欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2003, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 50-55.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20030108

• 论文及研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种原始兰科植物生理生态特征的比较

郭志华 臧润国 奇文清 余让才 刘正宇   

  1. 中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与保护研究所,北京100091;华南农业大学生命科学学院,广州510642;重庆市药物研究所,重庆408435
  • 收稿日期:2000-10-10 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2003-01-25 发布日期:2003-01-25

COMPARISON OF THE ECO-PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS BETWEEN TANGTSINIA NANCHUANICAAND CEPHALANTHERA FALCATA

Guo Zhihua,Zang Runguo,Qi Wenqing,Yu Rangcai,Liu Zhengyu   

  1. The Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry\ Beijing100091;College of Life Science, South China Agriculture University\ Guangzhou510642;College of Life Science, South China Agriculture University\ Guangzhou510642;The Research Institute of Pharmic Plants of Chongqing Chongqing408435
  • Received:2000-10-10 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2003-01-25 Published:2003-01-25

摘要:

金佛山兰(Tangtsinia nanchuanica)为国家二级保护植物,野外个体数量极稀少,仅见于重庆南川金佛山及附近的稀疏马尾松林下,并且仅与其亲源种金兰(Cephalanthera falcata)生长在一起。对比研究了生长在温室内的金佛山兰和金兰的多项生理生态指标。结果表明,金佛山兰与金兰只在气孔导度、水分利用率及胞间CO2 浓度方面有显著差异。金佛山兰的净光合速率、暗呼吸速率、蒸腾速率、气孔导度、胞间CO2 浓度、光补偿点、光饱和点、光能利用率和水分利用率分别为6.16(±0.4) μmol·m-2s-1、0.47(±0.0 4) μmol·m-2s-1、2.7(±0.2 )mmol·m-2s-1、0.114(±0.02)mol·m-2s-1、206(±29) μmol·mol-1、10 μmolphotons·m-2s-1、200μmolphotons·m-2s-1、9.6(±0.9)%、3.1(±0.2 )mmolCO2·mol-1 H2O ;金兰的各项值分别为5.8(±1.1) μmol·m-2s-1、0.45(±0.06) μmol·m-2s-1、2.6(±0.3)mmol·m-2s-1、0.101(±0.03)mol·m-2s-1、173(±51) μmol·mol-1、10 μmolphotons·m-2s-1、200 μmolphotons·m-2s-1、9.1 (±1.1)%、2.7(±0.7)mmolCO2·mol-1 H2O。在温室内晴天条件下,金佛山兰和金兰的净光合速率能在1d中保持较长时间的高值期,无明显午休。金佛山兰和金兰均为能忍受一定强光照的耐荫植物,并且其正常生长发育需要一定强度的光照条件;两者光合作用的最适温度约为15~25℃。此外,蒸腾速率、水分利用率、气温和光合有效辐射等因子的综合作用对金佛山兰净光合速率的影响最大;气孔导度、胞间CO2 浓度、CO2 浓度、蒸腾速率、光合有效辐射、相对湿度和光能利用率等因子的综合作用对金兰净光合速率的影响最大。

关键词: 金佛山兰, 金兰, 光合速率, 蒸腾速率

Abstract:

Tangtsinia nanchuanica is a kind of rare plants, a class Ⅱ protected species in China. Its wild individuals have been hardly found. In this paper, the eco-physiological characteristics of Tangtsinia nanchuanica and its relative Cephalanthera falcata were compared. Using the LI COR6400 Portable Photosynthesis System, we measured some eco-physiological indicators of the two plants. Except the indicators such as stomatal conductivity (Con), water use efficiency (WUE) and internal CO2 concentration(Ci), Tangtsinia nanchuanica and Cephalanthera falcata had not significant differences in net photosynthetic rate(Pn), transpiration rate(E) and other indicators. The Pn, dark respiration rate(Rd),E, Con, Ci, Light compensation point (LCP) , light saturation point (LSP) , solar energy use efficiency (SUE) and WUE of Tangtsinia nanchuanica were 6.16(±0.4) μmol·m-2s-1,0.47(±0.04) μmol·m-2s-1,2.7(±0.2) mmol·m-2s-1, 0.114(±0.02) mol·m-2s-1, 206(±29) μmol·mol-1, 10 μmol photons·m-2s-1, 200 μmol photons·m-2s-1, 9.6(±0.9)%, 3.1(±0.2) mmol CO2·mol-1 H2O respectively. Accordingly, the Pn,Rd, E, Con, Ci, LCP, LSP, SUE and WUE of Cephalanthera falcata were 5.8 (±1.1) μmol·m-2s-1, 0.45(±0.06) μmol·m-2s-1, 2.6(±0.3) mmol·m-2s-1, 0.101(±0.03) mol·m-2s-1, 173(±51) μmol·mol-1, 10 μmol photons·m-2s-1, 200 μmol photons·m-2s-1, 9.1(±1.1)%, 2.7(±0.7) mmol CO2·mol-1 H2O. In the greenhouse, the high Pn values of the orchids were observed from 9:00 to 13:00 and the midday photosynthetic depression was not observed on sunny days in summer. According to the light response of Pn, Tangtsinia nanchuanica and Cephalanthera falcata were both shade tolerant plant but could tolerate strong lights less than 1 000 μmol photons·m-2s-1. Based on the temperature response of Pn, the favorable temperature for the two orchids was 15~25℃. By the stepwise multiple regression, it was found that E, WUE, Con, Ci, air temperature and PAR were the most dominant factors affecting the Pn of Tangtsinia nanchuanica, and the Con, Ci, air CO2 concentration, E, PAR, relative humidity and SUE were the most dominant factors affecting the Pn of Cephalanthera falcata.

Key words: Tangtsinia nanchuanica, Cephalanthera falcata, Photosynthesis rate, Transpiration rate