集体林分权条件下不同经营类型商品林生产要素投入及其效率——基于三阶段DEA模型及其福建、江西农户调研数据

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20141217

林业科学 ›› 2014, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (12): 122-130.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20141217

集体林分权条件下不同经营类型商品林生产要素投入及其效率——基于三阶段DEA模型及其福建、江西农户调研数据

李桦¹, 姚顺波¹, 刘璨², 郭亚军¹

1. 西北农林科技大学经济管理学院杨凌 712100;
2. 国家林业局经济发展研究中心北京 100714

收稿日期:2014-03-06 修回日期:2014-06-10 出版日期:2014-12-25 发布日期:2015-01-08
通讯作者: 姚顺波
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目"集体林权改革背景下南方农户商品林生产要素配置效率及其提升路径研究"(71273211).

Inputs of Production Factors for Different Operational Types of Commercial Forests and the Technical Efficiency in the Reform of Collective Forestry Property Right System: Based on Three Stage DEA Model and Household Data of Fujian and Jiangxi Province

Li Hua¹, Yao Shunbo¹, Liu Can², Guo Yajun¹

1. College of Economics & Management, Northwest A&F University Yangling 712100;
2. Research Center of Economic Development of State Forestry Administration Beijing 100714

Received:2014-03-06 Revised:2014-06-10 Online:2014-12-25 Published:2015-01-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

运用三阶段DEA模型引入政策和自然因素等环境变量,采用福建、江西跟踪的林农数据对林农生产要素投入现状及其效率进行实证研究.结果表明: 林农对林地经营仍倾向粗放经营,偏好周期较短的经济林,经济林投入的劳动力、资金都高于木材、木材为主兼有竹材的经营类型,但其综合技术效率却低于木材、木材为主兼有竹材的经营类型; 林农商品生产规模效率很低,导致综合技术效率很低,在剔除环境变量和随机因素影响后, 林农商品林的纯技术效率提高35.96%,但规模效率降低34.83%,导致平均技术效率降低11.36%.环境变量影响因素中,林权证的获得、采伐指标申请难度降低以及林业税负的减轻等林权改革及配套服务措施的完善能显著提高商品林生产效率; 有劳动能力的户主年龄越大、户主受教育水平越高以及降雨量越多对生产效率有提升作用; 非农收入在总收入中所占比例越高、林地坡度越大、林地块数越多和林地距公路距离越远对生产效率有抑制作用.相关部门应结合当地自然条件引导农户木材经营由粗放转向适度集约经营,继续完善林权改革及其配套服务措施,顺应农户在林地流转不普遍的现实背景下实现林业生产过程的规模化经营,并提供有针对性的林业经营服务以及林区道路基础设施建设.

关键词: 林权制度改革, 福建, 江西, 三阶段DEA模型, 生产要素投入, 生产效率

Abstract:

The status quo about household's production factors inputs and the efficiency were analyzed with a three-stage DEA Model based on the data collected from households in Fujian and Jiangxi Province covering the period of 2007-2011. It was found that household's forestland management was still at the stage of extensive operation. The operation still preferred a shorter cycle of economic forest. The inputs of labor and funds on economic forest were higher than on wood, wood with bamboo management type. But the comprehensive technical efficiency of the economic forest management was lower than wood, wood with bamboo management mode. The scale efficiency was low, which led to low technical efficiency. After getting rid of environment variables and random factors, the pure technical efficiency rose by 35.96%, scale efficiency lowed by 34.83%, thus the average technical efficiency decreased by 11.36%. Further, improvement of the forest right reform and supporting service measures, such as reducing the difficulty of application for harvesting index, and forest right certification, and relieving taxes, was able to significantly improve the efficiency of the production of commercial forest. The older age and higher education level of the householders, and the more rainfall improved the technical efficiency; on the contrary, the higher ratio of off-farm income to total income, the more number of forest land parcel and the farther distances of forestland from roads reduced the technical efficiency. These results suggest that the suitable measure and relevant service should be improved by related government departments in order to raise the commercial forest technical efficiency and to increase farmer's income in rich forest regions.

Key words: forest tenure reform, Fujian, Jiangxi, three stage DEA model, production factor input, technical efficiency

中图分类号:

S7-94

李桦, 姚顺波, 刘璨, 郭亚军. 集体林分权条件下不同经营类型商品林生产要素投入及其效率——基于三阶段DEA模型及其福建、江西农户调研数据[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(12): 122-130.

Li Hua, Yao Shunbo, Liu Can, Guo Yajun. Inputs of Production Factors for Different Operational Types of Commercial Forests and the Technical Efficiency in the Reform of Collective Forestry Property Right System: Based on Three Stage DEA Model and Household Data of Fujian and Jiangxi Province[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(12): 122-130.

参考文献

邓波,张学军,郭军华. 基于三阶段DEA模型的区域生态效率的研究.中国软科学,(1):92-99.
(Deng B, Zhang X J, Guo J H. 2011. Research on ecological efficiency based on three-stage DEA model. China Soft Science,(1):92-99. [in Chinese] )
郭军华,倪明,李帮义.2010.基于三阶段DEA模型的农业生产效率研究.数量经济技术经济研究,(12):27-38.
(Guo J H, Ni M, Li B Y. 2010. Research on agricultural production efficiency based on three-stage DEA model. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics,(12):27-38. [in Chinese] )
郭亚军.2012.基于三阶段DEA模型的工业生产效率的研究.科研管理,(11):16-23.
(Guo Y J. 2012. Industrial production efficiency based on a three-stage DEA model. Science Research Management,(11):16-23. [in Chinese] )
贾治邦. 2009.深入贯彻中央林业工作会议精神全面推进集体林权制度改革.求是,(14):8-9.
孔凡斌. 2008.集体林权制度改革绩效评价理论与实证研究——基于江西省2484 户林农收入增长的视角.林业科学,44(10): 132-141.
(Kong F B. 2008. Theorical and empirical research of performance evaluation for the policy of collective forestry property rights system reform. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,44(10): 132-141. [in Chinese] )
孔凡斌,廖文梅. 2012.集体林分权条件下的林地细碎化程度及与农户林地投入产出的关系.林业科学, 48(4):119-126.
(Kong F B, Liao W M. 2012. Relationships between the woodland fragmentation,farmers' investment and forest productivity in the reform of collective forest property right system:an empirical analysis of 602 households survey in 8 counties of Jiangxi Province. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 48(4):119-126. [in Chinese] )
李周. 2008.林权改革的评价与思考.林业经济,(9):3-8.
(Li Z. 2008. Assessment and thinking on forestry property reformation. Forestry Economics,(9):3-8. [in Chinese] )
刘璨. 2005. 我国南方集体林区主要林业制度安排及绩效分析.管理世界,(9):79-87.
刘珉. 2011.集体林权制度改革:农户种植意愿研究.管理世界,(5):93-98.
(Liu M. 2011. The reform of the system of the collective right of forestry: a study on farmers' willingness in planting. Management World,(5):93-98. [in Chinese] )
宋长鸣,向玉林. 2012.林业技术效率及其影响因素研究.林业经济,(2):66-70.
(Song C M, Xiang Y L. 2012. Study of forestry industry’s technical efficiency and its influencing factor: based on stochastic frontier production function model. Forestry Economics,(2):66-70. [in Chinese] )
苏时鹏,马梅芸,林群. 2012.集体林权制度改革后农户林业全要素生产率变动.林业科学, 48(6):127-135.
(Su S P, Ma M Y, Lin Q. 2012. Farmer forestry total factor productivity changes after the collective forestry property rights system reform: based on households surveys in Fujian Province. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 48(6):127-135. [in Chinese] )
田杰,姚顺波. 2013.中国林业生产的技术效率测算与分析.中国人口 ·资源与环境,23(11):66-72.
(Tian J, Yao S B. 2013. Research on technical efficiency of forestry production in China. China Population Resources and Environment,23(11):66-72. [in Chinese] )
魏远竹. 2000.资金投入: 林业经济增长方式转变的第一启动力.林业财务与会计,(5):9-10.
徐秀英,石道金,杨松坤,等. 2010.农户林地流转行为及影响因素分析——基于浙江省临安、安吉的农户调查.林业科学,46(9):149-157.
(Xu X Y, Shi D J, Yang S K, et al. 2010. Analysis on forestland transferring and the affecting factors:a case study in Lin'an and Anji county in Zhejiang Province. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,46(9):149-157. [in Chinese] )
姚晓红,许彦平,陈晶. 2005.近30年气候变化对小陇山林业资源的影响研究.干旱地区农业研究,23(9):242-249.
(Yao X H, Xu Y P, Chen J. 2005. A study on the forest resource affected by climate changing in last 30 years in Xiaolong mountain. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas,23(9):242-249. [in Chinese] )
Fried H O, Lovell C A K, Schmidt S S, et al.2002. Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopment analysis. Journal o f Productivity Analysis, 17(1/2):157-174.
Label G, Stuart W B.1998.Technical efficiency evaluation on logging contractors using a non parametric model.Inter Journal of Forest Engineering, 9(2):15-24.
Viitala E, Hänninen H. 1998. Measuring the efficiency of public forestry organization. Forest Science, 44(3):298-307.

[1]	洪燕真, 冯亮明. 木本粮油补贴政策实际效果分析及其经济学解释[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(8): 113-119.
[2]	程松林, 毛夷仙, 胡尔夷, 雷平, 袁荣斌, 邹思成. 江西武夷山自然保护区黄腹角雉种群生物学及海拔分布特征[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(10): 160-167.
[3]	赵静, 李婷婷, 申津羽, 温亚利. 集体林权制度改革绩效评价及其对林农森林经营意愿影响分析——基于福建省永安市的农户调查数据[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(6): 138-146.
[4]	王小军, 谢屹, 王立群, 温亚利. 集体林权制度改革中的农户森林经营行为与影响因素——以福建省邵武市和尤溪县为例[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(6): 135-142.
[5]	曾祥谓;王昌海. 江西省森林社会效益核算[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(6): 112-117.
[6]	苏时鹏;马梅芸;林群. 集体林权制度改革后农户林业全要素生产率的变动——基于福建农户的跟踪调查[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(6): 127-135.
[7]	孔凡斌;廖文梅. 集体林分权条件下的林地细碎化程度及与农户林地投入产出的关系——基于江西省8县602户农户调查数据的分析[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(4): 119-126.
[8]	黄金水;汤陈生;陈金渭;康文通;何学友;杨希;. 厦门市松材线虫病的持续控制技术[J]. 林业科学, 2010, 46(10): 83-88.
[9]	孔凡斌;. 集体林权制度改革对林区县乡财政性收入影响评价——基于江西省赣州市的调查[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 12(9): 120-129.
[10]	王文烂. 集体林权制度改革对农民林业收入的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 12(8): 141-146.
[11]	朱洪革.. 国有林权制度改革后承包户投资行为及其影响因素分析*[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 12(4): 117-123.
[12]	谢屹;温亚利;公培臣. 集体林权制度改革中农户流转收益合理性分析*——以江西省遂川县为例[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 12(10): 134-140.
[13]	张鼎华涂传进沈乒松刘桂林. 福建山地几种主要土类土壤磷的研究*[J]. 林业科学, 2008, 44(8): 29-36.
[14]	吕杰黄利. 辽宁省集体林权制度改革与林业产业发展的现状[J]. 林业科学, 2008, 44(8): 112-117.
[15]	张敏新肖平张红霄. “均山”：集体林权制度改革的现实选择[J]. 林业科学, 2008, 44(8): 131-136.

集体林分权条件下不同经营类型商品林生产要素投入及其效率——基于三阶段DEA模型及其福建、江西农户调研数据

Inputs of Production Factors for Different Operational Types of Commercial Forests and the Technical Efficiency in the Reform of Collective Forestry Property Right System: Based on Three Stage DEA Model and Household Data of Fujian and Jiangxi Province

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者中心

期刊获奖

引证指标

联系方式