Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (6): 71-81.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20250420
• Research papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Jun Liu,Xunzhi Ouyang,Ping Pan*(
),Yi Zheng,Liping Zheng,Chang Liu
Received:2025-07-01
Revised:2026-01-18
Online:2026-06-10
Published:2026-06-13
Contact:
Ping Pan
E-mail:panping@jxau.edu.cn
CLC Number:
Jun Liu,Xunzhi Ouyang,Ping Pan,Yi Zheng,Liping Zheng,Chang Liu. Influence of Tree Species Diversity on Intraspecific and Interspecific Competition in Natural Pinus massoniana Forests[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2026, 62(6): 71-81.
Table 1
A profile of stand factors"
| 变量Variable | 最小值Minimum | 最大值Maximum | 平均值Mean | 标准差Standard deviation |
| 平均胸径Average DBH/cm | 9.1 | 18.7 | 13.2 | 2.6 |
| 平均树高Average height/m | 7.7 | 14.2 | 10.7 | 1.5 |
| 株数密度Tree density/hm?2 | 689 | 2 500 | 1 709 | 485 |
| 郁闭度Canopy density | 0.30 | 0.90 | 0.67 | 0.14 |
| 林分断面积Stand basal area/(m2·hm?2) | 12.29 | 44.40 | 22.61 | 7.58 |
| Patrick丰富度Patrick richness | 2 | 12 | 6 | 3.03 |
| Shannon-Wiener多样性Shannon-Wiener diversity | 0.45 | 1.95 | 1.01 | 0.41 |
| Pielou均匀度Pielou evenness | 0.31 | 0.96 | 0.64 | 0.15 |
Table 2
Composition of dominant tree species across different levels of tree species diversity indices"
| 树种多样性指标 Tree species diversity indices | 等级 Levels | 树种组成 Species composition |
| Patrick丰富度 Patrick richness | 低Low | 7马尾松Pinus massoniana 2木荷Schima superba 1杉木Cunninghamia lanceolata |
| 中Medium | 7马尾松Pinus massoniana 2木荷Schima superba 1杉木Cunninghamia lanceolata | |
| 高High | 6马尾松Pinus massoniana 2木荷Schima superba 1杉木Cunninghamia lanceolata 1丝栗栲Castanopsis fargesii +三花冬青Ilex triflora | |
| Shannon-Wiener 多样性 Shannon-Wiener diversity | 低Low | 8马尾松Pinus massoniana 2木荷Schima superba +杉木Cunninghamia lanceolata |
| 中Medium | 7马尾松Pinus massoniana 2木荷Schima superba 1杉木Cunninghamia lanceolata + 枫香Liquidambar formosana | |
| 高High | 6马尾松Pinus massoniana 2木荷Schima superba 1杉木Cunninghamia lanceolata 1丝栗栲Castanopsis fargesii +三花冬青Ilex triflora | |
| Pielou均匀度 Pielou evenness | 低Low | 7马尾松Pinus massoniana 2木荷Schima superba 1杉木Cunninghamia lanceolata + 枫香Liquidambar formosana |
| 中Medium | 6马尾松Pinus massoniana 2木荷Schima superba 2杉木Cunninghamia lanceolata | |
| 高High | 6马尾松Pinus massoniana 2木荷Schima superba 1丝栗栲Castanopsis fargesii 1杉木Cunninghamia lanceolata +三花冬青Ilex triflora |
Table 3
Objective trees, competitive trees and intraspecific CI across different levels of tree species diversity indices"
| 树种多样性 指标 Tree species diversity indices | 径级 Diameter class/cm | 低Low | 中Medium | 高High | |||||||||||
| 对象木株数 Number of objective trees | 竞争木株数 Number of competitive trees | 种内竞争 指数 Intraspecific CI | 平均竞争 指数 Average CI | 对象木株数 Number of objective trees | 竞争木株数 Number of competitive trees | 种内竞争 指数 Intraspecific CI | 平均竞争 指数 Average CI | 对象木株数 Number of objective trees | 竞争木株数 Number of competitive trees | 种内竞争 指数 Intraspecific CI | 平均竞争 指数 Average CI | ||||
| Patrick丰富度 Patrick richness | 5≤D<10 | 555(50.92) | 1 032(60.00) | 2 262.20(68.38) | 3.96±1.05a | 463(40.44) | 902(48.18) | 2 014.02(59.30) | 3.59±1.40a | 176(26.04) | 606(39.97) | 766.21(49.14) | 3.92±1.59a | ||
| 10≤D<15 | 329(30.18) | 456(26.51) | 750.95(22.70) | 2.23±0.72a | 356(31.09) | 564(30.13) | 887.44(26.13) | 2.20±0.79a | 168(24.85) | 398(26.25) | 413.96(26.55) | 2.14±0.90a | |||
| 15≤D<20 | 150(13.76) | 173(10.06) | 235.42(7.11) | 1.51±0.63a | 195(17.03) | 260(13.89) | 381.25(11.22) | 1.89±1.46a | 142(21.01) | 264(17.41) | 213.95(13.72) | 1.36±0.58a | |||
| 20≤D<25 | 45(4.13) | 49(2.85) | 53.56(1.62) | 0.92±0.68a | 81(7.07) | 97(5.18) | 81.94(2.41) | 1.11±0.49a | 84(12.42) | 135(8.91) | 92.26(5.92) | 0.88±0.49a | |||
| 25≤D<30 | 9(0.83) | 9(0.52) | 5.94(0.18) | 0.15±0.32b | 32(2.80) | 36(1.92) | 21.16(0.62) | 0.60±0.54a | 56(8.28) | 63(4.16) | 45.39(2.91) | 0.78±0.42a | |||
| D≥30 | 2(0.18) | 1(0.06) | 0.39(0.01) | 0.04±0.12b | 18(1.57) | 13(0.70) | 10.69(0.32) | 0.39±0.49a | 50(7.40) | 50(3.30) | 27.36(1.76) | 0.36±0.34a | |||
| 合计Total | 1 090(100) | 1 720(100) | 3 308.46(100) | 2.84±0.80a | 1 145(100) | 1 872(100) | 3 396.50(100) | 2.51±1.12a | 676(100) | 1 516(100) | 1 559.13(100) | 1.99±0.93a | |||
| Shannon-Wiener多样性 Shannon-Wiener diversity | 5≤D<10 | 676(51.92) | 1 031(57.25) | 2 999.13(67.70) | 4.21±1.04a | 362(36.60) | 895(50.03) | 1 394.19(55.90) | 3.49±1.23a | 156(25.16) | 614(40.45) | 649.10(48.44) | 3.73±1.69a | ||
| 10≤D<15 | 392(30.11) | 506(28.09) | 991.19(22.37) | 2.50±0.63a | 311(31.45) | 502(28.06) | 702.65(28.17) | 2.04±0.68a | 150(24.19) | 410(27.01) | 358.52(26.76) | 2.04±0.98a | |||
| 15≤D<20 | 168(12.90) | 190(10.55) | 361.30(8.16) | 2.07±1.50a | 201(20.32) | 266(14.87) | 302.17(12.12) | 1.44±0.42a | 118(19.03) | 241(15.88) | 167.15(12.47) | 1.28±0.63a | |||
| 20≤D<25 | 49(3.76) | 58(3.22) | 66.63(1.50) | 1.26±0.64a | 71(7.18) | 82(4.58) | 66.98(2.68) | 0.76±0.45b | 90(14.52) | 141(9.29) | 94.15(7.03) | 0.91±0.45ab | |||
| 25≤D<30 | 12(0.92) | 12(0.67) | 8.64(0.20) | 0.21±0.37b | 29(2.93) | 34(1.90) | 20.23(0.81) | 0.64±0.56a | 56(9.03) | 62(4.08) | 43.63(3.26) | 0.70±0.43a | |||
| D≥30 | 5(0.39) | 4(0.22) | 3.15(0.07) | 0.18±0.35a | 15(1.52) | 10(0.56) | 7.92(0.32) | 0.27±0.46a | 50(8.07) | 50(3.29) | 27.36(2.04) | 0.36±0.34a | |||
| 合计Total | 1 302(100) | 1 801(100) | 4 430.04(100) | 3.16±0.85a | 989(100) | 1 789(100) | 2 494.14(100) | 2.29±0.79b | 620(100) | 1 518(100) | 1 339.91(100) | 1.87±0.97b | |||
| Pielou均匀度 Pielou evenness | 5≤D<10 | 539(43.19) | 802(46.15) | 2 525.23(60.76) | 4.33±0.92a | 303(36.24) | 877(49.33) | 1 232.81(59.09) | 3.79±1.64a | 352(42.56) | 861(54.08) | 1 284.38(63.53) | 3.32±1.28a | ||
| 10≤D<15 | 379(30.37) | 508(29.23) | 1 022.82(24.61) | 2.49±0.94a | 238(28.47) | 494(27.78) | 532.79(25.54) | 2.03±0.81a | 236(28.54) | 416(26.13) | 496.76(24.57) | 2.05±0.54a | |||
| 15≤D<20 | 218(17.47) | 279(16.05) | 468.00(11.26) | 2.22±1.44a | 150(17.94) | 247(13.89) | 208.02(9.97) | 1.40±0.48b | 119(14.39) | 171(10.74) | 154.60(7.65) | 1.16±0.47b | |||
| 20≤D<25 | 65(5.21) | 92(5.29) | 96.50(2.32) | 1.35±0.64a | 90(10.77) | 107(6.02) | 83.11(3.98) | 0.94±0.33b | 55(6.65) | 82(5.15) | 48.14(2.38) | 0.64±0.41b | |||
| 25≤D<30 | 26(2.08) | 35(2.01) | 26.53(0.64) | 0.73±0.57a | 37(4.43) | 41(2.31) | 21.19(1.02) | 0.45±0.46a | 34(4.11) | 32(2.01) | 24.77(1.22) | 0.38±0.43a | |||
| D≥30 | 21(1.68) | 22(1.27) | 17.06(0.41) | 0.47±0.49a | 18(2.15) | 12(0.67) | 8.29(0.40) | 0.18±0.30a | 31(3.75) | 30(1.89) | 13.09(0.65) | 0.17±0.27a | |||
| 合计Total | 1 248(100) | 1 738(100) | 4 156.14(100) | 2.97±1.04a | 836(100) | 1 778(100) | 2 086.21(100) | 2.28±0.86ab | 827(100) | 1 592(100) | 2 021.74(100) | 2.05±0.95b | |||
Table 4
Interspecific CI across different levels of tree species diversity indices"
| 树种多样性指标 Tree species diversity indices | 径级 Diameter class/cm | 低Low | 中Medium | 高High | |||||
| 种间竞争指数 Interspecific CI | 平均竞争指数 Average CI | 种间竞争指数 Interspecific CI | 平均竞争指数 Average CI | 种间竞争指数 Interspecific CI | 平均竞争指数 Average CI | ||||
| Patrick丰富度 Patrick richness | 5≤D<10 | 627.55(56.94) | 1.41±0.90a | 558.58(49.77) | 1.38±1.00a | 366.63(37.62) | 2.39±1.54a | ||
| 10≤D<15 | 336.09(30.49) | 1.04±0.47a | 328.36(29.25) | 1.18±0.78a | 258.91(26.57) | 1.62±1.14a | |||
| 15≤D<20 | 105.25(9.55) | 0.71±0.42b | 133.36(11.88) | 0.80±0.60ab | 176.00(18.06) | 1.37±1.04a | |||
| 20≤D<25 | 24.15(2.19) | 0.60±0.37a | 61.46(5.48) | 0.61±0.47a | 74.42(7.64) | 0.82±0.52a | |||
| 25≤D<30 | 3.87(0.35) | 0.12±0.27b | 28.45(2.53) | 0.77±1.12a | 57.62(5.91) | 0.83±0.53a | |||
| D≥30 | 5.26(0.48) | 0.48±1.15a | 12.23(1.09) | 0.26±0.37a | 40.91(4.20) | 0.66±0.58a | |||
| 合计Total | 1 102.17(100) | 1.07±0.55a | 1 122.44(100) | 1.09±0.59a | 974.49(100) | 1.47±0.45a | |||
| Shannon-Wiener多样性 Shannon-Wiener diversity | 5≤D<10 | 654.99(61.34) | 1.18±0.85b | 508.06(45.84) | 1.37±0.66b | 389.70(38.09) | 2.63±1.55a | ||
| 10≤D<15 | 305.35(28.60) | 0.80±0.49b | 343.33(30.98) | 1.28±0.59ab | 274.68(26.85) | 1.77±1.12a | |||
| 15≤D<20 | 77.93(7.29) | 0.47±0.36b | 159.81(14.42) | 0.97±0.48ab | 176.88(17.29) | 1.45±1.01a | |||
| 20≤D<25 | 19.60(1.84) | 0.37±0.37b | 58.96(5.32) | 0.74±0.39a | 81.47(7.96) | 0.92±0.46a | |||
| 25≤D<30 | 4.16(0.39) | 0.11±0.26b | 26.41(2.38) | 0.76±1.17a | 59.38(5.81) | 0.91±0.48a | |||
| D≥30 | 5.77(0.54) | 0.46±1.09a | 11.71(1.06) | 0.25±0.39a | 40.91(4.00) | 0.66±0.58a | |||
| 合计Total | 1 067.80(100) | 0.87±0.52b | 1 108.28(100) | 1.16±0.40b | 1 023.02(100) | 1.61±0.48a | |||
| Pielou均匀度 Pielou evenness | 5≤D<10 | 479.56(51.41) | 1.31±0.96a | 536.76(44.15) | 1.83±1.05a | 536.43(51.06) | 2.04±1.61a | ||
| 10≤D<15 | 259.59(27.83) | 0.73±0.71b | 369.14(30.36) | 1.69±0.62a | 294.63(28.05) | 1.42±0.97a | |||
| 15≤D<20 | 125.22(13.43) | 0.74±1.15a | 172.10(14.15) | 1.20±0.41a | 117.30(11.17) | 0.94±0.54a | |||
| 20≤D<25 | 34.29(3.68) | 0.33±0.39b | 82.86(6.81) | 0.84±0.39a | 42.89(4.08) | 0.86±0.41a | |||
| 25≤D<30 | 17.46(1.87) | 0.25±0.49b | 39.65(3.26) | 1.06±1.07a | 32.83(3.13) | 0.47±0.53ab | |||
| D≥30 | 16.60(1.78) | 0.35±0.54a | 15.38(1.27) | 0.35±0.44a | 26.41(2.51) | 0.67±1.10a | |||
| 合计Total | 932.72(100) | 0.87±0.54b | 1 215.89(100) | 1.49±0.43a | 1 050.49(100) | 1.27±0.52ab | |||
Table 5
Fitting models of DBH and CI across different levels of tree species diversity indices"
| 树种多样性指标Tree species diversity indices | 等级Grade | 类型Type | 公式Formula | R2 |
| Patrick丰富度 Patrick richness | 低Low | 种内竞争指数Intraspecific CI | y=3.935x-0.961 | 0.193 |
| 种间竞争指数Interspecific CI | y=3.950x-1.009 | 0.225 | ||
| 总竞争指数Total CI | y=4.082x-0.992 | 0.209 | ||
| 中Medium | 种内竞争指数Intraspecific CI | y=4.694x-0.989 | 0.230 | |
| 种间竞争指数Interspecific CI | y=5.271x-1.092 | 0.322 | ||
| 总竞争指数Total CI | y=5.259x-1.055 | 0.276 | ||
| 高High | 种内竞争指数Intraspecific CI | y=4.218x-0.870 | 0.226 | |
| 种间竞争指数Interspecific CI | y=4.042x-0.995 | 0.283 | ||
| 总竞争指数Total CI | y=4.935x-1.001 | 0.278 | ||
| Shannon-Wiener多样性 Shannon-Wiener diversity | 低Low | 种内竞争指数Intraspecific CI | y=4.430x-1.009 | 0.218 |
| 种间竞争指数Interspecific CI | y=4.609x-1.066 | 0.243 | ||
| 总竞争指数Total CI | y=4.549x-1.030 | 0.227 | ||
| 中Medium | 种内竞争指数Intraspecific CI | y=4.562x-0.967 | 0.218 | |
| 种间竞争指数Interspecific CI | y=4.128x-1.015 | 0.287 | ||
| 总竞争指数Total CI | y=4.820x-1.024 | 0.259 | ||
| 高High | 种内竞争指数Intraspecific CI | y=4.288x-0.855 | 0.222 | |
| 种间竞争指数Interspecific CI | y=4.686x-1.040 | 0.294 | ||
| 总竞争指数Total CI | y=5.316x-1.022 | 0.281 | ||
| Pielou均匀度 Pielou evenness | 低Low | 种内竞争指数Intraspecific CI | y=4.053x-0.932 | 0.213 |
| 种间竞争指数Interspecific CI | y=3.678x-0.958 | 0.255 | ||
| 总竞争指数Total CI | y=4.192x-0.961 | 0.234 | ||
| 中Medium | 种内竞争指数Intraspecific CI | y=4.043x-0.903 | 0.201 | |
| 种间竞争指数Interspecific CI | y=0.880e-0.069x | 0.282 | ||
| 总竞争指数Total CI | y=4.684x-1.000 | 0.259 | ||
| 高High | 种内竞争指数Intraspecific CI | y=2.970x-0.821 | 0.181 | |
| 种间竞争指数Interspecific CI | y=4.520x-1.066 | 0.333 | ||
| 总竞争指数Total CI | y=4.025x-0.982 | 0.271 |
| 艾萨迪拉·玉苏甫, 玉米提·哈力克, 巴比尔江·迪力夏提, 等. 基于激光雷达数据的塔里木河下游胡杨种群空间分布格局和种内竞争关系. 林业科学, 2024, 60 (4): 31- 39. | |
| Asadilla Y, Umut H, Babierjiang D, et al. Spatial distribution pattern and intraspecific competition of Populus euphratica population in the lower reaches of the Tarim River based on LiDAR data. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2024, 60 (4): 31- 39. | |
|
曹雨婷, 叶生晶, 张 超, 等. 大同山杉木人工林林分空间结构与种内竞争关系. 东北林业大学学报, 2024, 52 (5): 8- 12, 18.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2024.05.002 |
|
|
Cao Y T, Ye S J, Zhang C, et al. Spatial structure of forest stand and intra-specific competition in the Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation in Datong mountain. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2024, 52 (5): 8- 12, 18.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2024.05.002 |
|
| 陈 诗, 海 鑫, 史训旺, 等. 宝天曼马尾松和槲栎混交林的竞争关系分析. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2018, 38 (2): 10- 15. | |
| Chen S, Hai X, Shi X W, et al. The competitive relationship of Pinus massoniana and Quercus aliena mixed forest in Baotianman National Nature Reserve. Journal of Southwest Forestry University (Natural Sciences), 2018, 38 (2): 10- 15. | |
|
陈永刚, 汤孟平, 杨春菊, 等. 天然毛竹林竞争空间关系分析. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39 (7): 726- 735.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0069 |
|
|
Chen Y G, Tang M P, Yang C J, et al. Spatial analysis of competition in natural Phyllostachys edulis community. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 39 (7): 726- 735.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0069 |
|
| 方 坚, 王孝安, 郭 华, 等. 黄土高原马栏林区辽东栎林种内、种间竞争研究. 西北植物学报, 2007, 27 (2): 334- 339. | |
| Fang J, Wang X A, Guo H, et al. Intraspecific and interspecific competition of Quercus liaotungensis in Malan Forest Rregion of Loess Plateau. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2007, 27 (2): 334- 339. | |
| 付梦瑶, 崔秋芳, 吴 明, 等. 松栎混交林中马尾松的种内种间竞争. 河南农业大学学报, 2016, 50 (3): 311- 317. | |
| Fu M Y, Cui Q F, Wu M, et al. Intraspecific and interspecific competition of Pinus massoniana and Quercus acutissima mixed artificial forest. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2016, 50 (3): 311- 317. | |
| 郝月兰, 张会儒, 唐守正. 2011. Voronoi图方法确定云冷杉林最近邻木的适用性研究. 林业资源管理 (6): 59-64. | |
| Hao Y L, Zhang H R, Tang S Z. 2011. Study on the adaptability of Voronoi diagram on determining the nearest neighboring trees of natural mixed Spruce-fir forests. Forest Resources Management, (6): 59-64. [in Chinese] | |
| 李志洪, 胡淑仪, 李 伟, 等. 粤东北马尾松−木荷混交林种内种间竞争强度分析. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2013, 33 (8): 91- 95. | |
| Li Z H, Hu S Y, Li W, et al. Intra-specific and inter-specific competitions among major trees species in Pinus massoniana and Schima superba mixed forest in northeastern Guangdong Province. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2013, 33 (8): 91- 95. | |
|
林 晗, 吴承祯, 陈 辉, 等. 杉木−千年桐人工混交林种内种间竞争关系分析. 福建林学院学报, 2014, 34 (4): 316- 321.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-389X.2014.04.005 |
|
|
Lin H, Wu C Z, Chen H, et al. Intraspecific and interspecific competition in the mixed stands of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Aleurites montana. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry, 2014, 34 (4): 316- 321.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-389X.2014.04.005 |
|
|
刘淑燕, 余新晓, 陈丽华, 等. 松山自然保护区辽东栎群落种内、种间竞争关系. 水土保持通报, 2009, 29 (6): 91- 94.
doi: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2009.06.006 |
|
|
Liu S Y, Yu X X, Chen L H, et al. Intraspecific and interspecific competition of Quercus liaotungensis community in Songshan Nature Reserve. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 29 (6): 91- 94.
doi: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2009.06.006 |
|
|
刘万生, 李 想, 陈福元, 等. 蒙古栎林种内和种间竞争研究. 植物研究, 2020, 40 (4): 552- 558.
doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2020.04.009 |
|
|
Liu W S, Li X, Chen F Y, et al. Intraspecific and interspecific competition of Quercus mongolica forest. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2020, 40 (4): 552- 558.
doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2020.04.009 |
|
|
潘 萍, 韩天一, 欧阳勋志, 等. 飞播马尾松林碳密度分配特征及其影响因素. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28 (12): 3841- 3847.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201712.001 |
|
|
Pan P, Han T Y, Ouyang X Z, et al. Carbon density distribution characteristics and influencing factors in aerially seeded Pinus massoniana plantations. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28 (12): 3841- 3847.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201712.001 |
|
|
冉松松, 余再鹏, 万晓华, 等. 邻域树种多样性对杉木叶片氮磷生态化学计量比的影响. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47 (7): 932- 942.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0128 |
|
|
Ran S S, Yu Z P, Wan X H, et al. Effects of neighborhood tree species diversity on foliar nitrogen-phosphorus stoichiometry of Cunninghamia lanceolata. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2023, 47 (7): 932- 942.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0128 |
|
| 沈琛琛, 雷相东, 王福有, 等. 金苍林场蒙古栎天然中龄林竞争关系研究. 林业科学研究, 2012, 25 (3): 339- 345. | |
| Shen C C, Lei X D, Wang F Y, et al. Competitive states in natural middle-aged forest of Mongolian oak at Jincang Forest Farm. Forest Research, 2012, 25 (3): 339- 345. | |
|
孙千惠, 吴 霞, 姚小兰, 等. 林分密度对生态公益林群落结构和物种多样性的影响: 以新津文峰山马尾松为例. 四川农业大学学报, 2018, 36 (3): 315- 322.
doi: 10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2018.03.007 |
|
|
Sun Q H, Wu X, Yao X L, et al. Effects of stand density on community structure and species diversity of ecological non-commercial forest—a case study on Pinus massoniana in Wenfeng Mountain, Xinjin district, Sichuan Province. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2018, 36 (3): 315- 322.
doi: 10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2018.03.007 |
|
|
汪 清, 潘 萍, 欧阳勋志, 等. 马尾松-木荷不同比例混交林种内和种间竞争强度. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40 (1): 49- 57.
doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202101.016 |
|
|
Wang Q, Pan P, Ouyang X Z, et al. Intraspecific and interspecific competition intensity in mixed plantation with different proportion of Pinus massoniana and Schima superba. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021, 40 (1): 49- 57.
doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202101.016 |
|
|
温 馨, 王天罡, 程小琴. 山西太岳山不同径级油松种内竞争与叶功能性状. 生态学报, 2024, 44 (22): 10300- 10308.
doi: 10.20103/j.stxb.202404210885 |
|
|
Wen X, Wang T G, Cheng X Q. The intraspecious competition and leaf functional traits of Pinus tabulaeformis with different diameter classes in Taiyue Mountain, Shanxi Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44 (22): 10300- 10308.
doi: 10.20103/j.stxb.202404210885 |
|
|
邢海涛, 陆元昌, 刘宪钊, 等. 基于近自然改造的马尾松林分竞争强度研究. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38 (9): 42- 54.
doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160023 |
|
|
Xing H T, Lu Y C, Liu X Z, et al. Competition intensity of Pinus massoniana stand based on close-to-nature management. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38 (9): 42- 54.
doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160023 |
|
| 姚慧芳, 卢 杰, 曾加芹, 等. 藏东南川滇高山栎天然林的种内与种间竞争指数的海拔差异. 林业科学, 2022, 58 (8): 53- 62. | |
| Yao H F, Lu J, Zeng J Q, et al. Altitudinal differences in intraspecific and interspecific competition index of natural forests of Quercus aquifolioides in southeast Tibet. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58 (8): 53- 62. | |
| 殷鸣放, 薛 娟, 宁良智, 等. 基于近自然林业经营的不同密度林木竞争关系比较分析. 西北林学院学报, 2013, 28 (5): 149- 153,199. | |
| Yin M F, Xue J, Ning L Z, et al. Comparative study on competition relationship of the forests with different densities based on near-nature forestry management. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2013, 28 (5): 149- 153,199. | |
| 张 浩, 刘万生, 王彦琦, 等. 东北三大硬阔种内和种间竞争关系. 植物研究, 2024, 44 (6): 870- 878. | |
| Zhang H, Liu W S, Wang Y Q, et al. Intraspecific and interspecific competitions of the three hardwood tree species in northeast China. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2024, 44 (6): 870- 878. | |
| Bai J L, Ren C Y, Shi X Y, et al. Tree species diversity impacts on ecosystem services of temperate forests. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 167, 112639. | |
| Bolnick D I, Ingram T, Stutz W E, et al. Ecological release from interspecific competition leads to decoupled changes in population and individual niche width. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2010, 277 (1689): 1789- 1797. | |
| Cadotte M, Albert C H, Walker S C. The ecology of differences: assessing community assembly with trait and evolutionary distances. Ecology Letters, 2013, 16 (10): 1234- 1244. | |
| Guo Q X, Zhang Y B, Wang D L, et al. Influence of soil qualities on intra- and interspecific competition dynamics of Larix kaempferi and L. olgensis. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2017, 135, 96- 105. | |
| Hegyi F. A simulation model for managing jack-pine standssimulation. Royal College of Forestry Resreach, 1974, 30, 74- 90. | |
| Holden E M, Cahill J F Jr. Plant trait dissimilarity increases competitive interactions among co-occurring plants. Functional Ecology, 2024, 38 (7): 1464- 1474. | |
| Kahriman A, Şahin A, Sönmez T, et al. A novel approach to selecting a competition index: the effect of competition on individual-tree diameter growth of Calabrian pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2018, 48 (10): 1217- 1226. | |
| Kraft N J B, Crutsinger G M, Forrestel E J, et al. Functional trait differences and the outcome of community assembly: an experimental test with vernal pool annual plants. Oikos, 2014, 123 (11): 1391- 1399. | |
| Li Q, Liang Y, Tong B, et al. Compensatory effects between Pinus massoniana and broadleaved tree species. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 3 (3): 183- 189. | |
| Pan P, Sun Y J, Ouyang X Z, et al. Factors affecting spatial variation in vegetation carbon density in Pinus massoniana Lamb. forest in subtropical China. Forests, 2019, 10 (10): 880. | |
| Radtke P J, Burkhart H E. A comparison of methods for edge-bias compensation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1998, 28 (6): 942- 945. | |
| Wen L, Lei P F, Xiang W H, et al. Soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in pure and mixed stands of Pinus massoniana and Cinnamomum camphora differing in stand age. Forest Ecology and Management, 2014, 328, 150- 158. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||