沙地彰武松与樟子松苗木抗旱生理特性比较

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20101209

林业科学 ›› 2010, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12): 56-63.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20101209

沙地彰武松与樟子松苗木抗旱生理特性比较

孟鹏^1,2, 李玉灵¹, 张柏习², 张学利², 雷泽勇³, 宋晓东²

1. 河北农业大学保定071000;2. 辽宁省固沙造林研究所阜新123000;3. 辽宁工程技术大学阜新123000

收稿日期:2009-12-05 修回日期:2010-01-13 出版日期:2010-12-25 发布日期:2010-12-25
通讯作者: 李玉灵

A Comparative Study on Physiological Characteristics of Drought Resistance of Pinus densiflora var. zhangwuensis and P. sylvestris var. mongolica in Sandy Soil

Meng Peng^1,2, Li Yuling¹, Zhang Baixi², Zhang Xueli², Lei Zeyong³, Song Xiaodong²

1. Agricultural University of Hebei Baoding 071000;2. Liaoning Sand-Fixation and Afforestation Research Institute Fuxin 123000;3. Liaoning Technical University Fuxin 123000

Received:2009-12-05 Revised:2010-01-13 Online:2010-12-25 Published:2010-12-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过盆栽控水试验,对4年生彰武松、樟子松苗木在不同水分梯度下形态指标和叶片内丙二醛(MDA)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)、叶绿素(Chl)、脯氨酸(Pro)含量和叶片含水率(LWC)5项抗旱生理指标进行测定。结果表明: 彰武松总干质量、根干质量、茎干质量和根茎比等4个指标都显著高于樟子松,而单片针叶面积显著小于樟子松,针叶厚度略大。在不同水分梯度下,彰武松的MDA含量都小于樟子松,CAT活性、Pro含量都高于樟子松。轻度干旱区〔(40%田间持水量(FMC)〕樟子松叶片中MDA,CAT和Pro含量较对照区(100%FMC)均呈现上升趋势,在中度干旱区(30%FMC)这3个指标继续明显升高,在重度干旱区(20%FMC)它们达到最大值; 而轻度干旱区中彰武松叶片的这3个生理指标反而低于对照区,在中度干旱区它们才开始增大,尤其是CAT含量较对照区显著增加,这些指标也在重度干旱区中达到了最大值。这表明彰武松幼苗在更低的土壤含水率下才表现出胁迫伤害,并且在开始受到胁迫伤害时就迅速提高保护酶(CAT)活性,增加渗透调节物质含量(Pro),实现对干旱胁迫较强的忍耐性和较好的适应性。在不同水分梯度下,彰武松Chl含量和LWC均大于樟子松,这2个指标在同一树种中的变化趋势也相同,大小排序均为: 对照区＞轻度干旱区＞中度干旱区＞重度干旱区。

关键词: 沙地, 彰武松, 樟子松, 抗旱, 生理特性

Abstract:

With a potting experiment, morphological parameters and five physiological indicators including malondialdehyde(MDA), catalase(CAT), chlorophyll(Chl), proline(Pro), and leaf water content(LWC) of the 4-year-old Pinus densiflora var. zhangwuensis and P. sylvestris var. mongolica were measured in different soil moisture gradient. The results showed that: P. densiflora var. zhangwuensis had significantly heavier total dry weight, dry weight of root, dry weight of stem and greater ratio of root and stem, had significantly smaller single needle area, and had slightly more thick needle than P. sylvestris var. mongolica. In different water gradient, P. densiflora var. zhangwuensis had lower MDA contents, and higher CAT and Pro contents than P. sylvestris var. mongolica. In mild drought area(40%FMC), MDA, CAT and Pro contents of P. sylvestris var. mongolica had a ascending trend in comparison with those in control area(100%FMC), and the three physiological indicators had a further increase in moderate drought area(30%FMC) and reached to the maximum in serious drought area(20%FMC). By contrast in mild drought area these three physiological indicators in leaves of P. densiflora var. zhangwuensis were lower than those in control area, and began to increase in moderate drought area, especially the CAT content was significantly higher than that in control area, and they also reached to the maximum in serious drought area. The above results determinated that P. densiflora var. zhangwuensis showed stress symptoms at a lower soil moisture, and it could endure and adapt to drought stress by improving protective enzyme activity(CAT) and increasing osmotic substance(Pro). At different moisture gradient, both Chl and LWC of P. densiflora var. zhangwuensis were more than those of P. sylvestris var. mongolica, and these two indicators in the same species had the same changing trend, which was : CK> mild drought area> moderate drought area> serious drought area.

Key words: sandy soil, Pinus densiflora var. zhangwuensis, P. sylvestris var. mongolica, drought resistance, physiological characteristics

中图分类号:

S791.24

孟鹏;李玉灵;张柏习;张学利;雷泽勇;宋晓东. 沙地彰武松与樟子松苗木抗旱生理特性比较[J]. 林业科学, 2010, 46(12): 56-63.

Meng Peng;Li Yuling;Zhang Baixi;Zhang Xueli;Lei Zeyong;Song Xiaodong. A Comparative Study on Physiological Characteristics of Drought Resistance of Pinus densiflora var. zhangwuensis and P. sylvestris var. mongolica in Sandy Soil[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(12): 56-63.

[1]	王怡霖, 王卫锋, 张芸香, 常淑君, 郭晋平. 碧玉杨叶形态结构与生理特性对干旱的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(4): 42-50.
[2]	卢惠君, 李子义, 梁瀚予, 岳远志, 周天畅, 杨玉璋, 王玉成, 及晓宇. 刚毛柽柳NAC24基因的表达及抗逆功能分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(3): 54-63.
[3]	姚虹宇, 刘亚敏, 张盛楠, 刘玉民, 周文颖, 王针针. 外源柠檬酸对铝胁迫下马尾松生理特性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(7): 155-164.
[4]	张江涛, 杨淑红, 朱镝, 朱延林, 刘友全. 美洲黑杨2025及其2个芽变品种苗对持续干旱的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(6): 33-43.
[5]	陈文荣, 潘霞, 邵俊怡, 廖芳蕾, 杨莉, 胡盈盈, 余颖, 郭卫东. 蓝莓VcLon1基因的克隆、表达及抗旱性分析[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(6): 73-84.
[6]	刘鹏, 贾昕, 杨强, 查天山, 王奔, 马景永. 毛乌素沙地油蒿灌丛生态系统的土壤呼吸特征[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(5): 10-17.
[7]	祁金玉, 宋瑞清. 褐环乳牛肝菌与绿木霉复合接种对辽西北地区樟子松根系的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(5): 62-69.
[8]	马岩岩, 姜立春. 异速生长模型的误差结构和误差函数[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(2): 90-97.
[9]	何凌仙子, 贾志清, 刘涛, 李清雪, 张友焱, 石坤, 冯莉莉, 杨凯悦, 赵雪彬. 高寒沙地中间锦鸡儿和柠条锦鸡儿细根分解动态特征[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(2): 162-169.
[10]	王立祥, 刘晓博, 任利利, 石娟, 骆有庆. 松树蜂入侵的混交林中针叶树种内生真菌多样性[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(9): 81-89.
[11]	唐绯绯, 赵玉琳, 王培龙, 冯德明, 宋怡, 高彩球. 刚毛柽柳ThP5CR基因的克隆及抗逆功能分析[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(7): 1-9.
[12]	杜明凤, 丁贵杰, 赵熙州. 不同家系马尾松对持续干旱的响应及抗旱性[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(6): 21-29.
[13]	罗青红, 宁虎森, 何苗, 吉小敏, 雷春英. 5种沙地灌木对干旱胁迫的生理生态响应[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(11): 29-42.
[14]	姜准, 刘丹一, 陈贝贝, 高海银, 刘春红, 张增悦, 邹旭, 李根前. 中国沙棘克隆生长对造林密度的早期响应及其生物量分配调节机制[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(10): 29-39.
[15]	姜顺邦, 韦小丽. 供水量对花榈木苗期耗水、生长和生理的影响及灌溉制度优化[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(10): 22-30.

沙地彰武松与樟子松苗木抗旱生理特性比较

A Comparative Study on Physiological Characteristics of Drought Resistance of Pinus densiflora var. zhangwuensis and P. sylvestris var. mongolica in Sandy Soil

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者中心

期刊获奖

引证指标

联系方式