欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (3): 21-30.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20220033

• 前沿与重点:碳达峰、碳中和目标下林业碳汇能力提升 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国5种主要人工林乔木层碳储量生长模型及其气候驱动分析

曾伟生1,蒲莹1,杨学云1,易善军2   

  1. 1. 国家林业和草原局林草调查规划院 北京 100714
    2. 国家林业和草原局产业发展规划院 北京 100010
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-18 出版日期:2023-03-25 发布日期:2023-05-27
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(31770676);国家财政专项“森林资源监测与评价”(2130207)

Growth Models and Its Climate-Driven Analysis of Carbon Storage in Tree Layers of Five Major Plantation Types in China

Weisheng Zeng1,Ying Pu1,Xueyun Yang1,Shanjun Yi2   

  1. 1. Academy of Forestry Inventory and Planning, National Forestry and Grassland Administration Beijing 100714
    2. Institute of Forestry Industry Development and Planning, National Forestry and Grassland Administration Beijing 100010
  • Received:2022-01-18 Online:2023-03-25 Published:2023-05-27

摘要:

目的: 研建我国5种主要人工林(杉木林、杨树林、桉树林、落叶松林和马尾松林)乔木层碳储量生长模型,确定碳储量平均生长量最大时的林龄,分析固碳能力差异及其受气候因子的影响,为提升人工林碳汇能力和制定森林可持续经营决策提供科学依据。方法: 基于第九次全国森林资源清查8 520块样地碳储量数据,采用非线性加权回归方法和可变参数模型,研建5种主要人工林乔木层碳储量生长模型,分析年均气温、年均降水量对模型参数的影响,并比较5种人工林乔木层固碳能力的差异。结果: 5种主要人工林乔木层碳储量生长模型的平均预估误差在5%以内,模型自检和独立交叉检验的总体相对误差在3%以内。落叶松林、马尾松林、杉木林、杨树林和桉树林乔木层碳储量年均生长量最大时的林龄分别为24、16、12、6和2年,对应的年均生长量分别为1.50、1.85、2.10、2.96和6.97 t?hm?2;马尾松、杉木、杨树和桉树人工林乔木层碳储量最大平均生长量分别是落叶松人工林的1.23、1.40、1.97和4.65倍。年均气温每下降1 ℃,杨树林、马尾松林、桉树林和落叶松林乔木层碳储量年均生长量分别降低7.6%、4.5%、4.4%和3.0%;年均降水量每减少100 mm,落叶松林乔木层碳储量年均生长量降低5.8%,杨树林和桉树林乔木层碳储量年均生长量反而略呈增加趋势。结论: 我国5种主要人工林乔木层固碳能力从高到低依次为桉树林、杨树林、杉木林、马尾松林、落叶松林,均不同程度受年均气温和年均降水量的影响,其中受影响最大的是杨树林,其次是落叶松林、马尾松林和桉树林,杉木林受影响不显著。为发挥我国人工林固碳潜力,应参考其碳储量生长过程合理确定经营周期,并在统筹区域发展的基础上努力发展桉树和杨树人工林。

关键词: 碳储量, 固碳能力, 可变参数, 生长模型, 连年生长量, 平均生长量, 气候因子

Abstract:

Objective: Developing growth models of carbon storage in tree layers for five major plantation types in China, i.e., Chinese fir, popular, eucalyptus, larch, and masson pine, determining the stand age with maximum average carbon growth, and analyzing difference of and climate effect on carbon sequestration capacity would provide scientific basis for increasing carbon sequestration capacity of plantations and decision-making of sustainable forest management. Method: Based on the carbon storage data of 8 520 sample plots from the 9th national forest inventory of China, the growth models of carbon storage in tree layers for five major plantations were developed through using weighted nonlinear regression method and variable parameter model, the impacts of two climate factors, i.e., mean annual temperature (MAT) and precipitation (MAP), to model parameters were analyzed, and the difference of carbon sequestration capacity in tree layers among five plantations was compared. Result: The mean prediction errors of growth models of carbon storage in tree layers for five types of plantations developed in this study are less than 5%, and total relative errors are all less than 3% for both calibration and cross-validation. The mean carbon growth of larch, masson pine, Chinese fir, popular, and eucalyptus plantations reach to the highest 1.50, 1.85, 2.10, 2.96, 6.97 t?hm?2, respectively at 24, 16, 12, 6, and 2 years old of stand age. Comparison to larch plantation, the highest mean carbon growth in tree layers of masson pine, Chinese fir, poplar and eucalyptus plantations are 1.23, 1.40, 1.97 and 4.65 times, respectively. The models were used to analyze the influence of climate factors on carbon storage in tree layers. The results showed that 1 ℃ decrease in MAT could result in 7.6%, 4.5%, 4.0% and 3.0% decrease of annual mean carbon growth for popular, masson pine, eucalyptus, and larch plantations, respectively; and 100 mm decrease in MAP could result in 5.8% decrease of annual mean carbon growth for larch plantation, but increase in some extent for poplar and eucalyptus plantations. Conclusion: The carbon sequestration capacity in tree layers of major five types of plantations was successively eucalyptus, popular, Chinese fir, masson pine and larch, which was affected by MAT and MAP to varying degrees. The most significant effect is to poplar plantation, followed by larch, Masson pine and eucalyptus plantations, but there is no significant effect to Chinese fir plantation. To maximize the carbon sequestration potential of plantations in China, we need to determine reasonable management cycle referring to the growing process of carbon storage, and do efforts for developing eucalyptus and poplar plantations based on balancing regional development.

Key words: carbon storage, carbon sequestration capacity, variable parameter, growth model, annual growth, mean growth, climate factor

中图分类号: