林业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (4): 99-108.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20200411
何经纬1,张伊莹1,田呈明1,熊典广1,梁英梅2
收稿日期:
2019-01-13
出版日期:
2020-04-25
发布日期:
2020-05-29
基金资助:
Jingwei He1,Yiying Zhang1,Chengming Tian1,Dianguang Xiong1,Yingmei Liang2
Received:
2019-01-13
Online:
2020-04-25
Published:
2020-05-29
摘要:
目的: 开展不同尺度景观格局下银白杨锈病危害调查,探讨景观格局对病害发生、流行以及扩散的影响,为病害防治提供理论参考。方法: 在北京延庆地区选取78个样点调查杨树锈病,计算病情指数,并基于研究区遥感影像分类图设置以样点为中心,半径分别为250、500、750、1 000m的缓冲区,运用Fragstats软件计算各尺度缓冲区内景观水平和类型水平的景观指数。采用R软件进行病情指数的统计分析以及各尺度下景观指数的相关性分析、病情指数与景观指数的逐步回归分析,通过生态学统计分析软件Canoco进行类型水平景观指数的RDA分析。结果: 杨树锈病在研究区内广泛发生,病情指数在5.6~94.1之间,其危害程度受景观格局特征、生境环境和人工管理状况的影响。在景观水平上,不同尺度缓冲区内景观格局对杨树锈病危害程度具有不同响应,影响显著的因子也有所差异。在类型水平上,耕地及草地斑块对杨树锈病发生具有显著影响,主要表现在斑块密度(PD)、散布与并列指数(IJI)等共性指标。结论: 景观结构中行道路廊道和草地、耕地基底为病害传播提供便利条件,可促进杨树锈病发生;在本研究选取的尺度中,500 m缓冲区是该病害管理的最佳尺度,在此尺度下,景观指数与病情指数的拟合度最佳;结合杨树锈病发生的病理学特点,可通过面积-形状指标、景观聚集度指标及多样性指标解释病害的发生情况,景观内部斑块形状较高的复杂性和多样性会抑制病害发生,景观单元内斑块类型越分散、景观结构越细化且细化的斑块之间分布越均匀,则病害流行越严重。
中图分类号:
何经纬,张伊莹,田呈明,熊典广,梁英梅. 区域景观格局对杨树锈病为害流行的影响——以北京延庆地区银白杨为例[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(4): 99-108.
Jingwei He,Yiying Zhang,Chengming Tian,Dianguang Xiong,Yingmei Liang. Effects of Regional Landscape Pattern on the Epidemic of Poplar Rust Disease: A Case Study of Populus alba in Yanqing, Beijing[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(4): 99-108.
表1
杨树锈病分级标准"
病级 Diseas grade | 发病程度 Disease severity | 代表值 Value |
Ⅰ | 叶部无症状No uredinia | 0 |
Ⅱ | 叶背部夏孢子堆很少,呈零星分布Very little urediniascattered | 1 |
Ⅲ | 夏孢子堆小而稀,少数连片,占叶面积1/4~1/2 A few uredinia, yellow, cover an area of 1/4 to 1/2 | 2 |
Ⅳ | 夏孢子堆大,叶背多呈片状分布,占面积1/2~3/4 Some uredinia pieces, cover an area of 1/2 to 3/4 | 3 |
Ⅴ | 夏孢子堆大,布满整个叶背,叶脉处常较密,可见黄色粉状物 Uredinia covers the entire back of the leaf, yellow powder can be seen | 4 |
表2
本研究选取的景观格局指数①"
类型 Category | 指数 Metric | 景观水平 Landscape | 类型水平 Class | 选取指数 Selected metric |
面积-形状 Area-shape | 景观面积Total area | √ | √ | TA |
最大斑块指数Largest patch index | √ | √ | LPI | |
斑块类型面积比Percentage of landscape | √ | PLAND | ||
斑块面积Patch area | √ | √ | AREA_MN、AREA_SD | |
回旋半径Radius of gyration | √ | √ | GYRATE_MN、GYRATE_SD | |
周长面积分维度Perimeter-area fractal dimension | √ | √ | PAFRAC | |
周长面积比率Perimeter-area ratio | √ | √ | PARA_MN、PARA_SD | |
形状指标Shape index | √ | √ | SHAPE_MN、SHAPE_SD | |
分维度指标Fractal dimension index | √ | √ | FRAC_MN、FRAC_SD | |
相关外接圆Related circumscribing circle | √ | √ | CIRCLE_MN、CIRCLE_SD | |
邻近指数Contiguity index | √ | √ | CONTIG_MN、CONTIG_SD | |
聚集度 Aggregation | 斑块数量Number of patches | √ | √ | NP |
斑块密度Patch density | √ | √ | PD | |
景观分离度Landscape division index | √ | √ | DIVISION | |
分散指数Splitting index | √ | √ | SPLIT | |
有效网格大小Effective mesh size | √ | √ | MESH | |
蔓延度Contagion | √ | CONTAG | ||
散布与并列指数Interspersion juxtaposition index | √ | √ | IJI | |
相似邻接比例Proportion of like adjacencies | √ | √ | PLADJ | |
聚合度Aggregation index | √ | √ | AI | |
斑块内聚力指数Patch cohesion index | √ | √ | COHESION | |
景观形状指数Landscape shape index(LSI) | √ | √ | LSI | |
标准化景观形状指数Normalized LSI | √ | NLSI | ||
丛聚指数Clumpiness | √ | CLUMPY | ||
几何最近距离Euclidean nearest neighbor distance | √ | √ | ENN_MN、ENN_SD | |
多样性 Diversity | 斑块丰富度Patch richness | √ | PR | |
斑块丰富度密度Patch richness density | √ | PRD | ||
香侬多样性指数Shannon’s diversity index | √ | SHDI | ||
辛普森多样性指数Simpson’s diversity index | √ | SIDI | ||
修正辛普森多样性指数Modified simpson’s diversity index | √ | MSIDI | ||
总计Total | 35 | 32 |
表3
不同尺度下选择的景观指数"
尺度 Scale | 选取指数 Metrics selected |
250 m | NP, AREA_SD, SHAPE_MN, SHAPE_SD, FRAC_MN, PARA_SD, CONTIG_MN, CONTIG_SD, ENN_MN, ENN_SD, COHESION, MESH, IJI, SHDI |
500 m | LPI, AREA_MN, GYRATE_MN, FRAC_MN, FRAC_SD, PARA_MN, CIRCLE_SD, CONTIG_SD, PAFRAC, ENN_MN, ENN_SD, PLADJ, IJI, COHESION, DIVISION, PD, PRD, SHDI |
750 m | LPI, AREA_MN, GYRATE_SD, SHAPE_MN, FRAC_MN, PARA_MN, CIRCLE_MN, CONTIG_MN, PAFRAC, PLADJ, IJI, COHESION, PRD, SHDI |
1 000 m | NP, SHAPE_MN, PARA_MN, CONTIG_MN, PAFRAC, CONTAG, COHESION, SPLIT, SIDI |
表4
景观水平逐步回归结果及模型拟合度①"
250 m | 500 m | 750 m | 1 000 m | |||||||
指数 Metrics | 回归系数 Estimate | 指数 Metrics | 回归系数 Estimate | 指数 Metrics | 回归系数 Estimate | 指数 Metrics | 回归系数 Estimate | |||
NP | 5.71* | LPI | 1.86* | AREA_MN | -3.09** | PARA_MN | -25.67** | |||
SHAPE_MN | -26.21** | PD | -3.66** | SHAPE_MN | 22.31* | CONTIG_SD | 156.31** | |||
SHAPE_SD | 8.22* | FRAC_SD | 167.23** | PARA_MN | -54.62* | CONTAG | 3.22* | |||
FRAC_MN | 214.08** | PARA_MN | -34.71* | CONTIG_MN | -96.16** | COHESION | 82.59** | |||
CONTIG_MN | -64.87** | PAFRAC | -40.85** | PAFRAC | -84.33** | SPLIT | 12.73** | |||
ENN_MN | 4.94* | PLADJ | -6.28* | COHESION | 22.49** | SIDI | -0.42* | |||
MESH | -8.64** | IJI | 7.34** | SHDI | -0.75* | |||||
DIVISION | 6.55* | |||||||||
SHDI | -0.17** | |||||||||
R2=0.42 P=0.02 | R2=0.60 P < 0.01 | R2=0.45 P=0.03 | R2=0.29 P=0.01 |
柏龙, 田呈明, 洪承昊, 等. 湖北宜昌松林景观格局对松材线虫流行及扩散的影响. 生态学报, 2015. 35 (24): 8107- 8116. | |
Bai L , Tian C M , Hong C H , et al. The relationship between pine forest landscape patterns and pine wilt disease in Yichang, Hubei Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015. 35 (24): 8107- 8116. | |
布仁仓, 胡远满, 常禹, 等. 景观指数之间的相关分析. 生态学报, 2005. 25 (10): 2764- 2775.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.10.044 |
|
Bu R C , Hu Y M , Chang Y , et al. A correlation analysis on landscape metrics. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005. 25 (10): 2764- 2775.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.10.044 |
|
陈利顶, 李秀珍, 傅伯杰, 等. 中国景观生态学发展历程与未来研究重点. 生态学报, 2014. 34 (12): 3129- 3141. | |
Chen L D , Li X Z , Fu B J , et al. Development history and future research priorities of landscape ecology in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014. 34 (12): 3129- 3141. | |
戴玉成, 沈周. 杨树栅锈菌Melampsora spp. 的数量分类研究.林业科学, 1989. 25 (1): 86- 92. | |
Dai Y C , Shen Z . Quantitative classification study of Melampsora spp. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1989. 25 (1): 86- 92. | |
董兆克,张志勇. 2017.农业景观组成影响瓜蚜遗传多样性.绿色生态可持续发展与植物保护//中国植物保护学会第十二次全国会员代表大会暨学术年会论集, 179-180. | |
Dong Z K, Zhang Z Y. 2017. The composition of agricultural landscape affects the genetic diversity of aphids//Green ecological sustainable development and plant protection.The 12th National Congress and Annual Conference of the Chinese Society for Plant Protection, 179-180.[in Chinese] | |
方升佐. 中国杨树人工林培育技术研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2008. 19 (10): 2308- 2316. | |
Fang S Z . Silviculture of poplar plantation in China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008. 19 (10): 2308- 2316. | |
李祖政, 尤海梅, 王梓懿. 徐州城市景观格局对绿地植物多样性的多尺度影响. 应用生态学报, 2018. 29 (6): 1813- 1821. | |
Li Z Z , You H M , Wang Z Y . Multi-scale effects of urban landscape pattern on plant diversity in Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018. 29 (6): 1813- 1821. | |
梁军, 马琳, 黄咏槐, 等. 森林空间结构对松赤枯病发生程度的影响. 林业科学, 2016. 52 (8): 60- 67. | |
Liang J , Ma L , Huang Y H , et al. Impact of forest spatial structure on damaging degree of pine needle blight. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016. 52 (8): 60- 67. | |
刘莉丽, 曹支敏, 樊军锋, 等. 杨树品种叶锈病抗病性研究. 西北林学院学报, 2008. 23 (6): 132- 134. | |
Liu L L , Cao Z M , Fan J F , et al. A study of poplar resistance to Melampsoralarici-populina. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2008. 23 (6): 132- 134. | |
吕全, 张星耀, 梁军, 等. 当代森林病理学的特征. 林业科学, 2012. 48 (7): 135- 144. | |
Lü Q , Zhang X Y , Liang J , et al. Characterization of contemporary forest pathology. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012. 48 (7): 135- 144. | |
孟繁荣, 倪乃, 李茹秀, 等. 青杨叶锈病的综合防治技术. 东北林业大学学报, 1997. 25 (1): 54- 56. | |
Meng F R , Ni N , Li R X , et al. The control techniques of poplar leaves rust disease. Journal of northeast forestry university, 1997. 25 (1): 54- 56. | |
沈瑞祥,周贺. 1979.马格栅锈菌(Melampsora magnusiana Wager)夏孢子萌发生理的探讨.北京林学院学报, 66-69. | |
Shen R X, Zhou H. 1979. Study on physiology of summer spore germination of Melampsora magnusiana Wager. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 66-69.[in Chinese] | |
孙志强, 张星耀, 肖文发, 等. 景观病理学:森林保护学领域的新视角. 林业科学, 2010. 46 (3): 139- 145. | |
Sun Z Q , Zhang X Y , Xiao W F , et al. Landscape pathology:a new perspective in forest protection field. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010. 46 (3): 139- 145. | |
田呈明,曹支敏,梁英梅. 2009.中国杨树叶锈病的研究进展//第二届中国林业学术大会——S5森林病害及其防治论文集, 27-37. | |
Tian C M, Cao Z M, Liang Y M. 2009, Research progress on rust of poplar in China//S5 forest disease and its control. 2nd China Forestry Academic Conference, 27-37.[in Chinese] | |
田呈明, 梁英梅, 康振生, 等. 杨树与栅锈菌互作的组织病理学研究. 林业科学, 2001. 37 (6): 52- 58.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2001.06.010 |
|
Tian C M , Liang Y M , Kang Z S , et al. Histopathology studies on interaction of poplars and leaf rust with different compatibilities. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2001. 37 (6): 52- 58.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2001.06.010 |
|
田晓敏, 闫海霞, 袁业, 等. 塞罕坝自然保护区物种丰富度对植被景观破碎化的响应及其空间尺度差异. 林业科学, 2016. 52 (12): 13- 21.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20161202 |
|
Tian X M , Yan H X , Yuan Y , et al. Response of species richness to the fragmentation of vegetation landscapeand its Spatial variation scales in Saihanba Nature Reserve. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016. 52 (12): 13- 21.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20161202 |
|
王小平, 张飞, 李晓航, 等. 艾比湖区域景观格局空间特征与地表水质的关联分析. 生态学报, 2017. 37 (22): 7438- 7452. | |
Wang X P , Zhang F , Li X H , et al. Correlation analysis between the spatial characteristics of land use/coverlandscape pattern and surface-water quality in the Ebinur Lake Area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017. 37 (22): 7438- 7452. | |
邬建国. 景观生态学——格局、过程、尺度与等级. 北京: 高等教育出版社. 2007. | |
Wu J G . Landscape ecology-pattern, process, scale and hierarchy (2nd edition). Beijing: Advanced Education Pres. 2007. | |
张晨, 牛树奎, 陈锋, 等. 基于GIS的景观格局对云南省森林火灾的影响. 林业科学, 2016. 52 (7): 96- 103. | |
Zhang C , Niu S K , Chen F , et al. Effect of landscape pattern on forest fires in Yunnan Province based on GIS. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016. 52 (7): 96- 103. | |
Bianchi F , Schellhorn N , Cunningham S . Habitat functionality for the ecosystem service of pest control:reproduct6ion and feeding sites of pests and natural enemies. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 2013. 4 (15): 12- 23. | |
Djoudi E A , Plantegenest M , Aviron S , et al. Local vs. landscape characteristics differentially shape emerging and circulating assemblages of carabid beetles in agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2019. 270-271 (2): 149- 158. | |
Duan M , Liu Y , Yu Z , et al. Environmental factors acting at multiple scales determine assemblages of insects and plants in agricultural mountain landscapes of northern China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2016. 224 (5): 86- 94. | |
Garnas J R , Ayres M P , Liebhold A M , et al. Subcontinental impacts of an invasive tree disease on forest structure and dynamics. Journal of Ecology, 2011. 99 (2): 532- 541. | |
Hasui É , Silva V X , Cunha R G T , et al. Additions of landscape metrics improve predictions of occurrence of species distribution models. Journal of Forestry Research, 2017. 28 (5): 963- 974.
doi: 10.1007/s11676-017-0388-5 |
|
Hawn C L , Herrmann J D , Griffin S R , et al. Connectivity increases trophic subsidies in fragmented landscapes. Ecology Letters, 2018. 21 (11): 1620- 1628.
doi: 10.1111/ele.12958 |
|
Lexer M F , Fay J A , Joseph M S , et al. Barrier to gene flow between two ecologically divergent Populus species, P. alba (white poplar) and P. tremula (European aspen):the role of ecology and life history in gene introgression. Molecular Ecology, 2005. 14 (4): 1045- 1057.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02469.x |
|
MacLean M G , Congalton R G . A comparison of landscape fragmentation analysis programs for identifying possible invasive plant species locations in forest edge. Landscape Ecology, 2015. 30 (7): 1241- 1256.
doi: 10.1007/s10980-015-0175-7 |
|
McCallum H , Dobson A . Disease, habitat fragmentation and conservation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences, 2002. 269 (1504): 2041- 2049.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2079 |
|
Plantegenest M , Le May C , Fabre F . Landscape epidemiology of plant diseases. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2007. 4 (16): 963- 972.
doi: 10.1098/rsif.2007.1114 |
|
Rigot T , Halder I , Jactel H . Landscape diversity slows the spread of an invasive forest pest species. Ecography, 2014. 37 (7): 648- 658.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00447.x |
|
Riitters K H , O'Neill R V , Hunsaker C T , et al. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecology, 1995. 10 (1): 23- 39.
doi: 10.1007/BF00158551 |
|
Rösch V , Tscharntke T , Scherber C , et al. Landscape composition, connectivity and fragment size drive effects of grassland fragmentation on insect communities. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013. 50 (2): 387- 394. | |
Rusch A , Delbac L , Thiery D . Grape moth density in Bordeaux vineyards depends on local habitat management despite effects of landscape heterogeneity on their biological control. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017. 54 (6): 1794- 1803.
doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12858 |
|
Schellhorn N A , Gagic V , Bommarco R . Time will tell:resource continuity bolsters ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2015. 30 (9): 524- 530. | |
Senf C , Campbell E M , Pflugmacher D , et al. A multi-scale analysis of western spruce budworm outbreak dynamics. Landscape Ecology, 2017. 32 (3): 501- 514.
doi: 10.1007/s10980-016-0460-0 |
|
Tan S T, Xu Z, Ti P. 2015. A comparative study on effects of spatial aggregation for Globe Land 30.23rd International Conference on Geoinformatics. | |
Tian C , Shang Y , Zhuang J , et al. Morphological and molecular phylogenetic analysis of Melampsora species on poplars in China. Mycoscience, 2004. 45 (1): 56- 66.
doi: 10.1007/S10267-003-0150-Z |
|
Traub B , Kleinn C . Measuring fragmentation and structural diversity. Forstw Centralblatt, 1999. 118, 39- 50.
doi: 10.1007/BF02768972 |
|
Tscharntke T , Tylianakis J M , Rand T A , et al. Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes-eight hypotheses. Biological Reviews, 2012. 87 (3): 661- 685.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00216.x |
|
Václavík T , Kanaskie A , Hansen E M , et al. Predicting potential and actual distribution of sudden oak death in Oregon:prioritizing landscape contexts for early detection and eradication of disease outbreaks. Forest Ecology and Management, 2010. 260 (6): 1026- 1035.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.026 |
|
Vannette R , Leopold D , Fukami T . Forest area and connectivity influence root-associated fungal communities in a fragmented landscape. Ecology, 2016. 97 (9): 2374- 2383.
doi: 10.1002/ecy.1472 |
|
Vialle A , Frey P , Hambleton S , et al. Poplar rust systematics and refinement of Melampsora species delineation. Fungal Diversity, 2011. 50 (1): 227- 248.
doi: 10.1007/s13225-011-0129-6 |
|
Wang X , Blanchet F G , Koper N . Measuring habitat fragmentation:an evaluation of landscape pattern metrics. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2014. 5 (7): 634- 646.
doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12198 |
|
Weking S , Kämpf I , Mathar W , et al. Effects of land use and landscape patterns on Orthoptera communities in the Western Siberian forest steppe. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2016. 25 (12): 2341- 2359.
doi: 10.1007/s10531-016-1107-9 |
|
Wu J G . Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis:scaling relations. Landscape Ecology, 2004. 19 (2): 125- 138.
doi: 10.1023/B:LAND.0000021711.40074.ae |
|
Yang L , Liu B , Zhang Q , et al. Landscape structure alters the abundance and species composition of early-season aphid populations in wheat fields. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2019. 269 (1): 167- 173. | |
Zhang L , Wu J , Zhen Y , et al. RETRACTED:a GIS-based gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern of Shanghai metropolitan area, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004. 69 (1): 1- 16.
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.006 |
[1] | 金佳莉,王成,贾宝全. 我国4个典型城市近30年绿色空间时空演变规律[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(3): 61-72. |
[2] | 方加兴, 武承旭, 卢文娟, 刘福, 张苏芳, 张真, 孔祥波. 横坑切梢小蠹林间危害与诱捕量之间的相关性分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(4): 129-135. |
[3] | 梁森苗, 张淑文, 任海英, 郑锡良, 戚行江. 蜡杨梅与杨梅种间嫁接及亲缘关系分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(4): 171-177. |
[4] | 贾宝全, 仇宽彪. 北京市第二道绿化隔离区林木树冠覆盖特征与景观格局变化[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(2): 13-21. |
[5] | 邱霓, 徐颂军, 邱彭华, 杨文槐, 杨秀, 杨倩. 珠海淇澳岛红树林群落分布与景观格局[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(1): 1-10. |
[6] | 贾宝全, 刘秀萍. 北京市第一道绿化隔离区树冠覆盖特征与景观生态变化[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(9): 1-10. |
[7] | 张晨, 牛树奎, 陈锋, 邵潇, 王欢. 基于GIS的景观格局对云南省森林火灾的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(7): 96-103. |
[8] | 陈存, 丁昌俊, 苏晓华, 黄秦军. 欧美杨纤维含量构成因素的相关和通径分析[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(11): 124-133. |
[9] | 白宇清, 谢利娟, 王定跃, 孙延军. 毛棉杜鹃对不同光照及土壤排水条件的生长及生理响应[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(1): 48-54. |
[10] | 蒋新元, 廖媛媛, 郭忠, 孟安, 黄泽才, 杨素文. 7种果壳的热解特性及与主要组分相关性分析[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(12): 79-86. |
[11] | 刘万德, 李帅锋, 郎学东, 缪迎春, 苏磊, 苏建荣. 云南红豆杉人工药用原料林春芽数量及其动态[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(8): 161-167. |
[12] | 马闯, 张文辉, 吴敏, 马莉薇, 周建云, 薛瑶芹. 栓皮栎幼苗根系发育对环境异质性的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(10): 58-65. |
[13] | 李敏;赵鹏祥;郝红科;杨延征;袁飞. 陕北黄龙山林区景观格局动态[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(12): 109-115. |
[14] | 许东;于大炮;邓红兵;代力民. 采伐参数对森林景观格局的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(5): 150-152. |
[15] | 史久西;邓劲松;王小明;骆成方;裘鑫灿. 乡村景观格局热效应及其调控机制[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(5): 7-15. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||