欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (9): 130-141.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190914

• 论文与研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

冀北山区不同植被恢复类型根际土壤细菌群落结构及多样性

王安宁1,2, 黄秋娴1, 李晓刚1, 徐学华1, 李玉灵1,3   

  1. 1. 河北农业大学林学院 保定 071000;
    2. 北京林业大学水土保持学院 北京 100083;
    3. 河北省林木种质资源与森林保护重点实验室 保定 071000
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-08 修回日期:2018-12-09 发布日期:2019-10-28
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0500806-07);河北省高层次人才资助项目(132014010004)。

Bacterial Community Structure and Diversity in Rhizosphere Soil of Different Vegetation Restoration Patterns in Mountainous Areas of Northern Hebei

Wang Anning1,2, Huang Qiuxian1, Li Xiaogang1, Xu Xuehua1, Li Yuling1,3   

  1. 1. College of Forestry, Hebei Agricultural University Baoding 071000;
    2. College of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University Beijing 100083;
    3. Hebei Key Laboratory of Forest Germplasm Resources and Forest Protection Baoding 071000
  • Received:2018-04-08 Revised:2018-12-09 Published:2019-10-28

摘要: [目的]研究冀北山区不同植被恢复类型对根际土壤细菌群落结构特征和多样性影响,探索自然和人工恢复对土壤微生物的作用机制,为该区域植被恢复与管理提供理论依据。[方法]以自然恢复的灌草丛、灌木林、次生林以及人工恢复的人工林根面、根际和非根际土为研究对象,通过Illumina Miseq平台对细菌16S rRNA的V3-V4片段进行高通量测序,分析土壤细菌α、β和功能多样性、群落结构组成以及与环境因子的关系。[结果]1)各恢复类型细菌α多样性差异显著(P<0.05),次生林土壤细菌丰度和多样性均高于人工林,灌草丛多样性高,丰度最低;灌木林丰度高,多样性最低。不同根际范围土壤细菌α多样性差异不显著(P>0.05),整体表现为根面和根际土高于非根际土。2)次生林和人工林土壤细菌群落结构有一定相似性;次生林与灌草丛、灌木林土壤细菌群落结构差异较大。根际土与非根际土细菌群落结构有一定相似性,根面土与根际、非根际土细菌结构差异较大。3)变形菌门、放线菌门、拟杆菌门、酸杆菌门、芽单胞菌门和厚壁菌门为优势类群。各样地有机质分解菌群(变形菌门、放线菌门和拟杆菌门)丰度差异显著,灌草丛和次生林显著高于其他样地,根面和根际土显著高于非根际土。固碳和固氮菌群(芽单胞菌门和厚壁菌门)分布较均匀。4)土壤田间持水量、有机质和全磷、植被分布均匀度、Simpson多样性指数和丰富度指数是影响土壤细菌群落的主要因素。土壤因子(田间持水量、有机质和全磷)对灌木林和灌草丛非根际土细菌影响极显著,对根面和根际土细菌作用较小;植被因子(植被分布均匀度、Simpson多样性指数和丰富度指数)对乔木林(次生林和人工林)不同根际范围土壤细菌群落影响均达到极显著水平。5)新陈代谢功能在KEGG上的编码基因数量最多,是土壤细菌的优势功能。各土样细菌群落KEGG功能基因序列数量和多样性差异显著,说明各植被恢复类型根际土壤中有许多具有各自独特功能的菌种,但土壤和植被不能决定土壤细菌功能多样性。[结论]恢复方式、植被类型和根系对冀北山区土壤细菌群落结构和多样性均有影响,其中恢复方式对土壤细菌多样性作用更明显,植被类型对土壤细菌群落结构影响更显著。距离根系越近,土壤细菌多样性越高,土壤细菌群落结构与非根际土差异越大。此外,环境因子如土壤养分、水分含量及植被分布状况等均与土壤细菌群落结构及多样性有关。

关键词: 冀北山区, 植被恢复, Illumina Miseq测序, 根际土, 细菌群落结构

Abstract: [Objective]This study aimed to investigate the influence of different vegetation restoration patterns in mountainous areas of northern Hebei on the structural characteristics and functional diversity of rhizosphere soil bacterial community, and to explore the mechanisms of natural and artificial restoration measures on soil microorganism, so as to provide theoretical foundation for vegetation restoration and management in the region.[Method]The rhizoplane, rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils of the natural restored scrub-grassland, shrubbery and secondary forest, as well as the artificial restored forest were targeted, and high-throughput sequencing of V3-V4 fragment of bacterial 16S rRNA was conducted by using the Illumina Miseq platform, to analyze the α, β and functional diversities of the soil bacteria, as well as the communities structure and their relationships with the environmental factors.[Result] 1) the α-diversity of soil bacteria among different restoration patterns was significantly different (P<0.05). The abundance and diversity of soil bacteria in secondary forest were all higher than those of artificial forest. To be specific, the scrub-grassland had higher diversity but the lowest abundance, while the shrubbery had higher abundance but the lowest diversity. There was no significant difference in the bacterial α-diversity among different rhizosphere ranges (P>0.05) The bacterial α-diversity in root surface and rhizosphere soils were relatively higher than that in non-rhizosphere soil. 2) There were certain similarities in soil bacterial community structure between secondary forests and artificial forests. However, there were big differences in soil bacterial community structure between secondary forests and scrub-grassland and shrubbery. Moreover, there was big difference in the soil bacterial community structure between root surface soil and rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils, while the bacterial community structure of rhizosphere soil was similar with that of non-rhizosphere soil. 3) Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes and Firmicutes were the dominant groups. Meanwhile, the abundance of bacterial communities (Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes) decomposing organic matter among all sample lands was significantly different; specifically, the abundance of scrub-grassland and secondary forest was remarkably higher than that in other vegetation types The abundance in root surface and rhizosphere soils was also markedly higher than that in the non-rhizosphere soil. Besides, the carbon-fixing and nitrogen-fixing bacteria (Gemmatimonadetes and Firmicutes) were relatively evenly distributed. 4) Soil field water holding capacity, organic matter and total phosphorus, vegetation distribution uniformity, Simpson diversity index and abundance index were the major factors affecting the soil bacterial communities. Typically, soil factors (including soil field water holding capacity, organic matter and total phosphorus) had distinct influence on the non-rhizosphere soil bacteria of shrubbery and scrub-grassland, but had little effect on the root surface and rhizosphere soil bacteria. Moreover, vegetation factors (vegetation distribution uniformity, Simpson diversity index and abundance index) had extremely significant influence on the soil bacterial communities within different rhizosphere ranges of arbor species (secondary forest and artificial forest). 5) The number of genes encoding metabolism function on KEGG was the largest, which was the dominant function of soil bacteria. There were significant differences in the number and diversity of KEGG functional gene sequences among all soil bacterial communities, suggesting that there were numerous bacterial species with unique functions in rhizosphere soils from all vegetation restoration patterns. However, soil and vegetation could not determine the functional diversity of soil bacteria.[Conclusion]Restoration modes, vegetation types and roots all can affect the soil bacterial community structure and diversity in mountainous areas of northern Hebei, among which, the restoration modes have more obvious effect on soil bacterial diversity, while vegetation types have more significant effect on soil bacterial community structure. The closer to the root system, the higher the diversity of soil bacteria, the greater the difference between soil bacterial community structure and non-rhizosphere soil. Moreover, environmental factors, such as soil nutrient, moisture content and vegetation distribution, are all related to the soil bacterial community structure and diversity.

Key words: mountainous areas of northern Hebei, vegetation restoration, Illumina Miseq sequencing, rhizosphere soil, bacterial structure

中图分类号: