Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2024, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (1): 80-92.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20220886
Previous Articles Next Articles
Ze Li1,3(),Fangfang Ma1,3,Hui Zhang1,3,Chengrui Luo1,3,Yeyao Liu1,3,Xiaoqin Mi2,Lesheng Li3,Hanyu Shu1,3,Xiaofeng Tan1,3
Received:
2022-12-16
Online:
2024-01-25
Published:
2024-01-29
CLC Number:
Ze Li,Fangfang Ma,Hui Zhang,Chengrui Luo,Yeyao Liu,Xiaoqin Mi,Lesheng Li,Hanyu Shu,Xiaofeng Tan. Grafting Techniques of Tung Tree Seedlings with Hypocotyle Rootstocks and the Anatomical Structure[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2024, 60(1): 80-92.
Fig.1
Process of grafting with hypocotyl rootstocks of tung trees A: Graft rootstocks germinated after 30 days of seed sand storage; B: The rootstock of the hypocotyl of tung tree and scion have similar thickness; C: Align the rootstock and scion incisions after grafting; D: Tung tree seedlings ready for transplantation after grafting and binding."
Table 1
Effects of different species rootstock, grafting and binding methods on grafting survival rate of tung tree sprouts"
砧木物种 Rootstock species | 嫁接方式 Grafting method | 绑扎方式 Bandaging method | 成活率 Survival rate (%) | 生长情况 Growth status |
三年桐 Vernicia fordii | 劈接 Split | 铝箔片 Aluminum foil | 38.5 ± 1.5c | 伤口愈合慢,砧木伤口处容易长萌芽条 The wound heals slowly, and it is easy to sprout at the rootstock wound |
塑料膜 Plastic film | 88.3 ± 1.7a | 伤口愈合较好,后期生长快 The wound heals well and the grafting seedlings grow fast at the later stage | ||
合接 Bonding | 铝箔片 Aluminum foil | 46.7 ± 7.3bc | 接穗易失水,铝箔片易脱落,成活率低 The scion is easy to lose water, the aluminum foil is easy to fall off, and the survival rate is low | |
塑料膜 Plastic film | 86.7 ± 3.3a | 伤口愈合较好,后期接口容易断裂 The wound heals well, but the interface is easy to break later | ||
千年桐 Vernicia montana | 劈接 Split | 铝箔片 Aluminum foil | 31.7 ± 0.9c | 伤口愈合慢,砧木伤口处容易长萌芽条 The wound heals slowly, and it is easy to sprout at the rootstock wound |
塑料膜 Plastic film | 90.0 ± 7.7a | 生长较快,伤口愈合好 Growing faster, the wound heals well | ||
合接 Bonding | 铝箔片 Aluminum foil | 36.7 ± 10.1c | 接穗易失水,铝箔片易脱落,成活率低 The scion is easy to lose water, the aluminum foil is easy to fall off, and the survival rate is low | |
塑料膜 Plastic film | 56.7 ± 4.4b | 伤口愈合较好,后期接口容易断裂 The wound heals well, but the interface is easy to break later |
Fig.2
Growth of tung tree grafted seedlings with different grafting and binding methods A: The growing situation after 30 days of binding with plastic film for splitting graft; B: The growing situation after 30 days of binding with plastic film for bonding graft; C: The growth situation after 30 days of fixing with aluminum foil for splitting graft; D: The growth situation after 30 days of fixing with aluminum foil sheets for bonding graft. 以上均以千年桐作砧木嫁接1个月拍照。The above photos are all taken in one month after graft with millennium tung as the rootstock."
Fig.3
Effects of different lengths of upper and lower stem segments, petioles and incisions on grafting survival rate A: The different lengths of upper stem segments of the scion, from left to right: 0.5 cm, 1.0 cm, 1.5 cm; B: The different lengths of scion incisions, from left to right: 1.0 cm, 1.5 cm, 2.0 cm; C: The different lengths of the lower stem segments of the scion, from left to right: 2.0 cm, 2.5 cm, 3.0 cm; D: The different lengths of petioles, from left to right: 0.1 cm, 0.5 cm, 1.0 cm; E: Survival rate of grafted seedlings under different treatments of spike, petiole, and cut length. 图E中不同的小写字母代表上、下茎段、叶柄及切口不同长度处理下成活率差异显著(P < 0.05)。The different lowercase letters in the figure E represent significant differences (P<0.05) in survival under different lengths of upper and lower stem segments, petioles, and incisions."
Table 2
Effects of rootstocks under different treatments on grafting survival rate"
砧木劈接 切口长度 Cutting length of rootstock splitting/cm | 移栽高度 Transplanting height | 成活率 Survival rate (%) | 生长情况 Growth status |
1.0 | 嫁接口高于地面 Grafting wound higher than ground | 70.0 ± 8.7Ba | 伤口愈合快,但切面较短,易偏移,砧木接穗接合处容易断裂或变形 The wound heals quickly, but the section is short and easy to shift, and the rootstock scion junction is easy to break or deform |
嫁接口与地面平行 Grafting wound parallel to the ground | 60.0 ± 5.8BCab | 苗床积水时砧木接穗接合处整体易腐烂,导致成活率低 When the seedbed is flooded, the rootstock scion junction is generally perishable, resulting in low survival rate | |
嫁接口埋于地面 Grafting wound buried in the ground | 50.0 ± 7.6Cb | 雨天接穗容易腐烂,伤口易受虫蚁啃噬 The scion is easy to rot in rainy days, and the wound is easy to be eaten by insects | |
1.5 | 嫁接口高于地面 Grafting wound higher than ground | 96.7 ±3.3Aa | 伤口愈合快,切面长度适宜,接触面较多养分运输快,成活率高 The wound heals fast, the length of the section is suitable, the contact surface is more, nutrients transport faster, and the survival rate is high |
嫁接口与地面平行 Grafting wound parallel to the ground | 73.3 ± 3.3Bb | 苗床积水时砧木接穗接合处部分易腐烂,成活率较低 When the seedbed is flooded, part of the scion joint of the rootstock is easy to rot, and the survival rate is low | |
嫁接口埋于地面 Grafting wound buried in the ground | 70.0 ± 10.0Bb | 雨天接穗容易腐烂,伤口易受虫蚁啃噬 The scion is easy to rot in rainy days, and the wound is easy to be eaten by insects | |
2.0 | 嫁接口高于地面 Grafting wound higher than ground | 93.3 ± 1.7Aa | 伤口愈合快,愈伤组织发达,成活率高 The wound heals fast, the callus develops well, and the survival rate is high |
嫁接口与地面平行 Grafting wound parallel to the ground | 60.0 ± 2.9BCb | 伤口过长,苗床积水时砧木接穗接合处部分易腐烂,导致成活率低 When the wound is too long and the seedbed is flooded, part of the joint of the rootstock scion is perishable, resulting in low survival rate | |
嫁接口埋于地面 Grafting wound buried in the ground | 50.0 ± 2.9Cc | 雨天接穗容易腐烂,伤口易受虫蚁啃噬 The scion is easy to rot in rainy days, and the wound is easy to be eaten by insects |
Table 3
Effects of different grafting periods on survival rate, seedling height and ground diameter of tung tree seedlings with hypocotyl grafting"
嫁接时间 Grafting time | 成活率 Survival rate (%) | 生长天数Growth day/d | 苗高 Seedling height/cm | 地径 Ground diameter/mm | 生长情况 Growth status |
5月中旬 Mid May | 58.3±4.4C | 30 | 1.01±0.07Cc | 8.04±0.03Ac | 接穗木质化程度低、导致腋芽萌发率及成活率低 The low degree of lignification of scions leads to low germination rate and survival rate of axillary buds |
60 | 9.84±1.26Cb | 8.79±0.01Cb | 苗木长势差,伤口愈合缓慢 The seedlings grow poorly and the wound heals slowly | ||
90 | 34.25±1.58Ca | 12.63±0.31Ba | 苗高后期生长较快,但接口处愈伤组织生长慢 The seedling height grows faster at the later stage, but the callus at the interface grows slowly | ||
5月下旬 Late May | 80.0±3.9A | 30 | 0.95±0.19Cc | 8.65±0.45Ac | 腋芽萌发率高,成活率高 Axillary bud germination rate is high, high survival rate |
60 | 19.12±3.58Bb | 9.07±0.33Cb | 苗木生长较慢,长势一般 Seedlings grow slowly, with moderate growth | ||
90 | 45.84±4.90Ba | 11.15±0.46Ba | 苗木后期生长较快,愈伤组织生长较慢 The seedlings grow faster at the later stage, and the callus grows slower | ||
6月上旬 Early June | 88.3±4.4A | 30 | 6.19±0.74Ac | 9.50±0.67Ac | 腋芽前期萌发率高,生长快,成活率高 The axillary buds have high germination rate, fast growth and high survival rate in the early stage |
60 | 32.57±0.56Ab | 13.10±0.14Ab | 苗木生长迅速,长势旺盛 The seedlings grow rapidly and vigorously | ||
90 | 57.03±1.89Aa | 15.88±0.79Aa | 接口处被愈伤组织完全包裹,后期生长最快 The wound is completely wrapped by callus and grows fastest at the later stage | ||
7月中旬 Mid July | 75.0±5.8AB | 30 | 4.82±0.08Bc | 7.90±0.31Ac | 腋芽萌发率较高,伤口愈合较快 Axillary bud germination rate is higher, wound heals faster |
60 | 23.45±0.51Bb | 10.86±0.67Bb | 苗木生长迅速,长势较好,生长较快 The seedlings grow rapidly, growth is well and fast | ||
90 | 35.47±2.36Ca | 13.17±0.57Ba | 苗木后期生长较慢 The seedlings grow slowly at the later stage | ||
8月中旬 Mid August | 71.7±7.3AB | 30 | 0.95±0.07Cb | 9.08±0.61Ab | 腋芽萌发率较低,伤口愈合缓慢 The germination rate of axillary buds is low and the wound heals slowly |
60 | 8.94±1.18Ca | 11.76±0.58ABa | 苗木生长缓慢,长势差 Seedlings grow slowly and poorly | ||
90 | 8.94±1.18Da | 11.76±0.58Ba | 苗木进入休眠期停止生长 The seedlings stop growth during the dormancy period |
Table 4
Effect of different height of seedbed on the survival rate of grafting and the high ground diameter of seedlings"
苗床高度 Seedbed height/cm | 成活率 Survival rate (%) | 生长天数Growth day/d | 苗高 Seedling height/cm | 地径 Ground diameter/mm | 生长情况 Growth status |
5 | 62.2±7.8B | 30 | 0.83±0.06Bc | 8.20±0.52Ab | 苗床低易积水,伤口处易腐烂,成活率低 The low seedbed is easy to be flooded, the wound is easy to rot, and the survival rate is low |
60 | 12.97±1.87Bb | 8.88±0.17Ab | 伤口愈合缓慢,苗木长势差 Wound heals slowly, seedling grows poorly | ||
90 | 39.79±3.36Ba | 12.35±0.60Ba | 苗木进入速生期,生长较快,长势较好 The seedlings enter the fast-growing period, grow faster and better | ||
10 | 64.5±4.0AB | 30 | 1.14±0.02ABc | 8.13±0.15Ab | 苗床较低易积水,苗木根部易腐烂死亡,成活率低 The low seedling bed is easy to be flooded, the seedling root is easy to rot and die, and the survival rate is low |
60 | 7.64±0.56Cb | 9.38±0.36Aab | 伤口愈合较快,苗木长势较弱 The wound heals faster but the seedlings grow weaker | ||
90 | 31.98±0.39BCa | 10.82±0.54Ba | 苗木进入速生期,生长较快,长势较弱 The seedlings enter the fast-growing period, grow faster but weaker | ||
15 | 80.0±3.9A | 30 | 2.73±0.03Ac | 8.49±0.41Ab | 苗床高度适中,不易积水,腋芽萌发率高,伤口愈合快,成活率高 The moderate seedbed height is, not easy to be flooded, the germination rate of axillary buds is high, the wound heals fast, and the survival rate is high |
60 | 22.53±1.93Ab | 9.56±0.17Ab | 苗木生长较快,长势旺盛 The seedlings grow faster and vigorously | ||
90 | 57.45±3.02Aa | 17.17±0.40Aa | 苗木进入速生期,生长快且伤口已经完全愈合 The seedlings enter the fast-growing period, grow fast and the wounds are completely healed | ||
20 | 79.8±2.2A | 30 | 0.77±0.09Cc | 8.72±0.39Ab | 苗床过高,不蓄水,接穗成活后生长较慢 When seedling bed is too high, the water is not stored, and the scion grows slow after survival |
60 | 6.96±0.65Cb | 9.2±0.29Ab | 苗木生长缓慢,长势弱 The seedlings grow slowly and weakly | ||
90 | 30.94±2.40Ca | 11.16±0.44Ba | 苗床过高、降水少导致苗木后期干旱长势差 Too high seedbed and less precipitation lead to drought, and seedlings grow poorly at the later stage |
Fig.4
Growth status of tung tree grafted seedlings in different periods A: Axillary buds germinate in 5 days after the grafted seedlings are transplanted to the field; B: The overall growth status of seedlings after 10 days of grafting; C: Growth status of seedlings after 20 days of grafting; D: Wound heals after 25 days of grafting; E: Tung tree seedlings with fully healed wounds after grafting; F: The growth status of wounds after grafting with thinner scions; G: The overall growth of seedlings after 90 days of grafting; H: Wound healing status after 90 days of grafting; I: Growth status of tung tree seedlings with hypocotyl grafting after winter defoliation."
Fig.5
Wound healing and microstructure observation after transplanting of tung tree grafted seedlings A: Grafted seedlings of tung trees with hypocotyle rootstocks after 10 days of transplantation; B: Grafted seedlings of tung trees with hypocotyle rootstocks after 20 days of transplantation; C: Grafted seedlings of tung trees with hypocotyle rootstocks after 30 days of transplantation; D: Grafted seedlings of tung trees with hypocotyle rootstocks after 50 days of transplantation; E: Grafted seedlings of tung trees with hypocotyle rootstocks after 70 days of transplantation; F: Wound growth status of tung tree seedlings after 10 days of grafting with hypocotyle rootstocks; G: Wound growth status of tung tree seedlings after 20 days of grafting with hypocotyle rootstocks; H: Wound growth status of tung tree seedlings after 30 days of grafting with hypocotyle rootstocks; I: Wound growth status of tung tree seedlings after 50 days of grafting with hypocotyle rootstocks; J: Wound growth status of tung tree seedlings after 70 days of grafting with hypocotyle rootstocks; K: Microanatomy structure of the contact area between the rootstock and the scion after 10 days of wound growth from hypocotyle grafting; L: Microanatomy structure of the contact area between the rootstock and the scion after 20 days of wound growth from hypocotyle grafting; M: Microanatomy structure of the contact area between the rootstock and the scion after 30 days of wound growth from hypocotyle grafting; N: Microanatomy structure of the contact area between the rootstock and the scion after 50 days of wound growth from hypocotyle grafting; O: Microanatomy structure of the contact area between the rootstock and the scion after 70 days of wound growth from hypocotyle grafting. St:砧木Rootstock;Sc:接穗Scion;IL:嫁接隔离层Graft isolation layer."
程继先. 油桐嫁接技术试验浅析. 现代园艺, 2014, (17): 6- 8. | |
Cheng J X. Experimental analysis on grafting technology test of Vernicia fordii. Contemporary Horticulture, 2014, (17): 6- 8. | |
何 方, 张日清, 王承南. 2016. 中国油桐栽培学. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社. | |
He F, Zhang R Q, Wang C N. 2016. Chinese tung tree cultivation. Beijing: China Agricultural Science Press. [in Chinese] | |
胡观兴. 2020. 海南油茶芽苗砧嫁接与容器育苗技术研究. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学. | |
Hu G X. 2020. Study on Grafting of Camellia hainanica seedlings and container seedling. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry & Technology. [in Chinese] | |
黄瑞春, 谭晓风, 王承南, 等. 油桐种质资源库品比试验初步研究. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2011, 31 (9): 38- 41. | |
Huang R C, Tan X F, Wang C N, et al. Preliminary study on comparison genetic resources center in Vernicia fordii. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2011, 31 (9): 38- 41. | |
蒋小勇. 油茶芽苗砧嫁接育苗技术浅析. 南方农业, 2021, 15 (2): 60- 61. | |
Jiang X Y. Analysis on grafting seedling raising technology of Camellia oleifera bud rootstock. South China Agriculture, 2021, 15 (2): 60- 61. | |
蓝金宣, 梁文汇, 黄晓露, 等. 2021. 油桐扦插及其不定根形成的解剖观察. 中国农学通报. 37(19): 42-46. | |
Lan J X, Liang W H, Huang X L, et al. 2021. Anatomical observation on cutting propagation and adventitious root formation of Vernicia fordii. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 37(19): 42-46. [in Chinese] | |
李柏霖. 油桐嫁接技术. 农业与技术, 2018, 38 (8): 204. | |
Li B L. Grafting technology of Vernicia fordii. Agriculture and Technology, 2018, 38 (8): 204. | |
李景明, 陈 晓, 苟先涛, 等. 2015. 苦瓜嫁接苗密度栽培试验初报. 耕作与栽培, 207(S1): 20, 11. | |
Li J M, Chen X, Gou X T, et al. 2015. Preliminary study on planting density of grafted bitter gourd. Tillage and Cultivation, 207(S1): 20, 11. [in Chinese] | |
李明鹤. 芽苗砧嫁接. 林业科技通讯, 1979, (2): 34. | |
Li M H. Germinated seed grafting. Forest Science and Technology, 1979, (2): 34. | |
李晓波, 夏方山, 朱梦馨, 等. 贮藏年限对不同居群白羊草种子活力的影响. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2022, 43 (6): 88- 94. | |
Li X B, Xia F S, Zhu M X, et al. Effects of storage years on seed vigour of Bothriochloa ischaemum of different populations. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2022, 43 (6): 88- 94. | |
李 泽, 谭晓风, 卢 锟, 等. 干旱胁迫对两种油桐幼苗生长、气体交换及叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 生态学报, 2017, 37 (5): 1515- 1524. | |
Li Z, Tan X F, Lu K, et al. Influence of drought stress on the growth, leaf gas exchange, and chlorophyll fluorescence in two varieties of tung tree seedlings. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37 (5): 1515- 1524. | |
林 青, 吴玲利, 张 琳, 等. 油桐叶柄高效直接再生体系的建立. 植物生理学报, 2014, 50 (10): 1608- 1612. | |
Lin Q, Wu L L, Zhang L, et al. Establishment of highly efficient and direct regeneration system from petioles of tung tree (Vernicia fordii). Plant Physiology Journal, 2014, 50 (10): 1608- 1612. | |
林 青. 2016. 油桐和油茶离体器官再生体系的建立. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学. | |
Lin Q. 2016. Establishment of regeneration system of organ in vitro of Vernicia fordii and Camellia oleifera. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry & Technology. [in Chinese] | |
卢永艳, 吴运辉, 杨承荣, 等. 小果油茶良种苗木繁育技术. 林业科技通讯, 2020, (9): 93- 95. | |
Lu Y Y, Wu Y H, Yang C R, et al. Breeding techniques of Camellia meiocarpa seedlings. Forest Science and Technology, 2020, (9): 93- 95. | |
卯吉华, 贾代顺, 陈 福, 等. 珍稀濒危植物蒜头果芽苗砧嫁接技术体系研究. 西部林业科学, 2018, 47 (5): 39- 45, 68. | |
Mao J H, Jia D S, Chen F, et al. Hypocotyle grafting techniques of rare and endangered plant Malania oleifera. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2018, 47 (5): 39- 45, 68. | |
孟宪敏, 张 锋, 段韫丹, 等. 叶面喷施矮壮素对番茄嫁接愈合的调节作用. 西北植物学报, 2022, 42 (7): 1144- 1151.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2022.07.1144 |
|
Meng X M, Zhang F, Duan Y D, et al. Regulating effect of foliar spraying chlorocholine chloride on graft formation of tomato. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2022, 42 (7): 1144- 1151.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2022.07.1144 |
|
祁利潘, 李 越, 王 磊, 等. 马铃薯与枸杞嫁接愈合过程的解剖学观察. 园艺学报, 2022, 49 (4): 868- 874. | |
Qi L P, Li Y, Wang L, et al. Anatomical observation on the graft union between potato and wolfberry. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49 (4): 868- 874. | |
谭晓风. 油桐的生产现状及其发展建议. 经济林研究, 2006, 24 (3): 62- 64. | |
Tan X F. Status and suggestion on development of Vernicia fordii. Non-Wood Forest Research, 2006, 24 (3): 62- 64. | |
谭晓风, 蒋桂雄, 谭方友, 等. 我国油桐产业化发展战略调查研究报告. 经济林研究, 2011, 29 (3): 1- 7. | |
Tan X F, Jiang G X, Tan F Y, et al. Research report on industrialization development strategy of Vernicia fordii in China. Non-wood Forest Research, 2011, 29 (3): 1- 7. | |
谭晓风, 李 泽, 张 琳, 等. 油桐叶片愈伤组织诱导及植株再生. 植物生理学报, 2013, 49 (11): 1245- 1249. | |
Tan X F, Li Z, Zhang L, et al. Callus induction from leaves and plant regeneration of tung tree ( Vernicia fordii Hemsley). Plant Physiology Journal, 2013, 49 (11): 1245- 1249. | |
谭 旭, 于云飞, 王圣元, 等. 梨种苗“砧木春早播和断根移栽”繁育技术研究. 中国果树, 2022, 220 (2): 32- 37,110. | |
Tan X, Yu Y F, Wang S Y, et al. Propagation of pear nursery stocks through seed sowing in early spring and transplanting with pruned roots. China Fruits, 2022, 220 (2): 32- 37,110. | |
王宝龙, 徐君霞, 李明月, 等. 枫杨种子休眠与萌发特性研究. 森林工程, 2018, 34 (2): 11- 15. | |
Wang B L, Xu J X, Li M Y, et al. Research on seed dormancy and germination characteristics of Pterocarya stenoptera seeds. Forest Engineering, 2018, 34 (2): 11- 15. | |
吴光金, 林雪坚, 张宏业, 等. 千年桐抗枯萎病的研究. 中南林学院学报, 1988, 8 (1): 28- 34. | |
Wu G J, Lin X J, Zhang H Y, et al. Study on resistance to wilt of Aleurites montana. Journal of Central South Forestry University, 1988, 8 (1): 28- 34. | |
徐永杰, 周席华, 章承林, 等. 油桐春季嫁接技术. 林业科技开发, 2011, 25 (2): 112- 113. | |
Xu Y J, Zhou X H, Zhang C L, et al. Research on the grafting technique of Aleurites fordii in spring. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2011, 25 (2): 112- 113. | |
尤 超, 孙 锦. 育苗与移栽密度对油桃砧木生长的影响. 农学学报, 2014, 4 (8): 59- 62. | |
You C, Sun J. Effect of seedling and transplanting density on growth of Nectarine rootstock. Journal of Agriculture, 2014, 4 (8): 59- 62. | |
张姗姗, 陈益存, 汪阳东. 油桐的组织培养与快速繁殖. 植物生理学通讯, 2009, 45 (10): 1008. | |
Zhang S S, Chen Y C, Wang Y D. Tissue culture and rapid propagation of Vernicia fordii (Hemsl.) Airy-Shaw. Plant Physiology Newsletter, 2009, 45 (10): 1008. | |
赵加欣. 2020. 愈合期环境与西瓜接穗对嫁接苗根系生长和糖代谢的调控. 北京: 中国农业科学院. | |
Zhao J X. 2020. Regulation of healing environment and watermelon scion on root growth and sugar metabolism of grafted seedlings. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. [in Chinese] | |
赵自霞. 北缘产区油桐嫁接育苗技术. 安徽林业科技, 2017, 43 (3): 58- 59. | |
Zhao Z X. Grafting seedling technology of Vernicia fordii in north edge region. Anhui Forestry Science and Technology, 2017, 43 (3): 58- 59. | |
周幼成, 钟秋平, 李清平, 等. 千年桐半木质化春梢扦插繁殖及生根机理研究. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2020, 40 (8): 25- 36.
doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2020.08.004 |
|
Zhou Y C, Zhong Q P, Li Q P, et al. Study on cutting propagation and rooting mechanism of semilignified spring shoots of Vernicia montana. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2020, 40 (8): 25- 36.
doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2020.08.004 |
|
Devi P, DeVetter L, Kraft M, et al. 2022. Micrographic view of graft union formation between watermelon scion and squash rootstock. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13: 878289. | |
Gregory R, Anoop T, Pallavi S, et al. 2021. Monocotyledonous plants graft at the embryonic root–shoot interface. Nature, 602(7896): 280−286. | |
Kundariya H, Yang X D, Morton K, et al. 2020. MSH1-induced heritable enhanced growth vigor through grafting is associated with the RdDM pathway in plants, Nature Communications, 11(1): 5343−5343. | |
Li W, Fang C, Krishnan S, et al. Elevated auxin and reduced cytokinin contents in rootstocks improve their performance and grafting success. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2017, 15 (12): 1556- 1565.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.12738 |
|
Lin Q, Li Z, Zhang L, et al. High-efficiency regeneration of seedlings from hypocotyl explants of tung tree (Vernicia fordii). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 2016, 18 (2): 370- 376.
doi: 10.17957/IJAB/15.0097 |
|
Zhai L M, Wang X M, Tang D, et al. 2021. Molecular and physiological characterization of the effects of auxin-enriched rootstock on grafting. Horticulture Research, 8(1): 74. | |
Zhang F H. , Lu K, Gu Y Y, et al. 2020. Effects of low-temperature stress and brassinolide application on the photosynthesis and leaf structure of tung tree seedlings. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10: 1767. |
[1] | Xiaocheng Zhou, Tingting Huang, Yuan Li, Xiangxi Xiao, Hongru Zhu, Yunzhi Chen, Zhiqing Feng. A Method for Estimating Subtropical Forest Stock by Combining Remotely Sensed Forest Age Factors [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(4): 88-99. |
[2] | Zexin Guo,Zhongyue Hu,Cong Cao,Ping Liu. Stand-Level Models of Biomass and Carbon Stock for Major Forest Types in Guangdong [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(12): 37-50. |
[3] | He He,Ruirui Jia,Yu Fu,Yanyan Zhu,Lianggui Wang,Xiulian Yang. Physiological and Biochemical Traits of Grafted Seedlings of Catalpa bungei with Various Combinations of Rootstocks and Scions [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(10): 99-112. |
[4] | Huiling Tian,Jianhua Zhu,Xiao He,Xinyun Chen,Zunji Jian,Chenyu Li,Xueyuan Guo,Guosheng Huang,Wenfa Xiao. Projected Biomass Carbon Stock of Arbor Forest of Three Provinces in Northeastern China Based on Random Forest Model [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(4): 40-50. |
[5] | Zhongqiu Sun,Jinping Gao,Fayun Wu,Xianlian Gao,Yang Hu,Jianxin Gao. Estimating Forest Stock Volume via Small-Footprint LiDAR Point Cloud Data and Random Forest Algorithm [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(8): 68-81. |
[6] | Wenxin Zhang,Shaoshuai Yu,Guozhong Tian,He Wang,Zhengguang Ren,Shengjie Wang,Dezhi Kong,Yong Li,Caili Lin. Detection and Molecular Variation of Jujube Witches' Broom Phytoplasma in Resistant Jujube Scions Grafted on Diseased Root Stocks in Three Jujube Orchards [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(11): 49-58. |
[7] | Yue Liu,Lingzhi Xie,Yandong Zhang,Zhengquan Wang,Jiacun Gu. Responses of Fine Root Biomass to Diameters of and Distances to the Neighboring Trees of Fraxinus mandschurica Plantation with Different Stocking Densities [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(10): 15-22. |
[8] | Lihu Dong,Yongshuai Liu,Bo Song,Yifei Zhou,Fengri Li. Comparison of Individual Tree Carbon Estimation Approaches [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(4): 46-54. |
[9] | Jincui Wu,Jun Zhou,Yu Zhang,Xiaoyan Yu,Lei Shi,Lianghua Qi. Carbon Sequestration Value and Its Change of Phyllostachys edulis Forest: A Case Study of Fujian Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(4): 181-187. |
[10] | Zhou Naifu, Song Xiaobo, Zhang Junpei, Chang Yingying, Pei Dong. Histological Mechanism of Bud Grafting in Walnut [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(6): 37-43. |
[11] | Liu Bao, Wang Minhuang, Yu Zaipeng, Lin Sizu, Lin Kaimin. Characterization of Soil Respiration after Conversion from Natural Forest to Plantations in Central-Subtropical Area [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(4): 1-12. |
[12] | Liang Senmiao, Zhang Shuwen, Ren Haiying, Zheng Xiliang, Qi Xingjiang. The Interspecific Grafting and Phylogenetic Analysis of Myrica cerifera and Myrica rubra [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(4): 171-177. |
[13] | Wang He, Ren Zhengguang, Pan Yanping, Feng Shukuai, Lin Caili, Chang Enzhong, Yu Shaoshuai, Tian Guozhong. Determination of Individual Jujube Trees against Jujube Witches'-Broom Disease and Screening of Resistant Varieties from the Ancient Individual Jujube Trees Growing in Beijing [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(8): 124-132. |
[14] | Gu Zhanying, Yang Ruonan, Chen Hao. The Establishment of Isolation and Transient Transformation Methods of Protoplasts of Vernicia fordii Mesophyll Cells [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(1): 46-53. |
[15] | Tang Dan, Jiang Xibing, Gong Bangchu, Liu Tongxiang, Xu Yan, Wu Kaiyun. Early Selection of Interstocks for Improving Grafting Compatibility in Diospyros kaki ‘Fuyu’ [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(5): 54-62. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||