宣威市退耕还林柳杉林地土壤有机碳含量及活性组分的林龄变化

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20170102

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的] 探讨云贵高原地区土壤有机碳含量及其活性组分在退耕还林后的变化，为退耕还林后的土壤碳储量变化评价和碳汇管理提供科学依据。[方法] 在云南省宣威市选择耕地对照和不同退耕还林年数（4，8，12年生）的柳杉人工林地，在不同土层（0~20，20~40和40~60 cm）采集土壤并收集枯落物和细根样品，测定土壤有机碳及其活性组分含量、土壤密度、土壤全氮含量、枯落物现存量和细根生物量。[结果] 与耕地相比，退耕还林4，8和12 年生时林地0~60 cm土层土壤有机碳含量分别下降20.07%，19.29%和11.52%，即退耕还林初期土壤有机碳含量显著下降，在退耕还林4年后开始逐渐回升，但在12年后仍未恢复到耕地水平；土壤高活性有机碳含量以造林前的耕地最高（4.46 g·kg^-1），4年生时最低（2.67 g·kg^-1）；土壤次高活性有机碳含量以8年生时最高（12.03 g·kg^-1），4年生时最低（4.61 g·kg^-1）；土壤活性有机碳含量以8年生时最高（20.94 g·kg^-1），12年生时最低（9.12 g·kg^-1）；土壤有机碳含量及其活性组分含量均随土层加深而减小，且存在显著的土层差异（P<0.05），有机碳含量的最小值（11.14 g·kg^-1）出现在8年生40~60 cm土层；各林龄柳杉林地0~60 cm土层有机碳含量及其高活性有机碳、次高活性有机碳与土壤全氮含量的相关系数分别为0.894，0.756和0.755，均极显著正相关，与土壤密度的相关系数为-0.664，显著负相关。[结论] 退耕还林柳杉林地0~60 cm土层有机碳含量及其活性组分含量随林龄增加先降后升，造林年数和林下枯落物量是影响土壤有机碳含量及其活性组分含量的重要因子，今后在森林碳汇管理中需大力推行封山育林，延长林分林龄，尽量保留林下枯落物。

关键词: 退耕还林, 柳杉林, 土壤有机碳, 活性

Abstract: [Objective] To provide scientific basis for evaluating the soil carbon stock and its management in afforested soils, we investigated the changes in soil organic carbon and its labile fractions after afforestation by the grain for green program.[Method] Cryptomeria fortumei plantation respectively 4, 8, and 12 years after planting by the grain for green Program and a farmland without trees as the control were chosen in Xuanwei Municipality, Yunnan Province. Soil, litter and fine roots were collected at different soil layers (0-20,20-40 and 40-60 cm) from the selected plantations and the control plot . Soil organic carbon content and its labile fractions, soil densities, soil nitrogen, as well as litter and fine root biomass were analyzed. [Result] Compared with the farmland, the content of soil organic carbon in the 0-60 cm layer deceased by 20.07%, 19.29%, and 11.52%, respectively for 4, 8 and 12 years of age, indicating that the soil organic carbon content significantly decreased in the early 4 years and then gradually increased thereafter, but not increased to the level in the farmland at the 12th year after planting. For the highest labile fraction of the soil organic carbon the maximum value was 4.46 g·kg^-1 before planting, and the minimum was 2.67 g·kg^-1 at the 4th year after planting; for the second highest labile fraction, the maximum was 12.03 g·kg^-1 at the 8th year after planting and the minimum was 4.61 g·kg^-1 at the 4th year after planting; for the least labile fraction the maximum was 20.94 g·kg^-1 at the 8th year after planting and the minimum was 9.12 g·kg^-1 at the 12th year. The contents of both soil organic carbon and its labile components decreased along with the depth of soil layer, and there were significant differences (P<0.05) among different soil layers; the minimum content (11.14 g·kg^-1) of soil organic carbon was found in the soil layer of 40-60 cm at the 8th year. The correlation coefficients of the soil organic carbon, the highest labile fraction, and the second highest labile fraction with the total soil nitrogen were 0.894, 0.756 and 0.755, respectively, which were all significantly positive. The coefficient of soil organic carbon with soil density was -0.664, indicating a significantly negative correlation.[Conclusion] The soil organic carbon and its labile fractions in the 0-60 cm soil layer showed a decrease in early years and an increase in later years in Cryptomeria fortumei plantations. The age and the litter content were important factors affecting the changes. We suggest reduce forest logging and retain the forest litter as far as possible in order to have a good management of forest carbon sink.

Key words: Grain for Green Program, Cryptomeria fortumei plantation, soil organic carbon, lability

中图分类号:

S714
S791.31

李鑫, 陈先刚, 白明锐, 李风格. 宣威市退耕还林柳杉林地土壤有机碳含量及活性组分的林龄变化[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(1): 11-19.

Li Xin, Chen Xiangang, Bai Mingrui, Li Fengge. Variation in the Content of Soil Organic Carbon and Its Labile Fractions among Different Age of Cryptomeria fortumei Plantation Afforested by the Grain for Green Program in Xuanwei Municipality of Southwest China[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(1): 11-19.

参考文献

常宗强,冯起,司建华,等.2008.祁连山不同植被类型土壤碳贮量和碳通量.生态学杂志,27(5): 681-688.
(Chang Z Q, Feng Q, Si J H, et al. 2008. Soil carbon storage and CO₂ flux under different vegetation types in Qilian Mountains. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 27(5): 681-688.[in Chinese])
曹宏杰,王立民,罗春雨,等.2013.三江平原地区土壤有机碳及其组分的空间分布特征.生态环境学报,22(7): 11l1-1118.
(Cao H J, Wang L M, Luo C Y, et al. 2013. Spatial distribution patterns of soil organic carbon and its fractions in Sanjiang Plain. Ecology and Environment Sciences, 22(7): 11l1-1118.[in Chinese])
邓坤枚,罗天祥,张林,等.2005.云南松林的根系生物量及其分布规律的研究.应用生态学报,16(1): 21-24.
(Deng K M, Luo T X, Zhang L, et al. 2005. Root biomass of different stand-age Pinus yunnanensis forests and its distribution pattern in different soil depths. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 16(1): 21-24.[in Chinese])
国家林业局.1999.森林土壤分析方法.北京: 中国标准出版社.
(State Forestry Administration. 1999. Forest soil analysis method.Beijing:China Standard Press.[in Chinese])
高玉蓉,许红卫,周斌.2005.稻田土壤养分的空间变异性研究.土壤通报,36(6): 822-825.
(Gao Y R, Xu H W, Zhou B. 2005. Investigation on spatial variability of soil nutrients in paddy field. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 36(6): 822-825.[in Chinese])
黄承标,吴仁宏,何斌,等.2009.三匹虎自然保护区森林土壤理化性质的研究.西部林业科学,38(3): 16-21.
(Huang C B, Wu R H, He B, et al. 2009. Physical and chemical property of forest soil in Three Tiger Nature Reserve. Journal of West Forestry Science, 38(3): 16-21. [in Chinese])
梁宏温,温远光,温琳华,等.2009.连栽对尾巨桉短周期人工林碳贮量的影响.生态学报,29(8): 4242-4250.
(Liang H W, Wen Y G, Wen L H, et al. 2009. Effects of continuous cropping on the carbon storage of Eucalyptus urophylla×E. grandis short-rotations plantations. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29(8): 4242-4250.[in Chinese])
刘恩,王晖,刘世荣.2012.南亚热带不同林龄红锥人工林碳贮量与碳固定特征.应用生态学报,41(2): 335-340.
(Liu E, Wang H, Liu S R. 2012. The subtropical red cone of different age plantation carbon storage and carbon fixation characteristics. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 41(2): 335-340.[in Chinese])
刘文利,罗广军.2006.不同林型下土壤理化性质的差异研究.吉林林业科技,35(1): 26-34.
(Liu W L, Luo G J. 2006. Analysis of soil physical and chemical properties inside and outside forest-land. Jilin Forestry Science and Technology, 35(1): 26-34.[in Chinese])
刘延惠,王彦辉,于澎涛,等.2012. 六盘山南部华北落叶松人工林土壤有机碳含量. 林业科学,48(12): 1-9.
(Liu Y H, Wang Y H, Yu P T, et al. 2012. Soil organic carbon contents of Larix principis-rupprechtii plantations in the southern part of Liupan Mountains. Scientia Silvae Sinicae. 48(12):1-9.[in Chinese])
苗娟,周传艳,李世杰,等.2014.不同林龄云南松林土壤有机碳和全氮积累特征.应用生态学报,25(3): 625-631.
(Miao J, Zhou C Y, Li S J, et al. 2014. The accumulation characteristics of different ages of Yunnan pine forest soil organic carbon and total nitrogen. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 25(3): 625-631.[in Chinese])
沈宏.1999.土壤活性有机碳的表征及其生态效应.生态学杂志,18(3): 32-38.
(Shen H. 1999. Characterization of active organic carbon in soil and its ecological effect. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 18(3): 32-38.[in Chinese])
申家朋,张文辉,李彦华,等.2013.黄土高原丘陵区退耕还林地油松人工林碳储量及分配特征研究.西北植物学报, 33(11): 2309-2316.
(Shen J P, Zhang W H, Li Y H, et al. 2013. Characteristics of carbon storage and sequestration of Pinus tabulaeformis forest land converted by farmland in Loess Hilly Area. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 33(11): 2309-2316.[in Chinese])
宋会兴,苏智先,彭远英.2005.山地土壤肥力与植物群落次生演替关系研究.生态学杂志,24(12): 1531-1533.
(Song H X, Su Z X, Peng Y Y. 2005. Relationships between soil fertility and secondary succession of plant community in Jinyun Mountain. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 24(12): 1531-1533.[in Chinese])
王春梅,刘艳红,邵彬,等.2007.量化退耕还林后土壤碳变化.北京林业大学学报,29(3): 112-119.
(Wang C M, Liu Y H, Shao B, et al. 2007. Quantifying the soil carbon changes following the afforestation of former arable land. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 29(3): 112-119.[in Chinese])
韦国富,黄承标,覃文更,等.2009.木论自然保护区森林土壤的理化特性.亚热带农业研究,5(3): 180-183.
(Wei G F, Huang C B, Qin W G, et al. 2009. Physical and chemical properties of forest soils in Mulun Nature Reserve. Subtropical Agriculture Research, 5(3): 180-183.[in Chinese])
徐贵来,张洪江,吕相海,等.2014.重庆四面山五种人工林土壤有机碳储量研究.生态环境学报,5(2): 211-216.
(Xu G L, Zhang H J, Lü X H, et al. 2014. The soil organic carbon storage study under five plantations in the simian mountain of Chongqing. Ecology and Environment Sciences, 5(2): 211-216.[in Chinese])
徐明岗,于荣,王伯仁,等.2006.长期不同施肥下红壤活性有机质与碳库管理指数变化.土壤学报,43(5): 723-729.
(Xu M G, Yu R, Wang B R, et al. 2006. Labile organic matter and carbon management index in red soil under long-term fertilization. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 43(5): 723-729.[in Chinese])
易秀,谷晓静,侯燕卿,等.2011.陕西省泾惠渠灌区土壤肥力质量综合评价.干旱区资源与环境,25(2): 132-137.
(Yi X, Gu X J, Hou Y Q, et al. 2011. Comprehensive assessment on soil fertility quality in Jinghuiqu irrigation district of Shaanxi Province. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 25(2): 132—137.[in Chinese])
郑顺安,常庆瑞.2006.黄土高原不同类型人工林对土壤肥力的影响.西北农林科技大学学报,34(2): 119-123.
(Zheng S A, Chang Q R. 2006. The influence of different plantations on the soil fertility on Loess Plateau. Journal of Northwest Sci-Tech Unversity of Agriculture and Forestry, 34(2): 119-123.[in Chinese])
周才平,欧阳华,裴志永,等.2003.中国森林生态系统的土壤净化矿化研究.植物生态学报,27(2): 170-176.
(Zhou C P, Ouyang H, Pei Z Y, et al. 2003. Soil purification and mineralization of forest ecosystem in China. Journal of plant ecology, 27(2): 170-176.[in Chinese])
Houghton R A, Hackler J L, Lawrence K T. 1999. The US carbon budget: contribution from land-use change. Science, 285(5427): 574-578.
Jobbagy E G, Jackson R B.2000. The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecological Applications, 10(2):423-436.
Lefroy R D B, Blair G J, Strong W M. 1993. Changes in soil organic matter with cropping as measured by organic carbon fractions and ¹³C natural isotope abundance. Plant and Soil, 155(1): 399-402.
Moroni M T. 2012. Aspects of forest carbon management in Australia: a discussion paper. Forest Ecology and Management, 275(4):111-116.
Paul K I, Polglase P J, Nyakuengama J G, et al. 2002. Change in soil carbon following afforestation. Forest Ecology and Management, 168(1/3):241-257.
Vesterdal L, Ritter E, Cundersen P. 2002. Change in soil organic carbon following afforestation of former arable land. Forest Ecology and Management, 169(1/2):137-147.
Wittmann C, Kahkonen M A, Ilvesniemi H, et al. 2004. Areal activities and stratification of hydrolytic enzymes involved in the biochemical cycles of carbon, nitrogen, sulphur and phosphorus in podsolized boreal forest soils.Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 36(3): 425-433.

[1]	王志康, 许晨阳, 耿增超, 刘莉丽, 侯琳, 杜璨, 王强, 吕东唯. 基于扣除根系体积新方法的秦岭辛家山2种林分土壤有机碳密度特征[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(6): 133-141.
[2]	卫玮, 党坤良. 秦岭南坡林地土壤有机碳密度空间分异特征[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(5): 11-19.
[3]	刘辉, 吴小芹, 任嘉红, 陈丹. 荧光假单胞菌与红绒盖牛肝菌共接种对杨树根际土壤酶活性及微生物多样性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(1): 22-30.
[4]	周婧, 杨琦, 李钢, 徐静. 红树属植物内生真菌多样性及其代谢产物研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(1): 89-102.
[5]	王波, 李琴, 朱炜, 陈文海, 祝虹梁, 沈泉, 朱安明, 赵建诚. 毛竹林覆盖经营对土壤养分含量、酶活性及微生物生物量的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(1): 110-118.
[6]	刘建凤, 董礼龙, 曹丹丹, 罗红梅, 魏建荣. 抗绕实蝇沙棘无性系的筛选及相关化学物质和酶活性分析[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(9): 104-113.
[7]	王亚召, 嵇保中, 刘曙雯, 徐立军, 金明霞, 王怡. 黑翅土白蚁菌圃对采食工蚁的诱食活性[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(8): 117-123.
[8]	张慧春, 朱正阳, 郑加强, 周宏平, 唐进根. 面向林业病虫害防治的生物农药喷施系统[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(10): 116-124.
[9]	张鹏, 赵彤彤, 李明月, 吴灵东, 沈海龙. 氯化钙、ABA和蔗糖预处理对解除休眠水曲柳种子低温脱水萌发的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(7): 54-61.
[10]	刘浩, 陈思焜, 张敏新, 刘璨. 退耕还林工程对农户收入不平等影响的测度与分析 ——基于总收入决定方程的Shapley值分解[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(5): 125-133.
[11]	杜满义, 封焕英, 范少辉, 苏文会, 毛超, 唐晓鹿, 刘广路. 闽西毛竹林不同施肥处理下土壤有机碳含量垂直分布与季节动态[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(3): 12-20.
[12]	字洪标, 向泽宇, 王根绪, 阿的鲁骥, 王长庭. 青海不同林分土壤微生物群落结构(PLFA)[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(3): 21-32.
[13]	张鹏, 宋博洋, 吴灵东, 沈海龙. 解除休眠的水曲柳种子对不同脱水条件的萌发和生理响应[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(3): 60-67.
[14]	杜庆鑫, 魏艳秀, 刘攀峰, 杜红岩. 杜仲雄花主要活性成分含量的多样性[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(2): 35-43.
[15]	李洁, 姚宝花, 宋宇琴, 李六林. 枣不同品种和果实不同部位糖积累及相关酶活性[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(12): 30-40.