覆盖经营对毛竹林鞭笋品质及其时序变化的影响

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20240828

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective: This study investigated the temporal variations of appearance, nutrition and taste quality of rhizome shoots at different harvest periods of time in mulched and no-mulched moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) forests, and comprehensively analyzed the effects of management measures on the quality of bamboo shoots, aiming at providing reference for the cultivation of high quality rhizome shoots. Method: The mulched and no-mulched moso bamboo forests in Changxing County, Zhejiang Province were taken as the research object. Rhizome shoots were harvested in May, July and September to determine their appearance, nutritional substances, flavor substances, and amino acid contents of rhizome shoots. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the difference significance of the indicators, and the least significant difference (LSD) was applied for multiple comparisons. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to calculate the comprehensive index of rhizome shoot quality under different management measures, and the comprehensive evaluation was conducted. Result: The basal diameter, length, mass and edible rate of rhizome shoots increased first and then decreased, and they were all higher in mulched moso bamboo forest than those in no-mulched moso bamboo forest. Contents of starch, fat, soluble sugar, protein, and vitamin C increased first and then decreased, while the content of total amino acids gradually increased. In addition, contents of starch, fat, soluble sugar, protein, and vitamin C in mulched moso bamboo forest were significantly higher than those in no-mulched moso bamboo forest at the three harvest times. Contents of cellulose, oxalic acid, tannin, total flavonoids, and total acids decreased first and then increased, while the content of lignin gradually increased. The ratio of sugar to acid increased first and then decreased. The contents of cellulose, oxalic acid, tannin, total flavonoids, and total acids in mulched moso bamboo forest were significantly lower than those in no-mulched moso bamboo forest at the three harvest periods, while the ratio of sugar to acid was significantly higher in mulched moso bamboo forest than that in no-mulched moso bamboo forest. Contents and proportions of bitter amino acids and aromatic amino acids gradually decreased, while the content and proportion of sweet amino acids gradually increased. Contents and proportions of umami amino acids, sweet amino acids, and aromatic amino acids in mulched moso bamboo forest were significantly higher than those in no-mulched bamboo forest, while the content and proportion of bitter amino acids in mulched moso bamboo forest were significantly lower than those in no-mulched bamboo forest. The comprehensive evaluation of rhizome shoot quality showed that mulching management significantly improved the comprehensive index of rhizome shoot quality, and it was significantly higher in July than in May and September. Conclusion: There are significant temporal changes in the appearance, nutrition, and taste quality of rhizome shoots, and it is the best in July. Moreover, mulching management is beneficial for improving the appearance and nutritional contents of rhizome shoots, enhancing their flavor and sweet taste, reducing astringency and roughness, and significantly improving the quality and palatability of rhizome shoots.

Key words: Phyllostachys edulis, mulching management, rhizome shoot, appearance quality, nutritional quality, eating quality

CLC Number:

S795

Zhenya Yang,Huijing Ni,Ying Li,Bo Wang,Jiancheng Zhao. Effects of Mulching Management on the Quality and Temporal Variation of Rhizome Shoots in Moso Bamboo Forests[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(12): 106-114.

Figures/Tables 8

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Principal component factor load matrix, common factor variance, and weights for quality indicators of rhizome shoot"

指标 Index	主成分 Principal component					公因子方差 σ² of common factor	权重 Weight
指标 Index	1	2	3	4	5	公因子方差 σ² of common factor	权重 Weight
基径 Basal diameter	0.092 8	0.138 8	0.703 8	0.234 3	0.060 5	0.581 8	0.116 3
长度 Length	0.226 5	0.033 6	0.084 1	?0.234 6	?0.258 7	0.181 5	0.036 3
质量 Mass	0.198 0	?0.115 8	0.381 7	0.123 7	?0.100 8	0.223 8	0.044 8
可食率 Edible portion	0.218 9	0.119 6	0.217 0	0.231 9	0.107 6	0.174 7	0.034 9
淀粉 Starch	0.236 3	0.032 0	?0.060 6	?0.009 9	?0.279 3	0.138 6	0.027 7
脂肪 Fat	?0.205 7	0.154 8	0.028 9	0.365 9	0.208 5	0.244 5	0.048 9
可溶性糖 Soluble sugar	0.215 7	0.223 7	?0.123 1	?0.006 0	?0.325 2	0.217 5	0.043 5
蛋白质 Protein	0.246 2	0.070 8	?0.005 1	?0.015 9	0.204 1	0.107 6	0.021 5
维生素C Vitamin C	0.244 5	0.081 4	0.100 0	?0.091 8	0.018 3	0.085 2	0.017 0
纤维素 Cellulose	0.240 8	0.221 0	0.019 8	?0.184 9	0.133 9	0.159 3	0.031 9
木质素 Lignose	0.220 9	0.181 5	?0.308 3	0.205 1	0.188 6	0.254 4	0.050 9
草酸 Oxalic acid	0.236 5	0.080 6	?0.069 5	0.108 8	0.388 8	0.230 3	0.046 1
单宁 Tannin	0.213 2	0.323 2	0.033 6	?0.176 5	0.344 8	0.301 1	0.060 2
总黄酮 Total flavone	0.260 9	?0.042 3	?0.059 4	?0.025 5	?0.003 3	0.074 0	0.014 8
总酸 Total acid	0.232 2	0.084 5	?0.013 0	0.007 5	?0.275 8	0.137 3	0.027 5
糖酸比 Ratio of sugar to acid	0.243 2	0.173 7	?0.075 5	0.027 3	?0.351 5	0.219 3	0.043 9
总氨基酸 Total amino acid	0.163 2	?0.468 1	0.163 0	?0.372 4	0.141 1	0.430 9	0.086 2
鲜味氨基酸 Umami amino acid	0.193 4	?0.430 8	0.075 0	0.167 1	?0.014 5	0.256 7	0.051 3
甜味氨基酸 Sweet amino acid	0.212 7	?0.398 4	?0.033 9	0.020 5	0.120 4	0.220 0	0.044 0
苦味氨基酸 Bitter amino acid	0.183 8	?0.231 6	?0.223 7	0.619 7	?0.119 2	0.535 7	0.107 1
芳香味氨基酸 Aromatic amino acid	0.235 7	?0.127 8	?0.284 6	?0.080 8	0.257 9	0.225 9	0.045 2
特征值 Eigenvalue	13.61	1.72	1.36	0.76	0.62	—	—
贡献率 Proportion (%)	64.82	8.23	6.49	3.64	2.96	—	—
累积贡献率 Cumulative proportion (%)	64.82	73.04	79.53	83.17	86.13	—	—

Table 7

Fig.1

References 0

	陈双林. 毛竹林地覆盖竹笋早出技术应用的问题思考. 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28 (5): 799- 804.
	Chen S L. Thoughts on related problems of mulched technique with organic materials in moso bamboo forest for early shooting. Journal of Zhejiang A& F University, 2011, 28 (5): 799- 804.
	郭子武, 江志标, 陈双林, 等. 覆土栽培对高节竹笋品质的影响. 广西植物, 2015a, 35 (4): 515- 519.
	Guo Z W, Jiang Z B, Chen S L, et al. Influence of soil covered cultivation on shoot quality of Phyllostachys prominens. Guihaia, 2015a, 35 (4): 515- 519.
	郭子武, 江志标, 陈双林, 等. 高节竹与毛竹鞭笋品质和适口性比较. 林业科学研究, 2015b, 8 (3): 447- 450.
	Guo Z W, Jiang Z B, Chen S L, et al. Comparative study on quality and palatability of rhizome shoot of Phyllostachys prominens and Phyllostachys edulis. Forest Research, 2015b, 8 (3): 447- 450.
	江泽慧. 2002. 世界竹藤. 沈阳: 辽宁科学技术出版社.
	Jiang Z H. 2002. Bamboo and rattan in the world. Shenyang: Liaoning Science and Technology Press. ［in Chinese］
	李建伟, 覃万玲, 辉朝茂, 等. 甜龙竹笋品质的地理变异及其与立地环境的关系. 林业科学, 2024, 60 (11): 75- 83.
	Li J W, Qin W L, Hui C M, et al. Geographical variation in quality of Dendrocalamus brandisii bamboo shoots and its relationship with the site conditions. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2024, 60 (11): 75- 83.
	李　婷. 2016. 覆盖对毛竹林土壤理化性质和竹笋质量的影响. 成都: 四川农业大学.
	Li T. 2016. Effects of mulching on soil physicochemistry properties and quality of bamboo shoots in Phyllostachys heterocycla stand. Chengdu: Sichuan Agricultural University. ［in Chinese］
	李雪蕾, 丁兴萃, 张闪闪, 等. 不同光强下麻竹笋不同部位苦涩味物质含量的变化. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39 (3): 161- 166.
	Li X L, Ding X C, Zhang S S, et al. The distributions of bitter and astringent taste compounds in the bamboo shoot of Dendrocalamus latiflorus under different light intensities. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2015, 39 (3): 161- 166.
	毛达民, 陆媛媛, 郑林水, 等. 鞭笋挖掘后毛竹竹鞭的生长规律. 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28 (5): 833- 836.
	Mao D M, Lu Y Y, Zheng L S, et al. Growth of bamboo running rhizomes after digging up bamboo rhizome shoots. Journal of Zhejiang A& F University, 2011, 28 (5): 833- 836.
	毛海波, 钟子龙, 余水生, 等. 提早采挖鞭笋对毛竹林生产和生长的影响. 浙江林业科技, 2016, 36 (5): 31- 35.
	Mao H B, Zhong Z L, Yu S S, et al. Effect of harvesting rhizome shoot on Phyllostachys heterocycla cv. pubescens growth. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2016, 36 (5): 31- 35.
	莫润宏, 王富民, 倪张林, 等. 离子排斥色谱-双检测器法同时测定果蔬中的糖、有机酸和维生素C. 现代食品科技, 2016, 32 (4): 277- 282.
	Mo R H, Wang F M, Ni Z L, et al. Simultaneous determination of sugar, organic acids, and vitamin C in agricultural products by ion-exclusion chromatography with refractive index and diode array detectors. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2016, 32 (4): 277- 282.
	莫月雯. 2014. 毛竹笋用林覆盖技术研究. 杭州: 浙江大学.
	Mo Y W. 2014. Moso bamboo shoot forest coverage for technology research. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University. ［in Chinese］
	倪惠菁, 赵建诚, 仲建平, 等. 蚕沙有机肥对雷竹笋产量和品质的影响. 浙江林业科技, 2024, 44 (5): 81- 86.
	Ni H J, Zhao J C, Zhong J P, et al. Effects of silkworm excrement organic fertilizer on the yield and quality of Phyllostachys violascens ‘Prevernalis’ shoots. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2024, 44 (5): 81- 86.
	裘鑫灿, 叶祖英, 黄望华, 等. 不同垦复措施对毛竹鞭笋产量的影响. 竹子学报, 2020, 39 (2): 11- 14.
	Qiu X C, Ye Z Y, Huang W H, et al. Effects of reclamation on the yield of Phyllostachys edulis rhizome shoots. Journal of Bamboo Research, 2020, 39 (2): 11- 14.
	时俊帅, 陈双林, 郭子武, 等. 3个海拔梯度对高节竹笋品质的影响. 林业科学研究, 2018, 31 (4): 113- 117.
	Shi J S, Chen S L, Guo Z W, et al. Influence of altitudes on quality of Phyllostachys prominens shoot. Forest Research, 2018, 31 (4): 113- 117.
	唐隆校, 周智峰, 潘建华. 林地覆盖对毛竹鞭笋生长的影响. 浙江林业科技, 2015, 35 (4): 81- 84.
	Tang L X, Zhou Z F, Pan J H. Effect of mulching on rhizome shoot growth of Phyllostachys heterocycla cv. pubescens stand. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2015, 35 (4): 81- 84.
	童　龙, 张　磊, 李　彬, 等. 覆土栽培对绿竹笋品质与适口性的影响. 江西农业大学学报, 2018, 40 (3): 487- 493.
	Tong L, Zhang L, Li B, et al. Influence of soil-covered cultivation on quality and palatability of Dendrocalamopsis oldhami shoot. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2018, 40 (3): 487- 493.
	王　波, 李　琴, 朱　炜, 等. 毛竹林覆盖经营对土壤养分含量、酶活性及微生物生物量的影响. 林业科学, 2019, 55 (1): 110- 118.
	Wang B, Li Q, Zhu W, et al. Effects of mulching management on nutrient contents, enzyme activities, and microbial biomass in the soils of moso bamboo forests. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55 (1): 110- 118.
	王晓娟, 马光良, 陈　洪, 等. 不同覆盖措施对梁山慈竹出笋和竹笋适口性的影响. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46 (2): 143- 149.
	Wang X J, Ma G L, Chen H, et al. Effects of different mulching measures on bamboo shooting and palatability of Dendrocalamus farinosus. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2022, 46 (2): 143- 149.
	徐　森, 杨丽婷, 陈双林, 等. 竹笋适口性形成及其主要影响因素研究综述. 浙江农林大学学报, 2021, 38 (2): 403- 411.
	Xu S, Yang L T, Chen S L, et al. Review on the formation of bamboo shoot palatability and its main influencing factors. Journal of Zhejiang A& F University, 2021, 38 (2): 403- 411.
	章志远, 丁兴萃, 崔逢欣, 等. 避光对麻竹笋苦涩味及单宁含量、形态与分布的影响. 林业科学研究, 2016, 29 (5): 770- 777.
	Zhang Z Y, Ding X C, Cui F X, et al. Impact of avoiding light on bitterness and astringency, tannin content, morphology and distribution of Dendrocalamus latiflorus. Forest Research, 2016, 29 (5): 770- 777.
	赵建诚, 倪惠菁, 杨振亚, 等. 覆盖物移除时间对毛竹鞭笋产量及品质的影响. 东北林业大学学报, 2025, 53 (8): 61- 68.
	Zhao J C, Ni H J, Yang Z Y, et al. Effect of mulch removal time on rhizome shoot yield and quality of Phyllostachy edulis. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2025, 53 (8): 61- 68.
	钟子龙, 朱文强, 吴礼栋. 腊月下旬撤除覆盖物对毛竹林产量和生长的影响. 东北林业大学学报, 2016, 44 (6): 7- 10.
	Zhong Z L, Zhu W Q, Wu L D. Effect of removing the mulch in mid and late December on Phyllostachys heterocycla cv. pubescens yield and growth. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2016, 44 (6): 7- 10.
	Acharya B, Behera A, Sahu P K, et al. Bamboo shoots: an exploration into its culinary heritage in India and its nutraceutical potential. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 2023, 10 (1): 22. doi: 10.1186/s42779-023-00190-7
	Chongtham N, Bisht M S, Premlata T, et al. Quality improvement of bamboo shoots by removal of antinutrients using different processing techniques: a review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2022, 59 (1): 1- 11. doi: 10.1007/s13197-021-04987-9
	Chongtham N, Bisht M S, Santosh O, et al. Mineral elements in bamboo shoots and potential role in food fortification. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2021, 95, 103662. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2020.103662
	Gamuyao R, Nagai K, Ayano M, et al. Hormone distribution and transcriptome profiles in bamboo shoots provide insights on bamboo stem emergence and growth. Plant and Cell Physiology, 2017, 58 (4): 702- 716. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcx023
	Li X L, Xing Y G, Shui Y R, et al. Quality of bamboo shoots during storage as affected by high hydrostatic pressure processing. International Journal of Food Properties, 2021, 24 (1): 656- 676. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2021.1914084
	Pokhariya P, Tangariya P, Sahoo A, et al. Reducing hydrocyanic acid content, nutritional and sensory quality evaluation of edible bamboo shoot based food products. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 2018, 6 (4): 1079- 1084.
	Wang Y L, Chen J, Wang D M, et al. A systematic review on the composition, storage, processing of bamboo shoots: focusing the nutritional and functional benefits. Journal of Functional Foods, 2020, 71, 104015. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2020.104015
	Wu W J, Hu J, Gao H Y, et al. The potential cholesterol-lowering and prebiotic effects of bamboo shoot dietary fibers and their structural characteristics. Food Chemistry, 2020, 332, 127372. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127372
	Zhao J C, Cai C J. Physiological integration improves nitrogen use efficiency of moso bamboo: an isotopic (¹⁵N) assessment. Forest Ecology and Management, 2023, 542, 121073. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121073
	Zhao J C, Wang B, Li Q, et al. Analysis of soil degradation causes in Phyllostachys edulis forests with different mulching years. Forests, 2018, 9 (3): 149. doi: 10.3390/f9030149

处理 Treatment	密度 Density/ (tree·hm^–2)	平均胸径 Mean DBH /cm	平均高 Mean height /m	年龄结构 Age structure (Ⅰ︰Ⅱ︰Ⅲ)
不覆盖No-mulching	2 475±143 a	10.69±0.50 a	14.65±0.85 a	0.40︰0.39︰0.21
覆盖Mulching	2 436±122 a	10.80±0.36 a	14.86±0.68 a	0.39︰0.38︰0.23

处理 Treatment	取样时间 Sampling time	基径 Basal diameter/cm	长度 Length/cm	质量 Mass/g	可食率 Edible portion (%)
不覆盖 No-mulching	2024?05	2.05±0.13Ba	26.94±1.76Aa	144.27±5.17Ba	18.21±1.15Bb
	2024?07	2.33±0.11Aa	28.42±2.26Ab	160.36±5.07Ab	21.99±1.17Ab
	2024?09	2.06±0.11Ba	25.72±1.44Ab	148.82±5.26Ba	17.09±1.24Bb
覆盖 Mulching	2024?05	2.10±0.21Aa	30.11±2.17Ba	154.84±7.92Ba	21.04±1.52Ba
	2024?07	2.44±0.21Aa	34.16±1.22Aa	176.58±9.96Aa	24.84±1.67Aa
	2024?09	2.14±0.22Aa	29.17±1.51Ba	159.00±7.15Ba	21.51±1.57Ba

处理 Treatment	取样时间 Sampling time	淀粉 Starch/ (mg·g^–1)	脂肪 Fat/ (mg·g^–1)	可溶性糖 Soluble sugar/ (mg·g^–1)	蛋白质 Protein/ (mg·g^–1)	维生素C Vitamin C/ (μg·g^–1)	总氨基酸 Total amino acid/ (mg·g^–1)
不覆盖 No-mulching	2024?05	13.28±0.57Ab	17.38±0.99ABb	14.53±0.95Ab	19.25±0.56Bb	58.55±1.35ABb	2.06±0.09Aa
	2024?07	14.37±0.47Ab	18.55±0.73Ab	14.95±1.01Ab	20.48±0.48Ab	60.53±0.93Ab	2.12±0.10Aa
	2024?09	13.13±0.99Ab	16.77±1.00Bb	12.82±0.62Bb	19.17±0.65Bb	57.82±1.01Bb	2.16±0.06Ab
覆盖 Mulching	2024?05	16.13±1.28Aa	20.57±2.49Aa	16.68±0.91Aa	22.17±0.83ABa	62.87±1.43Ba	2.20±0.11Aa
	2024?07	17.03±0.88Aa	21.22±2.55Aa	17.37±1.24Aa	22.88±0.75Aa	65.88±1.51Aa	2.26±0.09Aa
	2024?09	15.07±0.99Aa	20.87±1.66Aa	14.68±0.83Ba	21.38±0.74Ba	62.23±1.66Ba	2.30±0.05Aa

处理 Treatment	取样时间 Sampling time	纤维素 Cellulose/ (mg·g^–1)	木质素 Lignose/ (mg·g^–1)	草酸 Oxalic acid/ (mg·g^–1)	单宁 Tannin/ (mg·g^–1)	总黄酮 Total flavone/ (mg·g^–1)	总酸 Total acid/ (mg·g^–1)	糖酸比 Ratio of sugar to acid
不覆盖 No-mulching	2024?05	227.42±9.09Ba	114.68±6.56Aa	2.91±0.10Aa	2.62±0.08Aa	46.88±1.78Aa	1.82±0.12Aa	8.00±0.77ABb
	2024?07	211.65±8.80Ca	116.37±7.42Aa	2.72±0.08Ba	2.47±0.04Ba	41.15±2.06Ba	1.63±0.06Ba	9.15±0.43Ab
	2024?09	243.02±5.12Aa	125.97±7.06Aa	2.94±0.12Aa	2.66±0.06Aa	47.15±1.74Aa	1.77±0.08Aa	7.26±0.27Bb
覆盖 Mulching	2024?05	184.67±7.71Bb	92.73±6.00Bb	2.50±0.11Ab	2.36±0.08Bb	32.57±1.19ABb	1.43±0.09ABb	11.72±0.79Aa
	2024?07	183.17±7.03Bb	94.68±6.46Bb	2.49±0.10Ab	2.34±0.08Bb	31.03±1.10Bb	1.35±0.10Bb	12.95±1.23Aa
	2024?09	212.67±10.19Ab	107.35±5.80Ab	2.63±0.12Ab	2.54±0.07Aa	34.72±1.77Ab	1.57±0.10Ab	9.39±1.02Ba

处理 Treatment	取样时间 Sampling time	苦味氨基酸 Bitter amino acid	鲜味氨基酸 Delicious amino acid	甜味氨基酸 Sweet amino acid	芳香味氨基酸 Aromatic amino acid
不覆盖 No-mulching	2024?05	1.01±0.07Aa	0.19±0.01Ab	0.47±0.05Ab	0.31±0.02Ab
	2024?07	1.00±0.04Aa	0.20±0.01Ab	0.49±0.05Ab	0.30±0.02Ab
	2024?09	0.98±0.03Aa	0.19±0.01Ab	0.51±0.03Ab	0.28±0.02Ab
覆盖 Mulching	2024?05	0.89±0.07Ab	0.22±0.01Ba	0.60±0.04Aa	0.42±0.01Aa
	2024?07	0.88±0.04Ab	0.25±0.01ABa	0.62±0.04Aa	0.40±0.02ABa
	2024?09	0.86±0.02Ab	0.28±0.02Aa	0.65±0.03Aa	0.39±0.01Ba

Effects of Mulching Management on the Quality and Temporal Variation of Rhizome Shoots in Moso Bamboo Forests

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 0

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Rui Gu,Shaohui Fan,Songpo Wei,Guanglu Liu. Construction of a Core Germplasm of Moso Bamboo Based on Phenotypic Traits [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(9): 101-112.
[2]	Jiangfei Wang,Hui Li,Chenglei Zhu,Xiaolin Di,Ying Li,Qingnan Wang,Huiru Wan,Huayu Sun,Zhimin Gao. Functions of PeBAM3 of Moso Bamboo Involved in Leaf Starch Degradation [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(8): 231-240.
[3]	Xiaoling Yan,Qin Hao,Zi Shen,Yujia Zhang,Xiaoqin Guo. Expression, Protein Interaction and Biological Function Analysis of PheFT1 Gene in Moso Bamboo [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(4): 140-152.
[4]	Xinxin Ma,You Wang,Jiajun Wang,Long Feng,Jianfeng Ma. Changes in Ash Composition of Bamboo during Pyrolysis and the Distribution Pattern of Silicon Transformation [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(2): 172-179.
[5]	Hui Li,Qingnan Wang,Chenglei Zhu,Huayu Sun,Xiaolin Di,Zhimin Gao. Identification and Function of Rubisco Activase Gene Family in Three Bamboo Species [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(11): 35-44.
[6]	Ao Zhang,Wenting Li,Tianxiang Wang,Yaoxing Wu,Gang Lei,Lianghua Qi. Regional Differentiation and It’s Influencing Factors of Soil Easily-oxidized Organic Carbon in Subtropical Phyllostachys edulis Forests [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2024, 60(6): 1-12.
[7]	Yi Wang,Junwei Luan,Chen Chen,Shirong Liu. Asymmetric Response of Soil Respiration and Its Components to Nitrogen and Phosphorus Addition in Phyllostachys edulis Forest [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(7): 54-64.
[8]	Jinling Yuan,Jinjun Yue,Jingxia Ma,Lei Yu,Lei Liu. Culm Form Characteristics of Phyllostachys edulis ‘Yuanbao’ [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(5): 71-80.
[9]	Wei Zhang,Yuyou He,Ziwu Guo,Sheping Wang,Shuanglin Chen. Characteristics of Arbor Species Community Structure and Diversity in the Succession of Out-of-Management Phyllostachys edulis Forest [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(12): 12-20.
[10]	Jiamin Xie,Mingbing Zhou. Identification and Bioinformatics Analysis of Mariner-Like Element Autonomous Transposons in Phyllostachys edulis [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(1): 175-184.
[11]	Wenjie Hu,Hongdong Pang,Xingyi Hu,Faxin Huang,Jiawei Yang,Lijun Xu,Miao Gong. Effects of Bamboo Forest Density and Fertilizer Types on the Yield and Quality of Phyllostachys edulis Bamboo Shoots and Soil Physicochemical Properties in Mufu Mountain Area [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(12): 32-42.
[12]	Chenglei Zhu,Kebin Yang,Xiurong Xu,Shuang Ma,Xiaopei Li,Zhimin Gao. Molecular Characteristics of NIP Genes in Phyllostachys edulis and Their Expression Patterns in Response to Stresses [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(1): 64-76.
[13]	Linxin Fang,Shouke Zhang,Kefeng Jia,Bihuan Ye,Wei Zhang,Jinping Shu,Haojie Wang,Tiansen Xu. Oviposition Preference of Eutomostethus deqingensis (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) on Phyllostachys edulis [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(1): 131-139.
[14]	Chenglei Zhu,Caili Li,Xiaopei Li,Jingjing Shi,Zhimin Gao. Molecular Characteristics of Tubulins and Preliminary Function Analysis of PeTUA3 in Phyllostachys edulis [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(7): 44-54.
[15]	Qianyong Shen,Mengping Tang. Stem Volume Models of Phyllostachys edulis in Zhejiang Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(5): 89-96.