Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2019, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (12): 123-132.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20191213
• Discussion • Previous Articles Next Articles
Liangang Zhang1,Ling Zhi1,*,Guangyu Wang2,Ya Li1
Received:
2018-11-27
Online:
2019-12-25
Published:
2020-01-02
Contact:
Ling Zhi
Supported by:
CLC Number:
Liangang Zhang,Ling Zhi,Guangyu Wang,Ya Li. Influencing Factors and Improving Path of Farmers' Satisfaction with the Grain for Green Project: A Case Study of Heqing County in Yunnan Province and Zhijin County in Guizhou Province[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(12): 123-132.
Table 1
Variable definition and descriptive statistics"
观察变量 Observed variable | 变量说明 Explanation of variable | 均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation |
工程预期 Expectation of the project | 您认为退耕还林工程能长久坚持下去吗?Do you think if the grain for green project can be carried on for long? | 4.06 | 0.955 |
政策知晓 Understanding of the policy | 您了解退耕还林工程的政策内容吗? Do you know the policy of the grain for green project? | 2.60 | 1.212 |
工程认可 Identification with the project | 您认为退耕还林工程有必要继续实施吗?Do you think if it is necessary to carry on the grain for green project? | 3.95 | 0.982 |
资金投入意愿 Willing of capital investment | 您在承包经营林地上是否愿意投入较大资金?Are you willing to invest more money in your contracted woodland? | 2.89 | 1.247 |
投工参与程度 Degree of labor participation | 您投工参与林草业管护或经营的程度?How much do you want to participate in the management of your contracted woodland? | 2.21 | 1.426 |
林地长期经营意愿 Intention of long woodland operation | 对于您家的林地,是否有长期经营的打算?Are you willing to operate your own woodland in the long run? | 3.78 | 1.077 |
政策兑现 Policy fulfillment | 您认为退耕还林补偿款的及时或足额兑现情况如何?Do you think if your compensation can be fulfilled instantly and entirely? | 3.81 | 0.863 |
补偿透明度 Compensation transparency | 您认为退耕还林补偿方案的透明度如何?What is the transparency of the compensation scheme for the grain for green project? | 3.71 | 0.920 |
自我能力发展满意(补偿方式满意) Satisfaction with self-development(Satisfaction with compensation method) | 您对退耕还林补偿方式的满意度如何?How satisfied are you with the compensation method for the grain for green project? | 3.86 | 0.952 |
利益补偿满意(补偿标准满意) Satisfaction with interest compensation (Satisfaction with compensation standard) | 您对退耕还林补偿标准的满意度如何?How satisfied are you with the compensation standard for the grain for green project? | 3.44 | 1.059 |
政策稳定性满意(补偿期限满意) Satisfaction with policy stability(Satisfaction with compensation deadline) | 您对退耕还林补偿期限的满意度如何?How satisfied are you with the compensation deadline for the grain for green project? | 3.44 | 1.063 |
技术支持满意 Satisfaction with technical support | 您对退耕还林工程的技术支持满意度如何?How satisfied are you with the technical guidance for the grain for green project? | 3.26 | 1.330 |
Table 2
Cronbach's α coefficients of latent variables and factor loading of observed variables"
潜在变量 Latent variable | Cronbach’s α系数 Cronbach’s α coefficient | 观测变量 Observed variables | 因子载荷 Factor loading |
认知度 Cognition degree | 0.802 | 工程预期Expectation of the project | 0.731 |
政策知晓Understanding of the policy | 0.662 | ||
工程认可Identification with the project | 0.755 | ||
参与度 Participation degree | 0.921 | 资金投入意愿Willing of capital investment | 0.692 |
投工参与程度Degree of labor participation | 0.838 | ||
林地长期经营意愿Intention of long woodland operation | 0.712 | ||
执行度 Implementation degree | 0.887 | 政策兑现Policy fulfillment | 0.739 |
补偿透明度Compensation transparency | 0.805 | ||
满意度 Satisfaction degree | 0.831 | 自我能力发展满意(补偿方式满意) Satisfaction with self-development (Satisfaction with compensation method) | 0.739 |
利益补偿满意(补偿标准满意) Satisfaction with interest compensation (Satisfaction with compensation standard) | 0.878 | ||
政策稳定性满意(补偿期限满意) Satisfaction with policy stability (Satisfaction with compensation deadline) | 0.796 | ||
技术支持满意Satisfaction with technical support | 0.805 |
Table 3
Overall fit of whole model"
指数分类 Index classification | 检验指数 Test index | 适配标准 Adaptation standard | 初始模型拟合值 Initial model fit | 最终模型拟合值 Final model fit |
简约拟合指数 Simple fitting index | χ2/df | <2 | 2.175 | 1.838 |
PNFI | >0.5 | 0.536 | 0.531 | |
PCFI | >0.5 | 0.719 | 0.637 | |
绝对拟合指数 Absolute fitting index | GFI | >0.9 | 0.866 | 0.923 |
RMSEA | <0.08 | 0.069 | 0.061 | |
相对拟合指数 Relative fitting index | IFI | >0.9 | 0.944 | 0.907 |
TLI | >0.9 | 0.871 | 0.915 | |
RFI | >0.9 | 0.937 | 0.956 |
Table 4
Standard estimation results and hypothesis verification"
研究假说 Hypothesis | 研究假说路径 Hypothesis path | 标准化系数 Standard coefficients | P | 结论 Conclusion |
H1 | 农户对退耕还林工程的认知度正向影响其满意度Farmers’ cognition of the project positively affects their satisfaction | 0.254 | *** | 接受 Acceptance |
H2 | 农户对退耕还林工程的认知度正向影响其参与度Farmers’ cognition of the project positively affects their participation | 0.193 | *** | 接受 Acceptance |
H3 | 农户对退耕还林工程的参与度正向影响其满意度Farmers’ participation in the project positively affects their satisfaction | 0.607 | *** | 接受 Acceptance |
H4 | 退耕还林工程的执行度正向影响农户对其认知度The implementation of the project positively affects farmers’ cognition of the project | 0.425 | *** | 接受 Acceptance |
H5 | 退耕还林工程的执行度正向影响农户对其参与度The implementation of the project positively affects farmers’ participation in the project | 0.411 | 0.145 | 拒绝 Refusal |
H6 | 退耕还林工程的执行度正向影响农户对其满意度The implementation of the project positively affects farmers’ satisfaction on the project | 0.294 | *** | 接受 Acceptance |
段伟, 申津羽, 温亚利. 西部地区退耕还林工程对农户收入的影响——基于异质性的处理效应估计. 农业技术经济, 2018. (2): 41- 53. | |
Duan W , Shen J Y , Wen Y L . The effect of the sloping land conversion program on rural households'income in western areas:treatment effect estimation based on heterogeneity. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2018. (2): 41- 53. | |
柯水发, 赵铁珍. 农户参与退耕还林意愿影响因素实证分析. 中国土地科学, 2008. 22 (7): 29- 35. | |
Ke S F , Zhao T Z . Empirical analysis on factors influencing on peasant households'willingness of participation in conversion of cultivated land to forest land program. China Land Science, 2008. 22 (7): 29- 35. | |
李荣耀. 后退耕时代农民退耕还林意愿的实证分析——基于陕西省吴起县248个农户的调查. 林业资源管理, 2011. (4): 20- 25.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6622.2011.04.005 |
|
Li R Y . Farmer's willingness of maintaining the results of the grain-for-green program:based on the investigation of 248 farmer households of Wuqi county in Shaanxi province. Forest Resources Management, 2011. (4): 20- 25.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6622.2011.04.005 |
|
李月娥, 卢珊. 辽宁省城市老年人主观幸福感影响因素研究——基于结构方程模型的分析. 西南交通大学学报:社会科学版, 2018. (1): 89- 96. | |
Li Y E , Lu S . Study on the influencing factors of subjective well-being of urban elderly in Liaoning province:based on the analysis of structural equation model. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University:Social Sciences, 2018. (1): 89- 96. | |
刘璨, 张巍. 退耕还林政策选择对农户收入的影响——以我国京津风沙源治理工程为例. 经济学(季刊), 2006. (10): 273- 290. | |
Liu C , Zhang W . Impacts of conversion of farmland to forestland program on household income:evidence from a sand control program in the vicinity of Beijing and Tianjin. China Economic Quarterly, 2006. (10): 273- 290. | |
刘浩, 陈思焜, 张敏新, 等. 退耕还林工程对农户收入不平等影响的测度与分析——基于总收入决定方程的Shapley值分解. 林业科学, 2017. 53 (5): 125- 133. | |
Liu H , Chen S K , Zhang M X , et al. Measuring and analyzing the impact of sloping land conversion program on rural households'income inequality:Shapley value decomposition approach for total income decision equation. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017. 53 (5): 125- 133. | |
刘庆博, 支玲. 退耕还林补偿问题研究综述. 世界林业研究, 2010. 23 (1): 44- 49. | |
Liu Q B , Zhi L . A review of compensation in conversion of cropland to forest program. World Forestry Research, 2010. 23 (1): 44- 49. | |
皮泓漪, 张萌雪, 夏建新. 退耕还林生态补偿标准研究——基于宁夏泾源县农户调查数据. 林业经济问题, 2018. (2): 39- 44. | |
Pi H Y , Zhang M X , Xia J X . Ecological compensation standards of the grain for green program:based on the survey data of farmers in Jingyuan county of Ningxia. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2018. (2): 39- 44. | |
万海远, 李超. 农户退耕还林政策的参与决策研究. 统计研究, 2013. 30 (10): 83- 91.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4565.2013.10.012 |
|
Wan H Y , Li C . Study on the participation in decision-making on sloping land conversion program for peasants. Statistical Research, 2013. 30 (10): 83- 91.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4565.2013.10.012 |
|
汪阳洁, 姜志德, 王晓兵. 退耕还林(草)补贴对农户种植业生产行为的影响. 中国农村经济, 2012. (11): 56- 68. | |
Wang Y J , Jiang Z D , Wang X B . Impact of returning slope farmland to woodland or grassland on farmers' crop farming production. Chinese Rural Economy, 2012. (11): 56- 68. | |
危丽, 杨先斌, 刘燕. 农户参与意愿与退耕还林政策的可持续性. 重庆大学学报:社会科学版, 2006. 12 (6): 29- 35. | |
Wei L , Yang X B , Liu Y . Farmer's participation willingness and the sustainability of the grain-for-green project policy. Journal of Chongqing University:Social Science Edition, 2006. 12 (6): 29- 35. | |
徐建英, 孔明, 刘新新, 等. 生计资本对农户再参与退耕还林意愿的影响——以卧龙自然保护区为例. 生态学报, 2017. 37 (18): 6205- 6215. | |
Xu J Y , Kong M , Liu X X , et al. The effect of livelihood capital on the willingness of farmers to re-enroll in the grain for green program:a case study in Wolong Nature Reserve. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017. 37 (18): 6205- 6215. | |
严玲, 江静, 郭亮, 等. 合同补偿中公平感知对承包人履约行为影响的实证研究. 管理学报, 2018. (5): 660- 668.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2018.05.004 |
|
Yan L , Jiang J , Guo L , et al. An empirical study on the impact of justice perceptions on contractors' performance behaviors in construction contract compensation. Chinese Journal of Management, 2018. (5): 660- 668.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2018.05.004 |
|
喻永红. 补贴期后农户退耕还林的态度研究——以重庆万州为例. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014. 23 (6): 774- 780.
doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201406005 |
|
Yu Y H . Study on farmers' attitudes toward the grain for green after the ending of governmental subsidy:a case of Wanzhou district in Chongqing. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2014. 23 (6): 774- 780.
doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201406005 |
|
张朝辉, 耿玉德, 王太祥. 农户退耕意愿影响因素的贫困尺度差异分析——基于新疆阿克苏地区的调研数据. 林业经济问题, 2018. 38 (1): 1- 6, 99. | |
Zhang C H , Geng Y D , Wang T X . Research on the differences of influencing factors of farmers' willingness to participate in GTGP from the view of poverty scale:based on the survey data of Aksu region in Xinjiang. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2018. 38 (1): 1- 6, 99. | |
张连刚, 柯水发. 农户对林业专业合作组织满意度的影响因素实证分析. 西北林学院学报, 2015. 30 (1): 285- 292.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2015.01.49 |
|
Zhang L G , Ke S F . Empirical analysis on the influence of farmers'satisfaction in specialized forestry cooperative organization and its mechanism of action. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2015. 30 (1): 285- 292.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2015.01.49 |
|
朱长宁, 王树进. 退耕还林背景下农户生态农业生产方式采用行为研究. 南京农业大学学报:社会科学版, 2015. (3): 69- 74. | |
Zhu C N , Wang S J . Research on farmers' ecological agriculture production mode adopting behavior in the context of the conversion of cropland to forest. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University:Social Sciences Edition, 2015. (3): 69- 74. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||