欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (7): 86-94.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190709

• 论文与研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于异速生长和理论生长方程的广东省木荷生物量动态预测

薛春泉1, 徐期瑚1, 林丽平1, 何潇2, 曹磊2, 李海奎2   

  1. 1. 广东省林业调查规划院 广州 510520;
    2. 中国林业科学研究院资源信息研究所 北京 100091
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-17 修回日期:2019-05-09 出版日期:2019-07-25 发布日期:2019-08-16
  • 基金资助:
    广东省林业科技专项“广东主要碳汇造林树种生物量模型研建”(2015-02);广东省林业科技创新平台建设项目“广东省碳汇计量监测创新平台建设”(2016CXPT03)。

Biomass Dynamic Predicting for Schima superba in Guangdong Based on Allometric and Theoretical Growth Equation

Xue Chunquan1, Xu Qihu1, Lin Liping1, He Xiao2, Cao Lei2, Li Haikui2   

  1. 1. Guangdong Institute of Forestry Inventory and Planning Guangzhou 510520;
    2. Research Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques, CAF Beijing 100091
  • Received:2018-07-17 Revised:2019-05-09 Online:2019-07-25 Published:2019-08-16

摘要: [目的]将异速生长方程与理论生长方程相结合,预测广东省木荷生物量动态,为广东省木荷林碳汇计量提供模型和方法,为其他树种碳汇计量提供可借鉴的方法学支持。[方法]基于实测样木生物量调查数据,包括40株树干解析资料,构建由胸径和年龄的理论生长方程以及地上生物量和胸径的异速生长方程组成的模型系,利用非线性度量误差联立方程组,在胸径生长速度分级情况下拟合模型参数;基于3期森林资源连续清查固定样地样木数据,对广东省木荷生物量动态进行预测。采用决定系数(R2)和均方根误差(RMSE)评价模型拟合效果,通过生物量存量估计误差和增量估计误差判断模型预测效果。[结果]在胸径生长速度分级情况下,理论生长方程中年龄对胸径的解释率达0.95以上,比不分级提高0.1663,均方根误差下降到1.97 cm,降低2.16 cm以上,预测胸径对地上生物量的解释率提高到近0.82;接近独立异速生物量模型中实测胸径对地上生物量的解释率达0.88以上,比不分级提高近0.30,均方根误差下降到51 kg左右,下降30 kg以上。在胸径生长速度不分级情况下,各期生物量存量估计误差变动幅度在-46.31%~77.45%之间,而分级情况下下降到-16.13%~7.06%;在尺度上,分级与不分级均呈相同规律,即单木误差小于林分误差、林分误差小于区域误差。不分级时,单木水平和区域尺度间的误差不大于10%,而分级时小于8%。不同间隔期生物量增量估计误差,不分级时估计值普遍偏大,在32.57%~115.45%之间,而分级时下降到-6.57%~15.77%之间,在单木尺度上不超过±10%;随着尺度增大,增量估计误差不断增加,不分级时单木水平和区域尺度间的误差介于10%~15%之间,分级时稳定在8%左右。[结论]对于理论生长方程和异速生长方程组成的模型系,分级可极大提高模型精度,减小预测估计误差;生长速度不分级时,仅利用胸径或年龄数据,分级时,则可利用2期胸径数据或1期胸径和年龄数据,就可预测未来生物量动态,简单方便,在森林资源连续清查和碳汇造林的碳汇量计量中具有极大应用价值,区域尺度上的估计误差也可基本满足精度要求。

关键词: 异速生长方程, 理论生长方程, 木荷, 生物量, 广东省, 动态预测

Abstract: [Objective] In order to predict the biomass dynamic for Schima superba in Guangdong, a method of model system of combining the theoretical growth equation and the allometric equation was proposed and fitted. The method will provide the method ological support to other tree species for measuring carbon sink.[Method] Based on the measuring biomass survey data of sample trees, including 40 large trees whose stem were analyzed, this paper established the model system from theoretical growth equation which related DBH (diameter at breast height) to age and allometric equation which related aboveground biomass to DBH. Using nonlinear error-in-variable simultaneous equations, the models were fitted and the parameters were estimated under the classificated parameters which described DHB' growth rate. Based on three periods data of the sample trees in the permanent sample plot in China national forestry inventory, biomass dynamics for Schima superba were predicted in Guangdong province. Determination coefficient (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) were used to evaluate the model and estimate error for biomass storage and increment were used to assess the prediction.[Result] By classificated parameters for DHB growth, the explanation of theoretical growth equation for DBH was more than 0.95, raised 0.166 3 than that of the model with fixed growth parameter, RMSE reduced above 2.16 to 1.97 cm. The explanation of aboveground biomass with predicted DBH was 0.82, improved 0.30 than that of the model with fixed growth parameter, closely to R2 of independent allometric model, and RMSE reduced more than 30 to 51 kg. The estimated errors for different biomass storages ranged from -46.31% to 77.45% by the model with fixed growth parameter, while the estimated errors reduced from -16.13% to -7.06% in the case of the model with classificated parameters. There was same law at different scales for the two models, the estimated error for single tree were lower than that for stand and the estimated error for stand was lower than that for region. The error difference between single tree and region were not greater than 10% by the model with fixed growth parameter, while it was lower than 8% by the model with classificated parameters. The estimated errors for biomass increment at different periods were generally larger which varied from 32.57% to 115.45% by the model with fixed growth parameter, while the errors reduced from -6.57% to 15.77%,even less than ±10% at tree level, by the model with classificated parameters. With enlarging of scale, the estimated errors increased, the error differences between single tree and region varied from 10% to 15% by the model with fixed growth parameter and the differences were relatively stable around 8% by the model with classificated parameters.[Conclusion] By means of the combination model system of theoretical growth equation and allometric equation, classification could significantly improve the model accuracy and reduce the estimated error for prediction. Only DBH or age in the case of the model with fixed growth parameter, two-stages DBH or DBH and age of same period in the case of with classificated parameters could be used to predict the biomass dynamic in the future. The method and models were easy to use and had a promising applicative value to the estimation of carbon sink national forestry inventory and afforestation of carbon sink,the estimated error at regional scale could basically satisfy the accuracy requirements.

Key words: allometric growth equation, theoretical growth equation, Schima superba, biomass, Guangdong Province, dynamic prediction

中图分类号: