欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4): 153-162.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210416

• 问题讨论 • 上一篇    下一篇

国有林区天然林资源保护工程绩效评价——以黑龙江省重点国有林区为例

李朝洪,韦唯*,刘舒欣   

  1. 东北林业大学经济管理学院 哈尔滨 150040
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-05 出版日期:2021-04-01 发布日期:2021-05-21
  • 通讯作者: 韦唯
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目(20BJY077)

Performance Evaluation of Natural Forest Protection Project in State-Owned Forest Region——A Case Study of Key State-Owned Forest Region in Heilongjiang Province

Chaohong Li,Wei Wei*,Shuxin Liu   

  1. College of Economics and Management, Northeast Forestry University Harbin 150040
  • Received:2020-08-05 Online:2021-04-01 Published:2021-05-21
  • Contact: Wei Wei

摘要:

目的: 以黑龙江省重点国有林区为例,尝试对天然林保护工程绩效进行较为客观的跟踪评价,以期为我国天然林保护工程绩效评价提供参考。方法: 从资源子系统、产业子系统、社会子系统3个方面建立"天保工程"绩效评价指标体系,基于熵权的TOPSIS模型以2000—2018年黑龙江省重点国有林区为例对国有林区"天保工程"绩效进行评价。结果: 2000—2018年"天保工程"资源子系统绩效值、产业子系统绩效值、社会子系统绩效值及"天保工程"系统综合绩效值分别在0.019 0~0.748 0、0.182 7~0.776 4、0.010 0~0.782 2和0.018 8~0.753 2之间,总体上均呈现波动上升态势。结论: 以黑龙江省重点国有林区为例确定的"天保工程"绩效评价指标体系熵权,客观地折射出以天然林保护与生态环境建设为主、兼顾惠及民生、促进社会和谐发展以及助力国有林区产业经济转型发展的"天保工程"主要目标。与"天保工程一期"相比,"天保工程二期"的资源子系统绩效值、产业子系统绩效值、社会子系统绩效值及"天保工程"系统综合绩效值均有较大提升,绩效等级水平都已实现由"变化不大"向"略有好转"再向"变得较好"的转变,截至2018年底,各绩效等级水平都已达到"变得较好",但离"变得很好"的绩效最好水平尚有"一个等级"差距。

关键词: 国有林区, 天保工程, 绩效评价, 熵权TOPSIS模型

Abstract:

Objective: The key state-owned forest region in Heilongjiang Province was taken as an example for a relatively objective tracking evaluation of the performance of natural forest protection project, in order to provide a basis for the performance evaluation of natural forest protection projects in China. Method: A performance evaluation indicators system consisting of three subsystems of resources, industries and society was developed to evaluate the performance of natural forest protection project in the key state-owned forest region of Heilongjiang Province from 2000 to 2018 by using TOPSIS model based on entropy weight. Result: From 2000 to 2018, the performance values of the three subsystems of resources, industries and society, and the whole natural forest project system were respectively in the range of 0.019 0-0.748 0, 0.182 7-0.776 4, 0.010 0-0.782 2 and 0.018 8-0.753 2, showing a upward fluctuating trend on the whole. Conclusion: The entropy weight of the performance evaluation indicators system for the natural forest protection project based on the case study objectively reflects the main objectives of the natural forest protection project which focuses on natural forest protection and ecological environment construction, benefiting people's livelihood, promoting social harmonious development, and helping the industrial economic transformation and development of state-owned forest region. Compared with the "Phase Ⅰ Natural Forest Protection Project", the performance values of the three subsystems and the whole project system of the "Phase Ⅱ Natural Forest Protection Project" had been greatly improved, and their performance levels had all been transformed from "little changed" to "slightly improved" and then to "becoming better". By the end of 2018, all performance levels had reached "becoming better", but there was still one more level to reach the best performance level of "becoming very good".

Key words: state-owned forest region, natural forest protection project, performance evaluation, entropy weight TOPSIS model

中图分类号: