林业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (12): 106-114.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20240828
• 研究论文 • 上一篇
收稿日期:2024-12-31
修回日期:2025-03-31
出版日期:2025-12-25
发布日期:2026-01-08
通讯作者:
赵建诚
E-mail:jiancheng68@163.com
基金资助:
Zhenya Yang1,Huijing Ni1,Ying Li2,Bo Wang1,Jiancheng Zhao1,*(
)
Received:2024-12-31
Revised:2025-03-31
Online:2025-12-25
Published:2026-01-08
Contact:
Jiancheng Zhao
E-mail:jiancheng68@163.com
摘要:
目的: 探究覆盖和未覆盖毛竹林鞭笋外观、营养和食味品质的时序变化规律,综合分析覆盖经营对毛竹鞭笋品质的影响,为高品质毛竹鞭笋培育提供参考。方法: 以浙江省长兴县覆盖和未覆盖毛竹林为研究对象,分别于5、7、9月取样,测定鞭笋的外观形态、营养物质、呈味物质和氨基酸含量,采用单因素方差分析进行显著性检验,应用最小显著性差异法进行多重比较,运用主成分分析法计算不同经营措施毛竹鞭笋品质综合指数,并对其进行综合评价。结果: 鞭笋基径、长度、质量、可食率均呈先升高后降低趋势,且覆盖毛竹林均高于未覆盖毛竹林;鞭笋淀粉、脂肪、可溶性糖、蛋白质和维生素C含量均呈先升高后降低趋势,总氨基酸含量逐渐升高,且覆盖毛竹林鞭笋淀粉、脂肪、可溶性糖、蛋白质和维生素C含量在各取样时间均显著高于未覆盖毛竹林;鞭笋纤维素、草酸、单宁、总黄酮和总酸含量均呈先降低后升高趋势,木质素含量逐渐增加,糖酸比呈先升高后降低趋势;覆盖毛竹林鞭笋纤维素、木质素、草酸、单宁、总黄酮和总酸含量均显著低于未覆盖毛竹林,但覆盖毛竹林鞭笋糖酸比显著高于未覆盖毛竹林;苦味氨基酸和芳香味氨基酸含量和比例逐渐降低,而甜味氨基酸含量和比例逐渐升高;覆盖毛竹林鞭笋鲜味氨基酸、甜味氨基酸和芳香味氨基酸的含量和比例均显著高于未覆盖毛竹林,而覆盖毛竹林鞭笋苦味氨基酸的含量和比例显著低于未覆盖毛竹林。鞭笋品质综合评价表明,覆盖经营可显著提高毛竹鞭笋品质综合指数,且7月显著高于5和9月。结论: 毛竹鞭笋外观、营养和食味品质存在显著的时序变化,且均以7月为佳。覆盖经营有利于改善鞭笋外观形态,提高营养成分,增加鲜味和甜味,降低苦涩味和粗糙度,显著提升鞭笋的品质和适口性。
中图分类号:
杨振亚,倪惠菁,李颖,王波,赵建诚. 覆盖经营对毛竹林鞭笋品质及其时序变化的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(12): 106-114.
Zhenya Yang,Huijing Ni,Ying Li,Bo Wang,Jiancheng Zhao. Effects of Mulching Management on the Quality and Temporal Variation of Rhizome Shoots in Moso Bamboo Forests[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(12): 106-114.
表2
覆盖经营对鞭笋外观品质的影响①"
| 处理 Treatment | 取样时间 Sampling time | 基径 Basal diameter/cm | 长度 Length/cm | 质量 Mass/g | 可食率 Edible portion (%) |
| 不覆盖 No-mulching | 2024?05 | 2.05±0.13Ba | 26.94±1.76Aa | 144.27±5.17Ba | 18.21±1.15Bb |
| 2024?07 | 2.33±0.11Aa | 28.42±2.26Ab | 160.36±5.07Ab | 21.99±1.17Ab | |
| 2024?09 | 2.06±0.11Ba | 25.72±1.44Ab | 148.82±5.26Ba | 17.09±1.24Bb | |
| 覆盖 Mulching | 2024?05 | 2.10±0.21Aa | 30.11±2.17Ba | 154.84±7.92Ba | 21.04±1.52Ba |
| 2024?07 | 2.44±0.21Aa | 34.16±1.22Aa | 176.58±9.96Aa | 24.84±1.67Aa | |
| 2024?09 | 2.14±0.22Aa | 29.17±1.51Ba | 159.00±7.15Ba | 21.51±1.57Ba |
表3
覆盖经营对鞭笋营养品质的影响①"
| 处理 Treatment | 取样时间 Sampling time | 淀粉 Starch/ (mg·g–1) | 脂肪 Fat/ (mg·g–1) | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar/ (mg·g–1) | 蛋白质 Protein/ (mg·g–1) | 维生素C Vitamin C/ (μg·g–1) | 总氨基酸 Total amino acid/ (mg·g–1) |
| 不覆盖 No-mulching | 2024?05 | 13.28±0.57Ab | 17.38±0.99ABb | 14.53±0.95Ab | 19.25±0.56Bb | 58.55±1.35ABb | 2.06±0.09Aa |
| 2024?07 | 14.37±0.47Ab | 18.55±0.73Ab | 14.95±1.01Ab | 20.48±0.48Ab | 60.53±0.93Ab | 2.12±0.10Aa | |
| 2024?09 | 13.13±0.99Ab | 16.77±1.00Bb | 12.82±0.62Bb | 19.17±0.65Bb | 57.82±1.01Bb | 2.16±0.06Ab | |
| 覆盖 Mulching | 2024?05 | 16.13±1.28Aa | 20.57±2.49Aa | 16.68±0.91Aa | 22.17±0.83ABa | 62.87±1.43Ba | 2.20±0.11Aa |
| 2024?07 | 17.03±0.88Aa | 21.22±2.55Aa | 17.37±1.24Aa | 22.88±0.75Aa | 65.88±1.51Aa | 2.26±0.09Aa | |
| 2024?09 | 15.07±0.99Aa | 20.87±1.66Aa | 14.68±0.83Ba | 21.38±0.74Ba | 62.23±1.66Ba | 2.30±0.05Aa |
表4
覆盖经营对鞭笋食味品质的影响①"
| 处理 Treatment | 取样时间 Sampling time | 纤维素 Cellulose/ (mg·g–1) | 木质素 Lignose/ (mg·g–1) | 草酸 Oxalic acid/ (mg·g–1) | 单宁 Tannin/ (mg·g–1) | 总黄酮 Total flavone/ (mg·g–1) | 总酸 Total acid/ (mg·g–1) | 糖酸比 Ratio of sugar to acid |
| 不覆盖 No-mulching | 2024?05 | 227.42±9.09Ba | 114.68±6.56Aa | 2.91±0.10Aa | 2.62±0.08Aa | 46.88±1.78Aa | 1.82±0.12Aa | 8.00±0.77ABb |
| 2024?07 | 211.65±8.80Ca | 116.37±7.42Aa | 2.72±0.08Ba | 2.47±0.04Ba | 41.15±2.06Ba | 1.63±0.06Ba | 9.15±0.43Ab | |
| 2024?09 | 243.02±5.12Aa | 125.97±7.06Aa | 2.94±0.12Aa | 2.66±0.06Aa | 47.15±1.74Aa | 1.77±0.08Aa | 7.26±0.27Bb | |
| 覆盖 Mulching | 2024?05 | 184.67±7.71Bb | 92.73±6.00Bb | 2.50±0.11Ab | 2.36±0.08Bb | 32.57±1.19ABb | 1.43±0.09ABb | 11.72±0.79Aa |
| 2024?07 | 183.17±7.03Bb | 94.68±6.46Bb | 2.49±0.10Ab | 2.34±0.08Bb | 31.03±1.10Bb | 1.35±0.10Bb | 12.95±1.23Aa | |
| 2024?09 | 212.67±10.19Ab | 107.35±5.80Ab | 2.63±0.12Ab | 2.54±0.07Aa | 34.72±1.77Ab | 1.57±0.10Ab | 9.39±1.02Ba |
表5
覆盖经营对鞭笋呈味氨基酸含量的影响①"
| 处理 Treatment | 取样时间 Sampling time | 苦味氨基酸 Bitter amino acid | 鲜味氨基酸 Delicious amino acid | 甜味氨基酸 Sweet amino acid | 芳香味氨基酸 Aromatic amino acid |
| 不覆盖 No-mulching | 2024?05 | 1.01±0.07Aa | 0.19±0.01Ab | 0.47±0.05Ab | 0.31±0.02Ab |
| 2024?07 | 1.00±0.04Aa | 0.20±0.01Ab | 0.49±0.05Ab | 0.30±0.02Ab | |
| 2024?09 | 0.98±0.03Aa | 0.19±0.01Ab | 0.51±0.03Ab | 0.28±0.02Ab | |
| 覆盖 Mulching | 2024?05 | 0.89±0.07Ab | 0.22±0.01Ba | 0.60±0.04Aa | 0.42±0.01Aa |
| 2024?07 | 0.88±0.04Ab | 0.25±0.01ABa | 0.62±0.04Aa | 0.40±0.02ABa | |
| 2024?09 | 0.86±0.02Ab | 0.28±0.02Aa | 0.65±0.03Aa | 0.39±0.01Ba |
表6
覆盖经营对鞭笋呈味氨基酸比例的影响①"
| 处理 Treatment | 取样时间 Sampling time | 苦味氨基酸 Bitter amino acid | 鲜味氨基酸 Delicious amino acid | 甜味氨基酸 Sweet amino acid | 芳香味氨基酸 Aromatic amino acid |
| 不覆盖 No-mulching | 2024?05 | 49.20±2.60Aa | 9.48±0.70Aa | 22.92±2.30Ab | 15.15±1.18Ab |
| 2024?07 | 47.35±1.79ABa | 9.31±0.40Ab | 23.12±1.36Ab | 14.04±0.75ABb | |
| 2024?09 | 45.47±1.92Ba | 8.86±0.38Ab | 23.44±1.15Ab | 13.36±0.60Bb | |
| 覆盖 Mulching | 2024?05 | 40.61±1.71Ab | 10.06±0.55Ba | 27.19±1.09Aa | 19.22±0.56Aa |
| 2024?07 | 38.97±1.58ABb | 11.03±0.54ABa | 27.39±0.91Aa | 17.72±0.89Ba | |
| 2024?09 | 37.36±1.17Bb | 11.97±0.66Aa | 28.13±1.15Aa | 17.14±0.60Ba |
表7
鞭笋品质指标的主成分因子荷载矩阵、公因子方差和权重"
| 指标 Index | 主成分 Principal component | 公因子方差 σ2 of common factor | 权重 Weight | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
| 基径 Basal diameter | 0.092 8 | 0.138 8 | 0.703 8 | 0.234 3 | 0.060 5 | 0.581 8 | 0.116 3 |
| 长度 Length | 0.226 5 | 0.033 6 | 0.084 1 | ?0.234 6 | ?0.258 7 | 0.181 5 | 0.036 3 |
| 质量 Mass | 0.198 0 | ?0.115 8 | 0.381 7 | 0.123 7 | ?0.100 8 | 0.223 8 | 0.044 8 |
| 可食率 Edible portion | 0.218 9 | 0.119 6 | 0.217 0 | 0.231 9 | 0.107 6 | 0.174 7 | 0.034 9 |
| 淀粉 Starch | 0.236 3 | 0.032 0 | ?0.060 6 | ?0.009 9 | ?0.279 3 | 0.138 6 | 0.027 7 |
| 脂肪 Fat | ?0.205 7 | 0.154 8 | 0.028 9 | 0.365 9 | 0.208 5 | 0.244 5 | 0.048 9 |
| 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 0.215 7 | 0.223 7 | ?0.123 1 | ?0.006 0 | ?0.325 2 | 0.217 5 | 0.043 5 |
| 蛋白质 Protein | 0.246 2 | 0.070 8 | ?0.005 1 | ?0.015 9 | 0.204 1 | 0.107 6 | 0.021 5 |
| 维生素C Vitamin C | 0.244 5 | 0.081 4 | 0.100 0 | ?0.091 8 | 0.018 3 | 0.085 2 | 0.017 0 |
| 纤维素 Cellulose | 0.240 8 | 0.221 0 | 0.019 8 | ?0.184 9 | 0.133 9 | 0.159 3 | 0.031 9 |
| 木质素 Lignose | 0.220 9 | 0.181 5 | ?0.308 3 | 0.205 1 | 0.188 6 | 0.254 4 | 0.050 9 |
| 草酸 Oxalic acid | 0.236 5 | 0.080 6 | ?0.069 5 | 0.108 8 | 0.388 8 | 0.230 3 | 0.046 1 |
| 单宁 Tannin | 0.213 2 | 0.323 2 | 0.033 6 | ?0.176 5 | 0.344 8 | 0.301 1 | 0.060 2 |
| 总黄酮 Total flavone | 0.260 9 | ?0.042 3 | ?0.059 4 | ?0.025 5 | ?0.003 3 | 0.074 0 | 0.014 8 |
| 总酸 Total acid | 0.232 2 | 0.084 5 | ?0.013 0 | 0.007 5 | ?0.275 8 | 0.137 3 | 0.027 5 |
| 糖酸比 Ratio of sugar to acid | 0.243 2 | 0.173 7 | ?0.075 5 | 0.027 3 | ?0.351 5 | 0.219 3 | 0.043 9 |
| 总氨基酸 Total amino acid | 0.163 2 | ?0.468 1 | 0.163 0 | ?0.372 4 | 0.141 1 | 0.430 9 | 0.086 2 |
| 鲜味氨基酸 Umami amino acid | 0.193 4 | ?0.430 8 | 0.075 0 | 0.167 1 | ?0.014 5 | 0.256 7 | 0.051 3 |
| 甜味氨基酸 Sweet amino acid | 0.212 7 | ?0.398 4 | ?0.033 9 | 0.020 5 | 0.120 4 | 0.220 0 | 0.044 0 |
| 苦味氨基酸 Bitter amino acid | 0.183 8 | ?0.231 6 | ?0.223 7 | 0.619 7 | ?0.119 2 | 0.535 7 | 0.107 1 |
| 芳香味氨基酸 Aromatic amino acid | 0.235 7 | ?0.127 8 | ?0.284 6 | ?0.080 8 | 0.257 9 | 0.225 9 | 0.045 2 |
| 特征值 Eigenvalue | 13.61 | 1.72 | 1.36 | 0.76 | 0.62 | — | — |
| 贡献率 Proportion (%) | 64.82 | 8.23 | 6.49 | 3.64 | 2.96 | — | — |
| 累积贡献率 Cumulative proportion (%) | 64.82 | 73.04 | 79.53 | 83.17 | 86.13 | — | — |
图1
覆盖和未覆盖经营毛竹鞭笋品质综合指数 NM: 不覆盖 No-mulching; M: 覆盖 Mulching. 同一取样时间不同大写字母表示不同处理间差异显著(P<0.05),同一处理不同小写字母表示不同取样时间间差异显著(P<0.05)。Different capital letters of the same sampling time indicate significant differences in comprehensive quality index between the two treatments (P<0.05), and different lowercase letters of the same treatment indicate significant differences in comprehensive quality index among different sampling times (P<0.05)."
| 陈双林. 毛竹林地覆盖竹笋早出技术应用的问题思考. 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28 (5): 799- 804. | |
| Chen S L. Thoughts on related problems of mulched technique with organic materials in moso bamboo forest for early shooting. Journal of Zhejiang A& F University, 2011, 28 (5): 799- 804. | |
| 郭子武, 江志标, 陈双林, 等. 覆土栽培对高节竹笋品质的影响. 广西植物, 2015a, 35 (4): 515- 519. | |
| Guo Z W, Jiang Z B, Chen S L, et al. Influence of soil covered cultivation on shoot quality of Phyllostachys prominens. Guihaia, 2015a, 35 (4): 515- 519. | |
| 郭子武, 江志标, 陈双林, 等. 高节竹与毛竹鞭笋品质和适口性比较. 林业科学研究, 2015b, 8 (3): 447- 450. | |
| Guo Z W, Jiang Z B, Chen S L, et al. Comparative study on quality and palatability of rhizome shoot of Phyllostachys prominens and Phyllostachys edulis. Forest Research, 2015b, 8 (3): 447- 450. | |
| 江泽慧. 2002. 世界竹藤. 沈阳: 辽宁科学技术出版社. | |
| Jiang Z H. 2002. Bamboo and rattan in the world. Shenyang: Liaoning Science and Technology Press. [in Chinese] | |
| 李建伟, 覃万玲, 辉朝茂, 等. 甜龙竹笋品质的地理变异及其与立地环境的关系. 林业科学, 2024, 60 (11): 75- 83. | |
| Li J W, Qin W L, Hui C M, et al. Geographical variation in quality of Dendrocalamus brandisii bamboo shoots and its relationship with the site conditions. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2024, 60 (11): 75- 83. | |
| 李 婷. 2016. 覆盖对毛竹林土壤理化性质和竹笋质量的影响. 成都: 四川农业大学. | |
| Li T. 2016. Effects of mulching on soil physicochemistry properties and quality of bamboo shoots in Phyllostachys heterocycla stand. Chengdu: Sichuan Agricultural University. [in Chinese] | |
| 李雪蕾, 丁兴萃, 张闪闪, 等. 不同光强下麻竹笋不同部位苦涩味物质含量的变化. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39 (3): 161- 166. | |
| Li X L, Ding X C, Zhang S S, et al. The distributions of bitter and astringent taste compounds in the bamboo shoot of Dendrocalamus latiflorus under different light intensities. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2015, 39 (3): 161- 166. | |
| 毛达民, 陆媛媛, 郑林水, 等. 鞭笋挖掘后毛竹竹鞭的生长规律. 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28 (5): 833- 836. | |
| Mao D M, Lu Y Y, Zheng L S, et al. Growth of bamboo running rhizomes after digging up bamboo rhizome shoots. Journal of Zhejiang A& F University, 2011, 28 (5): 833- 836. | |
| 毛海波, 钟子龙, 余水生, 等. 提早采挖鞭笋对毛竹林生产和生长的影响. 浙江林业科技, 2016, 36 (5): 31- 35. | |
| Mao H B, Zhong Z L, Yu S S, et al. Effect of harvesting rhizome shoot on Phyllostachys heterocycla cv. pubescens growth. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2016, 36 (5): 31- 35. | |
| 莫润宏, 王富民, 倪张林, 等. 离子排斥色谱-双检测器法同时测定果蔬中的糖、有机酸和维生素C. 现代食品科技, 2016, 32 (4): 277- 282. | |
| Mo R H, Wang F M, Ni Z L, et al. Simultaneous determination of sugar, organic acids, and vitamin C in agricultural products by ion-exclusion chromatography with refractive index and diode array detectors. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2016, 32 (4): 277- 282. | |
| 莫月雯. 2014. 毛竹笋用林覆盖技术研究. 杭州: 浙江大学. | |
| Mo Y W. 2014. Moso bamboo shoot forest coverage for technology research. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University. [in Chinese] | |
| 倪惠菁, 赵建诚, 仲建平, 等. 蚕沙有机肥对雷竹笋产量和品质的影响. 浙江林业科技, 2024, 44 (5): 81- 86. | |
| Ni H J, Zhao J C, Zhong J P, et al. Effects of silkworm excrement organic fertilizer on the yield and quality of Phyllostachys violascens ‘Prevernalis’ shoots. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2024, 44 (5): 81- 86. | |
| 裘鑫灿, 叶祖英, 黄望华, 等. 不同垦复措施对毛竹鞭笋产量的影响. 竹子学报, 2020, 39 (2): 11- 14. | |
| Qiu X C, Ye Z Y, Huang W H, et al. Effects of reclamation on the yield of Phyllostachys edulis rhizome shoots. Journal of Bamboo Research, 2020, 39 (2): 11- 14. | |
| 时俊帅, 陈双林, 郭子武, 等. 3个海拔梯度对高节竹笋品质的影响. 林业科学研究, 2018, 31 (4): 113- 117. | |
| Shi J S, Chen S L, Guo Z W, et al. Influence of altitudes on quality of Phyllostachys prominens shoot. Forest Research, 2018, 31 (4): 113- 117. | |
| 唐隆校, 周智峰, 潘建华. 林地覆盖对毛竹鞭笋生长的影响. 浙江林业科技, 2015, 35 (4): 81- 84. | |
| Tang L X, Zhou Z F, Pan J H. Effect of mulching on rhizome shoot growth of Phyllostachys heterocycla cv. pubescens stand. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2015, 35 (4): 81- 84. | |
| 童 龙, 张 磊, 李 彬, 等. 覆土栽培对绿竹笋品质与适口性的影响. 江西农业大学学报, 2018, 40 (3): 487- 493. | |
| Tong L, Zhang L, Li B, et al. Influence of soil-covered cultivation on quality and palatability of Dendrocalamopsis oldhami shoot. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2018, 40 (3): 487- 493. | |
| 王 波, 李 琴, 朱 炜, 等. 毛竹林覆盖经营对土壤养分含量、酶活性及微生物生物量的影响. 林业科学, 2019, 55 (1): 110- 118. | |
| Wang B, Li Q, Zhu W, et al. Effects of mulching management on nutrient contents, enzyme activities, and microbial biomass in the soils of moso bamboo forests. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55 (1): 110- 118. | |
| 王晓娟, 马光良, 陈 洪, 等. 不同覆盖措施对梁山慈竹出笋和竹笋适口性的影响. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46 (2): 143- 149. | |
| Wang X J, Ma G L, Chen H, et al. Effects of different mulching measures on bamboo shooting and palatability of Dendrocalamus farinosus. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2022, 46 (2): 143- 149. | |
| 徐 森, 杨丽婷, 陈双林, 等. 竹笋适口性形成及其主要影响因素研究综述. 浙江农林大学学报, 2021, 38 (2): 403- 411. | |
| Xu S, Yang L T, Chen S L, et al. Review on the formation of bamboo shoot palatability and its main influencing factors. Journal of Zhejiang A& F University, 2021, 38 (2): 403- 411. | |
| 章志远, 丁兴萃, 崔逢欣, 等. 避光对麻竹笋苦涩味及单宁含量、形态与分布的影响. 林业科学研究, 2016, 29 (5): 770- 777. | |
| Zhang Z Y, Ding X C, Cui F X, et al. Impact of avoiding light on bitterness and astringency, tannin content, morphology and distribution of Dendrocalamus latiflorus. Forest Research, 2016, 29 (5): 770- 777. | |
| 赵建诚, 倪惠菁, 杨振亚, 等. 覆盖物移除时间对毛竹鞭笋产量及品质的影响. 东北林业大学学报, 2025, 53 (8): 61- 68. | |
| Zhao J C, Ni H J, Yang Z Y, et al. Effect of mulch removal time on rhizome shoot yield and quality of Phyllostachy edulis. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2025, 53 (8): 61- 68. | |
| 钟子龙, 朱文强, 吴礼栋. 腊月下旬撤除覆盖物对毛竹林产量和生长的影响. 东北林业大学学报, 2016, 44 (6): 7- 10. | |
| Zhong Z L, Zhu W Q, Wu L D. Effect of removing the mulch in mid and late December on Phyllostachys heterocycla cv. pubescens yield and growth. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2016, 44 (6): 7- 10. | |
|
Acharya B, Behera A, Sahu P K, et al. Bamboo shoots: an exploration into its culinary heritage in India and its nutraceutical potential. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 2023, 10 (1): 22.
doi: 10.1186/s42779-023-00190-7 |
|
|
Chongtham N, Bisht M S, Premlata T, et al. Quality improvement of bamboo shoots by removal of antinutrients using different processing techniques: a review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2022, 59 (1): 1- 11.
doi: 10.1007/s13197-021-04987-9 |
|
|
Chongtham N, Bisht M S, Santosh O, et al. Mineral elements in bamboo shoots and potential role in food fortification. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2021, 95, 103662.
doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2020.103662 |
|
|
Gamuyao R, Nagai K, Ayano M, et al. Hormone distribution and transcriptome profiles in bamboo shoots provide insights on bamboo stem emergence and growth. Plant and Cell Physiology, 2017, 58 (4): 702- 716.
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcx023 |
|
|
Li X L, Xing Y G, Shui Y R, et al. Quality of bamboo shoots during storage as affected by high hydrostatic pressure processing. International Journal of Food Properties, 2021, 24 (1): 656- 676.
doi: 10.1080/10942912.2021.1914084 |
|
| Pokhariya P, Tangariya P, Sahoo A, et al. Reducing hydrocyanic acid content, nutritional and sensory quality evaluation of edible bamboo shoot based food products. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 2018, 6 (4): 1079- 1084. | |
|
Wang Y L, Chen J, Wang D M, et al. A systematic review on the composition, storage, processing of bamboo shoots: focusing the nutritional and functional benefits. Journal of Functional Foods, 2020, 71, 104015.
doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2020.104015 |
|
|
Wu W J, Hu J, Gao H Y, et al. The potential cholesterol-lowering and prebiotic effects of bamboo shoot dietary fibers and their structural characteristics. Food Chemistry, 2020, 332, 127372.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127372 |
|
|
Zhao J C, Cai C J. Physiological integration improves nitrogen use efficiency of moso bamboo: an isotopic (15N) assessment. Forest Ecology and Management, 2023, 542, 121073.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121073 |
|
|
Zhao J C, Wang B, Li Q, et al. Analysis of soil degradation causes in Phyllostachys edulis forests with different mulching years. Forests, 2018, 9 (3): 149.
doi: 10.3390/f9030149 |
| [1] | 谷瑞,范少辉,魏松坡,刘广路. 基于表型性状的毛竹核心种质构建[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(9): 101-112. |
| [2] | 王晓荣,龚苗,辜忠春,胡兴宜,漆良华,谭海山,戴薛,刘清平,夏少丹,赵虎. 幕阜山区毛竹向杉木林和阔叶林扩张的细根分解及养分释放特征[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(8): 46-57. |
| [3] | 王江飞,李慧,朱成磊,狄小琳,李英,王清楠,宛慧茹,孙化雨,高志民. 毛竹PeBAM3在叶片淀粉分解过程的功能[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(8): 231-240. |
| [4] | 闫小玲,郝琴,申孜,张雨佳,郭小勤. 毛竹PheFT1基因的表达、蛋白互作及生物学功能分析[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(4): 140-152. |
| [5] | 马欣欣,王游,王佳军,冯龙,马建锋. 热解过程中竹材灰分组成变化及硅的转化分布规律[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(2): 172-179. |
| [6] | 杨乐梅,张宝刚,陈有超,蔡延江. 毛竹林林下植物叶片功能性状的模拟氮沉降响应[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(12): 61-71. |
| [7] | 李慧,王清楠,朱成磊,孙化雨,狄小琳,高志民. 3个竹种Rubisco活化酶基因鉴定及其功能[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(11): 35-44. |
| [8] | 张翱,李文婷,王天祥,武耀星,雷刚,漆良华. 毛竹林土壤易氧化有机碳区域分异及影响因素[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(6): 1-12. |
| [9] | 王一,栾军伟,陈琛,刘世荣. 毛竹林土壤呼吸及组分对氮磷添加的非对等响应[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(7): 54-64. |
| [10] | 袁金玲,岳晋军,马婧瑕,于磊,刘蕾. 元宝毛竹的秆形特征[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(5): 71-80. |
| [11] | 蔡宗明,邓智文,李秉钧,李士坤,温伟庆,荣俊冬,郑郁善,陈礼光. 带状采伐宽度对毛竹林地下竹鞭结构特征的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(4): 79-87. |
| [12] | 郑亚雄,范少辉,张璇,周潇,官凤英. 带状采伐毛竹林生产力变化规律[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(2): 22-29. |
| [13] | 代琳心,王智辉,李振瑞,王佳军,刘杏娥,文甲龙,马建锋. 基于TG-FTIR的竹材细胞壁主要组分热解特性[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(11): 85-94. |
| [14] | 徐森,董亚文,陈双林,郭子武,杨丽婷,谢燕燕. 覆盖雷竹笋箨叶碳氮代谢特征及其与竹笋食味品质的关系[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(8): 109-116. |
| [15] | 刘彩霞,陈俊辉,秦华,梁辰飞,徐秋芳. 有机无机肥长期配施对毛竹林土壤固碳和固氮微生物的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(7): 82-92. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||