基于表型及功能成分的果用银杏优良栽培品系综合评价

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20250492

林业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (3): 161-170.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20250492

基于表型及功能成分的果用银杏优良栽培品系综合评价

王语^1,²,汪贵斌^1,^2,*(),张源辉^1,²,杨玉霞^1,²,唐玮^1,²,国靖^1,²,刘玉华³,余鹏飞⁴

1. 林木遗传育种全国重点实验室　南方现代林业协同创新中心　南京林业大学　南京 210037
2. 江苏省农业种质资源保护与利用平台　南京 210014
3. 江苏农林职业技术学院现代林业技术创新研究院　句容 212499
4. 睢宁县润企投资有限公司　睢宁 221200

收稿日期:2025-08-05 修回日期:2025-10-21 出版日期:2026-03-15 发布日期:2026-03-12
通讯作者: 汪贵斌 E-mail:gbwang@njfu.com.cn
基金资助:
林木遗传育种国家重点实验室自主研究课题（SKLTGB-NJ2024-005）；江苏省高等学校优势学科建设项目（PAPD）。

Comprehensive Evaluation of Superior Ginkgo biloba Cultivars for Fruit Production Based on Phenotype and Functional Components

Yu Wang^1,²,Guibin Wang^1,^2,*(),Yuanhui Zhang^1,²,Yuxia Yang^1,²,Wei Tang^1,²,Jing Guo^1,²,Yuhua Liu³,Pengfei Yu⁴

1. State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding　Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China　Nanjing Forestry University　Nanjing 210037
2. Jiangsu Provincial Platform for Conservation and Utilazation of Agricultural Germplasm　Nanjing 210014
3. School of Landscape Architecture, Jiangsu Vocational College of Agriculture and Forestry　Jurong 212499
4. Suining Runqi Investment Co., Ltd.　Suining 221200

Received:2025-08-05 Revised:2025-10-21 Online:2026-03-15 Published:2026-03-12
Contact: Guibin Wang E-mail:gbwang@njfu.com.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 探究银杏种仁主要药用成分（黄酮和内酯）在发育过程中的动态积累规律，分析不同栽培品系间表型性状、种仁营养成分、药用成分和致敏性成分差异，筛选药用成分含量高、综合品质优良的银杏果用栽培品系。方法: 选取4个丰产品系，动态测定种仁发育过程中的药用成分含量变化，并于成熟期系统测定36个栽培品系的种核表型特征、种仁营养成分、药用成分和致敏性成分含量，综合应用变异系数分析、多样性指数分析、相关性分析、主成分分析和模糊隶属函数法，评价各品系优劣，筛选目标品系。结果: 银杏种仁总黄酮和总内酯含量在发育期均呈先升高后降低的变化趋势，峰值分别出现在7月或9月，10月成熟期最低。36个供试品系表型性状变异系数为10.46%~36.88%，多样性指数为3.54~3.58，化学成分变异系数为9.91%~36.93%，多样性指数范围为3.52~3.58。相关性分析显示，淀粉含量与银杏酸含量呈极显著负相关（P < 0.01），与总黄酮含量呈显著负相关（P < 0.05）；药用成分（黄酮和内酯）与形态指标（核形系数和核宽、核厚、单核质量）均呈显著负相关（P < 0.05）。基于主成分分析和模糊隶属函数法构建综合评价模型，筛选出25和33号2个药用成分含量显著较高的果用品系，总黄酮含量均值为2.32 mg·g^–1，总内酯含量均值为3.66 mg·g^–1。结论: 本研究阐明银杏种仁药用成分在发育过程中呈先升高后降低的动态积累规律，证实银杏栽培品系在表型性状、营养成分、药用成分等方面表现较高的变异系数，且各性状间存在显著相关性；综合评价出25和33号2个优良栽培品系，尤其是25号药用成分含量突出，且致敏成分相对较低，表现出优异的综合品质，可为“高药用、低致敏”银杏果用良种的定向选育、功能型食品开发及产业化推广提供材料基础。

关键词: 银杏, 优良品系选育, 药用成分, 致敏成分, 综合评价

Abstract:

Objective: This study aims to investigate the dynamic accumulation patterns of the main medicinal components (flavonoids and terpene lactones) in the seed kernel of Ginkgo biloba during development, to analyze the phenotypic traits, seed kernel nutrients, medicinal components, and allergenic components among different cultivars, so as to screen ginkgo fruit cultivars with high medicinal content and superior overall quality. Method: Four productive cultivars were selected to dynamically determine the changes in the content of medicinal components during development of the seed kernel. At maturity, the phenotypic characteristics of the nuts and the nutritional, medicinal, and allergenic components of the kernels in 36 cultivars were systematically determined. The coefficient of variation analysis, diversity index analysis, correlation analysis, principal component analysis, and fuzzy subordinate function method were comprehensively applied to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each cultivar and to screen the target cultivars. Result: The total flavonoid and total lactone contents in ginkgo seed kernels exhibited a development pattern of first increasing and then decreasing with the peaks occurring in July or September and the lowest in October during the maturation period. The coefficients of variation of the phenotypic traits across the 36 tested cultivars ranged from 10.46% to 36.88%, with diversity indices ranging from 3.54 to 3.58, while the coefficients of variation of the chemical composition ranged from 9.91% to 36.93%, with diversity indices ranging from 3.52 to 3.58. Correlation analyses revealed that starch content was highly significantly negatively correlated with ginkgolic acid content (P<0.01) and significantly negatively correlated with total flavonoid content (P<0.05). Medicinal constituents (flavonoids and terpene lactones) were significantly negatively correlated with the morphological indexes (nut shape coefficients and nut widths, nut thicknesses, and single nut weights) (P<0.05). Based on principal component analysis and the fuzzy subordinate function method, a comprehensive evaluation model was constructed for screening out two fruit cultivars (No. 25 and No. 33) with significantly higher medicinal content. The two cultivars exhibited an average total flavonoid content of 2.32 mg·g^–1, and an average total lactone content of 3.66 mg·g^–1. Conclusion: This research has systematically elucidated the dynamic accumulation pattern of medicinal components in ginkgo seed kernels, which exhibit an first increasing and then decreasing during development. It is confirmed that cultivated ginkgo cultivars exhibit high coefficients of variation in phenotypic traits, nutritional components, and medicinal constituents, and there are significant correlations between these traits. Two superior cultivars, No. 25 and No. 33, have been comprehensively evaluated. Especially, cultivar No. 25 has outstanding medicinal component content with relatively low allergenic components, demonstrating excellent comprehensive quality. The findings provide a material foundation for the targeted breeding of “high-medicinal, low-allergenic” ginkgo cultivars, and for the development of functional foods and industrial promotion.

Key words: Ginkgo biloba, breeding of superior cultivars, medicinal components, allergenic components, comprehensive evaluation

中图分类号:

S792.95

王语,汪贵斌,张源辉,杨玉霞,唐玮,国靖,刘玉华,余鹏飞. 基于表型及功能成分的果用银杏优良栽培品系综合评价[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(3): 161-170.

Yu Wang,Guibin Wang,Yuanhui Zhang,Yuxia Yang,Wei Tang,Jing Guo,Yuhua Liu,Pengfei Yu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Superior Ginkgo biloba Cultivars for Fruit Production Based on Phenotype and Functional Components[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2026, 62(3): 161-170.

图/表 8

表1

图1

表2

银杏各品系种核表型性状（均值±标准误差）①"

栽培品系编号 Cultivar number	种核长 NL/ mm	种核宽 NW/ mm	种核厚 NT/ mm	单核质量 SNW/ g	核形系数 NSC
1	17.64±2.04 o	12.31±0.72 i–m	10.33±0.68 k–o	1.07±0.25 j	1.43±0.13 jkl
2	20.53±2.76 ijk	11.60±2.21 lm	11.31±0.73 fgh	1.70±0.27 fg	1.79±0.14 a
3	21.97±0.94 d–g	15.15±0.59 bcd	12.29±0.47 cd	1.86±0.22 ef	1.45±0.03 i–l
4	17.69±2.34 o	11.52±2.25 m	9.47±1.38 pq	0.99±0.49 j	1.56±0.14 c–f
5	19.41±2.19 k–n	12.72±2.14 h–k	10.05±1.34 nop	1.20±0.50 j	1.54±0.11 def
6	24.52±1.24 a	15.62±0.62 b	13.12±0.38 b	2.30±0.28 ab	1.57±0.07 cde
7	21.22±2.45 f–i	12.01±1.24 klm	10.38±0.27 k–o	1.18±0.31 j	1.77±0.10 a
8	16.29±2.47 p	10.44±0.99 n	9.09±0.63 q	0.60±0.30 k	1.56±0.17 cde
9	20.91±2.59 g–j	13.04±1.80 ghi	11.15±0.55 ghi	1.45±0.48 hi	1.61±0.08±c
10	19.07±2.54 mn	12.81±2.87 g–k	10.97±0.49 h–k	1.53±0.30 ghi	1.52±0.17 e–h
11	22.59±2.16 b–e	15.53±0.87 b	12.81±0.60 bc	2.08±0.37 cde	1.45±0.09 i–l
12	22.98±0.71 b–e	15.74±0.65 b	12.39±0.28 cd	2.17±0.18 bc	1.46±0.07 h–l
13	22.23±1.25 def	15.15±0.98 bcd	11.97±0.36 de	2.07±0.37 cde	1.47±0.07 h–l
14	22.77±0.67 b–e	15.61±0.54 b	12.23±0.32 cd	2.01±0.16 cde	1.46±0.03 i–l
15	22.61±0.99 b–e	15.25±0.73 bc	12.13±0.52 cd	1.98±0.29 cde	1.48±0.03 g–k
16	17.89±2.22 o	13.13±1.30 ghi	10.60±0.83 i–n	1.22±0.39 j	1.37±0.10 mn
17	19.26±1.66 lmn	13.62±1.16 fg	10.90±0.52 h–l	1.45±0.27 hi	1.42±0.09 klm
18	20.86±2.24 hij	14.08±1.57 ef	11.05±0.82 hij	1.63±0.49 ghi	1.48±0.07 g–j
19	20.49±1.34 ijk	14.56±2.33 cde	12.73±1.52 bc	1.93±0.70 de	1.43±0.20 jkl
20	22.38±0.63 cde	12.93±0.72 g–j	11.10±0.48 g–j	1.58±0.24 ghi	1.74±0.08 ab
21	22.64±1.49 b–e	14.64±1.21 cde	11.74±0.31 d–g	1.96±0.26 cde	1.55±0.13 c–f
22	23.07±1.96 bcd	14.33±1.36 def	12.18±0.96 cd	1.95±0.41 cde	1.61±0.09 c
23	19.19±1.82 lmn	12.15±1.39 j–m	10.78±0.60 h–m	1.19±0.35 j	1.58±0.09 cd
24	20.32±3.99 i–l	14.04±2.81 ef	10.26±0.41 l–o	1.69±0.94 fg	1.45±0.05 i–l
25	21.94±3.77 d–h	15.55±2.48 b	12.19±1.56 cd	2.11±0.81 bcd	1.41±0.08 lm
26	19.44±2.45 k–n	14.60±1.74 cde	12.68±0.63 bc	1.69±0.53 fg	1.33±0.03 n
27	21.84±0.50 e–h	17.65±0.64 a	13.96±0.48 a	2.46±0.14 a	1.24±0.05 o
28	23.57±0.73 ab	15.74±0.63 b	12.67±0.24 bc	2.13±0.19 bcd	1.50±0.04 f–i
29	18.68±1.68 no	11.76±0.81 lm	9.79±0.63 op	1.10±0.23 j	1.58±0.07 cde
30	22.33±0.98 de	12.97±2.07 g–j	11.05±1.05 hij	1.44±0.17 i	1.77±0.11 a
31	19.05±1.11 mn	12.44±0.80 i–l	10.46±0.27 j–n	1.19±0.19 j	1.53±0.04 d–g
32	16.29±0.72 p	10.53±0.92 n	9.03±0.54 q	0.64±0.24 k	1.56±0.09 c–f
33	20.04±1.80 j–m	13.55±1.58 fgh	11.22±1.01 f–i	1.53±0.46 ghi	1.48±0.06 g–j
34	20.18±0.93 i–m	14.12±1.55 ef	11.84±0.96 def	1.60±0.28 ghi	1.46±0.21 i–l
35	23.50±1.68 abc	13.17±1.03 ghi	11.37±0.92 e–h	1.68±0.41 fgh	1.79±0.07 a
36	19.92±0.76 j–m	11.67±0.37 lm	10.19±0.22 mno	1.14±0.09 j	1.71±0.07 b
平均值Mean	20.70±2.79	13.66±2.21	11.30±1.35	1.60±0.59	1.53±0.16
变异系数CV (%)	13.48	16.18	11.95	36.88	10.46
F值F value	35.72^**	39.54^**	31.40^**	40.30^**	48.54^**
多样性系数H′	3.58	3.58	3.58	3.54	3.58

表2

表3

银杏各品系种仁主要化学成分（均值±标准误差）①"

栽培品系编号 Cultivar number	可溶性蛋白 SP/ (mg·g^–1)	可溶性糖 SS/ (mg·g^–1)	淀粉 S/ (mg·g^–1)	总黄酮 TF/ (mg·g^–1)	总内酯 TP/ (mg·g^–1)	银杏酸 GA/ (μg·g^–1)	4’-O-甲基吡哆醇 MPN/ (μg·g^–1)
1	6.15±0.35 c–f	58.74±1.46 kl	427.86±0.73 w	2.32±0.08 abc	2.76±0.21 ij	25.11±0.77 d	282.63±5.21 i
2	5.37±0.10 e–j	54.90±0.78 nop	624.81±0.64 c	1.94±0.17 fg	2.99±0.19 f–i	21.54±1.07 fg	145.53±13.21 o
3	6.15±0.36 c–f	58.74±0.29 kl	527.41±1.98 mn	2.05±0.04 def	2.94±0.09 ghi	20.67±0.77 gh	321.19±2.72 efg
4	6.36±1.01 b–e	51.82±0.91 qr	428.97±0.58 w	2.12±0.08 b–f	3.41±0.06 bcd	20.24±0.26 h	336.40±16.25 d
5	7.28±1.35 bc	56.76±0.11 mn	568.86±1.18 h	2.11±0.02 b–f	3.15±0.18 d–g	19.88±0.63 h	259.25±3.11 jk
6	5.72±0.40 d–i	58.32±0.33 lm	514.93±1.58 p	2.08±0.03 b–f	3.10±0.08 e–h	20.30±0.22 h	236.63±6.24 l
7	6.53±0.68 b–e	70.86±1.35 c	511.00±1.21 q	1.95±0.06 fg	2.77±0.12 ij	23.29±0.16 e	253.99±3.15 k
8	7.20±1.20 bc	53.29±0.80 pq	488.53±1.84 r	2.19±0.08 b–f	3.66±0.09 ab	24.75±0.38 d	358.92±4.48 c
9	4.10±0.43 jkl	49.19±1.45 st	522.13±1.92 o	2.05±0.11 def	2.77±0.36 ij	27.78±1.18 c	305.93±5.34 h
10	4.41±0.29 i–l	48.53±0.33 st	525.56±0.47 n	2.17±0.03 b–f	3.00±0.03 f–i	23.00±0.30 e	350.42±0.93 c
11	3.55±0.55 kl	51.63±0.91 qr	517.59±0.79 p	2.28±0.06 a–d	2.73±0.26 ij	22.39±0.93 ef	269.53±6.69 j
12	3.32±0.23 l	51.88±1.02 qr	545.23±1.44 l	2.19±0.12 b–f	2.91±0.06 ghi	22.64±0.87 ef	259.76±2.83 jk
13	4.86±0.05 f–k	60.46±1.03 ijk	564.37±0.65 i	2.25±0.04 a–d	2.71±0.19 ij	25.48±0.73 d	333.37±7.91 de
14	3.94±0.82 kl	63.57±1.12 fgh	543.68±1.56 l	2.24±0.08 a–d	2.83±0.05 hij	24.95±0.53 d	324.77±5.00 def
15	5.75±0.57 d–i	61.61±0.97 i	403.87±1.29 x	2.13±0.06 b–f	2.32±0.20 k	30.19±1.27 b	287.68±4.04 i
16	7.49±0.90 b	59.46±1.57 jkl	387.93±1.69 y	2.29±0.02 a–d	2.90±0.04 ghi	28.61±1.34 c	135.27±6.10 o
17	6.95±1.53 bcd	51.18±0.91 r	441.09±1.37 v	2.32±0.05 abc	2.56±0.18 jk	32.26±1.32 a	72.30±1.09 p
18	4.43±0.80 i–l	60.61±0.27 ijk	543.13±1.55 l	2.34±0.04 ab	2.93±0.15 ghi	11.90±0.59 mn	249.22±8.13 kl
19	4.07±0.32 jkl	60.94±0.89 ij	554.18±0.22 k	2.11±0.21 b–f	2.95±0.13 ghi	11.51±0.62 mno	326.76±22.55 def
20	5.31±0.35 e–j	55.33±1.39 no	508.59±0.55 q	1.64±0.21 h	2.78±0.06 ij	10.66±0.85 nop	318.84±4.33 fgh
21	4.45±0.11 h–l	54.33±0.46 op	474.02±1.63 t	2.17±0.26 b–f	2.91±0.05 ghi	12.17±0.89 lm	202.51±10.35 m
22	5.36±0.42 e–j	50.32±0.76 rs	477.58±1.34 s	2.31±0.32 a–d	2.84±0.04 hij	9.68±0.99 p	160.77±11.89 n
23	6.48±0.39 b–e	54.39±0.73 op	475.38±2.04 st	2.15±0.08 b–f	2.94±0.20 ghi	10.33±0.76 op	376.34±2.76 b
24	5.97±1.01 c–g	55.60±0.44 no	529.45±1.26 m	2.10±0.14 b–f	2.75±0.09 ij	12.52±0.68 klm	316.89±7.51 fgh
25	4.55±1.01 h–l	62.15±1.13 ghi	556.90±5.31 k	2.45±0.20 a	3.51±0.06 bc	13.62±0.83 jk	251.70±14.48 k
26	5.73±0.68 d–i	61.75±0.84 hi	681.51±1.48 a	1.80±0.13 gh	2.59±0.08 j	15.77±0.96 i	76.17±2.51 p
27	4.19±0.39 jkl	53.97±0.91 op	625.52±1.83 c	2.07±0.12 c–f	2.81±0.09 hij	14.66±1.38 ij	317.18±7.43 fgh
28	3.51±0.25 kl	57.85±0.41 lm	590.36±1.89 e	1.97±0.21 efg	2.75±0.07 ij	11.69±1.14 mn	336.99±6.56 d
29	3.95±0.44 kl	51.57±0.99 gr	575.78±2.22 g	2.23±0.07 a–e	3.24±0.21 def	12.28±0.49 lm	352.81±2.88 c
30	4.09±0.71 jkl	75.70±0.59 b	644.88±1.97 b	1.70±0.10 h	2.99±0.16 f–i	11.83±0.41 mn	145.99±2.81 o
31	4.81±0.06 f–k	90.09±1.00 a	601.00±0.14 d	2.24±0.30 a–d	2.96±0.06 f–i	9.44±0.21 p	377.30±4.96 b
32	8.96±2.07 a	47.47±0.93 t	582.89±2.83 f	1.68±0.03 h	2.99±0.11 f–i	10.60±0.38 nop	524.03±5.86 a
33	5.56±0.28 e–i	63.85±0.99 fg	624.79±2.51 c	2.18±0.03 b–f	3.80±0.07 a	11.31±0.49 mno	362.02±4.62 c
34	5.80±0.32 d–h	68.35±1.07 d	560.04±1.71 j	2.09±0.10 b–f	3.31±0.08 cde	11.85±0.41 mn	355.03±2.45 c
35	4.69±0.89 g–k	66.40±1.20 e	449.06±0.97 u	2.18±0.08 b–f	3.52±0.22 bc	13.22±0.41 kl	309.95±7.56 gh
36	4.67±0.84 g–l	65.38±0.63 ef	543.27±2.93 l	2.12±0.06 b–f	3.63±0.28 ab	15.88±0.42 i	331.10±3.49 def
平均值Mean	5.31±1.43	58.81±8.38	531.71±68.13	2.12±0.21	2.99±0.35	18.14±6.70	284.03±91.53
变异系数CV (%)	26.93	14.25	12.81	9.91	11.71	36.93	32.23
F值F value	10.67^**	244.82^**	4416.33^**	5.93^**	14.54^**	265.06^**	423.28^**
多样性系数H′	3.56	3.57	3.58	3.58	3.58	3.52	3.53

表3

图2

表4

表5

表6

参考文献 0

	白鑫磊, 金　华, 邹吉祥, 等. 文冠果表型性状的相关性及主成分分析. 经济林研究, 2019, 37 (1): 68- 73. doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2019.01.010
	Bai X L, Jin H, Zou J X, et al. Correlation analysis and principal component analysis on phenotypic characteristics in Xanthoceras sorbifolia. Nonwood Forest Research, 2019, 37 (1): 68- 73. doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2019.01.010
	曹福亮. 2007. 中国银杏志. 北京: 中国林业出版社.
	Cao F L. 2007. Journal of Ginkgo biloba in China. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. ［in Chinese］
	曹福亮. 2011. 中国银杏品种图鉴. 北京: 科学出版社.
	Cao F L. 2011. An illustrated monograph of Ginkgo biloba L. cultivars in China. Beijing: Science Press. ［in Chinese］
	陈柏林, 邹敏敏, 苏二正, 等. 银杏果食药物质基础及其加工利用现状. 生物加工过程, 2020, 18 (6): 758- 765, 774. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3678.2020.06.011
	Chen B L, Zou M M, Su E Z, et al. Processing and utilization of edible and medicinal components of Ginkgo biloba seeds: a review. Chinese Journal of Bioprocess Engineering, 2020, 18 (6): 758- 765, 774. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3678.2020.06.011
	国家药典委员会. 2020. 中华人民共和国药典. 四部. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社.
	National Pharmacopoeia Commission. 2020. Chinese pharmacopoeia. part Ⅳ. Beijing: China Medical Science Press. ［in Chinese］
	郭　远, 杨　柳, 王园清, 等. 大豆种子发育过程中异黄酮含量的动态分析. 农学学报, 2012, 2 (11): 1- 5, 36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7774.2012.11.001
	Guo Y, Yang L, Wang Y Q, et al. The dynamic analysis of isoflavone during seed development in soybean. Journal of Agriculture, 2012, 2 (11): 1- 5, 36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7774.2012.11.001
	蓝丽霞, 徐展宏, 孙操稳, 等. 青钱柳种质资源评价及其优良家系和单株筛选. 林业科学研究, 2022, 35 (5): 42- 51. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2022.005.005
	Lan L X, Xu Z H, Sun C W, et al. Evaluation on germplasm resources of Cyclocarya paliurus and its oriented selection of superior families and trees. Forest Research, 2022, 35 (5): 42- 51. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2022.005.005
	王学奎, 黄见良. 2015. 植物生理生化实验原理与技术. 北京: 高等教育出版社.
	Wang X K, Huang J L. 2015. Principles and techniques of plant physiology and biochemistry experiments. Beijing: Higher Education Press. ［in Chinese］
	吴春文. 2022. 银杏种质资源遗传多样性分析及核心种质的构建. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学.
	Wu C W. 2022. Analysis of genetic diversity and construction of core collection in germplasm resources of ginkgo. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry and Technology. ［in Chinese］
	徐玉金, 李　翔, 李　岩, 等. 红松种实性状及营养成分动态变化分析. 北京林业大学学报, 2024, 46 (7): 67- 76. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220148
	Xu Y J, Li X, Li Y, et al. Dynamic changes in seed, cone traits and nutritional components of Pinus koraiensis. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46 (7): 67- 76. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20220148
	郁万文, 罗天宇, 曹福亮, 等. 不同品种和树龄银杏叶聚戊烯醇含量的年动态特征. 经济林研究, 2019, 37 (2): 1- 6.
	Yu W W, Luo T Y, Cao F L, et al. Annual dynamic characteristics of polyprenol contents in leaves of different varieties of Ginkgo biloba at different tree ages. Nonwood Forest Research, 2019, 37 (2): 1- 6.
	张　恒, 袁　汕, 傅志强, 等. 广宁红花油茶优树综合评价及指标筛选. 浙江农林大学学报, 2023, 40 (2): 374- 381. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220376
	Zhang H, Yuan S, Fu Z Q, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and index screening of excellent plants of Camellia semiserrata. Journal of Zhejiang A& F University, 2023, 40 (2): 374- 381. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220376
	张　毅, 敖　妍, 刘觉非, 等. 2019. 文冠果种实性状变异规律及优良单株选择. 东北林业大学学报, 47(9): 1−5.
	Zhang Y, Ao Y, Liu J F, et al. 2019. Variation pattern of fruit and seed characters and superior individual selection of Xanthoceras sorbifolium. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 47(9): 1−5. ［in Chinese］
	赵东亚, 唐进根, 陈利红, 等. 银杏外种皮提取银杏酸工艺的优化试验. 林业科技开发, 2012, 26 (5): 79- 82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2012.05.020
	Zhao D Y, Tang J G, Chen L H, et al. Optimization of the extraction process in Ginkgo biloba exocarp. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2012, 26 (5): 79- 82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2012.05.020
	Boateng I D. A critical review of current technologies used to reduce ginkgotoxin, ginkgotoxin-5′-glucoside, ginkgolic acid, allergic glycoprotein, and cyanide in Ginkgo biloba L. seed. Food Chemistry, 2022, 382, 132408. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132408
	Gong H, Wang W, Wang T, et al. Colors, bioactive compounds, and antioxidant capacity of Ginkgo biloba seeds affected by drying conditions. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 2021, 15 (5): 3953- 3961. doi: 10.1007/s11694-021-00980-0
	Gong W, Chen C, Dobeš C, et al. Phylogeography of a living fossil: pleistocene glaciations forced Ginkgo biloba L. (Ginkgoaceae) into two refuge areas in China with limited subsequent postglacial expansion. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2008, 48 (3): 1094- 1105. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.05.003
	Grotewold E. 2006. The Science of Flavonoids. New York: Springer.
	Li L, Tian Z, Chen J, et al. Characterization of novel loci controlling seed oil content in Brassica napus by marker metabolite-based multi-omics analysis. Genome Biology, 2023, 24 (1): 141. doi: 10.1186/s13059-023-02984-z
	Liu B, Zhao D, Zhang P, et al. Seedling evaluation of six walnut rootstock species originated in China based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis. Scientia Horticulturae, 2020, 265, 109212. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109212
	Lu J, Xu Y, Meng Z, et al. Integration of morphological, physiological and multi-omics analysis reveals the optimal planting density improving leaf yield and active compound accumulation in Ginkgo biloba. Industrial Crops and Products, 2021, 172, 114055. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114055
	Shan S, Luo J, Xu D, et al. Elucidation of micromolecular phenylpropanoid and lignan glycosides as the main antioxidants of Ginkgo seeds. Industrial Crops and Products, 2018, 112, 830- 838. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.12.013
	Song C, Xiang D B, Yan L, et al. Changes in seed growth, levels and distribution of flavonoids during tartary buckwheat seed development. Plant Production Science, 2016, 19 (4): 518- 527. doi: 10.1080/1343943X.2016.1207485
	Tomova T, Slavova I, Tomov D, et al. Ginkgo biloba seeds—an environmental pollutant or a functional food. Horticulturae, 2021, 7 (8): 218. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae7080218
	Wang X, Feng J, Ao G, et al. Globally nitrogen addition alters soil microbial community structure, but has minor effects on soil microbial diversity and richness. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2023, 179, 108982. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.108982
	Wu R, Zou M, Cao J, et al. Removal of ginkgotoxins from the Ginkgo biloba seed powder by enzymatic degradation with the laccase-syringaldehyde system. Industrial Crops and Products, 2024, 217, 118865. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.118865
	Xin Y H, Wu Y X, Qiao B, et al. Evaluation on the phenotypic diversity of Calamansi (Citrus microcarpa) germplasm in Hainan Island. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12 (1): 371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03775-x
	Yao Z, Feng Z, Wu C, et al. Analysis of ggenetic diversity and construction of a core collection of Ginkgo biloba germplasm using EST-SSR markers. Forests, 2023, 14 (11): 2155. doi: 10.3390/f14112155
	Zhang W, Shi M, Wang J, et al. A comprehensive review of ginkgotoxin and ginkgotoxin-5′-glucoside in Ginkgo biloba L. seeds. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2024, 125, 105726. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2023.105726
	Zhang W, Shi M, Zhang F, et al. A facile method to determine the native contents of 4’-O-methylpyridoxine and 4’-O-methylpyridoxine-5’-glucoside in Ginkgo biloba seeds. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2021, 69 (47): 14270- 14277. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c04937
	Zhang Y, Cao Y F, Huo H L, et al. An assessment of the genetic diversity of pear (Pyrus L. ) germplasm resources based on the fruit phenotypic traits. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21 (8): 2275- 2290. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(21)63885-6
	Zhao B, Wang L, Pang S, et al. UV-B promotes flavonoid synthesis in Ginkgo biloba leaves. Industrial Crops and Products, 2020, 151, 112483. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112483
	Zheng J, Zhang X, Fu M, et al. Effects of different stress treatments on the total terpene trilactone content and expression levels of key genes in Ginkgo biloba leaves. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 2020, 38 (4): 521- 530. doi: 10.1007/s11105-020-01220-3

栽培品系编号 Cultivar number	名称 Name	原产地 Origin	栽培品系编号 Cultivar number	名称 Name	原产地 Origin
1	铁富1号 Tiefu No. 1	江苏 Jiangsu	19	大龙眼 Dalongyan	贵州 Guizhou
2	南林果4 Nanlinguo 4	江苏 Jiangsu	20	南林2号 Nanlin No. 2	江苏 Jiangsu
3	铁富3号 Tiefu No. 3	江苏 Jiangsu	21	小园子 Xiaoyuanzi	江苏 Jiangsu
4	泰兴1号 Taixing No. 1	江苏 Jiangsu	22	大佛指 Dafozhi	江苏 Jiangsu
5	南林外4 Nanlinwai 4	江苏 Jiangsu	23	新村9号 Xincun No. 9	山东 Shandong
6	洞庭皇 Dongtinghuang	江苏 Jiangsu	24	郯城202 Tancheng 202	山东 Shandong
7	新民2号 Xinmin No. 2	江苏 Jiangsu	25	圆铃9号 Yuanling No. 9	山东 Shandong
8	苏农佛手 SuNongfoshou	江苏 Jiangsu	26	新村18号 Xincun No. 18	山东 Shandong
9	郯城231 Tancheng 231	山东 Shandong	27	桂林6号 Guilin No. 6	广西 Guangxi
10	港西2号 Gangxi No. 2	陕西 Shanxi	28	桂林9号 Guilin No. 9	广西 Guangxi
11	曹楼1号 Caolou No. 1	江苏 Jiangsu	29	长兴1号 Changxing No. 1	浙江 Zhejiang
12	港西1号 Gangxi No. 1	陕西 Shanxi	30	长兴3号 Changxing No. 3	浙江 Zhejiang
13	铁马1号 Tiema No. 1	江苏 Jiangsu	31	大孤山1号 Dagushan No. 1	辽宁 Liaoning
14	铁马2号 Tiema No. 2	江苏 Jiangsu	32	泰安025 Tai’an 025	山东 Shandong
15	铁马3号 Tiema No. 3	江苏 Jiangsu	33	泰安013 Tai’an 013	山东 Shandong
16	铁马4号 Tiema No. 4	江苏 Jiangsu	34	泰安垂枝 Tai’anchuizhi	山东 Shandong
17	马铃1号 Maling No. 1	山东 Shandong	35	高港2号 Gaogang No. 2	江苏 Jiangsu
18	大马铃（绿仁） Damaling（Lüren）	山东 Shandong	36	高港3号 Gaogang No. 3	江苏 Jiangsu

主成分PC	指标Traits
主成分PC	种核长 NL	种核宽 NW	种核厚 NT	单核质量 SNW	核形系数 NSC	可溶性蛋白 SP	可溶性糖 SS	淀粉 S	总黄酮 TF
PC1	0.39	0.46	0.45	0.46	–0.18	–0.32	0.02	0.09	0.08
PC2	0.15	–0.06	0.03	0.02	0.31	–0.23	0.32	0.47	–0.34
PC3	–0.18	0.12	0.00	0.02	–0.42	–0.14	0.02	0.01	0.56
PC4	0.32	–0.12	–0.09	0.02	0.52	–0.26	0.27	–0.41	0.39
PC5	–0.22	0.01	–0.01	–0.12	–0.27	0.14	0.74	0.25	0.15

主成分PC	指标Traits
主成分PC	总内酯 TP	银杏酸 GA	4’-O-甲基吡哆醇 MPN	特征值 Eigenvalue		贡献率 Contribution rate (%)		累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate (%)
PC1	–0.20	0.00	0.16	4.41		36.77		36.77
PC2	0.26	0.52	–0.21	2.23		18.57		55.34
PC3	0.47	0.20	–0.42	1.36		11.30		66.64
PC4	0.30	–0.13	0.20	1.18		9.82		76.45
PC5	–0.06	–0.08	0.45	0.94		7.82		84.27

[1]	于钊妍,刘甘萍,李芳弟,曹福亮,郭起荣. 银杏无性系种实的无胚现象及其主要成分比较分析[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(6): 12-18.
[2]	符庆成,邱尔发,张媛,王慧超,黄岚虹. 北京市银杏古树心腐特征及其影响因素[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(6): 130-140.
[3]	刘文桢,袁一超,张连金,赵中华. 基于林分内部状态与邻域环境的油松林稳定性评价[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(9): 76-86.
[4]	张岗岗,惠刚盈. 基于累加性和均衡性的林分质量综合评价方法[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(1): 77-84.
[5]	王启繁,沈隽,曾彬,王慧玉,曹田雨,董华君. 漆饰贴面刨花板VOCs及气味释放[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(5): 130-142.
[6]	董楠,张红,张春晖. 陕西省国家森林公园游客满意度——以太白山、太平和王顺山森林公园为例[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(3): 156-163.
[7]	吴项乾,曹林,申鑫,汪贵斌,曹福亮. 基于无人机激光雷达的银杏人工林有效叶面积指数估测[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(1): 74-86.
[8]	刘济铭, 陈仲, 孙操稳, 王连春, 何秋阳, 戴腾飞, 姚娜, 高世轮, 赵国春, 史双龙, 贾黎明, 翁学煌. 无患子属种质资源种实性状变异及综合评价[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(6): 44-54.
[9]	唐海霞, 杜淑辉, 邢世岩, 桑亚林, 李际红, 刘晓静, 孙立民. 银杏性别决定相关基因的筛选[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(2): 76-82.
[10]	罗青红, 宁虎森, 何苗, 吉小敏, 雷春英. 5种沙地灌木对干旱胁迫的生理生态响应[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(11): 29-42.
[11]	林文树, 穆丹, 王丽平, 邵立郡, 吴金卓. 针阔混交林不同演替阶段表层土壤理化性质与优势林木生长的相关性[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(5): 17-25.
[12]	刘欢欢, 曹治国, 贾黎明, 李秀忠, 郝利峰, 刘金强, 王华, 席本野. 基于超声清洗的植物叶片吸滞大气颗粒物定量评估——以银杏为例[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(12): 133-140.
[13]	陈雷, 孙冰, 汪贵斌, 曹福亮, 封超年. 银杏果用林复合经营模式下种仁品质综合评价[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(11): 63-70.
[14]	谢加封, 沈文星, 曹福亮. 复合型林产品价值链演进的空间动力机制——一个系统论的分析框架[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(1): 106-117.
[15]	郭学民, 刘建珍, 翟江涛, 肖啸, 吕亚媚, 李丹丹, 裴士美, 张立彬. 16个品种桃叶片解剖结构与树干抗寒性的关系[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(8): 33-43.

基于表型及功能成分的果用银杏优良栽培品系综合评价

Comprehensive Evaluation of Superior Ginkgo biloba Cultivars for Fruit Production Based on Phenotype and Functional Components

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 0

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者中心

期刊获奖

引证指标

联系方式

栽培品系编号 Cultivar number	综合评分 Score	排名 Range	栽培品系编号 Cultivar number	综合评分 Score	排名 Range	栽培品系编号 Cultivar number	综合评分 Score	排名 Range
1	0.249	13	13	0.187	19	25	0.676	1
2	–0.364	34	14	0.242	14	26	–0.178	32
3	0.139	21	15	–0.141	31	27	0.423	4
4	0.285	10	16	0.125	22	28	0.120	23
5	0.108	25	17	–0.097	30	29	0.420	6
6	0.009	28	18	0.370	8	30	–0.411	36
7	–0.362	33	19	0.359	9	31	0.425	3
8	0.382	7	20	–0.364	35	32	0.050	27
9	–0.080	29	21	0.114	24	33	0.628	2
10	0.254	12	22	0.091	26	34	0.421	5
11	0.218	16	23	0.240	15	35	0.179	20
12	0.200	18	24	0.201	17	36	0.282	11

栽培品系编号 Cultivar number	平均值 Average	排名 Range	栽培品系编号 Cultivar number	平均值 Average	排名 Range	栽培品系编号 Cultivar number	平均值 Average	排名 Range
1	0.570	14	13	0.506	22	25	0.901	1
2	0.412	28	14	0.539	16	26	0.192	35
3	0.463	25	15	0.304	32	27	0.433	26
4	0.664	7	16	0.595	10	28	0.347	30
5	0.573	13	17	0.502	24	29	0.673	6
6	0.535	18	18	0.639	8	30	0.263	33
7	0.341	31	19	0.505	23	31	0.585	12
8	0.791	3	20	0.153	36	32	0.248	34
9	0.406	29	21	0.526	20	33	0.833	2
10	0.558	15	22	0.590	11	34	0.612	9
11	0.529	19	23	0.526	21	35	0.740	5
12	0.538	17	24	0.431	27	36	0.741	4