欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2009, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (10): 134-140.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20091023

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

集体林权制度改革中农户流转收益合理性分析*——以江西省遂川县为例

谢屹1,2 温亚利1,2 公培臣3   

  1. 1.北京林业大学经济管理学院 北京 100083; 2.北京林业大学林业经济国际交流与合作中心 北京 100083; 3.瑞典农业大学林业经济系 瑞典Umea市
  • 收稿日期:2009-02-14 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2009-10-25 发布日期:2009-10-25
  • 通讯作者: 温亚利
  • 基金资助:
     

Reasonableness of Farmers Transfer Benefits in the Reform of Collective Forest Property Rights System:

Xie Yi1,2,Wen Yali1,2,Gong Peichen3   

  1. 1.College of Economics & Management, Beijing Forestry University Beijing 100083; 2.Centre of International Exchange & Cooperation for Forestry Economics, Beijing Forestry University Beijing 100083; 3.Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Se-901 83 Umea, Sweden
  • Received:2009-02-14 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2009-10-25 Published:2009-10-25
  • Supported by:
     

摘要:

农户流转收益是否合理,关系到农户长期利益以及集体林权制度改革的目标能否充分实现。对遂川县集体林权制度改革和林地林木流转进行简单回顾,以林地林木价格理论作为流转收益合理性分析的理论基础,基于Faustmann林价公式和林木销售价法,构建流转收益分析模型,运用调研所获数据,分析农户流转收益的合理性。研究结论为: 在没有采伐指标约束的情况下,林地与林木流转的理论价格明显高于农户流转收益; 林地与林木的理论价格随采伐指标约束程度的增加而下降。在平均采伐指标获得率水平下,农户转出林地、林木所获收益不具有合理性。为使得农户流转收益具有合理性,既需要完善流转制度措施,也应优化生产制度。

关键词: 集体林权制度改革, 农户, 流转收益集体林权制度改革, 农户, 流转收益集体林权制度改革, 农户, 流转收益集体林权制度改革, 农户, 流转收益集体林权制度改革, 农户, 流转收益

Abstract:

The ongoing property rights reform of collectively owned forests has contributed to increasing forest farmers income. Increments of forestry income resulted from acquirement of transfer benefits and an income increase in forest management. Whether farmers transfer benefits are reasonable determines to some extent that the objectives of collective forest property rights system reform can be fully achieved. In this paper we applied forest land and stumpage price theory to examine whether or not the present transfer benefits were reasonable. Following a brief review of the reform and the transfer in Suichuan County, we compared the theoretical prices with the actual prices of forestland and stumpage transfers. It was concluded that, given the present logging quota constraints, farmers transfer income was significantly lower than the theoretical value of the forest. The policy implications of the result were discussed.

Key words: the reform of collective forest Property rights system, farmers, transfer benefits

中图分类号: