The objectives of our article were to discuss the effects on water status and growth after Ginkgo had been transplanted and cultivated in the container and in the plantinghole for two years by measuring the growth of new root, shoot and leaf, microstructure of tracheid and pit, sapflow velocity, embolism vulnerability curve, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate and water potential. The results indicated the container planting Ginkgo had more rootlet than that the holeplantingGinkgo did while, by contrast, the holeplantingGinkgo had more thick root. The root length density of fine root and rootlet with container planting was about 6.12 times more than the hole planting. The length of shoot, the diameter of shoot and the area of leaf of containerplantingGinkgo were respectively 51.2%, 34.6%, and 33.0% more than the holeplantingGinkgo, and the difference of them was significant. The results also indicated the tracheid of containerplantingGinkgo was wider and shorter than that of holeplantingGinkgo. The pit of containerplantingGinkgo was an approximate round while that of holeplantingGinkgo was ellipse. As compared with holeplantingGinkgo, during the daytime the containerplantingGinkgo had significantly higher the sapflow velocity, the stomatal conductance, the transpiration rate and the water potential, and lower embolism vulnerability. Moreover, the root system would keep intact if being transplanted again. So, the container planting was a better planting mode of big standards mature tree cultivation.