, 等. 晋西北黄土丘陵区不同植被恢复下的土壤碳氮累积特征. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30 (9): 1787- 1796.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.09.002 |
|
Shi L J, Gao S, Yao X J, et al. Soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation characteristics under different vegetation restoration in loess hilly areas of northwestern Shanxi. Journal of Ecological Environment, 2021, 30 (9): 1787- 1796.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.09.002 |
|
王瑞璋, 黎建强, 杨关吕, 等. 2019. 磨盘山典型森林生态系统土壤营养元素储量及其价值量评估. 西部林业科学, 48(6): 93−99. | |
Wang R Z, Li J Q, Yang G L, et al. 2019. The storages and value assessment of soil nutrient elements in typical forest ecosystems in Mt. Mopan, China. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 48(6): 93−99.[in Chinese] | |
王绍强, 于贵瑞. 生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征. 生态学报, 2008, 28 (8): 3937- 3947.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.08.054 |
|
Wang S Q, Yu G R. Ecological stoichiometric characteristics of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in ecosystem. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28 (8): 3937- 3947.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.08.054 |
|
王振鹏, 陈金磊, 李尚益, 等. 湘中丘陵区不同恢复阶段森林生态系统的碳储量特征. 林业科学, 2020, 56 (5): 19- 28.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20200503 |
|
Wang Z P, Chen J L, Li S Y, et al. Characteristics of forest ecosystem carbon stocks at different vegetation restoration stages in hilly area of central Hunan Province, China. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56 (5): 19- 28.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20200503 |
|
徐 丽, 于贵瑞, 何念鹏. 1980s—2010s中国陆地生态系统土壤碳储量的变化. 地理学报, 2018, 73 (11): 2150- 2167.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201811008 |
|
Xu L, Yu G R, He N P. Changes in soil carbon storages of terrestrial ecosystems in China from 1980s to 2010s. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73 (11): 2150- 2167.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201811008 |
|
杨 怡, 欧洋运东, 陈 浩, 等. 西南喀斯特区植被恢复对土壤氮素转化通路的影响. 环境科学, 2018, 39 (6): 2845- 2852.
doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201710066 |
|
Yang Y, Ouyang Y D, Chen H, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration on soil nitrogen transformation pathway in southwest karst area. Environmental Science, 2018, 39 (6): 2845- 2852.
doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201710066 |
|
余 健, 房 莉, 卞正富, 等. 土壤碳库构成研究进展. 生态学报, 2014, 34 (17): 4829- 4838. | |
Yu J, Fang L, Bian Z F, et al. Research progress of soil carbon pool composition. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34 (17): 4829- 4838. | |
张春华, 王宗明, 居为民, 等. 松嫩平原玉米带土壤碳氮比的时空变异特征. 环境科学, 2011, 32 (5): 1407- 1414.
doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2011.05.014 |
|
Zhang C H, Wang Z M, Ju W M, et al. The spatial and temporal variation characteristics of soil C/N ratio in maize belt of Songnen Plain. Environmental Science, 2011, 32 (5): 1407- 1414.
doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2011.05.014 |
|
张 刚, 王德建, 王 灿. 不同农田施肥方式下土壤碳氮变化特征及其环境意义. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29 (32): 303- 308.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2013.32.056 |
|
Zhang G, Wang D J, Wang C. Variation characteristics of soil carbon and nitrogen under different farmland fertilization methods and their environmental significance. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29 (32): 303- 308.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2013.32.056 |
|
张希彪, 上官周平. 人为干扰对黄土高原子午岭油松人工林土壤物理性质的影响. 生态学报, 2006, 26 (11): 3685- 3695.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2006.11.022 |
|
Zhang X B, Shangguan Z P. Effect of human-induced disturbance on physical properties of soil in artificial Pinus tabulaeformis of the Loess Plateau . Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26 (11): 3685- 3695.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2006.11.022 |
|
张 芸, 李惠通, 张 辉, 等. 不同林龄杉木人工林土壤C: N: P化学计量特征及其与土壤理化性质的关系. 生态学报, 2019, 39 (7): 2520- 2531. | |
Zhang Y, Li H T, Zhang H, et al. Soil C: N: P stoichiometry and its relationship with soil physical and chemical properties in Chinese fir plantations of different ages. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39 (7): 2520- 2531. | |
钟伶志, 李国荣, 李进芳, 等. 不同植被类型对土壤物理化学和力学性质的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46 (15): 112- 116.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2018.15.035 |
|
Zhong L Z, Li G R, Li J F, et al. Effects of different vegetation types on soil physicochemical and mechanical properties. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46 (15): 112- 116.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2018.15.035 |
|
周序力, 蔡 琼, 熊心雨, 等. 2018. 贵州月亮山不同演替阶段亮叶水青冈林碳储量及其分配格局. 植物生态学报, 42(7): 703−712. | |
Zhou X L, Cai Q, Xiong X Y, et al. 2018. Ecosystem carbon storages and within-system distribution in successional Fagus lucida forests in Mt. Yueliang, Guizhou, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 42(7): 703−712.[in Chinese] | |
朱秋莲, 邢肖毅, 张 宏, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区不同植被区土壤生态化学计量特征. 生态学报, 2013, 33 (15): 4674- 4682.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201212101772 |
|
Zhu Q L, Xing X Y, Zhang H, et al. Ecological stoichiometry characteristics of soil in different vegetation areas in loess hilly gully region. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33 (15): 4674- 4682.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201212101772 |
|
Cao Z, Fang X, Xiang W, et al. The vertical differences in the change rates and controlling factors of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen along vegetation restoration in a subtropical area of China. Sustainability, 2020, 12 (16): 6443.
doi: 10.3390/su12166443 |
|
Clemmensen K E, Bahr A, Ovaskainen O, et al. Roots and associated fungi drive long-term carbon sequestration in boreal forest. Science, 2013, 339 (6127): 1615- 1618.
doi: 10.1126/science.1231923 |
|
Deng L, Shangguan Z P. Afforestation drives soil carbon and nitrogen changes in China. Land Degradation & Development, 2017, 28 (1): 151- 165. | |
Don A, Schumacher J, Scherer-Lorenzen M, et al. Spatial and vertical variation of soil carbon at two grassland sites-Implications for measuring soil carbon stocks. Geoderma, 2007, 141 (3-4): 272- 282.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.06.003 |
|
Fu X, Shao M A, Wei X R, et al. Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen as affected by vegetation types in northern Loess Plateau of China. Geoderma, 2010, 155 (1-2): 31- 35.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.11.020 |
|
Guan H, Fan J. Effects of vegetation restoration on soil quality in fragile karst ecosystems of southwest China. PeerJ, 2020, 8 (3-4): e9456. | |
Kirschbaum M U F, Guo L B, Gifford R M. Observed and modelled soil carbon and nitrogen changes after planting a Pinus radiata stand onto former pasture . Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008, 40 (1): 247- 257.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.08.021 |
|
Lan J C, Hu N, Fu W L. Soil carbon–nitrogen coupled accumulation following the natural vegetation restoration of abandoned farmlands in a karst rocky desertification region. Ecological Engineering, 2020, 158, 106033.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.106033 |
|
Li C, Zhao L, Sun P, et al. Deep soil C, N, and P stocks and stoichiometry in response to land use patterns in the Loess Hilly Region of China. PLoS ONE, 2016, 11 (7): e0159075.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159075 |
|
Lu N, Liski J, Chang R Y, et al. Soil organic carbon dynamics of black locust plantations in the middle Loess Plateau area of China. Biogeosciences, 2013, 10 (11): 7053- 7063.
doi: 10.5194/bg-10-7053-2013 |
|
Ma R, Hu F, Liu J, et al. Shifts in soil nutrient concentrations and C: N: P stoichiometry during long-term natural vegetation restoration. PeerJ, 2020, 8, e8382.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.8382 |
|
Paul K I, Polglase P J, Nyakuengama J G, et al. Change in soil carbon following afforestation. Forest Ecology & Management, 2002, 168 (1-3): 241- 257. | |
Stockmanna U, Adamsa M A, Crawforda J W, et al. The knowns, known unknowns and unknowns of sequestration of soil organic carbon. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2013, 164, 80- 99. | |
Wang K B, Deng L, Ren Z P, et al. Dynamics of ecosystem carbon stocks during vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau of China. Journal of Arid Land, 2016, 8 (2): 207- 220.
doi: 10.1007/s40333-015-0091-3 |
|
Wang W, Sardans J, Zeng C, et al. Responses of soil nutrient concentrations and stoichiometry to different human land uses in a subtropical tidal wetland. Geoderma, 2014, 232, 459- 470. | |
Xue Z, An S. Changes in soil organic carbon and total nitrogen at a small watershed scale as the result of land use conversion on the Loess Plateau. Sustainability, 2018, 10 (12): 47- 57. | |
Zhang M H, Chen H, Zhu X M, et al. Effects of the addition of mineral nutrients on biological nitrogen fixation in forest ecosystems. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35 (24): 7941- 7954. | |
Zhang W, Wang K L, Liu S J, et al. Soil nutrient accumulation and its affecting factors during vegetation succession in karst peak-cluster depressions of south China. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24 (7): 1801- 1808. | |
Zhang Y, Xu X, Li Z, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration on soil quality in degraded karst landscapes of southwest China. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 650, 2657- 2665.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.372 |
|
Zhao X, Li J J, Li H J. Effects of vegetation restoration type on soil carbon, nitrogen, and microbial quantity in Guandi Mountain. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2010, 29 (11): 2102- 2110. |
[1] | 赵世魁,郭晋平,张芸香. 暖温带山地天然次生林演替序列根系呼吸速率对林地增温的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(2): 10-21. |
[2] | 王卫锋,赵瑜琦,高苗琴,宗毓铮,郝兴宇. 群众杨幼苗叶光合特性与碳氮分配对CO2浓度和气温升高的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(2): 40-47. |
[3] | 徐森,董亚文,陈双林,郭子武,杨丽婷,谢燕燕. 覆盖雷竹笋箨叶碳氮代谢特征及其与竹笋食味品质的关系[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(8): 109-116. |
[4] | 尚佳州,高钿惠,王卫锋,周新军,宗毓铮. 连续2年氮添加对中金杨幼苗叶光合特性与碳氮分配的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(6): 23-32. |
[5] | 杨静,张耀艺,谭思懿,廖姝,王定一,岳楷,倪祥银,吴福忠,杨玉盛. 中亚热带不同树种对土壤团聚体组成及其碳、氮含量的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(4): 51-61. |
[6] | 李聪,吕晶花,陆梅,杨志东,刘攀,任玉连,杜凡. 文山国家级自然保护区不同海拔地带性植被的土壤微生物生物量碳氮分布特征[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(3): 20-30. |
[7] | 孙晓丹,叶钰倩,王刚,关庆伟. 有机物覆盖的土壤环境效应作用机制研究现状与展望[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(6): 103-112. |
[8] | 张亦弛,郭素娟. 2种生长延缓剂对板栗枝条生长和叶片碳氮代谢物积累的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(5): 29-36. |
[9] | VuongThi Minh Dien,曾健勇,满秀玲. 樟子松天然林土壤碳氮含量与水解酶活性坡位差异及月动态[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(2): 40-47. |
[10] | 胡宗达,刘世荣,刘兴良,罗明霞,胡璟,李亚非,余昊,欧定华,吴德勇. 川西亚高山3种天然次生林土壤有机碳氮组分特征[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(11): 1-11. |
[11] | 张晓红,张会儒,卢军,雷相东. 目标树抚育间伐对蒙古栎天然次生林生长的初期影响[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(10): 83-92. |
[12] | 陈秀波, 朱德全, 赵晨晨, 张路路, 陈立新, 段文标. 凉水国家自然保护区不同林型红松林土壤nosZ型反硝化微生物群落组成和多样性分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(8): 106-117. |
[13] | 丁令智, 满秀玲, 肖瑞晗, 蔡体久. 寒温带森林根际土壤微生物量碳氮含量生长季内动态变化[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(7): 178-186. |
[14] | 李伟成, 盛海燕, 蒋跃平, 温星. 基塘系统不同竹林土壤CO2通量特征及其影响因子[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(8): 13-22. |
[15] | 余华, 钟全林, 程栋梁, 张中瑞, 徐朝斌, 郑文婷, 裴盼. 不同种源刨花楠林下幼苗叶片碳氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(12): 22-32. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||