|
程小玲. 新时期乡镇林业站面临的形势与发展思考. 林业资源管理, 2013, (6): 28- 32.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6622.2013.06.007
|
|
Cheng X L. Discussion on the situation and development of township forestry stations in the new period. Forest Resources Management, 2013, (6): 28- 32.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6622.2013.06.007
|
|
福建省森林资源管理总站. 构筑服务平台 创新服务方式 全面提升职能作用: 福建省基层林业站服务体系建设情况介绍. 林业资源管理, 2010, (4): 5- 7.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6622.2010.04.002
|
|
General Forest Management Station of Fujian Province. Building service platforms and innovating service methods to comprehensively enhance functional roles: an introduction to the construction of service system for grassroots forestry stations in Fujian Province. Forest Resources Management, 2010, (4): 5- 7.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6622.2010.04.002
|
|
郭聪聪, 荣艳菊, 张 宇, 等. 我省基层林业站建设成效显著. 河北林业, 2023, (2): 24- 25.
|
|
Guo C C, Rong Y J, Zhang Y, et al. Remarkable achievements in the construction of grassroots forestry stations in our province. Hebei Forestry, 2023, (2): 24- 25.
|
|
刘 璨, 康子昊, 朱文清, 等. 中国集体林权制度改革: 2012年以来的新进展与40余年的典型事实分析. 林业经济, 2024, 46 (5): 5- 23.
|
|
Liu C, Kang Z H, Zhu W Q, et al. China’s reform of collective forestland tenure: new progresses since 2012 and stylized facts over the past 40 years. Forestry Economics, 2024, 46 (5): 5- 23.
|
|
刘 璨, 李 云, 张敏新, 等. 新时代中国集体林改及其相关环境因素动态分析. 林业经济, 2020, 42 (1): 9- 27.
|
|
Liu C, Li Y, Zhang M X, et al. Dynamic analysis on collective forest reform and related environmental factors in China in the new era. Forestry Economics, 2020, 42 (1): 9- 27.
|
|
刘 璨, 刘 浩, 贺胜年. 中国集体林产权制度改革主要政策问题研究. 林业经济, 2011, 33 (8): 8- 19.
|
|
Liu C, Liu H, He S N. The key issues on reform of collective forestland tenure in China. Forestry Economics, 2011, 33 (8): 8- 19.
|
|
刘 璨, 刘 浩, 朱文清, 等. 城乡关系背景下中国集体林权制度变迁分析. 中国农村经济, 2023a, (10): 136- 157.
|
|
Liu C, Liu H, Zhu W Q, et al. Changes in China’s collective forestland tenure system in the context of urban-rural relations. Chinese Rural Economy, 2023a, (10): 136- 157.
|
|
刘 璨, 张 寒. 集体林权制度改革进程、效应与演化: 2002—2022年. 改革, 2023b, (8): 140- 155.
|
|
Liu C, Zhang H. The course, effects, and evolution of the reform of collective forest rights system: 2002—2022. Reform, 2023b, (8): 140- 155.
|
|
刘 璨, 张永亮, 赵 楠, 等. 集体林权制度改革发展现状、问题及对策. 林业经济, 2017, 39 (7): 3- 14,22.
|
|
Liu C, Zhang Y L, Zhao N, et al. The status, issues and countermeasures for the reform of collective forestland tenure system in China. Forestry Economics, 2017, 39 (7): 3- 14,22.
|
|
刘朝阳, 柳小慧. 土地财政的货币效应: 理论机制、经验证据与政策含义——基于地级市面板数据的PVAR模型分析. 财政研究, 2021, (11): 45- 58.
|
|
Liu C Y, Liu X H. Monetary effect of land finance: theoretical mechanism, empirical evidence and policy implications——PVAR model analysis based on panel data of prefecture-level cities. Public Finance Research, 2021, (11): 45- 58.
|
|
刘煜莹, 洪燕真, 杨小军, 等. “社会-生态系统”视角下森林生态治理研究综述. 林业经济, 2022, 44 (6): 5- 19.
|
|
Liu Y Y, Hong Y Z, Yang X J, et al. Review on forest ecological management from the perspective of “social-ecological system”. Forestry Economics, 2022, 44 (6): 5- 19.
|
|
王培帆, 贺 超, 杨桂红, 等. 林业科技服务供需匹配程度及需求影响因素研究: 以辽宁集体林区500户农户为例. 林业经济, 2019, 41 (4): 25- 31,57.
|
|
Wang P F, He C, Yang G H, et al. Research on the matching degree of supply and demand for forestry technology service and the influencing factors of demand: a case study of 500 farmers in Liaoning collective forest area. Forestry Economics, 2019, 41 (4): 25- 31,57.
|
|
魏 建, 尹少华, 刘 璨. 新一轮集体林权制度改革对兼业与非兼业农户收入的影响研究. 林业经济, 2018, 40 (12): 64- 71.
|
|
Wei J, Yin S H, Liu C. Research on the impact of the new collective forestland tenure reform on the income of part-time and non-part-time households. Forestry Economics, 2018, 40 (12): 64- 71.
|
|
吴守蓉, 邬惠中, 白石则彦. 基于服务型政府建设的基层林业站职能优化途径研究. 农村经济, 2015, (7): 100- 105.
|
|
Wu S R, Wu H Z, Bai-Shi Z Y. Research on the optimization path of grassroots forestry station functions based on the construction of a service-oriented government. Rural Economy, 2015, (7): 100- 105.
|
|
杨 萍, 张红霄, 彭晓民, 等. 集体林权制度改革对农户造林意愿的影响: 基于江西省6个案例村农户调查. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 13 (3): 58- 66.
|
|
Yang P, Zhang H X, Peng X M, et al. Impact of collective forest tenure reform on farmers’ willingness and action for afforestation: based on case investigation in six villages in Jiangxi Province. Journal of Northwest A& F University (Social Science Edition), 2013, 13 (3): 58- 66.
|
|
张 寒, 赵赛菲, 赵 青. 劳动力成本上升与农户营林投入结构调整: 基于林种视角的分析. 林业经济, 2023, 45 (2): 5- 19.
|
|
Zhang H, Zhao S F, Zhao Q. Rising labor costs and farmers' input structure adjustment in forest culture and management: analysis based on the perspective of forest category. Forestry Economics, 2023, 45 (2): 5- 19.
|
|
张 寒, 周正康, 杨红强, 等. 劳动力成本上升对农户营林投入结构的影响: 基于林业社会化服务供给约束的视角. 中国农村经济, 2022, (4): 106- 125.
|
|
Zhang H, Zhou Z K, Yang H Q, et al. The impact of increased labor costs on farmers’ input structure of forestland management: an analysis from the perspective of supply constraints of forestry socialized services. Chinese Rural Economy, 2022, (4): 106- 125.
|
|
周小亮, 宋 立. 中国工业低碳转型: 现实分析与政策思考. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2022, 39 (8): 22- 41.
|
|
Zhou X L, Song L. Low-carbon transformation of China's industry: realistic analysis and policy thinking. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2022, 39 (8): 22- 41.
|
|
Holtz-Eakin D, Newey W, Rosen H S. Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica, 1988, 56 (6): 1371.
doi: 10.2307/1913103
|
|
Lu S S, Sun H S, Zhou Y, et al. Examining the impact of forestry policy on poor and non-poor farmers’ income and production input in collective forest areas in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 276, 123784.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123784
|
|
Tone K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 130 (3): 498- 509.
doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5
|
|
Tone K. A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 143 (1): 32- 41.
doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00324-1
|
|
Yang L, Ren Y. Property rights, village democracy, and household forestry income: evidence from China’s collective forest tenure reform. Journal of Forest Research, 2021, 26 (1): 7- 16.
doi: 10.1080/13416979.2020.1854064
|