林业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (2): 134-146.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20250482
• 研究论文 • 上一篇
林昕怡1,2,周星鲁1,3,张磊1,3,*(
),王丽娟1,3,安新民1,2,胡建军1,3
收稿日期:2025-08-02
修回日期:2025-09-19
出版日期:2026-02-25
发布日期:2026-03-04
通讯作者:
张磊
E-mail:leizhang1142@caf.ac.cn
基金资助:
Xinyi Lin1,2,Xinglu Zhou1,3,Lei Zhang1,3,*(
),Lijuan Wang1,3,Xinmin An1,2,Jianjun Hu1,3
Received:2025-08-02
Revised:2025-09-19
Online:2026-02-25
Published:2026-03-04
Contact:
Lei Zhang
E-mail:leizhang1142@caf.ac.cn
摘要:
目的: 系统评价第1代转BtCry1Ac基因欧洲黑杨及其转基因杂交F1代京兴1号和京兴2号的生物安全性,重点分析外源基因表达和抗虫性状的稳定性,并探讨其对根际土壤微生物和林内生物多样性的潜在影响,为转BtCry1Ac基因抗虫杨树安全性评价和产业化应用提供科学依据。方法: 通过PCR和RT-qPCR技术验证转基因杨树目标基因稳定性,测定各无性系树高、胸径评价生长表现;采用美国白蛾幼虫饲喂各无性系叶片18天评价抗虫性;应用标准方法测定各无性系根际土壤pH值及主要养分含量;利用16S/ITS高通量测序解析土壤微生物群落组成与多样性,结合样方调查和马氏网法监测林下杂草及节肢动物群落结构。结果: 1) PCR和RT-qPCR检测结果明确BtCry1Ac基因在第1代转基因欧洲黑杨和F1代转基因杂交子代中稳定存在并表达,特异性条带为546 bp。2) 生长调查表明,京兴1号和京兴2号的树高较对照108杨分别提高9.62%和7.56%,胸径分别提高17.57%和15.07%,但未达到显著性差异。3) 室内饲虫试验表明,与对照108杨相比,京兴1号和京兴2号对美国白蛾幼虫的抗性显著增强,饲喂18天后幼虫死亡率分别提升116.24%和96.21%。4) 根际土壤理化性质分析显示,除转基因无性系n208的根际土壤pH值显著升高外,有机质及氮、磷、钾养分含量在各无性系间无显著差异。5) 土壤微生物群落研究表明,细菌与真菌门水平优势类群(变形菌门及子囊菌门)组成未受显著影响;各无性系间细菌和真菌群落结构的α多样性指数无统计学差异;β多样性分析揭示真菌群落结构存在显著组间分化,而细菌群落保持稳定。6) 林下生物多样性调查记录到杂草8科14种、节肢动物6目22科,BtCry1Ac基因表达对杂草群落的物种丰富度、多样性、优势度和均匀度均未产生显著影响。转基因林地内目标害虫(鳞翅目)数量显著降低,但节肢动物群落整体结构与对照林地高度相似,关键多样性指数无显著变化。结论: 转BtCry1Ac基因杨树外源基因稳定存在并表现出较高抗虫性,未发现对土壤养分循环、微生物α多样性以及林下生物群落稳定性产生明显影响。杂交子代京兴1号、京兴2号有较好的抗虫优势,具有良好应用前景。本研究结果可为转基因杨树环境生物安全评价提供科学依据,建议开展长期监测以系统评价其对生态环境的影响。
中图分类号:
林昕怡,周星鲁,张磊,王丽娟,安新民,胡建军. 转BtCry1Ac基因杨树的生物安全性评价[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(2): 134-146.
Xinyi Lin,Xinglu Zhou,Lei Zhang,Lijuan Wang,Xinmin An,Jianjun Hu. Biosafety Assessment of Transgenic Poplar Expressing the BtCry1Ac Gene[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2026, 62(2): 134-146.
图2
美国白蛾幼虫饲喂与死亡率统计 A:幼虫取食一天后的叶片表型;B:幼虫死亡率;数据以均值 ± 标准差表示,显著性差异定义为:ns,P > 0.05;**,P < 0.01;***,P < 0.001;****,P < 0.0001。A: Leaf phenotype after one-day larval feeding; B: Larval mortality rate; Data are presented as mean ± SD; Significant differences are defined as follows: ns, P > 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001."
表1
根际土壤理化性质测定①"
| 测定指标 Measured Parameters | n208 | 京兴1号 Jingxing 1 | 京兴2号 Jingxing 2 | 108杨 P.×euramericana‘Guariento’ | P值 P value |
| pH | 7.830 ± 0.050a | 7.675 ± 0.035b | 7.685 ± 0.095b | 7.675 ± 0.015b | 0.026 |
| 有机质OM/(g·kg?1) | 18.258 ± 1.697a | 17.132 ± 1.858a | 17.329 ±1.628a | 18.679 ± 1.156a | 0.613 |
| 全氮TN/(g·kg?1) | 1.318 ± 0.184a | 1.039 ± 0.110a | 1.159 ± 0.029a | 1.365 ± 0.144a | 0.052 |
| 全磷TP/(g·kg?1) | 3.530 ± 0.296a | 3.193 ± 0.191a | 3.182 ± 0.147a | 3.522 ± 0.174a | 0.123 |
| 全钾TK/(g·kg?1) | 3.763 ± 0.140a | 3.786 ± 0.179a | 3.624 ± 0.021a | 3.632 ± 0.018a | 0.252 |
| 速效氮AN/(mg·kg?1) | 138.764 ± 21.520a | 124.616 ± 12.261a | 145.730 ± 10.642a | 155.066 ± 10.384a | 0.09 |
| 速效磷AP/(mg·kg?1) | 222.038 ± 6.377a | 209.568 ± 3.294a | 216.805 ± 15.382a | 213.947 ± 1.899a | 0.395 |
| 速效钾AK/(mg·kg?1) | 107.501 ± 0.043a | 105.267 ± 2.544a | 102.684 ± 4.893a | 107.311 ± 0.049a | 0.194 |
表2
各无性系根际土壤细菌及真菌α多样性对比"
| 种类 Species | 样品 Sample | 香农多样性指数 Shannon index | 辛普森优势度指数 Simpson index | Chao1丰富度指数 Chao1 index | ACE丰富度指数 ACE index | 系统发育多样性指数 Phylogenetic diversity index |
| 细菌 Bacteria | n208 | 10.40 ± 0.15a | 0.999 ± 0.000a | 3 058.80 ± 170.47a | 3 065.87 ± 169.582a | 28.03 ± 4.92a |
| 京兴1号Jingxing 1 | 10.24 ± 0.02a | 0.998 ± 0.000a | 2 866.42 ± 95.98a | 2 873.79 ± 96.35a | 31.36 ± 1.40a | |
| 京兴2号Jingxing 2 | 10.22 ± 0.13a | 0.998 ± 0.000a | 2 713.25 ± 162.62a | 2 719.20 ± 163.48a | 32.16 ± 0.87a | |
| 108杨 P.×euramericana ‘Guariento’ | 10.26 ± 0.21a | 0.998 ± 0.001a | 2 878.98 ± 218.12a | 2 885.68 ± 219.27a | 32.74 ± 0.54a | |
| 真菌 Fungi | n208 | 6.86 ± 0.36a | 0.970 ± 0.004a | 553.36 ± 134.28a | 553.65 ± 134.12a | 43.24 ± 7.35a |
| 京兴1号Jingxing 1 | 6.04 ± 0.13a | 0.962 ± 0.012a | 310.47 ± 66.18a | 311.04 ± 65.99a | 32.78 ± 6.39a | |
| 京兴2号Jingxing 2 | 5.48 ± 1.23a | 0.924 ± 0.070a | 244.70 ± 41.56a | 245.12 ± 41.58a | 32.53 ± 9.12a | |
| 108杨 P.×euramericana ‘Guariento’ | 5.90 ± 1.07a | 0.938 ± 0.056a | 316.09 ± 150.98a | 316.60 ± 151.12a | 31.01 ± 6.43a |
表3
林下杂草群落科、种分布"
| 科Families | 种Species |
| 唇形科Labiatae | 夏至草Lagopsis supina、灯笼草Clinopodium polycephalum |
| 禾本科Poaceae | 狗尾草Setaria viridis、牛筋草Eleusine indica |
| 菊科Asteraceae | 黄花蒿Artemisia annua、泥胡菜Hemistepta lyrata、小蓬草Erigeron canadensis、 中华苦荬菜Ixeris chinensis |
| 茜草科Rubiaceae | 茜草Rubia cordifolia |
| 十字花科Brassicaceae | 诸葛菜Orychophragmus violaceus、独行菜Lepidium apetalum |
| 苋科Amaranthaceae | 灰菜Chenopodium album |
| 鸭跖草科Commelinaceae | 饭包草Commelina benghalensis |
| 紫草科Boraginaceae | 附地菜Trigonotis peduncularis |
表4
林内节肢动物群落目、科分布"
| 目 Orders | 科 Families |
| 半翅目Hemiptera | 蝽科Pentatomidae |
| 鳞翅目Lepidoptera | 菜蛾科Plutellidae、尺蛾科Geometridae、粉蝶科Pieridae、卷蛾科Tortricidae、螟蛾科Pyralidae、 透翅蛾科Sesidae、谷蛾科Tineidae、枯叶蛾科Lasiocampidae、夜蛾科Noctuidae |
| 脉翅目Neuroptera | 蚁蛉科Myrmeleontidae |
| 膜翅目Hymenoptera | 姬蜂科Ichneumonidae、胡蜂科Vespidae、茧蜂科Braconidae、切叶蜂科Megachilidae、蚁科Formicidae |
| 鞘翅目Coleoptera | 瓢虫科Coccinellidae、窃蠹科Anobidae、肖叶甲科Eumolpidae |
| 双翅目Diptera | 虻科Tabanidae、食虫虻科Asilidae、蝇科Muscidae |
图6
林内节肢动物群落物种数量及相关性分析 A:节肢动物群落数量;B:不同类型昆虫群落数量之间的相关性分析;C:T1与C1群落组成相似性分析;D:T1与C2群落组成相似性分析。A: Arthropod community abundance; B: Correlation analysis between different types of insect communities; C: Similarity analysis of community composition between T1 and C1; D: Similarity analysis of community composition between T1 and C2."
| 白 鑫. 2019. 转BADH基因玉米对土壤理化性质及微生物多样性的影响. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学. | |
| Bai X. 2019. Effects of BADH transgenic maize on soil physicochemical properties and microbial diversity. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University. [in Chinese] | |
|
陈红星, 王仁杰, 邵春瑞, 等. 转cry1Ac基因玉米对地表节肢动物群落的影响. 四川农业大学学报, 2022, 40 (1): 125- 129.
doi: 10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.202107004 |
|
|
Chen H X, Wang R J, Shao C R, et al. Effects of transgenic cry1Ac Corns on the soil surface arthropods communities in corn fields. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2022, 40 (1): 125- 129.
doi: 10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.202107004 |
|
|
陈 茂, 叶恭银, 姚洪渭, 等. 抗虫转基因水稻对非靶标害虫褐飞虱取食与产卵行为影响的评价. 中国农业科学, 2004 (2): 222- 226.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2004.02.010 |
|
|
Chen M, Ye G Y, Yao H W, et al. Evaluation of the impact of insect-resistant transgenic Rice on the feeding and oviposition behavior of its non-target insect, the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Homptera: Delphacidae). Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2004 (2): 222- 226.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2004.02.010 |
|
|
陈彦君, 李俊生, 闫 冰, 等. 转Cry1Ah基因抗虫玉米HGK60对生物多样性的影响. 环境科学研究, 2021, 34 (4): 964- 975.
doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2020.12.15 |
|
|
Chen Y J, Li J S, Yan B, et al. Impact of transgenic insect-resistant Maize HGK60 with Cry1Ah gene on biodiversity in the fields. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34 (4): 964- 975.
doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2020.12.15 |
|
|
丁莉萍, 王宏芝, 魏建华. 杨树转基因研究进展及展望. 林业科学研究, 2016, 29 (1): 124- 132.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2016.01.018 |
|
|
Ding L P, Wang H Z, Wei J H. Progress and prospect of research in transgenic poplar. Forest Research, 2016, 29 (1): 124- 132.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2016.01.018 |
|
|
杜 坤, 李金萍, 王 婷, 等. 转抗草甘膦基因甘蓝型油菜根际土壤理化性质及真菌群落多样性. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43 (4): 1082- 1091.
doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202403.015 |
|
|
Du K, Li J P, Wang T, et al. Physicochemical properties and fungal community diversity in rhizosphere soil of transgenic glyphosate-resistant Brassica napus. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2024, 43 (4): 1082- 1091.
doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202403.015 |
|
| 韩昆瑾, 郭娟娟, 吕梓晴, 等. 转多基因107杨对目标害虫的抗性检测. 林业科学, 2021, 57 (11): 85- 93. | |
| Han K J, Guo J J, Lü Z J, et al. Detection of resistance of multi-gene transgenic Populus×euramericana ‘Neva’ to target pests. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57 (11): 85- 93. | |
|
贾会霞, 孙 佩, 李建波, 等. 丹红杨×转BtCry1Ac欧洲黑杨杂交子代抗虫性及生长量测定. 分子植物育种, 2017, 15 (10): 4101- 4109.
doi: 10.13271/j.mpb.015.004101 |
|
|
Jia H X, Sun P, Li J B, et al. Insect-resistance and growth measurement of hybrid progeny from Populus deltoides cl. ‘Danhong’ and trandgenic P. nigra with Btcry1Ac gene. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2017, 15 (10): 4101- 4109.
doi: 10.13271/j.mpb.015.004101 |
|
| 姜文虎, 张德健, 刘军侠, 等. 转Bt基因和非转基因杨树-棉花复合系统中节肢动物群落比较分析. 林业科学, 2018, 54 (10): 73- 79. | |
| Jiang W H, Zhang D J, Liu J X, et al. Comparative analysis of arthropod communities in transgenic Bt and non-transgenic poplar-catton composite systems. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54 (10): 73- 79. | |
| 李 静. 2019. 转基因棉长期种植对土壤质量的影响. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学. | |
| Li J. 2019. Effects of long-term planting of transgenic cotton on soil quality. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University. [in Chinese] | |
| 李文娣. 2024. 转基因抗虫、耐除草剂大豆MCV-1对土壤理化性质及土壤微生物影响的研究. 泰安: 山东农业大学. | |
| Li W D. 2024. Studies on the effects of transgenic insect-resistant and herbicid-tolerant soybean MCV-1 on soil physicochemical properties and soil microorganisms. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University. [in Chinese] | |
|
刘来盘, 沈文静, 薛 堃, 等. 转g10-epsps基因耐除草剂大豆ZUTS-33对农田生物多样性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31 (1): 122- 128.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202001.010 |
|
|
Liu L P, Shen W J, Xue K, et al. Impacts of herbicide-resistant soybean ZUTS-33 with g10-epsps gene on field biodiversity. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31 (1): 122- 128.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202001.010 |
|
|
刘清松, 李云河, 陈秀萍, 等. 转基因抗虫植物-植食性昆虫-天敌间化学通讯的研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25 (8): 2431- 2439.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.20140530.011 |
|
|
Liu Q S, Li Y H, Chen X P, et al. Research progress in chemical communication among insect-resistant genetically modified plants, insect pests and natural enemies. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25 (8): 2431- 2439.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.20140530.011 |
|
| 鲁如坤. 2000,. 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社. | |
| Lu R K. 2000,. Analytical methods for soil agricultural chemistry. Beijing: China Agriculture Science and Technology Press. [in Chinese] | |
|
吕秀华. 转基因银中杨对根际土壤微生物的影响. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2018, 37 (5): 1965- 1970.
doi: 10.13417/j.gab.037.001965 |
|
|
Lü X H. The impact of transgenic poplar on soil microorganism group. Genomics and Applied Biology, 2018, 37 (5): 1965- 1970.
doi: 10.13417/j.gab.037.001965 |
|
|
束长龙, 张风娇, 黄 颖, 等. Bt杀虫基因研究现状与趋势. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2016, 46 (5): 548- 555.
doi: 10.1360/N052016-00092 |
|
|
Shu C L, Zhang F J, Huang Y, et al. Current status and research trends of Bt insecticidal gene. Scientia Sinica(Vitae), 2016, 46 (5): 548- 555.
doi: 10.1360/N052016-00092 |
|
|
苏 军, 陈 睿, 姚玉仙, 等. 转CryIAb水稻对稻田杂草群落组成及多样性的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21 (12): 1500- 1506.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2013.30440 |
|
|
Su J, Chen R, Yao Y X, et al. Composition and diversity of weed community in transgenic CryIAb rice field. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2013, 21 (12): 1500- 1506.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2013.30440 |
|
|
孙伟博, 王 璞, 杨梓堃, 等. 转Bt基因南林895杨对美国白蛾抗虫性研究. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2020, 40 (7): 107- 118.
doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2020.07.014 |
|
|
Sun W B, Wang P, Yang Z K, et al. Study on the insect resistance of Bt transgenic poplar Nanlin 895 to Hyphantria cunea. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2020, 40 (7): 107- 118.
doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2020.07.014 |
|
| 萧刚柔, 李镇宇. 2020. 中国森林昆虫. 北京: 中国林业出版社. | |
| Xiao G R, Li Z Y. 2020. Forest insects of China. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. [in Chinese] | |
|
尹俊琦, 武奉慈, 周 琳, 等. 转Cry1Ac基因抗虫玉米Bt-799对田间节肢动物群落多样性的影响. 生物安全学报, 2017, 26 (2): 159- 167.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1787.2017.02.009 |
|
|
Yin J Q, Wu F C, Zhou L, et al. Impacts of a transgenic insect-resistant maize (Bt-799) containing a Cry1Ac gene on arthropod biodiversity. Journal of Biosafety, 2017, 26 (2): 159- 167.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1787.2017.02.009 |
|
| 岳莉莉. 2018. 转 mcry1F 基因抗虫玉米 G1F-19 对田间地上部节肢动物群落结构的影响. 长春: 吉林大学. | |
| Yue L L. 2018. Impacts of transgenic insect-resistant maize (G1F-19) containing mcry1F gene on overground arthropod community structure. Changchun: Jilin University. [in Chinese] | |
| 张 超. 2023. 欧美杨PeWRKY70调控杨树抗虫的分子机制. 保定: 河北农业大学. | |
| Zhang C. 2023. Molecular mechanism of regulating insect resistance by PeWRKY70 from Populus × euramericana. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University. [in Chinese] | |
|
张 磊, 周星鲁, 王丽娟, 等. 杨树抗虫分子育种与转基因生物安全评价研究进展. 林业科学, 2025, 61 (2): 190- 203.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20240263 |
|
|
Zhang L, Zhou X L, Wang L J, et al. Advance of poplar molecular breeding with insect resistance and transgenic biosafety assessment research. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61 (2): 190- 203.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20240263 |
|
| 张巍巍, 李元胜. 2019. 中国昆虫生态大图鉴. 2版. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社. | |
| Zhang W W, Li Y S. 2019. Chinese insects illustrated. 2nd ed. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press. [in Chinese] | |
| 周晓莉. 2021. 转基因抗虫耐除草剂复合性状大豆对土壤理化性质及丛枝菌根真菌多样性的影响. 南京: 南京农业大学. | |
| Zhou X L. 2021. Effects of insect resistant and herbicide tolerant transgenic Soybean on soil physical and chemical properties and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi diversity. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University. [in Chinese] | |
|
Bai S J, Li J W, He Z L, et al. GeoChip-based analysis of the functional gene diversity and metabolic potential of soil microbial communities of mangroves. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology, 2013, 97 (15): 7035- 7048.
doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4496-z |
|
|
Bulgarelli D, Rott M, Schlaeppi K, et al. Revealing structure and assembly cues for Arabidopsis root-inhabiting bacterial microbiota. Nature, 2012, 488 (7409): 91- 95.
doi: 10.1038/nature11336 |
|
|
Deng P J, Zhou X Y, Yang D Y, et al. The definition, source, manifestation and assessment of unintended effects in genetically modified plants. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2008, 88 (14): 2401- 2413.
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.3371 |
|
|
Garland G, Edlinger A, Banerjee S, et al. Crop cover is more important than rotational diversity for soil multifunctionality and cereal yields in European cropping systems. Nature Food, 2021, 2 (1): 28- 37.
doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-00210-8 |
|
|
Hungria M, Mendes I C, Nakatani A S, et al. Effects of the glyphosate-resistance gene and herbicides on soybean: field trials monitoring biological nitrogen fixation and yield. Field Crops Research, 2014, 158, 43- 54.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.022 |
|
| Krebs C J. 1999. Ecological methodology. Addison Wesley Logman, California: 373−454. | |
|
Lee Z L, Bu N S, Cui J, et al. Effects of long-term cultivation of transgenic Bt rice (Kefeng-6) on soil microbial functioning and C cycling. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7 (1): 4647.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04997-8 |
|
|
Liang J G, Luan Y, Jiao Y, et al. No significant differences in rhizosphere bacterial communities between Bt maize cultivar IE09S034 and the near-isogenic non- Bt cultivar Zong31. Plant, Soil and Environment, 2018, 64 (9): 427- 434.
doi: 10.17221/260/2018-PSE |
|
| Mandal A, Sarkar B, Owens G, et al. Impact of genetically modified crops on rhizosphere microorganisms and processes: a review focusing on Bt cotton. Applied Soil Ecology, 2020, 148, 103492. | |
|
Tao J M, Liu X D, Liang Y L, et al. Maize growth responses to soil microbes and soil properties after fertilization with different green manures. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology, 2017, 101 (3): 1289- 1299.
doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7938-1 |
|
|
Turrini A, Sbrana C, Giovannetti M. Belowground environmental effects of transgenic crops: a soil microbial perspective. Research Microbiol, 2015, 166 (3): 121- 131.
doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2015.02.006 |
|
| Xia L L, Cao L, Yang Y, et al. Integrated biochar solutions can achieve carbon-neutral staple crop production. Nature Food, 2023, 4 (3): 236- 246. | |
| Xiang X D, Zhou X L, Zi H L, et al. Populus cathayana genome and population resequencing provide insights into its evolution and adaptation. Horticulture Research, 2024, 11 (1): 217- 230. | |
|
Zuo L H, Yang R L, Zhen Z X, et al. A 5-year field study showed no apparent effect of the Bt transgenic 741 poplar on the arthropod community and soil bacterial diversity. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8 (1): 1956.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20322-3 |
| [1] | 刘鲁霞,胡波,桑国庆,刘玉玉. 激光雷达森林结构指标在森林植物多样性评估中的研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(1): 176-196. |
| [2] | 杨阳,王宝荣,孙慧,周媛媛,乔江波,宋怡,张萍萍,李自民,王云强,安韶山. 地球关键带土壤微生物介导有机碳转化研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(7): 165-174. |
| [3] | 刘相荣,孙启武,厚凌宇,庞忠义,张琰琳,丁昌俊. 松辽平原杨树人工林土壤微生物群落结构及其功能多样性的林龄差异[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(11): 25-36. |
| [4] | 王宏星,孙晓梅,陈东升,吴春燕,张守攻. 适度间伐对日本落叶松人工林生物多样性和土壤多功能性影响[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(6): 1-11. |
| [5] | 陆日,王晨,陈烨,许茜茜,胡玥,陈峥,曹镓玺,武曙红,李玲,高鹤. 红树林保护碳汇项目碳信用计量方法——以深圳市福田红树林保护区为例[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(3): 44-53. |
| [6] | 张萌,范秀华,岳庆敏,韩卓秀,黄一鑫. 吉林蛟河针阔混交林生物与非生物因素对生产力的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(12): 71-77. |
| [7] | 靳正雅,钱沉鱼,杜澄举,马涛,温秀军,王偲. 白蚁、黏土与生态环境相互作用研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(1): 143-150. |
| [8] | 彭金根,龚金玉,范玉海,张华,张银凤,白宇清,王艳梅,谢利娟. 毛棉杜鹃根际与非根际土壤微生物群落多样性[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(2): 89-99. |
| [9] | 曹俐,王阳,杨蕴力,郑雨,王伟,刘桂丰,姜静. 转BpGLK裂叶桦生长变异、根际土壤酶活性及微生物群落组成[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(12): 21-31. |
| [10] | 陈永忠,刘彩霞,许彦明,张震,彭映赫,陈隆升,苏以荣,王瑞,唐炜. 生草栽培对油茶林土壤微生物群落结构和稳定性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(11): 61-70. |
| [11] | 于水今,王娟,何海燕,张春雨,赵秀海. 针阔混交林生物量稳定性驱动因子[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(11): 181-190. |
| [12] | 张伟溪,王颜波,丁昌俊,朱文旭,苏晓华. 成龄转基因银中杨试验林外源基因水平转移及土壤微生物连年监测[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(1): 52-61. |
| [13] | 郑翔,曹敏敏,纪小芳,方万力,刘胜龙,姜姜. 森林土壤氧化亚氮排放对磷添加响应的研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(6): 150-157. |
| [14] | 谢云,郭芳芸,陈丽华,曹兵. 大气CO2浓度升高对宁夏枸杞根区土壤微生物功能多样性及碳源利用特征的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(4): 163-172. |
| [15] | 李益,冯秀秀,赵发珠,郭垚鑫,王俊,任成杰. 秦岭太白山不同海拔锐齿栎林土壤微生物群落的变化特征[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(12): 22-31. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||