|
郭志华, 臧润国, 蒋有绪. 生物多样性的形态、维持机制及其宏观研究方法. 林业科学, 2002, 38 (6): 116- 124.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2002.06.020
|
|
Guo Z H, Zang R G, Jiang Y X. The formation and maintenance mechanisms of biodiversity and the research techniques for biodiversity. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2002, 38 (6): 116- 124.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2002.06.020
|
|
谭凌照, 范春雨, 范秀华. 吉林蛟河阔叶红松林木本植物物种多样性及群落结构与生产力的关系. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41 (11): 1149- 1156.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0321
|
|
Tan L Z, Fan C Y, Fan X H. Relationships between species diversity or community structure and productivity of woody-plants in a broad-leaved Korean pine forest in Jiaohe, Jilin, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2017, 41 (11): 1149- 1156.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0321
|
|
温 纯, 金光泽. 功能多样性对典型阔叶红松林生产力的影响. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43 (2): 94- 106.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2018.0312
|
|
Wen C, Jin G Z. Effects of functional diversity on productivity in a typical mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forest. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2019, 43 (2): 94- 106.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2018.0312
|
|
吴兆飞, 张雨秋, 张忠辉, 等. 东北温带森林林分结构与生产力关系研究. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41 (5): 48- 55.
doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190017
|
|
Wu Z F, Zhang Y Q, Zhang Z H, et al. Study on the relationship between forest structure and productivity oftemperate forests in northeast China. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41 (5): 48- 55.
doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190017
|
|
杨桂娟, 胡海帆, 孙洪刚, 等. 林分年龄, 造林密度和林分自然稀疏对杉木人工林个体大小分化和生产力关系的影响. 林业科学, 2019, 55 (11): 126- 136.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20191114
|
|
Yang G J, Hu H F, Sun H G, et al. The formation and maintenance mechanisms of biodiversity and the research techniques for biodiversity. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55 (11): 126- 136.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20191114
|
|
Ali A. Forest stand structure and functioning: Current knowledge and future challenges. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 98, 665- 677.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.017
|
|
Ali A, Mattsson E. Disentangling the effects of species diversity, and intraspecific and interspecific tree size variation on aboveground biomass in dry zone homegarden agroforestry systems. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 598, 38- 48.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.131
|
|
de Avila A L, van der Sande M T, Dormann C F, et al. Disturbance intensity is a stronger driver of biomass recovery than remaining tree-community attributes in a managed Amazonian forest. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 55 (4): 1647- 1657.
doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13134
|
|
Brienen R J W, Phillips O L, Feldpausch T R, et al. Long-term decline of the Amazon carbon sink. Nature, 2015, 519 (7543): 344- 348.
doi: 10.1038/nature14283
|
|
Chao K-J, Phillips O L, Gloor E, et al. 2008. Growth and wood density predict tree mortality in Amazon forests. Journal of Ecology, 96(2) : 281–292.
|
|
Coomes D A, Holdaway R J, Kobe R K, et al. A general integrative framework for modelling woody biomass production and carbon sequestration rates in forests: Forest growth and carbon sequestration rates. Journal of Ecology, 2012, 100 (1): 42- 64.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01920.x
|
|
Faith D P. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biological Conservation, 1992, 61 (1): 1- 10.
doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3
|
|
Finegan B, Peña-Claros M, de Oliveira A, et al. Does functional trait diversity predict above-ground biomass and productivity of tropical forests? Testing three alternative hypotheses. Journal of Ecology, 2015, 103 (1): 191- 201.
doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12346
|
|
Fortunel C, Lasky J R, Uriarte M, et al. 2018. Topography and neighborhood crowding can interact to shape species growth and distribution in a diverse Amazonian forest. Ecology, 99(10) : 2272–2283.
|
|
Fotis A T, Murphy S J, Ricart R D, et al. 2018. Above-ground biomass is driven by mass-ratio effects and stand structural attributes in a temperate deciduous forest. Journal of Ecology, 106(2) : 561–570.
|
|
Fox J. 2008. Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models. 2rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
|
|
Grime J P 1998. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. Journal of Ecology, 86(6) : 902–910.
|
|
Hao M, Messier C, Geng Y, et al. Functional traits influence biomass and productivity through multiple mechanisms in a temperate secondary forest. European Journal of Forest Research, 2020, 139 (6): 959- 968.
doi: 10.1007/s10342-020-01298-0
|
|
Hao M, Zhang C, Zhao X, et al. Functional and phylogenetic diversity determine woody productivity in a temperate forest. Ecology and Evolution, 2018, 8 (5): 2395- 2406.
doi: 10.1002/ece3.3857
|
|
Houghton R A, Hall F, Goetz S J. Importance of biomass in the global carbon cycle: biomass in the global carbon cycle. Journal of Geophysical Research:Biogeosciences, 2009, 114 (G2): G00E03.
|
|
Lohbeck M, Poorter L, Martínez-Ramos M, et al. Biomass is the main driver of changes in ecosystem process rates during tropical forest succession. Ecology, 2015, 96 (5): 1242- 1252.
doi: 10.1890/14-0472.1
|
|
McDowell N, Allen C D, Anderson-Teixeira K, et al. Drivers and mechanisms of tree mortality in moist tropical forests. New Phytologist, 2018, 219 (3): 851- 869.
doi: 10.1111/nph.15027
|
|
Michaletz S T, Cheng D, Kerkhoff A J, et al. Convergence of terrestrial plant production across global climate gradients. Nature, 2014, 512 (7512): 39- 43.
doi: 10.1038/nature13470
|
|
Mori A S. Environmental controls on the causes and functional consequences of tree species diversity. Journal of Ecology, 2018, 106 (1): 113- 125.
doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12851
|
|
Ouyang S, Xiang W, Wang X, et al. Effects of stand age, richness and density on productivity in subtropical forests in China. Journal of Ecology, 2019, 107 (5): 2266- 2277.
doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13194
|
|
Prado-Junior J A, Schiavini I, Vale V S, et al. Conservative species drive biomass productivity in tropical dry forests. Journal of Ecology, 2016, 104 (3): 817- 827.
doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12543
|
|
Purschke O, Schmid B C, Sykes M T, et al. Contrasting changes in taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity during a long-term succession: insights into assembly processes. Journal of Ecology, 2013, 101 (4): 857- 866.
|
|
Quesada C A, Phillips O L, Schwarz M, et al. 2012. Basin-wide variations in Amazon forest structure and function are mediated by both soils and climate. Biogeosciences, 9(6) : 2203–2246.
|
|
Ruiz-Benito P, Ratcliffe S, Jump A S, et al. 2017a. Functional diversity underlies demographic responses to environmental variation in European forests: Tree diversity and demography in European forests. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 26(2) : 128–141.
|
|
Ruiz-Benito P, Ratcliffe S, Zavala M A, et al. 2017b. Climate and successional-related changes in functional composition of European forests are strongly driven by tree mortality. Global Change Biology, 23(10) : 4162–4176.
|
|
Stephenson N L, Das A J, Condit R, et al. Rate of tree carbon accumulation increases continuously with tree size. Nature, 2014, 507 (7490): 90- 93.
|
|
van der Sande M T, Peña-Claros M, Ascarrunz N, et al. Abiotic and biotic drivers of biomass change in a Neotropical forest. Journal of Ecology, 2017, 105 (5): 1223- 1234.
doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12756
|
|
Yuan Z, Ali A, Wang S, et al. Abiotic and biotic determinants of coarse woody productivity in temperate mixed forests. Science of The Total Environment, 2018, 630, 422- 431.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.125
|
|
Yuan Z, Ali A, Wang S, et al. Temporal stability of aboveground biomass is governed by species asynchrony in temperate forests. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 107, 105661.
|
|
Yue Q, Hao M, Li X, et al. Assessing biotic and abiotic effects on forest productivity in three temperate forests. Ecology and Evolution, 2020, 10 (14): 7887- 7900.
doi: 10.1002/ece3.6516
|
|
Zhang Y, Chen H Y H. Individual size inequality links forest diversity and above-ground biomass. Journal of Ecology, 2015, 103 (5): 1245- 1252.
doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12425
|
|
Zhang Y, Chen H Y H, Reich P B. Forest productivity increases with evenness, species richness and trait variation: a global meta-analysis: Diversity and productivity relationships. Journal of Ecology, 2012, 100 (3): 742- 749.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01944.x
|