林业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (4): 12-24.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20250487
白浪1,格桑旺堆2,郑永林3,张润哲4,程士宝5,王云琦3,*(
)
收稿日期:2025-08-01
出版日期:2026-04-15
发布日期:2026-04-11
通讯作者:
王云琦
E-mail:wangyunqi@bjfu.edu.cn
基金资助:
Lang Bai1, Gesangwangdui2,Yonglin Zheng3,Runzhe Zhang4,Shibao Cheng5,Yunqi Wang3,*(
)
Received:2025-08-01
Online:2026-04-15
Published:2026-04-11
Contact:
Yunqi Wang
E-mail:wangyunqi@bjfu.edu.cn
摘要:
目的: 基于树轮生态学和稳定同位素技术,探讨长期酸雨胁迫下马尾松和栲树的径向生长趋势及其对水分和氮素变化的生理响应,为酸雨防控区的森林经营和树种选择提供科学依据。方法: 以重庆市缙云山三峡库区国家自然保护区为研究区,选取马尾松和栲树为研究对象,利用树轮宽度、稳定碳和氮同位素技术,计算碳同位素比值(δ13C)和内在水分利用效率(iWUE)等指标,结合酸雨主要组分(SO42?、NO3?和NH4+)的沉降量和气候数据,运用分段回归分析、多元线性模型定量分析长期酸雨胁迫对树木生长及其生理指标的影响。结果: 1) 长期酸雨胁迫显著抑制马尾松和栲树的生长速率,但二者的响应模式存在差异。1981—2010年酸雨胁迫较重期间,马尾松的径向生长显著下降(P < 0.001),栲树生长趋于停滞(P > 0.05);2011—2020年,随着酸雨胁迫强度减弱,两树种生长呈现显著恢复态势(P < 0.05),且马尾松的恢复速率更快。2) 在水分利用方面,马尾松的iWUE在酸雨减缓阶段(2011—2020年)显著下降(P < 0.01),而栲树未表现出显著变化(P > 0.05),反映出针阔叶树种在水分利用策略上的差异。3) 马尾松生长仅受SO42?的显著负向影响(P < 0.001),iWUE与胸高断面积年增长量呈显著负相关(P < 0.001),表明保守的水分利用策略制约其径向生长;栲树生长除受SO42?和NO3?抑制外,还与NH4+沉降量呈显著正相关(P < 0.001),且其δ15N在酸雨减缓期保持稳定。结论: 马尾松和栲树在长期酸雨胁迫下表现出明显不同的生长和生理适应策略,马尾松因采取保守的水分调节策略且未能有效利用氮沉降,表现出对SO42?胁迫的高敏感性;栲树凭借对NH4+的有效利用和水碳协同调节,展现出比马尾松更强的生长恢复潜力。亚热带森林经营宜坚持适地适树,采取多树种混交与分区配置,并配套酸沉降长期监测和土壤改良措施,以提升群落恢复力和抗逆性。
中图分类号:
白浪,格桑旺堆,郑永林,张润哲,程士宝,王云琦. 长期酸雨胁迫下马尾松和栲树的生长与生理响应差异[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(4): 12-24.
Lang Bai, Gesangwangdui,Yonglin Zheng,Runzhe Zhang,Shibao Cheng,Yunqi Wang. Differences in Growth and Physiological Responses of Pinus massoniana and Castanopsis fargesii under Long-Term Acid Rain Stress[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2026, 62(4): 12-24.
表2
马尾松和栲的标准年表统计特征"
| 统计特征 Statistic characters | 马尾松 Pinus massoniana | 栲树 Castanopsis fargesii |
| 平均敏感度 Mean sensitivity | 0.157 | 0.119 |
| 标准差 Standard deviation | 0.207 | 0.192 |
| 信噪比 Signal-to-noise ration | 16.203 | 5.68 |
| 样本总体代表性 Express population signal | 0.942 | 0.852 |
| 一阶自相关系数 First order autocorrelation | 0.553 | 0.266 |
| 第一主成分方差解释量 Variance in first eigenvector(%) | 34.71 | 46.1 |
图4
树木BAI、iWUE和δ15N与月尺度酸雨因子的相关性 PM:马尾松 Pinus massoniana;CF:栲树 Castanopsis fargesii。T代表月平均气温,Pre代表月均降水量,SO42?、NO3?、NH4+和 pH 分别代表月酸沉降中的硫酸根、硝酸根、铵根沉降量及降水 pH 值。iWUE代表水分利用效率,BAI代表断面积增长量,p11和p12分别代表前一年11月和前一年12月,1~10代表当年的1月到10月。扇形面积大小代表相关系数的绝对值,颜色代表相关性的正负(棕色为正,绿色为负)。右侧颜色条代表相关系数 r。* 表示P < 0.05,** 表示P < 0.01,*** 表示P < 0.001,NS 表示P > 0.05。"
|
陈 峰, 袁玉江, 魏文寿, 等. 福建沙县马尾松树轮宽度与夏季亚洲-太平洋涛动指数的关系. 第四纪研究, 2011, 31 (1): 96- 103.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7410.2011.01.13 |
|
|
Chen F, Yuan Y J, Wei W S, et al. Correlations between the summer Asian Pacific oscillation index and the tree-ring width of Pinus massiniana from Sha County, Fujian Province. Quaternary Sciences, 2011, 31 (1): 96- 103.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7410.2011.01.13 |
|
| 刘可慧, 彭少麟, 莫江明, 等. 酸沉降对森林植物影响过程和机理. 生态环境, 2005, 14 (6): 953- 960. | |
| Liu K H, Peng S L, Mo J M, et al. The Process and mechanism of rain deposition upon forest plants. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2005, 14 (6): 953- 960. | |
| 裴承敏. 2019. 三峡库区三种植物对模拟酸雨的响应机制研究. 北京: 北京林业大学. | |
| Pei C M. 2019. Response mechanism of three plants to simulated acid rain in the Three Gorges Reservoir area. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University. [in Chinese] | |
| 王 娇, 关 欣, 黄 苛, 等. 酸沉降对森林生态系统碳循环关键过程的影响研究进展. 应用与环境生物学报, 2021, 27 (3): 776- 785. | |
| Wang J, Guan X, Huang K, et al. Effect of acid deposition on the key processes in the carbon cycle of forest ecosystems: a review. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2021, 27 (3): 776- 785. | |
| 许第发, 钟天祥, 徐冬梅, 等. 酸沉降对土壤地球化学过程的影响. 地质地球化学, 2002, 30 (4): 68- 74. | |
| Xu D F, Zhong T X, Xu D M, et al. Effects of acid deposition on soil geochemical cycles. Geology-Geochemistry, 2002, 30 (4): 68- 74. | |
| 杨 凤, 王云琦, 王玉杰, 等. 酸雨胁迫对缙云山马尾松幼苗光合生理特性的影响. 长江流域资源与环境, 2022, (1): 124- 134. | |
| Yang F, Wang Y Q, Wang Y J, et al. Effects of acid rain stress on photosynthetic physiological characteristics of Pinus massoniana seedlings in Jinyun Mountain. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2022, (1): 124- 134. | |
|
余 倩, 段 雷, 郝吉明. 中国酸沉降: 来源、影响与控制. 环境科学学报, 2021, 41 (3): 731- 746.
doi: 10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2020.0340 |
|
|
Yu Q, Duan L, Hao J M. Acid deposition in China: sources, effects and control. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2021, 41 (3): 731- 746.
doi: 10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2020.0340 |
|
| 张丽云, 邓湘雯, 雷相东, 等. 不同生长阶段马尾松生产力与气候因子的关系. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32 (5): 1104- 1110. | |
| Zhang L Y, Deng X W, Lei X D, et al. Pinus massoniana productivity at different age stages in relation to climatic factors. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013, 32 (5): 1104- 1110. | |
| 张新民, 柴发合, 王淑兰, 等. 中国酸雨研究现状. 环境科学研究, 2010, 23 (5): 527- 532. | |
| Zhang X M, Chai F H, Wang S L, et al. Research progress of acid precipitation in China. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2010, 23 (5): 527- 532. | |
|
Cecchini G, Andreetta A, Marchetto A, et al. Atmospheric deposition control of soil acidification in central Italy. Catena, 2019, 182, 104102.
doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2019.104102 |
|
|
Chen Z, Wang Y H, Chen R S, et al. Effects of forest type on nutrient fluxes in throughfall, stemflow, and litter leachate within acid-polluted locations in southwest China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19 (5): 2810.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052810 |
|
|
Dong D, Du E Z, Sun Z Z, et al. Non-linear direct effects of acid rain on leaf photosynthetic rate of terrestrial plants. Environmental Pollution, 2017, 231, 1442- 1445.
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.005 |
|
| Ehleringer J R, Hall A E, Farquhar G D. 1993. Stable isotopes and plant carbon-water relations. New York: Academic Press. | |
|
Farquhar G D, Ehleringer J R, Hubick K T. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 1989, 40, 503- 537.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443 |
|
| Fauset S, Freitas H C, Galbraith D R, et al. 2018. Differences in leaf thermoregulation and water use strategies between three co-occurring Atlantic forest tree species. Plant, Cell & Environment, 41(7): 1618−1631. | |
|
Feng X H. Trends in intrinsic water-use efficiency of natural trees for the past 100–200 years: a response to atmospheric CO2 concentration. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1999, 63 (13/14): 1891- 1903.
doi: 10.1016/s0016-7037(99)00088-5 |
|
|
Frank D C, Poulter B, Saurer M, et al. Water-use efficiency and transpiration across European forests during the Anthropocene. Nature Climate Change, 2015, 5 (6): 579- 583.
doi: 10.1038/nclimate2614 |
|
|
Gadermaier J, Vospernik S, Grabner M, et al. Soil water storage capacity and soil nutrients drive tree ring growth of six European tree species across a steep environmental gradient. Forest Ecology and Management, 2024, 554, 121599.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121599 |
|
|
Gentilesca T, Battipaglia G, Borghetti M, et al. Evaluating growth and intrinsic water-use efficiency in hardwood and conifer mixed plantations. Trees, 2021, 35 (4): 1329- 1340.
doi: 10.1007/s00468-021-02120-z |
|
|
Itahashi S, Ge B Z, Sato K, et al. MICS-Asia III: overview of model intercomparison and evaluation of acid deposition over Asia. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2020, 20 (5): 2667- 2693.
doi: 10.5194/acp-20-2667-2020 |
|
|
Kuang Y W, Sun F F, Wen D Z, et al. Tree-ring growth patterns of masson pine (Pinus massoniana L.) during the recent decades in the acidification Pearl River Delta of China. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 255 (8/9): 3534- 3540.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.02.036 |
|
|
Li Y F, Wang Y Q, Wang Y J, et al. Effects of simulated acid rain on soil respiration and its component in a mixed coniferous-broadleaved forest of the Three Gorges Reservoir area in Southwest China. Forest Ecosystems, 2019, 6 (1): 32.
doi: 10.1186/s40663-019-0192-0 |
|
| Li Y Q, Xu C X, Huang Y M, et al., 2023,. Tree growth and intrinsic water use efficiency of Chinese pine plantations along a precipitation gradient in northern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 528: 120609. | |
|
Liu X, Ma S L, Jia Z H, et al. Complex effects of different types of acid rain on root growth of Quercus acutissima and Cunninghamia lanceolata saplings. Ecological Processes, 2022, 11 (1): 8.
doi: 10.1186/s13717-021-00351-z |
|
|
Liu Z Q, Chen J Y, Su Z J, et al. Acid rain reduces plant-photosynthesized carbon sequestration and soil microbial network complexity. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 873, 162030.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162030 |
|
|
Mathias J M, Thomas R B. Disentangling the effects of acidic air pollution, atmospheric CO2, and climate change on recent growth of red spruce trees in the central Appalachian Mountains. Global Change Biology, 2018, 24 (9): 3938- 3953.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.14273 |
|
|
Medeiros J S, Tomeo N J, Hewins C R, et al. Fast-growing Acer rubrum differs from slow-growing Quercus alba in leaf, xylem and hydraulic trait coordination responses to simulated acid rain. Tree Physiology, 2016, 36 (8): 1032- 1044.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpw045 |
|
|
Merlin M, Hylen G, Vergarechea M, et al. Climate-growth relationships for Norway spruce and Scots pine remained relatively stable in Norway over the past 60 years despite significant warming trends. Forest Ecology and Management, 2024, 569, 122180.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122180 |
|
|
Norton D A, Palmer J G, Ogden J. Dendroecological studies in New Zealand 1. An evaluation of tree age estimates based on increment cores. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 1987, 25 (3): 373- 383.
doi: 10.1080/0028825X.1987.10413355 |
|
|
Oulehle F, Šamonil P, Urban O, et al. Growth and assemblage dynamics of temperate forest tree species match physiological resilience to changes in atmospheric chemistry. Global Change Biology, 2025, 31 (3): e70147.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.70147 |
|
|
Peñuelas J, Canadell J G, Ogaya R. Increased water-use efficiency during the 20th century did not translate into enhanced tree growth. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2011, 20 (4): 597- 608.
doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00608.x |
|
|
Qi X, Cherubini P, Treydte K, et al. Growth responses to climate warming and their physiological mechanisms differ between mature and young larch trees in a boreal permafrost region. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2023, 343, 109765.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109765 |
|
|
Ren M, Liu Y, Li Q, et al. Responses of tree growth and intrinsic water use efficiency to environmental factors in central and northern China in the context of global warming. Forests, 2022, 13 (8): 1209.
doi: 10.3390/f13081209 |
|
| Rodríguez-Sánchez V M, Rosas U, Calva-Vásquez G, et al. 2020. Does acid rain alter the leaf anatomy and photosynthetic pigments in urban trees? Plants, 9(7): 862. | |
|
Saurer M, Siegwolf R T W, Schweingruber F H. Carbon isotope discrimination indicates improving water-use efficiency of trees in northern Eurasia over the last 100 years. Global Change Biology, 2004, 10 (12): 2109- 2120.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00869.x |
|
|
Shetti R, Boonen K, Smiljanić M, et al. Do trees respond to pollution? A network study of the impact of pollution on spruce growth from Europe. Environmental Pollution, 2024, 350, 124012.
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124012 |
|
|
Shi Z J, Zhang J E, Xiao Z H, et al. Effects of acid rain on plant growth: a meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 297, 113213.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113213 |
|
|
Succarie A, Xu Z H, Wang W J. The variation and trends of nitrogen cycling and nitrogen isotope composition in tree rings: the potential for fingerprinting climate extremes and bushfires. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2022, 22 (9): 2343- 2353.
doi: 10.1007/s11368-022-03260-6 |
|
|
Thomas R B, Spal S E, Smith K R, et al. Evidence of recovery of Juniperus virginiana trees from sulfur pollution after the Clean Air Act. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013, 110 (38): 15319- 15324.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308115110 |
|
| Wang Z Y, Liu X H, Wang K Y, et al. 2022. Tree-ring δ15N of Qinghai spruce in the central Qilian Mountains of China: is pre-treatment of wood samples necessary? Journal of Arid Land, 14(6): 673-690. | |
|
Wason J W, Beier C M, Battles J J, et al. Acidic deposition and climate warming as drivers of tree growth in high-elevation spruce-fir forests of the northeastern US. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 2019, 2, 63.
doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2019.00063 |
|
|
Yang R Q, Fu P L, Fan Z X, et al. Growth-climate sensitivity of two pine species shows species-specific changes along temperature and moisture gradients in southwest China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2022, 318, 108907.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108907 |
|
|
Zeng A Y, Zhou F F, Li W, et al. Tree-ring indicators of winter-spring temperature in central China over the past 200 years. Dendrochronologia, 2019, 58, 125634.
doi: 10.1016/j.dendro.2019.125634 |
|
|
Zhang Y, Li J H, Tan J Y, et al. An overview of the direct and indirect effects of acid rain on plants: relationships among acid rain, soil, microorganisms, and plants. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 873, 162388.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162388 |
|
|
Zhang Y W, Guo Y P, Tang Z Y, et al. Patterns of nitrogen and phosphorus pools in terrestrial ecosystems in China. Earth System Science Data, 2021, 13 (11): 5337- 5351.
doi: 10.5194/essd-13-5337-2021 |
|
|
Zheng Y L, Wang Y Q, Wang W C, et al. Growth inhibition and recovery of Pinus massoniana in Chongqing since the 1980s. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 168, 112809.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112809 |
|
|
Zhou S J, Zhang M, Chen S Z, et al. Acid resistance of masson pine (Pinus massoniana Lamb.) families and their root morphology and physiological response to simulated acid deposition. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10 (1): 22066.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79043-1 |
| [1] | 梁璇,王力. 毛乌素沙地地下水埋深驱动樟子松水分利用趋深适应与效率提升[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(2): 53-65. |
| [2] | 杨乐梅,张宝刚,陈有超,蔡延江. 毛竹林林下植物叶片功能性状的模拟氮沉降响应[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(12): 61-71. |
| [3] | 白雪娟,翟国庆,刘敬泽. 13C稳定同位素在陆地生态系统植物-微生物-土壤碳循环中的应用[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(7): 175-190. |
| [4] | 李晓,贾淑娴,席颖青,杨柳明,刘小飞. 凋落物添加与去除对米槠天然林土壤微生物残体碳的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(10): 12-20. |
| [5] | 柳利利,韩磊,王娜娜,周鹏,马云蕾,马军. 宁夏河东沙区柠条和新疆杨在纯林和混交林中的水分利用策略[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(10): 40-49. |
| [6] | 郑永林,王云琦,徐晓晓,王玉杰,李耀明. 重庆缙云山马尾松和润楠径向生长的酸雨响应[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(1): 58-67. |
| [7] | 普慧梅,李源,吴锦奎,马泽,宋维峰. 哈尼梯田水源区3种典型植被下不同水体的氢氧稳定同位素特征及相互关系[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(5): 1-9. |
| [8] | 杨静,张耀艺,谭思懿,廖姝,王定一,岳楷,倪祥银,吴福忠,杨玉盛. 中亚热带不同树种对土壤团聚体组成及其碳、氮含量的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(4): 51-61. |
| [9] | 丛日荻,秦树林,金光泽. 微地形对粗皮红松和细皮红松分布与生长的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(12): 1-11. |
| [10] | 武盼盼,曾利剑,雷平,胡丹丹,李锦隆,王满堂,钟全林. 江西武夷山南方铁杉林主要树种叶片养分含量及再吸收效率[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(1): 12-21. |
| [11] | 房焕英,肖胜生,余小芳,熊永,欧阳勋志,秦晓蕾. 湿地松人工林土壤呼吸及其组分对模拟酸雨的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(7): 20-31. |
| [12] | 高艳丽,杨智杰,张丽,熊德成. 不同更新方式对亚热带常绿阔叶林土壤氮矿化的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(4): 24-31. |
| [13] | 王彬,于澎涛,于艺鹏,张雷,王彦辉,万艳芳,杨文娟,王顺利,刘贤德. 祁连山不同年龄青海云杉径向生长对气候变化的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(3): 1-8. |
| [14] | 刘静如,曹艺,李晗,张丽,游成铭,徐振锋,谭波. 四川低山丘陵区香樟和马尾松凋落叶分解进程中土壤节肢动物多样性[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(11): 119-133. |
| [15] | 李春干,李振. 机载激光雷达大区域亚热带森林参数估测的普适性模型式[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(10): 23-35. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||