林业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (3): 171-181.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20250303
徐雅雯1,4,徐永杰1,4,*(
),谭作枰1,3,王其竹2,邹巧玲2,陈万胜2
收稿日期:2025-05-13
修回日期:2025-07-01
出版日期:2026-03-15
发布日期:2026-03-12
通讯作者:
徐永杰
E-mail:498674563@qq.com
基金资助:
Yawen Xu1,4,Yongjie Xu1,4,*(
),Zuoping Tan1,3,Qizhu Wang2,Qiaoling Zou2,Wansheng Chen2
Received:2025-05-13
Revised:2025-07-01
Online:2026-03-15
Published:2026-03-12
Contact:
Yongjie Xu
E-mail:498674563@qq.com
摘要:
目的: 探明土壤肥力、树体营养与核桃产量的定量关系,构建多因素产量预测模型以指导施肥管理,突破单一营养诊断技术的局限性,为核桃园精准施肥提供科学依据。方法: 选取湖北省保康县34个核桃园为研究对象,基于单位面积产量(kg·hm–2)将其划分为高产园(≥
中图分类号:
徐雅雯,徐永杰,谭作枰,王其竹,邹巧玲,陈万胜. 基于多因素分析的核桃园营养诊断与产量预测模型[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(3): 171-181.
Yawen Xu,Yongjie Xu,Zuoping Tan,Qizhu Wang,Qiaoling Zou,Wansheng Chen. A Nutritional Diagnosis and Yield Prediction Model for Walnut Orchards Based on Multi-Factor Analysis[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2026, 62(3): 171-181.
表3
不同产量园的土壤元素肥力指数①"
| 果园类型 Orchard types | pH | 水解性氮指数 Hydrolyzable nitrogen index | 有效钾指数 Available potassium index | 有机质指数 Organic material index | 有效磷指数 Available phosphorus index | 肥力指数 Fertility index |
| 高产园High-yield orchard | 2.542±0.470a | 1.846±0.485a | 2.206±0.494a | 2.651±0.494a | 2.764±0.572a | 1.660±0.262a |
| 中产园Middle-yield orchard | 2.276±0.484a | 1.720±0.388a | 2.312±0.460a | 2.436±0.642a | 2.458±0.482a | 1.566±0.185a |
| 低产园Low-yield orchard | 2.448±0.511a | 1.628±0.567a | 2.080±0.290a | 2.520±0.610a | 2.069±0.848a | 1.453±0.268a |
表4
不同产量水平果园的叶片和顶芽生理特征①"
| 果园类型 Orchard types | 叶片厚度 Thickness of leaf /mm | 叶片鲜质量 Fresh weight of leaf/g | 叶片干质量 Dry weight of leaf/g | 叶轴鲜质量 Fresh weight of leaf axis/g | 叶轴干质量 Dry weight of leaf axis/g | 顶芽长度 Length of leaf bud/mm | 顶芽直径 Diameter of leaf bud/mm |
| 高产园High-yield orchard | 0.26±0.02a | 2.54±0.53a | 1.46±0.30a | 1.84±0.27a | 0.55±0.12a | 6.14±0.69a | 5.59±0.44a |
| 中产园Middle-yield orchard | 0.25±0.02a | 1.79±0.33b | 1.13±0.20b | 1.30±0.15b | 0.43±0.05b | 6.26±0.59a | 5.58±0.29a |
| 低产园Low-yield orchard | 0.25±0.03a | 1.41±0.32b | 0.98±0.25b | 1.01±0.25c | 0.32±0.07c | 5.69±0.57a | 5.10±0.46b |
表6
叶片DRIS诊断指数及需肥顺序①"
| 果园类型及编号 Orchard type and number | N | P | K | Ca | S | 需肥顺序 Order of nutrient requirement | 营养不平 衡指数 Nutritional imbalance index | |
| 高产园 High-yield orchard | 1 | 856.85 | –357.41 | –536.09 | 1 827.33 | ?1 790.69 | S>K>P>N>Ca | 1 073.67 |
| 2 | 2 320.63 | –2 687.16 | 709.30 | 13.27 | ?356.03 | P>S>Ca>K>N | 1 217.28 | |
| 3 | 2 452.11 | –1 325.81 | 1 153.60 | –1 523.27 | ?756.64 | Ca>P>S>K>N | 1 442.29 | |
| 4 | –1 001.55 | 1 608.39 | –1 412.44 | 502.93 | 302.67 | K>N>S>Ca>P | 965.60 | |
| 5 | –1 168.99 | 4 622.28 | 1 646.99 | –2 904.28 | ?2 196.00 | Ca>S>N>K>P | 2 507.71 | |
| 6 | 203.95 | 129.14 | 2 780.99 | –2 608.29 | ?505.79 | Ca>S>P>N>K | 1 245.63 | |
| 7 | 1 205.61 | –1 702.37 | 167.12 | ?88.68 | 418.32 | P>Ca>K>S>N | 716.42 | |
| 8 | –519.19 | –652.78 | –1 667.70 | 2 525.80 | 313.87 | K>P>N>S>Ca | 1 135.87 | |
| 9 | 765.32 | –1 829.08 | 105.63 | 769.86 | 188.27 | P>K>S>N>Ca | 731.63 | |
| 10 | –760.02 | 446.51 | –258.11 | 515.39 | 56.24 | N>K>S>P>Ca | 407.25 | |
| 11 | –217.08 | 340.86 | –3 533.17 | 3 270.33 | 139.05 | K>N>S>P>Ca | 1 500.10 | |
| 12 | 57.75 | 525.14 | –225.55 | ?517.40 | 160.07 | Ca>K>N>S>P | 297.18 | |
| 13 | –1 554.17 | 347.41 | 2 806.03 | ?820.70 | ?778.56 | N>Ca>S>P>K | 1 261.37 | |
| 14 | –2 522.21 | 1 719.95 | 2 140.59 | ?192.42 | ?1 145.91 | N>S>Ca>P>K | 1 544.22 | |
| 15 | –250.53 | –961.28 | –933.73 | 3 106.32 | ?960.78 | P>S>K>N>Ca | 1 242.53 | |
| 16 | 2 103.44 | 1 650.36 | –2 619.24 | ?786.67 | ?347.89 | K>Ca>S>P>N | 1 501.52 | |
| 17 | 192.02 | 605.01 | –1 811.61 | 519.51 | 495.07 | K>N>S>Ca>P | 724.64 | |
| 18 | –1 170.00 | 1 143.32 | 1 200.25 | ?990.44 | ?183.13 | N>Ca>S>P>K | 937.43 | |
| 19 | ? | – | 488.15 | ?5 072.86 | 11 079.79 | Ca>P>N>K>S | 4 627.17 | |
| 20 | 67.49 | 10.47 | –418.38 | 1 058.35 | ?717.93 | S>K>P>N>Ca | 454.52 | |
| 平均值Average | –51.56a | –38.47a | –10.87b | ?69.80a | 170.70a | — | 1 276.70a | |
| 标准差Standard deviation | 1 385.66 | 1 893.03 | 1 706.11 | 2 030.63 | 2 669.21 | — | 932.64 | |
| 负值频次Counts of negative values | 10 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 11 | — | — | |
| 中产园 Middle-yield orchard | 1 | 200.33 | 1 181.31 | 933.88 | ?2 232.88 | ?82.64 | Ca>S>N>K>P | 926.21 |
| 2 | 537.42 | ?1 557.01 | 903.51 | ?684.01 | 800.10 | P>Ca>N>S>K | 896.41 | |
| 3 | ?1 635.24 | 3 030.34 | 822.48 | ?1 225.02 | ?992.56 | N>Ca>S>K>P | 1 541.13 | |
| 4 | ?605.82 | 1 878.43 | ?4 040.28 | 2 353.16 | 414.52 | K>N>S>P>Ca | 1 858.44 | |
| 5 | ?3 744.24 | 448.67 | 1 774.94 | 853.84 | 666.78 | N>P>S>Ca>K | 1 497.69 | |
| 6 | ?369.11 | ?157.38 | ?322.02 | 548.12 | 300.39 | N>K>P>S>Ca | 339.41 | |
| 7 | ?2 840.19 | ?3 625.59 | 5 251.70 | ?3 086.56 | 4 300.64 | P>Ca>N>S>K | ||
| 8 | ?3 742.65 | ?7 962.98 | ?2 287.46 | ?4 484.92 | 18 478.01 | P>Ca>N>K>S | 7 391.20 | |
| 9 | 56.74 | 1 481.75 | 5 061.98 | ?5 363.72 | ?1 236.75 | Ca>S>N>P>K | 2 640.19 | |
| 平均值Average | ?1 349.19a | ?586.94a | 899.86ab | ?1 480.22a | 2 516.50a | — | 2 323.51a | |
| 标准差Standard deviation | 1 703.67 | 3 398.65 | 3 022.66 | 2 554.71 | 6 192.80 | — | 2 163.91 | |
| 负值频次Counts of negative values | 6 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 3 | — | — | |
| 低产园 Low-yield orchard | 1 | ?381.25 | ?934.66 | ?793.95 | 1 499.79 | 610.07 | P>K>N>S>Ca | 843.94 |
| 2 | ?1 479.99 | 4 756.40 | 5 444.70 | ?5 649.16 | ?3 071.96 | Ca>S>N>P>K | 4 080.44 | |
| 3 | ?1 922.30 | 5 038.76 | 8 351.35 | ?6 299.90 | ?5 167.91 | Ca>S>N>P>K | 5 356.04 | |
| 4 | 1 385.64 | ?1 030.76 | 1 851.58 | ?1 414.09 | ?792.37 | Ca>P>S>N>K | 1 294.89 | |
| 5 | ?4 524.10 | 1 424.78 | 1 183.99 | 2 960.24 | ?1 044.92 | N>S>K>P>Ca | 2 227.61 | |
| 平均值Average | ?1 384.40a | 1 850.90a | 3 207.54a | ?1 780.62a | ?1 893.42a | — | 2 760.58a | |
| 标准差Standard deviation | 2 170.00 | 2 951.67 | 3 654.07 | 4 146.10 | 2 253.39 | — | ||
| 负值频次Counts of negative values | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | — | — | |
表8
顶芽DRIS诊断指数及需肥顺序"
| 果园类型及编号 Orchard type and number | N | P | K | Ca | S | 需肥顺序 Order of nutrient requirement | 营养不平衡 指Nutritional imbalance index | |
| 高产园 High-yield orchard | 1 | 38.78 | ?34.63 | 69.36 | 127.65 | ?201.16 | S>P>N>K>Ca | 94.31 |
| 2 | –69.46 | 671.45 | ?2 235.22 | 2 344.51 | ?711.28 | K>S>N>P>Ca | 1 206.38 | |
| 3 | –829.58 | ?4 863.03 | ?818.85 | 5 311.93 | 1 199.53 | P>N>K>S>Ca | 2 604.58 | |
| 4 | 750.37 | 427.77 | ?3 914.54 | 2 766.73 | ?30.33 | K>S>P>N>Ca | 1 577.95 | |
| 5 | 291.28 | 150.25 | ?1 101.02 | ?259.16 | 918.65 | K>Ca>P>N>S | 544.07 | |
| 6 | ?560.55 | 1 447.36 | 1 121.96 | ?869.98 | ?1 138.78 | S>Ca>N>K>P | 1 027.72 | |
| 7 | ?1 712.19 | 305.18 | 866.54 | ?817.85 | 1 358.31 | N>Ca>P>K>S | 1 012.02 | |
| 8 | 2 586.85 | ?715.64 | ?1 883.84 | ?457.75 | 470.37 | K>P>Ca>S>N | 1 222.89 | |
| 9 | 2 110.18 | ?3 069.04 | 336.10 | 404.15 | 218.61 | P>S>K>Ca>N | 1 227.62 | |
| 10 | ?113.40 | ?314.76 | 869.61 | ?1 971.84 | 1 530.40 | Ca>P>N>K>S | 960.00 | |
| 11 | ?322.23 | ?1 023.77 | 1 487.19 | ?541.93 | 400.73 | P>Ca>N>S>K | 755.17 | |
| 12 | 1 223.95 | ?975.86 | ?619.74 | ?99.52 | 471.17 | P>K>Ca>S>N | 678.05 | |
| 13 | ?1 298.73 | 1 331.83 | 132.62 | ?282.38 | 116.66 | N>Ca>S>K>P | 632.44 | |
| 14 | 389.54 | 2 336.10 | 1 455.81 | ?2 252.25 | ?1 929.19 | Ca>S>N>K>P | 1 672.58 | |
| 15 | ?625.57 | 630.85 | 5 936.19 | ?1 405.64 | ?4 535.83 | S>Ca>N>P>K | 2 626.81 | |
| 16 | ?1 538.16 | ?2 138.81 | 703.36 | 2 776.27 | 197.33 | P>N>S>K>Ca | 1 470.79 | |
| 17 | ?1 244.29 | 1 582.40 | 1 320.91 | 1 197.28 | ?2 856.30 | S>N>Ca>K>P | 1 640.24 | |
| 18 | 797.46 | 920.37 | ?1 574.07 | ?1 322.16 | 1 178.39 | K>Ca>S>P>N | 1 158.49 | |
| 19 | ?658.29 | 615.83 | ?962.73 | ?1 987.12 | 2 992.31 | Ca>K>N>P>S | 1 443.26 | |
| 20 | 630.90 | 2 259.43 | ?799.40 | ?2 002.65 | ?88.28 | Ca>K>S>N>P | 1 156.13 | |
| 平均值Average | ?7.66a | ?22.84b | 19.51a | 32.91b | ?21.93a | — | 1 235.58b | |
| 标准差Standard deviation | 1 146.11 | 1 770.43 | 1 985.23 | 1 965.45 | 1 651.36 | — | 617.66 | |
| 负值频次Counts of negative values | 12 | 8 | 8 | 13 | 8 | — | — | |
| 中产园 Middle-yield orchard | 1 | 2 450.21 | 4 120.66 | ?366.29 | ?6 505.32 | 300.75 | Ca>K>S>N>P | 2 748.64 |
| 2 | ?89.97 | 3 136.03 | 4 141.11 | ?9 992.51 | 2 805.33 | Ca>N>S>P>K | 4 032.99 | |
| 3 | ?591.03 | 5 833.51 | 4 218.46 | ?7 762.27 | ?1 698.67 | Ca>S>N>K>P | 4 020.79 | |
| 4 | 864.30 | 5 819.54 | ?1 817.47 | ?5 135.72 | 269.35 | Ca>K>S>N>P | 2 781.28 | |
| 5 | 245.86 | 8 084.90 | ?2 537.55 | ?7 780.58 | 1 987.37 | Ca>K>N>S>P | 4 127.25 | |
| 6 | 135.59 | 5 644.21 | 1 376.06 | ?7 708.29 | 552.43 | Ca>N>S>K>P | 3 083.31 | |
| 7 | ?1 146.65 | 4 903.00 | ?3 769.59 | ?474.24 | 487.48 | K>N>Ca>S>P | 2 156.19 | |
| 8 | 795.68 | 583.96 | ?844.79 | ?61.87 | ?472.98 | K>S>Ca>P>N | 551.86 | |
| 9 | 733.01 | 1 129.86 | 1 659.14 | ?3 111.88 | ?410.13 | Ca>S>N>P>K | 1 408.80 | |
| 平均值Average | 377.44a | 4 361.74a | 228.79a | ?5 292.52c | 424.55a | — | 2 767.90a | |
| 标准差Standard deviation | 1 024.07 | 2 407.49 | 2 826.65 | 3 481.24 | 1 331.38 | — | ||
| 负值频次Counts of negative values | 3 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 3 | — | — | |
| 低产园 Low-yield orchard | 1 | ?1 257.02 | ?1 124.06 | 1 951.31 | 1 247.14 | ?817.38 | N>P>S>Ca>K | 1 279.38 |
| 2 | ?3 579.81 | ?3 515.42 | ?6 333.08 | 13 671.70 | ?243.39 | K>P>N>S>Ca | 5 468.68 | |
| 3 | ?3 414.78 | ?4 953.51 | ?3 004.26 | 12 828.59 | ?1 456.04 | P>N>K>S>Ca | 5 131.44 | |
| 4 | ?438.37 | ?1 390.81 | ?20.67 | 337.69 | ?1 487.84 | S>P>N>K>Ca | 1 335.08 | |
| 5 | ?2 376.03 | ?2 632.37 | 1 479.48 | 5 147.78 | ?1 618.86 | P>N>S>K>Ca | 2 650.90 | |
| 平均值Average | ?2 213.20b | ?2 723.23c | 3 467.85 | 7 246.58a | ?1 124.70a | — | 3 173.10a | |
| 标准差Standard deviation | 1 360.35 | 1 576.60 | 3 467.85 | 5 659.48 | 582.45 | — | 2 021.26 | |
| 负值频次Counts of negative values | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 5 | — | — | |
| 白 丽, 杨 璇, 李锐凯. 2025. 中国核桃出口增长驱动因素研究. 中国油脂, 50(7): 17, 26. | |
| Bai L, Yang X, Li R K. 2025. Research on driving factors of China walnut export growth. China Oils and Fats, 50(7): 17, 26. [in Chinese] | |
| 鲍士旦. 2019,. 土壤农化分析. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社. | |
| Bao S D. 2019,. Soil agricultural chemistry analysis. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Agriculture Press. [in Chinese] | |
|
陈德伟, 汤寓涵, 石文波, 等. 钙调控植物生长发育的进展分析. 分子植物育种, 2019, 17 (11): 3593- 3601.
doi: 10.13271/j.mpb.017.003593 |
|
|
Chen D W, Tang Y H, Shi W B, et al. Progress in the regulation of calcium growth and development. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2019, 17 (11): 3593- 3601.
doi: 10.13271/j.mpb.017.003593 |
|
| 范志懿, 刘佳嘉. 2020,. 果树叶片营养诊断方法研究进展. 山西农业科学, 48(12): 2017−2022,. | |
| Fan Z Y, Liu J J. 2020,. Research progress on nutritional diagnosis methods of fruit tree leaves, Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 48(12): 2017−2022,. [in Chinese] | |
|
冯大兰, 魏立本, 黄小辉, 等. 梁平柚果实膨大期叶片矿质营养诊断研究. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44 (2): 111- 116.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201902008 |
|
|
Feng D L, Wei L B, Huang X H, et al. Diagnostic study on mineral nutrition in leaves of Liangping pomelo during fruit expansion period. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2020, 44 (2): 111- 116.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201902008 |
|
| 国家林业和草原局. 2023,. 中国林业和草原统计年鉴(2022,). 北京: 中国林业出版社. | |
| National Forestry and Grassland Administration. 2023,. China forestry and grassland statistical yearbook (2022,). Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. [in Chinese] | |
| 国家林业和草原局. 2018,. 核桃标准综合体 (LY/T 3004—2018). 北京: 中国标准出版社. | |
| National Forestry and Grassland Administration. 2018,. Walnut complex standardization (LY/T 3004—2018). Beijing: Standards Press of China. [in Chinese] | |
| 国家质量技术监督局. 2009,. 南方地区耕地土壤肥力诊断与评价(NY/T1749—2009). 北京: 中国标准出版社. | |
| The State Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision. 2009,. Soil fertility diagnosis and evaluation method of farmland in southern China (NY/T1749—2009). Beijing: Standards Press of China. [in Chinese] | |
|
宫峥嵘, 王一峰, 王 翰, 等. 核桃矿质营养研究进展. 林业科学, 2021, 51 (1): 178- 190.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210119 |
|
|
Gong Z R, Wang Y F, Wang H, et al. Research progress on mineral nutrition of walnut. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 51 (1): 178- 190.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210119 |
|
|
胡建文, 王庆成, 马双娇. 人工林精准施肥研究进展. 世界林业研究, 2020, 33 (4): 37- 42.
doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2019.0125.y |
|
|
Hu J W, Wang Q C, Ma S J. Research advances in precision fertilization regime for plantation forests. World Forestry Research, 2020, 33 (4): 37- 42.
doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2019.0125.y |
|
|
黄小辉, 冯大兰, 杨华均, 等. 不同施肥处理对‘渝城1号’核桃产量、品质和土壤肥力的影响. 东北林业大学学报, 2024, 52 (3): 97- 102, 140.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2024.03.014 |
|
|
Huang X H, Feng D L, Yang H J, et al. Effects of different fertilization treatments on the yield, quality and soil fertility of ‘Yucheng 1’ Juglans regia L. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2024, 52 (3): 97- 102, 140.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2024.03.014 |
|
|
李青军, 耿庆龙, 赖 宁, 等. 核桃土壤养分评价及其与核桃产量的相关性分析. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56 (5): 826- 833.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.05.005 |
|
|
Li Q J, Geng Q L, Lai N, et al. Evaluation of walnut soil nutrients and the correlation with its yield. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56 (5): 826- 833.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.05.005 |
|
| 刘茂桥. 2016,. 贵州核桃主产区核桃园土壤与叶片养分状况及其评价. 贵阳: 贵州大学. | |
| Liu M Q. 2016,. Soil and leaf nutrient status and its evaluation of walnut orchards in the major producing areas of Guizhou. Guiyang: Guizhou University. [in Chinese] | |
| 毛文静. 2023,. 配施肥对核桃园土壤质量、叶片养分及产量品质的影响. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学. | |
| Mao W J. 2023,. Effects of fertilization on soil quality, leaf nutrients and yield quality in walnut orchards. Yangling: Northwest A&F University. [in Chinese] | |
|
苗庆选, 郭 满, 马海林, 等. 不同生态区核桃林地肥水管理及土壤肥力差异研究. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021 (1): 296- 302.
doi: 10.11838/sfsc.1673-6257.19588 |
|
|
Miao Q X, Guo M, Ma H L, et al. Study on the variation of fertilizer and water management and soil fertility of walnut woodland in different ecological regions. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2021 (1): 296- 302.
doi: 10.11838/sfsc.1673-6257.19588 |
|
|
濮阳雪华, 苟清平, 王春春, 等. 陕北黄土区不同微地形土壤养分特征研究. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34 (3): 37- 42, 73.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2019.03.06 |
|
|
Puyang X H, Gou Q P, Wang C C, et al. Characteristics of soil nutrients in different micro-topography in loess region of northern Shaanxi Province. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2019, 34 (3): 37- 42, 73.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2019.03.06 |
|
|
蒲成伟, 廖前超, 张 绩, 等. 南充市不同类型土壤理化性质比较研究. 土壤通报, 2025, 56 (1): 74- 86.
doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2023112301 |
|
|
Pu C W, Liao Q C, Zhang J, et al. Comparative study on physical and chemical properties of different types of soils in Nanchong. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2025, 56 (1): 74- 86.
doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2023112301 |
|
|
孙 妍, 张泽宇, 王 芳, 等. “辽宁1号”核桃叶片和种仁营养成分与土壤营养的关系. 林业与生态科学, 2023, 38 (4): 411- 417.
doi: 10.13320/j.cnki.hjfor.2023.0051 |
|
|
Sun Y, Zhang Z Y, Wang F, et al. Relationship between nutrient composition of leaves and kernels of “Liaoning No. 1” Juglans regia and soil nutrition. Forestry and Ecological Sciences, 2023, 38 (4): 411- 417.
doi: 10.13320/j.cnki.hjfor.2023.0051 |
|
|
檀龙颜, 马洪娜. 植物响应钙离子胁迫的研究进展. 植物生理学报, 2017, 53 (7): 1150- 1158.
doi: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2017.0036 |
|
|
Tan L Y, Ma H N. Advance in the research of plant in response to calcium ions stress. Plant Physiology Journal, 2017, 53 (7): 1150- 1158.
doi: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2017.0036 |
|
|
王 芳, 冯启科, 孙 妍, 等. 不同施肥处理对核桃园土壤矿质元素与产量的影响. 中国果树, 2022 (12): 43- 47, 56.
doi: 10.16626/j.cnki.issn1000-8047.2022.12.008 |
|
|
Wang F, Feng Q K, Sun Y, et al. Effects of different fertilizer treatments on soil mineral elements and yield in walnut orchard. China Fruits, 2022 (12): 43- 47, 56.
doi: 10.16626/j.cnki.issn1000-8047.2022.12.008 |
|
| 温延臣, 李燕青, 袁 亮, 等. 长期不同施肥制度土壤肥力特征综合评价方法. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31 (7): 91- 99. | |
| Wen Y C, Li Y Q, Yuan L, et al. Comprehensive assessment methodology of characteristics of soil fertility under different fertilization regimes in north China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31 (7): 91- 99. | |
| 张 静, 张兆彤, 殷子月, 等. 我国核桃主产区果实氮磷钾养分吸收阈值研究. 中国土壤与肥料, 2023 (5): 231- 239. | |
| Zhang J, Zhang Z T, Yin Z Y, et al. Study on the absorption threshold of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in walnut fruits in China. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2023 (5): 231- 239. | |
| 张 齐, 同延安, 杜春燕, 等. 陕西省商洛核桃产区施肥现状评价. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24 (2): 479- 488. | |
| Zhang Q, Tong Y A, Du C Y, et al. Evaluation of current fertilization status in walnut orchards of Shangluo District, Shaanxi Province. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizes, 2018, 24 (2): 479- 488. | |
|
张 荣, 陶 亮. 中国核桃生产和贸易现状分析. 中国果树, 2025 (1): 147- 152.
doi: 10.16626/j.cnki.issn1000-8047.2025.01.022 |
|
|
Zhang R, Tao L. Analysis of the production and trade status of walnut in China. China Fruits, 2025 (1): 147- 152.
doi: 10.16626/j.cnki.issn1000-8047.2025.01.022 |
|
| 张志华, 裴 东. 2018,. 核桃学. 北京: 中国农业出版社. | |
| Zhang Z H, Pei D. 2018,. Walnut science. Beijing: China Agriculture Press. [in Chinese] | |
|
赵瑞芬, 程 滨, 滑小赞, 等. 基于主成分分析的山西省核桃主产区土壤肥力评价. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 40 (6): 61- 68.
doi: 10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.202004043 |
|
|
Zhao R F, Cheng B, Hua X Z, et al. Evaluation of soil fertility status in main walnut production areas in Shanxi based on principal component analysis. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 40 (6): 61- 68.
doi: 10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.202004043 |
|
|
Fukasawa R, Miyazawa T, Abe C, et al. Functional components of walnuts: a review focusing on native and cultivated species. Food Science and Technology Research, 2024, 30 (1): 1- 12.
doi: 10.3136/fstr.FSTR-D-23-00093 |
|
|
Kiryushin V I. Assessment of land quality and soil fertility for planning farming systems and agrotechnologies. Eurasian Soil Science, 2017, 40 (7): 785- 791.
doi: 10.1134/S1064229307070113 |
|
|
Lambers H. Phosphorus acquisition and utilization in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2022, 73, 17- 42.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-102720-125738 |
|
|
Liu M, Li C C, Xu X L, et al. Organic and inorganic nitrogen uptake by 21 dominant tree species in temperate and tropical forests. Tree Physiology, 2017, 37 (11): 1515- 1526.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx046 |
|
| Torres-Olivar V, Villegas-Torres O G, Domínguez-Patiño M L, et al. Role of nitrogen and nutrients in crop nutrition. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology B, 2014, 4, 29- 37. | |
| Toyota M, Furuichi T, Tatsumi H, et al. Critical consideration on the relationship between auxin transport and calcium transients in gravity perception of Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 2008, 3 (8): 521- 524. | |
| Yin L L, Qing T, Zhang S X, et al. Determination of trace elements in edible nuts in the Beijing market by ICP-MS. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2015, 28 (6): 449- 454. |
| [1] | 崔王斌,周宏平,张洋,王艳艳,许林云,范高鸣. 基于点云建模的核桃树振动参数优化与试验[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(2): 186-203. |
| [2] | 白永超,王卫雄,李宝鑫,杨静雅,王祺,周荣飞,牛犇,裴东. 新疆核桃焦叶症发生规律及其影响因子[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(3): 169-181. |
| [3] | 李琰,孙永江,齐建勋,史玉洁,宋健,陈永浩,翟长远,张俊佩,侯智霞,张赟齐. 核桃枝叶固废高效腐熟的菌剂筛选及堆肥过程变化[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(11): 102-115. |
| [4] | 罗红,普布顿珠,刘宏伟,嘎玛群宗,吴建普,韦红莉. 西藏“一江两河”中部流域人工造林对土壤养分和肥力的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(4): 71-78. |
| [5] | 姬新颖, 唐佳莉, 李敖, 郑旭, 王红霞, 张俊佩. 盐胁迫下不同基因型核桃实生幼苗生长及生理响应[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(2): 65-77. |
| [6] | 王茹,罗莎莎,王如月,杨梦思,孙雅丽,虎海防,张萍. 不同生长时期核桃叶片中挥发性有机物的GC-IMS分析[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(6): 57-73. |
| [7] | 苑轲,黄坚钦,王克涛,夏国华,张启香,徐川梅. 山核桃寡核苷酸探针开发及其应用[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(5): 88-99. |
| [8] | 曹明奡,张菲,黄光明,刘瑞成,刘利平,吴强盛,徐永杰. 丛枝菌根真菌对低磷胁迫下核桃幼苗根系磷吸收的影响及机制[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(12): 117-124. |
| [9] | 牛耕耘,肖炜,魏美才. 巨棒蜂属(膜翅目: 棒蜂科)一新种暨巨棒蜂属亚洲种类检索表[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(5): 160-164. |
| [10] | 陈新,王敏,傅茂润,王贵芳,相昆,刘庆忠,焦文晓,张美勇,许海峰. 核桃炭疽病发生相关的酚类物质代谢分析[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(10): 71-80. |
| [11] | 宫峥嵘,王一峰,王瀚,李唯,耿明建,张文明,刘露. 核桃矿质营养研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(1): 178-190. |
| [12] | 孙晓丹,叶钰倩,王刚,关庆伟. 有机物覆盖的土壤环境效应作用机制研究现状与展望[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(6): 103-112. |
| [13] | 王林,代永欣,张劲松,孟平,孙胜,李豪,万贤崇. 水分和光照条件对核桃-黄豆农林复合系统中黄豆光合作用和生长的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(4): 188-196. |
| [14] | 任飞,张佳琦,胡恒康,梁璧,黄有军,娄和强,张启香. 红色荧光蛋白基因DsRED在核桃植株再生过程中的表达稳定性[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(12): 166-176. |
| [15] | 梁璧,张佳琦,任飞,胡恒康,徐川梅,胡渊渊,黄有军,娄和强,张启香. 山核桃贝壳杉烯氧化酶基因CcKO的克隆和表达分析[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(10): 70-82. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||