欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2005, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 12-18.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20050303

• 论文及研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

生态足迹理论在青海省共和县荒漠化自然资本核算中的应用

王学全 卢琦   

  1. 中国林业科学研究院林业研究所中国防治荒漠化研究和发展中心,北京100091
  • 收稿日期:2003-12-10 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2005-05-25 发布日期:2005-05-25

Natural Capital Accounting with the Ecological Footprint Concept in Gonghe County as a Desertification Area, Qinghai Province

Wang Xuequan,Lu Qi   

  1. Research Institute of Forestry, Centre on Combating Desertification,CAF Beijing100091
  • Received:2003-12-10 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2005-05-25 Published:2005-05-25

摘要:

生态足迹是某地区生产消费的粮食和纤维、维持能源消费以及建筑用地的总和。应用生态足迹分析,共和县2002年人均生态足迹供给12hm2 ,即生态承载力值为1.056hm2。该地区的人均生态足迹为1.662hm2 与生态承载力比较,生态赤字0.606hm2 。共和县荒漠化发展是生态足迹扩大的结果之一,另一方面荒漠化扩张减小了共和县的生态承载力,因此荒漠化发展对共和县生态赤字起到两个方面的作用。提出共和县减少生态赤字,走可持续发展道路的政策措施。引入产量因子的地区修正因子,使Wackernagel因子更符合中国不同地区的实际。

关键词: 生态足迹, 生态承载力, 共和县, 荒漠化

Abstract:

Footprint framework offers a natural capital appraisal for nations with which human demands can be compared with natures available supply for human use. The ecological footprint compares renewable natural resources consumption with natures biologically productive capacity. A countys footprint is the total area required to produced the food and fibres that county consumes, sustain its energy consumption, and give space for its infrastructure. In the case of Gonghe County of Qinhai Province, the average citizen occupies 1.662 hm2 of biologically productive space, while there is 1.056 hm2 available, the national ecological deficit is 0.606 hm2 per person. Desertification is a double_bind of ecological deficit for both the result of footprint expansion and the lost of biologically productive capacity. Using the range of economic and regulatory instruments available, government policies can reduced the ecological deficit by addressing the four issues. Without any doubt, the calculations presented in this study are still characterized by many limitations. One is the data source. United nations statistics may not be complete and consistent among countries or over time. The accuracy of the assessment would profit from more detailed productivity assessments, particularly for animal products and forests. Methodologically, the assessments could be made more complete by including the ecological spaces used for freshwater use, the absorption of still left out waste products and contaminants.

Key words: ecological footprint, biologically productive capacity, Gonghe County, desertification