Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2022, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (5): 121-130.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20220513
Previous Articles Next Articles
Ying Yao1,Jinfeng Cao2,Shitong Lu1,Wenbin Ding1,Yiwen Zhang1,Jianrong Wei1,Jianfeng Liu1,*
Received:
2021-01-23
Online:
2022-05-25
Published:
2022-08-19
Contact:
Jianfeng Liu
CLC Number:
Ying Yao,Jinfeng Cao,Shitong Lu,Wenbin Ding,Yiwen Zhang,Jianrong Wei,Jianfeng Liu. Isolation of Transcription Factor HRWRKY53 Gene from Hippophae rhamnoides and Analysis of Its Role in Resisting Rhagoletis batava obseuriosa[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(5): 121-130.
Table 1
The fluorescent quantitative primer for genes"
基因Gene | 上游引物Forward-primer (5’-3’) | 下游引物Reverse-primer (5’-3’) |
HrWRKY53 | GCAGAAAGAAAAATGCTTTTCAGG | CATTTCTCCAGCCTCCGAATCG |
HrJA2 | TGAGTTTATTCCCTTGTGAAGCTTC | TAGTCAATGGTGCAGTTTGAGA |
HrLOX1 | ACCTATTCTCACTGGTCACCCTG | TTTCTGAAGGCAAAAGCAGTG |
HrAOS | AACACAACATACGTGGGCTAATA | GTAAGTCACTGACAATCATCCG |
HrAOC | GAGGAGACACCTAAGAAAATCTC | CGCTGTTATATTGTCAGAGGACG |
HrUbi | TGCCTGAGGATGTATGCTAC | CCAAATAAGTCGCTGCCT |
Table 2
Transcriptome data analysis of key HrWRKYs differential genes in sea-buckthorn"
基因名称 Gene name | 抗系植株(危害前后) RI (Harm before/after) | 感系植株(危害前后) SI (Harm before/after) | 抗/感系植株(未危害) RI/SI (No harm) | 抗/感系植株(危害) RI/SI (Harm) | |||||||
表达 Regulate | 显著性 Significant | 表达 Regulate | 显著性 Significant | 表达 Regulate | 显著性 Significant | 表达 Regulate | 显著性 Significant | ||||
HrWRKY1 | U | NS | U | S | U | NS | D | NS | |||
HrWRKY17 | D | NS | U | NS | D | NS | D | S | |||
HrWRKY18 | U | NS | U | S | D | NS | D | S | |||
HrWRKY53 | U | S | U | NS | U | S | U | S | |||
HrWRKY33 | D | NS | U | NS | U | NS | D | NS | |||
HrWRKY40 | D | S | U | NS | D | NS | D | NS | |||
HrWRKY41 | U | NS | U | NS | D | NS | D | S | |||
HrWRKY71 | D | NS | D | S | U | S | D | S |
Fig.2
Homologous evolutionary analysis of HrWRKY53 transcription factor proteins A and B are sequence alignment of HrWRKY53 and WRKY proteins of other species and phylogenetic analysis of different WRKY proteins.The box indicates the WRKY domain, and the star indicates the zinc finger structure. Hippophae rhamnoides HrWRKY53, Glycine soja GsWRKY24, Glycine max GmWRKY49, Cajanus cajan CcWRKY24, Glycine max GmWRKY39, Vigna angularis VaWRKY25, Vigna radiata VrWRKY24, Vigna unguiculata VuWRKY24, Durio zibethinus DzWRKY24, Quercus lobata QiWRKY24, Fragaria vesca FvWRKY25, Herrania umbratica HuWRKY24, Theobroma cacao TcWRYK33, Jatropha curcas JcWRYK24, Rosa chinensis RcWRYK24, Gossypium hirsutum GhWRYK9, Jatropha curcas JcWRKY7, Hibiscus syriacus HsWRKY26, Nelumbo nucifera NnWRKY24, Tripterygium wilfordii TwWRKY26, Eucalyptus grandis EgWRKY26, Syzygium oleosum SoWRKY26, Lupinus angustifolius LaWRKY24, Cicer arietinum CaWRKY26."
Table 3
The expression levels of key genes in the JA synthesis pathway of seabuckthorn were analyzed based on transcriptome data under RBO"
基因名称 Gene name | 抗系植株(危害前后) RI (Harm before/after) | 感系植株(危害前后) SI (Harm before/after) | 抗/感系植株(未危害) RI/SI (No harm) | 抗/感系植株(危害) RI/SI (Harm) | |||||||
表达 Regulate | 显著性 Significant | 表达 Regulate | 显著性 Significant | 表达 Regulate | 显著性 Significant | 表达 Regulate | 显著性 Significant | ||||
HrJA2 | U | S | U | NS | U | NS | U | S | |||
HrSpr2 | U | S | D | NS | D | NS | U | S | |||
HrLOX1 | U | S | U | NS | U | NS | U | S | |||
HrLOX2 | D | NS | D | NS | D | NS | D | NS | |||
HrAOC | U | S | U | NS | U | NS | U | S | |||
HrAOS | U | S | D | NS | D | NS | U | S |
葛葆蔚, 李桂和, 张玉伟, 等. 沙棘果实蝇的初步研究. 辽宁林业科技, 1988, (3): 45- 46. 45-46, 61 | |
Ge B W , Li G H , Zhang Y W , et al. Preliminary study on fruit fly of Seabuckthorn. Liaoning Forestry Science and Technology, 1988, (3): 45- 46. 45-46, 61 | |
孔维龙, 于坤, 但乃震, 等. 甜菜WRKY转录因子全基因组鉴定及其在非生物胁迫下的表达分析. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50 (17): 3259- 3273. | |
Kong W L , Yu K , Dan N Z , et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of WRKY transcription factor under abiotic stress in Beta vulgaris. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50 (17): 3259- 3273. | |
汪兴鉴. 重要果蔬类有害实蝇概论(双翅目: 实蝇科). 植物检疫, 1995, 9 (1): 20- 30. | |
Wang X J . Introduction to harmful fruit and vegetable flies. Plant Quarantine, 1995, 9 (1): 20- 30. | |
文锋, 吴小祝, 廖亮, 等. WRKY转录因子在植物抗逆生理中的研究进展. 广西植物, 2017, 37 (1): 69- 79. 69-79, 68 | |
Wen F , Wu X Z , Liao L , et al. Research advances on physiological function of WRKY transcription factor in plant stress resistance. Guihaia, 2017, 37 (1): 69- 79. 69-79, 68 | |
魏建荣, 苏智, 刘明虎, 等. 沙棘果实的重要检疫害虫-沙棘绕实蝇的发生与危害. 内蒙古林业科技, 2012, 38 (4): 55- 57. | |
Wei J R , Su Z , Liu M H , et al. Occurrence and damage of Rhagoletis batava obseuriosa. Journal of Inner Mongolia Forestry Science & Technology, 2012, 38 (4): 55- 57. | |
徐伟, 付晓霞, 田径, 等. 诱导因子对苜蓿夜蛾和大豆食心虫嗅觉与产卵选择的影响. 吉林农业大学学报, 2010, 32 (5): 488- 491. 488-491, 497 | |
Xu W , Fu X X , Tian J , et al. Effects of different elicitors on olfactory responses and ovipositive selection of Heliothis viriplaca and Leguminivora glycinivorella. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2010, 32 (5): 488- 491. 488-491, 497 | |
徐惠娟, 郑蕊, 陈任, 等. 枸杞WRKY3基因克隆及组织表达分析. 西北植物学报, 2016, (36): 1721- 1727. | |
Xu H J , Zheng R , Chen R , et al. Cloning and tissue expression analysis of WRKY3 gene in Lycium barbarum L. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2016, (36): 1721- 1727. | |
Bari R , Jones J D G . Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses. Plant Molecular Biology, 2009, 69 (4): 473- 488.
doi: 10.1007/s11103-008-9435-0 |
|
Chen J N , Nolan T M , Ye H X , et al. Arabidopsis WRKY46, WRKY54, and WRKY70 transcription factors are involved in brassinosteroid-regulated plant growth and drought responses. The Plant Cell, 2017, 29 (6): 1425- 1439. | |
Erb M , Meldau S , Howe G A . Role of phytohormones in insect-specific plant reactions. Trends in Plant Science, 2012, 17 (5): 250- 259.
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.01.003 |
|
Eulgem T , Rushton P J , Schmelzer E , et al. Early nuclear events in plant defence signalling: rapid gene activation by WRKY transcription factors. The EMBO Journal, 1999, 18 (17): 4689- 4699.
doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.17.4689 |
|
Eulgem T , Somssich I E . Networks of WRKY transcription factors in defense signaling. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2007, 10 (4): 366- 371.
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.020 |
|
Hou Y X , Wang Y F , Tang L Q , et al. SAPK10-mediated phosphorylation on WRKY72 releases its suppression on Jasmonic acid biosynthesis and bacterial blight resistance. iScience, 2019, 16 (6): 499- 510. | |
Hu L F , Ye M , Li R , et al. The rice transcription factor WRKY53 suppresses herbivore-induced defenses by acting as a negative feedback modulator of mitogen-activated protein kinase activity. Plant Physiology, 2015, 169 (4): 2907- 2921. | |
Howe G A , Jander G . Plant immunity to insect herbivores. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2008, 59 (1): 41- 66.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092825 |
|
Li C L , Li D Q , Shao F J , et al. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of WRKY transcription factor genes in Salvia miltiorrhiza. BMC Genomics, 2015, 16 (1): 200.
doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1411-x |
|
Li J Y , Zhu L Z , Hull J J , et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals a comprehensive insect resistance response mechanism in cotton to infestation by the phloem feeding insect Bemisia tabaci (whitefly). Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2016, 14 (10): 1956- 1975.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.12554 |
|
Lu J , Li J C , Ju H P , et al. Contrasting effects of ethylene biosynthesis on induced plant resistance against a chewing and a piercing-sucking herbivore in rice. Molecular Plant, 2014, 7 (11): 1670- 1682.
doi: 10.1093/mp/ssu085 |
|
Maeo K , Hayashi S , Kojima-Suzuki H , et al. Role of conserved residues of the WRKY domain in the DNA-binding of tobacco WRKY family proteins. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 2001, 65 (11): 2428- 2436.
doi: 10.1271/bbb.65.2428 |
|
Pandey S P , Somssich I E . The role of WRKY transcription factors in plant immunity. Plant Physiology, 2009, 150 (4): 1648- 1655.
doi: 10.1104/pp.109.138990 |
|
Shamanskaya L D , Zubareva E N . Resistance estimation of seabuckthorn varieties to seabuckthorn fly (Rhagoletis batava obscuriosa Kol.). Research and Technical Advances of Agribusiness Sector, 2011, (3): 37- 40. | |
Stam J M , Kroes A , Li Y H , et al. Plant interactions with multiple insect herbivores: from community to genes. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2014, 65 (1): 689- 713.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-035937 |
|
Teng B S , Lu Y H , Wang Z T , et al. In vitro anti-tumor activity of isorhamnetin isolated from Hippophae rhamnoides L.against BEL-7402 cells. Pharmacological Research, 2006, 54 (3): 186- 194.
doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2006.04.007 |
|
Wu J Q , Baldwin I T . New insights into plant responses to the attack from insect herbivores. Annual Review of Genetics, 2010, 44 (1): 1- 24.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102209-163500 |
|
Wang Z Y , Feng R X , Zhang X , et al. Characterization of the Hippophae rhamnoides WRKY gene family and functional analysis of the role of the HrWRKY21 gene in resistance to abiotic stresses. Genome, 2019, 62 (10): 689- 703.
doi: 10.1139/gen-2019-0024 |
|
Yang Y , Zhou Y , Chi Y J , et al. Characterization of soybean WRKY gene family and identification of soybean WRKY genes that promote resistance to soybean Cyst Nematode. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7 (1): 17804.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18235-8 |
|
Zhang W W , Gao T W , Li P L , et al. Chrysanthemum CmWRKY53 negatively regulates the resistance of chrysanthemum to the aphid Macrosiphoniella sanborni. Horticulture Research, 2020, 7 (1): 109.
doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-0334-0 |
|
Zhang L Y , Gu L K , Ringler P , et al. Three WRKY transcription factors additively repress abscisic acid and gibberellin signaling in aleurone cells. Plant Science, 2015, 236, 214- 222.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.04.014 |
[1] | Lingbo Dong,Xueying Lin,Yifan Zhang,Zhaogang Liu. Optimal Rotation of Larix olgensis Plantation in Considering Carbon Sequestration and Timber Production [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(5): 18-30. |
[2] | Yan Wang,Jinling Feng,Xiaohui Wu,Lanming Huang,Juan Wu,Yu Chen,Zhijian Yang. Effects of Fertilization on Photosynthetic Carbon Fixation of Phoebe bournei Seedlings [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(5): 40-52. |
[3] | Zhang Lifang, Liang Shanqing, Jiang Peng, Zhang Longfei. Synergistic Mechanism Analysis of MgAl-LDHs/MP Compound Flame Retardant in Medium Density Fiberboard [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(5): 140-150. |
[4] | Lu Feng, Gu Guangtong, Cao Xianlei, Wu Weiguang. Risk of Forestry Carbon Sink Project Based on Coupling Effect [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(5): 161-176. |
[5] | Huiling Tian,Jianhua Zhu,Xiao He,Xinyun Chen,Zunji Jian,Chenyu Li,Xueyuan Guo,Guosheng Huang,Wenfa Xiao. Projected Biomass Carbon Stock of Arbor Forest of Three Provinces in Northeastern China Based on Random Forest Model [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(4): 40-50. |
[6] | Jing Yang,Yaoyi Zhang,Siyi Tan,Shu Liao,Dingyi Wang,Kai Yue,Xiangyin Ni,Fuzhong Wu,Yusheng Yang. Effects of Different Tree Species on the Compositions of Soil Aggregates and Their Carbon and Nitrogen Concentrations in Mid-Subtropical Forests [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(4): 51-61. |
[7] | Cong Li,Jinghua Lu,Mei Lu,Zhidong Yang,Pan Liu,Yulian Ren,Fan Du. Distribution of Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen across Different Altitudinal Vegetation Zones in Wenshan National Nature Reserve [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(3): 20-30. |
[8] | Youcai Gui,Songlin Zuo,Kainan Jin. Preparation of High-Surface-Area Carbon Foam by Self-Bubbling Method of Lignin [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(3): 139-148. |
[9] | Xiao Fu,Yuxing Zhang,Xuejun Wang. Prediction of Forest Biomass Carbon Pool and Carbon Sink Potential in China before 2060 [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(2): 32-41. |
[10] | Zhikang Hou,Songwei Zeng,Lufeng Mo,Yufeng Zhou. CO2 Concentration in Phyllostachys praecox Stand Inversion Based on GA-BP Neural Network [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(2): 42-48. |
[11] | Sha Zhou,Huanfei Ma,Jieying Wang,Chengjie Ren,Yaoxin Guo,Jun Wang,Fazhu Zhao. Latitudinal Distribution of Forest Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Its Affecting Factors in China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(2): 49-57. |
[12] | Panpan Wu,Lijian Zeng,Ping Lei,Dandan Hu,Jinlong Li,Mantang Wang,Quanlin Zhong. Content of Leaf Nutrients and Resorption Efficiency of Major Tree Species in Tsuga chinensis Forest in Wuyi Mountain, Jiangxi Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(1): 12-21. |
[13] | Hanwen Zhu,Guanben Du,Zhong Yang,Bin Lü,Shenggao Lu. Determination of Resin Content of Eucalyptus Wood Fiber by Near Infrared Spectroscopy [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(8): 141-146. |
[14] | Aiqin Zhu,Lei Gu,Weiqiang Zhu,Yiyong Feng,Wei Chen,Guomo Zhou. Impact of Exogenous Incentives and Value Recognition on Farmers' Willingness of Continuous Participation in Forest Carbon Sequestration Project [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(8): 176-188. |
[15] | Yao Seedlings,Yanyou Wu. Effects of Fluoride and Bicarbonate on Growth and Carbon Metabolism of Broussonetia papyrifera Seedlings [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(6): 56-63. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||