毛乌素沙地油蒿灌丛生态系统的土壤呼吸特征

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20180502

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的]探究毛乌素沙地半干旱区典型油蒿灌丛生态系统土壤呼吸速率特征，揭示土壤温湿度对土壤呼吸速率的影响，以期为预估半干旱区土壤碳排放提供科学依据。[方法]在宁夏盐池选取典型油蒿群落，采用切根法剖分土壤呼吸组分，于2014年4—10月利用自动气室法对切根处理与对照样地的土壤呼吸速率进行连续观测，采用指数方程拟合土壤呼吸组分对土壤温度的响应，并运用线性回归分析温度响应函数残差（观测值/预测值）与土壤含水率间的关系。[结果]在日尺度、自养呼吸速率最大值出现时间（11：00）早于土壤温度最大值出现时间（15：00），而异养呼吸速率最大值出现时间基本与土壤温度最大值出现时间一致；在生长季中期（6—8月），土壤总呼吸速率，自养呼吸速率和异养呼吸速率的温度敏感性（Q₁₀）分别为1.51，1.40和1.88；自养呼吸速率对温度的响应受水分的影响，当土壤含水率小于8%时，土壤温度仅能解释自养呼吸速率季节变异的36%（Q₁₀=1.10），自养呼吸速率的温度响应函数残差随土壤含水率升高而增加（R²=0.59，P<0.05）；当土壤含水率大于8%时，自养呼吸速率随土壤温度升高呈指数增加（R² =0.75，Q₁₀=1.88），自养呼吸速率的温度响应函数残差与土壤含水率无显著关系；与自养呼吸速率不同，异养呼吸速率对温度的响应受水分的影响较小，在不同土壤水分条件下均随土壤温度升高呈指数增加（R²>0.65）；自养呼吸贡献率（自养呼吸速率/土壤总呼吸速率）在日尺度上存在中午降低的现象；在季节尺度，R_A/R_T呈现出明显的季节性波动，在5—8月平均为54%，9—10月平均为69%。[结论]在日尺度，自养呼吸速率受土壤温度的影响较小，而异养呼吸速率主要受土壤温度调节；在季节尺度，异养呼吸速率主要受土壤温度调节，其Q₁₀高于自养呼吸速率；而自养呼吸速率对温度的响应受水分的调节，其Q₁₀随土壤含水率升高而增大；自养呼吸贡献率在日尺度与季节尺度的动态变化很可能来源于呼吸组分对环境因子的差异响应。

关键词: 土壤温度, 土壤水分, Q₁₀, 土壤自养呼吸, 土壤异养呼吸, 毛乌素沙地, 油篙

Abstract: [Objective] We investigated the characteristic of soil respiration rate and its responses to soil temperature and soil moisture in a shrubland ecosystem in Mu Us Desert to provide a scientifics basis for predicting soil carbon emission in semiarid region.[Method] The trench method has used in a typical Artemisia ordosica community in Yanchi County to separate the components of soil respiration. Using an automated chamber system, soil respiration rate was measured continuously from April to October 2014 in both trenched and control plots. An exponential function was used to fit the relationship between soil respiration rates and soil temperature (T_s), and a linear regression was used to test the relationship between soil water content (SWC) and temperature normalized soil respiration rates (the ratio of observed values to estimated values).[Result] At the diurnal scale, autotrophic respiration ratio (R_A) showed a middy depression, and reached the peak value earlier (11:00) than T_s (15:00), while heterotrophic respiration ratio (R_H)peaked in consistent with T_s. During mid-growing season (Jun-Aug), the temperature sensitivity (Q₁₀) of total soil respiration ratio (R_T), R_A and R_H was 1.51, 1.40, and 1.88, respectively. However, the response of R_A to T_s was modified by SWC. When SWC < 8%, T_sexplained only 36% of the variation in R_A (Q₁₀=1.10) and temperature normalized R_A showed a significant linear relationship with SWC. When SWC > 8%, R_A increased exponentially with increasing T_s (R²=0.75,Q₁₀=1.88), and there was no significant relationship between temperature normalized R_A and SWC. In contrast to R_A, SWC had little effect on the relationship between R_H and temperature, R_Hincreased exponentially with increase of T_s under different water conditions (R² > 0.65). The contribution of R_A to R_T (R_A/R_T) showed a middy depression at diurnal scale. At the seasonal scale, R_A/R_T showed clear seasonal variation. R_A/R_T averaged 54% during May-Aug and was higher (69%) during Sep-Oct.[Conclusion] At the diurnal scale, R_A was decoupled from T_s, while R_H was primarily controlled by T_s. At the seasonal scale, R_Hwas primarily controlled by T_swith a higher Q₁₀ than that of R_A. However, the response of R_A to T_s was regulated by SWC. The variations in R_A/R_T at diurnal and seasonal scales are most likely derived from the different responses of R_A and R_H to environmental factors. Our result could help understand the dynamics in soil respiration and provided a scientific basis for predicting carbon budget in semiarid regions.

Key words: soil temperature, soil water content, Q₁₀, soil autotrophic respiration, soil heterotrophic respiration, Mu Us Desert, Artemisia ordosica

中图分类号:

S718.55

刘鹏, 贾昕, 杨强, 查天山, 王奔, 马景永. 毛乌素沙地油蒿灌丛生态系统的土壤呼吸特征[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(5): 10-17.

Liu Peng, Jia Xin, Yang Qiang, Zha Tianshan, Wang Ben, Ma Jingyong. Characterization of Soil Respiration in a Shrubland Ecosystem of Artemisia ordosica in Mu Us Desert[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(5): 10-17.

参考文献

李凌浩, 韩兴国, 王其兵,等. 2002. 锡林河流域一个放牧草原群落中根系呼吸占土壤总呼吸比例的初步估计. 植物生态学报,26(1): 29-32.
(Li L H, Han X G, Wang Q B, et al. 2002. Separating root and soil microbial contributions to total soil respiration in a grazed grassland in the Xilan River Basin. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 26(1):29-32. [in Chenese])
刘立新,董云社,齐玉春,等.2007. 应用根去除法对内蒙古温带半干旱草原根系呼吸与土壤总呼吸的区分研究.环境科学, 28(4): 689-694.
(Liu L X, Dong Y S, Qi Y C, et al. 2007. Study of distinguish root respiration from total soil respiration by root exclusion method in the temperate semi-arid grassland in Inner Mongolia, China. Environmental Science, 28(4):689-694. [in Chinese])
王新源,李玉霖,赵学勇,等.2012. 干旱半干旱区不同环境因素对土壤呼吸影响研究进展.生态学报, 32(15):4890-4901.
(Wang X Y, Li Y L, Zhao X Y, et al. 2012. Responses of soil respiration to different environment factors in semi-arid and arid areas. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32(15):4890-4901. [in Chinese])
张金池,孔雨光,王因花,等.2010. 苏北淤泥质海岸典型防护林地土壤呼吸组分分离. 生态学报, 30(12): 3144-3154.
(Zhang J C, Kong Y G, Wang Y H, et al. 2010. Components separation of soil respiration in two typical shelter forestlands in silting coastal area,Northern Jiangsu Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30(12): 3144-3154. [in Chinese])
Andrews J A, Harrison K G, Matamala R, et al. 1999. Seperation of root respiration from total soil respiration using carbon-13 labeling during free-air carbon dioxide enrichment. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 63(2-4): 1429-1435.
Birch H F. 1958.The effect of soil drying on humus decomposition and nitrogen availability. Plant & Soil, 10(1): 9-31.
Chen Q, Li L, Han X, et al. 2003. Acclimatization of soil respiration to warming. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 24(11): 2649-2655.
Davidson E A, Janssens I A. 2006. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature, 440(7081): 165-173.
Feng W, Zhang Y, Jia X, et al. 2014. Impact of environmental factors and biological soil crust types on soil respiration in a desert ecosystem. Plos One, 9(7):e102954.
Gaumont-Guay D, Black T A, Griffis T J, et al. 2006. Interpreting the dependence of soil respiration on soil temperature and water content in a boreal aspen stand. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 140(1): 220-235.
Gaumont-Guay D, Black T A, Barr A G, et al. 2008. Biophysical controls on rhizospheric and heterotrophic components of soil respiration in a boreal black spruce stand. Tree Physiology, 28(2):161-171.
Giardina C P, Ryan M G. 2000. Evidence that decomposition rates of organic carbon in mineral soil do not vary with temperature. Nature, 404(6780): 858-861.
Hanson P J, Edwards N T, Garten C T, et al. 2000. Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: a review of methods and observations. Biogeochemistry, 48(1): 115-146.
Högberg P. 2010. Is tree root respiration more sensitive than heterotrophic respiration to changes in soil temperature?. New Phytologist,188(1): 9-10.
Högberg P, Nordgren A, Buchmann N, et al. 2001. Large-scale forest girdling shows that current photosynthesis drives soil respiration. Nature, 411(6839): 789-792.
Jassal R S, Black T A, Novak M D, et al. 2008. Effect of soil water stress on soil respiration and its temperature sensitivity in an 18-year-old temperate Douglas-fir stand. Global Change Biology, 14(6): 1305-1318.
Janssens I A, Pilegaard K I M. 2003. Large seasonal changes in Q₁₀ of soil respiration in a beech forest. Global Change Biology, 9(6): 911-918.
Jia X, Zha T S, Wu B, et al. 2014. Biophysical controls on net ecosystem CO₂ exchange over a semiarid shrubland in northwest China. Biogeosciences, 11(17): 4679-4693.
Kirschbaum M U F. 1995. The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition and effect of global warming on soil organic C storage. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 27(27): 753-760.
Knorr W, Prentice I C, House J I, et al. 2005. Long-term sensitivity of soil carbon turnover to warming. Nature, 433 (7023): 298-301.
Kuzyakov Y, Gavrichkova O. 2010. Time lag between photosynthesis and carbon dioxide efflux from soil: a review of mechanisms and controls. Global Change Biology, 16(12): 3386-3406.
Li Y Q, Xu M, Zou X M. 2006. Heterotrophic soil respiration in relation to environmental factors and microbial biomass in two wet tropical forests. Plant and Soil, 281(1/2):193-201.
Liu Q, Edwards N T, Post W M, et al. 2006. Temperature-independent diel variation in soil respiration observed from a temperate deciduous forest. Global Change Biology, 12(11): 2136-2145.
Luo Y, Zhou X. 2010. Deconvolution analysis to quantify autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration and their temperature sensitivities. New Phytologist, 188(1): 10-11.
Monson R K, Lipson D L, Burns S P, et al. 2006. Winter forest soil respiration controlled by climate and microbial community composition. Nature, 439(7077): 711-714.
Poulter B, Frank D, Ciais P, et al. 2014. Contribution of semi-arid ecosystems to inter-annual variability of the global carbon cycle. Nature, 509(7502): 600-603.
Saiz G, Black K, Reidy B, et al. 2007. Assessment of soil CO₂ efflux and its components using a process-based model in a young temperate forest site. Geoderma, 139(1): 79-89.
Schlesinger W H, Andrews J A. 2000. Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle. Biogeochemistry, 48(1): 7-20.
Shi W Y, Zhang J G, Yan M J, et al. 2012. Seasonal and diurnal dynamics of soil respiration fluxes in two typical forests on the semiarid Loess Plateau of China: temperature sensitivities of autotrophs and heterotrophs and analyses of integrated driving factors. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 52(3): 99-107.
Wang B, Zha T S, Jia X, et al. 2014. Soil moisture modifies the response of soil respiration to temperature in a desert shrub ecosystem. Biogeosciences, 11(2): 259-268.
Wang B, Zha T S, Jia X, et al. 2015. Microtopographic variation in soil respiration and its controlling factors vary with plant phenophases in a desert-shrub ecosystem. Biogeosciences, 12(19): 5705.
Yan M, Guo N, Ren H, et al. 2015. Autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration of a poplar plantation chronosequence in northwest China. Forest Ecology and Management, 337(337): 119-125.
Zhang L H, Chen Y N, Zhao R F, et al. 2010. Significance of temperature and soil water content on soil respiration in three desert ecosystems in Northwest China. Journal of Arid Environments, 74(10): 1200-1211.

[1]	巫志龙, 周成军, 周新年, 刘富万, 朱奇雄, 黄金湧, 陈文. 不同强度采伐5年后杉阔混交人工林土壤呼吸速率差异[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(6): 142-149.
[2]	汪星, 高志永, 汪有科, 聂真义, 靳姗姗, 董建国. 修剪与覆盖对黄土丘陵区枣林土壤干层的修复效应[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(7): 24-30.
[3]	李豆豆, 席本野, 唐连峰, 冯超, 贺曰林, 张亚雄, 刘龙龙, 刘金强, 贾黎明. 砂壤土下滴灌毛白杨幼林土壤水分运移规律与模拟[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(12): 157-168.
[4]	姜准, 刘丹一, 陈贝贝, 高海银, 刘春红, 张增悦, 邹旭, 李根前. 中国沙棘克隆生长对造林密度的早期响应及其生物量分配调节机制[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(10): 29-39.
[5]	郎莹, 汪明. 春夏两季连翘光合作用的土壤水分阈值效应及生产力分级[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(2): 38-46.
[6]	许新桥, 王伟, 褚建民. 毛乌素沙地长柄扁桃31个优良单株坚果核仁脂肪酸组成变异分析[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(7): 142-147.
[7]	陈文业, 赵明, 张继强, 袁海峰, 窦英杰, 朱丽, 陈旭. 甘肃敦煌西湖荒漠-湿地生态系统土壤水分含量对植被特征的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(11): 8-16.
[8]	王瑞辉, 钟飞霞, 廖文婷, 李婷. 土壤水分对油茶果实生长的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(12): 40-46.
[9]	夏江宝, 张淑勇, 朱丽平, 赵自国, 赵艳云. 贝壳堤岛酸枣树干液流及光合参数对土壤水分的响应特征[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(10): 24-32.
[10]	牛赟, 刘贤德, 敬文茂, 车宗玺, 赵维俊. 祁连山排露沟流域气温、冻土冻融与河川径流特征[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(1): 27-31.
[11]	彭小平, 樊军, 米美霞, 薛智德. 黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区不同立地条件下旱柳树干液流差异[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(9): 38-45.
[12]	葛晓改, 曾立雄, 黄志霖, 肖文发, 谭本旺, 周本智. 土壤温度和水分含量对三峡库区马尾松林凋落物叶分解的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(9): 153-157.
[13]	王延平, 韩明玉, 张林森, 毛晨鹏, 雷玉山. 陕西黄土高原苹果园土壤水分分异特征[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(7): 16-25.
[14]	傅建平, 兰再平, 孙尚伟, 刘俊琴, 张勇. 滴灌条件下杨树人工林土壤的水分运移[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(6): 25-29.
[15]	王雪峰;平藤雅之. 文冠果苗木生长与土壤含水量间关系建模[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(4): 70-76.