皮层和中柱对水曲柳和落叶松吸收根直径变异的影响

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20141008

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用植物解剖学和通径分析方法研究皮层和中柱对水曲柳和落叶松人工林根系前2级根(最末端的根尖为1级根)直径变异的影响。结果表明: 1) 根直径、皮层厚度和中柱直径具有明显的季节变化,三者具有相同的变化规律; 2) 随着皮层厚度或中柱直径的增加,根直径显著增加,皮层厚度可以解释直径变异的85%~95%,中柱直径可以解释直径差异的92%~97%,表明皮层和中柱均对直径变异有重要的影响; 3) 通径分析结果显示,水曲柳根直径变异和季节变化主要是皮层变化起直接作用,中柱仅起间接作用; 而落叶松则是皮层起间接作用,中柱起直接作用。研究结果为认识木本植物吸收根种内直径变异的机制提供重要基础。

关键词: 根序, 根直径, 人工林, 通径分析, 细根

Abstract:

The diameter of fine roots plays an important role in root physiological and ecological functions of woody plants. Fine root diameter varies greatly within or among tree species, even at the same root branch level. However, the underlying mechanism for such variation remains unclear. Although fine root morphology and anatomy in woody plants have been extensively studied during past decades, it is poorly understood for the mechanism of diameter variation in absorptive roots. In this study, we sampled fine roots from Fraxinus mandshurica and Larix gmelinii plantations, and measured root morphological (diameter) and anatomical traits (cortical thickness and stele diameter), and used path analysis to examine the effects of anatomical traits on root diameter variation of the two species. There were substantial and similar seasonal variations in root diameter, cortical thickness and stele diameter in both species. Root diameter increased with increasing of cortical thickness and stele diameter. Correlation analysis indicated that 85% -95% of the variations of root diameter could be explained by the variation of cortex thickness, and 92% -97% by variation of stele diameter, suggesting that the anatomical traits were important for root diameter variation in the two species. Path analysis showed that root diameter variation in F. mandshurica was affected directly by cortical thickness, and indirectly by stele diameter, however in L. gmelinii, it was affected directly by stele diameter, and indirectly by cortical thickness. These results may help us understand the mechanism of diameter variation of absorptive roots in woody plants.

Key words: root order, root diameter, plantation, path analysis, fine root

中图分类号:

S718.41

谷加存, 赵妍丽, 王文娜, 王韶仲, 王政权. 皮层和中柱对水曲柳和落叶松吸收根直径变异的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(10): 59-66.

Gu Jiacun, Zhao Yanli, Wang Wenna, Wang Shaozhong, Wang Zhengquan. Effects of Cortical Thickness and Stele Diameter on Variations of Root Diameter in Fraxinus mandshurica and Larix gmelinii[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(10): 59-66.

参考文献

常文静, 郭大立. 2008.中国温带、亚热带和热带森林45个常见树种细根直径变异. 植物生态学报, 32(6): 1248-1257.
(Chang W J, Guo D L. 2008. Variation in root diameter among 45 common tree species in temperate, subtropical and tropical forests in China. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 32(6): 1248-1257. [in Chinese] )
陈强. 1996. 通径分析及其在林业试验统计分析中的应用. 云南林业科技, (1): 54-61.
(Chen Q. 1996. The application of path coefficient analysis and its in forestry test statistic analysis. Yunnan Forestry Science and Technology, (1): 54-61. [in Chinese] )
师伟, 王政权, 刘金梁, 等. 2008.帽儿山天然次生林20个阔叶树种细根形态. 植物生态学报, 32(6): 1217-1226.
(Shi W, Wang Z Q, Liu J L, et al. 2008. Fine root morphology of twenty hardwood species in Maoershan Natural Secondary Forest in Northeastern China. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 32(6): 1217-1226. [in Chinese] )
王向荣, 王政权, 韩有志, 等. 2005.水曲柳和落叶松不同根序之间细根直径的变异研究. 植物生态学报, 29(6): 871-877.
(Wang X R, Wang Z Q, Han Y Z, et al. 2005. Variations of fine root diameter with root order in Manchurian ash and Dahurian larch plantations. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 29(6): 871-877. [in Chinese] )
卫星, 刘颖, 陈海波. 2008.黄波罗不同根序的解剖结构及其功能异质性. 植物生态学报, 32(6): 1238-1247.
(Wei X, Liu Y, Chen H B. 2008. Anatomical and functional heterogeneity among different root orders of Phellodendron amurense. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 32(6): 1238-1247. [in Chinese] )
许旸, 谷加存, 董雪云, 等. 2011.海南岛4个热带阔叶树种前5级细根的形态、解剖结构和组织碳氮含量. 植物生态学报, 35(9): 955-964.
(Xu Y, Gu J C, Dong X Y, et al. 2011. Fine root morphology,anatomy and tissue nitrogen and carbon contents of the first five orders in four tropical hardwood species in Hainan Island,China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 35(9): 955-964. [in Chinese] )
张秀娟, 吴楚, 梅莉, 等. 2006.水曲柳和落叶松人工林根系分解与养分释放. 应用生态学报, 17(8): 1370-1376.
(Zhang X J, Wu C, Mei L, et al. 2006. Root decomposition and nutrient release of Fraxinus manshurica and Larix gmelinii plantations. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 17(8): 1370-1376. [in Chinese] )
Baddeley J, Watson C. 2005. Influences of root diameter, tree age, soil depth and season on fine root survivorship in Prunus avium. Plant and Soil, 276(1/2): 15-22.
Bai W M, Wang Z W, Chen Q S, et al. 2008. Spatial and temporal effects of nitrogen addition on root life span of Leymus chinensis in a typical steppe of Inner Mongolia. Functional Ecology, 22(4): 583-591.
Brundrett M C. 2002. Coevolution of roots and mycorrhizas of land plants. New Phytologist, 154(2): 275-304.
Chapin III F S, Matson P, Mooney H A. 2002. Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. New York: Springer-Verlag, 97-119.
Comas L H, Bouma T J, Eissenstat D M. 2002. Linking root traits to potential growth rate in six temperate tree species. Oecologia,132(1): 34-43.
Comas L H, Eissenstat D M. 2004. Linking fine root traits to maximum potential growth rate among 11 mature temperate tree species. Functional Ecology, 18(3): 388-397.
Dunbabin V M, Rengel Z, Diggle A J. 2004. Simulating form and function of root systems: efficiency of nitrate uptake is dependent on root system architecture and the spatial and temporal variability of nitrate supply. Functional Ecology, 18(2): 204-211.
Eissenstat D M, Yanai R D. 1997. The ecology of root lifespan. Advances in Ecological Research, 27: 1-60.
Esau K. 1977. Anatomy of Seed Plants. 2^nd ed. New York: Wiley, 351-372.
Fahey T J, Hughes J W. 1994. Fine root dynamics in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, NH. Journal of Ecology, 82(3): 533-548.
Fitter A H. 2002. Characteristics and functions of root systems// Waisel Y, Eshel E, Kafkafi U. Plant Roots: the Hidden Half. 3^rd ed. New York, USA: Dekker Press, 15-32.
Glass A D M. 2002. Nutrient absorption by plant roots: regulation of uptake to match plant demand// Waisel Y, Eshel E, Kafkafi U. Plant Roots: the Hidden Half. 3^rd edn. New York, USA: Dekker Press, 571-587.
Guo D L, Xia M X, Wei X, et al. 2008. Anatomical traits associated with absorption and mycorrhizal colonization are linked to root branch order in twenty-three Chinese temperate tree species. New Phytologist, 180(3): 673-683.
Hummel I, Vile D, Violle C, et al. 2007. Relating root structure and anatomy to whole-plant functioning in 14 herbaceous Mediterranean species. New Phytologist, 173(2): 313 -321.
Leppälammi-Kujansuu J, Ostonen I, Strmgren M, et al. 2013. Effects of long-term temperature and nutrient manipulation on Norway spruce fine roots and mycelia production. Plant and Soil, 366(1/2): 287-303.
McMichael B L, Burke J J. 2002. Temperature effects on root growth// Waisel Y, Eshel E, Kafkafi U. Plant Roots: the Hidden Half 3^rd edn. New York, USA: Dekker Press, 717-728.
Niinemets V. 1999. Research review: components of leaf dry mass per area-thickness and density-alter leaf photosynthetic capacity in reverse directions in woody plants. New Phytologist, 144(1): 35-47.
Niinemets V. 2001. Global-scale climatic controls of leaf dry mass per area density, and thickness in trees and shrubs. Ecology, 82(2): 453-469.
Peterson C A, Enstone D E, Taylor J H.1999.Pine root structure and its potential significance for root function. Plant and Soil, 217(1/2): 205-213.
Pregitzer K S, DeForest J L, Burton A J, et al. 2002. Fine root architecture of nine North American trees. Ecological Monographs, 72(2): 293-309.
Rieger M, Litvin P. 1999. Root system hydraulic conductivity in species with contrasting root anatomy. Journal of Experimental Botany, 50(331): 201-209.
Rousseau J V D, Sylvia D M, Fox A J. 1994. Contribution of ecto-mycorrhiza to the potential nutrient-absorbing surface of pine. New Phytologist, 128(4): 639-644.
Shipley B, Lechowicz M J, Wright I, et al. 2006. Fundamental trade-offs generating the worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Ecology, 87(3): 535-541.
Smith S E, Read D J. 2008. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. 3^rd ed.London: Academic Press, 191-269.
Sperry J S, Stiller V, Hacke U G. 2002. Soil water uptake and water transport through root systems// Waisel Y, Eshel E, Kafkafi U. Plant Roots: the Hidden Half. 3^rd edn. New York, USA: Dekker Press, 663-682.
Sun Y, Gu J C, Zhuang H F et al. 2010. Effects of ectomycorrhizal colonization and nitrogen fertilization on morphology of root tips in a Larix gmelinii plantation. Ecological Research, 25(2): 295-302.
Ugawa S, Iwamoto K, Matsuura Y, et al. 2010. Root-tip diameters of woody species in subalpine Abies forest. Plant and Soil, 326(1/2): 303-310.
Wells C E, Glenn D M, Eissenstat D M. 2002. Changes in the risk of fine-root mortality with age: a case study in peach, Prunus persica (Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany, 89(1): 79-87.
Zobel R W, Kinraide T B, Baligar V C. 2007. Fine root diameters can change in response to changes in nutrient concentrations. Plant and Soil, 297(1/2): 243-254.

[1]	夏国威, 孙晓梅, 陈东升, 张守攻. 日本落叶松冠层光合特性的空间变化[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(6): 13-21.
[2]	巫志龙, 周成军, 周新年, 刘富万, 朱奇雄, 黄金湧, 陈文. 不同强度采伐5年后杉阔混交人工林土壤呼吸速率差异[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(6): 142-149.
[3]	张茜茜, 杨庆朋, 刘亮, 王清涛, 李菲, 郭丽丽, 郝立华, 曹旭, 范晓懂, 梁伟佳, 郑云普. 环剥对毛白杨树干表面CO₂通量及其温度敏感性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(5): 1-10.
[4]	王超群, 焦如珍, 董玉红, 厚凌宇, 赵京京, 赵世荣. 不同林龄杉木人工林土壤微生物群落代谢功能差异[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(5): 36-45.
[5]	刘宝, 王民煌, 余再鹏, 林思祖, 林开敏. 中亚热带天然林改造成人工林后土壤呼吸的变化特征[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(4): 1-12.
[6]	杨安娜, 陆云峰, 张俊红, 吴家森, 徐金良, 童再康. 杉木人工林土壤养分及酸杆菌群落结构变化[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(1): 119-127.
[7]	周贤武, 高玉磊, 苏明垒, 赵荣军, 吕建雄. 基因工程改良木材性质研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(3): 152-160.
[8]	何凌仙子, 贾志清, 刘涛, 李清雪, 张友焱, 石坤, 冯莉莉, 杨凯悦, 赵雪彬. 高寒沙地中间锦鸡儿和柠条锦鸡儿细根分解动态特征[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(2): 162-169.
[9]	高尚坤, 肖文发, 曾立雄, 雷蕾, 黄志霖, 王松. 马尾松人工林干扰对土壤微生物群落结构的短期影响[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(12): 92-101.
[10]	李平昊, 申鑫, 代劲松, 曹林. 机载激光雷达人工林单木分割方法比较和精度分析[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(12): 127-136.
[11]	冯宜明, 李毅, 曹秀文, 刘锦乾, 齐瑞, 赵阳, 陈学龙. 甘肃南部不同密度云杉人工幼林的林分结构特征及土壤理化性质[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(10): 20-30.
[12]	彭晓瑞, 张占宽. 等离子体处理对6种木材表面润湿性能的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(1): 90-98.
[13]	贺同鑫, 孙建飞, 李艳鹏, 俞有志, 胡宝清, 王清奎. 环割对杉木和马尾松人工林土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(6): 77-84.
[14]	顾伟, 马玲, 孙虎, 王利东, 张子龙. 不同土壤环境下落叶松人工林昆虫群落结构及动态的差异[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(5): 97-106.
[15]	赵文瑞, 刘鑫, 张金池, 王玲, 谢德晋, 袁颖丹, 王金平, 王鹰翔. 添加酸雨酸度和硫氮比对麻栎林细根生长的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(4): 158-165.