林业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (5): 41-52.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20220393
崔朝伟1,2,3,彭丽鸿1,2,马东旭1,2,王佳琪1,2,江祥庆4,江先桂4,马祥庆1,2,林开敏1,2,*
收稿日期:
2022-06-11
出版日期:
2023-05-25
发布日期:
2023-08-02
通讯作者:
林开敏
基金资助:
Chaowei Cui1,2,3,Lihong Peng1,2,Dongxu Ma1,2,Jiaqi Wang1,2,Xiangqing Jiang4,Xiangui Jiang4,Xiangqing Ma1,2,Kaimin Lin1,2,*
Received:
2022-06-11
Online:
2023-05-25
Published:
2023-08-02
Contact:
Kaimin Lin
摘要:
目的: 分析不同间伐强度下杉木人工林土壤理化性质、酶活性、微生物残体碳及其对土壤有机碳(SOC)贡献的差异,揭示土壤理化性质和酶活性对微生物残体碳积累的调控机制,为杉木人工林可持续经营、缓解全球气候变化和实现我国碳中和目标提供科学依据。方法: 以福建省沙县官庄国有林场杉木人工林为研究对象,采集不同间伐强度(31%、45%、63%)样地0~10、10~20 cm土层样品,以氨基糖为微生物残体的组分标志物,探讨间伐强度和土层深度对土壤微生物残体积累特征的影响。结果: 1) 土壤细菌残体碳(MRCB)、真菌残体碳(MRCF)、微生物总残体碳(MRC)含量均随间伐强度增加显著升高(P<0.05),真菌与细菌残体碳比(MRCF/MRCB)随间伐强度增加而降低;土壤MRCB、MRCF、MRC、MRCF/MRCB均随土层深度增加而降低;2) 土壤MRCB、MRCF、MRC对SOC的贡献率在不同间伐强度下分别为13.20%~18.99%、28.42%~39.72%、41.62%~58.70%,且随土层深度增加呈升高趋势;3) 在0~10、10~20 cm土层,SOC、全磷(TP)、有效磷(AP)、微生物生物量碳(MBC)、可溶性碳(DOC)、硝态氮(NO3?-N)、铵态氮(NH4+-N)含量均为强度间伐>中度间伐>弱度间伐,pH、密度随间伐强度增加而降低;4) 间伐强度和土层深度对土壤酶活性具有显著或极显著影响(P<0.05),随间伐强度增加,土壤酸性磷酸酶(SACP)、过氧化物酶(SPOD)和β-葡萄糖苷酶(β)含量均呈上升趋势,多酚氧化酶(SPPO)含量先降后升;且随土层深度增加,4种酶活性均呈下降趋势;5) 结构方程模型(SEM)分析表明,土壤化学性质和酶活性分别是对0~10、10~20 cm土层土壤微生物残体碳含量影响较大的潜变量,对潜变量土壤微生物残体碳含量影响较大的土壤单因子在0~10 cm土层为可溶性碳(P=0.002)和铵态氮(P=0.066)含量,在10~20 cm土层为过氧化物酶(P=0.002)和硝态氮(P=0.034)含量。结论: 随间伐强度增加,杉木人工林土壤理化性质和酶活性变化明显,土壤各形态碳和微生物残体碳含量不断提高;结构方程模型拟合程度良好,土壤微生物残体碳含量主要受土壤化学性质(可溶性碳、铵态氮和硝态氮)和酶活性(过氧化物酶)潜变量调控,在杉木人工林经营中,可通过适度管理密度提高土壤养分含量和酶活性,并提升微生物残体碳含量及对SOC库的贡献。
中图分类号:
崔朝伟,彭丽鸿,马东旭,王佳琪,江祥庆,江先桂,马祥庆,林开敏. 间伐对杉木人工林土壤微生物残体碳的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(5): 41-52.
Chaowei Cui,Lihong Peng,Dongxu Ma,Jiaqi Wang,Xiangqing Jiang,Xiangui Jiang,Xiangqing Ma,Kaimin Lin. Effects of Thinning on Soil Microbial Necromass Carbon in
表1
林分样地概况①"
项目 Item | 弱度间伐 Weak thinning(WT) | 中度间伐 Moderate thinning(MT) | 强度间伐 Heavy thinning(HT) |
经纬度 Latitude and longitude | 117°43′15.56″—117°43′18.37″E,26°32′61.80″—26°32′67.48″N | ||
坡向 Aspect | 阳坡 Sunny slope | ||
坡度 Average slope/(°) | 25 | 27 | 20 |
优势灌木(重要值) Dominant bushes (important value) | 杜茎山Maesa japonica (37.68%)、紫麻Oreocnide frutescens (23.05%) | 杜茎山Maesa japonica (26.77%)、粗叶榕Ficus hirta (21.06%) | 杜茎山Maesa japonica (22.93%)、紫珠Callicarpa bodinieri (15.54%) |
优势草本(重要值) Dominant herbs (important value) | 傅氏凤尾蕨Pteris fauriei(37.01%)、华南毛蕨Cyclosorus parasiticus (12.81%)、中华薹草Carex chinensis (11.20%) | 傅氏凤尾蕨Pteris fauriei (34.19%)、枸骨Ilex cornuta (10.20%)、华南毛蕨Cyclosorus parasiticus (11.62%)、中华薹草Carex chinensis (11.20%) | 傅氏凤尾蕨Pteris fauriei (26.93%)、华南毛蕨Cyclosorus parasiticus (10.57%) |
初植密度 Initial density/(tree·hm?2) | 3 250 | ||
间伐强度 Thinning intensity(%) | 31 | 45 | 63 |
保留密度 Reserving density/(tree·hm?2) | 2 250 | 1 800 | 1 200 |
伐前胸径 DBH before thinning/cm | 11.83±0.29B | 11.44±0.17AB | 10.98±0.33A |
伐后胸径 DBH after thinning/cm | 13.09±0.47B | 13.47±0.47AB | 13.84±0.73A |
伐前树高 Tree height before thinning /m | 11.32±0.14A | 11.34±0.28A | 11.06±0.17A |
伐后树高 Tree height after thinning /m | 11.89±0.18B | 12.04±0.09AB | 12.20±0.36A |
土壤类型 Soil type | 黄红壤 Yellow-red soil | ||
母质 Parent material | 岩浆岩、沉积岩Magmatic, sedimentary |
表2
不同间伐强度下杉木人工林土壤理化性质①"
土壤指标 Soil index | 0~10 cm | 10~20 cm | Two-way ANOVA | ||||||||
WT | MT | HT | WT | MT | HT | T | D | T×D | |||
SD/(g·cm?3) | 1.20±0.11Aa | 1.09±0.27Aa | 1.01±0.20Aa | 1.23±0.11Aa | 1.15±0.21Aa | 1.08±0.26Aa | ns | ns | ns | ||
SMC(%) | 31.60±2.10Ba | 30.73±1.96Ba | 33.95±2.35Aa | 30.99±2.48ABa | 29.84±2.41Ba | 32.99±2.74Aa | * | ns | ns | ||
pH | 4.42±0.08Aa | 4.33±0.07ABa | 4.29±0.12Ba | 4.61±0.35Aa | 4.22±0.06Bb | 4.32±0.1Ba | ** | ns | * | ||
SOC/(g·kg?1) | 16.47±3.04Aa | 18.04±2.14Aa | 19.14±3.59Aa | 11.45±2.20Ba | 11.25±1.03Bb | 15.17±3.59Aa | * | ** | ns | ||
TN/(g·kg?1) | 1.58±0.08Aa | 1.55±0.13Aa | 1.81±0.06Aa | 1.37±0.04Ab | 1.01±0.07Bb | 1.38±0.05Ab | ** | * | ns | ||
TP/(g·kg?1) | 0.48±0.05Ba | 0.56±0.03Ba | 0.95±0.13Aa | 0.48±0.06Ba | 0.51±0.01Bb | 0.81±0.14Aa | ** | * | ns | ||
AP/(mg·kg?1) | 2.98±0.08Bb | 3.08±0.10Bb | 3.30±0.16Aa | 2.96±0.11Bb | 2.92±0.07Bb | 3.14±0.16Aa | ** | ** | ns | ||
NO3?-N/(mg·kg?1) | 2.86±0.06Ca | 3.58±0.14Bb | 4.61±0.12Aa | 3.03±0.14Ba | 4.36±0.01Aa | 4.50±0.11Aa | ** | * | * | ||
NH4+-N/(mg·kg?1) | 11.37±0.29Ca | 14.46±0.46Bb | 17.40±0.64Ab | 11.38±0.36Ca | 17.79±0.74Ba | 20.04±1.01Aa | ** | * | * | ||
MBC/(mg·kg?1) | 277.67±30.94Cb | 456.56±44.32Ba | 565.99±33.18Aa | 332.62±40.84Ba | 414.88±46.9Aa | 426.97±59.6Ab | ** | ** | ** | ||
DOC/(mg·kg?1) | 467.32±43.72Ca | 578.66±48.36Ba | 772.78±51.91Aa | 504.26±37.9Ca | 557.93±67.34Ba | 686.53±46.12Ab | ** | ns | ** |
邓先智, 类延宝, 沈 杰, 等. 模拟根系分泌物输入对高寒退化草地土壤微生物残体的影响. 生态学报, 2022, 42 (20): 8311- 8321. | |
Deng X Z, Lei Y B, Shen J, et al. Effects of simulated root exudates input on soil microbial residues in the degraded alpine grassland. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42 (20): 8311- 8321. | |
丁 波, 丁贵杰, 赵熙州, 等. 间伐对杉木人工林土壤酶活性及微生物的影响. 林业科学研究, 2017, 30 (6): 1059- 1065. | |
Ding B, Ding G J, Zhao X Z, et al. Impacts of thinning on soil enzymes activity and microorganisms in Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation . Forest Research, 2017, 30 (6): 1059- 1065. | |
丁雪丽, 何红波, 白 震, 等. 不同供氮水平对施用玉米秸秆后黑土氨基糖转化的影响. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20 (9): 2207- 2213. | |
Ding X L, He H B, Bai Z, et al. Effects of nitrogen supply level on microbial transformation of amino sugar in a mollisol amended with maize straw. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009, 20 (9): 2207- 2213. | |
郝俊鹏, 凌 宁, 李瑞霞, 等. 间伐对马尾松人工林土壤酶活性的影响. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 37 (4): 51- 56. | |
Hao J P, Ling N, Li R X, et al. Effects of thinning on the soil enzyme activity in the Pinus massoniana Lamb . plantation. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2013, 37 (4): 51- 56. | |
梁 超, 朱雪峰. 土壤微生物碳泵储碳机制概论. 中国科学(地球科学), 2021, 51 (5): 680- 695.
doi: 10.1360/SSTe-2020-0213 |
|
Liang C, Zhu X F. The soil microbial carbon pump as a new concept for terrestrial carbon sequestration. Scientia Sinica (Terrae), 2021, 51 (5): 680- 695.
doi: 10.1360/SSTe-2020-0213 |
|
李庭宇, 李双异, 刘 旭, 等. 土壤微生物标识物——氨基糖的研究进展. 土壤通报, 2022, 53 (1): 241- 252.
doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021032302 |
|
Li T Y, Li S Y, Liu X, et al. Soil biomarkers: research progress of amino sugars. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 53 (1): 241- 252.
doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021032302 |
|
滕泽栋, 李 敏, 朱 静, 等. 解磷微生物对土壤磷资源利用影响的研究进展. 土壤通报, 2017, 48 (1): 229- 235. | |
Teng Z D, Li M, Zhu J, et al. Research advances in effect of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms on soil phosphorus resource utilization. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2017, 48 (1): 229- 235. | |
徐雪蕾, 孙玉军, 周 华, 等. 间伐强度对杉木人工林林下植被和土壤性质的影响. 林业科学, 2019, 55 (3): 1- 12. | |
Xu X L, Sun Y J, Zhou H, et al. Effects of thinning intensity on understory growth and soil properties in Chinese fir plantation. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55 (3): 1- 12. | |
于立忠, 张景普, 刘利芳, 等. 间伐对不同肥力日本落叶松人工林土壤酶活性的影响. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36 (11): 3017- 3027. | |
Yu L Z, Zhang J P, Liu L F, et al. The effects of thinning on soil enzyme activities in Larix kaempferi plantations with different site conditions . Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36 (11): 3017- 3027. | |
于颖超, 张心昱, 戴晓琴, 等. 亚热带红壤区森林土壤剖面微生物残体碳分布及影响因素. 生态学报, 2022, 42 (3): 1108- 1117. | |
Yu Y C, Zhang X Y, Dai X Q, et al. Distributions and influencing factors of microbial residue carbon contents in forest soil profile in subtropical red soil region. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42 (3): 1108- 1117. | |
Amelung W, Brodowski S, Sandhage-Hofmann A, et al. 2008. Chapter 6 combining biomarker with stable isotope analyses for assessing the transformation and turnover of soil organic matter. Advances in Agronomy, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 155-250. | |
Chen J, Luo Y Q, Li J W, et al. Costimulation of soil glycosidase activity and soil respiration by nitrogen addition. Global Change Biology, 2017, 23 (3): 1328- 1337.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.13402 |
|
Cotrufo M F, Ranalli M G, Haddix M L, et al. Soil carbon storage informed by particulate and mineral-associated organic matter. Nature Geoscience, 2019, 12 (12): 989- 994.
doi: 10.1038/s41561-019-0484-6 |
|
Dang P, Gao Y, Liu J, et al. Effects of thinning intensity on understory vegetation and soil microbial communities of a mature Chinese pine plantation in the Loess Plateau. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 630, 171- 180.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.197 |
|
Ding X L, Han X Z, Zhang X D, et al. Effects of contrasting agricultural management on microbial residues in a Mollisol in China. Soil and Tillage Research, 2013, 130, 13- 17.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2013.02.001 |
|
Fan X L, Gao D C, Zhao C H, et al. Improved model simulation of soil carbon cycling by representing the microbially derived organic carbon pool. The ISME Journal, 2021, 15 (8): 2248- 2263.
doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-00914-0 |
|
Fan Y X, Yang L M, Zhong X J, et al. N addition increased microbial residual carbon by altering soil P availability and microbial composition in a subtropical Castanopsis forest . Geoderma, 2020, 375, 114470.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114470 |
|
Fernandez C W, Langley J A, Chapman S, et al. The decomposition of ectomycorrhizal fungal necromass. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2016, 93, 38- 49.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.10.017 |
|
Grover M, Maheswari M, Desai S, et al. Elevated CO2: plant associated microorganisms and carbon sequestration . Applied Soil Ecology, 2015, 95, 73- 85.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.05.006 |
|
Hall S J, Huang W J, Timokhin V I, et al. 2020. Lignin lags, leads, or limits the decomposition of litter and soil organic carbon. Ecology,doi: 10.1002/ECY.3113. | |
He H B, Zhang, Zhang X D, et al. Temporal responses of soil microorganisms to substrate addition as indicated by amino sugar differentiation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2011, 43 (6): 1155- 1161.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.02.002 |
|
Hogberg P, Read D J. Towards a more plant physiological perspective on soil ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2006, 21 (10): 548- 554. | |
Hu L N, Li Q, Yan J H, et al. Vegetation restoration facilitates belowground microbial network complexity and recalcitrant soil organic carbon storage in southwest China Karst region. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 820, 153137.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153137 |
|
Hu Y T, Zheng Q, Noll L, et al. Direct measurement of the in situ decomposition of microbial-derived soil organic matter . Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2019, 141, 107660. | |
Indorf C, Dyckmans J, Khan K S, et al. Optimisation of amino sugar quantification by HPLC in soil and plant hydrolysates. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2011, 47 (4): 387- 396.
doi: 10.1007/s00374-011-0545-5 |
|
Iyyemperumal K, Green J, Israel D W, et al. Soil chemical and microbiological properties in hay production systems: residual effects of contrasting N fertilization of swine lagoon effluent versus ammonium nitrate. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2008, 44 (3): 425- 434.
doi: 10.1007/s00374-007-0221-y |
|
Joergensen R G. Amino sugars as specific indices for fungal and bacterial residues in soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2018, 54 (5): 559- 568.
doi: 10.1007/s00374-018-1288-3 |
|
Kalbitz K, Schmerwitz J, Schwesig D, et al. Biodegradation of soil-derived dissolved organic matter as related to its properties. Geoderma, 2003, 113 (3/4): 273- 291. | |
Kallenbach C M, Grandy A S, Frey S D, et al. Microbial physiology and necromass regulate agricultural soil carbon accumulation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2015, 91, 279- 290.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.09.005 |
|
Kögel-Knabner I, Guggenberger G, Kleber M, et al. Organo-mineral associations in temperate soils: integrating biology, mineralogy, and organic matter chemistry. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2008, 171 (1): 61- 82.
doi: 10.1002/jpln.200700048 |
|
Lavallee J M, Soong J L, Cotrufo M F. Conceptualizing soil organic matter into particulate and mineral-associated forms to address global change in the 21st century. Global Change Biology, 2020, 26 (1): 261- 273.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.14859 |
|
Lehmann J, Kinyangi J, Solomon D. Organic matter stabilization in soil microaggregates: implications from spatial heterogeneity of organic carbon contents and carbon forms. Biogeochemistry, 2007, 85 (1): 45- 57.
doi: 10.1007/s10533-007-9105-3 |
|
Lehmann J, Kleber M. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature, 2015, 528 (7580): 60- 68.
doi: 10.1038/nature16069 |
|
Liang C, Amelung W, Lehmann J, et al. Quantitative assessment of microbial necromass contribution to soil organic matter. Global Change Biology, 2019, 25 (11): 3578- 3590.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.14781 |
|
Liang C, Balser T C. Microbial production of recalcitrant organic matter in global soils: implications for productivity and climate policy. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2011, 9 (1): 75. | |
Liang C, Duncan D S, Balser T C, et al. Soil microbial residue storage linked to soil legacy under biofuel cropping systems in southern Wisconsin, USA. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2013, 57, 939- 942.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.09.006 |
|
Liang C, Schimel J P, Jastrow J D. The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage. Nature Microbiology, 2017, 2, 17105.
doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.105 |
|
Ma T, Zhu S S, Wang Z H, et al. Divergent accumulation of microbial necromass and plant lignin components in grassland soils. Nature Communications, 2018, 9, 3480.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05891-1 |
|
Mou Z J, Kuang L, He L, et al. Climatic and edaphic controls over the elevational pattern of microbial necromass in subtropical forests. CATENA, 2021, 207, 105707.
doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105707 |
|
Ni X Y, Liao S, Tan S Y, et al. The vertical distribution and control of microbial necromass carbon in forest soils. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2020, 29 (10): 1829- 1839.
doi: 10.1111/geb.13159 |
|
Nottingham A T, Whitaker J, Turner B L, et al. Climate warming and soil carbon in tropical forests: insights from an elevation gradient in the Peruvian Andes . BioScience, 2015, 65 (9): 906- 921.
doi: 10.1093/biosci/biv109 |
|
Prommer J, Walker T W N, Wanek W, et al. Increased microbial growth, biomass, and turnover drive soil organic carbon accumulation at higher plant diversity. Global Change Biology, 2020, 26 (2): 669- 681.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.14777 |
|
Schmidt J, Fester T, Schulz E, et al. Effects of plant-symbiotic relationships on the living soil microbial community and microbial necromass in a long-term agro-ecosystem. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 581/582, 756- 765.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.005 |
|
Schmidt M W I, Torn M S, Abiven S, et al. Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature, 2011, 478 (7367): 49- 56.
doi: 10.1038/nature10386 |
|
Shao P S, Liang C, Lynch L, et al. Reforestation accelerates soil organic carbon accumulation: evidence from microbial biomarkers. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2019, 131, 182- 190.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.01.012 |
|
Shao S, Zhao Y, Zhang W, et al. Linkage of microbial residue dynamics with soil organic carbon accumulation during subtropical forest succession. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2017, 114, 114- 120.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.07.007 |
|
Spohn M, Klaus K, Wanek W, et al. Microbial carbon use efficiency and biomass turnover times depending on soil depth - Implications for carbon cycling. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2016, 96, 74- 81.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.01.016 |
|
Sradnick A, Oltmanns M, Raupp J, et al. Microbial residue indices down the soil profile after long-term addition of farmyard manure and mineral fertilizer to a sandy soil. Geoderma, 2014, 226/227, 79- 84.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.03.005 |
|
Teste F P, Lieffers V J, Strelkov S E. Ectomycorrhizal community responses to intensive forest management: thinning alters impacts of fertilization. Plant and Soil, 2012, 360 (1): 333- 347. | |
Wang B R, Liang C, Yao H J, et al. The accumulation of microbial necromass carbon from litter to mineral soil and its contribution to soil organic carbon sequestration. CATENA, 2021, 207, 105622.
doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105622 |
|
Wang S L, Zhang W D, Sanchez F. Relating net primary productivity to soil organic matter decomposition rates in pure and mixed Chinese fir plantations. Plant and Soil, 2010, 334 (1): 501- 510. | |
Zhang W, Cui Y H, Lu X K, et al. High nitrogen deposition decreases the contribution of fungal residues to soil carbon pools in a tropical forest ecosystem. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2016, 97, 211- 214.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.03.019 |
|
Zhang X D, Amelung W. Gas chromatographic determination of muramic acid, glucosamine, mannosamine, and galactosamine in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1996, 28 (9): 1201- 1206.
doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(96)00117-4 |
|
Zhou J, Wen Y, Shi L, et al. Strong priming of soil organic matter induced by frequent input of labile carbon. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021, 152, 108069.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.108069 |
|
Zhou L L, Cai L P, He Z M, et al. Thinning increases understory diversity and biomass, and improves soil properties without decreasing growth of Chinese fir in Southern China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 23 (23): 24135- 24150.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7624-y |
|
Zhu Y G, Miller R M. Carbon cycling by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil-plant systems. Trends in Plant Science, 2003, 8 (9): 407- 409.
doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(03)00184-5 |
[1] | 王宏星,孙晓梅,陈东升,吴春燕,张守攻. 适度间伐对日本落叶松人工林生物多样性和土壤多功能性影响[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(6): 1-11. |
[2] | 贾若峰,谷奇,孙一鸣,陆鹏飞,俱世博,乔海莉. 取食洋白蜡和旱柳光肩星天牛幼虫肠道中的细菌多样性差异及关键纤维素降解细菌筛选[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(4): 117-131. |
[3] | 程鑫,吴纯泽,韦庆钰,李伟,卫星. 水曲柳丛枝菌根真菌接菌苗对干旱胁迫的生长和生理响应[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(2): 58-66. |
[4] | 赵文菲,曹小玉,谢政锠,庞一凡,孙亚萍,李际平,莫永俊,袁达. 基于结构方程模型的杉木公益林林分空间结构评价[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(8): 76-88. |
[5] | 李志,薛晓焱,刘震,蔡齐飞,耿晓东,冯建,周慧娜,张涛,李明婉,王艳梅. 山桐子健康和感病植株不同器官区细菌群落结构、多样性与功能预测分析[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(8): 136-148. |
[6] | 唐汉尧,郑吉阳,王敦. 摩泽蒲螨携带杀虫真菌靶向防治光肩星天牛[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(8): 157-164. |
[7] | 谭明涛,姜礅,武帅,张杰,刘磊,赵佳齐,孟昭军,严善春. 美国白蛾对摩西球囊霉定殖银中杨的适应和生理响应[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(6): 88-94. |
[8] | 郝龙飞,刘婷岩,何永琴,张盛晰,赵媛. 菌根真菌调控灌木铁线莲根际土壤生态化学计量特征对氮沉降的应激响应[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(6): 151-160. |
[9] | 韩丽娜,谢贤安,陈辉,唐明. 巨桉金属耐受蛋白EgMTP6的分子特征及功能[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(5): 93-101. |
[10] | 李斌,史鸿翔,刘兰兰,杨璞,张欣,陈航,冯颖,陈晓鸣. 女贞叶、茎、根及根际土壤真菌群落结构及功能群特征[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(5): 102-112. |
[11] | 王立祥,崔树鹏,孔露露,王萱,杨宗基,任利利,骆有庆. 内生真菌对新渡户树蜂共生真菌的抑制作用[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(5): 113-120. |
[12] | 刘晨,张春雨,赵秀海. 采伐干扰对吉林蛟河针阔混交林生产力稳定性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(3): 1-9. |
[13] | 李梓杨,陈晓琳,李丽丽,许诗萍,何苑皞. 油茶根系与内生细菌枯草芽孢杆菌互作早期的转录组分析[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(3): 48-58. |
[14] | 丛微,于晶晶,喻海茫,丁易,张于光. 不同气候带森林土壤微生物多样性和群落构建特征[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(2): 70-79. |
[15] | 张梦娇,史帅营,刘政安,朱学玲,范昆,史国安. 间伐对'凤丹’牡丹生长、籽粒产量及品质的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(1): 162-174. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||