Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2021, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (3): 9-17.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210302
Previous Articles Next Articles
Yujie Zhu,Yuxi Weng,Weicong Fu,Jianwen Dong,Minhua Wang*
Received:
2020-09-04
Online:
2021-03-25
Published:
2021-04-07
Contact:
Minhua Wang
CLC Number:
Yujie Zhu,Yuxi Weng,Weicong Fu,Jianwen Dong,Minhua Wang. Effects of Soundscape Perception on Health Benefits of Forest Parks: A Case Study of Fuzhou National Forest Park[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(3): 9-17.
Table 1
Environmental characteristics of sample plots"
样地编号 Sample plot No. | 位置 Location | 环境特征 Environment characteristic | 等效连续A声级 LeqA dB |
S1 | 荫生植物园 Shade-tolerate type botanical garden | 林下景观,植被丰富 Forest landscape, rich vegetation | 36 |
S2 | 竹类观赏园 Bamboo garden | 竹林,游憩小径 Bamboo forest, recreation path | 42 |
S3 | 竹类观赏园 Bamboo garden | 硬质铺装较多,人工化程度高 Hard pavement more, high degree of artificialization | 41 |
S4 | 千年古榕 Banyan for thousands of years | 有开阔的草坪和千年古榕树 There are open lawns and thousands of years old banyan trees | 34 |
S5 | 千年古榕 Banyan for thousands of years | 水畔游憩地,有开阔的平静水面和千年古榕树 Riverside recreation, open calm water and thousands of years old banyan trees | 51 |
S6 | 桃花园Peach garden | 地形有略微的起伏,旁有正心寺 Terrain has a slight undulation, there is the heart temple | 42 |
S7 | 紫薇园Myrtle park | 以不同品种的紫薇为主,部分有开花 Crape myrtle of different breed is given priority to, part has blossom | 36 |
S8 | 漫水桥Submersible bridge | 跌水景观,视野开阔 Drop water landscape, pantoscopic | 53 |
S9 | 樱花园Cherry garden | 樱花、木质小径、林中景观 Cherry blossom, wooden path, forest landscape | 45 |
S10 | 听泉亭 Listen to the spring pavilion | 较为自然的溪流景观 Natural stream landscape | 56 |
Table 2
Soundscape perception degree of the sample land"
声景Soundscape | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | S6 | S7 | S8 | S9 | S10 |
流水声Running water sound | 1.200 | 1.067 | 1.167 | 1.167 | 5.700 | 1.100 | 3.000 | 6.500 | 1.200 | 6.800 |
鸟鸣声Chirm | 5.033 | 4.633 | 4.633 | 5.967 | 5.000 | 5.533 | 6.067 | 3.067 | 4.533 | 2.933 |
虫鸣声Chirping | 5.400 | 5.800 | 5.000 | 4.033 | 3.600 | 5.000 | 4.967 | 2.767 | 5.833 | 4.033 |
蝉鸣声Cicadas chirp | 4.900 | 6.167 | 5.500 | 3.533 | 2.933 | 4.533 | 4.733 | 2.233 | 4.700 | 3.767 |
风吹树叶声Wind rustling in the leaves | 2.500 | 2.900 | 2.933 | 2.033 | 2.300 | 2.267 | 3.500 | 2.033 | 2.767 | 2.267 |
风声Wind sound | 2.100 | 2.667 | 2.500 | 1.900 | 2.033 | 2.033 | 3.267 | 1.700 | 2.233 | 1.933 |
脚步声Footsteps | 1.567 | 1.067 | 1.367 | 1.400 | 1.933 | 1.100 | 1.500 | 1.067 | 1.167 | 1.033 |
谈话声Conversation | 1.033 | 1.133 | 1.300 | 1.467 | 3.467 | 1.200 | 1.033 | 1.133 | 1.100 | 1.033 |
儿童嬉戏声Children’s frolicking | 1.033 | 1.133 | 1.033 | 1.767 | 3.233 | 1.067 | 1.033 | 1.033 | 1.100 | 1.033 |
交通声Traffic noise | 1.233 | 1.133 | 1.533 | 1.433 | 1.067 | 1.300 | 1.033 | 1.133 | 1.300 | 1.033 |
钟声Temple bells | 1.033 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.200 | 1.033 | 4.867 | 1.000 | 1.033 | 1.033 | 1.000 |
Table 3
Difference of physiological index between pressure stage and recovery stage"
样地 Sample plot | 生理指标 Physiological index | 压力阶段Pressure stage | 恢复阶段Recovery stage | 均值差 Mean difference | Z | |||
均值Mean | 标准差SD | 均值Mean | 标准差SD | |||||
S1 | SCLr | 0.091 | 0.315 | 0.072 | 0.324 | -0.019 | -0.562 | |
HR | 84.767 | 5.788 | 84.200 | 6.354 | -0.567 | -0.629 | ||
LF/HF | 0.523 | 0.225 | 0.465 | 0.229 | -0.057 | -2.407* | ||
S2 | SCLr | 0.214 | 0.338 | 0.190 | 0.333 | -0.024 | -2.016* | |
HR | 86.100 | 5.991 | 85.467 | 5.367 | -0.633 | -0.638 | ||
LF/HF | 0.470 | 0.252 | 0.407 | 0.188 | -0.063 | -1.594 | ||
S3 | SCLr | 0.092 | 0.310 | 0.084 | 0.314 | -0.008 | -0.453 | |
HR | 86.333 | 4.978 | 86.000 | 6.253 | -0.333 | -0.038 | ||
LF/HF | 0.581 | 0.325 | 0.558 | 0.257 | -0.023 | -0.854 | ||
S4 | SCLr | 0.106 | 0.384 | 0.066 | 0.364 | -0.040 | -2.715** | |
HR | 86.033 | 6.311 | 85.133 | 6.394 | -0.900 | -1.107 | ||
LF/HF | 0.603 | 0.395 | 0.530 | 0.348 | -0.073 | -2.458* | ||
S5 | SCLr | 0.084 | 0.346 | 0.063 | 0.364 | -0.021 | -0.984 | |
HR | 85.033 | 6.212 | 84.300 | 4.735 | -0.733 | -0.820 | ||
LF/HF | 0.498 | 0.262 | 0.439 | 0.204 | -0.059 | -1.491 | ||
S6 | SCLr | 0.133 | 0.314 | 0.078 | 0.306 | -0.055 | -1.224 | |
HR | 86.233 | 5.097 | 85.267 | 5.681 | -0.967 | -1.110 | ||
LF/HF | 0.636 | 0.374 | 0.544 | 0.290 | -0.092 | -2.047* | ||
S7 | SCLr | 0.163 | 0.330 | 0.054 | 0.363 | -0.109 | -2.808** | |
HR | 87.133 | 5.204 | 84.233 | 5.056 | -2.900 | -2.340* | ||
LF/HF | 0.513 | 0.227 | 0.372 | 0.178 | -0.141 | -4.268*** | ||
S8 | SCLr | 0.195 | 0.322 | 0.123 | 0.345 | -0.072 | -1.707 | |
HR | 85.633 | 4.414 | 84.233 | 5.335 | -1.400 | -1.686 | ||
LF/HF | 0.595 | 0.321 | 0.477 | 0.252 | -0.118 | -2.480* | ||
S9 | SCLr | 0.155 | 0.322 | 0.089 | 0.391 | -0.066 | -1.502 | |
HR | 85.767 | 5.494 | 84.733 | 6.438 | -1.033 | -1.292 | ||
LF/HF | 0.572 | 0.338 | 0.443 | 0.237 | -0.128 | -2.057* | ||
S10 | SCLr | 0.235 | 0.392 | 0.111 | 0.395 | -0.124 | -2.822** | |
HR | 85.933 | 5.285 | 84.300 | 4.872 | -1.633 | -2.194* | ||
LF/HF | 0.524 | 0.251 | 0.422 | 0.229 | -0.103 | -2.973** |
Table 4
Differences in the health benefits of silent video and audio video"
样地 Sample plot | 生理指标 Physiological index | 有声视频Audio video | 无声视频Silenv video | 均值差 Mean difference | Z | |||
均值Mean | 标准差SD | 均值Mean | 标准差SD | |||||
S1 | SCLr | -0.019 | 0.089 | -0.010 | 0.110 | -0.009 | -0.401 | |
HR | -0.567 | 4.681 | -0.400 | 4.446 | -0.167 | -0.342 | ||
LF/HF | -0.057 | 0.166 | -0.022 | 0.091 | -0.035 | -1.018 | ||
S2 | SCLr | -0.024 | 0.070 | -0.005 | 0.088 | -0.019 | -0.360 | |
HR | -0.633 | 6.133 | -0.133 | 4.953 | -0.500 | -0.082 | ||
LF/HF | -0.063 | 0.219 | -0.031 | 0.314 | -0.032 | -0.998 | ||
S3 | SCLr | -0.008 | 0.065 | -0.001 | 0.224 | -0.007 | -0.381 | |
HR | -0.333 | 6.194 | -0.133 | 5.104 | -0.200 | -0.455 | ||
LF/HF | -0.024 | 0.239 | -0.011 | 0.251 | -0.013 | -0.072 | ||
S4 | SCLr | -0.040 | 0.081 | -0.035 | 0.064 | -0.005 | -0.051 | |
HR | -0.900 | 3.546 | -0.500 | 3.093 | -0.400 | -0.310 | ||
LF/HF | -0.073 | 0.204 | -0.049 | 0.408 | -0.024 | -0.154 | ||
S5 | SCLr | -0.021 | 0.082 | -0.034 | 0.132 | 0.013 | -0.956 | |
HR | -0.733 | 5.179 | -1.000 | 3.572 | 0.267 | -0.057 | ||
LF/HF | -0.059 | 0.311 | -0.085 | 0.124 | 0.026 | -0.195 | ||
S6 | SCLr | -0.055 | 0.296 | -0.053 | 0.212 | -0.002 | -0.720 | |
HR | -0.967 | 4.476 | -0.133 | 5.686 | -0.833 | -0.707 | ||
LF/HF | -0.092 | 0.252 | -0.054 | 0.239 | -0.038 | -0.710 | ||
S7 | SCLr | -0.109 | 0.187 | -0.054 | 0.186 | -0.055 | -1.162 | |
HR | -2.900 | 6.483 | -0.300 | 6.670 | -2.600 | -2.068* | ||
LF/HF | -0.141 | 0.132 | -0.027 | 0.168 | -0.114 | -2.664** | ||
S8 | SCLr | -0.072 | 0.383 | -0.008 | 0.341 | -0.064 | -2.643** | |
HR | -1.400 | 4.854 | -0.333 | 6.583 | -1.067 | -0.779 | ||
LF/HF | -0.118 | 0.253 | -0.069 | 0.313 | -0.049 | -1.059 | ||
S9 | SCLr | -0.066 | 0.290 | -0.036 | 0.204 | -0.030 | -0.627 | |
HR | -1.033 | 5.933 | -0.467 | 5.008 | -0.567 | -0.331 | ||
LF/HF | -0.128 | 0.352 | -0.071 | 0.227 | -0.057 | -1.018 | ||
S10 | SCLr | -0.124 | 0.247 | -0.068 | 0.249 | -0.056 | -2.993** | |
HR | -1.633 | 3.605 | -0.467 | 5.476 | -1.167 | -1.141 | ||
LF/HF | -0.103 | 0.160 | -0.054 | 0.111 | -0.048 | -0.833 |
Table 5
Optimal scale regression analysis of soundscape perception and health benefits"
因变量 Dependent variable | 自变量(感知程度) Independent variable(Perception degree) | 自变量标准化系数 Standardized coefficient of independent variable | df | F | 显著性 Sig. | 重要性 Significance | |
β | 标准误差 Standard error | ||||||
ΔSCLr | 流水声Running water sound | -0.489 | 0.055 | 3 | 77.806 | 0.000 | 0.301 |
鸟鸣声Chirm | -0.499 | 0.054 | 3 | 86.780 | 0.000 | 0.482 | |
虫鸣声Chirping | -0.097 | 0.108 | 3 | 0.818 | 0.485 | 0.048 | |
蝉鸣声Cicadas chirp | -0.216 | 0.102 | 3 | 4.490 | 0.004 | 0.095 | |
风吹树叶声Wind rustling in the leaves | 0.075 | 0.129 | 2 | 0.334 | 0.716 | 0.003 | |
风声Wind sound | 0.035 | 0.120 | 1 | 0.084 | 0.772 | 0.002 | |
脚步声Footsteps | 0.081 | 0.053 | 4 | 2.383 | 0.052 | 0.019 | |
谈话声Conversation | 0.042 | 0.110 | 2 | 0.144 | 0.866 | 0.000 | |
儿童嬉戏声Children’s frolicking | 0.107 | 0.090 | 2 | 1.403 | 0.248 | 0.026 | |
交通声Traffic noise | -0.044 | 0.085 | 1 | 0.270 | 0.603 | 0.003 | |
钟声Temple bells | -0.079 | 0.093 | 3 | 0.729 | 0.535 | 0.023 | |
ΔLF/HF | 流水声Running water sound | -0.289 | 0.108 | 2 | 7.215 | 0.001 | 0.154 |
鸟鸣声Chirm | -0.355 | 0.145 | 3 | 5.996 | 0.001 | 0.362 | |
虫鸣声Chirping | 0.094 | 0.101 | 2 | 0.868 | 0.421 | 0.012 | |
蝉鸣声Cicadas chirp | -0.342 | 0.163 | 4 | 4.405 | 0.002 | 0.306 | |
风吹树叶声Wind rustling in the leaves | 0.157 | 0.111 | 3 | 2.010 | 0.113 | 0.002 | |
风声Wind sound | -0.187 | 0.119 | 4 | 2.460 | 0.046 | 0.052 | |
脚步声Footsteps | 0.052 | 0.099 | 2 | 0.272 | 0.762 | 0.002 | |
谈话声Conversation | 0.131 | 0.111 | 4 | 1.407 | 0.232 | 0.018 | |
儿童嬉戏声Children’s frolicking | -0.180 | 0.139 | 2 | 1.691 | 0.186 | 0.077 | |
交通声Traffic noise | -0.051 | 0.111 | 1 | 0.211 | 0.646 | 0.014 | |
钟声Temple bells | 0.036 | 0.106 | 2 | 0.119 | 0.888 | 0.001 |
李华, 王雨晴, 陈飞平. 梅岭国家森林公园声景观的游客调查评价. 林业科学, 2018, 54 (6): 9- 15. | |
Li H , Wang Y Q , Chen F P . Evaluation of tourist survey of soundscape in Meiling national forest park. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54 (6): 9- 15. | |
王雁, 陈鑫峰. 心理物理学方法在国外森林景观评价中的应用. 林业科学, 1999, 35 (5): 110- 117.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.1999.05.020 |
|
Wang Y , Chen X F . Application of psychophysical method in evaluation of foreign forest landscapes. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1999, 35 (5): 110- 117.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.1999.05.020 |
|
钟乐, 邱文, 钟鹏, 等. 防御传染病的风景园林应对策略设想: 基于打破传染链的视角. 中国园林, 2020, 36 (7): 37- 42. | |
Zhong L , Qiu W , Zhong P , et al. Landscape architecture strategic plan for infectious diseases defense: based on transmission chain prevention. Chinese Garden, 2020, 36 (7): 37- 42. | |
Aletta F , Oberman T , Kang J . Associations between positive health-related effects and soundscapes perceptual constructs: a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15 (11): 2392.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112392 |
|
Alvarsson J J , Wiens S , Nilsson M E . Stress recovery during exposure to nature sound and environmental noise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2010, 7 (3): 1036- 1046.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph7031036 |
|
Anna C , Tony C . A methodological approach to understanding the wellbeing and restorative benefits associated with greenspace. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2016, 19 (1): 103- 109. | |
Annerstedt M , J nsson P , Wallergård M , et al. Inducing physiological stress recovery with sounds of nature in a virtual reality forest——results from a pilot study. Physiology & Behavior, 2013, 118 (11): 240- 250. | |
Deng L , Luo H , Ma J , et al. Effects of integration between visual stimuli and auditory stimuli on restorative potential and aesthetic preference in urban green spaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2020, 53, 126702. | |
Hedblom M , Gunnarsson B , Iravani B , et al. Reduction of physiological stress by urban green space in a multisensory virtual experiment. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9 (1): 10113.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46099-7 |
|
Jeon J Y , Lee P J , You J , et al. Acoustical characteristics of water sounds for soundscape enhancement in urban open spaces. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2012, 131 (3): 2101- 2109.
doi: 10.1121/1.3681938 |
|
Jo H , Song C , Ikei H , et al. Physiological and psychological effects of forest and urban sounds using high-resolution sound sources. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16 (15): 2649.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152649 |
|
Karjalainen E , Sarjala T , Raitio H . Promoting human health through forests: overview and major challenges. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 2010, 15 (1): 1- 8.
doi: 10.1007/s12199-008-0069-2 |
|
Lin W , Chen Q , Zhang X , et al. Effects of different bamboo forest spaces on psychophysiological stress and spatial scale evaluation. Forests, 2020, 11 (6): 616.
doi: 10.3390/f11060616 |
|
Li Z Z , Kang J . Sensitivity analysis of changes in human physiological indicators observed in soundscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2019, 190, 103593.
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103593 |
|
Medvedev O , Shepherd D , Hautus M J . The restorative potential of soundscapes: a physiological investigation. Applied Acoustics, 2015, 96, 20- 26.
doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.03.004 |
|
Ratcliffe E , Gatersleben B , Sowden P T . Bird sounds and their contributions to perceived attention restoration and stress recovery. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2013, 36 (4): 221- 228. | |
Ratcliffe E , Gatersleben B , Sowden P T . Associations with bird sounds: how do they relate to perceived restorative potential?. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2016, 47, 136- 144.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.009 |
|
Song C , Ikei H , Miyazaki Y . Physiological effects of forest-related visual, olfactory, and combined stimuli on humans: an additive combined effect. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2019, 44, 126437. | |
Stamps A E . Demographic effects in environmental aesthetics: a meta-analysis. Journal of Planning Literature, 1999, 14 (2): 155- 175.
doi: 10.1177/08854129922092630 |
|
Suko Y , Saito K , Takayama N , et al. Effect of faint road traffic noise mixed in birdsong on the perceived restorativeness and listeners' physiological response: an exploratory study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16 (24): 4985.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph16244985 |
|
Tedja Y W , Tsaih L . Water soundscape and listening impression. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2015, 138 (3): 1750. | |
Tsunetsugu Y , Lee J , Park B J , et al. Physiological and psychological effects of viewing urban forest landscapes assessed by multiple measurements. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2013, 113, 90- 93.
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.014 |
|
Ulrich R S , Simons R F , Losito B D , et al. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1991, 11 (3): 201- 230.
doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7 |
|
Vescio B , Salsone M , Gambardella A . Comparison between electrocardiographic and earlobe pulse photoplethysmographic detection for evaluating heart rate variability in healthy subjects in short- and long-term recordings. Sensors (Basel), 2018, 18 (3): 844.
doi: 10.3390/s18030844 |
|
Wang X B , Shi Y X , Zhang B , et al. The influence of forest resting environments on stress using virtual reality. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16 (18): 3263.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183263 |
|
Watts G R , Pheasant R J , Horoshenkov K V , et al. Measurement and subjective assessment of water generated sounds. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 2009, 95 (6): 1032- 1039.
doi: 10.3813/AAA.918235 |
|
White M , Smith A , Humphryes K , et al. Blue space: the importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, 30 (4): 482- 493.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.004 |
|
White M P , Pahl S , Ashbullby K , et al. Feelings of restoration from recent nature visits. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2013, 35, 40- 51.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.04.002 |
|
Yu C P , Lin C M , Tsai M J , et al. Effects of short forest bathing program on autonomic nervous system activity and mood states in middle-aged and elderly individuals. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2017, 14 (8): 897.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph14080897 |
|
Yu C P , Lee H Y , Luo X Y . The effect of virtual reality forest and urban environments on physiological and psychological responses. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2018, 35 (1): 106- 114. |
[1] | Nan Dong,Hong Zhang,Chunhui Zhang. Tourist Satisfaction of Shaanxi National Forest Park——A Case Study in Taibai, Taiping, and Wangshunshan [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(3): 156-163. |
[2] | Zezhou Hao,Cheng Wang,Nancai Pei,Xinhui Xu,Chang Zhang,Wenjun Duan,Ziyan Wang. Diversity of Soundscape in Three Urban Forests in Spring, Shenzhen [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(2): 184-192. |
[3] | Zhou Bin, Lei Fengyao, Yu Hu, Zhang Yichi. Recreational Motivations of Tourists Visiting the Simingshan National Forest Park [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(5): 163-168. |
[4] | Li Hua, Wang Yuqing, Chen Feiping. Evaluation of Tourist Survey of Soundscape in Meiling National Forest Park [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(6): 9-15. |
[5] | Fu Weicong, Zhu Zhipeng, Chen Ziru, Huang Shuping, Wang Minhua, Ding Guochang, Dong Jianwen. Patterns of Variation in Atmospheric Visibility and Impacting Factors in Qiandao Lake National Forest Park, China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(1): 22-31. |
[6] | Qin Zhong, Li Zhandong, Cheng Fangyun, Sha Haifeng. Cooling and Humidifying Effects of Five Landscape Plant Communities on Summer Days in Beijing [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(1): 37-47. |
[7] | Zhao Minyan, Chen Xinfeng. The Development and Management of Forest Parks in China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(1): 118-127. |
[8] | Yang Jianming, Yu Yaling, You Lilan. Segmentation by Visitor Motivation in Fuzhou National Forest Park: A Factor-Cluster Approach [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(9): 106-116. |
[9] | Huang Xiujuan, Lin Xiuzhi. Tourism Efficiency and Influence Factors of Chinese Forest Parks [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(2): 137-146. |
[10] | Chen Feiping;Liao Weiming. Construction of an Evaluation Index System on the Forest Soundscape [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012, 48(4): 56-60. |
[11] | Xiang Yanping. Tourism Competition Evaluation of the National Forest Park: a Way of Niche: A Case of Zhangjiajie and Tianmenshan National Forest Park [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47(4): 152-158. |
[12] | Huang Xiujuan. Comparison and Analysis on the Tourism Efficiency of Forest Parks in China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47(12): 22-27. |
[13] | Mi FengHuang Lili;Sun Fengjun. Evaluation of Ecological Security for the Jiufeng National Forest Park in Beijing [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(11): 52-58. |
[14] | Huang Xiujuan;Liu Weiping;Lan Siren. Evaluation Model of Forest Park Tourism Products and Its Application ——In View Point of Suitability of Tourism Product Development [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2009, 12(7): 111-118. |
[15] | Wen Yijun;Zhou Genmiao;Zhang Xiaolei;Lü Yong. Evaluation of the Scenic Forest Landscape Aesthetic Based on the Rough Set [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2009, 12(1): 1-7. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||