Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2024, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (1): 68-79.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20230138
Previous Articles Next Articles
Junhong Zhang1,Yang Wang1,Shengcai Zhou2,Xiaolin Wu3,Renchao Wu3,Qi Yang1,Yuting Zhang1,Zaikang Tong1,*()
Received:
2023-04-06
Online:
2024-01-25
Published:
2024-01-29
Contact:
Zaikang Tong
E-mail:zktong@zjfc.edu.cn
CLC Number:
Junhong Zhang,Yang Wang,Shengcai Zhou,Xiaolin Wu,Renchao Wu,Qi Yang,Yuting Zhang,Zaikang Tong. Genetic Structure Analysis and Core Germplasm Collection Construction of Phoebe bournei Populations[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2024, 60(1): 68-79.
Table 1
Information of P. bournei germplasm resources"
群体 Population | 地理来源 Geographic source | 家系 Family | 种质数量 Sample size |
1 福建北部 Northern Fujian | 政和Zhenghe | 13, 14, 15, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88 | 18 |
建瓯Jian’ou | 10, 29, 30, 31, 32 | 5 | |
南平Nanping | 124, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208 | 7 | |
浦城Pucheng | 67, 68, 69 | 3 | |
武夷山Wuyishan | 2, 89, 90, 91 | 4 | |
松溪Songxi | 3, 4, 12, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 118, 119, 121, 122, 123 | 26 | |
2 福建中部 Central Fujian | 三明Sanming | 5, 6, 7, 196, 197, 198 | 6 |
尤溪Youxi | 46 | 1 | |
沙县Shaxian | 8, 9, 71, 72, 73, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98 | 12 | |
泰宁Taining | 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66 | 10 | |
将乐Jiangle | 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56 | 10 | |
明溪Mingxi | 43, 44, 45 | 3 | |
永安Yong’an | 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 10 | |
3 福建南部 Southern Fujian | 武平Wuping | 199, 200, 201, 202 | 4 |
4 广西北部 Northern Guangxi | 龙胜Longsheng | 21, 22, 229 | 3 |
兴安Xing’an | 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 | 5 | |
三江Sanjiang | 20 | 1 | |
5 湖南西部 Western Hunan | 邵阳Shaoyang | 184, 185, 186 | 3 |
永州Yongzhou | 192, 193, 194, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 228 | 19 | |
6 湖南东部 Eastern Hunan | 炎陵Yanling | 181, 182, 183 | 3 |
7 江西北部 Northern Jiangxi | 上饶Shangrao | 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180 | 13 |
8 江西南部 Southern Jiangxi | 赣州Ganzhou | 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167 | 12 |
吉安Ji’an | 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155 | 23 | |
遂川Suichuan | 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144 | 8 | |
9 浙江南部 Southern Zhejiang | 庆元Qingyuan | 191, 225, 226, 227 | 4 |
松阳Songyang | 187, 188, 189, 190 | 4 | |
泰顺Taishun | 209 | 1 |
Table 2
The information of 33 pairs of SSR primers"
引物 Primer | 重复基元 Repeat motifs | 上游引物 Forward primer sequence (5’-3’) | 下游引物 Reverse primer sequence (5’-3’) | 预计产物长度 Size/bp |
E-MN3 | (TGC)6 | TTGGTGGTGATAAGGGTGGT | TCAAAGGAAGAAAGCGCAAG | 154 |
E-MN7 | (CAA)5 | GTAGGGAAGGTGTTGCTGGT | TCTCAAATGCAGATGCCGTA | 203 |
E-MN8 | (GTT)6 | TTTCCACCACCCAAATTCAT | ATGGTCTCCAAGACGACGAC | 217 |
E-MN11 | (ACACAA)4 | TAAGCAACGAATCCATGCAA | TCCTTCCATCTGCGTCTTTT | 178 |
E-MN17 | (GGCTGG)4 | CCATGCGTCTGAGCAGATTA | GGTCCACTGATGCTGGCTAT | 241 |
E-MN19 | (TG)7tatc(TATG)5 | TGGACATGCACAAACCATCT | GGCAAAGAAAGGCATTGAAG | 245 |
E-MN21 | (AAT)6 | TCACCAGCCCCATCTTATTC | TGCCAACACTCATCCCATTA | 159 |
E-MN25 | (AGTGC)4 | ATTCATCGAAGCTGGATTGG | CATCCCATCGTCCCAAATAC | 198 |
E-MN35 | (TGT)7 | ATCCTCGTCCTCATCCTCCT | GAAATCATCGCAGAAGCACA | 250 |
E-MN46 | (ATT)6 | TGTCGCGTGTCAAGCACTAT | CCATCTGCAATTCTCGTCAG | 225 |
E-MN47 | (AAGGGA)4 | TTGTCGGGTCAGACTCAGTG | CTTTCCATTTCCCCCATTCT | 154 |
E-MN54 | (TGA)6 | CCCCAACATGGTTAGGAAGA | TGTGGAACAGTGGAAGTGGA | 189 |
E-MN58 | (TCT)5 | CCATCTCTCCACGATCCCTA | TAATTTCAACGAGGGCCAAG | 213 |
E-MN62 | (AGA)5 | AACAGCGGAAAGAATCAACG | TTTCACTTCGGCTTCGTCTT | 229 |
E-MN66 | (GGA)6 | CTTGAGGGTTTGTCGTTGGT | TGATGGAGTTTGCTGAGGTG | 213 |
E-MN71 | (ACA)5 | GGTAAGGCCTCTCCTCTGCT | GTTACTCGGGCGATGACAAT | 203 |
E-MN88 | (GCT)5 | GCAAACACTCTCCCACCATT | CCCACTCTTGTCTTGCTTCC | 202 |
E-MN89 | (GAA)5 | GGATCGGAAGGTGAAGATGA | CTCCGAAACGTTCCTATCCA | 210 |
E-MN90 | (GAA)5 | GAGAACCCATGGTTGGTTTG | TTGCACCCTCGATTCTCTCT | 208 |
G-MN102 | (GATAAG)5 | TTGCATCGTTGAGGAGCTGT | CAGAGTCGCCAATGTCGTCT | 169 |
G-MN114 | (CATT)5 | ATGCTGACCGTGGTTCGATT | CATGTGAGCCCATTCCAGGT | 208 |
G-MN120 | (CCGGG)5 | GGTGTGTCCAAGAGGTGTGT | ACTACCAACCGTGTGCATGT | 260 |
G-MN134 | (CATATC)5 | TGTGCTGTATTTGGTCGCCT | CGATGGCTGGAACTGTGGAT | 256 |
G-MN140 | (TGGTTC)5 | TGACCTCGGGAAGACACTCT | ATCTAGTAGGCAGCATGCGC | 215 |
G-MN145 | (AAGAGC)6 | GAGGGAGCCATCCTTGATCG | TCCCTTGAGGAGACCAGGTT | 198 |
G-MN146 | (CCGAA)5 | TGCGGTGATGGAGAAAGCAT | TGACAGATCCAAGGCAGCTG | 195 |
G-MN150 | (TCA)6 | GAGCGATCCAAAGCCAATGC | ACCAAACTGCTCAGGGATCG | 211 |
G-MN157 | (AACCG)5 | TGAGACCGAAAGCTTGGGAC | ACAACATGCATTTGGTGGGC | 242 |
G-MN161 | (GCAC)5 | CAGCTCCCACCTCAAAACCT | GCGTCTGACTTGCAACTGTG | 227 |
G-MN168 | (ATGAGG)6 | GTTGAAGAAGTCGGGGGAGG | GACTCCATTTCGCATTCGGC | 165 |
G-MN174 | (CTG)7 | ACACCATTACTGCTGCTGCT | AGTACAGCCCATTGTCACCG | 207 |
G-MN186 | (CTCCAA)5 | GAGCCGCACTTCAACTAGGT | GGAGTGGGAGTTGGAGTTGG | 195 |
G-MN191 | (TATCAC)5 | GATGGCAGCTTCAACTTGGC | TCCCCAACTAGGTGGGATGT | 237 |
Table 3
The genetic diversity of P. bournei germplasm resources"
位点 Locus | Na | Ne | Ho | He | I | H | PIC |
E-MN3 | 4.000 | 2.273 | 0.351 | 0.561 | 0.934 | 0.560 | 0.466 |
E-MN7 | 3.000 | 2.417 | 0.002 | 0.587 | 0.986 | 0.586 | 0.521 |
E-MN8 | 4.000 | 2.589 | 0.485 | 0.614 | 1.073 | 0.614 | 0.535 |
E-MN11 | 3.000 | 1.646 | 0.181 | 0.393 | 0.663 | 0.392 | 0.337 |
E-MN17 | 3.000 | 2.142 | 0.000 | 0.534 | 0.821 | 0.533 | 0.424 |
E-MN19 | 3.000 | 2.306 | 0.647 | 0.567 | 0.908 | 0.566 | 0.470 |
E-MN21 | 3.000 | 2.077 | 0.000 | 0.519 | 0.798 | 0.519 | 0.412 |
E-MN25 | 4.000 | 2.980 | 0.238 | 0.665 | 1.202 | 0.664 | 0.601 |
E-MN35 | 4.000 | 2.379 | 0.551 | 0.580 | 1.002 | 0.580 | 0.510 |
E-MN46 | 4.000 | 2.320 | 0.320 | 0.570 | 0.935 | 0.569 | 0.474 |
E-MN47 | 4.000 | 2.234 | 0.304 | 0.553 | 0.905 | 0.552 | 0.457 |
E-MN54 | 3.000 | 2.166 | 0.054 | 0.539 | 0.897 | 0.538 | 0.466 |
E-MN58 | 5.000 | 2.574 | 0.454 | 0.612 | 1.060 | 0.612 | 0.537 |
E-MN62 | 3.000 | 2.950 | 0.358 | 0.662 | 1.090 | 0.661 | 0.587 |
E-MN66 | 4.000 | 2.461 | 0.177 | 0.594 | 1.004 | 0.594 | 0.523 |
E-MN71 | 3.000 | 2.996 | 0.424 | 0.667 | 1.098 | 0.666 | 0.592 |
E-MN88 | 3.000 | 2.633 | 0.233 | 0.621 | 1.029 | 0.620 | 0.547 |
E-MN89 | 3.000 | 1.977 | 0.318 | 0.495 | 0.738 | 0.494 | 0.385 |
E-MN90 | 3.000 | 2.325 | 0.332 | 0.571 | 0.920 | 0.570 | 0.478 |
G-MN102 | 4.000 | 1.329 | 0.000 | 0.248 | 0.543 | 0.248 | 0.237 |
G-MN114 | 4.000 | 1.142 | 0.005 | 0.124 | 0.269 | 0.124 | 0.118 |
G-MN120 | 2.000 | 1.200 | 0.000 | 0.167 | 0.307 | 0.167 | 0.153 |
G-MN134 | 10.000 | 4.677 | 0.699 | 0.787 | 1.774 | 0.786 | 0.759 |
G-MN140 | 3.000 | 1.437 | 0.000 | 0.305 | 0.562 | 0.304 | 0.275 |
G-MN145 | 3.000 | 1.768 | 0.285 | 0.435 | 0.767 | 0.434 | 0.390 |
G-MN146 | 4.000 | 1.643 | 0.009 | 0.392 | 0.765 | 0.391 | 0.361 |
G-MN150 | 3.000 | 1.204 | 0.047 | 0.170 | 0.353 | 0.169 | 0.160 |
G-MN157 | 2.000 | 1.978 | 0.000 | 0.495 | 0.688 | 0.494 | 0.372 |
G-MN161 | 3.000 | 1.191 | 0.115 | 0.161 | 0.347 | 0.160 | 0.153 |
G-MN168 | 3.000 | 1.158 | 0.000 | 0.136 | 0.284 | 0.136 | 0.129 |
G-MN174 | 10.000 | 1.444 | 0.268 | 0.308 | 0.723 | 0.307 | 0.295 |
G-MN186 | 9.000 | 4.090 | 0.355 | 0.756 | 1.623 | 0.756 | 0.718 |
G-MN191 | 4.000 | 1.532 | 0.169 | 0.348 | 0.678 | 0.347 | 0.319 |
平均值Mean | 3.939 | 2.159 | 0.224 | 0.477 | 0.841 | 0.476 | 0.417 |
Table 4
The genetic diversity of nine P. bournei populations"
群体Population | Na | Ne | Ho | He | H | I |
福建北部 Northern Fujian | 3.636 | 2.049 | 0.227 | 0.462 | 0.460 | 0.797 |
福建南部Southern Fujian | 2.455 | 1.968 | 0.280 | 0.474 | 0.444 | 0.713 |
福建中部Central Fujian | 3.394 | 1.912 | 0.233 | 0.423 | 0.421 | 0.723 |
广西北部Northern Guangxi | 2.758 | 1.830 | 0.157 | 0.421 | 0.409 | 0.692 |
湖南东部Eastern Hunan | 2.364 | 1.924 | 0.263 | 0.408 | 0.374 | 0.623 |
湖南西部Western Hunan | 3.455 | 2.287 | 0.248 | 0.516 | 0.510 | 0.892 |
江西北部Northern Jiangxi | 2.242 | 1.621 | 0.218 | 0.313 | 0.306 | 0.504 |
江西南部Southern Jiangxi | 2.788 | 1.957 | 0.201 | 0.406 | 0.404 | 0.674 |
浙江南部Southern Zhejiang | 3.000 | 2.155 | 0.226 | 0.471 | 0.458 | 0.786 |
平均值Mean | 2.899 | 1.967 | 0.228 | 0.433 | 0.421 | 0.712 |
Table 5
Comparison of genetic diversity under various sampling ratios"
取样比例 Sampling ratio | 种质数目 Germplasm number | Na | Ne | Ho | He | I | H |
50 | 213 | 3.849 | 2.093 | 0.242 | 0.461 | 0.805 | 0.459 |
45 | 191 | 3.849 | 2.102 | 0.245 | 0.463 | 0.809 | 0.461 |
40 | 170 | 3.849 | 2.123 | 0.245 | 0.467 | 0.818 | 0.466 |
35 | 149 | 3.849 | 2.141 | 0.249 | 0.475 | 0.833 | 0.474 |
30 | 128 | 3.788 | 2.172 | 0.247 | 0.482 | 0.844 | 0.480 |
25 | 106 | 3.758 | 2.198 | 0.254 | 0.491 | 0.858 | 0.489 |
20 | 85 | 3.636 | 2.241 | 0.261 | 0.501 | 0.869 | 0.498 |
15 | 64 | 3.606 | 2.168 | 0.268 | 0.491 | 0.846 | 0.487 |
10 | 43 | 3.606 | 2.204 | 0.277 | 0.497 | 0.857 | 0.491 |
Table 6
Comparison of genetic diversity of original, core and reserved germplasms"
群体 Population | Na | Ne | Ho | He | I | H |
原始种质Original germplasms | 3.939 | 2.159 | 0.224 | 0.477 | 0.841 | 0.476 |
核心种质Core germplasms | 3.636 | 2.241 | 0.261 | 0.501 | 0.869 | 0.498 |
保留率Retention rate(%) | 92.318 | 103.803 | 116.652 | 105.052 | 103.341 | 104.664 |
保留种质Reserved germplasms | 3.909 | 2.122 | 0.215 | 0.465 | 0.819 | 0.465 |
保留率Retention rate(%) | 99.241 | 98.300 | 95.804 | 97.568 | 97.360 | 97.647 |
Table 7
The t test of the genetic diversity parameters between core collection and original collection"
参数 Parameters | 群体 Population | 均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation | 均值差值 Mean difference | t | P |
Na | 原始种质Original germplasms | 3.939 | 1.952 | 0.303 | 0.690 | 0.493 |
核心种质Core germplasms | 3.636 | 1.597 | ||||
Ne | 原始种质Original germplasms | 2.159 | 0.803 | ?0.082 | ?0.412 | 0.681 |
核心种质Core germplasms | 2.241 | 0.821 | ||||
Ho | 原始种质Original germplasms | 0.224 | 0.205 | ?0.038 | ?0.716 | 0.477 |
核心种质Core germplasms | 0.261 | 0.223 | ||||
He | 原始种质Original germplasms | 0.477 | 0.185 | ?0.024 | ?0.535 | 0.595 |
核心种质Core germplasms | 0.501 | 0.185 | ||||
I | 原始种质Original germplasms | 0.841 | 0.339 | ?0.028 | ?0.329 | 0.743 |
核心种质Core germplasms | 0.869 | 0.363 | ||||
H | 原始种质Original germplasms | 0.476 | 0.185 | ?0.022 | ?0.484 | 0.630 |
核心种质Core germplasms | 0.498 | 0.184 |
Table 8
The distribution of core collection in P. bournei"
类群 Group | 分布区域 Distribution area | 地理来源 Geographic source | 家系 Family |
第一类群 (蓝色部分) The first group (blue part) | 1 福建北部Northern Fujian | 政和 Zhenghe | 13, 87 |
建瓯Jian’ou | 29, 31 | ||
南平Nanping | 203, 204, 206, 207, 208 | ||
松溪Songxi | 3, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 111, 112, 114, 115, 116, 118, 119, 122 | ||
2 福建中部Central Fujian | 三明Sanming | 5, 7, 196(2), 197, 198 | |
沙县Shaxian | 9, 73, 94, 97 | ||
将乐Jiangle | 51 | ||
明溪Mingxi | 43 | ||
第二类群 (绿色部分) The second group (green part) | 3 福建南部Southern Fujian | 武平Wuping | 200, 201, 202 |
5 湖南西部Western Hunan | 邵阳Shaoyang | 184, 186 | |
永州Yongzhou | 192, 193, 210, 211, 212, 213, 215, 216, 217, 218(2), 219, 220, 222, 223(2), 228 | ||
6 湖南东部Eastern Hunan | 炎陵Yanling | 181, 182, 183(2) | |
8 江西南部Southern Jiangxi | 吉安Ji’an | 130, 147, 151 | |
遂川Suichuan | 138, 141 | ||
9 浙江南部Southern Zhejiang | 庆元Qingyuan | 191(2), 225, 226, 227(2) | |
松阳Songyang | 187, 188(2), 190 | ||
泰顺Taishun | 209 | ||
第三群类 (红色部分) The third group (red part) | 4 广西北部Northern Guangxi | 兴安Xing’an | 26 |
三江Sanjiang | 20 | ||
7 江西北部Northern Jiangxi | 上饶Shangrao | 168, 172 |
陈 存, 丁昌俊, 张 静, 等. 美洲黑杨群体结构分析及核心种质库构建. 林业科学, 2020, 56 (9): 67- 76.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20200908 |
|
Chen C, Ding C J, Zhang J, et al. Population structure analysis and core collection construction of Populus deltoides. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56 (9): 67- 76.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20200908 |
|
冯一宁, 李因刚, 祁 铭, 等. 基于SSR标记的福建省闽楠代表性群体遗传多样性分析. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46 (4): 102- 108. | |
Feng Y N, Li Y G, Qi M, et al. Genetic diversity analyses of Phoebe bournei representative populations in Fujian Province based on SSR markers. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2022, 46 (4): 102- 108. | |
黄雨芹, 尹光天, 杨锦昌, 等. 基于SSR分子标记的闽楠(Phoebe bournei)核心种质的构建. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18 (8): 2641- 2648. | |
Huang Y Q, Yin G T, Yang J C, et al. Developing a mini core germplasm of Phoebe bournei based on SSR molecular marker. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2020, 18 (8): 2641- 2648. | |
李洪果, 许基煌, 杜红岩, 等. 基于等位基因最大化法初步构建杜仲核心种质. 林业科学, 2018, 54 (2): 42- 51.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20180205 |
|
Li H G, Xu J H, Du H Y, et al. Preliminary construction of core collection of Eucommia ulmoides based on allele number maximization strategy. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54 (2): 42- 51.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20180205 |
|
李魁鹏, 陈仕昌, 程 琳, 等. 基于SSR标记构建广西杉木核心种质. 广西科学, 2021, 28 (5): 511- 519.
doi: 10.13656/j.cnki.gxkx.20211203.003 |
|
Li K P, Chen S C, Cheng L, et al. Construction of core germplasm of Cunninghamia lanceolata in Guangxi based on SSR markers. Guangxi Sciences, 2021, 28 (5): 511- 519.
doi: 10.13656/j.cnki.gxkx.20211203.003 |
|
刘 丹. 2019. 闽楠种质资源遗传多样性的SSR分析. 福州: 福建农林大学. | |
Liu D. 2019. Genetic diversity of germplasm resources revealed by SSR in Phoebe bourne. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University. [in Chinese] | |
刘 军, 姜景民, 陈益泰, 等. 闽楠种子轻基质容器育苗及优良家系选择. 西北林学院学报, 2011, 26 (6): 70- 73,228. | |
Liu J, Jiang J M, Chen Y T, et al. Cultural techniques of container seedlings with light medium and family selection for Phoebe bournei. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2011, 26 (6): 70- 73,228. | |
明 军, 张启翔, 兰彦平. 梅花品种资源核心种质构建. 北京林业大学学报, 2005, 27 (2): 65- 69.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2005.02.013 |
|
Ming J, Zhang Q X, Lan Y P. Core collection of Prunus mume Sieb. et Zucc. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2005, 27 (2): 65- 69.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2005.02.013 |
|
潘英华, 徐志健, 梁云涛. 广西普通野生稻群体结构解析与核心种质构建. 植物遗传资源学报, 2018, 19 (3): 498- 509.
doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2018.03.015 |
|
Pan Y H, Xu Z J, Liang Y T. Genetic structure and core collection of common wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff. ) in Guangxi. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2018, 19 (3): 498- 509.
doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2018.03.015 |
|
申 展, 马履一, 敖 妍, 等. 基于SSR标记的文冠果遗传多样性分析及核心种质构建. 分子植物育种, 2017, 15 (8): 3341- 3350.
doi: 10.13271/j.mpb.015.003341 |
|
Shen Z, Ma L Y, Ao Y, et al. Analysis of the genetic diversity and construction of core collection of Xanthoceras sorbifolia Bunge. using microsatellite marker data. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2017, 15 (8): 3341- 3350.
doi: 10.13271/j.mpb.015.003341 |
|
孙荣喜. 2017. 中国枫香树遗传多样性及谱系地理研究. 北京: 中国林业研究科学院. | |
Sun R X. 2017. Genetic diversity and phylogeography of Liquidambar formosana Hance in China. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry. [in Chinese] | |
王 雪, 高 暝, 吴立文, 等. 峨眉山地区杨叶木姜子群体遗传多样性研究. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20 (2): 359- 369.
doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20180812001 |
|
Wang X, Gao M, Wu L W, et al. A study on population genetic diversity among Litsea populifolia (Hemsl.) gamble in mount Emei area. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2019, 20 (2): 359- 369.
doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20180812001 |
|
吴大荣, 王伯荪. 濒危树种闽楠种子和幼苗生态学研究(英文). 生态学报, 2011, 21 (11): 1751- 1760. | |
Wu D R, Wang B S. Seed and seedling ecology of the endangered Phoebe bournei (Lauraceae). Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 21 (11): 1751- 1760. | |
吴大荣, 朱政德. 福建省罗卜岩自然保护区闽楠种群结构和空间分布格局初步研究. 林业科学, 2003, 39 (1): 23- 30.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2003.01.004 |
|
Wu D R, Zhu Z D. Preliminary study on structure and spatial distribution pattern of Phoebe bournei in Luo Boyan nature reserve in Fujian Province. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2003, 39 (1): 23- 30.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2003.01.004 |
|
徐海明, 邱英雄, 胡 晋, 等. 不同遗传距离聚类和抽样方法构建作物核心种质的比较. 作物学报, 2004, 30 (9): 932- 936.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2004.09.016 |
|
Xu H M, Qiu Y X, Hu J, et al. Methods of constructing core collection of crop germplasm by comparing different genetic distances, cluster methods and sampling strategies. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2004, 30 (9): 932- 936.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2004.09.016 |
|
杨汉波, 张 蕊, 王帮顺, 等. 基于SSR标记的木荷核心种质构建. 林业科学, 2017, 53 (6): 37- 46.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20170605 |
|
Yang H B, Zhang R, Wang B S, et al. Construction of core collection of Schima superba based on SSR molecular markers. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53 (6): 37- 46.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20170605 |
|
杨欣超, 张凯权, 王 静, 等. 基于SSR分子标记的刺槐遗传多样性分析及核心种质的构建. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18 (9): 3086- 3097.
doi: 10.13271/j.mpb.018.003086 |
|
Yang X C, Zhang K Q, Wang J, et al. Analysis of genetic diversity and construction of core collections of black locust based on SSR markers. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2020, 18 (9): 3086- 3097.
doi: 10.13271/j.mpb.018.003086 |
|
张春雨, 陈学森, 张艳敏, 等. 采用分子标记构建新疆野苹果核心种质的方法. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42 (2): 597- 604.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2009.02.026 |
|
Zhang C Y, Chen X S, Zhang Y M, et al. A method for constructing core collection of Malus sieversii using molecular markers. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42 (2): 597- 604.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2009.02.026 |
|
张俊红, 黄华宏, 童再康, 等. 光皮桦6个南方天然群体的遗传多样性. 生物多样性, 2010, 18 (3): 233- 240.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2010.233 |
|
Zhang J H, Huang H H, Tong Z K, et al. Genetic diversity in six natural populations of Betula luminifera from southern China. Biodiversity Science, 2010, 18 (3): 233- 240.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2010.233 |
|
郑 健, 郑勇奇, 张川红, 等. 花楸树天然群体的遗传多样性研究. 生物多样性, 2008, 16 (6): 562- 569.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-0094.2008.06.006 |
|
Zheng J, Zheng Y Q, Zhang C H, et al. Genetic diversity in natural populations of Sorbus pohuashanensis. Biodiversity Science, 2008, 16 (6): 562- 569.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-0094.2008.06.006 |
|
Belaj A, Rosa R, Lorite I J, et al. Usefulness of a new large set of high throughput EST-SNP markers as a tool for olive germplasm collection management. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 9, 1320.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01320 |
|
Brown A. 1989. Core collections: a practical approach to genetic resource management. Genome, 31: 818-824. | |
Castelán P M, Cortés-Cruz M, Mendoza-Castillo M D C, et al. Diversity and genetic structure inferred with microsatellites in natural populations of Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco (Pinaceae) in the central region of Mexico. Forests, 2019, 10 (2): 101.
doi: 10.3390/f10020101 |
|
Charters Y M, Robertson A, Wilkinson M J, et al. PCR analysis of oilseed rape cultivars (Brassica napus L. ssp. oleifera) using 5'-anchored simple sequence repeat (SSR) primers. Theoretical & Applied Genetics, 1996, 92 (3): 442- 447. | |
Ding Y J, Zhang J H, Lu Y F, et al. Development of EST-SSR markers and analysis of genetic diversity in natural populations of endemic and endangered plant Phoebe chekiangensis. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 2015, 63, 183- 189.
doi: 10.1016/j.bse.2015.10.008 |
|
Diwan N, Mcintosh M S, Bauchan G R. Methods of developing a core collection of annual Medicago species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1995, 90 (5): 755- 761. | |
Doyle J. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemistry, 1987, 19 (1): 11- 13. | |
Frankel O H, Brown A. 1984. Plant genetic resources today: a critical appraisal//Holden J H W, Williams J T. eds. Crop genetic resources: conservation and evaluation. London: George Allen and Unwin, 249–257. | |
Gresshoff P M. 1991. Fast and sensitive silver staining of DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Analytical Biochemistry, 196(1): 80–83. | |
Hamrick J L. 1989. Allozyme diversity in plant species//Brown H D, Clegg M T, Kahler A L, et al. eds. Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, 43–63. | |
Hamrick J L, Godt M J W, Sherman-Broyles S L. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New Forests, 1992, 6 (1): 95- 124. | |
Han X, Zhang J H, Han S, et al. The chromosome-scale genome of Phoebe bournei reveals contrasting fates of terpene synthase (TPS)-a and TPS-b subfamilies. Plant Communications, 2022, 3 (6): 100410.
doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100410 |
|
Hu J, Zhu J, Xu H M. Methods of constructing core collections by stepwise clustering with three sampling strategies based on the genotypic values of crops. Theoretical & Applied Genetics, 2000, 101 (1): 264- 268. | |
Kang C W, Kim S Y, Lee S W, et al. Selection of a core collection of Korean sesame germplasm by a stepwise clustering method. Breeding Science, 2006, 56 (1): 85- 91.
doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.56.85 |
|
Pearse D E, Crandall K A. Beyond FST: analysis of population genetic data for conservation. Conservation Genetics, 2004, 5 (5): 585- 602.
doi: 10.1007/s10592-003-1863-4 |
|
Rubio-Moraga A, Candel-Perez D, Lucas-Borja M E, et al. Genetic diversity of Pinus nigra Arn. populations in southern Spain and northern Morocco revealed by inter-simple sequence repeat profiles. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2012, 13 (5): 5645- 5658.
doi: 10.3390/ijms13055645 |
|
Shi X M, Qiang W, Mu C, et al. Genetic diversity and structure of natural Quercus variabilis population in China as revealed by microsatellites markers. Forests, 2017, 8 (12): 495.
doi: 10.3390/f8120495 |
|
Wang H X, Zhao S G, Gao Y, et al. A construction of the core-collection of Juglans regia L. based on AFLP molecular markers. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46 (23): 4985- 4995. | |
Wang P L, Su J X, Wu H Y, et al. Analysis of germplasm genetic diversity and construction of a core collection in Camellia oleifera C.Abel by integrating novel simple sequence repeat markers. Genetic Resources Crop Evolution, 2023, 70 (5): 1517- 1530.
doi: 10.1007/s10722-022-01519-y |
|
Wang Y, Ma X, Lu Y, et al. Assessing the current genetic structure of 21 remnant populations and predicting the impacts of climate change on the geographic distribution of Phoebe sheareri in southern China. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 846, 157391.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157391 |
|
Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, 1931, 16 (2): 97- 159. | |
Wuyun T N, Amo H, Xu J S, et al. Population structure of and conservation strategies for wild Pyrus ussuriensis maxim in China. PLoS One, 2015, 10 (8): e0133686.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133686 |
|
Yeh F C, Yang R C, Boyle T. 2000. PopGene32, Microsoft windows-based freeware for population genetic analysis, Version 1.32. | |
Zhou Q, Zhou P Y, Zou W T, et al. EST-SSR marker development based on transcriptome sequencing and genetic analyses of Phoebe bournei (Lauraceae). Molecular Biology Reports, 2021, 48 (3): 2201- 2208.
doi: 10.1007/s11033-021-06228-w |
|
Zhu Y Z, Liang D Y, Song Z J, et al. Genetic diversity analysis and core germplasm collection construction of Camellia oleifera based on fruit phenotype and SSR data. Genes (Basel), 2022, 13 (12): 2351.
doi: 10.3390/genes13122351 |
[1] | Xiaolei Ding,Qingtong Wang,Sixi Lin,Ruiwen Zhao,Yue Zhang,Jianren Ye. Analysis of Genetic Variations of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus Populations between Guangdong and Jiangsu Provinces with SNP Marker [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(8): 1-9. |
[2] | Yan Wang,Jinling Feng,Xiaohui Wu,Lanming Huang,Juan Wu,Yu Chen,Zhijian Yang. Effects of Fertilization on Photosynthetic Carbon Fixation of Phoebe bournei Seedlings [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(5): 40-52. |
[3] | Wenting Pan,Jianjun Sun,Qinqin Yuan,Lili Zhang,Kangqiao Deng,Yueqiao Li. Analysis of Genetic Diversity and Structure in Different Provenances of Liriodendron by RAD-seq Technique [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(4): 74-81. |
[4] | Miao Zhang,Shengcai Zhou,Mengjie Wu,Zaikang Tong,Xiao Han,Junhong Zhang,Longjun Cheng. Identification of the PbWRKY Gene Family and Its Expression Analysis under Deficiency of Phosphorus in Phoebe bournei [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(2): 133-147. |
[5] | Chaoqun Du,Xiaomei Sun,Yunhui Xie,Yimei Hou. Genetic Diversity of Larix kaempferi Populations with Different Levels of Improvement in Northern Subtropical Region [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(5): 68-76. |
[6] | Xiao Wang,Xiaoli Wei,Gaoyin Wu,Shengqun Chen. Effects of Different Nitrogen Forms and Supply on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Growth of Phoebe bournei Seedlings under Elevated CO2 Concentration [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(4): 173-181. |
[7] | Cun Chen,Changjun Ding,Jing Zhang,Bo Li,Yanguang Chu,Xiaohua Su,Qinjun Huang. Population Structure Analysis and Core Collection Construction of Populus deltoides [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(9): 67-76. |
[8] | Xia Li,Libao Wang,Yafeng Wen,Jun Lin,Xingtong Wu,Meiling Yuan,Yuan Zhang,Minqiu Wang,Xinyu Li. Genetic Diversity of Chinese Fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) Breeding Populations among Different Generations [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(11): 53-61. |
[9] | Ma Songmei, Wang Chuncheng, Sun Fangfang, Wei Bo, Nie Yingbin. Genetic Diversity of an Endangered Plant Amygdalus ledebouriana in Xinjiang [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(9): 71-80. |
[10] | Li Honguo, Chen Dazhen, Xu Jingshi, Liu Guangjin, Pang Xiaodong, Ye Jinhui, Mo Xiaowen, Chen Honghui. Phenotypic Diversity and Variation in Natural Populations of Erythrophleum fordii, an Endangered Plant Species [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(4): 69-83. |
[11] | Jin Ling, Liu Mingguo, Dong Shengjun, Wu Yueliang, Zhang Xin. Genetic Diversity and Fingerprints of 97 Armeniaca sibirica Clones Based on SSR Markers [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(7): 51-61. |
[12] | Bao Wenquan, Wuyun Tana, Du Hongyan, Li Tiezhu, Liu Huimin, Wang Lin, Bai Yu. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Amygdalus mira in the Tibet Plateau in China Based on SSR Markers [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(2): 30-41. |
[13] | Li Hongguo, Xu Jihuang, Du Hongyan, Wuyun Tana, Liu Panfeng, Du Qingxin. Preliminary Construction of Core Collection of Eucommia ulmoides Based on Allele Number Maximization Strategy [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(2): 42-51. |
[14] | Yang Hanbo, Zhang Rui, Wang Bangshun, Xu Zhaoyou, Zhou Zhichun. Construction of Core Collection of Schima superba Based on SSR Molecular Markers [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(6): 37-46. |
[15] | Yang Hanbo, Zhang Rui, Wang Bangshun, Xu Zhaoyou, Chen Huanwei, Zhou Zhichun. Analysis of Genetic Diversity in Schima superba Plus Tree Germplasms by SSR Markers [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(5): 43-53. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||