台湾桤木林草复合模式土壤微生物量碳季节动态

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20130704

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在四川省丹棱县退耕还林地,设置台湾桤木+多花黑麦草(AL)与台湾桤木+扁穗牛鞭草(AH)2种林草模式,以台湾桤木自然模式(AN)为对照,研究土壤有机碳含量以及土壤微生物量碳含量的季节变化。结果表明: 随土层深度增加, 2种林草模式与对照土壤有机碳含量和土壤微生物量碳含量均呈现下降趋势,在下降幅度上均表现为台湾桤木+扁穗牛鞭草模式较缓慢,对照模式下降最快; 3种模式不同土层土壤有机碳含量从春季到冬季随季节变化均呈现"升-降-升"的变化趋势,夏季含量最高,秋季最低,但这种变化趋势在台湾桤木+扁穗牛鞭草模式下0~10和10~20 cm土层表现得并不明显; 而3种模式各土层土壤微生物量碳含量则表现出与土壤有机碳季节动态相反的变化趋势,即"降-升-降"的变化趋势,夏季最低,秋季最高; 2种林草模式与对照的土壤有机碳含量和土壤微生物量碳含量差异均达到极显著水平(P<0.01),其大小顺序均表现为台湾桤木+扁穗牛鞭草模式>台湾桤木+多花黑麦草模式>对照模式; 台湾桤木+扁穗牛鞭草、台湾桤木+多花黑麦草模式下土壤有机碳含量分别是对照模式的1.24~1.55和1.16~1.30倍,土壤微生物量碳含量分别是对照模式的1.50~2.95和1.23~1.80 倍。

关键词: 台湾桤木, 林草模式, 土壤有机碳, 土壤微生物量碳, 季节动态

Abstract:

Soil microbes drive carbon and nutrient cycling in forest ecosystem. Soil microbial biomass is commonly limited by environmental factors and soil carbon availability. We employed two forest-grass systems of alder (Alnus formosana) + regrass (Lolium multiflorum) (AL) and alder (Alnus formosana) + limpograss (Hemarthria compress) (AH), as well as alder + natural weed (AN) that served as control, in a returning farmland to forest land in Danling, Sichuan Province, to investigate dynamics of soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) content. The results showed that soil organic carbon and soil microbial biomass carbon content in the two forest-grass compound models and the control (AN) all decreased with depth of the soil layers (0-10, 10-20, 20-30, 30-40 cm), and the decrease speed was fastest in AN, followed by AL and then AH model. The dynamic of SOC content of the three models over the all soil layers exhibited a "down-up-down" trend from spring to winter, except 0-10,10-20 cm in AH model. The SOC content was highest in summer, and lowest in autumn. However, SMBC content exhibited the opposite trend, highest in autumn and lowest in summer. There was significant difference in soil organic carbon and soil microbial biomass carbon between the two forest-grass compound models and AN (P <0.01), and the rank was in an order of AH model>AL model>AN model. The content of soil organic carbon in AH, and AL was 1.24-1.55, and 1.16-1.30 times of that in AN; and the content of soil microbial biomass carbon in AH, and AL was 1.50-2.95, and 1.23-1.80 times of that in AN.

Key words: Alnus formosana, forest and grass composite model, soil organic carbon, soil microbial biomass carbon, seasonal dynamic

中图分类号:

S718.55

何云, 周义贵, 李贤伟, 苗宇, 范川, 陈栎霖. 台湾桤木林草复合模式土壤微生物量碳季节动态[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(7): 26-33.

He Yun, Zhou Yigui, Li Xianwei, Miao Yu, Fan Chuan, Chen Yuelin. Seasonal Dynamics of Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon in Alnus formosana Forest-Grass Compound Models[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2013, 49(7): 26-33.

参考文献

方丽娜,杨效东,杜杰.2006.土地利用方式对西双版纳热带森林土壤微生物生物量碳的影响.应用生态学报, 22(4):837-844.

姜培坤. 2005. 不同林分下土壤活性有机碳库研究.林业科学, 41(1):10-13.

李贤伟, 张健,陈文德,等. 2005. 三倍体毛白杨—黑麦草复合模式细根和草根分布与生长特征.草业学报,14 (6):73-78.

李贤伟, 张健, 胡庭兴,等. 2009. 退耕还林理论基础及林草模式的实践应用. 北京: 科学出版社.

李新爱,肖和艾,吴金水,等.2006. 喀斯特地区不同土地利用方式对土壤有机碳、全氮以及微生物生物量碳和氮的影响.应用生态学报,17(10):1827-1831.

罗正华,李贤伟,袁渭阳,等. 2008. 台湾桤木幼林地细根生长及林地土壤抗蚀性分析.四川农业大学学报, 26 (3):245-250.

彭佩钦, 张文菊, 童成立,等. 2005. 洞庭湖典型湿地土壤碳、氮和微生物碳、氮及其垂直分布.水土保持学报, 19(1):49-53.

漆良华, 张旭东, 彭镇华,等.2008.湘西北退化侵蚀地植被恢复区土壤养分、微生物与酶活性的典范相关分析.林业科学,44(9):1-6.

漆良华, 张旭东, 周金星,等.2009.湘西北小流域不同植被恢复区土壤微生物数量、生物量碳氮及其分形特征.林业科学,45(8):14-20.

宋明伟, 李爱宗, 蔡立群,等. 2008. 耕作方式对土壤有机碳库的影响.农业环境科学学报, 27(2):622-626.

王巧,李贤伟,杨渺,等. 2007. 光皮桦木-扁穗牛鞭草复合模式细根草根生物量及空间分布.四川农业大学学报, 25(3):430

吴艺雪,杨效东,余广彬. 2009. 两种热带雨林土壤微生物生物量碳季节动态及其影响因素.生态环境学报,18 (2):658-663.

宇万太, 赵鑫, 马强,等. 2008. 长期定位试验下施肥对潮棕壤活性碳库及碳库管理指数的影响.土壤通报,39 (3):540-543.

张崇邦,金则新,施时迪. 2002. 浙江天台山几种林型下土壤细菌生理群生态分布的特性.植物生态学报, 26(3): 269-274.

张剑,汪思龙,王清奎,等. 2009. 不同森林植被下土壤活性有机碳含量及其季节变化.中国生态农业学报,17(1): 41-47.

张洁,姚宇卿,金轲. 2007. 保护性耕作对坡耕地土壤微生物碳、氮的影响.水土保持学报, 21(4):127-129.

张金波,宋长春,杨文燕. 2005. 小叶樟湿地表土水溶性有机碳季节动态变化及影响因素分析.环境科学学报, 25(10):1397-1402.

周建斌, 陈竹君,李生秀. 2001. 土壤微生物量氮含量、矿化特性及其供氮作用.生态学报, 21(10):1718-1721.

周丽霞,丁明懋. 2007. 土壤微生物学特性对土壤健康的指示作用.生物多样性,15(2):162-171.

Allison S, Gartner T, Mack M, et al. 2010. Nitrogen alter carbon dynamics during early succession in boreal forest. Soil Biology Biochemistry, 42(9):1157-1164.

Arrouays D, Pelissier P. 1994. Modeling carbon storage profiles in temperate forest humid loamy soils of France. Soil Science, 157(3):185-192.

Brookes P C.1995.The use of microbial parameters in monitoring soil pollution by heavy metals. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 19(4):269-279.

Devi N B, Yadava P S. 2006. Seasonal dynamics in soil microbial biomass C, N and P in a mixed-oak forest ecosystem of Manipur, Northeast India. Applied Soil Ecology, 31(3):220-227.

Edwards K A, McCulloch J, Kershaw G P, et al. 2006. Sol microbial and nutrient dynamics in a wet Arctic sedge meadow in late winter and early spring. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38(9):2843-2851.

Frey S D, Drijber R, Smith H, et al. 2008. Microbial biomass, functional capacity, and community structure after 12 years of soil warming. Soil Biology Biochemistry, 40(11):2904-2907.

Gobernaa M, Sáncheza J, Pascualb J A, et al. 2006. Surface and subsurface organic carbon, microbial biomass and activity in a forest soil sequence. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38(8):2233-2243.

Hawkes C V, Kivlin S N, Rocca J D, et al. 2011.Fungal community responses to precipitation. Globe Change Biology, 17(4):1637-1645.

Liu L, Gundersen P, Zhang T, et al. 2012.Effect of phosphorus addition on soil microbial biomass and community composition in three forest type in tropical China. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,44(1):31-38.

Sandra R D, Kathleen K T. 2012. The effect of fire on microbial biomass: a meta-analysis of field studies. Biogeochemistry, 109(1): 49-61.

Schlesinger W H. 1990. Evidence from chronosequence studies for fl low carbon storage potential of soils. Nature, 348(15):232-234.

Singh J S, Singh D P, Kashyap A K.2010. Microbial biomass C, N and P in disturbed dry tropical forest soil India. Pedosphere, 20(6):780-788.

Sparling G P. 1992. Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter. Soil Research, 30(2):195-207.

Spedding T A, Hamel C, Mehuys G R, et al. 2004. Soil microbial dynamics in maize growing soil under different tillage and residue management systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 36(3):499-512.

[1]	丁令智, 满秀玲, 肖瑞晗, 蔡体久. 寒温带森林根际土壤微生物量碳氮含量生长季内动态变化[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(7): 178-186.
[2]	王志康, 许晨阳, 耿增超, 刘莉丽, 侯琳, 杜璨, 王强, 吕东唯. 基于扣除根系体积新方法的秦岭辛家山2种林分土壤有机碳密度特征[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(6): 133-141.
[3]	卫玮, 党坤良. 秦岭南坡林地土壤有机碳密度空间分异特征[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(5): 11-19.
[4]	杜满义, 封焕英, 范少辉, 苏文会, 毛超, 唐晓鹿, 刘广路. 闽西毛竹林不同施肥处理下土壤有机碳含量垂直分布与季节动态[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(3): 12-20.
[5]	字洪标, 向泽宇, 王根绪, 阿的鲁骥, 王长庭. 青海不同林分土壤微生物群落结构(PLFA)[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(3): 21-32.
[6]	李鑫, 陈先刚, 白明锐, 李风格. 宣威市退耕还林柳杉林地土壤有机碳含量及活性组分的林龄变化[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(1): 11-19.
[7]	沈一凡, 钱进芳, 郑小平, 袁紫倩, 黄坚钦, 温国胜, 吴家森. 山核桃中心产区林地土壤肥力的时空变化特征[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(7): 1-12.
[8]	耿鹏飞, 金光泽. 小兴安岭4种森林类型细根生物量的时空格局[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(6): 140-148.
[9]	王宁, 杨雪, 李世兰, 王楠楠, 韩冬雪, 冯富娟. 不同海拔红松混交林土壤微生物量碳、氮的生长季动态[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(1): 150-158.
[10]	李翀, 周国模, 施拥军, 周宇峰, 张宇鹏, 沈利芬, 范叶青, 沈振明. 不同经营措施对毛竹林土壤有机碳的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(4): 26-35.
[11]	魏鹏, 范川, 凌银花, 李贤伟, 刘运科, 张腾飞, 苏宇. 台湾桤木林草复合模式细根生物量及形态特征[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(7): 157-163.
[12]	郭志华, 张莉, 郭彦茹, 文菀玉, 曹萌, 郭菊兰, 李志勇. 海南清澜港红树林湿地土壤有机碳分布及其与pH的关系[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(10): 8-15.
[13]	蔡倩倩;郭志华;胡启鹏;武高洁. 若尔盖高寒嵩草草甸湿地不同水分条件下土壤有机碳的垂直分布[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(3): 9-16.
[14]	漆良华;范少辉;杜满义;石雷;岳祥华;毛超. 湘中丘陵区毛竹纯林、毛竹-杉木混交林土壤有机碳垂直分布与季节动态[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(3): 17-24.
[15]	殷鸣放;周立君;殷炜达. 长白落叶松人工林带状间伐方式对土壤有机碳含量的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(7): 170-173.