城市森林公园生态系统文化服务的公众偏好与感知

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20240414

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective: To quantify public perception and preference towards the cultural ecosystem services of urban forest parks in Nanjing using online review data from social media platforms and field survey data. This will aid in enhancing public satisfaction and precise management, and facilitate the optimization and sustainable management of urban forest park ecological spaces. Method: Within typical forest parks in Nanjing, field research, social media data analysis, and natural language processing techniques were employed. Based on the “importance-satisfaction” analysis model, the public’s perception, preferences, and impacts on cultural ecosystem services were quantified. Result: 1) The public highly recognizes aesthetic appreciation and leisure recreation services but has lower satisfaction with emotional connection, inspiration acquisition, and cultural heritage services. There is a mismatch between supply and demand among these services, indicating an urgent need to enhance services catering to the public’s spiritual and emotional needs. 2) Younger individuals prefer educational and cognitive services and leisure recreation, while older individuals favor health promotion and emotional connection services. Men prefer leisure recreation and health promotion services, whereas women are more inclined towards aesthetic appreciation, educational and cognitive services, and emotional connection services. 3) Accessibility and usage frequency enhance social interaction, emotional connection, and health promotion services, highlighting the importance of improving accessibility within forest parks. 4) Different occupational groups have their unique needs and preferences for cultural ecosystem services, which can be leveraged by smart landscape systems to enhance service experiences and motivate public participation in park management and development. Conclusion: Visitors of different ages, genders, accessibility levels, usage frequencies, and occupational backgrounds exhibit significant differences in their preferences for cultural ecosystem services. Park management should adopt differentiated service strategies encompassing policy support, personalized services, technology integration, and community participation. These strategies will provide robust support for the scientific management and ecological space planning of urban forest park.

Key words: cultural ecosystem services, perception, satisfaction, forest park, service function

CLC Number:

S718.55
Q148

Xiaohang Bai,Jieping Chen. Public Preference and Perception for Cultural Ecosystem Services of Urban Forest Parks[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(6): 99-108.

Figures/Tables 6

Table 1

Basic information of the interviewees"

项目Item	类别（比例） Category（proportion）
性别 Gender（male， female）	男Male（0.486 7）；女Female（0.513 3）

年龄Age/a	<16（0.14）；16?25（0.16）；26?35（0.19）；36?45（0.19）；46?60（0.15）；>60（0.17）

在南京居住时间Residence time in Nanjing/a	<1（0.03）；1?15（0.17）；16?25（0.22）；26?35（0.30）；>35（0.28）

学历 Education background	没受教育No education（0）；小学Primary school（0.04）；初中Junior high school（0.18）；高中High school（0.19）；本科Undergraduate（0.53）；硕士Master（0.05）；博士Doctor（0.01）

职业 Occupation	国家机关、党群组织、企业、事业单位工作人员Staff of state organs， party?mass organizations， enterprises， and institutions（0.07）；工业相关专业技术人员Technicians with industrial?related professional background（0.32）；农林牧渔水利业生产人员Production personnel in the agricultural， forestry， animal husbandry， fishery and water conservancy industry（0.06）；商业、服务人员Business and service personnel（0.05）；军人Soldiers（0.01）；学生Student（0.29）；退休人员Retired persons（0.17）；其他从业人员Other practitioners（0.03）

森林公园使用频次 Frequency of using forest parks/（time·a^?1）	0（0.02）；1?3（0.52）；4?6（0.30）；7?12（0.14）；12?24（0.02）；>24（0.0）

前往公园的主要目的 Main purpose of visiting parks	欣赏美景Admire the beautiful scenery（0.22）；精神放松、寻找灵感Relax and find inspiration（0.13）；学习科普、自然教育Learning science popularization and nature education（0.08）；健身、休闲、娱乐Fitness and leisure， entertainment（0.37）；看历史建筑、体验当地文化Visit historical buildings and experience local culture（0.06）；增进交流Enhance communication（0.14）

在游览过程中对森林公园的总体环境感知 Overall environmental perception of forest parks during the tour	非常不满意Very dissatisfied（0.08）；不满意Dissatisfied（0.21）；满意Satisfied（0.43）；非常满意Very satisfied（0.28）

文化服务感知要素 Perception factors of cultural ecosystem services	自然景观吸引力Natural landscape attraction；生态导览和解说服务Ecological tour guide and interpretation services；自然生态教育资源Natural ecological education resources；文化遗产保护和展示Cultural heritage protection and display；社区参与和社交互动Community participation and social interaction；健康和康复功能Health and rehabilitation functions；生态保护和可持续发展Ecological protection and sustainable development；文化艺术体验Cultural and artistic experience

文化服务评价指标 Evaluation indicators for cultural ecosystem services	美学欣赏服务Aesthetic appreciation services；休闲游憩服务Leisure and recreation services；灵感获取服务Inspiration acquisition services；文化遗产传承服务Cultural heritage inheritance services；社会交流服务Social interaction services；教育和认知服务Education and cognitive services；情感连接服务Emotional connection services；健康促进服务Health promotion services

调查问卷数量 Number of survey questionnaires	40；40；50；50；50；50；50；60；50；50

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

References 0

	何加林, 汤　青, 李　立, 等. 2022. 城市公园绿地格局与休闲潜力间的关系——以北京奥林匹克森林公园为例. 生态学杂志, 41(12): 2424−2431.
	He J L, Tang Q, Li L, et al. 2022. Landscape pattern and the recreation potential of urban parks: the case of Beijing Olympic forest park. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 41(12): 2424−2431. ［in Chinese］
	雷相东. 森林生态系统服务多功能性: 概念、指标和经营模拟模型. 北京林业大学学报, 2024, 46 (5): 1- 11. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230327
	Lei X D. Forest ecosystem service multi-functionality: definitions, indicators and simulation models for forest management. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46 (5): 1- 11. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20230327
	李淑娟, 穆淑慧, 隋玉正, 等. 海洋保护地社区多元化生计与生态系统服务的依赖关系. 生态学报, 2024, 44 (8): 3157- 3171.
	Li S J, Mu S H, Sui Y Z, et al. The dependence of diversified community livelihood in ecosystem services of marine nature reserve. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44 (8): 3157- 3171.
	林敏慧, 余劭祺, 王雅君. 城市型自然公园游客拥挤感知与调适机制及其满意度研究. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38 (4): 1025- 1039. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20230413
	Lin M H, Yu S Q, Wang Y J. Study on visitors’ crowding perception, adjustment mechanism and satisfaction in urban natural parks. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38 (4): 1025- 1039. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20230413
	潘剑彬, 史　川, 黄田田, 等. 北京奥林匹克森林公园绿地人体感热舒适度空间差异特征. 风景园林, 2023, 30 (12): 114- 120. doi: 10.12409/j.fjyl.202302220087
	Pan J B, Shi C, Huang T T, et al. Spatial differentiation characteristics of human thermal comfort in Beijing Olympic Forest Park. Landscape Architecture, 2023, 30 (12): 114- 120. doi: 10.12409/j.fjyl.202302220087
	石美丽, 种培芳. 2023. 城市森林公园生态服务价值评价——以合肥市滨湖森林公园为例. 国土与自然资源研究, (4): 81-85.
	Shi M L, Zhong P F. 2023. Evaluation of ecological service value of urban forest park: taking Hefei Binhu forest park as an example. Territory & Natural Resources Study, (4): 81-85. ［in Chinese］
	宋晨雨, 李　龙, 付　伟. 基于CiteSpace可视化分析的国家森林公园研究进展. 林草政策研究, 2023, 3 (4): 49- 53. doi: 10.12344/lczcyj.2023.04.01.0001
	Song C Y, Li L, Fu W. Research progress in national forest park based on citespace visual analysis. Journal of Forestry and Grassland Policy, 2023, 3 (4): 49- 53. doi: 10.12344/lczcyj.2023.04.01.0001
	谭铃千, 郝培尧. 高密度城市面向人类福祉的生态系统文化服务研究进展. 中国园林, 2024, 40 (4): 36- 42.
	Tan L Q, Hao P Y. Review of the research progress of human wellbeing-oriented cultural ecosystem services in highdensity cities. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2024, 40 (4): 36- 42.
	吴殿鸣, 邵大伟. 城市公园绿地的社会空间分异逻辑、表征与调控路径. 中国城市林业, 2023, 21 (6): 26- 31. doi: 10.12169/zgcsly.2022.06.06.0001
	Wu D M, Shao D W. Social spatial differentiation of urban park green space: logic, representation and regulation path. Journal of Chinese Urban Forestry, 2023, 21 (6): 26- 31. doi: 10.12169/zgcsly.2022.06.06.0001
	闫　明, 敖　嫩, 陈利顶, 等. 城市生态品质公众感知与现状的定量指标研究. 生态学报, 2023, 43 (12): 4920- 4927.
	Yan M, Ao N, Chen L D, et al. Research on the quantitative indicators of public perception and status of urban ecological quality. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43 (12): 4920- 4927.
	张　文, 王伟峰, 杨建军. 城市森林公园景观美景度评价及影响因素分析. 中国园林, 2023, 39 (9): 106- 112.
	Zhang W, Wang W F, Yang J J. Scenic beauty evaluation and influencing factors analysis of urban forest parks. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2023, 39 (9): 106- 112.
	张　怡, 裘鸿菲. 基于Lda主题模型的湖泊公园生态系统文化服务公众感知研究. 中国园林, 2023, 39 (7): 121- 126.
	Zhang Y, Qiu H F. A study on public perception of cultural ecosystem services in lake parks based on latent dirichlet allocation model. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2023, 39 (7): 121- 126.
	钟敬秋, 高梦凡, 韩增林, 等. 基于生态系统文化服务的人地关系空间重构. 地理学报, 2024, 9 (1): 1- 18. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202407004
	Zhong J Q, Gao M F, Han Z L, et al. Spatial reconstruction the human-land relationship based on cultural ecosystem services. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2024, 9 (1): 1- 18. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202407004
	Deng Y, Yao Y, Zhang L. Analysis of urban wetland park cooling effects and their potential influence factors: evidence from 477 urban wetland parks in China. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 156, 111103. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111103
	Ferreira M L, Kniess C T, Silva W M, et al. Urban forests, territorial planning and political stability: key factors to face climate change in a megacity. Sustainability, 2023, 15 (13): 10092. doi: 10.3390/su151310092
	Jiang Q Z, Wang G X, Liang X Y, et al. Research on the perception of cultural ecosystem services in urban parks via analyses of online comment data. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 2022, 10 (5): 32- 51. doi: 10.15302/J-LAF-1-020072
	Lippert H, Kowarik I, Sstraka T M. People’s attitudes and emotions towards different urban forest types in the Berlin region, Germany. Land, 2022, 11 (5): 701. doi: 10.3390/land11050701
	Li X P, Li X L, Zhang M Y, et al. Urban park attributes as predictors for the diversity and composition of spontaneous plants —— a case in Beijing, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2024, 91, 128185.
	Mahmoudi B, Sorouri Z, Zenner E K, et al. Development of a new social resilience assessment model for urban forest parks. Environmental Development, 2022, 43, 100724. doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2022.100724
	Ríos-Rodríguez M L, Rosales C, Lorenzo M, et al. Influence of perceived environmental quality on the perceived restorativeness of public spaces. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 12, 644763. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.644763
	Shiraishi K. The inequity of distribution of urban forest and ecosystem services in Cali, Colombia. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2022, 67, 127446.
	Truscott J, Tsifaris P. Assessing the value of a park in a rural-urban fringe zone: a case study of kenna cartwright nature park in the interior of british columbia. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 2022, 17 (3): 62- 81.
	Velandia F, Motha J, Romerp-Duque L P, et al. Understanding the sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services in urban parks: a colombian study case. Urban Ecosystems, 2024, 27 (1): 289- 303. doi: 10.1007/s11252-023-01438-5
	Yan X, Guo J, Lan Y, et al. 2013. A biterm topic model for short texts//Proceedings of the 22^nd international conference on World Wide Web. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 1445−1456.
	Yao X, Sun Y, Sun B, et al. The impact of the urban forest park recreation environment and perceived satisfaction on post-tour behavioral intention—using Tongzhou grand canal forest park as an example. Forests, 2024, 15 (2): 330. doi: 10.3390/f15020330
	Yu K J, Wang D. Modular approach creating low-maintenance sponge city: Benjakitti forest park in Bangkok, Thailand. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 2023, 11 (1): 72- 85. doi: 10.15302/J-LAF-0-040003

森林公园 Forest park	项目Item	美学欣赏服务 Aesthetic appreciation services	休闲游憩服务 Leisure and recreation services	灵感获取服务 Inspiration acquisition services	文化遗产传承服务 Cultural heritage inheritance services	社会交流服务 Social interaction services	教育和认知服务 Education and cognitive services	情感连接服务Emotional connection services	健康促进服务 Health promotion services
方山 Fang Mountain	重要性 Importance	4.68	4.08	3.24	3.88	3.07	3.02	2.07	4.02
方山 Fang Mountain	满意度 Satisfaction	4.02	4.78	3.07	3.01	3.03	3.96	2.05	3.96

幕燕山 Muyan Mountain	重要性 Importance	4.46	4.19	2.14	3.27	1.98	2.99	2.44	3.99
幕燕山 Muyan Mountain	满意度 Satisfaction	4.22	4.59	2.49	3.22	3.01	3.02	2.33	4.02

牛首山 Niushou Mountain	重要性 Importance	4.97	4.51	3.06	3.89	3.56	3.52	4.41	4.52
牛首山 Niushou Mountain	满意度 Satisfaction	4.88	4.88	3.75	4.53	3.87	3.88	3.35	4.48

栖霞山Qixia Mountain	重要性 Importance	4.82	4.66	2.27	3.66	2.62	3.37	4.72	4.37
栖霞山Qixia Mountain	满意度 Satisfaction	4.93	4.91	3.99	4.18	4.33	4.13	3.68	4.33

高淳游子山 Gaochun Youzi Mountain	重要性 Importance	4.53	4.23	2.03	1.96	1.96	2.96	2.51	3.96
高淳游子山 Gaochun Youzi Mountain	满意度 Satisfaction	4.46	4.78	3.12	2.96	3.98	3.42	2.95	3.42

无想寺 Wuxiang Temple	重要性 Importance	4.47	4.02	2.18	3.47	1.64	2.66	2.31	3.66
无想寺 Wuxiang Temple	满意度 Satisfaction	4.45	4.54	3.25	2.77	3.33	3.33	2.16	3.33

南京南郊 Southern Suburbs of Nanjing	重要性 Importance	4.63	3.97	1.44	1.61	1.72	2.84	2.08	3.84
南京南郊 Southern Suburbs of Nanjing	满意度 Satisfaction	4.02	4.52	3.02	2.06	2.99	3.07	2.21	4.07

六合金牛湖 Liuhe Jinniu Lake	重要性 Importance	4.89	3.66	2.23	1.51	1.33	3.87	2.22	4.67
六合金牛湖 Liuhe Jinniu Lake	满意度 Satisfaction	4.06	4.73	2.98	1.99	3.16	4.36	2.86	4.36

平山 Ping Mountain	重要性 Importance	4.44	4.19	2.02	1.66	1.45	2.88	2.38	3.88
平山 Ping Mountain	满意度 Satisfaction	3.87	4.54	2.68	2.88	3.07	4.23	2.17	4.23

老山 Lao Mountain	重要性 Importance	4.65	3.99	2.32	2.45	2.18	3.23	2.76	4.23
老山 Lao Mountain	满意度 Satisfaction	4.19	4.66	3.22	2.25	3.65	4.12	2.08	4.12

[1]	Qian Wang,Lin Gu,Tianchu Li,Yuerong Wang,Lili Han. Ecological Health Function of Typical Recreational Forest in Beijing Xishan National Forest Park [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(5): 33-45.
[2]	Ke Wang,Hexian Jin,Chengcheng Zeng,Yanjun Wang,Yifan Wang,Yanhui Zhou. Influence of Landscape Plant Odor Type and Concentration on Human Physiology and Psychology under Olfactory Perception [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(1): 126-136.
[3]	Na Wang,Xinfeng Chen,Yongde Zhong. Evolutionary Logic and Practical Enlightenment of the Development of Forest Parks in China in the Past 40 Years [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(1): 138-150.
[4]	Yujie Zhu,Yuxi Weng,Weicong Fu,Jianwen Dong,Minhua Wang. Effects of Soundscape Perception on Health Benefits of Forest Parks: A Case Study of Fuzhou National Forest Park [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(3): 9-17.
[5]	Nan Dong,Hong Zhang,Chunhui Zhang. Tourist Satisfaction of Shaanxi National Forest Park——A Case Study in Taibai, Taiping, and Wangshunshan [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(3): 156-163.
[6]	Zhou Bin, Lei Fengyao, Yu Hu, Zhang Yichi. Recreational Motivations of Tourists Visiting the Simingshan National Forest Park [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(5): 163-168.
[7]	Liangang Zhang,Ling Zhi,Guangyu Wang,Ya Li. Influencing Factors and Improving Path of Farmers' Satisfaction with the Grain for Green Project: A Case Study of Heqing County in Yunnan Province and Zhijin County in Guizhou Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(12): 123-132.
[8]	Li Hua, Wang Yuqing, Chen Feiping. Evaluation of Tourist Survey of Soundscape in Meiling National Forest Park [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(6): 9-15.
[9]	Fu Weicong, Zhu Zhipeng, Chen Ziru, Huang Shuping, Wang Minhua, Ding Guochang, Dong Jianwen. Patterns of Variation in Atmospheric Visibility and Impacting Factors in Qiandao Lake National Forest Park, China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(1): 22-31.
[10]	Gong Peng, Zhang Lüshui, Gu Xinren. Influences of Prototype Landscape on People's Perceptions of Urban Plant Landscape [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(9): 67-76.
[11]	Qin Zhong, Li Zhandong, Cheng Fangyun, Sha Haifeng. Cooling and Humidifying Effects of Five Landscape Plant Communities on Summer Days in Beijing [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(1): 37-47.
[12]	Zhao Minyan, Chen Xinfeng. The Development and Management of Forest Parks in China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(1): 118-127.
[13]	Yang Jianming, Yu Yaling, You Lilan. Segmentation by Visitor Motivation in Fuzhou National Forest Park: A Factor-Cluster Approach [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(9): 106-116.
[14]	Huang Xiujuan, Lin Xiuzhi. Tourism Efficiency and Influence Factors of Chinese Forest Parks [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(2): 137-146.
[15]	Zhang Liangang, Zhi Ling, Zhang Jing, Xie Yanming. Multilayer Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of the Satisfaction with Forestry’ Specialized Cooperative Organization [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(8): 154-161.

Public Preference and Perception for Cultural Ecosystem Services of Urban Forest Parks

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 0

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments