Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (3): 31-43.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20220607
• Frontier & focus: forestry carbon sink capacity improvement driven by carbon peak and carbon neutrality policies • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xingchang Wang1,Fan Liu2,Xue Sun1,Zhen Jiao3,Xiaofeng Sun1,4,Quanzhi Zhang1,Xiankui Quan1,Chuankuan Wang1,*
Received:
2022-09-06
Online:
2023-03-25
Published:
2023-05-27
Contact:
Chuankuan Wang
CLC Number:
Xingchang Wang,Fan Liu,Xue Sun,Zhen Jiao,Xiaofeng Sun,Quanzhi Zhang,Xiankui Quan,Chuankuan Wang. Intercomparison of Carbon Fluxes Measured with Eddy Covariance and Inventory Methods in Temperate Secondary Forest[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(3): 31-43.
Table 1
Interannual fluctuation and uncertainty of CO2 flux from 2008 to 2018 based on EC method"
年Year | NEE/ (t?hm?2 a?1) | GPP/ (t?hm?2 a?1) | Re/(t?hm?2 a?1) | Ta/℃ | PPT/mm |
2008 | ?1.31 ± 0.33 | 11.30 ± 0.64 | 9.99 ± 0.97 | 2.96 (15.52) | 421 (378) |
2009 | ?0.39 ± 0.36 | 12.46 ± 0.71 | 12.07 ± 1.06 | 1.56 (15.04) | 546 (443) |
2010 | ?1.99 ± 0.37 | 11.88 ± 0.84 | 9.90 ± 1.21 | 0.97 (15.96) | 454 (220) |
2011 | ?2.08 ± 0.46 | 12.15 ± 0.88 | 10.07 ± 1.34 | 1.45 (14.99) | 505 (393) |
2012 | ?2.34 ± 0.43 | 14.66 ± 0.79 | 12.32 ± 1.22 | 1.00 (15.58) | 745 (497) |
2013 | ?2.22 ± 0.58 | 14.65 ± 1.26 | 12.42 ± 1.85 | 1.66 (16.12) | 936 (699) |
2014 | ?1.97 ± 0.55 | 15.41 ± 1.08 | 13.44 ± 1.63 | 2.81 (15.86) | 617 (541) |
2015 | ?1.44 ± 0.57 | 13.68 ± 1.02 | 12.24 ± 1.59 | 2.92 (15.59) | 829 (682) |
2016 | ?1.23 ± 0.53 | 14.14 ± 0.97 | 12.91 ± 1.49 | 2.01 (15.91) | 676 (562) |
2017 | ?1.63 ± 0.33 | 14.66 ± 0.58 | 13.03 ± 0.89 | 2.45 (15.70) | 633 (530) |
2018 | ?0.62 ± 0.54 | 14.22 ± 0.97 | 13.60 ± 1.50 | 2.56 (16.38) | 1077 (914) |
平均值±标准差Mean ± SD | ?1.57 ± 0.64 | 13.56 ± 1.48 | 12.00 ± 1.38 | 2.03 ± 0.75(15.70 ± 0.42) | 676 ± 206(533 ± 186) |
CV (%) | 40.95 | 10.15 | 11.50 | 36.84 (2.68) | 30.39 (34.96) |
绝对不确定性Uncertainty | 0.47 | 0.90 | 1.37 | — | — |
相对不确定性Relative uncertainty(%) | 29.9% | 6.6 | 11.4 | — | — |
Table 2
Litterfall production, litterfall carbon concentration and canopy net primary production and their uncertainties"
凋落物组分Litterfall component | 凋落物产量Litterfall mass/(t?hm?2 a?1) | 含碳率Carbon concentration/(%DM) | 冠层净初级生产力Canopy net primary production/(t?hm?2 a?1) |
叶Leaf | 3.49 ± 0.25 (7.1%) | 47.19 ± 1.27 (2.7%) | 1.65 ± 0.12 (7.1%) |
小枝Twig | 0.82 ± 0.15 (18.6%) | 48.56 ± 1.06 (2.2%) | 0.40 ± 0.07 (18.6%) |
繁殖器官Reproductive organs | 0.22 ± 0.07 (30.8%) | 47.57 ± 1.36 (2.9%) | 0.11 ± 0.03 (30.8%) |
其他Miscellaneous | 0.35 ± 0.04 (11.3%) | 47.62 ± 1.80 (3.8%) | 0.17 ± 0.02 (11.3%) |
总Total | 4.88 ± 0.30 (6.2%) | 47.47 ± 1.27 (2.7%) | 2.32 ± 0.14 (6.4%) |
Table 6
Carbon fluxes of the natural secondary forest ecosystem and their uncertainties"
碳通量组分或参数Carbon flux component or parameter | 估计值Estimate | 不确定性Uncertainty | 相对不确定性Relative uncertainty(%) |
净生态系统交换Net ecosystem exchange/ (t?hm?2 a?1) | ?1.57 | 0.47 | 29.9 |
总初级生产力Gross primary production/ (t?hm?2 a?1) | 13.56 | 0.90 | 6.6 |
生态系统呼吸Ecosystem respiration/ (t?hm?2 a?1) | 12.00 | 1.37 | 11.4 |
净初级生产力Net primary production/ (t?hm?2 a?1) | 7.54 | 1.31 | 17.4 |
冠层净初级生产力Net primary production of canopy/ (t?hm?2 a?1) | 2.32 | 0.14 | 6.0 |
木质组织净初级生产力Net primary production of woody tissue/(t ?hm?2 a?1) | 2.36 | 0.14 | 5.9 |
细根净初级生产力Net primary production of fine roots/(t?hm?2 a?1) | 2.47 | 1.29 | 52.2 |
林下植被净初级生产力Net primary production of understory/(t ?hm?2 a?1) | 0.39 | 0.04 | 9.2 |
土壤呼吸通量Soil respiration/ (t?hm?2 a?1) | 8.31 | 0.32 | 3.9 |
土壤异养呼吸Soil heterotrophic respiration/(t?hm?2 a?1) | 5.23 | 0.20 | 3.8 |
粗木质残体呼吸Respiration of coarse woody debris /(t ?hm?2 a?1) | 0.37 | 0.21 | 56.8 |
异养呼吸Heterotrophic respiration/(t?hm?2 a?1) | 5.60 | 0.29 | 5.2 |
净生态系统生产力Net ecosystem production /(t?hm?2 a?1) | 1.94 | 1.34 | 69.1 |
地下碳分配Total belowground carbon allocation/ (t?hm?2 a?1) | 5.99 | 0.35 | 5.8 |
土壤呼吸/生态系统呼吸比值The ratio of soil respiration to ecosystem respiration (%) | 69.25 | 8.34 | 12.0 |
植被碳利用效率The ratio of net primary production to gross primary production (%) | 55.60 | 10.34 | 18.6 |
生态系统碳利用效率The ratio of negative value of net ecosystem exchange to gross primary production (%) | 11.58 | 3.55 | 30.7 |
陈世苹, 游翠海, 胡中民, 等 涡度相关技术及其在陆地生态系统通量研究中的应用. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44 (4): 291- 304.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2019.0351 |
|
Chen S P, You C H, Hu Z M, et al Eddy covariance technique and its applications in flux observations of terrestrial ecosystems. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2020, 44 (4): 291- 304.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2019.0351 |
|
傅 煜. 2015. 区域尺度森林地上生物量的不确定性度量研究. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院. | |
Fu Y. 2015. Uncertainty assessment for regional-level forest above-ground biomass estimates. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry. [in Chinese] | |
焦 振. 2019. 帽儿山温带森林土壤呼吸组分时空动态及其影响因子. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学. | |
Jiao Z. 2019. Spatiotemporal dynamics in soil respiration components of the temperate forests in the Maoershan region of Northeast China. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University. [in Chinese] | |
李颖池, 刘 帆, 王传宽, 等 CO2储存通量测算方法对森林生态系统碳收支估测的影响 . 应用生态学报, 2020, 31 (11): 3665- 3673. | |
Li Y C, Liu F, Wang C K, et al Carbon budget estimation based on different methods of CO2 storage flux in forest ecosystems . Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31 (11): 3665- 3673. | |
刘 帆, 王传宽, 王兴昌, 等 帽儿山温带落叶阔叶林通量塔风浪区生物量空间格局. 生态学报, 2016, 36 (20): 6506- 6519. | |
Liu F, Wang C K, Wang X C, et al Spatial patterns of biomass in the temperate broadleaved deciduous forest within the fetch of the Maoershan flux tower. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36 (20): 6506- 6519. | |
朴世龙, 岳 超, 丁金枝, 等 试论陆地生态系统碳汇在“碳中和”目标中的作用. 中国科学 地球科学, 2022, 65 (6): 1178- 1186.
doi: 10.1007/s11430-022-9926-6 |
|
Piao S L, Yue C, Ding J Z, et al Perspectives on the role of terrestrial ecosystems in the "carbon neutrality" strategy. Science China Earth Sciences, 2022, 65 (6): 1178- 1186.
doi: 10.1007/s11430-022-9926-6 |
|
秦立厚. 2017. 浙江省森林碳储量估算不确定性研究. 杭州: 浙江农林大学. | |
Qin L H. 2017. Uncertainty of forest carbon storage estimation in Zhejiang Province. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Agriculture & Forestry University. [in Chinese] | |
孙晓凤. 2021. 帽儿山天然次生林净初级生产力估算及其不确定性. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学. | |
Sun X F. 2021. Estimation of net primary productivity and its uncertainty of a natural secondary forest in Maoershan. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University. [in Chinese] | |
王兴昌, 王传宽 森林生态系统碳循环的基本概念和野外测定方法评述. 生态学报, 2015, 35 (13): 4241- 4256. | |
Wang X C, Wang C K Fundamental concepts and field measurement methods of carbon cycling in forest ecosystems: a review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35 (13): 4241- 4256. | |
王 淼, 关德新, 王跃思, 等. 2006. 长白山红松针阔叶混交林生态系统生产力的估算. 中国科学: 地球科学, 36(增刊I): 70−82. | |
Wang M, Guan D X, Wang Y S, et al. 2006. Estimate of productivity in ecosystem of the broad-leaved Korean pine mixed forest in Changbai Mountain. Scientia Sinica(Terrae), 36(Sup I): 70−82 [in Chinese] | |
于贵瑞, 张雷明, 孙晓敏 中国陆地生态系统通量观测研究网络(ChinaFLUX)的主要进展及发展展望. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33 (7): 903- 917.
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.07.005 |
|
Yu G R, Zhang L M, Sun X M Progresses and prospects of Chinese terrestrial ecosystem flux observation and research network (ChinaFLUX). Progress in Geography, 2014, 33 (7): 903- 917.
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.07.005 |
|
张利敏, 王传宽 东北东部山区11种温带树种粗木质残体分解与碳氮释放. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34 (4): 368- 374.
doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.04.002 |
|
Zhang L M, Wang C K Carbon and nitrogen release during decomposition of coarse woody debris for eleven temperate tree species in the eastern mountain region of northeast China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34 (4): 368- 374.
doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.04.002 |
|
张全智, 王传宽 6种温带森林碳密度与碳分配. 中国科学 生命科学, 2010, 53 (7): 831- 840.
doi: 10.1007/s11427-010-4026-0 |
|
Zhang Q Z, Wang C K Carbon density and distribution of six Chinese temperate forests. Science China Life Sciences, 2010, 53 (7): 831- 840.
doi: 10.1007/s11427-010-4026-0 |
|
张云宇, 孙晓凤, 张临峰, 等 帽儿山温带落叶阔叶林细根生物量、生产力和周转率. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32 (9): 3053- 3060.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202109.001 |
|
Zhang Y Y, Sun X F, Zhang L F, et al Fine root biomass, production, and turnover rate in a temperate deciduous broadleaved forest in the Maoer Mountain, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32 (9): 3053- 3060.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202109.001 |
|
赵 瑞, 王传宽, 全先奎, 等 黑龙江省帽儿山温带阔叶树种不同器官的生态化学计量特征. 林业科学, 2021, 57 (2): 1- 11.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210201 |
|
Zhao R, Wang C K, Quan X K, et al Ecological stoichiometric characteristics of different organs of broadleaf tree species in a temperate forest in Mao'ershan area, Heilongjiang Province. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57 (2): 1- 11.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210201 |
|
Aceñolaza, P G, Zamboni L P, Rodriguez E E, et al Litterfall production in forests located at the Pre-delta area of the Paraná River (Argentina). Annals of Forest Science, 2010, 67 (3): 311.
doi: 10.1051/forest/2009117 |
|
Addo-Danso S D, Prescott C E, Smith A R Methods for estimating root biomass and production in forest and woodland ecosystem carbon studies: A review. Forest Ecology and Management, 2016, 359, 332- 351.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.08.015 |
|
Ahlström A, Raupach M, Schurgers G, et al The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO2 sink . Science, 2015, 348 (6237): 895- 899.
doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1668 |
|
Aubinet M, Vesala T, Papale D. 2012. Eddy covariance: a practical guide to measurement and data analysis. Springer | |
Bain W G, Hutyra L, Patterson D C, et al Wind-induced error in the measurement of soil respiration using closed dynamic chambers. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2005, 131 (3/4): 225- 232.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.06.004 |
|
Baldocchi D Measuring fluxes of trace gases and energy between ecosystems and the atmosphere-the state and future of the eddy covariance method. Global Change Biology, 2014, 20 (12): 3600- 3609.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.12649 |
|
Baldocchi D, Chu H, Reichstein M Inter-annual variability of net and gross ecosystem carbon fluxes: a review. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2018, 249, 520- 533.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.05.015 |
|
Baldocchi D D Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: past, present and future. Global Change Biology, 2003, 9 (4): 479- 492.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00629.x |
|
Beets P, Kimberley M, Oliver G, et al Allometric equations for estimating carbon stocks in natural forest in New Zealand. Forests, 2012, 3 (4): 818- 839. | |
Cai H, Di X, Chang S, Wang C, et al Carbon storage, net primary production, and net ecosystem production in four major temperate forest types in northeastern China. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2016, 46 (2): 143- 151.
doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2015-0038 |
|
Campioli M, Malhi Y, Vicca S, et al Evaluating the convergence between eddy-covariance and biometric methods for assessing carbon budgets of forests. Nature Communications, 2016, 7, 13717.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms13717 |
|
Chave J, Condit R, Aguilar S, et al. 2004. Error propagation and scaling for tropical forest biomass estimates. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological sciences, 359(1443): 409-420. | |
Chen H Y H, Brant A N, Seedre M, et al The contribution of litterfall to net primary production during secondary succession in the boreal forest. Ecosystems, 2017, 20 (4): 830- 844.
doi: 10.1007/s10021-016-0063-2 |
|
Chen J M Carbon neutrality: toward a sustainable future. Innovation, 2021, 2 (3): 100127. | |
Collalti A, Prentice I C Is NPP proportional to GPP? Waring’s hypothesis 20 years on. Tree Physiology, 2019, 39 (8): 1473- 1483.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpz034 |
|
Cook-Patton S C. Leavitt S M, Gibbs D, et al Mapping carbon accumulation potential from global natural forest regrowth. Nature, 2020, 585 (7826): 545- 550.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2686-x |
|
Fei, X H, Jin Y Q, Zhang Y P, et al Eddy covariance and biometric measurements show that a savanna ecosystem in Southwest China is a carbon sink. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7, 41025.
doi: 10.1038/srep41025 |
|
Finzi A C., Giasson MA, Plotkin A A B, et al Carbon budget of the Harvard Forest Long-Term Ecological Research site: pattern, process, and response to global change. Ecological Monographs, 2020, 90 (4): e01423. | |
Girardin C A J, Aragão L E O C, Malhi Y, et al Fine root dynamics along an elevational gradient in tropical Amazonian and Andean forests. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2013, 27 (1): 252- 264.
doi: 10.1029/2011GB004082 |
|
Gough C M, Vogel C S, Schmid H P, et al Multi-year convergence of biometric and meteorological estimates of forest carbon storage. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2008, 148 (2): 158- 170.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.08.004 |
|
Janssens I A, Lankreijer H, Matteucci G, et al Productivity overshadows temperature in determining soil and ecosystem respiration across European forests. Global Change Biology, 2001, 7 (3): 269- 278.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00412.x |
|
Jia B R, Sun H R, Yu W Y, et al Quantifying the interannual litterfall variations in China’s forest ecosystems. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2020, 13 (3): 266- 272.
doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtaa010 |
|
Jiao Z, Wang X C Contrasting rhizospheric and heterotrophic components of soil respiration during growing and non-growing seasons in a temperate deciduous forest. Forests, 2019, 10 (1): 8. | |
Ketterings Q M, Coe R, van Noordwijk M, et al Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 2001, 146 (1): 199- 209. | |
Lauenroth W, Wade A, Williamson M, et al Uncertainty in calculations of net primary production for grasslands. Ecosystems, 2006, 9, 843- 851.
doi: 10.1007/s10021-005-0072-z |
|
Liu F, Wang X C, Wang C K, et al Environmental and biotic controls on the interannual variations in CO2 fluxes of a continental monsoon temperate forest . Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2021, 296, 108232.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108232 |
|
Loescher H W, Law B E, Mahrt L, et al Uncertainties in, and interpretation of, carbon flux estimates using the eddy covariance technique. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 2006, 111, D21S90. | |
Luyssaert S, Inglima I, Jung M, et al CO2 balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database . Global Change Biology, 2007, 13 (12): 2509- 2537.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01439.x |
|
Mason N, Beets P, Payton I, et al Individual-based allometric equations accurately measure carbon storage and sequestration in shrublands. Forests, 2014, 5 (2): 309- 324.
doi: 10.3390/f5020309 |
|
Melson S L, Harmon M E, Fried J S, et al Estimates of live-tree carbon stores in the Pacific Northwest are sensitive to model selection. Carbon Balance and Management, 2011, 6 (1): 2.
doi: 10.1186/1750-0680-6-2 |
|
Moncrieff J B, Malhi Y, Leuning R The propagation of errors in long‐term measurements of land-atmosphere fluxes of carbon and water. Global Change Biology, 1996, 2 (3): 231- 240.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.1996.tb00075.x |
|
Niu S L, Fu Z, Luo Y Q, et al Interannual variability of ecosystem carbon exchange: from observation to prediction. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2017, 26 (11): 1225- 1237.
doi: 10.1111/geb.12633 |
|
Noormets A, Desai A R, Cook B D, et al Moisture sensitivity of ecosystem respiration: comparison of 14 forest ecosystems in the Upper Great Lakes Region, USA. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2008, 148 (2): 216- 230.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.08.002 |
|
Piao S L, Wang X H, Wang K, et al Interannual variation of terrestrial carbon cycle: issues and perspectives. Global Change Biology, 2019, 26 (1): 300- 318. | |
Redeker K R, Baird A J, Teh Y A Quantifying wind and pressure effects on trace gas fluxes across the soil-atmosphere interface. Biogeosciences, 2015, 12 (24): 7423- 7434.
doi: 10.5194/bg-12-7423-2015 |
|
Scurlock J M O, Johnson K, Olson R J Estimating net primary productivity from grassland biomass dynamics measurements. Global Change Biology, 2002, 8 (8): 736- 753.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00512.x |
|
Steele S J, Gower S T, Vogel J G, et al Root mass, net primary production and turnover in aspen, jack pine and black spruce forests in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada. Tree Physiology, 1997, 17 (8/9): 577- 587. | |
Sun T, Dong L L, Mao Z J, et al Fine root dynamics of trees and understorey vegetation in a chronosequence of Betula platyphylla stands . Forest Ecology and Management, 2015, 346, 1- 9.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.02.035 |
|
Sun X F, Liu F, Zhang Q Z, et al Biotic and climatic controls on interannual variation in canopy litterfall of a species-rich deciduous broad-leaved forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2021, 307, 108483.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108483 |
|
Sun X, Wang X, Wang C, et al. 2022. Filling the “vertical gap” between canopy tree species and understory shrub species: biomass allometric equations for subcanopy tree species. Journal of Forestry Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-11022-01568-11670. | |
Tan Z H, Zhang Y P, Yu G R, et al Carbon balance of a primary tropical seasonal rain forest. Journal of Geophysical Research- Atmospheres, 2010, 115 (4): D00H26. | |
van Gorsel E, Delpierre N, Leuning R, et al Estimating nocturnal ecosystem respiration from the vertical turbulent flux and change in storage of CO2. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2009, 149 (11): 1919- 1930.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.06.020 |
|
Walker W S, Gorelik S R, Cook-Patton S C, et al. 2022. The global potential for increased storage of carbon on land. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(23): e2111312119. | |
Wang C K Biomass allometric equations for 10 co-occurring tree species in Chinese temperate forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, 222 (1/3): 9- 16.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.074 |
|
Wang C K, Han Y, Chen J Q, et al Seasonality of soil CO2 efflux in a temperate forest: biophysical effects of snowpack and spring freeze-thaw cycles . Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2013, 177, 83- 92.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.04.008 |
|
Wang C, Yang J, Zhang, Q Soil respiration in six temperate forests in China. Global Change Biology, 2006, 12 (11): 2103- 2114.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01234.x |
|
Wang X C, Wang C K, Guo Q X, et al Improving the CO2 storage measurements with a single profile system in a tall-dense-canopy temperate forest . Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2016, 228, 327- 338. | |
Wang X C, Wang C K, Bond-Lamberty B Quantifying and reducing the differences in forest CO2-fluxes estimated by eddy covariance, biometric and chamber methods: a global synthesis . Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2017, 247, 93- 103.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.07.023 |
|
Xu B, Yang Y H, Li P, et al Global patterns of ecosystem carbon flux in forests: a biometric data-based synthesis. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2014, 28 (9): 962- 973.
doi: 10.1002/2013GB004593 |
|
Yanai R D, See C R, Campbell J L Current practices in reporting uncertainty in ecosystem ecology. Ecosystems, 2018, 21, 971- 981.
doi: 10.1007/s10021-017-0197-x |
|
Yang, Y H, Shi Y, Sun W J, et al Terrestrial carbon sinks in China and around the world and their contribution to carbon neutrality. Science China-Life Sciences, 2022, 65 (5): 861- 895.
doi: 10.1007/s11427-021-2045-5 |
|
Yang Y, Yanai R D, See C R, et al Sampling effort and uncertainty in leaf litterfall mass and nutrient flux in northern hardwood forests. Ecosphere, 2017, 8 (11): e01999. | |
Yuan J, Jose S, Hu Z Y, et al Biometric and eddy covariance methods for examining the carbon balance of a Larix principis-rupprechtii forest in the Qinling Mountains, China . Forests, 2018, 9 (2): 67.
doi: 10.3390/f9020067 |
|
Yuan Z Y, Chen H Y Indirect methods produce higher estimates of fine root production and turnover rates than direct methods. PLoS One, 2012, 7 (11): e48989.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048989 |
|
Zapata-Cuartas M, Sierra C A, Alleman L Probability distribution of allometric coefficients and Bayesian estimation of aboveground tree biomass. Forest Ecology and Management, 2012, 277, 173- 179.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.030 |
[1] | Chunxiang Cheng,Min Yu,Zijun Mao,Lianni Xie,Yongcheng Zhang,Tao Sun,Zuomin Xu,Shuang Wu,Qianni Li,Jia Xu. Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Patterns of Abrupt Changs of NPP in Heilongjiang Province in the Process of Ecological Protection and Restoration in China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(7): 23-31. |
[2] | Xianglin Tian,Ziyan Liao,Shuaichao Sun,Hailian Xue,Bin Wang,Tianjian Cao. Impacts of Multiple Source Data on Forest Forecasting and Uncertainty Propagation [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(3): 51-66. |
[3] | Bin Wang,Xianglin Tian,Tianjian Cao. Uncertainty Analysis of Height Predictions for Young Pinus tabulaeformis Using a Bayesian Approach [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(11): 73-86. |
[4] | Mengting Yin,Botao Li,Bin Lü,Yuejin Fu,Fan Yang,Xianwu Zou. Influencing Factors and Uncertainty of Formaldehyde Emission in Wood-Based Panels by Desiccator Method [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(11): 159-167. |
[5] | Xiao He,Yuancai Lei,Chunquan Xue,Qihu Xu,Haikui Li,Lei Cao. Carbon Density Uncertainty Estimates for Schima superba in Guangdong Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(11): 163-171. |
[6] | Chen Liang, Zhou Guomo, Du Huaqiang, Liu Yuli, Mao Fangjie, Xu Xiaojun, Li Xuejian, Cui Lu, Li Yangguang, Zhu Di. Simulation of CO2 Flux and Controlling Factors in Moso Bamboo Forest Using Random Forest Algorithm [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(8): 1-12. |
[7] | Zhao Han, Lei Yuancai, Fu Liyong. Biomass and Uncertainty Estimates of Pinus massoniana Forest for Different Site Classes in Jiangxi Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(8): 81-93. |
[8] | Fu Yu, Lei Yuancai, Zeng Weisheng. Uncertainty Assessment in Regional-Scale Above Ground Biomass Estimation of Chinese Fir [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(12): 79-86. |
[9] | Yu Ying, Fan Wenyi, Yang Xiguang. Estimation of Forest NPP in Xiaoxing'an Mountains in 1901—2008 [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(10): 16-23. |
[10] | Zhao Zhonghui;Zhang Liping;Kang Wenxing;Tian Dalun;Xiang Wenhua;Yan Wende;Peng Changhui;. Characteristics of CO2 Flux in a Chinese Fir Plantation Ecosystem in Huitong County, Hunan Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47(11): 6-12. |
[11] | Wu Shuhong;Song Weiming. Sources of Uncertainty and its Estimating Approach for Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emission by Sources and Removals by Sinks from Afforestation and Reforestation under CDM [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(4): 31-36. |
[12] | Tong Xiaojuan;Zhang Jinsong;Meng Ping;Huang Hui;Guo Lin;Yin Changjun;Gao Jun. Characteristics of Net Carbon Exchange over a Mixed Plantation ina Hilly Area of the North China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(3): 37-43. |
[13] | Sun Long;Zhang Yao;Guo Qingxi;Hu Haiqing. Carbon Emission and Dynamic of NPP post Forest Fires in 1987 in Daxingan Mountains [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2009, 12(12): 100-104. |
[14] | Lu Fadian;Peter Lohmander. This research has been partly funded by Heureka at SUAS.Optimal Management Decisions for Mixed Forests under Risk [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2009, 12(11): 83-89. |
[15] | Ma Mingdong;Jiang Hong;Liu Yuejian. Biomass, Carbon Content, Carbon Storage and Their Vertical Distribution of Phoebe bourmei Artificial Stand [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2008, 44(3): 34-39. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||