容器类型和胚根短截对栓皮栎容器苗苗木质量及造林初期效果的影响

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20170606

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的] 容器类型和胚根短截可有效调控苗木质量，同时采用2种措施培育苗木，从苗圃和造林2个阶段探讨对苗木质量的叠加效应，为丰富苗木质量的调控措施提供参考。[方法] 以栓皮栎容器苗为研究对象，将胚根短截（RP）和不短截对照（CK）的种子分别播在2种容器（D40，Slit）中，测定苗圃阶段栓皮栎根系结构、生长、养分浓度和造林效果。[结果] 容器类型和胚根短截的交互作用对根系结构和养分浓度影响显著，D40-CK组合促进<2 mm径级根系发育，并提高根系总表面积和体积，而D40-RP组合有利于提高K浓度，证实2种育苗方式组合研究的必要性。主效应表明，D40容器更加有利于2~5 mm径级根系发育和苗木地上部分的生长，但导致苗木根茎比下降；造林1年后依然促进幼树高和地径生长；造林2年后，促进作用消失。胚根短截抑制>5 mm径级根系发育，并且对苗高、地径和根生物量有负面影响；造林1年后，对幼树高和地径的抑制作用依然存在；造林2年后，胚根短截处理的成活率显著降低，但促进根系生长和养分吸收。[结论] 苗木根系结构、生长、养分和造林初期效果证实采用容器类型和胚根短截组合调控苗木质量的必要性。培育主根发达树种栓皮栎的最佳组合为D40容器和胚根不短截（CK）。

关键词: 栓皮栎, 容器类型, 胚根短截, 根系结构, 造林效果

Abstract: [Objective] Container type and radicle pruning have been individually proved to effectively regulate seedling quality. In current study, we examined whether the combination of these two approaches could yield a superior effects on seedling performance during nursery and field phases in order to provide reference for the container seedling cultivation. [Method] Quercus variabilis seeds with the radicle pruned (RP) or control (CK) were sown in two different container type (D40 and Slit). Root architecture, seedling growth, nutrient concentration and subsequent field performance of the seedlings were investigated. [Result] Container type and radicle pruning significantly interacted root architecture and nutrient concentration, the combination of D40-CK improved growth of roots with diameter < 2 mm, and increased total root surface area and volume while the combination of D40-RP increased K concentration, indicating the necessity of combining the two approaches. The main effects indicated that D40 treatment increased growth if roots with diameter for 2－5 mm and aboveground, but decreased R/S in the nursery. The D40 treatment promoted seedling height and RCD growth within the first year after outplanting. However, the promotion disappeared in the second year after outplanting. Radicle pruning treatment decreased growth of roots with diameter > 5 mm, seedling height, RCD and root dry mass of seedlings in the nursery. The pruning treatment still inhibited height and RCD growth of seedlings in the first year after outplanting. Radicle pruning treatment decreased survival but improved root growth and nutrient uptake in the second outplanting season. [Conclusion] Both the interactive and main effects of container type and radicle pruning on root architecture, seedling growth, nutrient status and early field performance indicated that it is necessary to combine the two approaches to improve seedling quality. The optimum combination of D40 container and non-radicle pruning (CK) was recommended for container seedling production of Q. variabilis with a dominant taproot.

Key words: Quercus variabilis, container type, radicle pruning, root architecture, field performance

中图分类号:

S723.133

刘佳嘉, 李国雷, 刘勇, 尚治国. 容器类型和胚根短截对栓皮栎容器苗苗木质量及造林初期效果的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(6): 47-55.

Liu Jiajia, Li Guolei, Liu Yong, Shang Zhiguo. Combined Effects of Container Type and Radicle Pruning on Seedling Quality and Early Field Performance of Quercus variabilis Container Seedlings[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(6): 47-55.

参考文献

李国雷, 刘勇, 祝燕, 等. 2012. 国外容器苗质量调控技术研究进展. 林业科学, 48(8): 135-142.
(Li G L, Liu Y, Zhu Y,et al. 2012. A review on the abroad studies of techniques in regulating quality of container seedling. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 48(8): 135-142. [in Chinese])
林志鹏. 2000. 切根育苗对马尾松苗木及幼林生长的效应. 西南林学院学报, 20(4): 196-199.
(Lin Z P. 2000. Effect of radicle pruning on Pinus massoniana seedlings and young forest growth. Journal of Southwest Forestry College, 20(4): 196-199. [in Chinese])
刘永生, 旷天水. 2008. 闽楠芽苗截根移栽育苗技术. 现代农业科技, (20): 30-31.
(Liu Y S, Kuang T S. 2008. Technique of radicle pruning transplanting on Phoebe bournei. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, (20): 30-31. [in Chinese])
罗盛健. 2006. 湿地松切根育苗及其造林对比试验. 防护林科技, (4): 22-24, 37.
(Luo S J. 2006. Comparison experiment for planting and seedling-raising of Pinus elliottii with excised roots. Protection Forest Science and Technology, (4): 22-24, 37. [in Chinese])
罗伟祥, 张文辉, 黄一钊, 等. 2009. 中国栓皮栎. 北京: 中国林业出版社.
(Luo W X, Zhang W H, Huang Y Z,et al. 2009. Quercus variabilis in China. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. [in Chinese])
田吉, 王林, 张芸香, 等. 2016. 育苗容器对一年生文冠果苗木生长和根发生的影响. 山西农业大学学报, 36 (7): 500-505.
(Tian J, Wang L, Zhang Y X,et al. 2016. Effect of seedling container on the growth and root occurrence of annual Xanthoceras sorbifolia Bunge seedlings. Journal of Shangxi Agricultural University, 36 (7): 500-505. [in Chinese])
王金旺, 卢翔, 夏海涛, 等. 2015. 容器类型和规格对容器苗生长的影响. 浙江农业科学, 56 (7): 1032-1036, 1041.
(Wang J W, Lu X, Xia H T,et al. 2015. Effect of container type and size on growth of container seedlings. Zhejiang Nongye Kexue, 56 (7): 1032-1036, 1041. [in Chinese])
王琰, 刘勇, 李国雷, 等. 2016. 容器类型及规格对油松容器苗底部渗灌耗水规律及苗木生长的影响. 林业科学, 52 (6): 10-17.
(Wang Y, Liu Y, Li G L,et al, 2016. Effects of container types and sizes on water consumption and growth of containerized Pinus tabulaeformis seedlings under sub-irrigation. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 52 (6): 10-17. [in Chinese])
郑坚, 陈秋夏, 王金旺, 等. 2016. 不同育苗容器对木荷生理生长及造林效果的影响. 西南林业大学学报, 36 (4): 53-58.
(Zheng J, Chen Q X, Wang J W,et al. 2016. The influence of different container on physical growth and afforestation effects of Schima superba container seedlings. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 36 (4): 53-58. [in Chinese])
Bonner F T. 1982. The effect of damaged radicles of presprouted red oak acorns on seedling production. Tree Planters' Notes, 33(4): 13-15.
Chapman K A, Colombo S J. 2006. Early root morphology of jack pine seedlings grown in different types of container. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 21(5): 372-379.
Chirino E, Vilagrosa A, Hernández E I,et al. 2008. Effects of a deep container on morpho-functional characteristics and root colonization in Quercus suber L. seedlings for reforestation in Mediterranean climate. Forest Ecology and Management, 256(4): 779-785.
Davis A S, Jacobs D F. 2005. Quantifying root system quality of nursery seedlings and relationship to outplanting performance. New Forest, 30: 295-311.
Devine W D, Harrington C A, Southworth D. 2009. Improving root growth and morphology of containerized Oregon white oak seedlings. Tree Planters' Notes, 53(2): 29-34.
Dominguez-Lerena S, Herrero Sierra N, Carrasco Manzano I, et al. 2006. Container characteristics influence Pinus pinea seedling development in the nursery and field. Forest Ecology and Management, 221(1/3): 63-71.
Dumroese R K, Davis A S, Jacobs D F. 2011. Nursery response of Acacia koa seedlings to container size, irrigation method, and fertilization rate. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 34: 877-887.
Ertas A. 2002. Effect of radicle clipping on sessile oak (Quercus petraea Lieb.) seedling's root surface area and number of taproots//Proceedings of the Third Balkan Scientific Conference, 2: 159-164.
Gordon W S, Jackson R B. 2000. Nutrient concentrations in fine roots. Ecology, 81(1): 275-280.
Grossnickle S C. 2005. Importance of root growth in overcoming planting stress. New Forest, 30(2/3): 273-294.
Jacobs D F, Salifu K F, Seifert J R. 2005a. Growth and nutritional response of hardwood seedlings to controlled-release fertilization at outplanting. Forest Ecology and Management, 214(1): 28-39.
Jacobs D F, Salifu K F, Seifert J R. 2005b. Relative contribution of initial root and shoot morphology in predicting field performance of hardwood seedlings. New Forests, 30(2): 235-251.
Landis T D.1990. Containers: types and functions//Landis T D, Tinus R W, McDonald S E, et al. Container tree nursery manual:volume 2. Washington, DC: USDA, Forest Service, 1-39.
Liu J J, Bloomberg M, Li G L, et al. 2016. Effects of copper root pruning and radicle pruning onfirst-season field growth and nutrient status of Chinese cork oak seedlings. New Forests, 47(5): 715-729.
Luis V C, Llorca M, Chirino E,et al. 2010. Differences in morphology, gas exchange and root hydraulic conductance before planting in Pinus canariensis seedlings growing under different fertilization and light regimes. Trees, 24(6): 1143-1150.
Mariotti B, Maltoni A, Jacobs D F,et al. 2015. Container effects on growth and biomass allocation in Quercus robur and Juglans regia seedlings. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 30(5): 401-415.
McCreary D D. 1996. The effects of stock type and radicle pruning on blue oak morphology and field performance. Annals of Forest Science, 53(2/3): 641-648.
Oliet J A, Puértolas J, Planelles R,et al. 2013. Nutrient loading of forest tree seedlings to promote stress resistance and field performance: a Mediterranean perspective. New Forests, 44(5):649-669.
Ortega U, Majada J,Mena-Petite, et al. 2006. Field performance of Pinus radiata D. Don produced in nursery with different types of containers. New Forests, 31(1): 97-112.
Poorter H, Bühler J, van Dusschoten D,et al. 2012. Pot size matters: a meta-analysis of the effects of rooting volume on plant growth. Functional Plant Biology, 39(11): 839-850.
Rune G. 2003. Slit in container wall improve root structure and stem straightness of outplanted scots pine seedlings. Silva Fennnica, 37(3): 333-342.
Tilki F, Alptekin C U. 2006. Germination and seedling growth of Quercus vulcanica: effect of srratification, desiccation, radicle pruning, and season of sowing. New Forests, 32(3): 243-251.
Tsakaldimi M, Zagas T, Tsitsoni T,et al. 2005. Root morphology, stem growth and field performance of seedlings of two Mediterranean evergreen oak species raised in different container types. Plant and Soil, 278(1/2): 85-93.
Villar-Salvador P, Puertolas J, Cuesta B, et al. 2012. Increase in size and nitrogen concentration enhances seedling survival in Mediterranean plantations:Insights from an ecophysiological conceptual model of plant survival. New Forest, 43(5/6): 755-770.
Villar-Salvador P, Uscola M, Jacobs D F. 2015. The role of stored carbohydrates and nitrogen in the growth and stress tolerance of planted forest trees. New Forests, 46(5): 813-839.
Wang J X, Li G L, Pinto J R,et al. 2015. Both nursery and field performance determine suitable nitrogen supply of nursery-grown, exponentially fertilized Chinese pine. Silva Fennica, 49(3): 1-13.

[1]	祁金玉, 宋瑞清. 褐环乳牛肝菌与绿木霉复合接种对辽西北地区樟子松根系的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(5): 62-69.
[2]	史文辉, 李国雷, 苏淑钗, 刘勇, 贾黎明, 尚治国. 子叶切除与苗圃施肥对栓皮栎容器苗造林效果的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(1): 64-73.
[3]	陈琳, 曾杰, 贾宏炎, 蒙彩兰, 黎明. 容器规格和基质配方对红锥幼苗生长及造林效果的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(3): 76-83.
[4]	刘自强, 余新晓, 贾国栋, 贾剑波, 娄源海, 张坤. 北京山区侧柏和栓皮栎的水分利用特征[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(9): 22-30.
[5]	王琰, 刘勇, 李国雷, 胡嘉伟, 娄军山, 万芳芳. 容器类型及规格对油松容器苗底部渗灌耗水规律及苗木生长的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(6): 10-17.
[6]	程中倩, 李国雷. 氮肥和容器深度对栓皮栎容器苗生长、根系结构及养分贮存的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(4): 21-29.
[7]	胡晓静, 张文辉, 何景峰. 秦岭南坡栓皮栎实生苗的构型分析[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(9): 157-164.
[8]	陈闯, 刘勇, 李国雷, 孙巧玉, 王琰, 万芳芳. 底部渗灌灌水梯度对栓皮栎容器苗生长和养分状况的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(7): 21-27.
[9]	尹艺凝, 张文辉. 栓皮栎栲胶品质与生态因子的相关分析[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(8): 30-38.
[10]	崔豫川, 张文辉, 李志萍. 干旱和复水对栓皮栎幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(7): 66-73.
[11]	徐湘婷, 王林, 黄平, 万宇轩, 李建中, 万贤崇. 风和光照对侧柏、栓皮栎生长和形态建成的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(7): 164-168.
[12]	张瑜, 贾黎明, 郑聪慧, 张西. 秦岭地区栓皮栎天然次生林地位指数表的编制[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(4): 47-54.
[13]	易青春, 张文辉, 唐德瑞. 栓皮栎伐桩萌苗保留量对其生长和生物量积累的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(7): 34-39.
[14]	白超;张文辉;雷亚芳. 秦岭北坡2种类型栓皮栎软木生长及特性[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(4): 62-69.
[15]	郑聪慧;贾黎明;段劼;魏松坡;孙操稳;贾振虎;卢福顺;王志勇;崔向东. 华北地区栓皮栎天然次生林地位指数表的编制[J]. , 2013, 49(2): 79-85.