Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2024, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (1): 142-150.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20230098
• Review • Previous Articles
Wanli Lao,Xiaoling Li*,Xinfang Duan
Received:
2023-03-15
Online:
2024-01-25
Published:
2024-01-29
Contact:
Xiaoling Li
CLC Number:
Wanli Lao,Xiaoling Li,Xinfang Duan. Research Progress for Carbon Footprint Assessment of Wood and Bamboo Products[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2024, 60(1): 142-150.
Table 1
Carbon footprints of nine common types of bamboo products kg·m?3"
产品类别 Product category | 规格 Specification | 运输过程碳排放 Carbon emissions from transportation | 加工过程碳排放Carbon emissions from processing | 附加物隐含碳排放Carbon emissions from the additives | 竹废料燃烧碳排放Carbon emissions from bamboo scraps | 碳储量 Biogenic carbon storage | 碳足迹 Carbon footprints |
带青竹展开地板 The flattened bamboo floor with green bark | 1 200 mm×137 mm×18 mm | 31.2 | 87.8 | 31.8 | 232.2 | 168.8 | ?17.9 |
竹展开砧板(规格1) The flattened bamboo chopping board | 360 mm×240 mm×17 mm | 28.4 | 122.9 | 43.1 | 162.2 | 79.8 | 114.6 |
竹展开砧板 (规格2)The flattened bamboo chopping board | 380 mm×280 mm×18 mm | 26.0 | 138.0 | 39.5 | 154.8 | 73.1 | 130.4 |
户外竹重组地板 Reconstituted bamboo floor (outdoors) | 1 860 mm×137 mm×20 mm | 31.0 | 143.6 | 78.3 | 95.9 | 249.1 | 3.8 |
室内竹重组地板 Reconstituted bamboo floor (indoors) | 910 mm×127 mm×14 mm | 27.2 | 156.4 | 73.1 | 91.1 | 205.1 | 51.6 |
竹刨切片Bamboo sliced veneer | 2 500 mm×450 mm×0.6 mm | 37.1 | 253.5 | 30.2 | 331.4 | 168.2 | 152.6 |
竹窗帘 Bamboo curtain | 1 500 mm×3.5 mm×1.5 mm | 28.9 | 187.7 | 26.0 | 284.2 | 124.5 | 118.1 |
竹地毯 Bamboo blanket | 1 500 mm×2.5 mm×2.5 mm | 28.7 | 174.8 | 72.8 | 291.8 | 124.0 | 152.3 |
竹凉席 Bamboo mat | 1 500 mm×4.5 mm×2.0 mm | 31.0 | 178.1 | 32.1 | 303.8 | 129.0 | 112.2 |
Table 2
Carbon footprints of particleboard products calculated by different methods"
碳足迹评价方法 Carbon footprint methodologies | 从摇篮到大门阶段的碳足迹 Cradle-to-gate carbon footprints/(kg·m?3) | 从摇篮到坟墓阶段的碳足迹 Cradle-to-grave carbon footprints/(kg·m?3) | |
生命末期采用焚烧处理方式 Incineration is used at the end of life | 生命末期采用填埋处理方式 Landfill is used at the end of life | ||
ISO/TS 14067 | 188 | 140 | 433(?1 092) |
PAS 2050 | ?939 | 189 | ?692 |
GHG Protocol | ?913 | 113 | ?682 |
气候宣言 Climate declaration | 168 | 201 | 287 |
陈 硕, 胡继梅, 沈乃强, 等. 强化木地板的“碳足迹”计算分析. 木材工业, 2014, 28 (2): 36- 38.
doi: 10.19455/j.mcgy.2014.02.011 |
|
Chen S, Hu J M, Shen N Q, et al. “Carbon footprint” calculation and analysis for laminate flooring. China Wood Industry, 2014, 28 (2): 36- 38.
doi: 10.19455/j.mcgy.2014.02.011 |
|
李俊峰, 李 广. 碳中和: 中国发展转型的机遇与挑战. 环境与可持续发展, 2021, 46 (1): 50- 57. | |
Li J F, Li G. Carbon neutrality: opportunities and challenges for development transformation in China. Environment and Sustainable Development, 2021, 46 (1): 50- 57. | |
吕 倩. 2020. 中国能源消费碳排放时空演变特征及减排策略研究. 北京: 中国矿业大学. | |
Lü Q. 2020. Study on spatiotemporal dynamic characteristics and reduction strategy of energy consumption carbon emissions in China. Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology. [in Chinese] | |
王珊珊, 杨红强. 2019. 基于国际碳足迹标准的中国人造板产业碳减排路径研究. 中国人口·资源与环境, 29(4): 27-37. | |
Wang S S, Yang H Q. 2019. Study on carbon emission reduction path of China’s wood-based panel industry based on international carbon footprint standards. China Population, Resources and Environment, 29(4): 27-37. [in Chinese] | |
许培玉, 朱建君, 徐霄枭, 等. 竹建筑材料全生命周期碳足迹测算及碳汇优势研究. 人民长江, 2023, 54 (5): 88- 93.
doi: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2023.05.012 |
|
Xu P Y, Zhu J J, Xu X X, et al. Whole-life carbon footprint measurement and carbon sink advantages of bamboo construction materials. Yangtze River, 2023, 54 (5): 88- 93.
doi: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2023.05.012 |
|
周国模, 顾 蕾. 2017. 竹材产品碳储量与碳足迹研究. 北京: 科学出版社, 135-136. | |
Zhou G M, Gu L. 2017. Carbon stocks and carbon footprint of bamboo timber products. Beijing: Science Press, 135-136.[in Chinese] | |
周鹏飞, 顾 蕾, 彭维亮, 等. 竹展开砧板碳足迹计测及构成分析. 浙江农林大学学报, 2014, 31 (6): 860- 867.
doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.06.006 |
|
Zhou P F, Gu L, Peng W L, et al. A carbon footprint assessment and composition analysis of flattened bamboo chopping board. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2014, 31 (6): 860- 867.
doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.06.006 |
|
Alvarez S, Rubio A. Compound method based on financial accounts versus process-based analysis in product carbon footprint: a comparison using wood pallets. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 49, 88- 94.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.10.005 |
|
Alvarez S, Tobarra M A, Zafrilla J E. Corporate and product carbon footprint under compound hybrid analysis: application to a Spanish timber company. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2019, 23 (2): 496- 507.
doi: 10.1111/jiec.12759 |
|
Bergman R D. 2012. The effect on climate change impacts for building products when including the timing of greenhouse gas emissions. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin-Madison. | |
Bergman R D. 2014. Life-cycle inventory analysis of cellulosic fiberboard production in north America. Proceedings, Society of Wood Science and Technology 57th International Convention, Zvolen, Slovakia, 542-550. | |
Bergman R D, Gu H, Falk R H, et al. 2010. Using reclaimed lumber and wood flooring in construction: measuring environmental impact using life-cycle inventory analysis. Proceedings of the International Convention of Society of Wood Science and Technology and United Nations Economic Commission for Europe-Timber Committee, Geneva, Switzerland, 11. | |
Bowers T, Puettmann M E, Ganguly I, et al. Cradle-to-gate life-cycle impact analysis of glued-laminated (glulam) timber: environmental impacts from glulam produced in the US Pacific northwest and southeast. Forest Products Journal, 2017, 67 (5/6): 368- 380. | |
Brandão M, Levasseur A, Kirschbaum M U F, et al. Key issues and options in accounting for carbon sequestration and temporary storage in life cycle assessment and carbon footprinting. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 (1): 230- 240.
doi: 10.1007/s11367-012-0451-6 |
|
Carrano A L, Thorn B K, Woltag H. Characterizing the carbon footprint of wood pallet logistics. Forest Products Journal, 2014, 64 (7/8): 232- 241. | |
Chang F C, Chen K S, Yang P Y, et al. Environmental benefit of utilizing bamboo material based on life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 204, 60- 69.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.248 |
|
Chang Y S, Kim S, Son W L, et al. Assessment of carbon emission for quantification of environmental load on structural glued laminated timber in Korea. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology, 2016, 44 (3): 449- 456.
doi: 10.5658/WOOD.2016.44.3.449 |
|
Chen X, Chen F, Yang Q, et al. An environmental food packaging material part I: a case study of life-cycle assessment (LCA) for bamboo fiber environmental tableware. Industrial Crops and Products, 2023, 194, 116279.
doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116279 |
|
Corradini G, Pierobon F, Zanetti M. Product environmental footprint of a cross-laminated timber system: a case study in Italy. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2019, 24 (5): 975- 988.
doi: 10.1007/s11367-018-1541-x |
|
Demertzi M, Garrido A, Dias A C, et al. Environmental performance of a cork floating floor. Materials & Design, 2015a, 82, 317- 325. | |
Demertzi M, Dias A C, Matos A, et al. Evaluation of different end-of-life management alternatives for used natural cork stoppers through life cycle assessment. Waste Management, 2015b, 46, 668- 680.
doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.09.026 |
|
Demertzi M, Paulo J A, Faias S P, et al. Evaluating the carbon footprint of the cork sector with a dynamic approach including biogenic carbon flows. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 (7): 1448- 1459.
doi: 10.1007/s11367-017-1406-8 |
|
Demertzi M, Sierra-Pérez J, Paulo J A, et al. Environmental performance of expanded cork slab and granules through life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 145, 294- 302.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.071 |
|
Erdil M, Yilgor N, Gungor Y. Evaluation of carbon footprint for wood based panel industry in Turkey. Pressacademia, 2017, 5 (1): 10- 18.
doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.564 |
|
Erdil M, Yilgor N. An assessment of carbon footprint in medium-density fiberboard (MDF) manufacturing: a case study of wood based panel production in Turkey. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 2020, 5 (5): 841- 848.
doi: 10.35229/jaes.836311 |
|
Espiritu-Cabral D, Racelis D, Predo C, et al. Carbon footprint of lumber production from falcata [Falcataria moluccana (Miq. ) Barneby & JW Grimes] in the CARAGA region, Philippines. Ecosystems and Development Journal, 2020, 10 (1/2): 50- 55. | |
Ganne-Chédeville C, Diederichs S. Potential environmental benefits of ultralight particleboards with biobased foam cores. International Journal of Polymer Science, 2015, (1): 1- 14. | |
García R, Freire F. Carbon footprint of particleboard: a comparison between ISO/TS 14067, GHG Protocol, PAS 2050 and Climate Declaration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 66, 199- 209.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.073 |
|
Gu L, Zhou Y F, Mei T T, et al. Carbon footprint analysis of bamboo scrimber flooring—implications for carbon sequestration of bamboo forests and its products. Forests, 2019, 10 (1): 51.
doi: 10.3390/f10010051 |
|
Hafezi S M, Zarea-Hosseinabadi H, Huijbregts M A J, et al. The importance of biogenic carbon storage in the greenhouse gas footprint of medium density fiberboard from poplar wood and bagasse. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 2021, 3, 100066.
doi: 10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100066 |
|
Halava S. 2013. Carbon footprint of thermowood. Satakunnan Ammattikorkeakoulu. | |
Hassan O A B, Johansson C. 2018. Glued laminated timber and steel beams: a comparative study of structural design, economic and environmental consequences. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 16(3): 398-417. | |
Hossain M U, Wang L, Yu I, et al. Environmental and technical feasibility study of upcycling wood waste into cement-bonded particleboard. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 173, 474- 480.
doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.066 |
|
Hu S Y, Guan X, Guo M H, et al. Environmental load of solid wood floor production from larch grown at different planting densities based on a life cycle assessment. Journal of Forestry Research, 2018, 29 (5): 1443- 1448.
doi: 10.1007/s11676-017-0529-x |
|
Hussain M, Malik R N, Taylor A. Carbon footprint as an environmental sustainability indicator for the particleboard produced in Pakistan. Environmental Research, 2017, 155, 385- 393.
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.02.024 |
|
Kaestner D. 2017. Compile a life cycle assessment of the OSB and plywood industries in the US & analysis of the OSB and plywood industries in the US based on a life cycle assessment. Tennessee: University of Tennessee. | |
Knight L, Huff M, Stockhausen J I, et al. Comparing energy use and environmental emissions of reinforced wood doors and steel doors. Forest Products Journal, 2005, 55 (6): 48- 52. | |
Ks G A N, Massijaya M Y. 2014. Life cycle assessment for environmental product declaration of tropical plywood production in Malaysia and Indonesia. Report: Prepared for International Tropical Timber Organization. | |
Kujanpää M, Pajula T, Hohenthal C. Carbon footprint of a forest product–challenges of including biogenic carbon and carbon sequestration in the calculations. Life Cycle Assessment of Products and Technologies, 2009, 15 (3): 27- 39. | |
Lan K, Kelley S S, Nepal P, et al. Dynamic life cycle carbon and energy analysis for cross-laminated timber in the Southeastern United States. Environmental Research Letters, 2020, 15 (12): 124036.
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/abc5e6 |
|
Lao W L, Chang L. Greenhouse gas footprint assessment of wood-based panel production in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 389, 136064.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136064 |
|
Martínez-Alonso C, Berdasco L. Carbon footprint of sawn timber products of Castanea sativa Mill. in the north of Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 102, 127- 135.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.004 |
|
Murphy F, Devlin G, McDonnell K. Greenhouse gas and energy based life cycle analysis of products from the Irish wood processing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 92, 134- 141.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.001 |
|
Nakano K, Ando K, Takigawa M, et al. Life cycle assessment of wood-based boards produced in Japan and impact of formaldehyde emissions during the use stage. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 (4): 957- 969.
doi: 10.1007/s11367-017-1343-6 |
|
Nakano K, Koike W, Yamagishi K, et al. Environmental impacts of cross-laminated timber production in Japan. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2020, 22 (10): 2193- 2205.
doi: 10.1007/s10098-020-01948-2 |
|
Nebel B, Zimmer B, Wegener G. Life cycle assessment of wood floor coverings-a representative study for the German flooring industry. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2006, 11 (3): 172- 182.
doi: 10.1065/lca2004.10.187 |
|
Ng R, Shi C W P, Low J S C, et al. 2011. Comparative carbon footprint assessment of door made from recycled wood waste versus virgin hardwood: case study of a Singapore wood waste recycling plant. Glocalized Solutions for Sustainability in Manufacturing, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 629-634. | |
Ng R, Shi C W P, Tan H X, et al. Avoided impact quantification from recycling of wood waste in Singapore: an assessment of pallet made from technical wood versus virgin softwood. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 65, 447- 457.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.053 |
|
Nordlund T. 2015. Carbon footprint of thermowood. Satakunnan Ammattikorkeakoulu. | |
O'Connor J. 2009. Considerations for environmental footprinting of wood doors. FPInnovations-Forintek, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 28. | |
Petersen A K, Solberg B. Greenhouse gas emissions and costs over the life cycle of wood and alternative flooring materials. Climatic Change, 2004, 64 (1): 143- 167. | |
Phuong V T, Xuan N V. Life cycle assessment for key bamboo products in Viet Nam. International Network for Bamboo and Rattan (INBAR), 2020, Beijing, 57. | |
Ratnasingam J, Ramasamy G, Toong W, et al. An assessment of the carbon footprint of tropical hardwood sawn timber production. BioResources, 2015, 10 (3): 5174- 5190. | |
Sahoo K, Bergman R, Khatri P. Cradle-to-grave life-cycle assessment of cellulosic fiberboard. Recent Progress in Materials, 2021, 3 (4): 1- 27. | |
Shang X Y, Song S Q, Yang J W. Comparative environmental evaluation of straw resources by LCA in China. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, 2020, 1- 16. | |
Sinha A, Kutnar A. Carbon footprint versus performance of aluminum, plastic, and wood window frames from cradle to gate. Buildings, 2012, 2 (4): 542- 553.
doi: 10.3390/buildings2040542 |
|
Sinha R, Lennartsson M, Frostell B. Environmental footprint assessment of building structures: a comparative study. Building and Environment, 2016, 104, 162- 171.
doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.05.012 |
|
Tarantini M, Dominici Loprieno A, Porta P L. A life cycle approach to Green Public Procurement of building materials and elements: a case study on windows. Energy, 2011, 36 (5): 2473- 2482.
doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.01.039 |
|
Tártaro A S S. 2016. Life cycle assessment methodology of ICB and the applications of cork powder in aroma elimination. Portugal: Universidade do Porto. | |
Tellnes L G, Ganne-Chedeville C, Dias A, et al. Comparative assessment for biogenic carbon accounting methods in carbon footprint of products: a review study for construction materials based on forest products. IForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 2017, 10 (5): 815- 823.
doi: 10.3832/ifor2386-010 |
|
Tellnes L G F, Gobakken L R, Flæte P O, et al. Carbon footprint including effect of carbon storage for selected wooden facade materials. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 2014, 9 (3): 139- 143. | |
Tellnes L G F, Alfredsen G, Flæte P O, et al. Effect of service life aspects on carbon footprint: a comparison of wood decking products. Holzforschung, 2020a, 74 (4): 426- 433.
doi: 10.1515/hf-2019-0055 |
|
Tellnes L G F, Nyrud A Q, Flaete P O. 2012. Carbon footprint of products from the Norwegian sawmilling industry. Scandinavian Forest Economics: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, 152-158. | |
Tellnes L G F, Saxegård S A, Johnsen F M. Cross-laminated timber constructions in a sustainable future-transition to fossil free and carbon capture technologies. IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science, 2020b, 588 (4): 042060.
doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/588/4/042060 |
|
Vogtlander J G, van der Lugt P. The environmental impact of industrial bamboo products: life-cycle assessment and carbon sequestration. The International Network for Bamboo and Rattan, 2015, 35, 57. | |
Wang S S, Wang W F, Yang H Q. Comparison of product carbon footprint protocols: case study on medium-density fiberboard in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15 (10): 2060.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102060 |
|
Weir G, Muneer T. Energy and environmental impact analysis of double-glazed windows. Energy Conversion and Management, 1998, 39 (3/4): 243- 256. | |
Vamza I, Diaz F, Resnais P, et al. Life cycle assessment of reprocessed cross laminated timber in Latvia. Environmental and Climate Technologies, 2021, 25 (1): 58- 70.
doi: 10.2478/rtuect-2021-0005 |
|
Vaňová R, Štefko J. Assessment of selected types of the structural engineered wood production from the environmental point of view. Acta Facultatis Xylologiae Zvolen res Publica Slovaca, 2021, 63 (2): 117- 130. | |
Xiao Y, Yang R Z, Shan B. Production, environmental impact and mechanical properties of glubam. Construction and Building Materials, 2013, 44, 765- 773.
doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.087 |
[1] | Weisheng Zeng,Ying Pu,Xueyun Yang,Shanjun Yi. Growth Models and Its Climate-Driven Analysis of Carbon Storage in Tree Layers of Five Major Plantation Types in China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(3): 21-30. |
[2] | Yuxing Zhang,Xuejun Wang. Productivity and Carbon Sink Capacity of Eucalyptus Plantations in China from 1973 to 2018 [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(3): 54-64. |
[3] | Xiaobiao Zhang,Fei Lu,Hongqiang Yang,Zhiyun Ouyang. Dynamics and Prospect of Studies on Pathways of Reduction of Post-Harvest Carbon Emission from Forest [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(8): 182-196. |
[4] | Zhikang Hou,Songwei Zeng,Lufeng Mo,Yufeng Zhou. CO2 Concentration in Phyllostachys praecox Stand Inversion Based on GA-BP Neural Network [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(2): 42-48. |
[5] | Xuefeng Wang,Zhulin Chen,Qingjun Guan,Jiazheng Liu,Tian Wang,Ying Yuan. Estimation Method of Carbon Stock Per Unit Area Based on Forest Image [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(1): 105-112. |
[6] | Zhenpeng Wang,Jinlei Chen,Shangyi Li,Shiji Zhang,Xi Fang. Characteristics of Forest Ecosystem Carbon Stocks at Different Vegetation Restoration Stages in Hilly Area of Central Hunan Province, China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(5): 19-28. |
[7] | Wanze Zhu. Advances in the Carbon Sequestration of Mature Forests [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(3): 117-126. |
[8] | Wang Zhikang, Xu Chenyang, Geng Zengchao, Liu Lili, Hou Lin, Du Can, Wang Qiang, Lü Dongwei. Characteristics of Soil Organic Carbon Density in Two Stands of Xinjiashan in Qinling Mountains Based on a New Method of Deducting Root Volume [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(6): 133-141. |
[9] | Shi Yan, Ge Ying, Jin Hexian, Ren Yuan, Qu Zelong, Bao Zhiyi, Chang Jie. Progress in Studies on Carbon Sequestration of Urban Vegetation [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(6): 122-129. |
[10] | Qi Yujiao, Li Fengri. Remote Sensing Estimation of Aboveground Forest Carbon Storage in Daxing'an Mountains Based on KNN Method [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(5): 46-55. |
[11] | Li Chong, Zhou Guomo, Shi Yongjun, Zhou Yufeng, Zhang Yupeng, Shen Lifen, Fan Yeqing, Shen Zhenming. Effects of Different Management Measures on Soil Carbon in Bamboo Forest Ecosystems [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(4): 26-35. |
[12] | Guo Minghui, Qin Lei. Radial Variation of the Wood Carbon Storage and Physical Characteristics of the Planted Pinus koraiensis [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(1): 97-102. |
[13] | Huang Guosheng, Ma Wei, Wang Xuejun, Xia Chaozong, Dang Yongfeng. Carbon Storage Measurement of Larch Forest in Northeastern China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(6): 167-174. |
[14] | Wang Changwei, Hu Yueming, Shen Decai, Huang Shengli, Zhu Jianyun, Wang Lu. Assessing the Capability of CBERS-02 B CCD for Estimating Subtropical Forest above Ground Carbon Storage [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(1): 88-96. |
[15] | Xu Xiaojun, Zhou Guomo, Du Huaqiang, Zhou Yufeng, Hu Junguo, Lu Guofu. Effects of Sample Plots Stratification on Estimation Accuracy of Aboveground Carbon Storage for Phyllostachys edulis Forests [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2013, 49(6): 18-24. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||